Visual Learning and Innovative Teaching in Primary Schools: A Mixed-Methods Study of Foreign Pupils †
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Aim of the Research
- What effect does the systematic use of visual aids have on foreign pupils’ understanding of the language?
- Does visual learning affect participation and motivation levels at school?
- What perceptions do teachers and students have regarding the use of visual materials?
3. Methods
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Participants
- Age between 8 and 10 years, enrolled in Years 3–5 of primary school
- Italian or non-Italian citizenship
- Minimum Italian L2 proficiency at A1 level
- Regular school attendance
- Informed consent
- Certified cognitive or sensory disabilities
- Neurological disorders
- School absences exceeding 10% of the intervention period
- Experimental group (n = 60): followed an educational course focused on visual learning.
- Control group (n = 60): continued with traditional teaching, without systematic visual aids.
3.3. Tools
- Text comprehension test (MT Reading Test).
- Questionnaire on perceived self-efficacy and motivation (20 Likert items, α = 0.87).
- Structured observation of classroom interactions (participation, help, cooperation).
- Semi-structured interviews with 20 pupils and 6 teachers.
- Visual portfolio (concept maps, worksheets, videos, presentations).
- All tests were administered in pre–post mode.
3.4. Experimental Educational Protocol and Instructional Design
- the systematic use of concept maps, sequential images, educational videos, visual agendas, and illustrated storytelling;
- daily application in subjects such as English, maths, and science;
- preliminary training for the teachers involved.
4. Results
4.1. Quantitative Results
- -
- a language comprehension test for L2 students (CL-L2); and
- -
- the School Engagement Scale (SES) to assess motivation and school participation.
- Language Comprehension (CL-L2)
- School Engagement and Motivation (SES)
4.2. Qualitative Results
- ‘I understand better with images’
- ‘It’s easier to talk when I can see’
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Piaget, J. The Psychology of the Child; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Peterson, K. Creating Inclusive Learning Environments: Integrating Visual Strategies for Diverse Learners; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Cummins, J. Language, Power and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire; Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Echevarria, J.; Vogt, M.E.; Short, D.J. Making Content Comprehensible for English Learners: The SIOP Model; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Paivio, A. Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Can. J. Psychol. 1991, 45, 255–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, R.E. Multimedia Learning, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- CAST. Universal Design for Learning Guidelines 2.2; CAST: Glendale, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- MIUR. Indicazioni Nazionali per il Curricolo; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR): Roma, Italy, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Massaro, D.W.; Bersani, L. Visual Strategies for Language Learning and Acquisition; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Avgerinou, M.; Pettersson, R. Visual Literacy and Multimedia Learning: Theories and Practices; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Cottini, L. School Inclusion: From Emergency to the Design of Inclusive Paths; ETS: Roma, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 2000, 55, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ainsworth, S. The multiple representations principle in multimedia learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning; Mayer, R.E., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Lorusso, M.; Pinto, G. Visual Literacy in Education: A Pedagogical Approach to the Use of Visual Tools in Learning Processes; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Bottino, R.M. Teaching and Digital Technologies: The Integration of Multimedia in School Practices; FrancoAngeli: Milan, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Palma, D.D.; Gravino, G.; Palmiero, F.; Scala, G.; Tafuri, M.G. Visual Learning and Innovative Teaching in Primary Schools: A Mixed-Methods Study of Foreign Pupils. Proceedings 2026, 139, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026139010
Palma DD, Gravino G, Palmiero F, Scala G, Tafuri MG. Visual Learning and Innovative Teaching in Primary Schools: A Mixed-Methods Study of Foreign Pupils. Proceedings. 2026; 139(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026139010
Chicago/Turabian StylePalma, Davide Di, Gianluca Gravino, Fabiola Palmiero, Giovanna Scala, and Maria Giovanna Tafuri. 2026. "Visual Learning and Innovative Teaching in Primary Schools: A Mixed-Methods Study of Foreign Pupils" Proceedings 139, no. 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026139010
APA StylePalma, D. D., Gravino, G., Palmiero, F., Scala, G., & Tafuri, M. G. (2026). Visual Learning and Innovative Teaching in Primary Schools: A Mixed-Methods Study of Foreign Pupils. Proceedings, 139(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026139010
