Correction: Chakin et al. Tritium Desorption Behavior and Microstructure Evolution of Beryllium Irradiated at Low Temperature Up to High Neutron Dose in BR2 Reactor. J. Nucl. Eng. 2023, 4 , 552–564

The authors would like to make the following corrections to the published paper [...]

Figures 3 and 4 with the legends were removed according to the remarks of a Reviewer.The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected because the total tritium release is a separate treatment of the obtained data, which were included in the article, to compare the tritium release results at different heating rates.Since this comparison does not lend itself to logical interpretation, it was decided to remove it.Additional research work will be carried out and results published to determine the absolute values of the total tritium release from irradiated beryllium.After this removal, the figure numbers were changed as follows: Figure 5 to Figure 3, Figure 6 to Figure 4, Figure 7 to Figure 5, Figure 8 to Figure 6.
Figure 9 was removed.Figures 7 and 8 with the new legends were added, as below.Figure 8 is the former Figure 9 with the experimental data after a specified linear approximation of the effective tritium diffusion coefficients in Figure 7.  Figures 3 and 4 with the legends were removed according to the rema viewer.The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected becau tritium release is a separate treatment of the obtained data, which were inc article, to compare the tritium release results at different heating rates.Since t ison does not lend itself to logical interpretation, it was decided to remove it research work will be carried out and results published to determine the abs of the total tritium release from irradiated beryllium.After this removal, the bers were changed as follows: Figure 5 to Figure 3, Figure 6 to Figure 4, Figur 5, Figure 8 to Figure 6.
Figure 9 was removed.Figures 7 and 8 with the new legends were adde Figure 8 is the former Figure 9 with the experimental data after a specified lin imation of the effective tritium diffusion coefficients in Figure 7.The content of Table 8 of the tritium diffusion path L in the irradiated Be s changed because of the changed linear correlation in the added Figure 7.The Table 8 appears below.The Correlations (5) and ( 6) were specified as follows: for β1 the coefficient changed by 2.02 and for β2 1.9006 was changed by 1.92 because the specified c of the pre-exponential factor of desorption ν.The corrected Correlations (5) and below: For Correlation (7), the coefficient 3.5597 was changed to 4.  The content of Table 8 of the tritium diffusion path L in the irradiated Be sample was changed because of the changed linear correlation in the added Figure 7.The corrected Table 8 appears below.The Correlations ( 5) and ( 6) were specified as follows: for β 1 the coefficient 2.2447 was changed by 2.02 and for β 2 1.9006 was changed by 1.92 because the specified calculations of the pre-exponential factor of desorption ν.The corrected Correlations ( 5) and ( 6) appear below: For Correlation (7), the coefficient 3.5597 was changed to 4.2412, degree −6 was replaced by −10, and the exponent −1.05 was replaced by −0.47 because the specified linear approximation of the effective tritium diffusion coefficients in Figure 7.The corrected Correlation (7) appears below:

Text Correction
The following was added in Section 2 to clarify the tritium content in irradiated beryllium at the time of the thermal desorption tests: "Due to the radioactive decay of tritium from 1995 to 2022, the content of tritium in beryllium to the time of the thermal desorption tests decreased to 440 appm." The following was added in Section 2 to correct the duration of each temperature step in the stepped heating mode: "1-h exposure at each temperature" The following were removed from Section 3.1.because Figures 3 and 4 were removed: "Figure 3 shows the total tritium release results for the irradiated beryllium matrix fragments at three heating modes." "The total tritium release behavior for the different heating modes is illustrated in Figure 4.The results indicate that the largest total tritium release occurred under the higher permanent heating rate while the stepped heating mode showed the lowest total tritium release value." The following was added in Section 4.2.because Figure 7 was added: "Figure 7 shows a linear approximation of the effective tritium diffusion coefficients D from Table 7 in the axes lg D to 1000/T." The following was corrected in the paragraph above Table 8 in Section 4.2.Please note that the changes have been marked in bold.
"The calculated L values are shown in Table 8.By comparing the calculated values of the tritium diffusion path L with radius R of the diameter d (see Table 1), it is possible to estimate the possibility for tritium total escaping the sample during the exposure time t at a given temperature T. Table 8 shows the results of these calculations.As follows from Table 8, the tritium atoms reach the outer surface of the samples after exposure at 1273 and 1373 K for 100 h as well as at 1473 K for 70 h.According to Table 2, the tritium release peaks are located in an interval of 1031-1136 K. Therefore, it is logical to use for detritiation of the irradiated beryllium waste the annealing temperatures that are higher than the tritium peak temperatures.Therefore, if there are fragments of irradiated beryllium with size of ~3 mm, a minimum annealing temperature for the tritium escaping can be 1273 K and an exposure time is 100 h.If sizes of irradiated beryllium fragments are larger than 3 mm, then, accordingly, the new annealing parameters can be selected using the relation (8)." The following was removed in Section 4.3.because Figure 4 was removed: "Figure 4 shows a significant difference between values of the total tritium release for different heating modes as the permanent heating at 0.117 and 0.017 K/s rates and the stepped heating.A similar situation occurred in an earlier study [18] in which the same setup for the TDS tests was used.At present, no clear explanation of this imbalance for the total tritium release at different heating modes during TPD testing of irradiated beryllium has been found.Possible reasons for this imbalance may be loss of tritium during movement in the pipe line from the furnace to the IC by temporary tritium adsorption on the inner walls of the pipes, the mode of operation of the IC or other factors."

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Dependence of lg D on 1000/T, where D, m 2 /s is the effective tritium diffusio T, K is the temperature (D and T were taken from Table7).

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Dependence of lg D on 1000/T, where D, m 2 /s is the effective tritium diffusion coefficient, T, K is the temperature (D and T were taken from Table7).

Table 8 .
Tritium diffusion path L in irradiated Be sample calculated using relation (8).

Table 8 .
Tritium diffusion path L in irradiated Be sample calculated using relation (8).