Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) as a Model System for Longitudinal Experimental Opioid Treatments: Implications for Orthopedic and Biomedical Research

Due to the high prevalence of opioid prescription following orthopedic procedures, there is a growing need to establish an animal model system to evaluate the effects of opioids on bone remodeling. Rabbits have been employed as model organisms in orthopedic research as they exhibit well-defined cortical bone remodeling similar to humans. Existing research in rabbits has been limited to modes of opioid administration that are short-acting and require repeated application. Here, we present data from a proof-of-principle longitudinal study employing two opioid analgesic administration routes (subcutaneous injection and transdermal patch) to evaluate the efficacy of studying chronic opioid exposure in a rabbit model. Skeletally mature male New Zealand White rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) were divided into three groups of seven animals: morphine, fentanyl, and control. Experimental treatments were conducted for eight weeks. Preparation of the skin at the fentanyl patch site and subsequent patch removal presented experimental difficulties including consistent skin erythema. Though noninvasive, the patches further caused acute stress in fentanyl animals. We conclude that though transdermal fentanyl patches may be preferred in an acute clinical setting, this method is not feasible as a means of long-term pain relief or opioid delivery in a


Introduction
Each year, over 70% of the 500,000 drug-related deaths worldwide are categorized as opioid-related [1]. In the United States, drug overdoses remain the leading cause of death for Americans under age 50 [2] with 21.7 deaths recorded per 100,000 people in 2017 [3]. In 2019, a record-high spike of opioid overdose deaths in the United States was recorded at nearly 50,000, with 73 percent involving synthetic opioids [4].
The prevalence of opioid use is due, in part, to developed dependence following legal prescription. Orthopedic surgeons are the third highest prescribers of opioids in the United States [5]. Orthopedic surgeons further account for an estimated 8.8% of acquired chronic opioid dependence following surgery [5]. In this sector of healthcare, morphine is a common treatment for post-operative pain following total joint arthroplasty [6]. In addition to morphine, transdermal fentanyl application has been shown to provide substantial levels

Materials and Methods
A detailed animal protocol  was approved by The University of Akron Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). All research team members completed in-person training with The University of Akron Research Vivarium (UARV) attending veterinarian in proper ethical care, handling, euthanasia, and use of laboratory animals.

Animals
Skeletally mature, healthy, 6-month-old (2.3-3.0 kg), male NZW rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus; n = 21) were acquired from Covance Research Products Inc. (Denver, PA, USA). Rabbits were individually housed in stainless steel rabbit batteries with perforated plastic floor inserts that allowed for limited visual interaction between animals, while keeping the animals lodged separately. Rabbits were fed Harlan Teklad Global High Fiber Rabbit Diet (Envigo, Madison, WI, USA) (150 g/day) and water was provided ad libitum by way of hard plastic water bottles. Enrichment foods (e.g., spinach, dried fruits, papaya tablets) were provided daily, and enrichment devices (e.g., rattles, jingle balls, flexi-keys) were provided in rabbit batteries and exercise pens and changed weekly. Rabbits were placed in floor-based exercise pens three times weekly for a 45 min period to allow for normal postural changes (e.g., hindlimb stretching, running). The housing room was maintained at 61 • F to 70 • F (16 • C to 21 • C), at 30% to 70% humidity, and on a 12:12/h light:dark cycle. The rabbits were quarantined and habituated to the testing conditions for a two-week period prior to experimental treatments.

Experimental Design
Using a random number generator, the rabbits were divided into three groups of seven animals each: morphine, fentanyl, and controls. The control group was further randomly divided into saline vehicle (n = 3) and transdermal sham patch groups (n = 4). These group sizes were based on the mean numbers employed in previous characterizations of this model for cancellous bone or cortical geometry/density [37][38][39][40][41]. After the acclimation period, experimental treatments were applied to control and opioid groups (morphine and fentanyl) for eight weeks. The proposed opioid dosing levels are consistent with clinical recommendations for analgesia in rabbits and were finalized with the UARV veterinarian. Drug dose was calculated based on individual rabbit weight (kg), measured at the start of each week. The morphine sulfate group received a dose of 3 mg/kg/day via subcutaneous bolus injection. The saline vehicle control group was administered saline at a dose of 3 mg/kg/day also via subcutaneous injection.
Transdermal fentanyl patches acted as a slow-release delivery agent and reduced the dosing frequency from daily to every third day. The dorsum of each fentanyl-group rabbit was shaved to remove fur, and a 25 µg/h slow-release transdermal fentanyl patch (Henry Schein Inc., Melville, NY, USA) was placed on the interscapular region, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Patch size and specific dosage were selected based on data obtained by Foley et al. [42] and Jain et al. [35] The patches were affixed via adhesives associated with the patch manufacturing. Patches were further secured by applying a medical-grade Tegaderm™ (3M, Maplewood, MN, USA) transparent film dressing, used in clinical settings to cover IV insertion sites and burns. A 2% isopropyl myristate softening solution was applied to the skin of control patch animals and placebo patches (Tegaderm™ transparent film dressing) [43]. Rabbit jackets (Lomir Biomedical, Malone, NY, USA) were used to cover fentanyl and control transdermal patches (Tegaderm™) to prevent the animals from chewing, removing, or ingesting these from the interscapular region.

Data Collection
Daily observations were recorded and scored at consistent time points throughout the experiment. These records detailed normalcy, or acute changes, in fecal output, food consumption, appearance, and behavior. All animals were weighed weekly.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed in R version 3.6.1 (5 July 2019) (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing). To analyze statistical differences between drug treatment groups, fecal output (normal, slightly low, low, very low) and food consumption levels (full, moderate, low) were coded numerically. Jacket use (yes/no) was also coded numerically for use as a covariate. Analysis was restricted to the experimental drug treatment period, following acclimation.
Graphic representation of food consumption and fecal output ( Figure 1) suggested that these two variables were correlated. Pearson's correlations were used, as a Shapiro-Wilk test indicated that all drug groups were normally distributed in both mean fecal output (  Correlation between mean food consumption (solid green line) and mean fecal output (solid brown line). Data points indicate food consumption (green) and fecal output (brown) for individual animals. Study timepoints include drug treatment initiation (red vertical line) and subsequent calcein injections (green vertical lines). For morphine rabbits, mean food consumption is depressed relative to mean fecal output between the drug treatment start date and the third injection.
A one-way ANCOVA indicated that fecal output was not significantly impacted by either the main effect of drug treatment group (F(2, 17) = 0.286, p = 0.755, ηp2 = 0.033, power = 0.095) or the co-variate of jacketing (F(1, 17) = 0.451, p = 0.767, ηp2 = 0.511, power Figure 1. Correlation between mean food consumption (solid green line) and mean fecal output (solid brown line). Data points indicate food consumption (green) and fecal output (brown) for individual animals. Study timepoints include drug treatment initiation (red vertical line) and subsequent calcein injections (green vertical lines). For morphine rabbits, mean food consumption is depressed relative to mean fecal output between the drug treatment start date and the third injection.
The main effect of drug treatment group did have a significant effect on food consumption, as indicated by a one-way ANCOVA (F(2, 17) = 5.441, p = 0.0149, ηp2 = 0.390, power = 0.841). A retrospective power analysis confirmed that our drug treatment group size (n = 7) exceeds the per-group sample size (n = 6.14) needed to obtain the observed effect size (Cohen's f = 0.8) at the recommended 0.80 power. Mean food consumption followed the pattern Control > Fentanyl > Morphine. Post-hoc analyses with Tukey's HSD indicated that differences in mean food consumption reached statistical significance only for the Control > Morphine pairwise comparison (p = 0.012). Food consumption did not significantly differ between control and fentanyl groups (p = 0.501) or fentanyl and morphine groups (p = 0.118). The co-variate of jacketing had no significant effect on food consumption (F(1, 17) = 0.177, p = 0.680, ηp2 = 0.010, power = 0.07) ( Figure 2). siduals were normally distributed (W = 0.930, p = 0.211). A Levene's test confirmed homogeneity of variances (F = 0.877, p = 0.433).
The main effect of drug treatment group did have a significant effect on food consumption, as indicated by a one-way ANCOVA (F(2, 17) = 5.441, p = 0.0149, ηp2 = 0.390, power = 0.841). A retrospective power analysis confirmed that our drug treatment group size (n = 7) exceeds the per-group sample size (n = 6.14) needed to obtain the observed effect size (Cohen's f = 0.8) at the recommended 0.80 power. Mean food consumption followed the pattern Control > Fentanyl > Morphine. Post-hoc analyses with Tukey's HSD indicated that differences in mean food consumption reached statistical significance only for the Control > Morphine pairwise comparison (p = 0.012). Food consumption did not significantly differ between control and fentanyl groups (p = 0.501) or fentanyl and morphine groups (p = 0.118). The co-variate of jacketing had no significant effect on food consumption (F(1, 17) = 0.177, p = 0.680, ηp2 = 0.010, power = 0.07) (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
Non-significant differences between jacketed (dark blue) and non-jacketed (light blue) animals in both fecal output and food consumption. Study timepoints include drug treatment initiation (red vertical line) and subsequent calcein injections (green vertical lines).
ANCOVA was suitable for this analysis as a Shapiro-Wilk test indicated that residuals were normally distributed (W = 0.958, p = 0.474) and a Levene's test confirmed homogeneity of variances (F = 1.611, p = 0.227). The injection route of analgesic administration further appeared less stressful for the animals qualitatively when compared to fentanyl rabbits. Yet, the morphine sulfate injections consistently resulted in severe sedation within the first hour following dosing.

Discussion
Here, we provide a novel longitudinal perspective on opioid delivery in a rabbit animal model via transdermal fentanyl patch application for experimental research. Prior studies have reported limited concomitant effects of short-term use. Foley and colleagues [42] evaluated the efficacy of transdermal fentanyl patch administration in NZW rabbits. Animals were treated with fentanyl patches for one patch application cycle (72-h). Skin irritation was noted by the authors [42]; however, it was largely attributed to shaving the ANCOVA was suitable for this analysis as a Shapiro-Wilk test indicated that residuals were normally distributed (W = 0.958, p = 0.474) and a Levene's test confirmed homogeneity of variances (F = 1.611, p = 0.227). The injection route of analgesic administration further appeared less stressful for the animals qualitatively when compared to fentanyl rabbits. Yet, the morphine sulfate injections consistently resulted in severe sedation within the first hour following dosing.

Discussion
Here, we provide a novel longitudinal perspective on opioid delivery in a rabbit animal model via transdermal fentanyl patch application for experimental research. Prior studies have reported limited concomitant effects of short-term use. Foley and colleagues [42] evaluated the efficacy of transdermal fentanyl patch administration in NZW rabbits. Animals were treated with fentanyl patches for one patch application cycle (72-h). Skin irritation was noted by the authors [42]; however, it was largely attributed to shaving the animals' fur for patch application. More recently, Mirschberger and colleagues [36] examined the use of transdermal fentanyl patches in rabbits on three different patch locations in the context of post-operative pain management. Their group reported that the neck and outer ear surface were the best options for transdermal patch placement. Their experimental period was 120-h and the authors reported associated erythema and animals attempting patch removal. Ultimately, the authors concluded that transdermal patches are an acute and effective delivery route for pharmacologic analgesics. Additionally, Jain and colleagues [35] examined how opioid administration delays recovery and bone healing following spinal fusion surgery in a rabbit model. In this study, animals were treated with transdermal fentanyl patches for 10 weeks (four weeks pre-operatively and six weeks post-operatively). No information was reported regarding subject skin condition in relation to treatment with transdermal fentanyl patches. Although transdermal fentanyl patches have been documented as an effective pain relief agent in such clinical settings, we report novel side effects correlated with prolonged use which have implications for efficacy in the laboratory setting.

Skin Irritation Resulting from Prolonged Patch Application
Long-term transdermal fentanyl patch treatment presented several qualitative challenges for overall rabbit health and experimental facilitation by lab personnel. Specifically, rabbit chewing, and removal of transdermal patches had to be countered with patch re-application, telemetry jackets, and VetWrap™ (3M, Maplewood, MN, USA; Figure 3). Grooming restrictions and excessive chewing behaviors were imposed by the coverings. These limitations, combined with a strong adhesive associated with the fentanyl patches, resulted in notably irritated, flaky, and bruised patch application sites compared to the other groups ( Figure 4). Surrounding fur was further matted and compressed ( Figure 5).
While transdermal patches did not require daily application, this mode of drug delivery incited the need for daily patch checks and preventative measures to counter chewing behavior and skin irritation. Initially following patch application, certain rabbits began chewing the patch and dressings, and exhibited marked grooming surrounding the associated skin and fur. Fentanyl group rabbits were more commonly observed displaying such behaviors, compared to control group rabbits with only Tegaderm™ patch treatment. This difference may be due to the increased adhesive residue left behind by the fentanyl patch, or a differential behavioral response associated with opioid delivery. animals' fur for patch application. More recently, Mirschberger and colleagues [36] examined the use of transdermal fentanyl patches in rabbits on three different patch locations in the context of post-operative pain management. Their group reported that the neck and outer ear surface were the best options for transdermal patch placement. Their experimental period was 120-h and the authors reported associated erythema and animals attempting patch removal. Ultimately, the authors concluded that transdermal patches are an acute and effective delivery route for pharmacologic analgesics. Additionally, Jain and colleagues [35] examined how opioid administration delays recovery and bone healing following spinal fusion surgery in a rabbit model. In this study, animals were treated with transdermal fentanyl patches for 10 weeks (four weeks pre-operatively and six weeks post-operatively). No information was reported regarding subject skin condition in relation to treatment with transdermal fentanyl patches. Although transdermal fentanyl patches have been documented as an effective pain relief agent in such clinical settings, we report novel side effects correlated with prolonged use which have implications for efficacy in the laboratory setting.

Skin Irritation Resulting from Prolonged Patch Application
Long-term transdermal fentanyl patch treatment presented several qualitative challenges for overall rabbit health and experimental facilitation by lab personnel. Specifically, rabbit chewing, and removal of transdermal patches had to be countered with patch reapplication, telemetry jackets, and VetWrap™ (3M, Maplewood, MN, USA; Figure 3). Grooming restrictions and excessive chewing behaviors were imposed by the coverings. These limitations, combined with a strong adhesive associated with the fentanyl patches, resulted in notably irritated, flaky, and bruised patch application sites compared to the other groups ( Figure 4). Surrounding fur was further matted and compressed ( Figure 5).    While transdermal patches did not require daily application, this mode of drug de livery incited the need for daily patch checks and preventative measures to counter chew ing behavior and skin irritation. Initially following patch application, certain rabbits be gan chewing the patch and dressings, and exhibited marked grooming surrounding th associated skin and fur. Fentanyl group rabbits were more commonly observed display ing such behaviors, compared to control group rabbits with only Tegaderm™ patch trea ment. This difference may be due to the increased adhesive residue left behind by th fentanyl patch, or a differential behavioral response associated with opioid delivery.
To prevent chewing, all fentanyl and patch control rabbits were fitted with jacke coverings (Lomir Biomedical Inc.). The jackets fully covered the chest and back of the rab  While transdermal patches did not require daily application, this mode of drug delivery incited the need for daily patch checks and preventative measures to counter chewing behavior and skin irritation. Initially following patch application, certain rabbits began chewing the patch and dressings, and exhibited marked grooming surrounding the associated skin and fur. Fentanyl group rabbits were more commonly observed displaying such behaviors, compared to control group rabbits with only Tegaderm™ patch treatment. This difference may be due to the increased adhesive residue left behind by the fentanyl patch, or a differential behavioral response associated with opioid delivery.
To prevent chewing, all fentanyl and patch control rabbits were fitted with jacket coverings (Lomir Biomedical Inc.). The jackets fully covered the chest and back of the rab- To prevent chewing, all fentanyl and patch control rabbits were fitted with jacket coverings (Lomir Biomedical Inc.). The jackets fully covered the chest and back of the rabbit, and were secured with collars at the neck, shoulders, and hips. One rabbit in the fentanyl treatment group removed the jacket and ingested the opioid-containing patch from underneath the jacket. No long-term consequences were documented beyond an acute sedative effect. To prevent subsequent patch ingestion events, this rabbit was fitted with a pillow collar in addition to the jacket. Several other rabbits were able to partially unzip and remove the jackets on multiple occasions but did not attempt to remove or ingest the patch.
Jackets that rubbed against the patch application sites were observed to lift the Tega-derm™ dressings and loosen the patches' adhesive edges. When jacket removal or patch loosening was observed, the back and chest of the rabbit were wrapped with VetWrap™ to prevent patch manipulation. Rabbits commonly attempted to pull the VetWrap™ from underneath the jacket and chew it open, with fentanyl rabbits spending significant portions of their observation time continually chewing/pulling the jackets and underlying VetWrap™. These behaviors required repeated replacement of jackets that were chewed beyond repair. By the study's end, patch presence and adherence needed to be checked daily, negating the time-saving qualities of applying a slow-release patch versus daily subcutaneous injection.
Additionally, fentanyl group rabbits commonly developed contusions or abrasions after a series of patch removal events ( Figure 6). Compared to the Tegaderm™ dressing, the fentanyl patch adhered very tightly to the skin, and was difficult to remove when associated with adjacent fur or areas of new fur growth. Over the 72-h patch cycle, adhesive residue became tightly bound to the skin. These adhesive deposits could not be easily removed from bare skin and required the underlying hair follicles to grow out enough to allow for removal with clippers. Consequently, we typically adjusted patch placement immediately laterally, rostrally, or caudally to the original application site to avoid existing bruising, erythema, or adhesive buildup. Restraining an increasingly irritated rabbit was difficult and time-consuming during the process of patch removal, fur clipping, patch re-application, antibacterial ointment application to contusions, VetWrap™ application, and jacketing.
bit, and were secured with collars at the neck, shoulders, and hips. One rabbit in the tanyl treatment group removed the jacket and ingested the opioid-containing patch underneath the jacket. No long-term consequences were documented beyond an a sedative effect. To prevent subsequent patch ingestion events, this rabbit was fitted a pillow collar in addition to the jacket. Several other rabbits were able to partially u and remove the jackets on multiple occasions but did not attempt to remove or inges patch.
Jackets that rubbed against the patch application sites were observed to lift th gaderm™ dressings and loosen the patches' adhesive edges. When jacket remov patch loosening was observed, the back and chest of the rabbit were wrapped VetWrap™ to prevent patch manipulation. Rabbits commonly attempted to pul VetWrap™ from underneath the jacket and chew it open, with fentanyl rabbits spen significant portions of their observation time continually chewing/pulling the jackets underlying VetWrap™. These behaviors required repeated replacement of jackets were chewed beyond repair. By the study's end, patch presence and adherence need be checked daily, negating the time-saving qualities of applying a slow-release patch sus daily subcutaneous injection.
Additionally, fentanyl group rabbits commonly developed contusions or abras after a series of patch removal events ( Figure 6). Compared to the Tegaderm™ dres the fentanyl patch adhered very tightly to the skin, and was difficult to remove w associated with adjacent fur or areas of new fur growth. Over the 72-h patch cycle, a sive residue became tightly bound to the skin. These adhesive deposits could not be e removed from bare skin and required the underlying hair follicles to grow out enoug allow for removal with clippers. Consequently, we typically adjusted patch placem immediately laterally, rostrally, or caudally to the original application site to avoid e ing bruising, erythema, or adhesive buildup. Restraining an increasingly irritated r was difficult and time-consuming during the process of patch removal, fur clipping, p re-application, antibacterial ointment application to contusions, VetWrap™ applica and jacketing.

Opioid Effects on Fecal Output and Food Consumption
Analysis of fecal output revealed no significant influences from drug treatme jacket use. The common side-effect of constipation from chronic opioid use [45] wa

Opioid Effects on Fecal Output and Food Consumption
Analysis of fecal output revealed no significant influences from drug treatment or jacket use. The common side-effect of constipation from chronic opioid use [45] was not observed in morphine or fentanyl treatment groups, compared to controls. Food consumption was significantly impacted by the drug treatment, with morphine group rabbits consuming significantly less food on average than control or fentanyl group rabbits. Morphine group rabbits experienced a qualitative change in activity within the first hour after dosing, appearing sedated and sedentary, which was attributed to the subcutaneous delivery of the bolus. Since all rabbits were fed daily with base and enrichment foods following dosing, sedation during the initial delivery of new food may have reduced overall food consumption for morphine group rabbits. Fecal output and food consumption were strongly and significantly correlated. Control group and fentanyl group rabbits maintained this correlation throughout the study. Graphic visualization (Figure 1) indicated that morphine group rabbits dropped in mean food consumption, relative to mean fecal output, after the drug treatment start date. Mean food consumption, however, increased over this depressed period, suggesting that morphine group rabbits became acclimated to the sedative effect over the course of the study. Mean fecal output and food consumption are aligned for morphine group rabbits.
Although fentanyl group rabbits were acutely agitated by the application of jackets, collars, VetWrap™ (3M), and tightly adhered patches, these devices did not significantly affect their food consumption or fecal output in comparison to controls. Notably, jacket use also had no significant effect on fecal output or food consumption across jacketed control and fentanyl group rabbits.
Certain animals across each opioid group presented with acute anorexia, which was associated with abnormally low fecal output. No direct causes of anorexia were identified apart from one rabbit who sustained a laceration of the lower gingiva and was treated with a chlorohexidine rinse. All animals exhibiting this trend regained normal gastrointestinal motility within one week of onset.

Limitations
Longitudinal blood collection was not conducted to assess plasma opioid concentration at different timepoints throughout the dosing period. Regular blood draws would have increased stress for the animals due to the employment of rabbit restrainers and were discouraged by attending veterinarians given the stress behaviors witnessed. This exclusion presents challenges for determining the circulating level of opioid in the blood of the animal. Consequently, the experimental dose was based on literature from preexisting studies where acute opioid delivery was assessed in similar rabbit models with established success [42]. In addition, our study did not employ quantitative measures for determining food consumption or fecal output (e.g., obtaining weights of these variables).
Daily observations were performed and recorded, however, by a consistent technician team with extensive rabbit husbandry experience. These observations were further consistent with previously published scoring descriptions provided by Weaver et al. [44]. It is also important to note that animals may have obtained higher doses of opioids via subcutaneous injection due to difficulties with jacket compliance in the fentanyl group. As such, a promising area for future experimentation may involve the administration of opioids via osmotic pumps [46]. While likely not capable of spanning the longitudinal duration of this study, a revised administration route may prevent a low-maintenance alternative to slow-release transdermal patch application.

Bone Remodeling and Transdermal Fentanyl Patches
To better characterize the effects of chronic opioid use on bone remodeling, rabbits offer a promising model system as they are the smallest traditionally used laboratory animals with well-defined cortical remodeling [17]. As a result, rabbits have been used as experimental animals for studying central canal size and the vascular network of cortical bone [18,19]. Bone remodeling can be highly influenced by mechanical loading properties (including force strength, frequency, duration), resulting in increases in bone deposition [47]. While there are documented differences in mechanical loading properties following chronic opioid administration [48], it is critical to note that restrictions imposed via jackets, VetWrap TM , and pillow collar can influence bone remodeling, as evidenced by behavioral changes in canine studies [49]. Thus, researchers must remain consistent in strategic interventions to prevent patch removal across treatment and control groups. It is possible that the extrapolation of these data to the context of the greater literature may result in inconsistencies for jacketed, patch administration animals. This evidence further supports our recommendation to refrain from using transdermal patches for longitudinal opioid delivery in a rabbit model in the context of bone research.

Conclusions
Rabbits have served as model organisms to test the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics following surgery [21][22][23], new biocompatible implants and hardware [24][25][26][27][28], and to mimic bone and tendon pathological states [28][29][30][31][32]. These studies highlight the benefit of the use of rabbits in comparative research to explore novel therapeutic methods in the orthopedic field. The literature, however, fails to consider the practical use of rabbits as a model organism when administered opioid analgesics. Although the use of transdermal fentanyl patches for rabbit analgesia may be preferred in an acute clinical setting, this delivery method is not feasible for long-term pain relief or opioid delivery in a laboratory context. In the current study, all animals subjected to transdermal fentanyl patch application consistently displayed erythema and continuously attempted to remove patches, which resulted in acute animal stress and an increased time commitment for lab personnel. In contrast, the morphine sulfate injection group did not demonstrate detrimental changes in fur appearance or overall health, though these animals consumed less food throughout the study. There were no significant effects of opioid administration on fecal output, with morphine group rabbits regaining normal correlation with food and fecal output for the last fourth of the experimental period. The observed sedative side-effects of the subcutaneous delivery of a larger opioid dose could have implications for individuals hoping to assess metabolic performance or other time-sensitive metrics. With the drawbacks associated with transdermal patch opioid administration, we suggest that orthopedic researchers employ an alternative administration route when conducting longitudinal opioid studies. In future work, we plan to evaluate the prolonged impact of longitudinal fentanyl administration via subcutaneous injection on bone turnover in a rabbit model system, while controlling for indirect confounding effects of opioid exposure including caloric intake, hormonal effects, and exercise regimens.