Next Article in Journal
Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence and Wisdom in the Global Sustainable Information Society
Previous Article in Journal
Quantifying the Log Reduction of Pathogenic Microorganisms by Constructed Wetlands: A Review
Open AccessProceedings

Ethical Responsibility vs. Ethical Responsiveness in Conscious and Unconscious Communication Agents

Faculty of Philosophy, Pontifical Lateran University, 00120 Vatican City, Italy
Workshop Hacking Societies, Habits and Rituals, Berkeley, California, USA, 2–6 June 2019.
Proceedings 2020, 47(1), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings47010068
Published: 14 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of IS4SI 2019 Summit)
In this contribution, I start from Levy’s precious suggestion about the neuroethics of distinguishing between “the slow-conscious responsibility” of us as persons, versus “the fast-unconscious responsiveness” of sub-personal brain mechanisms studied in cognitive neurosciences. However, they are both accountable for how they respond to the environmental (physical, social, and ethical) constraints. I propose to extend Levy’s suggestion to the fundamental distinction between “moral responsibility of conscious communication agents” versus the “ethical responsiveness of unconscious communication agents”, like our brains but also like the AI decisional supports. Both, indeed, can be included in the category of the “sub-personal modules” of our moral agency as persons. I show the relevance of this distinction, also from the logical and computational standpoints, both in neurosciences and computer sciences for the actual debate about an ethically accountable AI. Machine learning algorithms, indeed, when applied to automated supports for decision making processes in several social, political, and economic spheres are not at all “value-free” or “amoral”. They must satisfy an ethical responsiveness to avoid what has been defined as the unintended, but real, “algorithmic injustice”.
Keywords: neuroethics; digital ethics; quantum field theory neuroethics; digital ethics; quantum field theory
MDPI and ACS Style

Basti, G. Ethical Responsibility vs. Ethical Responsiveness in Conscious and Unconscious Communication Agents. Proceedings 2020, 47, 68.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop