A New Efficient Route to 2-Alkylsemicarbazides †

: Synthesis of hardly available 2-alkylsemicarbazides and their hydrochlorides from semicarbazide hydrochloride has been developed. This general and efficient protocol is based on preparation of acetone semicarbazone, its N2-alkylation in the presence of sodium hydride, and hydrolysis under mild conditions.

All of the above approaches to 2-alkylsemicarbazides are based on construction of semicarbazide fragment by N-N or С-N bond formation and have such drawbacks as multistep procedures, laborious isolation of products, low yields, use of highly toxic reagents, poor scalability, etc.
We hypothesized that general and preparative synthesis of 2-alkylsemicarbazides could be developed starting from commercially available unsubstituted semicarbazide. However, higher basicity and nucleophilicity of the nitrogen N1 in semicarbazide compared with the amide nitrogens N2 and N4 (e.g., pKa = 3.86 [22] and pKa = 0.053 [23] for protonated semicarbazide and urea, respectively, in water at 25 °C) inhibits direct alkylation at the nitrogen N2. Therefore, the N(1)H2 group should be protected with an electron-withdrawing alkylidene or arylidene group, which results in a decrease in nucleophilicity of the nitrogen N1 and a significant increase in acidity of the N(2)H group. Deprotonation of the N(2)H group with appropriate base, followed by alkylation and deprotection, would provide the target products. To our knowledge, there is only one report describing the application of this approach [24]. Namely, 2-{3-[4-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl]prop-1-yl}semicarbazide was prepared by deprotonation of benzaldehyde semicarbazone with NaNH2 (1,4-dioxane, reflux, 1 h), followed by alkylation with 3-[4-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl]propyl chloride (reflux, 18 h) and hydrolysis (water, H2C2O4, reflux) with removal of benzaldehyde formed by steam distillation. However, reaction time of the last step and isolation and purification of the target semicarbazide, as well as yields in the alkylation and hydrolysis steps, were not described. Since the acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of semicarbazones of aromatic aldehydes is known to proceed under drastic conditions, along with the formation of side products, e.g., hydrazines from initially formed semicarbazides [18], we supposed that hydrolytically labile semicarbazones of aliphatic ketones would be the best starting materials.
Herein, we report a reliable method for selective N2-alkylation of semicarbazones to give 2-alkylsemicarbazones. A general three-step synthesis of 2-alkylsemicarbazides from semicarbazide hydrochloride involving preparation of acetone semicarbazone, followed by its alkylation and mild hydrolysis, is also described.
We suppose that basicity of K2CO3 in DMF is not sufficient to generate essential concentrations of semicarbazone conjugated bases. It is noteworthy that the nature of semicarbazones, in particular their solubility in reaction media, may also play a role in the alkylation. Indeed, 4-substituted semicarbazone (E)-1c [40], which is more soluble in organic solvents than (E)-1a,b, was found to react with MeI in the presence of K2CO3 in DMF at room temperature to give the expected N-methylated product 2c, although the rate of this reaction is very low. According to NMR spectroscopic data, conversion of (E)-1c into 2c was 39% after 22 h, and 50% after 5 days (entry 4). The rate of methylation of (E)-1c with MeI in the presence of DBU (DMF, rt, 24 h) was also low, and only 14% conversion of the starting material into 2c was observed (NMR data) (entry 5). Use of MeONa in MeOH failed to give compound 2c.
We found that NaH in MeCN is the best choice for complete and selective N2-deprotonation of various semicarbazones. Treatment of (E)-1c with NaH (1.1 equiv.) in MeCN at room temperature smoothly gave the corresponding conjugated base which was reacted with excess of MeI (MeCN, rt, 2 h) to provide semicarbazone 2c in 97% yield (entry 6). Analogously, after deprotonation with NaH in MeCN, semicarbazone (E)-1b was alkylated with MeI (rt, 5.3 h) to afford compound 2b in 95% yield (entry 3), and semicarbazone (E)-1d was alkylated with MeI, EtI, BuI, or PhCH2Br to give the corresponding compounds 2d-g in 72-96% yields (entries 7-10). According to the 1 H NMR spectroscopic data, semicarbazones 2b-g were obtained as a single stereoisomer with (E)-configuration, the same as in the starting materials 1b-d.
Similarly, 2-benzyl-2h,i,k and 2-(4-methoxybenzyl)-substituted semicarbazones of aliphatic aldehydes 2j,l were prepared in 66-78% yields by alkylation of semicarbazones of propanal, butanal, or 2-methylpropanal 1e,f, (E)-1g after their deprotonation with NaH in MeCN (entries 11-15). Only a single stereoisomer of 2h-l, presumably with (E)-configuration, was obtained in each case. Interestingly, while semicarbazones of propanal (1e) and butanal (1f) used for the alkylation were mixtures of (E)-and (Z)-isomers in a ratio of 86:14 and 74:26, respectively (NMR data), the corresponding alkylated products 2h-g were isolated as (E)-isomers. It could be explained either by Z/E-isomerization in the course of the alkylation or by the fact that the minor (Z)-isomers were not alkylated and were lost during work up of reaction mixtures.
The most plausible Z/E-isomerization pathway in semicarbazones involves inversion at the N1 nitrogen atom [41]. We estimated energy barrier for the inversion in the conjugated base of ethanal semicarbazone using the DFT B3LYP/6-311++G (d, p) calculations. The IRC (Intrinsic Reaction Coordinate) analysis demonstrated that the found transition state connect the desired minima. The data obtained show that energy barrier for the conversion of (Z)-isomer into (E)-isomer (Scheme 3) is relatively high (39.35 kcal/mol). Since the alkylation of the conjugated base of 1e with PhCH2Br proceeds at room temperature ( Table 1, entry 11), Z/E-isomerization can be excluded. Thus, we suppose that the isolation of only (E)-isomers of 2h-j is due to the fact that (Z)-isomers of the starting materials 1e,f were not alkylated, presumably due to steric hindrance.
Next we applied the above conditions to the N2-alkylation of hydrolytically labile acetone semicarbazone (3). Starting, compound 3 was readily prepared from semicarbazide hydrochloride and acetone in the presence of sodium acetate (H2O, rt) according to routine procedure in excellent yield (Scheme 4). Compounds 4a-f were synthesized by the treatment of 3 with NaH (1.05-1.07 equiv.) in MeCN at room tempetature for 40-60 min, followed by the reaction of the generated conjugated base with excess of appropriate alkylating reagent. The degree of conversion of 3 into 4a-f was determined by 1 H NMR spectroscopic data for crude products isolated after removal of all volatiles under reduced pressure.
Reaction of the conjugated base of 3 with methyl iodide (10 equiv.) completed in MeCN at room temperature for 4 h. The resulting solution was evaporated to dryness under vacuum, the residue was dissolved in H2O, the solution was heated at 60 °С for 10-15 min, and the solvent was removed under vacuum. The obtained oily residue was triturated with Et2O/EtOH mixture (1:1) to give a solid product. 1 H NMR spectroscopic data showed that the isolated product was 2-methylsemicarbazide (6a) resulted from hydrolysis of 4a upon water treatment. According to the data of elemental analysis, the crystallized from EtOH or MeCN 6a contained 33 mol% of NaI. Therefore, we supposed that compound 6a formed a stable complex with NaI. Since 2-methylsemicarbazide is highly soluble in water, aqueous work up of crude product to remove NaI became inacceptable in contrast to 2b-d. Treatment of water solution of crude 6a with lead nitrate for the same purpose was inefficient.
Next we used dimethyl sulfate as methylating reagent instead of MeI. The reaction of the conjugated base of 3 with dimethyl sulfate (1.06 equiv.) smoothly proceeded at room temperature for 17 h to give semicarbazone 4a. After removal of the solvent under reduced pressure, compound 4a was readily hydrolyzed with excess of hydrochloric acid followed by evaporation of the solution formed under vacuum. Treatment of the obtained residue with cold i-PrOH afforded easy to handle crystalline 2-methylsemicarbazide hydrochloride (5a) in 72% yield (based on 3) ( Table 2, entry 1). Analogously, hydrochlorides of 2-ethyl-(5b), 2-propyl-(5c), and 2-butylsemicarbazides (5d) were prepared in 59-71% yields by the treatment of conjugated base of 3 with excess (5-10 equiv.) of the corresponding alkyl bromides (MeCN, reflux, 9 h), followed by the acidic workup (Table 2, entries 2-4).
It should be noted that the 2-alkylated semicarbazides can be also isolated as free bases 6a-e by treatment of reaction mixtures after their evaporation with aqueous Na2CO3, followed by extraction with EtOAc. However, it was more difficult to handle and purify free bases 6a-e compared with hydrochlorides 5a-e. In contrast, our attempts to obtain the analytically pure sample of hydrochloride 2-octylsemicarbazide (5f) prepared by the alkylation of 3 with octyl bromide (5.0 equiv.) (MeCN, reflux, 6.5 h) failed, while free base 6f was isolated in 58% yield (based on 3) (Table, entry 6) and readily purified.

Conclusions
An effective method for selective N2-alkylation of semicarbazones to give 2-alkylsemicarbazones has been developed. It involves deprotonation of semicarbazones with sodium hydride in MeCN, followed by treatment with alkylating reagents. This method was applied to general and convenient synthesis of 2-alkylsemicarbazides and their hydrochlorides, starting from commercially available semicarbazide hydrochloride. It is based on selective N2-alkylation of acetone semicarbazone under the action of sodium hydride and dimethyl sulfate or alkyl bromides. The resulting acetone 2-alkylsemicarbazones were hydrolyzed by fast heating (60 °С) with 17-36% hydrochloric acid to give the target products in 58-72% yields. Alkylation and hydrolytic steps were conveniently performed in one reaction flask, making the described approach very simple and preparative.