University of Birmingham Value Added Strategy for Unplanned Rail Track Inspections

On-demand (or unplanned) track inspection could be due to a disruption in a track geometry recording car [1–5]. [...]


General rights
Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law.
• Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. • Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. • User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of 'fair dealing' under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) • Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain.
Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.
When citing, please reference the published version.

Take down policy
While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
If you believe that this is the case for this document, please contact UBIRA@lists.bham.ac.uk providing details and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate. On-demand (or unplanned) track inspection could be due to a disruption in a track geometry recording car [1][2][3][4][5]. A proper selection of input-and output-memory order which is required for prediction of missing track measurement using a nonlinear autoregressive model with external series (NARX) is expected to create value added to the inspection decision.
For a M-meter length of unit track section, there could be sequence of track (measurement) points, denoted as ; 1, … , where / . Distance between two adjacent points is r meter and its value depends on the sampling rate employed by a track recording car during track measurement (inspection). Each is assigned with amplitude of track irregularity e.g., longitudinal level. Here, it is expressed as . In the event of disruption, a predicted value of is demanded as risk aversion towards unplanned train speed restrictions. The NARX model is formulated to predict track irregularity of a track section and is given as follows: where , ∈ ℝ denote, respectively, the input and output of the model at discrete unit step i, while 1 and 1and are the input-memory and output-memory orders [6]. Performance of the NARX model is however sensitive to a selection of and . In the context of our study, the corresponding selection problem can be solved by determining a segment of size L denoted as , … , ; , which minimizes the weighted error function wMSE given as follows [7].
where is the performance ratio, the network weights and biases and the number of hidden nodes in the network. The function wMSE represents the performance of NARX model in Equation (1) to predict track irregularity for a unit track section , . An example is prepared to demonstrate benefits of analyzing the effect of proper selection of segment S. Here, the NARX model takes measurement of track gauge, alignment (left and right) and the value of recent change in the longitudinal level calculated from two consecutive track inspections as external variables. An output of the model is longitudinal track irregularity over a 100 m unit track section. Related data series in the example is plotted in Figure 1. In this example, the value of L was 10 (is equivalent to 5 m track). Thirteen values of were selected as candidates for the segment S and their model performance is displayed in Figure 2. Results show the existence of variation in the performance of prediction model due to a different choice of position of S.  Disruptions in track geometry inspection create an opportunity to deliver value added to track inspections program. This goal can be achieved through an effective decision in assigning on-demand (manual) inspection to an affected track area. A case of missing longitudinal track irregularity where the missed values can be predicted by NARX is presented. The simulation results demonstrate that the segment selection step in NARX is beneficial to obtain rich information from unplanned track inspection. More simulation works are however required in future to strengthen the claim/suggestion.