Chemo-Selective Protection of Aldehydes Functional Group Catalyzed by MOFs †

: A metal-organic framework Zn 2 (BDC) 2 (DABCO) was employed as a reusable heterogeneous acidic catalyst in the acylation reaction of various benzaldehydes with acetic anhydride under microwave irradiation. The outstanding features of this efﬁcient solvent-free method are short reaction time, ease of product separation, greatest yields, and the ability to reuse the catalyst several times.


Introduction
In order to carry out the selective reactions in the desired position during multi-step procedures, it is necessary to protect parts of the molecules with various functional groups so that they do not participate in the main reaction and also prevent the production of side products [1]. Compounds containing aldehydic carbonyl groups are commonly protected by transforming them into acetals, dithioacetal, oxathioacetals, and diacetate (acylal) [2]. The characteristic of stability in neutral environments, the comfort of preparation, and multiple applications, including as initiating materials for the Diels-Alder reaction, intermediates in industrial processes, and geminal diacetates (acylals), have been highlighted among the various protection approaches of aldehydes [2,3]. Ethanethiol, acetic anhydride, and alcohol are some of the reagents used to protect aldehydes [4]. The use of protic or Lewis acid catalysts such as AC-N-SO 4 H [5], magnetic Fe 3 O 4 @C-600-SO 3 H microspheres [6], SiO 2 -NaHSO 4 [7], STO/Al-P [8], poly(p-hydroxybenzaldehyde-co-p-phenol sulfonate) [9], tungstosulfonic acid (TSA) [3], hexabromoacetone (HBA) [1], (MNPs-PSA) [2], and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pentafluorphenylporphyrin) iron (III) chloride (Fe 5 F) [10] play an essential role in the better progress of the chemo-selective reactions. Heterogeneous acid catalysts have advantages over their homogeneous types, such as simple separation via straightforward filtration, possible reuse, and convenient provision, which make them an ideal choice for catalyzing synthesis reactions [4]. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a new type of hybrid material composed of metal nodes and organic ligands [11,12]. Since ligands and constituent metals are available in a wide variety, these versatile and adjustable crystalline structures can be used for a variety of applications [13], including gas absorption and storage [14,15], hydrocarbon separation [16], luminescence [17,18], sensors [19,20], drug delivery [21,22], energy storage [23], enzyme encapsulation [24,25], and catalysts [26]. In recent years, many studies have discussed the application of MOFs as heterogeneous catalysts in multi-step synthesis reactions, especially in the liquid phase. It has been found that the stability of the structure of MOFs in different chemical conditions, the presence of positive metal ions, high porosity, and high surface-to-volume ratio, and the various preparation methods significantly contribute to the appropriate catalytic performance of the MOFs [27]. Continuing our efforts to investigate the catalytic performance of MOFs, we and the various preparation methods significantly contribute to the appropriate catalytic performance of the MOFs [27]. Continuing our efforts to investigate the catalytic performance of MOFs, we report a simple and efficient approach for protecting the carbonyl group in a range of benzaldehyde compounds using M2(BDC)2(DABCO) as a Lewis acid catalyst under microwave irradiation conditions (Scheme 1).

Materials and Methods
For the protection of benzaldehydes with acetic anhydride under microwave irradiation, the general procedure was as follows: 3 mmol acetic anhydrides, 1 mmol benzaldehyde, and 0.03 g M2(BDC)2(DABCO) (M = Ni, Cu, Co, and Zn) catalyst were added into a flask and then exposed to microwave irradiation. The progress of the reaction was observed by GC. After the ending of the reaction, dichloromethane (3 × 5 mL) was added to the reaction mixture and the catalyst was separated via filtration. The organic phase was washed with saturated KHCO3 solution (15 mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure in a rotary evaporator to afford the crude product. The yields were isolated and calculated as mmol of purified product with respect to mmol of initial benzaldehydes.

Results and Discussion
To determine which catalyst is the best for the acylation of benzaldehyde, 1 mmol benzaldehyde was examined with 3 mmol acetic anhydrides in the presence of 10 mg MOFs such as Ni2(BDC)2(DABCO), Cu2(BDC)2(DABCO), Co2(BDC)2(DABCO), and Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO), under both room temperature and microwave conditions (Table 1). With respect to the time and reaction yield, Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) was the best among the others under microwave irradiation conditions. In addition, the reaction in solventfree conditions and ambient temperature in the presence of different amounts of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst, including 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg, and various quantities of

Materials and Methods
For the protection of benzaldehydes with acetic anhydride under microwave irradiation, the general procedure was as follows: 3 mmol acetic anhydrides, 1 mmol benzaldehyde, and 0.03 g M 2 (BDC) 2 (DABCO) (M = Ni, Cu, Co, and Zn) catalyst were added into a flask and then exposed to microwave irradiation. The progress of the reaction was observed by GC. After the ending of the reaction, dichloromethane (3 × 5 mL) was added to the reaction mixture and the catalyst was separated via filtration. The organic phase was washed with saturated KHCO 3 solution (15 mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO 4 , and concentrated under reduced pressure in a rotary evaporator to afford the crude product. The yields were isolated and calculated as mmol of purified product with respect to mmol of initial benzaldehydes.

Results and Discussion
To determine which catalyst is the best for the acylation of benzaldehyde, 1 mmol benzaldehyde was examined with 3 mmol acetic anhydrides in the presence of 10 mg MOFs such as Ni 2 (BDC) 2 (DABCO), Cu 2 (BDC) 2 (DABCO), Co 2 (BDC) 2 (DABCO), and Zn 2 (BDC) 2 (DABCO), under both room temperature and microwave conditions (Table 1). With respect to the time and reaction yield, Zn 2 (BDC) 2 (DABCO) was the best among the others under microwave irradiation conditions. In addition, the reaction in solvent-free conditions and ambient temperature in the presence of different amounts of Zn 2 (BDC) 2 (DABCO) catalyst, including 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg, and various quantities of acetic anhydride, including 1, 2, 3, and 4 mmol, was investigated. The results indicated that the optimum amounts of catalyst and acetic anhydride are 30 mg and 3 mmol, respectively. To assess the solvent effect, acylation of benzaldehyde (1 mmol) with acetic anhydride (3 mmol) in the presence of 30 mg of Zn 2 (BDC) 2 (DABCO) catalyst was analyzed as a model reaction under different environmental conditions ( Table 2). acetic anhydride, including 1, 2, 3, and 4 mmol, was investigated. The results indicated that the optimum amounts of catalyst and acetic anhydride are 30 mg and 3 mmol, respectively. To assess the solvent effect, acylation of benzaldehyde (1 mmol) with acetic anhydride (3 mmol) in the presence of 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst was analyzed as a model reaction under different environmental conditions (Table 2). In terms of time and reaction yield, the best conditions were found in entry 7. The reaction was completed in just 7 min under microwave irradiation and in the solvent-free condition with 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) used as the catalyst. Inspired by our introductory results, we subjected numerous amounts of benzaldehydes to acylation under the optimized conditions with the Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst as summarized in Table 3. In terms of time and reaction yield, the best conditions were found in entry 7. The reaction was completed in just 7 min under microwave irradiation and in the solventfree condition with 30 mg of Zn 2 (BDC) 2 (DABCO) used as the catalyst. Inspired by our introductory results, we subjected numerous amounts of benzaldehydes to acylation under the optimized conditions with the Zn 2 (BDC) 2 (DABCO) catalyst as summarized in Table 3. Table 3. Acylated derivatives of benzaldehydes in the presence of MOF a .

Entry
Substrate Product Time (min) Yield (%) b 1 acetic anhydride, including 1, 2, 3, and 4 mmol, was investigated. The results indicated that the optimum amounts of catalyst and acetic anhydride are 30 mg and 3 mmol, respectively. To assess the solvent effect, acylation of benzaldehyde (1 mmol) with acetic anhydride (3 mmol) in the presence of 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst was analyzed as a model reaction under different environmental conditions (Table 2). In terms of time and reaction yield, the best conditions were found in entry 7. The reaction was completed in just 7 min under microwave irradiation and in the solvent-free condition with 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) used as the catalyst. Inspired by our introductory results, we subjected numerous amounts of benzaldehydes to acylation under the optimized conditions with the Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst as summarized in Table 3. acetic anhydride, including 1, 2, 3, and 4 mmol, was investigated. The results indicated that the optimum amounts of catalyst and acetic anhydride are 30 mg and 3 mmol, respectively. To assess the solvent effect, acylation of benzaldehyde (1 mmol) with acetic anhydride (3 mmol) in the presence of 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst was analyzed as a model reaction under different environmental conditions (Table 2). In terms of time and reaction yield, the best conditions were found in entry 7. The reaction was completed in just 7 min under microwave irradiation and in the solvent-free condition with 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) used as the catalyst. Inspired by our introductory results, we subjected numerous amounts of benzaldehydes to acylation under the optimized conditions with the Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst as summarized in Table 3. acetic anhydride, including 1, 2, 3, and 4 mmol, was investigated. The results indicated that the optimum amounts of catalyst and acetic anhydride are 30 mg and 3 mmol, respectively. To assess the solvent effect, acylation of benzaldehyde (1 mmol) with acetic anhydride (3 mmol) in the presence of 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst was analyzed as a model reaction under different environmental conditions (Table 2). In terms of time and reaction yield, the best conditions were found in entry 7. The reaction was completed in just 7 min under microwave irradiation and in the solvent-free condition with 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) used as the catalyst. Inspired by our introductory results, we subjected numerous amounts of benzaldehydes to acylation under the optimized conditions with the Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst as summarized in Table 3. acetic anhydride, including 1, 2, 3, and 4 mmol, was investigated. The results indicated that the optimum amounts of catalyst and acetic anhydride are 30 mg and 3 mmol, respectively. To assess the solvent effect, acylation of benzaldehyde (1 mmol) with acetic anhydride (3 mmol) in the presence of 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst was analyzed as a model reaction under different environmental conditions (Table 2). In terms of time and reaction yield, the best conditions were found in entry 7. The reaction was completed in just 7 min under microwave irradiation and in the solvent-free condition with 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) used as the catalyst. Inspired by our introductory results, we subjected numerous amounts of benzaldehydes to acylation under the optimized conditions with the Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst as summarized in Table 3. acetic anhydride, including 1, 2, 3, and 4 mmol, was investigated. The results indicated that the optimum amounts of catalyst and acetic anhydride are 30 mg and 3 mmol, respectively. To assess the solvent effect, acylation of benzaldehyde (1 mmol) with acetic anhydride (3 mmol) in the presence of 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst was analyzed as a model reaction under different environmental conditions (Table 2). In terms of time and reaction yield, the best conditions were found in entry 7. The reaction was completed in just 7 min under microwave irradiation and in the solvent-free condition with 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) used as the catalyst. Inspired by our introductory results, we subjected numerous amounts of benzaldehydes to acylation under the optimized conditions with the Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst as summarized in Table 3. acetic anhydride, including 1, 2, 3, and 4 mmol, was investigated. The results indicated that the optimum amounts of catalyst and acetic anhydride are 30 mg and 3 mmol, respectively. To assess the solvent effect, acylation of benzaldehyde (1 mmol) with acetic anhydride (3 mmol) in the presence of 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst was analyzed as a model reaction under different environmental conditions (Table 2). In terms of time and reaction yield, the best conditions were found in entry 7. The reaction was completed in just 7 min under microwave irradiation and in the solvent-free condition with 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) used as the catalyst. Inspired by our introductory results, we subjected numerous amounts of benzaldehydes to acylation under the optimized conditions with the Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst as summarized in Table 3. acetic anhydride, including 1, 2, 3, and 4 mmol, was investigated. The results indicated that the optimum amounts of catalyst and acetic anhydride are 30 mg and 3 mmol, respectively. To assess the solvent effect, acylation of benzaldehyde (1 mmol) with acetic anhydride (3 mmol) in the presence of 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst was analyzed as a model reaction under different environmental conditions (Table 2). In terms of time and reaction yield, the best conditions were found in entry 7. The reaction was completed in just 7 min under microwave irradiation and in the solvent-free condition with 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) used as the catalyst. Inspired by our introductory results, we subjected numerous amounts of benzaldehydes to acylation under the optimized conditions with the Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst as summarized in Table 3. acetic anhydride, including 1, 2, 3, and 4 mmol, was investigated. The results indicated that the optimum amounts of catalyst and acetic anhydride are 30 mg and 3 mmol, respectively. To assess the solvent effect, acylation of benzaldehyde (1 mmol) with acetic anhydride (3 mmol) in the presence of 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst was analyzed as a model reaction under different environmental conditions (Table 2). In terms of time and reaction yield, the best conditions were found in entry 7. The reaction was completed in just 7 min under microwave irradiation and in the solvent-free condition with 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) used as the catalyst. Inspired by our introductory results, we subjected numerous amounts of benzaldehydes to acylation under the optimized conditions with the Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst as summarized in Table 3. acetic anhydride, including 1, 2, 3, and 4 mmol, was investigated. The results indicated that the optimum amounts of catalyst and acetic anhydride are 30 mg and 3 mmol, respectively. To assess the solvent effect, acylation of benzaldehyde (1 mmol) with acetic anhydride (3 mmol) in the presence of 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst was analyzed as a model reaction under different environmental conditions (Table 2). In terms of time and reaction yield, the best conditions were found in entry 7. The reaction was completed in just 7 min under microwave irradiation and in the solvent-free condition with 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) used as the catalyst. Inspired by our introductory results, we subjected numerous amounts of benzaldehydes to acylation under the optimized conditions with the Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst as summarized in Table 3. acetic anhydride, including 1, 2, 3, and 4 mmol, was investigated. The results indicated that the optimum amounts of catalyst and acetic anhydride are 30 mg and 3 mmol, respectively. To assess the solvent effect, acylation of benzaldehyde (1 mmol) with acetic anhydride (3 mmol) in the presence of 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst was analyzed as a model reaction under different environmental conditions (Table 2). In terms of time and reaction yield, the best conditions were found in entry 7. The reaction was completed in just 7 min under microwave irradiation and in the solvent-free condition with 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) used as the catalyst. Inspired by our introductory results, we subjected numerous amounts of benzaldehydes to acylation under the optimized conditions with the Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst as summarized in Table 3. acetic anhydride, including 1, 2, 3, and 4 mmol, was investigated. The results indicated that the optimum amounts of catalyst and acetic anhydride are 30 mg and 3 mmol, respectively. To assess the solvent effect, acylation of benzaldehyde (1 mmol) with acetic anhydride (3 mmol) in the presence of 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst was analyzed as a model reaction under different environmental conditions (Table 2). In terms of time and reaction yield, the best conditions were found in entry 7. The reaction was completed in just 7 min under microwave irradiation and in the solvent-free condition with 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) used as the catalyst. Inspired by our introductory results, we subjected numerous amounts of benzaldehydes to acylation under the optimized conditions with the Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst as summarized in Table 3. acetic anhydride, including 1, 2, 3, and 4 mmol, was investigated. The results indicated that the optimum amounts of catalyst and acetic anhydride are 30 mg and 3 mmol, respectively. To assess the solvent effect, acylation of benzaldehyde (1 mmol) with acetic anhydride (3 mmol) in the presence of 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst was analyzed as a model reaction under different environmental conditions (Table 2). In terms of time and reaction yield, the best conditions were found in entry 7. The reaction was completed in just 7 min under microwave irradiation and in the solvent-free condition with 30 mg of Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) used as the catalyst. Inspired by our introductory results, we subjected numerous amounts of benzaldehydes to acylation under the optimized conditions with the Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) catalyst as summarized in Table 3.

Conclusions
In summary, it was found that the catalytic activity of the organic metal framework Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) under solvent-free conditions and microwave irradiation is significant in the protection reactions of benzaldehydes. The unique advantages of this protocol

Conclusions
In summary, it was found that the catalytic activity of the organic metal framework Zn2(BDC)2(DABCO) under solvent-free conditions and microwave irradiation is significant in the protection reactions of benzaldehydes. The unique advantages of this protocol

Conclusions
In summary, it was found that the catalytic activity of the organic metal framework Zn 2 (BDC) 2 (DABCO) under solvent-free conditions and microwave irradiation is significant in the protection reactions of benzaldehydes. The unique advantages of this protocol include short reaction time, ability to recover and reuse the catalyst, solvent-free conditions, high efficiency, and simple method.