Next Article in Journal
Alutiiq Fish Skin Traditions: Connecting Communities in the COVID-19 Era
Next Article in Special Issue
The Origin of Late Roman Period–Post-Migration Period Lithuanian Horses
Previous Article in Journal
Mural Art Conservation Data Recording (SCIMA): The Graart Project
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Human Impact on Antler Conformation in Western Red Deer (Cervus elaphus elaphus Linnaeus, 1758)

by
László Bartosiewicz
Osteoarchaeological Research Laboratory, Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Heritage 2021, 4(4), 4233-4248; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040233
Submission received: 18 October 2021 / Revised: 28 October 2021 / Accepted: 3 November 2021 / Published: 5 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zooarchaeology)

Abstract

:
A stray find of red deer antler from Sweden with the braincase was collected due to an apparently pathological deformation, the strongly retarded right antler. Measurements of the complete left antler inspired the analysis of general antler conformation in order to place this archaeological specimen in a zoological context. This stray find and another prehistoric antler from Sweden as well as three complete prehistoric antlers from Hungary were metrically compared using measurements of over 17,000 trophies of extant red deer from Hungary. The results confirmed that the stray specimen from Sweden and prehistoric antlers from Hungary were similar in that they were stouter (smaller length measurements but greater circumferences) than their 20th century counterparts. Most of their measurements fell within the ±1 standard deviation interval of the means of extant trophies. The pathological lesion on the studied stray specimen directed attention to the role of human selection. Twentieth century record trophies show a significant increase in antler weight and “quality” as defined in the international trophy grading system. While these morphometric observations cannot be taken as a proxy for absolute dating or precise contextual identification for the stray find central to this study, its size and apparent lack of consistent human selection (pathological deformation, “archaic” antler proportions) point to possibly early origins, prior to major human influence.

1. Introduction

A distinctive feature of cervids is antler, whose complex physiology, anatomy, and taphonomy differ from that of skeletal bone, even if their chemical compositions are identical. Grown by males in red deer, antler maintains a special position in archaeology as well. This paper is proceeding from the analysis of a pathological-looking stray find of red deer (Cervus elaphus Linnaeus, 1758) antler from Stockholm University (Sweden) toward a general evaluation of prehistoric antler racks against the background of human-induced changes in the conformation of antler in extant red deer in Hungary.
According to mtDNA studies [1], the western lineage of red deer is believed to derive from a glacial refugium in Iberia, free of the glacial ice that covered the rest of Europe at the time. Western red deer are widely distributed in present-day Europe. A genetic signal congruent with these mtDNA results has recently also been identified in the nuclear genome, haplogroup A being most widely distributed from Iberia throughout continental Europe, the British Isles, and Scandinavia. In central/eastern Europe it co-occurs with haplogroup C of southeastern Europe, occurring in the Balkans and the Carpathians respectively [2].
In principle, the terminus post quem date of the Stockholm find is thus the end of the Last Glacial Maximum. According to the fossil record, the species reached western, central, and north-western Europe, including Scandinavia, by about 10,000 BP, mostly represented by haplogroup A [3]. This time was the beginning of the Preboreal/Boreal chronozone that corresponds to the Mesolithic in archaeological terms [4]. Red deer became increasingly common during the Atlantic chronozone (8000–5000 BP) with the emergence of closed woodland vegetation [5]. Red deer distribution reached the Mälardalen region toward the north that includes present-day Stockholm. This game made up half or sometimes three quarters of the identifiable bones (i.e., not including antler fragments) from hunted artiodactyls at Mesolithic inland settlements in southern Sweden [6,7,8,9].
Due to hunting pressure, habitat loss, and climate change, red deer populations declined continuously in Scandinavia [10]. Body size also decreased in correlation with the Holocene thermal maximum [8] around 8000–7000 BP. Habitat loss has accelerated during the last four millennia, due to deforestation by humans [3]. By the early 17th century, the red deer distribution area in Sweden shrank to a small refugium in Scania. That genetically intact residual population of the nominal subspecies C. e. elaphus Linnaeus, 1758 is now categorized as Near Threatened in the red list of endangered species in Sweden [11]. The genetics of “pure” C. e. elaphus were not found to substantially differ from contemporary Swedish red deer of possibly heterogeneous sub-specific origins. The population established to preserve the genetic characteristics of the C. e. elaphus subspecies appeared to have lost 36 per cent of the electrophoretically measurable heterozygosity [12].
In Hungary, red deer has been a far more constant presence beginning with the Upper Pleistocene and throughout the entire Holocene [13], although 19th century imports have supposedly strengthened its western character in the Carpathian Basin [14]. In Sweden, there have also been continuous Modern Age introductions of red deer from Denmark [15].
Although red deer has often been translocated by humans, it seems that its present-day phylogeographic pattern in Europe reflects predominantly natural processes, in response to environmental changes and natural replacement between mtDNA lineages [2]. A major body of data on extant antlers has been used here to contextualize the morphometric characteristics of the stray find from Sweden. Contemporary stag antlers show signs of targeted breeding, distinct selection pressure governed largely by trophy hunting. It is this trend that makes “genuinely wild” archaeological finds, pre-dating massive human impact particularly interesting.

2. Materials and Methods

Central to this analysis is the deformed antler of a mature stag kept in the collections of the Osteoarchaeological Research Laboratory (ORL henceforth) at the Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University. Its date of acquisition and place of origin are unknown; it was probably retained in the collection only as a curious pathological case. In the absence of archaeological information funding its radiocarbon dating could not be linked to any ongoing projects. The purpose of this osteological analysis has been to describe the size and shape of this antler in order to compare it to those of prehistoric and extant red deer.
Altogether, the antler’s appearance and its degree of preservation (to be detailed later) are indicative of prehistoric origins. It consists of the left antler subject to metric analyses here, still firmly attached to the neurocranium which also holds the rudimentary right antler. The season of death of this stag must thus have been between the fall and early spring. The reason why this specimen deserves publication even in the absence of contextual information is that its right antler is represented only by a thumb-sized stub on the forehead, an unusual pathological formation.
Moreover, antlers preserved in full length are also rare among excavated remains. A complete pair of red deer antlers came to light from the seabed outside Verkö, southern Sweden. In the absence of human modification, it was considered a probable a natural deposit. That find was radiocarbon dated to the pre-Roman Iron Age (500–0 BCE) [16].
The largely intact left antler of the ORL stag possessing a total of ten points may be of help in viewing this stray find in zoological context, revealing changes in the size and shape of red deer antler through time. Although the brow tine of the ORL specimen was damaged and the small bez tine broke off, its trez tine is complete. The fourth and fifth tines–forming the somewhat flattened crown–branch out into what is called the “composite” shape in trophy nomenclature [14]. One of the points in the crown was broken (Figure 1).
Characteristics of the two complete antler finds from Sweden would have been too few for detailed statistical evaluation. Their measurements were therefore analyzed against the backdrop of trophies from late 20th century Hungary. Summarized in Table 1, the body of data selected from the set of measurements taken on trophies between 1956 and 1977 [17] included four lengths and three circumferences in addition to the weight of the antler as well as the number of points in the crown. Although the numbers of individuals vary between sets of extant measurements, they fall within a range of 15,700 to 18,250 individuals, offering a solid standard population against which antler dimensions of prehistoric stags can be reliably compared.
Relative age estimations were carried out comparing the total number of points of prehistoric antlers as well as their pedicle lengths to the growth characteristics of 1208 extant red deer antlers of various ages studied in Germany [18].
Diachronic changes in antler size in Sweden were reviewed using smaller sets of fossil and extant burr measurements in relation to the Verkö find [15,16] and comparing them to the parameters of extent red deer trophies in Hungary (Table 1).
Antler and neurocranium dimensions on osteological finds were taken following archeozoological protocols [19,20], in accordance with the 1954 guidelines of the Conseil International de la Chasse et du Conservation du Gibier (CIC) [21], an international system using specific, unified trophy parameters. In light of the great variety of methods used in pooling different measurements in fragmented archaeological assemblages [22], standard scores (z-scores) were calculated for each prehistoric antler measurement and pooled in relation to the mean values and standard deviations of corresponding antler dimensions in extant red deer (Table 1).
A cultural construct dominated by antler size, the CIC scoring system for red deer is based on the arbitrary balancing of weighed quantitative characteristics (given in cm and kg; antler weight × 2, five circumferences × 1 each, total number of points × 1, lateral beam length × 0.5, brow and trez tines × 0.25 each). In addition, a maximum of 21 scores can be added on aesthetical variables such as color, spread of the beam, and surface texture. Finally, scores are reduced by perceived faults relative to the contemporary ideal of antler conformation [23].
Linear regression analyses were used in the assessment of relative age based on antler measurements and detecting diachronic trends in contemporary CIC scores and antler weights in an effort to add emphasis to the morphological observations made in prehistoric deer. The strengths of linear correlation between the studied variables were appraised following standard criteria in statistics [24]. The statistical significance of reported results reached the p ≤ 0.05 level of probability. Quantitative similarities between antler finds and the mean values of extant red deer were studied using a cluster analysis. Ward’s method was chosen as in its steps the increase in within-group variance is minimized. In this calculation, the Euclidean distance measure is inherent to the algorithm [25].

3. Results

As shown in Table 1, the measurements available on the ORL specimen are quite similar to those of the pre-Roman Iron Age antler find from Verkö [16]. The only difference that stands out is the more robust upper beam of the ORL stag. Based on the fragment surface, the missing bez tine of this individual was smaller than in the Verkö antlers. On the other hand, the estimated distance between the eye tine and broken brow tine was somewhat greater in the ORL antler find. Antler weights are difficult to reliably compare in archaeological specimens as they are influenced by both the chance size of the attached neurocranium fragment and various degrees of mineralization.
Measurements of the ORL antler will also be compared to three pairs of complete antlers recovered at the turn of the 19th–20th century in Austria-Hungary, kept in the Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest. Two of them came to light during river regulation in the Middle Tisza river valley near the town of Csongrád. The third was found downstream, some 250 km towards the south near Zemun (present-day Serbia), located at the confluence between the Danube and Sava rivers. Similar to the fragment in the ORL collections, these antlers were still attached to the neurocranium. Based on their stratigraphic positions in alluvial deposits they have been dated to the Upper Pleistocene [26]. Their individual measurements are summarized in Table 2.
The weight of mounted prehistoric antlers in the Hungarian Natural History Museum could not be reliably appraised. However, the ORL specimen, having only one full-grown antler, weighed 3310 g. This value was doubled in attempted comparisons with modern trophy weights from Hungary.
Figure 2 offers a visual comparison between the antlers analyzed. All prehistoric pairs appear rather symmetric; therefore, the mirror image of the ORL specimen was used to virtually replace the atrophied right antler.

3.1. Relative Ages of Antler Finds

First, relationships between antler dimensions were studied to assess the relative age of the stray antler kept at ORL and prehistoric stags. In Figure 3, changes in two age-related quantitative characteristics are shown as a function of lateral beam length. Very high correlations [24] in both cases are in part caused by the use of mean values for annual age cohorts for 1208 extant red deer in this case. In calendar terms, those age groups ranged between 2 and 13 years based on dental ageing. Forty 13-year-old stags with a mean lateral beam length of only 856 mm [18] represent the data point of oldest extant red deer in these graphs in close proximity of other individuals older than ten years.
The consecutive development of antler tines is poorly fit for exact ageing as the number of points in fully grown stags is not characteristic of any particular year of life [27] although a clear, age-related trend is evident (Figure 3a). All prehistoric antlers are longer than the mean value for extant red deer; however, the total numbers of their points vary. In this regard, of all prehistoric specimens the Verkö stag falls closest to the expected number of points. The plot also indicates that in spite of being larger, the antlers of the ORL and Cs1 stags are less complex than those of their modern counterparts in the sample from Germany. A factor complicating this pattern must be selection pressure in game management for more numerous points in extant deer trophies as the total number of points in trophies increases the final score in the CIC system.
Pedicle length is one of the most reliable cranial indicators of a stag’s age [28]. In old stags it becomes much reduced as new antlers grow larger, stouter, and thus heavier each year. With the exception of individual Cs 2, the evident decline in pedicle length is also visible in all large prehistoric antlers continuing the trend in extant red deer (Figure 3b). Using solely this criterion, stag Cs 2, estimated to be 7–8 years old, looks even “younger” than the other prehistoric individuals. This measurement was not available for the Verkö antler.

3.2. Sizes and Shapes of Antler Finds

Sizes of antler finds (two from Sweden and three from Hungary) were appraised by calculating the standard (z) scores of each of their individual measurements using the means and standard deviations of extant red deer trophies from Hungary (Table 1). These contemporary parameters are not supposed to serve for direct comparisons, but rather a standard against which prehistoric measurements can be evaluated. In Figure 4, data on lengths, circumferences, and crown points were explored as three separate groups due to the fundamentally different geometrical nature and growth characteristics of longitudinal and transversal dimensions as well as numerically different discrete antler points.
Figure 4a shows each individual measurement available on all prehistoric specimens. As a gross trend, most lengths (blue units, tending left) are shorter and most circumferences (pink units, right) are larger in the five antler finds than the mean values of extant red deer: their overall shape is thicker and stouter than contemporary trophies. The biological age of prehistoric stags may play some role here which may be higher than the mean age of extant trophies from Hungary. In consecutive years antlers develop relatively shorter tines and thicker beams [29]. However, the age-related number of points in the crown corresponds to the modern average and most measurements (including those of the two finds from Sweden) fall within the ±1 standard deviation range of extant red deer. Negative outliers include one of the short bez tines each in the Cs 1 and Z specimens. The two positive outliers consist of both burr circumferences of Cs 1, which thus looks the “most prehistoric” in comparison to extant trophies.
In Figure 4b the shape of the ORL antler (also included in Figure 4a) can be appraised separately. Its measurements reflect the trend seen in Figure 4a, falling within the ±1 standard deviation interval of extant red deer in Hungary. In this case antler weight was included as well, although the surviving part of the neurocranium is probably larger and heavier that the standard section of the skull retained by contemporary taxidermists. According to the CIC grading system, when antlers are attached to a complete skull, trophy weights should be reduced by 0.7 kg before scoring when the total length of skull is less than 48 cm and by 0.8 kg if total cranial length exceeds 50 cm [23]. Still, the estimated weight of this stray specimen looks lighter than the modern average. This result may also be influenced by differences between fresh and dry subfossil bone the latter having lost all water and most organic content, but not yet fossilized. The similarity seen in Figure 4b may thus be coincidental and should not be taken at face value.
All antlers in this study (prehistoric or extant) represent the western lineage of red deer that extends far into Eastern Europe with the exception of the Carpathians, Ukraine, and Russia where only eastern haplotypes (C. elaphus maral Ogilby, 1840) were identified [1,3]. An antlered braincase with the complete left antler from a Holocene gravel deposit in the eastern Carpathians near Răchiteni (Romania) was assigned to this latter subspecies [30]. That antler indeed represents a different, more gracile morphotype: its published length measurements are longer and circumferences smaller than those of the prehistoric antlers under discussion here.
Complementing univariate statistics in Figure 4, the similarity between antlers was summarized entering the six measurements available on all of them into a cluster analysis (Figure 5). These measurements included lengths of the beam and the trez tine, circumferences of the burr and lower as well as upper beam, and the number of points in the crown.
The resulting dendrogram confirms that prehistoric individuals Cs 1 and Z stand apart (cluster 1), while Cs 2 is quite close to the mean value of extant trophies from Hungary in terms of the studied dimensions. Although pedicle length was not included in the cluster analysis, it is worth remembering that Cs 2 also stood out by its unusually “youthful” look in this regard (Figure 3b). The ORL specimen is understandably different from red deer in Hungary. However, it shows more affinity to the latter group, including the mean values of extant trophies (cluster 2). The Verkö antler is most different from the others in terms of the studied six measurements.

3.3. Antler Deformation

Although the focus of this paper is not paleopathology, in addition to metric evaluation, the anomalous ORL specimen deserves brief discussion here. In contrast to its complete left antler, it is the small stub in the place of the right antler that makes this find special (Figure 6). Barely larger than a thumb, this outgrowth is 43.2 mm long with greatest diameters of 31.1 × 23.6 mm. The retarded pedicle is 28.2 mm long. It is mushroom-shaped in its current form, with the tip being round and compact. However, part of the pedicle seems to have been heavily damaged by an interplay between pathological and taphonomic factors [31].
Importantly, no cutmarks or scavenger gnawing could be identified on the fragment. However, judged by the dark discoloration and coarse surface of the bone material, this section of the skull spent some time in an erosive environment rich in organic compounds. These may have added to the deformation and in vivo bone loss caused by a necrotic process. It seems that the right antler of the ORL stag suffered from arrested growth, possibly due to disturbed early development during the spring/early summer.

4. Discussion

The most distinctive feature of the ORL find is the pathological deformation of the right antler. Major summaries in animal paleopathology [32,33,34] do not discuss antler lesions. This may in part be explained by the short life cycle of antler: if it is not damaged by disease during its annual growth, it will show no pathological lesions. Thus, the probability of antler finds displaying any symptoms is much smaller than is the case with pathological skeletal bone possibly developing for years. In contemporary game management some antler lesions have been recorded [35,36,37,38]. However, contemporary stags growing anomalous antlers tend to be culled before the development of major deformities to prevent their procreation or on humane grounds.
When antler is shed, the open surface of the pedicle is soon covered by new skin. Antler growth below starts by the development of a fibro-cartilaginous process, pushing the newly formed skin outwards. While the cortical layer of antler is formed by desmogene ossification, the primary peg tissue inside this process is cartilage-like and is of true hyaline cartilage in its inner layers. During antler growth the interior of the peg shows endosteal apposition and perpetual bone remodeling [39]. It may have been the early stage of this delicate process that was disrupted by trauma or infection, impeding normal antler development. The atrophied pedicle would not have been strong enough to support the weight of a fully-grown antler.
Magnell noted that the left trez tine of the Verkö stag showed something that looks like minor trauma inflicted during the spring or summer. This lesion healed as the antler was still in velvet and growing at the time [16]. The anomaly is visible only on the antler surface and did not cause major deformation.
Pawłowska et al. [40] reported a healed antler fracture in giant deer (Megaloceros giganteus Blumenbach, 1799) from the proximity of Barycz, Poland dated to 40,000 BP. That right antler features a downward bend above the burr and a bony outgrowth is visible just above the brow tine in the posterior part of the bend. Detailed histological and radiographical studies have confirmed that new bone formation and callus resorption took place in the affected area.
Another example of antler fracture in red deer was reported from Croatia [41]. It is of particular interest as symptoms could be recorded on the extant individual, thus tapho-nomic changes do not interfere with the diagnosis. That antler broke between the beam and the brow tine, due to a loss of mechanical stability impaired by purulent inflammation, likely resulting from an injury to the velvet still covering the antler. The antler could develop to normal size and shape prior to fracturing, suggesting that inflammation did not begin during its early growth. In that case the trauma would have caused some sort of malformation as is likely with the ORL specimen.
Although the possibly ancient origin of the ORL specimen cannot be directly proven on a morphometric basis, circumstantial evidence is well worth considering. By the 19th century, the red deer population in Sweden sunk to between 50–100 individuals [10], in 1907 it consisted of only about 50 [11]. Recently, there has been an increase thanks to the spread of deer from Scania, infiltration from Norway [5], and the introduction of non-native stock. In 2007 there were 10,000–13,000 red deer in Sweden, by 2014 that estimate doubled. Still, in 2012/13 only 6000 red deer were hunted (27% stags), while elk and roe deer were killed almost 100,000 each [42]. It is impossible to date the ORL specimen based on these trends, but given its degree of fossilization and—to some extent—size, it is likely that it pre-dated the dramatic decline of red deer stocks.
A long-term decline in antler size may be appraised when the burr circumferences (indicative of the carrying capacity of the burr, a proxy to antler weight) of subfossil and extant (20th century) red deer in Sweden [15,16] are compared with the parameters of the same measurement in extant red deer in Hungary (Figure 7).
The Verkö antler differs from those of extant red deer in that it is larger and that the brow and trez tines are relatively thicker than in some contemporary stags in Sweden [16]. In this sense it fits the mean of the subfossil record. Figure 7a suggests a similarity in the distribution of burr circumferences between subfossil antlers from Sweden and extant trophies in Hungary. In spite of its slightly different proportions previously shown in Figure 4b, the ORL antler (as well as the Verkö find) falls near the average of both data sets. Antler size distribution of extant red deer in Sweden clearly reflects this historical size decrease, illustrating that both antler finds would be unusually large by today’s local standards (Figure 7b). In light of the completeness of the Verkö antler, Magnell could calculate the CIC score for that individual as 153 points [16]. In recognition of extant red deer being smaller in the north of Europe (c.f. Figure 7), the minimum CIC score for gold medal trophies is set to 180 for Scottish, Swedish and Norwegian red deer, while stags in Central Europe must score at least 210 [43]. The Verkö “trophy” almost reaches the bronze medal threshold of 160 for present-day Sweden (170 in Central Europe).
World record CIC scores (representing the crème de la crème of red deer trophies) showed an accelerating increase in Hungary between 1885 and 1985. During the last two decades of that period over a dozen individuals started exceeding the previously unprecedented 250 CIC score threshold [44]. During a single human generation (1960–1985) CIC scores for these medal-winning antlers [21] displayed a clearly increasing tendency, approaching the culturally determined mental template of the “ideal antler”. Although the effect of human preferences would be difficult to separate from natural factors, a priori knowledge of the trophy evaluation system suggests that a classical phenomenon known in cultural anthropology is at play: “… while details vary with each individual… all conform to a cultural ‘ideal’ or mental template and … proportions, space separating significant features, and other features can be measured to discover this mental template” [45]. The mental template embodied in the CIC scoring system has continuously shaped antlers through selective hunting.
Could similar forces have influenced the form of the ORL specimen? Building on the information on world record CIC scores used in 1999 [44], the updated 2005 list was consulted, thus 85 additional cases were included in Figure 8a [46,47].
CIC scores show a low correlation with time during the studied period, indicative of a definite but small relationship, i.e., diachronic “improvement” in terms of the mental template associated with the ideal trophy. This scoring system, however, relies heavily on quantitative characters, antler weight being weighed by 22% among the variables used in the calculation. Oscillations in Figure 8a are largely consonant with the predicted patterns in the number of antler tines and beam length of 2926 antlers shown in exhibitions during 1881–2008 [48]. Consequently, when only antler weight itself is plotted against the year of the kill a higher, moderate correlation can be detected, confirming a substantial diachronic increase in the largest record antlers during the 45 years interval studied (Figure 8b).
A more detailed analysis of data on these trophies displayed a weak decline in size between 1881 and 1958 in Hungary, followed by an increase in trophy size between 1958 and 1974 (detected in my previous analysis if CIC scores [44]), culminating in a period of stable antler tine numbers and a weak decline in beam length until 2008 [48]. This stagnation after 1990 is also visible in Figure 8. These trends illustrate the dynamic anthropogenic changes brought about by contemporary game management in Central Europe.
The initial, 1960–2005 list of world records in Figure 8 included no trophy from Sweden. In May 2016, however, a stag with the largest ever antler rack in the country was killed near Karlshamn in the south. The 13.1 kg trophy scored 244.6 on the CIC scale [49]. A “gigantic” dying stag, wounded in fight and shot in 2017 (almost 500 km north, near Kil in Värmland) scored even higher, 246.6 [50] (red dots in Figure 8), even above the gold medal minimum of 210 required in Central Europe [43]. In short: as a result of conscious game management and recently developed culling regimes for stags, since the early 2000s some individuals began reaching the size and quality of world record trophies.
These trends are a stark warning that given red deer’s phenotypic variability across regions and its dynamic oscillations through time, one should be cautious in attributing the ORL specimen to any particular epoch on the basis of its appearance. All we can state is that this individual falls well within the range of average antlers of extant red deer in Hungary, which today are larger than their brethren in Sweden. Thus, while by local 20th century standards the ORL antler may be considered large, it fits within the general size distribution of subfossil antlers in Sweden (Figure 7).
However, recently “bred” stags in Sweden have started reaching record parameters in a very short time as a result of applying strict selection criteria and “real values” of trophies in contemporary deer. These practical efforts are related to the desire of maintaining and improving some species traits in reared animals not only among livestock, but also in likewise managed game [39]. The tight, scientific organization of breeding work in the hunting-ground has yielded a dramatic turn in recent red deer evolution, reflecting the aspirations of contemporary hunters within about a human generation.

5. Conclusions

Red deer have played important roles both in both subsistence and social hunting through time and space [51]. Their antlers were an important raw material in prehistoric Europe [52,53,54]. (Thanks to annual re-growth, shed antler may be the only “secondary product” sensu Sherratt [55] offered by game: a renewable resource which requires no killing.) Antler headdresses [56] worn in various rituals carried a meaning beyond decoration [57], making antlers a recurring feature in prehistoric “shaman” burials [58]. Given this rich cognitive repertoire, it is unsurprising that there have been efforts to acquire large and beautiful antlers through the hunt and that for centuries anomalous antlers have also attracted special attention [44].
The deformed right antler of the ORL stray specimen is such a curiosity that must have played a part in its acquisition. The asymmetry resulting from this grave condition, affecting the weight distribution of the head, must have had a detrimental effect on the stag’s hierarchical position among his peers, negating his reproductive role and likely even impeded his coordinated movement. Competitive disadvantage could have resulted in the deterioration of this individual’s condition. One may argue that by the standards of contemporary game management this stag would have been culled by game wardens way before full antler growth was completed on the left side.
This stray antler find is of unknown context, lacking exact chronological age. It was hypothesized that it pre-dated major changes in antler conformation due to human impact in the form of specialized trophy hunting. Recent strategies are in sharp contrast with Middle and Late Mesolithic (ca 9000–6000 cal BP) subsistence hunting in Sweden whose rich osteological evidence shows no specific conservational or management concerns but displays site-specific, territorial variations rather than regional or chronological patterns in the age and sex distributions of the red deer felled [59].
Metric comparisons including the pre-Roman Iron Age specimen from Veksö in Sweden and three Upper Pleistocene antlers from Hungary showed that prehistoric specimens, as well as the ORL stray find, were stouter than the mean values of over 15,000 extant trophies from Hungary. The ORL antler fell near the average antler size in this comparison. While this may be considered quite large by 20th century Swedish standards, it falls around the average of subfossil stags in Sweden.
Antler weight is correlated with body size, an advantage in reproductive success among stags. Phenotypic size, however, is a complex biological phenomenon, equally influenced by inheritance, natural environment, and human manipulation both through selective hunting and landscape changes. Present day hunters collect “aesthetic” antler trophies and their strong selection pressure on extant red deer populations is shown in more-or-less steadily increasing CIC scores both in Central Europe and Sweden. Although stags use their antlers in dominance fighting during the rut, they also show them off to win access to females by display in ritualized combat. This behavior is especially important in large cervids whose “statement fights” (Kommentkampf) may be more important than clashes that cause actual damage (Beschädigungskampf), the latter being more typical in small-bodied deer species [39]. Thus, in addition to recent game management, the appearance of antlers (e.g., size and bilateral symmetry) has also been subject to natural selection, making the diachronic evaluation of antler conformation a complex task.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study did not involve human subjects.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent currently does not apply to non-human animals.

Data Availability Statement

Original data used in this study are listed in column 1 of Table 1.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the editors of this special issue for the invitation to contribute and Eve Rannamäe in particular for valuable comments on the draft manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Niedziałkowska, M.; Jędrzejewska, B.; Honnen, A.C.; Otto, T.; Sidorovich, V.E.; Perzanowski, K.; Skog, A.; Hartl, G.B.; Borowik, T.; Bunevich, A.N.; et al. Molecular biogeography of red deer Cervus elaphus from eastern Europe: Insights from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Acta Theriol. 2010, 56, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Doan, K.; Niedziałkowska, M.; Stefaniak, K.; Sykut, M.; Jędrzejewska, B.; Ratajczak-Skrzatek, U.; Piotrowska, N.; Ridush, B.; Zachos, F.E.; Popović, D.; et al. Phylogenetics and phylogeography of red deer mtDNA lineages during the last 50 000 years in Eurasia. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Niedziałkowska, M.; Doan, K.; Górny, M.; Sykut, M.; Stefaniak, K.; Piotrowska, N.; Jędrzejewska, B.; Ridush, B.; Pawełczyk, S.; Mackiewicz, P.; et al. Winter temperature and forest cover have shaped red deer distribution in Europe and the Ural Mountains since the Late Pleistocene. J. Biogeogr. 2020, 48, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ahlgren, H. Prehistoric Human Impact on Wild Mammalian Populations in Scandinavia. Ph.D. Thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liljegren, R.; Lagerås, P. Från Mammutstäpp Till Kohage. Djurens Historia I Sverige [From Mammoth Steppe to Cow Pasture. The History of Animals in Sweden]; Wallin & Dalholm: Lund, Sweden, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lepiksaar, J. Animal remains from the Atlantic bog site Ageröd V in Central Scania. In Ageröd, V: An Atlantic Bog Site in Central Scania; Larsson, L., Ed.; Institute of Archaeology, University of Lund: Lund, Sweden, 1983; pp. 159–168. ISBN 91-7260-829-3. [Google Scholar]
  7. Eriksson, M.; Magnell, O. Det djuriska Tågerup [Animal Tågerup]. In Tågerup Specialstudier; Karsten, P., Knarrström, B., Eds.; Riksantikvarieämbetet: Lund, Sweden, 2001; pp. 157–237. ISBN 9172091991. [Google Scholar]
  8. Magnell, O. Climate Change at the Holocene Thermal Maximum and Its Impact on Wild Game Populations in South Scandinavia. In Climate Change and Human Responses. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology; Monks, G., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherland, 2017; pp. 123–135. ISBN 9783319495521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gummesson, S.; Karlsson, J.; Kivikero, H.; Magnell, O.; Storå, J. Osteologisk Analys av Djurben Från Strandvägen [Osteological Analysis of Animal Bones from Strandvägen]; Arkeologi Motala; Arkeologerna: Stockholm, Sweden, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosengren, E. Sven Nilsson och Skånes Postglaciala Fauna [Sven Nilsson and Scania’s Postglacial Fauna]; Lunds Universitets Historiska Museum: Lund, Sweden, 2014; ISBN 9789163760839. [Google Scholar]
  11. Geijer, E.; Berg, H. ten En Utvärdering av Svensk Kronhjortsförvaltning [An Evaluation of Swedish Red Deer Management]; Rapport 6673; Naturvårdsverket: Stockholm, Sweden, 2015; ISBN 978-91-620-6673-4.
  12. Gyllensten, U.; Ryman, N.; Reuterwall, C.; Dratch, P. Genetic differentiation in four European subspecies of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Heredity 1983, 51, 561–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Vörös, I. Large mammal faunal changes during the Late Upper Pleistocene and Early Holocene times in the Carpathian Basin. In Pleistocene Environment in Hungary; Pécsi, M., Ed.; Geographical Research Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences: Budapest, Hungary, 1987; pp. 81–102. ISBN 963-7322-65-5. [Google Scholar]
  14. Faragó, S. Vadászati Állattan [Game Zoology]; Mezőgazda Lap—és Könyvkiadó Kft: Budapest, Hungary, 2015; ISBN 9789632867144. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ahlén, I. Studies on the Red Deer, Cervus elaphus L. In Scandinavia II. Taxonomy and Osteology of Prehistoric and Recent Populations; Viltrevy 3; Svenska Jägareförbundet: Stockholm, Sweden, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  16. Magnell, O. Hornkrona av Kronhjort Från Havsbotten Utanför Verkö, Karlskrona Skärgård [Antler of Red Deer from the Seabed Outside Verkö, Karlskrona Archipelago]; Reports in Osteology 2011: 1; Blekinge Museum & Institutionen för Arkeologi Och Antikens Historia; Lunds Universitet: Lund, Sweden, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bán, I.; Fatalin, G. A gímszarvastrófea-értékmerők és az életkor (Trophy traits and age of red deer). In Élőhely és Trófeavizsgálat Számítógéppel (Computerized Habitat and Trophy Evaluation); Bán, I., Fatalin, G., Fodor, T., Szidnai, L., Eds.; Akadémia Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1986; pp. 122–158. ISBN 9630535467. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hattemer, H.H.; Drechsler, H. Rosenstock und Geweihmerkmale von Harzhirschen und ihr Zusammenhang mit dem Alter. Z. Für Jagdwiss. 1976, 22, 36–50. [Google Scholar]
  19. Duerst, J.U. Vergleichende Untersuchungsmethoden am Skelett bei Säugern. In Handbuch der Biologischen Arbeitsmethoden; Abt. 7; Urban und Schwarzenberg: Berlin, Germany; Wien, Germany, 1926. [Google Scholar]
  20. von den Driesch, A. Das Vermessen von Tierknochen aus vor—Und Frühgeschichtliche Siedlungen; Institut für Paläoanatomie, Domestikationsforschung und Geschichte der Tiermedizin der Universität München: Munich, Germany, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  21. Szidnai, L. A gímszarvastrófea-értékmérők a nemzetközi birálati és a Nadler-képlet alapján (Red deer trophy evaluation using international grading and the Nadler formula). In Élőhely és Trófeavizsgálat Számítógéppel (Computerized Habitat and Trophy Evaluation); Bán, I., Fatalin, G., Fodor, T., Szidnai, L., Eds.; Akadémia Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1986; pp. 82–86. ISBN 9630535467. [Google Scholar]
  22. Meadow, R. The use of size index scaling techniques for research on archaeozoological collections from the Middle East. In Historia Animalium ex Ossibus. Festschrift für Angela von den Driesch; Becker, C., Manhart, H., Peters, J., Schlibler, J., Eds.; Verlag Marie Leidorf: Rahden, Germany, 1999; pp. 285–300. ISBN 3896463888. [Google Scholar]
  23. Szidnai, L. A szarvasagancs bírálata [Red deer antler grading]. Nimród 1978, 10, 394–395. [Google Scholar]
  24. Williams, F. Reasoning with Statistics; Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York, NY, USA, 1979; ISBN 0-03-019536-5. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hammer, Ø. PAleontological STatistics Version 4.02 (PAST). Reference Manual; Natural History Museum, University of Oslo: Oslo, Norway, 1999–2020. [Google Scholar]
  26. Vörös, I. Complete Pleistocene Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L.) antlers in the Carpathian Basin. Fragm. Mineral. Palaeontol. 1987, 13, 123–128. [Google Scholar]
  27. Habermehl, K.-H. Altersbestimmung bei Wild—und Pelztieren. Möglichkeiten und Methoden. In Ein praktischer Leitfaden für Jäger, Biologen und Tierärzte; Verlag Paul Parey: Hamburg/Berlin, Germany, 1985; ISBN 3-490-06812-2. [Google Scholar]
  28. Heintz, E. Les cervides villafranchiens de France et d’Espagne. Mémoires Muséum Natl. d’Histoire Nat. 1970, 22, 1–303. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sinding-Larsen, T.; Larsson, P. Kronvilt; Bokförlaget Signum i Lund AB: Lund, Sweden, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  30. Croitor, R.; Cojocaru, I. An Antlered Skull of a Subfossil Red Deer, Cervus elaphus L., 1758 (Mammalia: Cervidae), from Eastern Romania. Acta Zool. Bulg. 2016, 68, 407–414. Available online: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01767018 (accessed on 13 May 2021).
  31. Bartosiewicz, L. Taphonomy and palaeopathology in archaeozoology. Geobios 2008, 41, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tasnádi Kubacska. Az Ősállatok Pathologiája [The Pathology of Prehistoric Animals]; Medicina Könyvkiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  33. Baker, J.R.; Brothwell, D. Animal Diseases in Archaeology; Academic Press: London, UK, 1980; ISBN 0120741504. [Google Scholar]
  34. Bartosiewicz, L. Shuffling Nags, Lame Ducks: The Archaeology of Animal Disease; Oxbow: Oxford, UK, 2013; ISBN 9781782971894. [Google Scholar]
  35. Brandt, K. Das Gehörn und die Entstehung Monströser Formen; Paul Parey: Berlin, Germany, 1901. [Google Scholar]
  36. von Raesfeld, F. Das Rehwild, Naturgeschichte, Hege und Jagd; Verlag Paul Parey: Hamburg, Germany, 1956; ISBN 3490149122. [Google Scholar]
  37. Goss, R.J. Deer Antlers: Regeneration, Function, and Evolution; Academic Press Inc: New York, NY, USA, 1983; ISBN 9780323140430. [Google Scholar]
  38. Schulte, W. Hirschjagd: Aussergewöhnliche und Abnorme Heimische Rothirsche; Numann-Neudamm: Melsungen, Germany, 2011; ISBN 3788813482. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bubenik, A.B. Das Geweih. Entwicklung, Aufbau und Ausformung der Geweihe und Gehörne und ihre Bedeutung für das Wild und für die Jagd; Verlag Paul Parey: Hamburg, Germany, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  40. Pawłowska, K.; Stefaniak, K.; Nowakowski, D. Healed antler fracture from a giant deer (Megaloceros giganteus) from the Pleistocene in Poland. Palaeontol. Electron. 2014, 17, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kierdorf, U.; Kierdorf, H.; Konjević, D. Pathological fracture of a red deer antler secondary to purulent inflammation—A case report. Vet. Arh. 2013, 83, 347–356. [Google Scholar]
  42. Svenska Jägareförbundet, Avskjutningsstatistik. 2015. Available online: http://jagareforbundet.se/vilt/viltovervakning/senaste-avskjutningsstatistiken (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  43. CIC UKTEB. International Council for Game & Wildlife Conservation United Kingdom Trophy Evaluation Board. Red Deer. 2021. Available online: https://cicukteb.com (accessed on 6 May 2021).
  44. Bartosiewicz, L. The emergence of Holocene faunas in the Carpathian Basin: A review. In The Holocene History of the European Vertebrate Fauna; Benecke, N., Ed.; Verlag Marie Leidorf Gmbh: Rahden/Westf, Germany, 1999; pp. 73–90. ISBN 3896462555. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kroeber, A.L.; Richardson, J. Three centuries of women’s dress fashions: A quantitative analysis. Anthropol. Rec. 1940, 5, 111–153. [Google Scholar]
  46. OTB. Gímszarvas Világranglista [Red Deer World Ranking List]; Országos Trófeabíráló Bizottság: Budapest, Hungary, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  47. OTB. Gímszarvas Magyar Ranglista [Red Deer Hungarian Ranking List]; Országos Trófeabíráló Bizottság: Budapest, Hungary, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rivrud, I.M.; Sonkoly, K.; Lehoczki, R.; Csányi, S.; Storvik, G.O.; Mysterud, A. Hunter selection and long-term trend (1881–2008) of red deer trophy sizes in Hungary. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50, 168–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Henricson, J. Nytt Svenskt Rekord för Kronhjort. Svenskt Jakt. 2 May 2016. Available online: https://svenskjakt.se/start/nyhet/nytt-svenskt-rekord-for-kronhjort (accessed on 9 July 2021).
  50. Kjellsson, M. Gigantisk Kronhjort Skjuten i Värmland. Svenskt Jakt. 13 July 2018. Available online: https://svenskjakt.se/start/nyhet/gigantisk-kronhjort-skjuten-i-varmland (accessed on 15 March 2021).
  51. Baker, K.; Carden, R.; Madgwick, R. (Eds.) Deer and People; Oxbow: Oxford, UK, 2014; ISBN 9781909686540. [Google Scholar]
  52. Billamboz, A. L’industrie du bois de cerf en Franche-Comté au Néolithique et au début de l’Age du Bronze. Gall. Préhistoire 1977, 20, 91–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schibler, J. Technologie—Geweih/Technologie—Bois de cervidé. In Die Schweiz vom Paläolithikum bis Zum Frühen Mittelalter; SPM II: Neolithikum; Flüeler-Grauwiler, M., Ed.; Verlag Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Ur—und Frühgeschichte: Basel, Switzerland, 1995; pp. 142–147. ISBN 390800652X. [Google Scholar]
  54. Choyke, A.M. Bronze Age red deer: Case studies from the Great Hungarian Plain. In Man and the Animal World: Studies in Archaeozoology, Archaeology, Anthropology and Palaeolinguistics in Memoriam Sándor Bökönyi; Anreiter, P., Bartosiewicz, L., Jerem, E., Meid, W., Eds.; Archaeolingua Foundation: Budapest, Hungary, 1998; pp. 157–178. ISBN 9638046155. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sherratt, A. Plough and pastoralism: Aspects of the secondary product revolution. In Pattern of the Past: Studies in Honour of David Clarke; Hodder, I., Isaac, G., Hammond, N., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1981; pp. 261–305. ISBN 0521108438. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bartosiewicz, L.; Choyke, A.M.; Reynolds, F. Stag do: Ritual implications of antler use in prehistory. In The Neolithic of Europe. Papers in Honour of Alasdair Whittle; Bickle, P., Cummings, V., Hofmann, D., Pollard, J., Eds.; Oxbow: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 107–119. ISBN 978-1-78570-654-7. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bar-Yosef Mayer, D.; Bonsall, C.; Choyke, A.M. (Eds.) Not Just for Show: The Archaeology of Beads, Beadwork, and Personal Ornaments; Oxbow: Oxford, UK, 2017; ISBN 978-1-78570-692-9. [Google Scholar]
  58. Mykhailova, N. ‘Shaman’ burials in prehistoric Europe. Gendered images? In Gender Transformations in Prehistoric and Archaic Societies; Koch, J.K., Kirleis, W., Eds.; Sidestone Press: Leiden, Holland, 2019; pp. 341–362. ISBN 9789088908224. [Google Scholar]
  59. Magnell, O.; Gummesson, S.; Molin, F.; Zetterlund, P.; Storå, J. Mesolithic deer hunting–Prey choice of red deer (Cervus elaphus) based on age and sex distributions. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2020, 29, 102049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The antlered skull fragment at the ORL, Stockholm University. Frontal aspect. Scale: 300 mm.
Figure 1. The antlered skull fragment at the ORL, Stockholm University. Frontal aspect. Scale: 300 mm.
Heritage 04 00233 g001
Figure 2. Montage showing the visual reconstruction of the ORL antler (mirror image framed) in comparison to other prehistoric antlers included in the analysis. Scale: 500 mm.
Figure 2. Montage showing the visual reconstruction of the ORL antler (mirror image framed) in comparison to other prehistoric antlers included in the analysis. Scale: 500 mm.
Heritage 04 00233 g002
Figure 3. Relationships between lateral beam length and the total number of antler points (a) and pedicle length (b) respectively, illustrationg the relative age of prehistoric antlers in comparison with growth characteristics of 1208 extant red deer antlers in Germany.
Figure 3. Relationships between lateral beam length and the total number of antler points (a) and pedicle length (b) respectively, illustrationg the relative age of prehistoric antlers in comparison with growth characteristics of 1208 extant red deer antlers in Germany.
Heritage 04 00233 g003
Figure 4. Comparisons between groups of individual variables of all archaeological antler finds (a) against the background of mean values and standard deviations of extant red deer trophies in Hungary and measurements of the ORL specimen (b).
Figure 4. Comparisons between groups of individual variables of all archaeological antler finds (a) against the background of mean values and standard deviations of extant red deer trophies in Hungary and measurements of the ORL specimen (b).
Heritage 04 00233 g004
Figure 5. Clustering antlers on the basis of six measurements using Ward’s method. Calculation based on the mean values of paired measurements.
Figure 5. Clustering antlers on the basis of six measurements using Ward’s method. Calculation based on the mean values of paired measurements.
Heritage 04 00233 g005
Figure 6. Detail of the skull cap of the ORL stag showing the right antler’s stub. Frontal aspect. Scale: 50 mm.
Figure 6. Detail of the skull cap of the ORL stag showing the right antler’s stub. Frontal aspect. Scale: 50 mm.
Heritage 04 00233 g006
Figure 7. Burr circumferences of subfossil (a) and extant (b) antlers from Sweden in light of parameters of the same measurement taken on extant trophies in Hungary and the position of the ORL and Verkö specimens.
Figure 7. Burr circumferences of subfossil (a) and extant (b) antlers from Sweden in light of parameters of the same measurement taken on extant trophies in Hungary and the position of the ORL and Verkö specimens.
Heritage 04 00233 g007
Figure 8. (a) Record CIC scores of extant red deer trophies in 45 years; (b) antler weights of record red deer trophies in the same time interval. Note the 2016–2017 cases from Sweden in the right end of the diagram.
Figure 8. (a) Record CIC scores of extant red deer trophies in 45 years; (b) antler weights of record red deer trophies in the same time interval. Note the 2016–2017 cases from Sweden in the right end of the diagram.
Heritage 04 00233 g008
Table 1. Statistical parameters (sd: standard deviation) of extant red deer trophies (mm) in comparison with measurements taken on the ORL specimen and mean measurements of the antler from Verkö.
Table 1. Statistical parameters (sd: standard deviation) of extant red deer trophies (mm) in comparison with measurements taken on the ORL specimen and mean measurements of the antler from Verkö.
NMeanSdORLVerkö
lateral beam length18,2731020250932.0940.0
brow tine length18,26334763-320.5
bez tine length15,767325162--
trez tine length18,079352131263.0262.0
burr circumference18,27224427234.0239.0
lower beam circumference18,25914818158.0147.5
upper beam circumference17,99913519150.0118.5
number of points in crown17,8114.717.146
antler weight, kg18,2437.42.42 × 3.3103.940
Table 2. Antler and neurocranium dimensions (mm) of the ORL specimen and selected measurements of prehistoric red deer from Hungary.
Table 2. Antler and neurocranium dimensions (mm) of the ORL specimen and selected measurements of prehistoric red deer from Hungary.
VariablesORLCsongrád 1Csongrád 1Zemun
abbreviationORLCs 1Cs 2Z
inv. no. (Hung. Nat. Hist. Mus.)-V. 86.4V. 86.5V. 86.6
year of acquisition?189318991903
estimated age, years 4–57–8 8–10
sidesin.sin.dex.sin.dex.sin.dex.
lateral beam length930108011109901020-1120
pedicle length33303045452525
brow tine length-3534----
bez tine length--5-386-
trez tine length2626274240-31
pedicle circumference150166163160162160160
burr circumference230275274260255250250
lower beam circumference158156158151155 158158
upper beam circumference150146145136137140150
number of points in crown4354455
antler weight, kg6.6---
parietal length, A-Br96989584
os parietale length, L-Br55666057
basicranial length, B-ho8288-89
greatest frontal breadth, Ect-Ect849495-
smallest frontal breadth, fs-fs113143130128
breadth at f. supraorbitalia, Sp-Sp87838875
breadth of the braincase, eu-eu110110112107
greatest mastoid breadth, ot-ot147153155148
greatest occipital breadth126125-120
breadth of the cond. occipitalis8378-78
height of the f. magnum, B-O2730-33
breadth of the f. magnum3528-36
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bartosiewicz, L. Human Impact on Antler Conformation in Western Red Deer (Cervus elaphus elaphus Linnaeus, 1758). Heritage 2021, 4, 4233-4248. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040233

AMA Style

Bartosiewicz L. Human Impact on Antler Conformation in Western Red Deer (Cervus elaphus elaphus Linnaeus, 1758). Heritage. 2021; 4(4):4233-4248. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040233

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bartosiewicz, László. 2021. "Human Impact on Antler Conformation in Western Red Deer (Cervus elaphus elaphus Linnaeus, 1758)" Heritage 4, no. 4: 4233-4248. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040233

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop