Recent Advances in the Synthesis of Metal Oxide Nanofibers and Their Environmental Remediation Applications

Recently, wastewater treatment by photocatalytic oxidation processes with metal oxide nanomaterials and nanocomposites such as zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, zirconium dioxide, etc. using ultraviolet (UV) and visible light or even solar energy has added massive research importance. This waste removal technique using nanostructured photocatalysts is well known because of its effectiveness in disintegrating and mineralizing the unsafe organic pollutants such as organic pesticides, organohalogens, PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons), surfactants, microorganisms, and other coloring agents in addition to the prospect of utilizing the solar and UV spectrum. The photocatalysts degrade the pollutants using light energy, which creates energetic electron in the metal oxide and thus generates hydroxyl radical, an oxidative mediator that can oxidize completely the organic pollutant in the wastewater. Altering the morphologies of metal oxide photocatalysts in nanoscale can further improve their photodegradation efficiency. Nanoscale features of the photocatalysts promote enhance light absorption and improved photon harvest property by refining the process of charge carrier generation and recombination at the semiconductor surfaces and in that way boost hydroxyl radicals. The literature covering semiconductor nanomaterials and nanocomposite-assisted photocatalysis—and, among those, metal oxide nanofibers—suggest that this is an attractive route for environmental remediation due to their capability of reaching complete mineralization of organic contaminants under mild reaction conditions such as room temperature and ambient atmospheric pressure with greater degradation performance. The main aim of this review is to highlight the most recent published work in the field of metal oxide nanofibrous photocatalyst-mediated degradation of organic pollutants and unsafe microorganisms present in wastewater. Finally, the recycling and reuse of photocatalysts for viable wastewater purification has also been conferred here and the latest examples given.


Introduction
For the treatment of agricultural and industrial wastewater that contains traces of refractory organic compounds such as organic pesticides, surfactants, organohalogens, and coloring agents, wastewater purification technologies are now essential to build economical and more advanced treatment methods.In general, a combination of several approaches gives high treatment efficiency compared with existing treatments.For example, a certain pollutant can hardly be degraded by photolysis with conventional photocatalysts in the ambient environment and treated wastewater may need more steps for total mineralization [1][2][3][4].However, a combination of several methods, such as synthesizing suitable nanostructured catalysts and optimizing the wavelength of light exposure depending on the selection semiconductor material with favorable bandgap energy, improves the degradation of pollutants from the wastewater [5][6][7].
On the other hand, photocatalysis has an enormous potential for the elimination of organic pollutants from wastewater [6,[8][9][10].However, it is still not in practical use since it has a low oxidation rate.Therefore, a combination of selection of photocatalysts together with light source, which can boost oxidation, is reasonable for the management of hard-to-decompose organic pollutants.The challenging organic pollutants are then expected to decompose more rapidly and thoroughly in the presence of a suitable photocatalyst along with an appropriate light source.
In a broad sense, environmental remediation includes the elimination of agricultural, industrial pollutants, hard-to-decompose organic compounds, bacteria, germs, and fungus present in wastewater, along with cleansing of air pollutants such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen di-oxide (NOx).Figure 1 illustrates the idea of environmental remediation using photocatalysis.
Inventions 2017, 2, 9 2 of 29 such as synthesizing suitable nanostructured catalysts and optimizing the wavelength of light exposure depending on the selection semiconductor material with favorable bandgap energy, improves the degradation of pollutants from the wastewater [5][6][7].
On the other hand, photocatalysis has an enormous potential for the elimination of organic pollutants from wastewater [6,[8][9][10].However, it is still not in practical use since it has a low oxidation rate.Therefore, a combination of selection of photocatalysts together with light source, which can boost oxidation, is reasonable for the management of hard-to-decompose organic pollutants.The challenging organic pollutants are then expected to decompose more rapidly and thoroughly in the presence of a suitable photocatalyst along with an appropriate light source.
In a broad sense, environmental remediation includes the elimination of agricultural, industrial pollutants, hard-to-decompose organic compounds, bacteria, germs, and fungus present in wastewater, along with cleansing of air pollutants such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen di-oxide (NOx).Figure 1 illustrates the idea of environmental remediation using photocatalysis.Last year, Anjum et al. [11] published a comprehensive review article on environmental remediation using different nanomaterials.It is clear from their perspective that electrospun nanofibers and other hybrid nano-membranes are very effective for the efficient removal of organic dyes, heavy metals, and foulants.In a recent study, radially oriented ZnO nanowires were decorated on flexible poly-l-lactide nanofibers for continuous-flow photocatalytic water purification [12].The photocatalytic decomposition was monitored on various organic pollutant dyes, such as methylene blue, monocrotophos, and diphenylamine under illumination with UV light using this highly flexible hierarchical nanostructure.The same electrospun ZnO-poly-L-lactide nanofibers photocatalysts have been used for the adsorption of Cr(VI) as a crucial step for water purification by Burks et al. [13].
The main objective of this paper is to review the most recently published work in the field of ultraviolet-and visible-light-driven photocatalysis on wastewater treatment.The summary of photocatalytic degradation pollutant dyes, bacteria containing wastewater, and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in air degraded by various researchers using metal oxide nanofibers, including Last year, Anjum et al. [11] published a comprehensive review article on environmental remediation using different nanomaterials.It is clear from their perspective that electrospun nanofibers and other hybrid nano-membranes are very effective for the efficient removal of organic dyes, heavy metals, and foulants.In a recent study, radially oriented ZnO nanowires were decorated on flexible poly-l-lactide nanofibers for continuous-flow photocatalytic water purification [12].The photocatalytic decomposition was monitored on various organic pollutant dyes, such as methylene blue, monocrotophos, and diphenylamine under illumination with UV light using this highly flexible hierarchical nanostructure.The same electrospun ZnO-poly-L-lactide nanofibers photocatalysts have been used for the adsorption of Cr(VI) as a crucial step for water purification by Burks et al. [13].
The main objective of this paper is to review the most recently published work in the field of ultraviolet-and visible-light-driven photocatalysis on wastewater treatment.The summary of photocatalytic degradation pollutant dyes, bacteria containing wastewater, and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in air degraded by various researchers using metal oxide nanofibers, including information about the synthesis routes of different sizes of fibers, is presented in Table 1.All results using different organic effluents showed that the application of photocatalysis led to efficient and complete degradation and produced simple products that are environmentally safe; however, incomplete mineralization can result in the formation of highly toxic byproducts.

Table 1.
Table of metal oxide nanofiber photocatalysts and their environmental remediation applications.

Nanofibers
There is a serious disadvantage to nanoparticles: very often they become agglomerated while dispersed in an aqueous medium and the macroscopic properties are compromised [48,49].However, nanofibers overcome this problem owing to their fibrous form [50].In addition, the nanoscopic dimension naturally provides a high surface area to volume ratio.This characteristic makes them very attractive in applications where large surface area is necessary [51].Nanofibers are different to nanoparticles in terms of aspect ratios and not the same as nanotubes because of crystallographic properties.A fibrous morphology is beneficial over a particle morphology in several respects, e.g., the mechanism of photocatalysis, the function of noble metal, the heterojunctions, and the plasmonic properties.
The diameters of nanofibers are mainly determined by the nature of the precursor polymer used, the parameters involved, and the method of fabrication [55].There are various methods used to synthesize nanofibers, including electrospinning, dry spinning, thermal-induced phase separation, self-assembly, drawing, extrusion, template synthesis, etc. [56].Among these, electrospinning is the most frequently used technique to produce nanofibers.It has many advantages such as simple and straightforward setup, easy mass production of continuous nanofibers from numerous polymers, and, most interestingly, the ability to produce ultrathin fibers with tunable diameters, compositions, and alignments [57].This flexibility permits the shape controllability and organization of the fibers on any collector or even in the form of free-standing fibers so that many different structures such as hollow, core-shell, flat ribbon, and even spherical particles shaped by electrospraying can be fabricated on demand to meet the desired application requirements [58][59][60].Those special nanofiber structures and textures can be exploited in various advanced applications such as energy storage, gas sensors and biosensors, nanofluidics, catalysis and photocatalysis, drug delivery and release, catalytic nano supports, etc. [61][62][63][64][65][66].

Electrospinning
The electrospinning method offers a straightforward electrohydrodynamical mechanism [67][68][69] to yield fibers with diameters measuring less than 100 nm [70], even up to 10 nm [71].Widespread exploration has been done on the electrospinning technique to fabricate nanofibers [72].Based on the reported literature, the basic electrospinning setup (shown in Figure 2) essentially involved three key parts: a syringe with a metallic needle having a suitable polymeric melt, a high-voltage power supply, and a conducting collector with an adjustable configuration.The process of fabrication of the nanofiber starts when electrically charged particles travel into the polymeric melt through the metallic needle.This originates instability within the polymeric melt because of the induction of electrically charged particles on the polymer drop.Simultaneously, the mutual repulsive force of charged particles originates an electrical force that competes with the surface tension of the polymer, and finally the polymer melt proceeds in the direction of the electric force.An additional escalation in the electric field causes the spherical shaped droplet that emerges from the needle to distort and take on a conical shape.A static or rotating collector assembly, electrically grounded and kept at an optimal distance, collects the ultrafine nanofibers from the conical shaped droplet of the polymeric melt (Taylor cone) because of the high electrical field applied.A steady charged polymer jet from the needle to the collector can be formed only when the polymeric melt has enough cohesive force.Throughout the process, the internal (on the fiber) and external (applied electric field) forces on the charged particles cause the whipping motion of the liquid jet towards the collector.Because of this whipping motion, the polymeric chains within the melt stretch and slide past each other, which ultimately results in the form of fibers with diameters measured in the submicron to nanoscale [73,74].

Core-Shell Nanofibers
The spinnablity of a polymeric melt during electrospinning is governed by the viscosity and ionic conductivity solution, and the nature of the solvents, along with the molecular weight and the conformation of the polymer.It is important to note that several polymers are not electrospinnable because of their inadequate solubility in an electrospinning suitable solvent; however, an unspinnable polymer can form nanofibers by co-electrospinning with the help of a spinnable polymer in the same solution [75].Many dissimilar morphologies of nanofibers, for instance core-shell, hollow, and porous, bi-component structures, could be created with different designs of electrospinning spinnerets and nozzles.
In typical core-shell electrospinning, a coaxial jet is formed by a coaxial nozzle when two dissimilar liquids flow simultaneously through inner and outer capillaries [76].The free end of the nozzle is connected to a high-voltage electric power supply.The spun nanofibers are consolidated in the course of solvent evaporation and mechanical stretching.The ratio of the solution feeding rate of the two liquid components controls the uniformity and stability of the core and shell flow [77].Additionally, a few other parameters, such as the applied electric field strength, the shape and size of core-shell capillaries, the volume feed rate of each component, the immiscible nature of the core-shell materials, and their ionic conductivity and viscosity also play an essential role in shaping the uniform formation of core-shell jets and the morphology of the spun nanofibers [78].

Hollow and Porous Nanofibers
Hollow nanofibers are targeted for advanced and very specific applications, such as nanofluidics, photocatalysis, solar energy harvest, and hydrogen storage [79].Typically, two types

Core-Shell Nanofibers
The spinnablity of a polymeric melt during electrospinning is governed by the viscosity and ionic conductivity solution, and the nature of the solvents, along with the molecular weight and the conformation of the polymer.It is important to note that several polymers are not electrospinnable because of their inadequate solubility in an electrospinning suitable solvent; however, an unspinnable polymer can form nanofibers by co-electrospinning with the help of a spinnable polymer in the same solution [75].Many dissimilar morphologies of nanofibers, for instance core-shell, hollow, and porous, bi-component structures, could be created with different designs of electrospinning spinnerets and nozzles.
In typical core-shell electrospinning, a coaxial jet is formed by a coaxial nozzle when two dissimilar liquids flow simultaneously through inner and outer capillaries [76].The free end of the nozzle is connected to a high-voltage electric power supply.The spun nanofibers are consolidated in the course of solvent evaporation and mechanical stretching.The ratio of the solution feeding rate of the two liquid components controls the uniformity and stability of the core and shell flow [77].Additionally, a few other parameters, such as the applied electric field strength, the shape and size of core-shell capillaries, the volume feed rate of each component, the immiscible nature of the core-shell materials, and their ionic conductivity and viscosity also play an essential role in shaping the uniform formation of core-shell jets and the morphology of the spun nanofibers [78].

Hollow and Porous Nanofibers
Hollow nanofibers are targeted for advanced and very specific applications, such as nanofluidics, photocatalysis, solar energy harvest, and hydrogen storage [79].Typically, two types of techniques, including the direct co-axial spinning method [80] and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) methods, are used for the production of hollow nanofibers [81,82].
To produce hollow nanofibers by the electrospinning method, the co-axial spinning is considered, as shown in Figure 3.In co-axial electrospinning, nanofibers are prepared by following the same process as fabricating core-shell nanofibers; however, the core is removed with a selective solvent etching process at the end of the method [83-85].For example, poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) and tetra butyltitanate (Ti (OC 4 H 9 ) 4 ) were electrospun as shell solutions and paraffin oil or mineral oil was poured in as the core material.TiO 2 fibers with a hollow core structure were achieved when the polymer and core materials were removed by selective etching [18].Figure 4 shows the morphologies of hollow titanium dioxide nanofibers fabricated using the core-shell electrospinning technique, as reported by Sing et al. [18].
of techniques, including the direct co-axial spinning method [80] and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) methods, are used for the production of hollow nanofibers [81,82].
To produce hollow nanofibers by the electrospinning method, the co-axial spinning is considered, as shown in Figure 3.In co-axial electrospinning, nanofibers are prepared by following the same process as fabricating core-shell nanofibers; however, the core is removed with a selective solvent etching process at the end of the method [83-85].For example, poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) and tetra butyltitanate (Ti (OC4H9)4) were electrospun as shell solutions and paraffin oil or mineral oil was poured in as the core material.TiO2 fibers with a hollow core structure were achieved when the polymer and core materials were removed by selective etching [18].Figure 4 shows the morphologies of hollow titanium dioxide nanofibers fabricated using the core-shell electrospinning technique, as reported by Sing et al. [18].In the second CVD method, the first precursor polymer is converted to a nanofiber or a "template" using electrospinning.Then, the spun fibers are coated with either an appropriate polymer or a metal.Lastly, hollow fibers are obtained by removing the template material by selecting solvent etching or by calcining at high temperature in a furnace [83,[86][87][88][89].The diameter and morphology of such hollow nanofibers can also be easily tuned by controlling the electrospinning process parameters [83].In the second CVD method, the first precursor polymer is converted to a nanofiber or a "template" using electrospinning.Then, the spun fibers are coated with either an appropriate polymer or a metal.Lastly, hollow fibers are obtained by removing the template material by selecting solvent etching or by calcining at high temperature in a furnace [83,[86][87][88][89].The diameter and morphology of such hollow nanofibers can also be easily tuned by controlling the electrospinning process parameters [83].The applicability of porous nanofibers is more comprehensive and broad in contrast with core-shell and hallow nanofibers.Owing to their ultra-high BET surface areas, porous fibers find applications in membranes [90], filtration [91], fuel cells [92], catalysis [93], tissue engineering [94,95], and drug delivery and release [96].Porous nanofibers can be created with a distinctive topology by choosing precise solvents or a proper mixture of solvents, or polymer mixtures under an optimized environment.One approach could be based on phase separation of the polymeric components in a mixture caused by different evaporation rates.In this method, immiscible polymers are dissolved in a common solvent and electrospun.One of the polymers, either from the core or the shell of the spun fibers, is dissolved to achieve porous nanofibers.There are a few other methods for fabricating porous nanofibers, such as phase separation by vapor, non-solvent and thermally induced phase separation [97][98][99], rapid phase separation [100,101], selective dissolution [102], and selective calcination [102,103].

Metal Oxide Nanofibers
Metal oxide nanofibers have huge research importance for both 1D and 2D nanoscopic morphology due to their exclusive electrical and physicochemical properties.A range of uses has been proven in photovoltaic cells, light-emitting diodes, liquid crystal displays, lithium ion batteries, biosensors, and gas sensors.
There are many methods such as melt, colloid, solution, dry and co-axial electrospinning, CVD, PECVD, and electrochemical methods that are used to yield metal oxide and nanofibers [14,15,[104][105][106][107][108].In recent times, electrospun metal oxides' precursors have garnered much interest for the production of multifunctional nanofibers [109,110].Figure 5 defines the approach for the synthesis of an electrospun metal oxide nanofiber.There are two ways: either a metal oxide precursor is added to a polymer in the course of electrospinning solution preparation; also, it could be incorporated by dipping spun fibers into a precursor solution afterward.and 5), respectively (hollow morphologies of nanofibers can be seen in circular markings); and their TEM micrographs (e-h).Reproduced with permission from [18].Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry.
The applicability of porous nanofibers is more comprehensive and broad in contrast with core-shell and hallow nanofibers.Owing to their ultra-high BET surface areas, porous fibers find applications in membranes [90], filtration [91], fuel cells [92], catalysis [93], tissue engineering [94,95], and drug delivery and release [96].Porous nanofibers can be created with a distinctive topology by choosing precise solvents or a proper mixture of solvents, or polymer mixtures under an optimized environment.One approach could be based on phase separation of the polymeric components in a mixture caused by different evaporation rates.In this method, immiscible polymers are dissolved in a common solvent and electrospun.One of the polymers, either from the core or the shell of the spun fibers, is dissolved to achieve porous nanofibers.There are a few other methods for fabricating porous nanofibers, such as phase separation by vapor, non-solvent and thermally induced phase separation [97][98][99], rapid phase separation [100,101], selective dissolution [102], and selective calcination [102,103].

Metal Oxide Nanofibers
Metal oxide nanofibers have huge research importance for both 1D and 2D nanoscopic morphology due to their exclusive electrical and physicochemical properties.A range of uses has been proven in photovoltaic cells, light-emitting diodes, liquid crystal displays, lithium ion batteries, biosensors, and gas sensors.
There are many methods such as melt, colloid, solution, dry and co-axial electrospinning, CVD, PECVD, and electrochemical methods that are used to yield metal oxide and nanofibers [14,15,[104][105][106][107][108].In recent times, electrospun metal oxides' precursors have garnered much interest for the production of multifunctional nanofibers [109,110].Figure 5 defines the approach for the synthesis of an electrospun metal oxide nanofiber.There are two ways: either a metal oxide precursor is added to a polymer in the course of electrospinning solution preparation; also, it could be incorporated by dipping spun fibers into a precursor solution afterward.Generally, calcination of spun metal oxide nanofibers is a common method for large-scale production.Calcination is a two-step process whereby the polymer is eliminated at high temperature in an oxygen atmosphere and an oxidative conversion of the precursor constituent yields a metal oxide by nucleation and growth at high temperature [111,112].
The metal oxide centers can be incorporated into the nanofiber matrix either in situ or ex situ.A suitable organometallic or sol-gel metal oxide precursor has been introduced with electrospinning polymer melt in situ, whereas soaking nanofibers in a solvent comprising the desired metal oxide precursor produces a surface coating in the latter case.There are many works reported for the electrospinning of metal oxide nanofibers either by the sol−gel route [113][114][115][116], or by formation of a polymeric metal oxide colloidal dispersion ex situ [117][118][119].In the case of electrospinning from an inorganic precursor, the high-temperature calcination process causes a reduction in the diameter of the fibers as the sacrificial polymer template is selectively removed.Consequently, by reason of calcination, the resultant nanofibers become fragile owing to their thinner cross sections and the thermomechanical stress generated from the reduction in size [105,[120][121][122].There have been many efforts made in recent times towards the production of metal oxide nanofibers by the electrospinning route.For example, alumina, zinc oxide, silica, and TiO2 nanoparticles were mixed with the electrospinning polymer solution [118,[123][124][125]. Recently, Sharma's group used a sol-gel precursor of titanium dioxide, titanium isopropoxide, along with a polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer, for electrospinning and fabricated carbon-doped titania nanofibers, as shown in Figure 6 [15].Generally, calcination of spun metal oxide nanofibers is a common method for large-scale production.Calcination is a two-step process whereby the polymer is eliminated at high temperature in an oxygen atmosphere and an oxidative conversion of the precursor constituent yields a metal oxide by nucleation and growth at high temperature [111,112].
The metal oxide centers can be incorporated into the nanofiber matrix either in situ or ex situ.A suitable organometallic or sol-gel metal oxide precursor has been introduced with electrospinning polymer melt in situ, whereas soaking nanofibers in a solvent comprising the desired metal oxide precursor produces a surface coating in the latter case.There are many works reported for the electrospinning of metal oxide nanofibers either by the sol−gel route [113][114][115][116], or by formation of a polymeric metal oxide colloidal dispersion ex situ [117][118][119].In the case of electrospinning from an inorganic precursor, the high-temperature calcination process causes a reduction in the diameter of the fibers as the sacrificial polymer template is selectively removed.Consequently, by reason of calcination, the resultant nanofibers become fragile owing to their thinner cross sections and the thermomechanical stress generated from the reduction in size [105,[120][121][122].There have been many efforts made in recent times towards the production of metal oxide nanofibers by the electrospinning route.For example, alumina, zinc oxide, silica, and TiO 2 nanoparticles were mixed with the electrospinning polymer solution [118,[123][124][125]. Recently, Sharma's group used a sol-gel precursor of titanium dioxide, titanium isopropoxide, along with a polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer, for electrospinning and fabricated carbon-doped titania nanofibers, as shown in Figure 6 [15].In another work, ZnO nanofibers were produced using zinc acetate as an inorganic metal oxide precursor along with sacrificial carrier polymer polyacrylonitrile, which was removed during calcination [14].Figure 7 shows the morphology of the electrospun ZnO nanofibers.In another work, ZnO nanofibers were produced using zinc acetate as an inorganic metal oxide precursor along with sacrificial carrier polymer polyacrylonitrile, which was removed during calcination [14].Figure 7 shows the morphology of the electrospun ZnO nanofibers.In another work, ZnO nanofibers were produced using zinc acetate as an inorganic metal oxide precursor along with sacrificial carrier polymer polyacrylonitrile, which was removed during calcination [14].Figure 7 shows the morphology of the electrospun ZnO nanofibers.

Photocatalysis
Photocatalysis is a potential way to decontaminate amenities, houses, living environments, industrial waste, and numerous organic compounds as well as refractory chlorinated aromatics and more than 27,935 (from Web of Science Core Collection until March 2017) references have been collected on this discipline [126][127][128][129].As compared to other existing chemical oxidation techniques, photocatalysis may be more efficient since semiconductors photocatalysts are economical and can accomplish the complete mineralizing of various refractory compounds [130].By further adjusting and developing this technology, the pollution in our air and water can be decreased.One can even decrease the spread of pollutions, infections, and disease such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in clinics.This purification technology would be an advantage to the whole world.
Serpone and Emiline have argued that photocatalysis is the speeding up of a photoreaction by the action of a catalyst [131].An earlier IUPAC article defined photocatalysis as a catalytic reaction containing light absorption on a catalyst or a substrate.
Owing to its capability of generating energetic powerful oxidant species, i.e., OH free radicals, photocatalysis can be treated as an advanced oxidation process (AOP).The photochemical AOPs are light-induced reactions, mainly oxidations that depend on the creation of OH • by the grouping with supplied oxidants or semiconductor photocatalysts to the system [132].The photodegradation efficiency of AOPs is significantly improved either by homogeneous or heterogeneous photocatalysis [133].Heterogeneous photocatalysis hires photocatalyst slurries (for example: ZnO/UV, TiO 2 /UV, WO 3 , and BiVO 4 ) for catalysis, while homogeneous photocatalysis (for example: H 2 O 2 /UV, Fe 3+ /UV) is employed in a single-phase system.

Mechanism and Kinetics of Photocatalysis by Pure Metal Oxide Nanofibers
The energy difference between the valence band (VB) and the conduction band (CB) in a semiconductor is known as the "Band Gap".When a metal oxide semiconductor such as TiO 2 , ZnO, ZrO 2 , SnO 2 , CeO 2 , etc., absorbs ultraviolet light, it produces an electron-hole pair when the energy is greater than its bandgap energy.The photo-generated electron and hole are negatively and positively charged, respectively.The electron in the conduction band of the photocatalyst gets excited after absorbing photons from light.The electron reacts with an O 2 molecule and yields a superoxide anion.The holes are oxidants, meaning they can oxidize water, which results in the generation of oxygen.The electrons can reduce protons and generate hydrogen.This cycle persists as long as the light energy is accessible.
The chemical reactions in photocatalysis are illuminated as follows with the help of Equations ( 1)- (9).As ultraviolet light falls on the metal oxide semiconductor photocatalyst, one electron jumps from the valence band to the conduction band, leaving behind a hole.The semiconductors become more efficient if those photo-generated electrons and holes wait before recombining.The electrons in the conduction band react with the O 2 molecule and H + in the surrounding aqueous environment and harvest hydrogen peroxide, which then supplies the OH − ion and highly energized OH • free radical.Similarly, holes in the valance band react with water to produce an OH • free radical.Formation of those highly active species helps to decrease the recombination time of the electron-hole pair and thereby offers extra time for the reaction with the pollutants present in the wastewater.Figure 8 shows the idea of photocatalysis by metal oxide nanofibers thorough a pictorial illustration.The photocatalytic oxidation of pollutants present in wastewater under ultraviolet light can be described as follows [14]: Metal oxide nanofibers + hυ→ electron (e − )+ hole (h + ) (1) e − + O2→ O2 − (4) e − + H2O2→ OH • + OH − Pollutant in wastewater + OH • → clean water and degradation products (7) Pollutant in wastewater + metal oxide nanofibers (h + ) → oxidation products (8) Pollutant in wastewater + metal oxide nanofibers (e − ) → reduction products (9) The recombination process of the electron-hole pair involves additional energy created from the excited electron, which arises as heat.Since the recombination is undesirable and leads to ineffectual photocatalysis, the key aim of the metal oxide photocatalysts is to produce a catalytic reaction among the conduction band excited electrons and oxidant to yield a reduced product.A reaction among the positively charged holes with a reductant is essential to producing an oxidized product.It is worth mentioning that the reduction and oxidation reactions happen at the nanofiber surface from the time when this reaction generates positive holes and negative electrons.In the oxidative reaction, the hole stands with the moisture content on the fiber surface and returns a hydroxyl free radical.Moreover, if more oxygen is provided, this will act as an electron acceptor and delay the recombination rate, which further enhances the degradation of pollutants [15].Furthermore, the total time period for pollutant degradation rises with a decrease in nanofiber loading since that will not provide enough reaction sites.Figure 9 shows the typical photocatalysis of polyromantic hydrocarbon (PAH) dye anthracene, which is a pollutant present in wastewater [14].The fluorescence spectra refer to the gradual degradation of the pollutant by assessing its absorption over time.The photocatalytic oxidation of pollutants present in wastewater under ultraviolet light can be described as follows [14]: Metal oxide nanofibers + hυ → electron (e − )+ hole (h + ) (1) Pollutant in wastewater + OH • → clean water and degradation products (7) Pollutant in wastewater + metal oxide nanofibers (h + ) → oxidation products (8) Pollutant in wastewater + metal oxide nanofibers (e − ) → reduction products (9) The recombination process of the electron-hole pair involves additional energy created from the excited electron, which arises as heat.Since the recombination is undesirable and leads to ineffectual photocatalysis, the key aim of the metal oxide photocatalysts is to produce a catalytic reaction among the conduction band excited electrons and oxidant to yield a reduced product.A reaction among the positively charged holes with a reductant is essential to producing an oxidized product.It is worth mentioning that the reduction and oxidation reactions happen at the nanofiber surface from the time when this reaction generates positive holes and negative electrons.In the oxidative reaction, the hole stands with the moisture content on the fiber surface and returns a hydroxyl free radical.Moreover, if more oxygen is provided, this will act as an electron acceptor and delay the recombination rate, which further enhances the degradation of pollutants [15].Furthermore, the total time period for pollutant degradation rises with a decrease in nanofiber loading since that will not provide enough reaction sites.Figure 9 shows the typical photocatalysis of polyromantic hydrocarbon (PAH) dye anthracene, which is a pollutant present in wastewater [14].The fluorescence spectra refer to the gradual degradation of the pollutant by assessing its absorption over time.

Mechanisms of Photocatalysis by Metal/Metal Oxide Composite Nanofibers
Metal oxide nanofibers have spurred enormous research interest in photocatalysis as they have the ability to produce charge carriers when exposed to ultraviolet light.The interesting electron bandgap configurations, exceptional light harvest properties, and efficient charge transport characteristics of the metal oxide nanofibers have made them efficient photocatalysts.However, there are some weaknesses in metal oxide photocatalysts, for instance, quick recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs and a wide bandgap, which creates the opportunity to fabricate new composite photocatalysts.
The main objective of engineering composite nanofiber photocatalysts is to adjust the photoelectrochemical properties of the metal oxide counterpart and thus a series of metal-metal oxide and metal oxide-metal oxide composite nanofibers have been prepared to simplify charge recombination in the semiconducting nanofibrous nanostructures [134][135][136][137].In this context in a noble metal/metal oxide nanofiber, the metal can act as a sink for photoproduced charge carriers and hence helps with interfacial charge transfer processes in composite photocatalysts during the course of photocatalysis [138].Figure 10 illustrates the electron transfer process in a metal-metal oxide nanofiber photocatalytic system.
These metal-metal oxide hybrid nanofibers can show characteristics of their singular counterparts or produce completely new properties when these two phases are combined together in composite nanofibers.In an ideal situation, photocreated charge carriers could be transferred very quickly from one constituent of the composite to the other due to modified electronic band arrangements, thus decreasing the possibility of radiative electron-hole recombination and allowing their use in chemical reactions for longer [139,140].Additionally, these metal-metal oxide nanofibers, because they can be designed to have several different facets on their surface, create a higher possibility for the absorption of targeted pollutant molecules during photocatalysis [139,141].For example, recently research has been done to incorporate noble metals into metal oxides to increase the photocatalytic efficiency of titania [142].Reprinted from [14].Copyright (2013), with permission from Elsevier.

Mechanisms of Photocatalysis by Metal/Metal Oxide Composite Nanofibers
Metal oxide nanofibers have spurred enormous research interest in photocatalysis as they have the ability to produce charge carriers when exposed to ultraviolet light.The interesting electron bandgap configurations, exceptional light harvest properties, and efficient charge transport characteristics of the metal oxide nanofibers have made them efficient photocatalysts.However, there are some weaknesses in metal oxide photocatalysts, for instance, quick recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs and a wide bandgap, which creates the opportunity to fabricate new composite photocatalysts.
The main objective of engineering composite nanofiber photocatalysts is to adjust the photoelectrochemical properties of the metal oxide counterpart and thus a series of metal-metal oxide and metal oxide-metal oxide composite nanofibers have been prepared to simplify charge recombination in the semiconducting nanofibrous nanostructures [134][135][136][137].In this context in a noble metal/metal oxide nanofiber, the metal can act as a sink for photoproduced charge carriers and hence helps with interfacial charge transfer processes in composite photocatalysts during the course of photocatalysis [138].Figure 10 illustrates the electron transfer process in a metal-metal oxide nanofiber photocatalytic system.
These metal-metal oxide hybrid nanofibers can show characteristics of their singular counterparts or produce completely new properties when these two phases are combined together in composite nanofibers.In an ideal situation, photocreated charge carriers could be transferred very quickly from one constituent of the composite to the other due to modified electronic band arrangements, thus decreasing the possibility of radiative electron-hole recombination and allowing their use in chemical reactions for longer [139,140].Additionally, these metal-metal oxide nanofibers, because they can be designed to have several different facets on their surface, create a higher possibility for the absorption of targeted pollutant molecules during photocatalysis [139,141].For example, recently research has been done to incorporate noble metals into metal oxides to increase the photocatalytic efficiency of titania [142].Plasmonic properties for the degradation of organic compounds under visible light were first proved by Ohtani's group in 2009 [143] (and even earlier by Tatsuma [144], but for other applications-photocurrent).TiO2 nanofibers codecorated with Au and Pt nanoparticles for plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic activities were reported by Zhang et al. [145].These attractive features of metal-metal oxide photocatalytic nanofibers motivated many researchers to investigate the impact of metal nanoparticles on semiconductors during photocatalysis.

Mechanisms of Photocatalysis by Metal Oxide/Metal Oxide Composite Nanofibers
Coupling metal oxides with other metal oxide semiconductors is another widely held method to tune the optical energy band configuration of photocatalysts and increase photon quantum efficiency, since coupled semiconductors can increase the separation rate of photoinduced electron-hole pairs in photocatalysts.Different from usual semiconductors, metal oxide nanofibers have no forbidden energy gap separating occupied and unoccupied levels, but they can excite electrons between bands to generate a high carrier mobility to simplify kinetic charge separation process.As illustrated in Figure 11, well contacted metal oxide-metal oxide nanofibers are advantageous for forming phase junctions.Generally, in metal/metal oxide semiconductor nanofibers, the metal component can trap the photogenerated charge carriers and promotes the interfacial charge-transfer processes, causing quick recombination and therefore hindering photocatalytic efficiency.In recent years, substantial effort has been employed toward combining metal oxide semiconductor nanostructures with suitable metallic oxide materials to synergize their properties [146][147][148][149].For instance, a metallic metal oxide (Ti5O9)-metal oxide (TiO2) nanocomposite has been developed as the heterojunction to enhance visible-light photocatalytic activity [150].Compared to the nanoparticles' nanostructures, the TiO2/ZnO hybrid nanofiber composites are confirmed as a highly efficient photocatalyst for encouraging applications in the wastewater treatment of organic-polluted water [151].Plasmonic properties for the degradation of organic compounds under visible light were first proved by Ohtani's group in 2009 [143] (and even earlier by Tatsuma [144], but for other applications-photocurrent).TiO 2 nanofibers codecorated with Au and Pt nanoparticles for plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic activities were reported by Zhang et al. [145].These attractive features of metal-metal oxide photocatalytic nanofibers motivated many researchers to investigate the impact of metal nanoparticles on semiconductors during photocatalysis.

Mechanisms of Photocatalysis by Metal Oxide/Metal Oxide Composite Nanofibers
Coupling metal oxides with other metal oxide semiconductors is another widely held method to tune the optical energy band configuration of photocatalysts and increase photon quantum efficiency, since coupled semiconductors can increase the separation rate of photoinduced electron-hole pairs in photocatalysts.Different from usual semiconductors, metal oxide nanofibers have no forbidden energy gap separating occupied and unoccupied levels, but they can excite electrons between bands to generate a high carrier mobility to simplify kinetic charge separation process.As illustrated in Figure 11, well contacted metal oxide-metal oxide nanofibers are advantageous for forming phase junctions.Generally, in metal/metal oxide semiconductor nanofibers, the metal component can trap the photogenerated charge carriers and promotes the interfacial charge-transfer processes, causing quick recombination and therefore hindering photocatalytic efficiency.In recent years, substantial effort has been employed toward combining metal oxide semiconductor nanostructures with suitable metallic oxide materials to synergize their properties [146][147][148][149].For instance, a metallic metal oxide (Ti 5 O 9 )-metal oxide (TiO 2 ) nanocomposite has been developed as the heterojunction to enhance visible-light photocatalytic activity [150].Compared to the nanoparticles' nanostructures, the TiO 2 /ZnO hybrid nanofiber composites are confirmed as a highly efficient photocatalyst for encouraging applications in the wastewater treatment of organic-polluted water [151].

Wastewater Treatment
The AOP is a well-known photocatalytic water treatment technique to treat pollutant-containing wastewater, air and various industry effluents and is regarded as one of the most promising methods [152,153].Figure 12 illustrates how photocatalysis helps degrade organic pollutants in wastewater with the help of metal oxide nanofibers.Common solid metal oxide nanofiber photocatalysts such as TiO2, ZnO, WO3, and BiVO4 are known to have outstanding photocatalytic properties.Among them, TiO2 and ZnO are the most extensively used due to their superior chemical stability, low toxicity, low cost, and extraordinary photocatalytic activity [154,155].

Wastewater Treatment
The AOP is a well-known photocatalytic water treatment technique to treat pollutant-containing wastewater, air and various industry effluents and is regarded as one of the most promising methods [152,153].Figure 12 illustrates how photocatalysis helps degrade organic pollutants in wastewater with the help of metal oxide nanofibers.Common solid metal oxide nanofiber photocatalysts such as TiO 2 , ZnO, WO 3 , and BiVO 4 are known to have outstanding photocatalytic properties.Among them, TiO 2 and ZnO are the most extensively used due to their superior chemical stability, low toxicity, low cost, and extraordinary photocatalytic activity [154,155].

Wastewater Treatment
The AOP is a well-known photocatalytic water treatment technique to treat pollutant-containing wastewater, air and various industry effluents and is regarded as one of the most promising methods [152,153].Figure 12 illustrates how photocatalysis helps degrade organic pollutants in wastewater with the help of metal oxide nanofibers.Common solid metal oxide nanofiber photocatalysts such as TiO2, ZnO, WO3, and BiVO4 are known to have outstanding photocatalytic properties.Among them, TiO2 and ZnO are the most extensively used due to their superior chemical stability, low toxicity, low cost, and extraordinary photocatalytic activity [154,155].Recently, ultrafine porous TiO 2 nanofiber diameters in the range of 10 nm were produced from electrospun rice-shaped TiO 2 nanostructures [156].The rice-shaped TiO 2 achieved by heating the as-spun TiO 2 -polyvinyl acetate composite nanofibers in air followed hydrothermal treatment, acid treatment, and low-temperature sintering.The synthesized TiO 2 nanofibers exhibited better photocatalytic activity than the commercial P-25 TiO 2 towards the degradation of methyl orange dye.ZnO nanofibers are also gaining huge attention in wastewater treatment owing to their outstanding photocatalytic properties; for example, Gupta et al. [157] fabricated photocatalytic ZnO nanofibers by the electrospinning method to degrade acid fuchsin dye in natural solar radiations.A review article on electrospun ZnO nanofibers for the photocatalysis of organic-dye-containing wastewater appeared two years ago from Panthi et al. [158].Due to their great photocatalytic degradation ability, stable physical properties, low cost, reusability, and recyclability, WO 3 nanofibers have also been studied widely in wastewater treatment [159,160].Early this year, Ma and coworkers constructed novel WO 3 /Fe(III) photocatalytic nanofibers that show enhanced photocatalytic activity by means of interfacial charge transfer effect under visible light irradiation [161].Furthermore, Bi and its oxides are well-known, cost-effective and multifunctional nanostructured materials, and have attracted numerous interest because of their excellent photocatalytic activity [162,163].In light to this, bismuth vanadate and cerium dioxide (BiVO 4 /CeO 2 ) composite nanofibers were produced by electrospinning and a homogeneous precipitation method with hydrothermal techniques [164].Their visible-light-driven photocatalysis was evaluated via the degradation of methylene blue, methyl orange, and a mixture of those dyes.Moreover, a series of environmental remediation applications using metal-metal oxide core-shell nanofibrous nanostructures exploited the special advantages of morphology and highly accessible surface areas [165,166].One-dimensional magnetite/manganese Fe 2 O 3 modified by carbon coating and with TiO 2 nanoparticles into porous core-shell composite nanofibers were fabricated via organometallic compounds as templates [167].These recyclable metal oxide photocatalytic nanofibers showed superior adsorption and photocatalytic properties for the efficient treatment of aqueous dye-containing waste.

Water Disinfection and Air Cleansing
The photocatalytic cleaning of wastewater using metal oxide nanocatalysts has attracted substantial research interest over the past few decades.Several types of photocatalysts have been tested for a variety of cleaning applications-for instance, bacterial pollutant and air contaminant removal with wastewater treatment and metal oxide nanofibers [168].The decontamination of microorganisms from wastewater is an essential application of photocatalysis.The photocatalysts for environmental cleansing applications mostly involve either titanium dioxide or zinc oxide; however, they displayed different activities when they reacted with different bacterial systems.Figure 13 explains the mechanisms for microorganism cleansing using photocatalysis.Photocatalysis is often achieved by damaging the membrane of the bacterial cell and inducing oxidative stress by a highly energetic OH • radical, which is also known as a reactive oxygen species (ROS).This photocatalyst can also attack the bacterial cell wall and release metal ions when needed.For example, a zinc oxide nanofiber can produce zinc ions and a titanium dioxide nanofiber can release titanium.These mechanisms could be more effective when exposed to light illumination.The formation of reactive oxygen species would be significantly greater upon light exposure with photon energy greater than the bandgap energy of the metal oxide nanofiber.However, few metal oxide nanofibers can yield ROS in the absence of photon energy, even upon sub-bandgap radiation.The interaction between the nanofibers and bacterial cells could be significantly affected due to the entrapment of photo-generated charge carriers on the surface of the photocatalyst if there is any photocorrosion present.This could change the electrostatic attraction to negatively-charged bacterial cell walls since metal ion release from the metal oxide is heavily affected by photocorrosion.
It is desirable to achieve the bacterial disinfection of wastewater under solar or visible light by nanofiber photocatalysts.While ZnO shows strong antibacterial properties under ambient radiation, TiO2 generally responds under UV radiation [169,170].Methods for completing the photocatalysis of waterborne microorganisms into visible and solar light energy have been obtained by making composites, design of core-shell type nanostructures, nanoparticle doping, surface wettability patterning, offset printing, or increase of crystal defect [170].
Photocatalytic disinfection of wastewater using a TiO2-Pt nanocatalyst was first reported by Matsunaga et al. [171]; they showed the degradation of many microorganisms such as Lactobacillus acidophilus (bacteria), Escherichia coli (bacteria), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast).It was also confirmed that the catalysts have no toxicity towards human cervical cancer cells (HeLa cells) and photocatalysts could be easily recycled and reused for their antibacterial activities.Last year La2O3 nanoparticle-doped PAN nanofiber mats were prepared by an electrospinning process [172].The metal oxide nanofibers were applied for bacterial inactivation based on a feasible antibacterial strategy through phosphate starvation.In addition to this, the polymer/metal oxide composite nanofiber mats were reusable and easy to recycle.
Above and beyond pollutant and microorganism removal from wastewater, metal oxide nanofibers are also effective in the degradation of volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides, ammonia, sulfur oxides, and carbon monoxide, which are also treated as environmental pollutants [168,[173][174][175].

Other Applications
Nanofiber nanostructures are also widely involved in several other applications such as textiles, wound dressings, prosthetic kits, dental care, bioimplants, microsurgical and external corporeal devices, drug delivery, tissue engineering, etc. [67,[176][177][178].In addition, metal oxide nanofibers have revealed a wide spectrum of new applications in energy storage, stem cell research, biomaterial sciences, and biochemistry owing to their favorable morphology and ideal physicochemical properties [104,[179][180][181].It is worth mentioning that Sabba et al. [182] demonstrated a maskless synthesis of TiO2-nanofiber-based hierarchical structures and used them in solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells.Volatile organic compound-based sensors have been constructed on electrospun crystalline ZnO and CeO2/ZnO nanofibrous mats and their sensing characteristics have been demonstrated for benzene, propanol, ethanol, and dichloromethane [183].Metal oxide nanofibers have found application in tissue engineering, where they could be used as a scaffold material that drives cell differentiation and can create an osteogenic environment without the use of exogenous factors [184].Carbon-cobalt [185] and highly porous ZnCo2O4 composite [186] nanofibers were synthesized by the electrospinning technique and exhibit potential application as an anode material for lithium ion batteries.Recently, Ali et al. [187] fabricated a microfluidic immuno-biochip to detect breast cancer biomarkers that is based on a hierarchical composite of porous graphene and The interaction between the nanofibers and bacterial cells could be significantly affected due to the entrapment of photo-generated charge carriers on the surface of the photocatalyst if there is any photocorrosion present.This could change the electrostatic attraction to negatively-charged bacterial cell walls since metal ion release from the metal oxide is heavily affected by photocorrosion.
It is desirable to achieve the bacterial disinfection of wastewater under solar or visible light by nanofiber photocatalysts.While ZnO shows strong antibacterial properties under ambient radiation, TiO 2 generally responds under UV radiation [169,170].Methods for completing the photocatalysis of waterborne microorganisms into visible and solar light energy have been obtained by making composites, design of core-shell type nanostructures, nanoparticle doping, surface wettability patterning, offset printing, or increase of crystal defect [170].
Photocatalytic disinfection of wastewater using a TiO 2 -Pt nanocatalyst was first reported by Matsunaga et al. [171]; they showed the degradation of many microorganisms such as Lactobacillus acidophilus (bacteria), Escherichia coli (bacteria), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast).It was also confirmed that the catalysts have no toxicity towards human cervical cancer cells (HeLa cells) and photocatalysts could be easily recycled and reused for their antibacterial activities.Last year La 2 O 3 nanoparticle-doped PAN nanofiber mats were prepared by an electrospinning process [172].The metal oxide nanofibers were applied for bacterial inactivation based on a feasible antibacterial strategy through phosphate starvation.In addition to this, the polymer/metal oxide composite nanofiber mats were reusable and easy to recycle.
Above and beyond pollutant and microorganism removal from wastewater, metal oxide nanofibers are also effective in the degradation of volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides, ammonia, sulfur oxides, and carbon monoxide, which are also treated as environmental pollutants [168,[173][174][175].

Other Applications
Nanofiber nanostructures are also widely involved in several other applications such as textiles, wound dressings, prosthetic kits, dental care, bioimplants, microsurgical and external corporeal devices, drug delivery, tissue engineering, etc. [67,[176][177][178].In addition, metal oxide nanofibers have revealed a wide spectrum of new applications in energy storage, stem cell research, biomaterial sciences, and biochemistry owing to their favorable morphology and ideal physicochemical properties [104,[179][180][181].It is worth mentioning that Sabba et al. [182] demonstrated a maskless synthesis of TiO 2 -nanofiber-based hierarchical structures and used them in solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells.Volatile organic compound-based sensors have been constructed on electrospun crystalline ZnO and CeO 2 /ZnO nanofibrous mats and their sensing characteristics have been demonstrated for benzene, propanol, ethanol, and dichloromethane [183].Metal oxide nanofibers have found application in tissue engineering, where they could be used as a scaffold material that drives cell differentiation and can create an osteogenic environment without the use of exogenous factors [184].Carbon-cobalt [185] and highly porous ZnCo 2 O 4 composite [186] nanofibers were synthesized by the electrospinning technique and exhibit potential application as an anode material for lithium ion batteries.Recently, Ali et al. [187] fabricated a microfluidic immuno-biochip to detect breast cancer biomarkers that is based on a hierarchical composite of porous graphene and electrospun TiO 2 nanofibers.Direct electrospinning of titania nanofibers on a conducting electrode was used to construct a cholesterol biosensor (Figure 14 describes the synthesis and application of nanofibers as an enzymatic biosensor) that can detect esterified cholesterol from human blood with excellent sensitivity (181.6 µA/mg•dL −1 /cm 2 ) and rapid detection (20 s) [105].Additionally, metal oxide nanofibers have found huge importance in immunolabeling, cell and molecular bioimaging, biosensing, treatment of tumor cells, soil nutrient sensing, and numerous photosensitive applications [188][189][190][191][192].

Recycling of Nanofiber Photocatalysts
While designing a photocatalytic reactor for wastewater treatment, the combination of a high surface area porous catalytic supporter with suitably planned nanostructured photocatalysts together with their recycling and reuse is a must.There are several types of photoreactors that have been used for wastewater treatment such as cascade photoreactor, downflow contactor reactor, and annular slurry reactor.Photocatalytic reactors for wastewater treatment are of two types, depending on the installed state of the photocatalysts, namely slurry reactors with suspended photocatalysts (Figure 15a) and immobilized reactors with photocatalysts immobilized onto a static inert support

Recycling of Nanofiber Photocatalysts
While designing a photocatalytic reactor for wastewater treatment, the combination of a high surface area porous catalytic supporter with suitably planned nanostructured photocatalysts together with their recycling and reuse is a must.There are several types of photoreactors that have been used for wastewater treatment such as cascade photoreactor, downflow contactor reactor, and annular slurry reactor.Photocatalytic reactors for wastewater treatment are of two types, depending on the installed state of the photocatalysts, namely slurry reactors with suspended photocatalysts (Figure 15a) and immobilized reactors with photocatalysts immobilized onto a static inert support (Figure 15b).The difference between these two main candidates is that the former needs an extra downstream separation unit for the recycling and recovery catalysts, whereas the latter permits continuous operation.There is another notable reactor named a tubular continuous flow reactor (shown in Figure 15c).A mechanical peristaltic pump is located between the reactor feed line and the reservoir tank and pumps the polluted water from the main wastewater reservoir to the tubular reaction zone.The reactor tube is of quartz glass coated with nanofiber photocatalysts and designed in such a way that it could harvest a sufficient amount of illuminated light energy for photocatalysis.
(Figure 15b).The difference between these two main candidates is that the former needs an extra downstream separation unit for the recycling and recovery catalysts, whereas the latter permits continuous operation.There is another notable reactor named a tubular continuous flow reactor (shown in Figure 15c).A mechanical peristaltic pump is located between the reactor feed line and the reservoir tank and pumps the polluted water from the main wastewater reservoir to the tubular reaction zone.The reactor tube is of quartz glass coated with nanofiber photocatalysts and designed in such a way that it could harvest a sufficient amount of illuminated light energy for photocatalysis.The reuse and recycling of photocatalysts is essential since this can reduce the cost of the overall waste management process.Thus, effective engineering is important for creating photocatalysts that could be easily recycled and reused several times.In this context, membrane filtration is a clever exercise for recycling soluble photocatalysts as well.Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration are two familiar membrane filtration techniques for recycling photocatalysts owing to their potential use in enzymatic, organic, and homogeneous catalysis-mediated process intensification at the laboratory level as well as on a larger industrial scale [193,194].Nanofiltration in continuous flow mode is one more excellent way of recycling nanofiber photocatalysts; however, combining continuous flow with a membrane filtration reactor can be more convenient for efficient wastewater treatment [195].In this context of recycling, magnetic nanofiber photocatalysts are very useful since they can be easily recycled with an external magnetic field.For example, Zhang et al. [196] synthesized magnetic BiFeO3 nanofibers with wave node-like morphology by electrospinning.Those nanofibers exhibit highly enhanced photocatalytic properties under visible light.In a recent report, the doping of Fe into a TiO2/SnO2 hybrid nanofiber has also been proven to be an exceptional visible-light-driven photocatalyst with much higher photocatalytic activity than pristine TiO2/SnO2 hybrid nanofibers [197].The magnetic property against Fe-loading was characterized, and the corresponding The reuse and recycling of photocatalysts is essential since this can reduce the cost of the overall waste management process.Thus, effective engineering is important for creating photocatalysts that could be easily recycled and reused several times.In this context, membrane filtration is a clever exercise for recycling soluble photocatalysts as well.Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration are two familiar membrane filtration techniques for recycling photocatalysts owing to their potential use in enzymatic, organic, and homogeneous catalysis-mediated process intensification at the laboratory level as well as on a larger industrial scale [193,194].Nanofiltration in continuous flow mode is one more excellent way of recycling nanofiber photocatalysts; however, combining continuous flow with a membrane filtration reactor can be more convenient for efficient wastewater treatment [195].In this context of recycling, magnetic nanofiber photocatalysts are very useful since they can be easily recycled with an external magnetic field.For example, Zhang et al. [196] synthesized magnetic BiFeO 3 nanofibers with wave node-like morphology by electrospinning.Those nanofibers exhibit highly enhanced photocatalytic properties under visible light.In a recent report, the doping of Fe into a TiO 2 /SnO 2 hybrid nanofiber has also been proven to be an exceptional visible-light-driven photocatalyst with much higher photocatalytic activity than pristine TiO 2 /SnO 2 hybrid nanofibers [197].The magnetic property against Fe-loading was characterized, and the corresponding photocatalytic activity under visible light was assessed using Rhodamine B degradation as a model pollutant.
Moreover, these nanostructured photocatalytic nanofibers have strong and active magnetic behavior, which makes their recycling and reuse easy.Santala's report suggested a direction for the recycling and recovery of electrospun composite magnetic nanofiber photocatalysts using an external magnetic field [198].A recycling arrangement based on exchangeable water would be very efficient.Photocatalysis in organic, aqueous, and organic/aqueous media permits easy recovery of homogeneous catalyst nanofibers from the product phase.

Conclusions
After reviewing hundreds of the latest representative studies on the role of various semiconductor photocatalysts and their synthesis and applications for environmental remediation, we observed that there are many types of metal oxide photocatalysts nanostructures available depending on the choice of fabrication route and the nature of the application.Among them, metal oxide nanofiber morphologies are reasonably stable and could preserve their structural robustness when reused in an aqueous medium towards environmental remediation, bacterial decontamination, and air purification via ultraviolet, visible, or solar light-driven photocatalysis.Electrospinning has been recognized as an efficient technique for the fabrication of metal oxide nanofibers.Various polymers along with their compatible metal oxide precursors have been successfully electrospun into ultrafine fibers in recent times.
It was shown that photocatalytic oxidation using metal oxide semiconductor photocatalysts has significantly improved the ability to degrade organic pollutants under ultraviolet light.The main problem with photocatalytic AOPs lies in the high cost of reagents such as hydrogen peroxide or energy sources such as ultraviolet light and the higher bandgap energy of several semiconductors.For the photocatalytic oxidation process, the energy demand and cost of the metal oxide/UV could be considerably reduced by the use of solar irradiation and superior nanomorphology to access a higher active surface area.Adjusting their electronic, optical, and physicochemical properties can ensure that the metal oxides efficiently degrade pollutant dyes in visible solar radiation.
The synergistic effect, as depicted in Table 1, indicated the advantages of the application of the photocatalytic oxidation process.Photocatalytic oxidation could be proven as an efficient alternative method for the oxidation and elimination of recalcitrant organic species under specific conditions for the management of agricultural and industrial pollutants in wastewater.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Schematic for the representation of environmental remediation by photocatalysis.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Schematic for the representation of environmental remediation by photocatalysis.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the electrospinning setup with two coaxial nozzle for spinning core-shell nanofibers.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the electrospinning setup with two coaxial nozzle for spinning core-shell nanofibers.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.FESEM images of a TiO2 nanofiber mat produced upon the calcination of PVP/PVP/Ti(OiPr)4 composite fibers at 500 °C (a); a single titania nanofiber (b); a TEM image of the fibers (c); and a SAED pattern displaying the crystal planes of the anatase phase of TiO2 (d).The arrows indicate different crystal planes of TiO2.Reprinted with permission from [15].Copyright (2014) American Chemical Society.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. FEEM micrographs of ZnO nanofibers fabricated by calcining at different temperatures: (a) 450 °C; (b) 650 °C; (c) ZnO nanofibers collected in the form of a free standing mat calcined; and (d) a TEM micrograph of ZnO nanofibers and the selected area electron diffraction patterns (SAED) (inset).The arrows indicate different crystal planes of ZnO.Reprinted from [14].Copyright (2013), with permission from Elsevier.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.FESEM images of a TiO 2 nanofiber mat produced upon the calcination of PVP/PVP/Ti(OiPr) 4 composite fibers at 500 • C (a); a single titania nanofiber (b); a TEM image of the fibers (c); and a SAED pattern displaying the crystal planes of the anatase phase of TiO 2 (d).The arrows indicate different crystal planes of TiO 2 .Reprinted with permission from [15].Copyright (2014) American Chemical Society.

Inventions 2017, 2 , 9 10 of 29 Figure 6 .
Figure 6.FESEM images of a TiO2 nanofiber mat produced upon the calcination of PVP/PVP/Ti(OiPr)4 composite fibers at 500 °C (a); a single titania nanofiber (b); a TEM image of the fibers (c); and a SAED pattern displaying the crystal planes of the anatase phase of TiO2 (d).The arrows indicate different crystal planes of TiO2.Reprinted with permission from [15].Copyright (2014) American Chemical Society.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. FEEM micrographs of ZnO nanofibers fabricated by calcining at different temperatures: (a) 450 °C; (b) 650 °C; (c) ZnO nanofibers collected in the form of a free standing mat calcined; and (d) a TEM micrograph of ZnO nanofibers and the selected area electron diffraction patterns (SAED) (inset).The arrows indicate different crystal planes of ZnO.Reprinted from [14].Copyright (2013), with permission from Elsevier.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. FEEM micrographs of ZnO nanofibers fabricated by calcining at different temperatures: (a) 450 • C; (b) 650 • C; (c) ZnO nanofibers collected in the form of a free standing mat calcined; and (d) a TEM micrograph of ZnO nanofibers and the selected area electron diffraction patterns (SAED) (inset).The arrows indicate different crystal planes of ZnO.Reprinted from [14].Copyright (2013), with permission from Elsevier.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Scheme diagram of the electron transfer mechanism of the metal-metal oxide nanofibers.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Scheme diagram of the electron transfer mechanism of the metal-metal oxide nanofibers.

Inventions 2017, 2 , 9 15 of 29 Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Illustration of charge transfer across the metal oxide-metal oxide nanofiber phase junction and photocatalysis of pollutants.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.Schematic representation of adsorption and photocatalysis of different kinds of pollutants on metal oxide nanofibers.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Illustration of charge transfer across the metal oxide-metal oxide nanofiber phase junction and photocatalysis of pollutants.

Inventions 2017, 2 , 9 15 of 29 Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Illustration of charge transfer across the metal oxide-metal oxide nanofiber phase junction and photocatalysis of pollutants.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.Schematic representation of adsorption and photocatalysis of different kinds of pollutants on metal oxide nanofibers.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.Schematic representation of adsorption and photocatalysis of different kinds of pollutants on metal oxide nanofibers.

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.An illustration explaining bacterial disinfection mechanism by nanofiber photocatalyst under light illumination.

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.An illustration explaining bacterial disinfection mechanism by nanofiber photocatalyst under light illumination.