Next Article in Journal
One-Pot Green Catalytic Preparation of 3-Aminobenzoic Acid in the Presence of Carbonaceous Bio-Based Materials in Subcritical Water
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Pd over Novel TiO2 Mixtures: Insights on Metal–Support Interactions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Structural Investigation of the Carbon Deposits on Ni/Al2O3 Catalyst Modified by CaO-MgO for the Biogas Dry Reforming Reaction †

by
Nikolaos D. Charisiou
1,
Georgios I. Siakavelas
1,
Victor Sebastian
2,
Steven J. Hinder
3,
Mark A. Baker
3,
Vagelis G. Papadakis
4,
Wen Wang
5,
Kyriaki Polychronopoulou
6,7 and
Maria A. Goula
1,*
1
Laboratory of Alternative Fuels and Environmental Catalysis (LAFEC), Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece
2
Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, Instituto de Nanociencia de Aragón (INA) and Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón (ICMA), Universidad de Zaragoza-CSIC, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
3
The Surface Analysis Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 4DL, UK
4
Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Patras, 30100 Agrinio, Greece
5
Biomass Energy and Environmental Engineering Research Center, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
6
Center for Catalysis and Separation, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, P.O. Box 127788, UAE
7
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, P.O. Box 127788, UAE
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Catalysis Sciences, 10–30 November 2020; Available online: https://eccs2020.sciforum.net.
Chem. Proc. 2020, 2(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/ECCS2020-07569
Published: 9 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Catalysis Sciences)

Abstract

:
Ni catalysts based on Al2O3 and Al2O3 modified with CaO-MgO were tested for the dry reforming of biogas (BDR). Time-on-stream experiments were carried out between 600 and 800 °C, and the spent catalysts were examined using a variety of characterization techniques including, N2 adsorption/desorption, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Raman spectroscopy, electron microscopy (STEM-HAADF and HR-TEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). It was revealed that the carbon deposits consisted of carbon nanotubes and amorphous carbon for both samples. XPS studies showed the presence of Ni0 on both catalysts and Ni2O3/NiAl2O4 on the Ni/Al2O3 sample. The time-on-stream experiments showed that the Ni/CaO-MgO-Al2O3 catalyst is more resistant to deactivation and more active and selective for all temperatures under investigation. It was concluded that doping Al2O3 with CaO-MgO enhances catalytic performance as: (a) it helps to maintain highly dispersed Ni0 during the BDR as the interaction between metal and support is a stronger one, (b) it leads to the formation of carbon structures that are easier to oxidize, and (c) it facilitates the gasification of the carbon deposits because its increased surface basic sites enhance the adsorption of carbon dioxide.

1. Introduction

Biogas is a product of the anaerobic digestion of biomass. It contains mainly CH4 and CO2 and can be used for the production of syngas (H2/CO) via dry reforming (BDR) [1]. Syngas is a valuable feedstock in the chemical industry used for the synthesis of oxygenated chemicals and hydrocarbons via the Fisher–Tropsch process [2]. The major issue that must be overcome when using cheap Ni based systems is carbon deposition on the catalyst surface, which is produced via methane decomposition and carbon monoxide disproportionation. The carbon deposited on the catalyst surface can differ in nature and structure [3,4,5]. As is widely understood, the activity of a catalyst system depends on a number of factors, which include the nature of the support and active metal, the catalyst preparation method, and pretreatment. Popular metal oxides tested as supports for Ni based catalysts include Al2O3, SiO2, ZrO2, rare earth metals (e.g., La2O3 and CeO2) [6,7,8,9], or alkaline earth metals (e.g., Ba, Ca, Sr) [10,11,12] as promoters. The present work reports on the catalytic performance of Ni/Al and Ni/CaO-MgO-Al (Ni/modAl) catalysts using typical biogas mixtures (CH4/CO2 = 1.5). It examines the amount and/or the quality of deposited carbon after the time-on-stream experiments and relates this with catalyst deactivation. To achieve this aim, the time-on-stream experiments were performed at different reaction temperatures and the carbon deposited on the spent catalysts was examined by various characterization techniques (N2 adsorption/desorption, TGA, Raman, STEM-HAADF, HR-TEM, and XPS). The evolution of Ni oxidation states during the reaction was investigated using XPS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Catalyst Preparation

The alumina support was obtained from Akzo and the modified alumina (4.5% CaO, 1% MgO, 0.5% SiO2) by Saint Gobain NorPro in pellet form. The supports were crashed and sieved to 350–500 μm and calcined at 800 °C for 4 h. The catalysts were prepared via the wet impregnation technique using the appropriate Ni(NO3)2 6H2O solution to give catalysts with a Ni content of 8 wt.%. The catalysts were dried at 120 °C for 12 h, calcined in atmosphere at 800 °C for 4 h, and in situ activated for 1 h at 800 °C under pure H2 flow. The catalysts are denoted as Ni/Al and Ni/modAl.

2.2. Materials Characterization

The spent catalysts were examined using the following instruments/techniques: (a) Leco TGA 701, (b) S-Twin Tecnai (200 kV G2 20) and Tecnai G2-F30 Field Emission Gun microscope (STEM-HAADF and HR-TEM), (c) ThermoFisher Scientific Instruments K-Alpha+ spectrometer (XPS), (d) WITEC alpha 300R micro-Raman system, and (e) high-resolution 3Flex Micromeritics porosimeter (N2 adsorption/desorption).

2.3. Catalysts Tests

The experimental apparatus used was a continuous flow fixed bed tubular reactor. The tests were carried out at atmospheric pressure. The gas mixture fed into the system was 55% CH4, 35% CO2, and 10% Ar (CH4/CO2 molar ratio = 1.57). Short (10 h) time-on-stream experiments were carried out at different temperatures. The weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) was 40,000 mL g−1 h−1. The analysis of the reactants and products was carried out by gas chromatography in a CG-Agilent 7890A.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Spent Catalysts

3.1.1. Textural Characterization

The N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms for the Ni/Al and Ni/modAl catalysts after their in situ reduction and after reaction at 600, 700, and 800 °C are presented in Figure 1. The respective pore size distribution curves are also presented as insets on the corresponding figures. The isotherms for both samples are type IVa. The hysteresis loop for the reduced Ni/Al sample is type H2(b) (typical of mesoporous materials), but after reaction, this loop is transformed to an H3 type (usually found in materials with macropores). Regarding the Ni/modAl samples, the hysteresis loop is H3 type. This is because, although the adsorption branch resembles a Type II isotherm, the lower limit of the desorption branch is located at the cavitation-induced P/P0.
Regarding the pore size distribution, for the Ni/Al samples, these are single modal types in the mesopore range, centered around 10–20 nm. However, a shift to the micropore range is observed for the samples used at 600 and 700 °C. This is opposing to what can be concluded for the Ni/modal samples, which show that the majority of the population of pores is in the meso-range. Additionally noticeable for the spent catalysts is a shift to a bigger mean diameter, which provides an indication that pore blogging occurs at the meso-range. It can be deduced that for both spent catalysts, the carbon deposition that took place at lower reaction temperatures (600 and 700 °C) covered the mesopores.

3.1.2. TGA Analysis

From the TGA analysis (not shown herein), it was observed that the oxidation process was different between the two catalysts. For the Ni/Al, the main thermal event was found between ≈450–700 °C for the samples tested at low reaction temperatures (600 and 650 °C), but it included up to 800 °C for the catalysts tested at higher reaction Ts. In contrast, for the Ni/modAl, the main thermal event was ≈450–800 °C. According to the literature, amorphous carbon combusts between 200–500 °C, carbon nanofibers (CNFs) and/or carbon nanotubes (CNTs) combust between 500–600 °C, and more graphitic structures, such as multi wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), combust between 600–800 °C [13]. Although these results show that different carbon structures were deposited on the catalysts during the reaction, it appears that a bigger fraction of graphitic coke was deposited on the Ni/Al, especially at higher reaction temperatures. Thus, it can be concluded that the addition of MgO and CaO on the alumina supporting material led to a less graphitic type of carbon, due to the higher rate of carbon oxidation, which could lead to a catalyst with improved stability characteristics.

3.1.3. Raman Spectroscopy Analysis

The results obtained using Raman spectroscopy are shown in Figure 2. This technique allows the investigation of the nature (graphitization) of the carbon deposits. Both samples show peaks between 1000 and 2000 cm−1 (first order region) and between 2300 and 3300 cm−1 (second order region). In the first order region are located two broad bands; these are termed the G-band (between 1500 and 1600 cm−1) and D-band (between 1300 and 1400 cm−1). Deconvolution of the Raman spectra showed that the G and D-band peaks were centered at 1565 and 1345 cm−1 corresponding to CNTs. The extent of graphitization of the coke can be gauged by the relative intensity of the D and G-bands (ID/IG), namely lower ID/IG values are correlated with higher crystallinity due to the higher contribution of the G-band [14]. For all catalysts tested for the present work, it is obvious that the degree of crystallinity increased with an increase in the reaction temperature; however, this increase was more significant for the unmodified nickel catalyst. To illustrate the point, the ID/IG ratio for the Ni/Al sample followed the order 1.32 > 0.72 > 0.45 > 0.44 > 0.35 and for the modified catalyst 1.42 > 1.18 > 1.06 > 0.98 > 0.86 at 600, 650, 700, 750, and 800 °C, respectively.

3.1.4. Electron Microscopy Analysis

At 600 °C, both samples exhibited crystalline carbon allotropes shaped as carbon nanotubes and amorphous carbon; coke encapsulating Ni particles can also be observed. In contrast, at high reaction temperatures (800 °C), no amorphous carbon was detected on the Ni/Al catalyst; only coke encapsulating the active metallic Ni nanoparticles (NPs) could be observed. This was in contrast to the conclusion drawn regarding the Ni/modAl spent catalyst, where amorphous carbon could be observed even after reaction at 800 °C [15]. Another interesting observation was that at 800 °C the Ni/Al catalyst showed the formation of core-shell carbon coated Ni NPs with highly graphitized CNTs formed. This provides a good explanation for the very low ID/IG ratios discussed above. From HR-TEM, a plethora of defects on the CNTs formed onto the Ni/modAl system could be observed. These defects can be explained by the transfer of oxygen and its insertion in the graphitic lattice during CNT growth, which inhibits the formation of CNTs with continuous, straight walls.

3.2. Catalytic Stability

As mentioned above, time-on-stream experiments for the Ni/Al and Ni/modAl were carried out at a variety of reaction temperatures (600, 650, 700, 750, 800 °C). To allow fair comparison, a fresh catalytic sample was used for each experiment. The changes regarding XCH4, XCO2, and YH2 during BDR are depicted in Figure 3. The Ni/Al catalyst shows a steep drop in the conversion and yield values during the first two hours of the reaction (except at 800 °C), which leads to the loss of approximately half of its activity. In contrast, it is obvious that the Ni/modAl catalyst is more stable, active, and selective. These differences are less pronounced at high reaction temperature. As an example, at 650 °C, the Ni/modAl presents almost double the values for XCH4 (40%) and YH2 (35%) over the Ni/Al.
Another observation is that for both catalysts the loss in activity loss decreases as test are carried out at higher reaction temperature. To be more specific, for the Ni/Al sample, the activity loss (ΔX(CH4)%) is between 70% (600 °C) and 20% (800 °C), and for the Ni/modal, it is between 50% (600 °C) and ≈5% (800 °C). It is pointed out that XCO2, YH2, and YCO are affected by the reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reaction, and only the XCH4 provides a true indication of the DRM activity.
Finally, regarding the H2/CO molar ratio, its values are almost constant for the duration of the time-on-stream tests except for the first 2 h of operation in which elevated H2/CO values (up to 1) were recorded. The high H2/CO values point to a significant occurrence of the CH4 cracking reaction, and/or Boudouard reaction. These reactions are mainly responsible for carbon deposition. The severe deactivation shown by both catalysts is also due to the harsh experimental conditions used in this study, i.e., the gas mixture used as feed had a high CH4 to CO2 ratio (equal to 1.57) and was almost undiluted.

4. Conclusions

In the present work, the time-on-stream stability of Ni/Al and Ni/modAl catalysts was examined for the reaction of the dry reforming of biogas. The study focused on the correlation between deactivation and carbon deposition. In particular, for both spent catalysts, TGA and Raman results proved that the degree of coke graphitization increased with higher reaction temperatures. The use of CaO and MgO as modifiers helped obtain coke deposits that were less graphitic in type. The TEM analysis showed that both catalysts contained graphitic structures in the shape of carbon nanotubes and co-existent amorphous carbon. The HR-TEM images showed in a clear manner the defects of the CNTs formed onto the spent Ni/modAl catalyst. The time-on-stream tests showed that deactivation for the modified catalyst was less pronounced for all reaction temperatures. Thus, the modification of Al2O3 with CaO and MgO helped maintain the Ni0 phase during the reaction (due to stronger active phase-support interactions) and improved the deposited carbon gasification via the reverse Boudouard reaction. The latter was achieved by an enhancement of CO2 adsorption on the catalyst’s increased surface basic sites.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.D.C.; data curation, G.I.S., V.S., S.J.H., V.G.P., W.W.; formal analysis, N.D.C., G.I.S., M.A.B., K.P.; funding acquisition, M.A.G., V.G.P., W.W.; methodology, N.D.C.; project administration, N.D.C., M.A.G.; project coordination, M.A.G.; resources, M.A.G.; supervision, N.D.C.; writing—original draft, G.I.S.; writing—review and editing, N.D.C., M.A.B., K.P., M.A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This research has been co-financed by the European Union and Greek national funds under the call “Greece—China Call for Proposals for Joint RT&D Projects” (Project code: T7DKI-00388).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Goula, M.A.; Charisiou, N.D.; Papageridis, K.N.; Delimitis, A.; Pachatouridou, E.; Iliopoulou, E.F. Nickel on alumina catalysts for the production of hydrogen rich mixtures via the biogas dry reforming reaction: Influence of the synthesis method. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 9183–9200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Charisiou, N.D.; Siakavelas, G.; Papageridis, K.N.; Baklavaridis, A.; Tzounis, L.; Avraam, D.G.; Goula, M.A. Syngas production via the biogas dry reforming reaction over nickel supported on modified with CeO2 and/or La2O3 alumina catalysts. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2016, 31, 164–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Goula, M.A.; Charisiou, N.D.; Siakavelas, G.; Tzounis, L.; Tsiaoussis, I.; Panagiotopoulou, P.; Goula, G.; Yentekakis, I.V. Syngas production via the biogas dry reforming reaction over Ni supported on zirconia modified with CeO2 or La2O3 catalysts. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 13724–13740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Italiano, C.; Balzarotti, R.; Vita, A.; Latorrata, S.; Fabiano, C.; Pino, L.; Cristiani, C. Preparation of structured catalysts with Ni and Ni-Rh/CeO2 catalytic layers for syngas production by biogas reforming processes. Catal. Today 2016, 273, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Juan-Juan, J.; Roman-Martinez, M.C.; Illan-Gomez, M.J. Nickel catalyst activation in the carbon dioxide reforming of methane: Effect of pretreatments. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2009, 355, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Montoya, J.A.; Romero-Pascual, E.; Gimon, C.; Del Angel, P.; Monzon, A. Methane reforming with CO2 over Ni/ZrO2-CeO2 catalysts prepared by sol-gel. Catal. Today 2000, 63, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhan, Y.; Han, J.; Bao, Z.; Cao, B.; Li, Y.; Street, J.; Yu, F. Recent advances in dry reforming of methane over Ni-based catalysts. Mol. Catal. 2017, 436, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kathiraser, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ang, M.L.; Mo, L.; Li, Z.; Oemar, U.; Kawi, S. Highly active and coke resistant Ni/SiO2 catalysts for oxidative reforming of model biogas: Effect of low ceria loading. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 19, 284–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vasiliades, M.A.; Makri, M.M.; Djinovic, P.; Erjavec, B.; Pintar, A.; Efstathiou, A.M. Dry reforming of methane over 5wt% Ni/Ce1-xPrxO2-δ catalysts: Performance and characterisation of active and inactive carbon by transient isotopic techniques. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2016, 197, 168–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bellido, J.D.A.; Assaf, E.M. Effect of the Y2O3-ZrO2 support composition on nickel catalyst evaluated in dry reforming of methane. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2009, 352, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rezaei, M.; Alavi, S.M.; Sahebdelfar, S.; Yan, Z.-F. Effects of K2O promoter on the activity and stability of nickel catalysts supported on mesoporous nanocrystalline zirconia in CH4 reforming with CO2. Energy Fuel 2008, 22, 2195–2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Charisiou, N.D.; Papageridis, K.N.; Tzounis, L.; Sebastian, V.; Baker, M.A.; Hinder, S.J.; AlKetbi, M.; Polychronopoulou, K.; Goula, M.A. Ni supported on CaO-MgO-Al2O3 as a highly selective and stable catalyst for H2 production via the glycerol steam reforming reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 256–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Velasquez, M.; Batiot-Dupeyrat, C.; Gallego, L.; Santamaria, A. Chemical and morphological characterization of multi-walled-carbon nanotubes synthesized by carbon deposition from an ethanol-glycerol blend. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2014, 50, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Awadallah, A.E.; Aboul-Enein, A.A.; El-Desouki, D.S.; Aboul-Gheit, A.K. Catalytic thermal decomposition of methane to COx-free hydrogen and carbon nanotubes over MgO supported bimetallic group VIII catalysts. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 296, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sutthiumporn, K.; Kawi, S. Promotional effect of alkaline earth over Ni-La2O3 catalyst for CO2 reforming of CH4: Role of surface oxygen species on H2 production and carbon suppression. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 14435–14446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pore size distribution and N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (inset) of the reduced and spent (a) Ni/Al and (b) Ni/modAl catalysts at 600, 700, and 800 °C.
Figure 1. Pore size distribution and N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (inset) of the reduced and spent (a) Ni/Al and (b) Ni/modAl catalysts at 600, 700, and 800 °C.
Chemproc 02 00015 g001
Figure 2. Raman spectra of spent (a) Ni/Al and (b) Ni/modAl catalysts.
Figure 2. Raman spectra of spent (a) Ni/Al and (b) Ni/modAl catalysts.
Chemproc 02 00015 g002
Figure 3. (a) CH4 and (b) CO2 conversion (%) and (c) H2 yield (%) for the Ni/Al and Ni/modAl catalysts for stability tests conducted at different temperatures.
Figure 3. (a) CH4 and (b) CO2 conversion (%) and (c) H2 yield (%) for the Ni/Al and Ni/modAl catalysts for stability tests conducted at different temperatures.
Chemproc 02 00015 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Charisiou, N.D.; Siakavelas, G.I.; Sebastian, V.; Hinder, S.J.; Baker, M.A.; Papadakis, V.G.; Wang, W.; Polychronopoulou, K.; Goula, M.A. Structural Investigation of the Carbon Deposits on Ni/Al2O3 Catalyst Modified by CaO-MgO for the Biogas Dry Reforming Reaction. Chem. Proc. 2020, 2, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECCS2020-07569

AMA Style

Charisiou ND, Siakavelas GI, Sebastian V, Hinder SJ, Baker MA, Papadakis VG, Wang W, Polychronopoulou K, Goula MA. Structural Investigation of the Carbon Deposits on Ni/Al2O3 Catalyst Modified by CaO-MgO for the Biogas Dry Reforming Reaction. Chemistry Proceedings. 2020; 2(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECCS2020-07569

Chicago/Turabian Style

Charisiou, Nikolaos D., Georgios I. Siakavelas, Victor Sebastian, Steven J. Hinder, Mark A. Baker, Vagelis G. Papadakis, Wen Wang, Kyriaki Polychronopoulou, and Maria A. Goula. 2020. "Structural Investigation of the Carbon Deposits on Ni/Al2O3 Catalyst Modified by CaO-MgO for the Biogas Dry Reforming Reaction" Chemistry Proceedings 2, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECCS2020-07569

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop