A Novel ppb-Level Sensitive and Highly Selective Europium-Based Diketone Luminescent Sensor for the Quantitative Detection of Aluminum Ions in Water Samples

: A novel Eu(tta) 3 ([4,4 (cid:48)


Introduction
In recent years, there has been growing interest among researchers in the development of highly selective and sensitive luminescent optical sensors, due to their potential use in a variety of real-life applications, including clinical, medical, environmental, and living systems [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].These sensors are notably appealing due to their capability to discern various metal ions, encompassing a spectrum of transition and hazardous metal ions, rendering them highly valuable for a wide array of practical applications [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].Among these ions, aluminum is the most abundant in the Earth's crust and is extensively used in day-to-day life [8,9].However, aluminum is not an essential element for the human body and can bind with proteins that have the capacity to carry iron [10].The main sources of aluminum uptake in the human body are food additives, occupational ducts, pharmaceuticals, and cooking equipment [8,9].Excessive intake of aluminum can lead to adverse effects [10], including central nervous system damage that can result in Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease, due to unregulated Al 3+ ions in the human body [7].Additionally, excessive intake of aluminum ions can damage the kidneys [11] and work as a competitive inhibitor for essential ions, including Fe 2+ , Mg 2+ , and Ca 2+ [12].As a result, the development of highly selective and sensitive luminescent optical sensors for the detection of aluminum ions has become an important area of research, with potential implications for a variety of practical applications.
Various analytical techniques, such as atomic absorption spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy, have traditionally been employed as the primary detection methods for sensing Al 3+ ions.However, these methods are expensive, complicated, and require pretreatment steps and specialized instruments [13,14].Luminescence spectroscopy, on the other hand, is a more favorable method due to its operational simplicity, instant response, high selectivity, and non-destructive nature for living cells [13,14].Nevertheless, compared to other heavy-metal ions, the detection of Al 3+ ions presents unique challenges due to their poor coordination ability and lack of spectroscopic character [7].Most of the previously reported fluorophores for detecting aluminum ions have suffered from complex synthesis procedures, insolubility in polar solvents, shorter luminescent lifetimes, narrow energy gaps, and interferences from other metals, such as Cu 2+ , Co 2+ , and Cd 2+ [7,14].Therefore, developing a reliable and practical luminescence-based sensing method for detecting Al 3+  ions is an ongoing challenge in the field of analytical chemistry.
The detection of aluminum content in water is of great importance.In 1989, the World Health Organization declared aluminum ions as a food pollutant and set a limit of 200 µg L −1 (200 ppb, 7.41 µM) for drinking water [6,15].High concentrations of aluminum in the atmosphere, soil, and water can have adverse effects on the growth of plants and animals [13].Improperly treated water can also pose serious threats to patients with chronic renal disease [12].Nearly 40% of acidified soil worldwide is the result of water-soluble aluminum ion leaching [16].Aluminum carbonate, aluminum oxide, and aluminum nitride are the primary components of aluminum production waste (APW), which is often disposed of in landfills.Despite remaining dormant for years, landfilled APW can react exothermically with water-soluble leaching from the APW matrix, resulting in toxic soil [16,17].All of this information underscores the critical need to detect Al 3+ ions selectively and quantitatively in water.
Luminescence-based aluminum probes have been developed using various approaches.Most of the sensor molecules are metal-free organic molecules that recognize and rearrange the molecule in the presence of aluminum ions (guest) via covalent interactions [6][7][8][9]11,12,15].Some probes utilize gold nanoparticles for aluminum ion detection [10,18].Metal-based complexes for aluminum ion detection are not widely reported in the literature, as metalated complexes may undergo trans-metalation.However, such complexes can exhibit not only effective aluminum sensing properties but also function as aluminum ion removers [19].
Lanthanide complexes have found utility not only in the detection of metal ions, such as Al 3+ , K + , and Zn 2+ , but also in anion and gas [10,[20][21][22][23].However, due to the Laporteforbidden nature of f-f transitions [24], lanthanide complexes exhibit weak luminescence, characterized by low extinction coefficients typically in the range of 0.5-3 L mol −1 cm −1 [24].Consequently, the luminescence of lanthanide cations necessitates the use of ligand sensitization [24].Sensitizer ligands typically consist of aromatic or unsaturated organic molecules with anionic or dipolar properties to facilitate effective binding to the +3 metal center [25].
For this process to be successful, the ligand must meet a crucial prerequisite: the energy gap between the ligand's triplet state and the lanthanide's emitting excited state (e.g., 5 D 0 for Europium) should fall within the range of 4000 ± 500 cm −1 for efficient energy transfer [25].If the energy gap is less than 1500 cm −1 , energy loss due to thermal deactivation may occur [24,25].Conversely, if the gap is too large, it can adversely affect the efficiency of the energy transfer [24].Known sensitizers for lanthanide complexes include 2,2 -bipyridines, terpyridines, dipicolinic acid, salicylic acid, benzoate, triphenylenes, substituted phenyl, naphthyl groups, 1,10-phenanthroline, and thenoyltrifluoroacetone [20,24,25].In this study, thenoyltrifluoroacetone (tta) and bipyridine-based ligands are employed for sensitization.In the initial step of the sensitization, the ligands, acting as an antenna, absorb energy in the UV/visible region and transfer this energy to their triplet state via inter-system crossing (ISC).Subsequently, this energy is transferred to the excited state of the lanthanide(III) metal [23].In sensing applications, the lanthanide-ligand complex serves as a receptor, with changes in the luminescence properties of the lanthanide(III) metal being induced by the binding analyte [25].The bound ligand not only shields the lanthanides from solvent quenching but also enhances the analyte binding affinity and contributes to sensitization [25].The variability in the lifetimes of lanthanide ions, spanning from microseconds (e.g., Yb 3+ ; Nd 3+ ) to milliseconds (e.g., Eu 3+ ; Tb 3+ ), renders them more advantageous for sensor applications [24].
Eu (III) complexes have gained significant prominence as chemosensors in the literature.This heightened interest is primarily attributed to their exceptional qualities as sensors, including high luminous efficiency, long-wavelength emission, and extended lifetimes [14,20].Additionally, Eu (III) exhibits a ground state ( 7 F 0 ) and emitting excited state ( 5 D 0 ) that remains unaffected by crystal-field effects, boasting low J values in the 7 F J ground state, which greatly simplifies spectrum interpretation [26].Eu (III) is known for its characteristic line-like emission, which is particularly advantageous for radiometric analysis within the Eu (III) emission spectrum.Typically, in such analyses, the ∆J = 2 emission at 615 nm and ∆J = 1 emission at 590 nm are commonly employed [23].
Eu (III) complexes have been effectively employed as chemosensors for the detection of diverse analytes.In 2023, our research group introduced a novel Europium-based complex, K[Eu(hfa) 4 ], for the detection of dissolved carbon dioxide in an ethylene glycol medium, showcasing its practical utility by enabling real-time monitoring of fermentation reactions [20].This work leverages the environmental sensitivity of Eu(III) emission and indirectly senses CO 2 via changes in pH in the medium [20].In 2021, Xu et al. demonstrated the utility of Europium(III)-carbon quantum dots complexes as sensors for mercury (Hg 2+ ) in milk.This complex exhibits dual emissions at 443 and 617 nm, with emission enhancement upon the addition of Hg 2+ ions [27].Furthermore, in 2010, Chen et al. synthesized a novel ternary complex based on 2-(2-carboxylphenyl)imidazo[4,5-f]-1,10-phenanthrolinebased europium(III) 2-thenoyltrifluoroacetonate.This complex was designed for sensing multiple anions, including F − , HSO 4 − , and AcO − .The initial red emission of the sensor changes in response to different anions, owing to hydrogen bonding and competitive coordination with the Eu(III) metal center [28].
Trans-metalation is a thermodynamically driven reaction wherein one organometallic complex transfers its ligands to another metal [29].Depending on the design, this type of reaction can lead to the generation of two distinct emissions, each associated with the characteristics of the respective metals [30,31].Alternatively, one metal can act as a quencher, while the other forms the luminescence complex [32].In the latter method, paramagnetic metals such as Cu 2+ and Mn 2+ are frequently employed as quenchers [33][34][35].This method finds utility not only in sensing applications but also in organometallic synthesis, catalysis, nanomaterials, metal-organic frameworks, and various other fields [29].However, the number of reported organometallic complexes serving as chemosensors utilizing transmetalation reactions remains limited [29].This type of reaction can potentially enhance selectivity due to the shielding function of the newly introduced metal ion [29].Additionally, the use of different metals with the same ligands may result in distinct thermodynamic sensing properties [29].Chemosensors involving Cu/Cd [30], Cu/Cr [32], Cu/Zn [33], Zn/Cd [36], and Zn/Hg [37] replacement reactions have been documented.Most sensing systems based on trans-metalation employ one metal for emission quenching, which is not the most efficient approach for emission enhancement [29].In our study, we have developed an Eu-based sensor that exhibits two distinct emissions from Eu 3+ and Al 3+ complexes, thereby promoting an emission enhancement method.

Experimental Section
Materials: The following chemicals are obtained from Sigma Aldrich with the highest available purity and used without further purification: Europium(III) chloride hexahydrate, thenoyltrifluoroacetone, 4,4 -Di-tert-butyl-2,2 -dipyridyl, 1000 mg/L aluminum Standard for ICP in nitric acid, ACS-graded methanol.
Physical measurements: Steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra are acquired with a PTI QuantaMaster Model QM-4 scanning spectrofluorometer (HORIBA Instruments Inc., Piscataway, NJ, USA) equipped with a 75-watt xenon arc lamp, the pH measurements are made using a Sper Scientific 840087 Basic pH Meter.Single crystal X-ray diffraction data are obtained on a Rigaku XtaLAB Synergy-S Diffractometer equipped with dual Mo and Cu PhotonJet-S microfocus X-ray sources, a HyPix-6000HE Hybrid Photon Counting detector, and an Oxford Cryostream 800 liquid nitrogen cooling system.Further details about the crystal structure can be found in the Supporting Information.Raman spectra are recorded on a Renishaw InVia system equipped with 785 nm excitation laser, a 1800 L/mm grating and a CCD detector, affording a spectral resolution of 0.2 cm −1 .ICP-OES analysis is performed on an iCAP 7000 plus series ICP-OES system (software: QTEGRA).
Synthesis of the [Eu(tta) 3 ([4,4 -(t-Bu) 2 ]-2,2 -bpy)]: Synthesis of the complex is carried out following a reported procedure [38] with slight modifications.Europium(III) chloride hexahydrate (0.1 g, 0.3 mmol), thenoyltrifluoroacetone (0.198 g, 0.9 mmol), and 4,4 -Di-tertbutyl-2,2 -dipyridyl (0.79 g, 0.1 mmol) are dissolved separately in 5 mL, 2 mL and 2 mL of ethanol, respectively.Then, thenoyltrifluoroacetone solution is added to the Europium (III) chloride hexahydrate solution and mixed well.The pH of the solution is adjusted to 8 by the dropwise addition of triethylamine.After that, the 4,4 -Di-tert-butyl-2,2 -dipyridyl solution is added dropwise to the mixture and stirred at room temperature for one day till a white precipitate forms.The precipitate is filtered and dried under vacuum for 12 h.The yield is 52.5%.Crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments are obtained by slow evaporation of the acetone-ethanol solvent.The product is characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (sc-XRD) and 1 H NMR.
Aluminum titration: In all the experiments, the concentration of complex 1 is kept at 1.84 × 10 −6 M (0.0496 ppm).The ICP grade 1000 ppm aluminum solution is diluted to 1 ppm with methanol.A volume of 10 µL of the 1 ppm aluminum standard solution is added to 2 mL of complex 1 (1.84 × 10 −6 M) solution until saturation.The experiment is repeated three times.
pH studies: An amount of 1 mg of complex 1 is dissolved in methanol to prepare the 1.84 × 10 −6 M (0.0496 ppm) solution.Acetic acid and ammonium hydroxide (both at 0.1 M) are used to adjust the pH.The experiments are triplicated.
Selectivity studies: A volume of 50 µL of 0.1 M metal salt solutions is added to 2 mL of 1.84 × 10 −6 M (0.0496 ppm) complex 1 solution.Emission spectra are recorded at 398 nm.
Interference studies: The interference study is conducted in two different ways.In the first method, 2 mL of 1.84 × 10 −6 M (0.0496 ppm) complex 1 is mixed with 10 µL of 0.1 M metal salt solution, followed by 10 µL of 0.1 M Al 3+ solution.This procedure is carried out separately for each metal ion.The second approach involved the sequential addition of 10 µL of 0.1 M metal ions to a 2 mL solution of complex 1 in methanol, initially starting with 0.1 M aluminum ions before introducing any other metal ions.The concentration of complex 1 in the solution is 1.84 × 10 −6 M (0.0496 ppm).
ICP-OES study: An amount of 5 ppm of aluminum standard solution is prepared using ICP grade 1000 ppm aluminum solution.The prepared 5 ppm solution is used to make the standard and unknown solutions.Finally, 0.2 mL of ICP-graded HNO 3 is added to each solution.A 309.27 nm peak is used for the calibration study.For the parallel PL study, 3 mL of all the prepared solutions are saved before the addition of HNO 3 acid.
Molar ratio method to determine the stoichiometric ratio of Al 3+ and complex 1: The experiment was performed according to a literature procedure [39][40][41].The experiment was started with a fixed volume of complex 1 (1.84 × 10 −6 M, 2 mL) and added an increasing volume of 1 ppm of Al 3+ solution to achieve the different combinations of Al 3+ /complex 1 molar ratio.
Quantitative detection of Al 3+ in aluminum-containing water samples as a real-time application.A volume of 10 µL of aluminum-containing water is added to 2 mL of complex 1 (1.84 × 10 −6 M) in methanol.After that, the change in luminescence is recorded.
Relative quantum yield measurement: The experiment is performed following the literature procedure [42,43].A 3.67 × 10 −7 M solution of quinine sulfate (QS) is prepared in 0.1 M HCl and the sensor solution is prepared by adding 1 ppm AlCl 3 solution to 1 × 10 −6 M of Complex 1 solution.Absorption and emission studies are carried out for both standard and sample under similar experimental conditions.The Al 3+ sensor sample and the quinine sulfate standard are excited at 300 nm for exhibiting comparable absorbance.

Results and Discussions
Complex 1 is characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (sc-XRD, Figure 1) and 1 H NMR (Figure S1) techniques.The XRD analysis unveils the structure, wherein the Eu (III) center coordinates with six oxygens atoms from three tta (thenoyltrifluoroacetone) ligands and two nitrogen atoms from a ([4,4 -(t-bu) 2 -2,2 -bpy) ligand, affording an octahedral coordination field for Eu.The average bond lengths for Eu-O and Eu-N are 2.358 Å and 2.577 Å, respectively.It is noteworthy that the specific bond lengths between Eu-O and Eu-N exhibit slight variation within the range of 2.35-2.36Å and 2.56-2.63Å, contingent upon the specific ligands employed [44].These measurements closely align with values documented in the existing literature.Furthermore, the O-Eu-O bond angles displayed deviations from the ideal 90 • and 180 • , indicative of a subtle geometry distortion from the theoretically perfect octahedral structure (Table S1).

Luminesce properties and trans-metalation
The investigation of the luminescent properties of complex 1 is conducted in methanol at room temperature.The complex exhibits distinct narrow emission bands at 579, 592, 613, and 655 nm, which are assigned to 5 D 0 → 7 F 0 , 5 D 0 → 7 F 1 , 5 D 0 → 7 F 2 , and 5 D 0 → 7 F 3 transitions of the europium metal center.Notably, the 613 nm emission band displays exceptional intensity and is primarily responsible for the bright red color of the solution.Upon introduction of aluminum ions, trans-metalation is observed, marked by the cessation of europium emission ("turned off") and the onset of aluminum complex emission ("turned on") at 398 nm, as depicted in Figure 2.This transformation resulted in a drastic color change in the solution, which is easily distinguishable under a UV lamp even to the naked eye (inset, Figure 2).Further experiments are conducted to explore the interaction between complex 1.The stoichiometry of this interaction is determined using the method, keeping the molar amount of complex 1 constant [39][40][41].The re sively establish a 1:1 ratio between Al 3+ and complex 1 (Figure 3a).Raman (Figure S2a) reveals the emergence of the Al-O bond vibrations at 418, 495, [45] concurrently with the vanishing of the Eu-O and Eu-N bond vibration and 215 cm −1 [46].The emergence of new Al-O bonds strongly suggests the of Al 3+ with the thenoyltrifluoroacetone ligands, while the disappearance of Eu-N bonds indicates the detachment of the ligands from the europium meta is further corroborated by the absence of the 613 nm peak in the luminesce (Figure 2).Moreover, the emergence of a new peak at 653 cm −1 indicates the Al-N bonds derived from the 4,4′-Di-tert-butyl-2,2′-dipyridyl ligand [47,48] Aluminum is known to form six-coordinate complexes with bipyridine-type ands [49,50].With consideration of the Raman data, a possible structure of t complex is depicted in Figure 3b.Further experiments are conducted to explore the interaction between Al 3+ ions and complex 1.The stoichiometry of this interaction is determined using the molar ratio method, keeping the molar amount of complex 1 constant [39][40][41].The results conclusively establish a 1:1 ratio between Al 3+ and complex 1 (Figure 3a).Raman spectroscopy (Figure S2a) reveals the emergence of the Al-O bond vibrations at 418, 495, and 608 cm −1 [45] concurrently with the vanishing of the Eu-O and Eu-N bond vibrations at 186, 205, and 215 cm −1 [46].The emergence of new Al-O bonds strongly suggests the coordination of Al 3+ with the thenoyltrifluoroacetone ligands, while the disappearance of the Eu-O and Eu-N bonds indicates the detachment of the ligands from the europium metal center.This is further corroborated by the absence of the 613 nm peak in the luminescence spectrum (Figure 2).Moreover, the emergence of a new peak at 653 cm −1 indicates the formation of Al-N bonds derived from the 4,4 -Di-tert-butyl-2,2 -dipyridyl ligand [47,48] (Figure S2a).Aluminum is known to form six-coordinate complexes with bipyridine-type bidentate ligands [49,50].With consideration of the Raman data, a possible structure of the aluminum complex is depicted in Figure 3b.pH and binding constant studies The pH investigation aims to assess the sensor's stability across varying pH levels and its applicability in real-world scenarios.The sensor is robust at pH 5-7, particularly promising for bio-related practical uses.Furthermore, it remains stable within the pH range of 5-10, with a noticeable decrease in intensity observed at pH < 5 at 398 nm.(Figure 4, Figure S3).The binding properties of the complex 1 to the aluminum ion are investigated according to the literature.[51,52] The binding constant is obtained from luminescence pH and binding constant studies The pH investigation aims to assess the sensor's stability across varying pH levels and its applicability in real-world scenarios.The sensor is robust at pH 5-7, particularly promising for bio-related practical uses.Furthermore, it remains stable within the pH range of 5-10, with a noticeable decrease in intensity observed at pH < 5 at 398 nm (Figures 4 and S3).pH and binding constant studies The pH investigation aims to assess the sensor's stability across varying pH levels and its applicability in real-world scenarios.The sensor is robust at pH 5-7, particularly promising for bio-related practical uses.Furthermore, it remains stable within the pH range of 5-10, with a noticeable decrease in intensity observed at pH < 5 at 398 nm.(Figure 4, Figure S3).The binding properties of the complex 1 to the aluminum ion are investigated according to the literature.[51,52] The binding constant is obtained from luminescence The binding properties of the complex 1 to the aluminum ion are investigated according to the literature.[51,52] The binding constant is obtained from luminescence spectroscopy (see Figure 5) and UV-Vis (Figure S4) methods separately.They are 2.324 × 10 3 (R 2 = 0.99) and 2.669 × 10 3 , respectively (R 2 = 0.99).The average value for the binging constant is 2.496 × 10 3 ± 172.This is consistent with the aluminum binding constants for similar complexes in the literature [21].
Analytica 2023, 4, FOR PEER REVIEW 8 spectroscopy (see Figure 5) and UV-Vis (Figure S4) methods separately.They are 2.324 × 10 3 (R 2 = 0.99) and 2.669 × 10 3 , respectively (R 2 = 0.99).The average value for the binging constant is 2.496 × 10 3 ± 172.This is consistent with the aluminum binding constants for similar complexes in the literature [21].Sensing of metal ions and selectivity (interference) studies An exceptional sensor is anticipated to demonstrate superior sensing capabilities and specificity towards the analyte, particularly when compared to various common metals.To evaluate the sensing performance towards common metal ions, an extensive screening involving 12 common metal ions-Zn 2+ , Cu 2+ , Co 2+ , Cd 2+ , Pb 2+ , Al 3+ , Ni 2+ , Hg 2+ , K + , Na + , Mg 2+ , and Ca 2+ -in a methanol solution is conducted (Figure S5, Figure 6a).Remarkably, only the Al 3+ ion exhibits a distinct peak at 398 nm (above the baseline), while the other metal ions show no luminescence at that wavelength.This notable result emphasizes the sensor's exceptional ability to detect the Al 3+ ion (Figure 6b).Sensing of metal ions and selectivity (interference) studies An exceptional sensor is anticipated to demonstrate superior sensing capabilities and specificity towards the analyte, particularly when compared to various common metals.To evaluate the sensing performance towards common metal ions, an extensive screening involving 12 common metal ions-Zn 2+ , Cu 2+ , Co 2+ , Cd 2+ , Pb 2+ , Al 3+ , Ni 2+ , Hg 2+ , K + , Na + , Mg 2+ , and Ca 2+ -in a methanol solution is conducted (Figures 6a and S5).Remarkably, only the Al 3+ ion exhibits a distinct peak at 398 nm (above the baseline), while the other metal ions show no luminescence at that wavelength.This notable result emphasizes the sensor's exceptional ability to detect the Al 3+ ion (Figure 6b).
Analytica 2023, 4, FOR PEER REVIEW 8 spectroscopy (see Figure 5) and UV-Vis (Figure S4) methods separately.They are 2.324 × 10 3 (R 2 = 0.99) and 2.669 × 10 3 , respectively (R 2 = 0.99).The average value for the binging constant is 2.496 × 10 3 ± 172.This is consistent with the aluminum binding constants for similar complexes in the literature [21].Sensing of metal ions and selectivity (interference) studies An exceptional sensor is anticipated to demonstrate superior sensing capabilities and specificity towards the analyte, particularly when compared to various common metals.To evaluate the sensing performance towards common metal ions, an extensive screening involving 12 common metal ions-Zn 2+ , Cu 2+ , Co 2+ , Cd 2+ , Pb 2+ , Al 3+ , Ni 2+ , Hg 2+ , K + , Na + , Mg 2+ , and Ca 2+ -in a methanol solution is conducted (Figure S5, Figure 6a).Remarkably, only the Al 3+ ion exhibits a distinct peak at 398 nm (above the baseline), while the other metal ions show no luminescence at that wavelength.This notable result emphasizes the sensor's exceptional ability to detect the Al 3+ ion (Figure 6b).The selectivity (interference) study is carried out through two different approaches.In the first method, complex 1 is initially mixed with various other metal ions, followed by the addition of Al 3+ ions.This procedure is carried out separately for each individual metal ions (Figure 7).In the second method, a scenario is stimulated to mimic a real-life situation in which all metal ions could co-exist in the same medium.In this case, complex 1 and Al 3+ are mixed first, and subsequently, all the other metal cations are introduced to the same mixture (Figure S8).With both methods, it is clear that the aluminum ion can be detected by the sensor in the presence of most of the s-block and d-block metal ions regardless of single or multiple metal contaminants show casing its high selectivity towards the Al 3+ ion sensing.It is noteworthy that Cu 2+ , Co 2+, and Cd 2+ have often been identified as common interferences for aluminum sensors [7,14].However, our sensor demonstrates no interference with Cu 2+ , Co 2+ and Cd 2+ (Figure S8).(See Section 2). Figure 6.(a) PL spectra of complex 1 in methanol upon the addition of Al 3+ with excitation of 364 nm and emission at 398 nm.(b) Photography of complex 1 in the presence of various metal ions under a UV lamp.
The selectivity (interference) study is carried out through two different approaches.In the first method, complex 1 is initially mixed with various other metal ions, followed by the addition of Al 3+ ions.This procedure is carried out separately for each individual metal ions (Figure 7).In the second method, a scenario is stimulated to mimic a real-life situation in which all metal ions could co-exist in the same medium.In this case, complex 1 and Al 3+ are mixed first, and subsequently, all the other metal cations are introduced to the same mixture (Figure S8).With both methods, it is clear that the aluminum ion can be detected by the sensor in the presence of most of the s-block and d-block metal ions regardless of single or multiple metal contaminants show casing its high selectivity towards the Al 3+ ion sensing.It is noteworthy that Cu 2+ , Co 2+, and Cd 2+ have often been identified as common interferences for aluminum sensors [7,14].However, our sensor demonstrates no interference with Cu 2+ , Co 2+ and Cd 2+ (Figure S8).(See Section 2.) Aluminum titration Subsequently, an aluminum ion titration is conducted to establish a standard curve.Upon the introduction of Al 3+ into the sensor solution, a discernible alternation is observed.The peak at 613 nm, responsible for the red emission, decreases in intensity, while a new peak emerges at 398 nm.The notable transformation is harnessed for its ratiometric intensity change, I498/I613, which exhibits a pronounced sensitivity to variations in aluminum concentration, primarily attributed to the hypersensitivity of the J = 2 transition at 613 nm the environment change [14].Furthermore, the signal-to-noise ratio at 398 nm (I/I0) demonstrates a remarkable 21-fold increase in signal intensity at saturation, while maintain the linearity within the range of 0-47.6 ppb as evidenced by an R square value of 0.99 (Figure 8; Figure S6).The limit of detection (LOD) value is 4.79 ppb (1.77 × 10 −7 M) calculated as three times the signal-to-noise (I/Io) ratio.Quantum yield is determined using the quinine sulfate standard by indirect method, the absorbance and emission of QS and Al 3+ complex are recorded and compared, plugging the values into a standard quantum yield calculator, the aluminum complex is found to exhibit a quantum yield of 0.14, The value Aluminum titration Subsequently, an aluminum ion titration is conducted to establish a standard curve.Upon the introduction of Al 3+ into the sensor solution, a discernible alternation is observed.The peak at 613 nm, responsible for the red emission, decreases in intensity, while a new peak emerges at 398 nm.The notable transformation is harnessed for its ratiometric intensity change, I 498 /I 613, which exhibits a pronounced sensitivity to variations in aluminum concentration, primarily attributed to the hypersensitivity of the J = 2 transition at 613 nm the environment change [14].Furthermore, the signal-to-noise ratio at 398 nm (I/I 0 ) demonstrates a remarkable 21-fold increase in signal intensity at saturation, while maintain the linearity within the range of 0-47.6 ppb as evidenced by an R square value of 0.99 (Figures 8 and S6).The limit of detection (LOD) value is 4.79 ppb (1.77 × 10 −7 M) calculated as three times the signal-to-noise (I/I o ) ratio.Quantum yield is determined using the quinine sulfate standard by indirect method, the absorbance and emission of QS and Al 3+ complex are recorded and compared, plugging the values into a standard quantum yield calculator, the aluminum complex is found to exhibit a quantum yield of 0.14, The value is found to be closely related to a known aluminum six coordinated complexes reported in the literature [53].Refer to Figure S7 for quantum yield data.
is found to be closely related to a known aluminum six coordinated complexes reported in the literature [53].Refer to Figure S7 for quantum yield data. Quantitative detection of Al 3+ in aluminum-containing water samples as a real-world application.
After thorough investigation of complex 1 for quantitative detection of aluminum ion sensitivity in methanol, endeavors are made to adapt complex 1 for measurements in water samples.A new calibration curve was established for aluminum ions in water (see Quantitative detection of Al 3+ in aluminum-containing water samples as a real-world application. After thorough investigation of complex 1 for quantitative detection of aluminum ion sensitivity in methanol, endeavors are made to adapt complex 1 for measurements in water samples.A new calibration curve was established for aluminum ions in water (see Section 2).It is essential to underscore that during the calibration procedure, we intentionally introduce 10 µL of water into 2 mL of methanol to ensure the properties of the methanol remain unaffected by the addition of a small quantity of water.This also accentuates the minimal sample requirement of our sensor for accurate readings.This newly created calibration curve exhibits a linear range of 4.975-24.876ppb, characterized by a 0.99 R-square value (Figures 9 and S9a,b).The LOD value determined from the graph is 8.11 ppb, set at 3 times the I/I o value.It is noteworthy to report that this LOD value is much smaller than the WHO-recommended level for aluminum for drinking water.As aluminum serves no discernible function within the human body and its accumulation can result in adverse consequences, our sensor assumes a pivotal role in the detection of even trace amount of aluminum contamination in water.This will help to preservation of water purity and ensure its suitability for consumption.We believe that our sensor holds substantial potential in detecting even trace amount of aluminum ion contaminations, with versatile applications spanning such as monitoring industrial waste water discharge, monitoring water quality in rivers, lakes and oceans, and monitoring public drinking water reservoirs.
Section 2).It is essential to underscore that during the calibration procedure, we intentionally introduce 10 µL of water into 2 mL of methanol to ensure the properties of the methanol remain unaffected by the addition of a small quantity of water.This also accentuates the minimal sample requirement of our sensor for accurate readings.This newly created calibration curve exhibits a linear range of 4.975-24.876ppb, characterized by a 0.99 Rsquare value (Figure 9; Figure S9a,b).The LOD value determined from the graph is 8.11 ppb, set at 3 times the I/Io value.It is noteworthy to report that this LOD value is much smaller than the WHO-recommended level for aluminum for drinking water.As aluminum serves no discernible function within the human body and its accumulation can result in adverse consequences, our sensor assumes a pivotal role in the detection of even trace amount of aluminum contamination in water.This will help to preservation of water purity and ensure its suitability for consumption.We believe that our sensor holds substantial potential in detecting even trace amount of aluminum ion contaminations, with versatile applications spanning such as monitoring industrial waste water discharge, monitoring water quality in rivers, lakes and oceans, and monitoring public drinking water reservoirs.It is worth reporting that the LOD value is smaller, and the range is larger for the aluminum standard curve in methanol than it is in water.The solubility difference of aluminum in methanol and water may be the reason for the difference in LOD and range.
The following equation is derived, where R is the I/I0 value and Al is the aluminum concentration in ppb: R = 0.39 [Al] − 0.2 To validate the reading of complex 1 for Al 3+ ions in water, two unknown samples were tested with both the ICP-OES instrument (Figure S10) and complex 1 (Figure S11).Results are summarized in Table 1.The results clearly show the accuracy and repeatability of the readings.
Table 1.A blind study was performed with two unknown samples to validate complex 1′s sensing for Al 3+ ions.It is worth reporting that the LOD value is smaller, and the range is larger for the aluminum standard curve in methanol than it is in water.The solubility difference of aluminum in methanol and water may be the reason for the difference in LOD and range.
The following equation is derived, where R is the I/I 0 value and Al is the aluminum concentration in ppb: R = 0.39 [Al] − 0.2 To validate the reading of complex 1 for Al 3+ ions in water, two unknown samples were tested with both the ICP-OES instrument (Figure S10) and complex 1 (Figure S11).Results are summarized in Table 1.The results clearly show the accuracy and repeatability of the readings.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Crystal structure of complex 1.The colours in the structure represent the following atoms: red = oxygen; blue = nitrogen; yellow = sulfur; green = fluorine; grey = carbon; white = hydrogen.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Crystal structure of complex 1.The colours in the structure represent the fo oms: red = oxygen; blue = nitrogen; yellow = sulfur; green -fluorine; grey = carbon; w gen.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. PL spectra of complex 1 in methanol before and after the addition of Al 3+ i 1: excitation at 338 nm; emission at 613 nm.Complex 1 + Al 3+ : excitation at 364 nm; e nm.)The inset picture shows the complex with and without aluminum addition u irradiation.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. PL spectra of complex 1 in methanol before and after the addition of Al 3+ ions.(Complex 1: excitation at 338 nm; emission at 613 nm.Complex 1 + Al 3+ : excitation at 364 nm; emission at 398 nm).The inset picture shows the complex with and without aluminum addition under UV lamp irradiation.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. (a).Luminescence titration data plot to deduce the 1:1 stoichiometric ratio between Al 3+ and complex 1.(b) Depiction of the binding mode of the Al 3+ ions (blue circles) by displacing Eu 3+ ions (red circles) in complex 1.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. PL response of complex 1 at 398 nm, in the presence and absence of aluminum cation at different pH levels in methanol.(Complex 1: excitation at 338 nm; emission at 613 nm.Complex 1 + Al 3+ : excitation at 364 nm; emission at 398 nm.)

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. (a).Luminescence titration data plot to deduce the 1:1 stoichiometric ratio between Al 3+ and complex 1.(b) Depiction of the binding mode of the Al 3+ ions (blue circles) by displacing Eu 3+ ions (red circles) in complex 1.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. (a).Luminescence titration data plot to deduce the 1:1 stoichiometric ratio between Al 3+ and complex 1.(b) Depiction of the binding mode of the Al 3+ ions (blue circles) by displacing Eu 3+ ions (red circles) in complex 1.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. PL response of complex 1 at 398 nm, in the presence and absence of aluminum cation at different pH levels in methanol.(Complex 1: excitation at 338 nm; emission at 613 nm.Complex 1 + Al 3+ : excitation at 364 nm; emission at 398 nm.)

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. PL response of complex 1 at 398 nm, in the presence and absence of aluminum cation at different pH levels in methanol.(Complex 1: excitation at 338 nm; emission at 613 nm.Complex 1 + Al 3+ : excitation at 364 nm; emission 398 nm).

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(a) PL spectra of complex 1 in methanol upon the addition of Al 3+ with excitation of 364 nm and emission at 398 nm.(b) Photography of complex 1 in the presence of various metal ions under a UV lamp.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. PL responses of complex 1 at 398 nm in the absence and presence of different metal ions in methanol.The first bar (left-most) shows the emission of complex 1 alone; other brown bars represent PL intensities after complex 1 was treated with various metal cations individually, whereas the green bars represent PL intensities after complex 1 was treated with both other metal ions and Al 3+ simultaneously.A volume of 50 µL of 0.1 M of metal ions was used for all tested metals.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. PL responses of complex 1 at 398 nm in the absence and presence of different metal ions in methanol.The first bar (left-most) shows the emission of complex 1 alone; other brown bars represent PL intensities after complex 1 was treated with various metal cations individually, whereas the green bars represent PL intensities after complex 1 was treated with both other metal ions and Al 3+ simultaneously.A volume of 50 µL of 0.1 M of metal ions was used for all tested metals.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.(a) PL spectra of complex 1 in methanol upon the addition of Al 3+ with excitation of 364 nm.The inset presents the standard curve for Al 3+ addition for I398/I613.(b) Standard curve for Al 3+ addition for I/I0 at 398 nm emission.(c) Linear range for Al 3+ sensing for complex 1 with an R 2 value = 0.99.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.(a) PL spectra of complex 1 in methanol upon the addition of Al 3+ with excitation of 364 nm.The inset presents the standard curve for Al 3+ addition for I 398 /I 613 .(b) Standard curve for Al 3+ addition for I/I 0 at 398 nm emission.(c) Linear range for Al 3+ sensing for complex 1 with an R 2 value = 0.99.

Table 1 .
A blind study was performed with two unknown samples to validate complex 1's sensing for Al 3+ ions.