Botanical Biometrics: Exploring Morphological, Palynological, and DNA Barcoding Variations in White Kwao Krua ( Pueraria candollei Grah. ex Benth. and P. mirifica Airy Shaw & Suvat.)

: White Kwao Krua, a crucial Thai medicinal plant, contains various phytoestrogen substances used to alleviate menopausal symptoms in estrogen-deficient women. It originates from two species, namely Pueraria candollei Wall. ex Benth. and P. mirifica Airy Shaw & Suvat. However, there exists morphological variation, and the taxonomic status between both species is ambiguous, making discrimination challenging. In this study, we aim to clarify and differentiate the morphological characteristics, palynology, and DNA barcoding of both species. The morphological results showed the stipule size is a phenotypic marker for the differentiation of both species during the vegetative stage. The palynological results, however, exhibited similarity. Through an examination of nucleotide sequences and neighbor-joining tree analysis, it was determined that the DNA barcoding of the mat K region has the capability to distinguish between P. candollei and P. mirifica at nucleotide position 702. Specifically, P. candollei manifested a G base, contrasting with the C baseobservedin P.mirifica . Thisstudyconcludesthatstipulesizeandthe mat KgeneinDNAbarcodingserve as a distinctive characteristic for distinguishing between P. candollei and P. mirifica . These methodologies prove valuable for ensuring the accurate identification of white Kwao Krua for horticulturists.


Introduction
White Kwao Krua (various spellings) is an important Thai medicinal plant constrained to a select few deciduous montane woodlands situated in the northern and western regions of Thailand [1,2].The botanical origin of white Kwao Krua comes from two species, namely Pueraria candollei Wall.ex Benth.[3][4][5] and P. mirifica Airy Shaw & Suvat.[6][7][8], according to the world flora online database [9,10].However, both species have been categorized to the variety level of P. candollei: P. candollei var.candollei [11,12] and P. candollei var.mirifica (Airy Shaw & Suvat.)Niyomdham [2,13,14] in much of the literature, respectively.The tuberous root of white Kwao Krua has found extensive utilization within the traditional Thai medicinal system, primarily for the purposes of promoting skin health, improving cognitive function, and rejuvenating properties, particularly among the elderly [15].Nowadays, white Kwao Krua is utilized to alleviate menopausal symptoms experienced by estrogen-deficient women.These symptoms include vasomotor manifestations such as hot flashes and night sweats, reproductive issues like decreased libido and urogenital disorders, as well as psychological aspects, including depression and musculoskeletal discomfort [2].White Kwao Krua contains chromene compounds, such as deoxymiroestrol, miroestrol, and isomiroestrol, exhibiting a distinctive estrogen-like molecular structure, and isoflavonoids, namely genistein, daidzein, and puerarin [3,16].Additionally, it is employed for breast augmentation and esthetic enhancement purposes [17].Consequently, it is distributed through herbal markets, drugstores, and online retail platforms in various forms, including tablets, capsules, cookies, creams, and gels.Its usage is predominantly directed towards mitigating symptoms associated with estrogen deficiency, such as hair loss, wrinkles, and breast sagging [2, 3,15].However, white Kwao Krua faces a critical conservation status due to extensive exploitation because of high demand, limited resources, and soil erosion [3].Consequently, it is extensively cultivated for its utilization in medicinal and dietary supplement applications for domestic and international consumption.Nonetheless, white Kwao Krua encounters challenges related to the quality of its raw materials [4,18].An underlying factor contributing to this issue is the lack of precise identification of the botanical origin [3,4].
In plant populations, variations manifest among species that are spatially separated, encompassing both genotype and phenotype [19].Different environmental conditions generate distinct selection forces to occur in various plant populations of the same species, resulting in genetic and phenotypic divergence between populations [19,20].The large number of varieties within crop plants poses challenges in identifying and characterizing them [21].Numerous plants reported the variation with the horticultural species, such as Bixa orellana L. [22], Cucumis melo L. [23], Solunum lycopersicum L. [24], and S. melongena L. [25].Our preliminary investigation showed the variance of floral size, color, marking, and morphogenetic characteristics of white Kwao Krua (Figure 1).Furthermore, the conspicuous similarity in morphological characteristics between P. candollei and P. mirifica is evident, with precise details remaining elusive.The botanical characteristics and ISSR-Touchdown PCR technique were used to analyze and classify the variation of P. mirifica [26].Moreover, DNA barcoding, a modern advancement in biological identification technique, was employed to identify and analyze the variation of P. candollei and P. mirifica [3,4,18].According to our previous study, there were genetic variations of P. candollei in Internal Transcribed Spacer and trnH-psbA regions; however, the study lacked a connection between genetic traits and morphological features [3].In order to render the morphological diversity characteristics of white Kwao Krua clear and easily identifiable for its botanical origin, which is beneficial to farmers in cultivation, this research aims to clarify the taxonomic status and description using morphological characteristics, palynology, and DNA barcoding between P. candollei and P. mirifica.

Plant Materials Collection
In total, thirty-eight accessions of white Kwao Krua seeds were collected from various locations in Thailand and then planted in open field at Phichit Agricultural Research and Development Center in Phichit, Thailand (Supplementary Table S1).In this study, the white Kwao Krua sample was gathered for comprehensive examination encompassing morphological, palynological, and molecular analyses.Voucher samples for reference were duly deposited in the official herbarium of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University (bearing the Index Herbarium acronym: CMU).Morphological and palynolog-

Plant Materials Collection
In total, thirty-eight accessions of white Kwao Krua seeds were collected from various locations in Thailand and then planted in open field at Phichit Agricultural Research and Development Center in Phichit, Thailand (Supplementary Table S1).In this study, the white Kwao Krua sample was gathered for comprehensive examination encompassing morphological, palynological, and molecular analyses.Voucher samples for reference were duly deposited in the official herbarium of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University (bearing the Index Herbarium acronym: CMU).Morphological and palynological assessments were conducted on fresh stems, leaves, flowers, and fruits.Meanwhile, for DNA barcoding analysis, fresh leaves were meticulously stored in polyethylene bags containing silica gel for subsequent analysis.

Morphological Analyses
Morphological features of vegetative components, including stem and leaves (specifically lamina and stipule), as well as reproductive structures such as inflorescence, flower, and fruits, were meticulously examined.The attributes encompassing size, shape, and color of the white Kwao Krua floral samples were thoroughly investigated and dissected in triplicate using stereo microscopes.Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was employed to conduct a qualitative analysis to elucidate the relationship among white Kwao Krua samples and distinguish between P. candollei and P. mirifica.Various characteristic data, encompassing stipule shape, stipule length (cm), indumentum of young leaves, inflorescence length, flower length (cm), calyx length (cm), calyx tube shape, vexillum blotch patterns, apex vexillum blotch patterns, wing-to-keel ratio, and pod indumentum, were utilized to generate row and column data matrices.The dataset included sample codes as rows and their corresponding characteristic data as columns (Supplementary Table S2).Using the complete method in hierarchical cluster analysis with RStudio version 1.2.5033 software [27], these data were clustered into a dendrogram.

Palynological Analyses
To analyze the morphological characteristics of pollen grains from the white Kwao Krua in the two species, representative samples from P. candollei (D1) and P. mirifica (C4), including some P. candollei samples such as A3, A5, AA7, B3, D4, E3, K4-6, and L were selected for examination.The fresh pollen grains were mounted on an aluminum stub using double-sided adhesive carbon tape and then coated with a layer of gold through sputter-coating.Subsequently, the micromorphological attributes of the pollen grains were observed utilizing a scanning electron microscope (JSM-590LV, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at central science laboratory, Faculty of Sciences, Chiang Mai University.The pollen terminology adopted in this study adheres to that defined by Halbritter et al. [28].

DNA Isolation
The dried leaves of white Kwao Krua were cryogenically pulverized into a fine powder using liquid nitrogen.Total genomic DNA was extracted employing the DNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines, with slight modifications.The extracted DNA was quantified using a NanoDrop One UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

DNA Amplification of Barcoding Regions and Sequencing
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was conducted to amplify four DNA barcode regions, specifically the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS), maturase K gene (matK), ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase gene (rbcL), and trnH-psbA intergenic spacer region.Each reaction mixture comprised approximately 100 ng of genomic DNA, 12.5 µL of KOD One™ PCR Master Mix (TOYOBO Life Science, Osaka, Japan), 0.75 µL of each upstream and downstream primer at 10 pmol/µL concentration, and PCR-grade water to reach a final volume of 25 µL.Detailed information regarding the primers used can be found in Supplementary Table S3.The amplification process involved 40 cycles at 98 • C for 10 s, 52 • C (for matK and rbcL) or 55 • C (for ITS and trnH-psbA) for 5 s, and 68 • C for 3 s.Subsequently, all PCR amplicons underwent electrophoresis on a 1.8% agarose gel and were visualized by staining with RedSafe™ nucleic acid staining solution (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seongnam, Republic of Korea) under UV light radiation utilizing a Gel Doc™ EZ Imager (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).Successful PCR products were subjected to bidirectional sequencing using an ABI PRISM 3730XL sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA).

Bioinformation Analysis
The raw sequence data underwent meticulous manual examination and quality-based trimming.BioEdit Software version 7.2.6 [29] was employed with default parameters to excise primer regions and segments exhibiting low quality.The refined nucleotide sequences were aligned using MUSCLE Software 3.8.31[30] and MEGA software version 11.0.10 [31].Alignment parameters were judiciously selected, encompassing clustering methods such as UPGMB, a minimum diagonal length of 24, a gap open penalty of −400, and a gap extend value of 0. To comprehend and visually represent the relationship among white Kwao Krua samples and the differentiation of its two species, P. candollei and P. mirifica, genetic distances based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertion/deletion in three DNA barcoding regions-namely ITS, matK, and trnH-psbA-among white Kwao Krua samples were calculated.The resulting genetic distance matrix was then subjected to Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) using GenAlEx 6.5 [32,33] to generate a graphical representation.Phylogenetic analysis involving a neighbor-joining tree based on a combination of all DNA barcoding regions was conducted using MEGA software version 11.0.10,employing the K2P model of evolution and executing 10,000 bootstrap replications.Pueraria species were utilized as the outgroup for this analysis.The intraspecific value was assessed using the Kimura-2 parameter (K2P) model of evolution with 10,000 bootstrap replications [34].

Comparison of Morphological Characteristics of Pueraria candollei and P. mirifica
A meticulous morphological analysis of both species of white Kwao Krua, namely P. candollei and P. mirifica, was undertaken.Essential morphological characteristics, as indicated by prior publications, were employed to distinguish between the two species.These characteristics encompassed traits such as hairiness, inflorescence length, flower length, calyx length, and the presence of indumentum on pods (Table 1) [1,35].The distinctiveness between both species was apparent in various features.For instance, the inflorescence length of P. candollei exceeded that of P. mirifica (Table 1; Figure 2a-d).Additionally, the flower and calyx sizes of P. mirifica were relatively smaller compared to P. candollei (Table 1; Figure 2e-h).Furthermore, the pod of P. candollei was glabrous (Figure 2i), whereas P. mirifica exhibited dense pubescence (Figure 2j).In this study, specimens B1, C1, and D1-D3 exhibited consistent features with P. candollei, while C3-C5, AA5, and AA6 demonstrated the morphological characteristics of P. mirifica.Nevertheless, other specimens exhibited ambiguous characteristics, displaying features common to both species.Moreover, various plant structures of P. candollei and P. mirifica were evaluated, as illustrated in Figure 3 for P. candollei and Figure 4 for P. mirifica.A distinct difference in stipule length was observed between the two species; the stipule of P. candollei (0.9-1.8 cm) (Figure 3f) was longer than that of P. mirifica (0.3-0.4 mm) (Figure 4f).Regarding seeds, P. candollei displayed a marble dark red seed coat, with seed dimensions measuring 4.1-4.4× 3.3-3.6mm and an ellipsoid-shaped hilum 1.5 mm in diameter (Figure 3h).Conversely, P. mirifica exhibited a marble pinkish white seed coat, with seed dimensions measuring 4.82-4.9× 3.5-3.6mm and an oval-shaped hilum of 1.0 mm in diameter (Figure 4h).Based on the analysis of morphological characteristics between P. candollei and P. mirifica, we delineated the morphological classification using a narrative description and a dichotomous key for distinguishing between both species.

Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) of Morphological Features of Two Botanical
Origins of White Kwao Krua: P. candollei and P. mirifica In accordance with the morphological features observed in specimens of white Kwao Krua, hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was conducted using RStudio version 1.2.5033 software to elucidate the relationship between white Kwao Krua samples and distinguish between the two species.In addition to the primary morphological characteristics outlined in previous studies [1,35], other features were also examined, such as stipule shape and size, the indumentum of young leaves, calyx tube shape, vexillum blotch patterns on the standard, and the ratio of wing and keel length (Supplementary Table S2).The dendrogram resulting from HCA depicted the division of white Kwao Krua samples into five clusters (Figure 5).Five specimens exhibited discernible morphological traits characteristic of P. candollei (B1, C1, and D1-D3), placing them within cluster 5 with A2, E3, D4, and D5 samples.Conversely, C3-C5, AA5, and AA6 displayed precise morphological characteristics of P. mirifica, positioning them in the clade 2, along with the K4-6 sample.Within clade 1, there were eight specimens of white Kwao Krua, specifically B3-B7, C6, C7, and L. All exhibited distinctive characteristics, including a large flower size (2.4-2.5 cm) with white petals, a stipule size of 0.6 cm, and glabrous pods.While both clade 3 and clade 4 exhibited shared characteristics of both species, specimens in clade 3, namely A4-A7, D6, and D7, had stipule sizes approximately 0.2-0.3cm, resembling those of P. mirifica.In contrast, clade 4, consisting of A1, B2, and AA1-AA4, featured large stipules (0.9-1.8 cm) resembling those of P. candollei.In accordance with the morphological features observed in specimens of white Kwao Krua, hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was conducted using RStudio version 1.2.5033 software to elucidate the relationship between white Kwao Krua samples and distinguish between the two species.In addition to the primary morphological characteristics outlined in previous studies [1,35], other features were also examined, such as stipule shape and size, the indumentum of young leaves, calyx tube shape, vexillum blotch patterns on the standard, and the ratio of wing and keel length (Supplementary Table S2).The dendrogram resulting from HCA depicted the division of white Kwao Krua samples into five clusters (Figure 5).Five specimens exhibited discernible morphological traits characteristic of P. candollei (B1, C1, and D1-D3), placing them within cluster 5 with A2, E3, D4, and D5 samples.Conversely, C3-C5, AA5, and AA6 displayed precise morphological characteristics of P. mirifica, positioning them in the clade 2, along with the K4-6 sample.Within clade 1, there were eight specimens of white Kwao Krua, specifically B3-B7, C6, C7, and L. All exhibited distinctive characteristics, including a large flower size (2.4-2.5 cm) with white petals, a stipule size of 0.6 cm, and glabrous pods.While both clade 3 and clade 4 exhibited shared characteristics of both species, specimens in clade 3, namely A4-A7, D6, and D7, had stipule sizes approximately 0.2-0.3cm, resembling those of P. mirifica.In contrast, clade 4, consisting of A1, B2, and AA1-AA4, featured large stipules (0.9-1.8 cm) resembling those of P. candollei.

Palynological Characters of Pollen Grains of P. candollei and P. mirifica
Palynological analysis was performed to investigate the difference in both species: P. candollei (D1) and P. mirifica (C4).The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of both species are shown in Figure 6.The SEM photographs showed that both species demonstrated similar pollen micro-morphological characteristics.Both species contain tricolporate pollen grains with a spheroidal shape.The surface ornamentation of the pollen grains of all samples is the microreticulate type.

Palynological Characters of Pollen Grains of P. candollei and P. mirifica
Palynological analysis was performed to investigate the difference in both species: P. candollei (D1) and P. mirifica (C4).The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of both species are shown in Figure 6.The SEM photographs showed that both species demonstrated similar pollen micro-morphological characteristics.Both species contain tricolporate pollen grains with a spheroidal shape.The surface ornamentation of the pollen grains of all samples is the microreticulate type.In this study, we successfully amplified and sequenced the DNA from all thirty-eight white Kwao Krua samples across four core DNA barcoding regions, namely the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear genome and three regions from the chloroplast genome: matK, rbcL, and trnH-psbA.All nucleotide sequences were submitted in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database (Supplementary Table S1).

Internal Transcribed Spacer sequencing
The total length of nucleotide sequences within the ITS regions of all white Kwao Krua samples ranged from 683 to 689 base pairs.The nucleotide sequences of the ITS regions (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2)exhibited intraspecific DNA polymorphism among all white Kwao Krua samples (Supplementary Figure S1).Eight base substitutions were identified in the ITS1 region at nucleotide positions 40, 41, 45, 86, 87, 106, 170, and 230.In the ITS2 region, six base substitutions were observed at positions 548, 580, 667-669, and 675.Additionally, we investigated the insertion/deletion of nucleotide bases at two locations: five  In this study, we successfully amplified and sequenced the DNA from all thirtyeight white Kwao Krua samples across four core DNA barcoding regions, namely the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear genome and three regions from the chloroplast genome: matK, rbcL, and trnH-psbA.All nucleotide sequences were submitted in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database (Supplementary Table S1).

Internal Transcribed Spacer sequencing
The total length of nucleotide sequences within the ITS regions of all white Kwao Krua samples ranged from 683 to 689 base pairs.The nucleotide sequences of the ITS regions (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2)exhibited intraspecific DNA polymorphism among all white Kwao Krua samples (Supplementary Figure S1).Eight base substitutions were identified in the ITS1 region at nucleotide positions 40, 41, 45, 86, 87, 106, 170, and 230.In the ITS2 region, six base substitutions were observed at positions 548, 580, 667-669, and 675.Additionally, we investigated the insertion/deletion of nucleotide bases at two locations: five nucleotides at position 62-66 and one nucleotide base at position 106 of the ITS1 region.Upon analyzing the DNA sequencing electropherogram, we detected three locations with overlapping peaks caused by nucleotide insertion.In the DNA sequencing electropherogram of sample L3, an insertion of five nucleotides (CGGGC) was noted at position 76 of the ITS1 region.In ITS2, the insertion of the base TA was identified at position 661 in samples A3-A7, C2, D6, and D7.Moreover, samples AA1-AA4, AA7, B2, D4, and D5 revealed an insertion of the base CTC, resulting in overlapping peaks at nucleotide position 671.The pairwise genetic distance based on the ITS region was calculated to be 0.00249 ± 0.00087.

3.
Ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase gene (rbcL) sequencing Based on the rbcL region, the total length of nucleotide sequences of white Kwao Krua samples was 721 bp (Supplementary Figure S3).The rbcL nucleotide sequences exhibited no intraspecific variation among white Kwao Krua samples, encompassing both of its varieties.The overall mean interspecific distance was calculated to be 0.00000 ± 0.00000.

Discussion
White Kwao Krua was endorsed as a "Thailand herbal champion product" by the Ministry of Public Health, emphasizing its role in the development of herbal products intended for both domestic consumption and export [36].The accurate identification of plant species and the selection of high-quality strains are essential initial steps in cultivating medicinal plants for the development of high-value products.From our preliminary study, we observed a diversity of white Kwao Krua in morphological characteristics indicative of both P. candollei and P. mirifica.However, the morphological characteristics distinguishing P. candollei from P. mirifica, pertaining to the botanical origin of white Kwao Krua, remain unclear.Therefore, the morphological analysis, incorporating palynological and DNA barcoding analyses, was employed.
Being a leguminous plant akin to beans, white Kwao Krua is capable of undergoing cross-pollination, which is likely a contributing factor to the observed high genetic variation among these plants [26].Genetic diversity leads to variations in the morphological expression of plants, yielding distinct characteristics that may contribute to confusion in cultivation or utilization.Therefore, in this study, morphological analysis was used to clarify the variation of white Kwao Krua and distinguish between P. candollei and P. mirifica.Thirty-eight samples of white Kwao Krua were collected from different locations in Thailand.Based on the essential morphological features [1,35], certain samples exhibit characteristics consistent with both P. candollei and P. mirifica, while some specimens display ambiguous features that make differentiation between the two species challenging due to the pronounced plasticity in leaf morphology, which undergoes changes under environmental influences [37,38].Suwanvijitr et al. reported that the leaf size of P. mirifica may be influenced by the climate and humidity of its habitat [38].Therefore, the morphological characters of leaves are not considered in this analysis.Other morphological traits, such as petiole morphology, seed shape, and patterns, were subsequently utilized for

Discussion
White Kwao Krua was endorsed as a "Thailand herbal champion product" by the Ministry of Public Health, emphasizing its role in the development of herbal products intended for both domestic consumption and export [36].The accurate identification of plant species and the selection of high-quality strains are essential initial steps in cultivating medicinal plants for the development of high-value products.From our preliminary study, we observed a diversity of white Kwao Krua in morphological characteristics indicative of both P. candollei and P. mirifica.However, the morphological characteristics distinguishing P. candollei from P. mirifica, pertaining to the botanical origin of white Kwao Krua, remain unclear.Therefore, the morphological analysis, incorporating palynological and DNA barcoding analyses, was employed.
Being a leguminous plant akin to beans, white Kwao Krua is capable of undergoing cross-pollination, which is likely a contributing factor to the observed high genetic variation among these plants [26].Genetic diversity leads to variations in the morphological expression of plants, yielding distinct characteristics that may contribute to confusion in cultivation or utilization.Therefore, in this study, morphological analysis was used to clarify the variation of white Kwao Krua and distinguish between P. candollei and P. mirifica.Thirty-eight samples of white Kwao Krua were collected from different locations in Thailand.Based on the essential morphological features [1,35], certain samples exhibit characteristics consistent with both P. candollei and P. mirifica, while some specimens display ambiguous features that make differentiation between the two species challenging due to the pronounced plasticity in leaf morphology, which undergoes changes under environmental influences [37,38].Suwanvijitr et al. reported that the leaf size of P. mirifica may be influenced by the climate and humidity of its habitat [38].Therefore, the morphological characters of leaves are not considered in this analysis.Other morphological traits, such as petiole morphology, seed shape, and patterns, were subsequently utilized for further morphological analysis.Utilizing the morphological features of white Kwao Krua samples, hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was conducted using RStudio version 1.2.5033 software.The resulting dendrogram from HCA illustrated the segregation of white Kwao Krua samples into five distinct clusters (Figure 5).Although the prior research found that the seven characteristics, encompassing the leaf upper color, leaf blade, hairs at stem parts, hair at pod, overall flower color, size of leaf, and inflorescence length, the UPGMA-generated dendrogram revealed a division within white Kwao Krua samples, classifying them into two groups [26].However, it is noteworthy that this study does not specify the plant type serving as the botanical source of white Kwao Krua.In the present study, a phenotypic characteristic emerged as a distinctive feature between the two plant species.Specifically, the stipule size of P. candollei (clade 5) was observed to be greater in length compared to those of P. mirifica (clade 2).However, three clades shared characteristics between these two species.Regarding stipule size, samples in clades 1 and 3 exhibited small stipule sizes resembling those of P. mirifica, whereas members of clade 4 had larger stipules, correlating with P. candollei.This finding can be employed for species identification on living plants for farmers, horticulturists and plant breeders, either independently or as a complementary method to genetic analyses.
Palynology is the scientific study of palynomorphs, a broad term encompassing all entities present in palynological preparations, such as pollen, spores, cysts, and diatoms [28].Palynomorphological characters were acknowledged as a valuable tool for the identification of species and genera [39] in various applications such as environment [40], forensic [41], and herbal medicine [42].There are many studies that reported pollen micromorphology can be used to discriminate plant species such as Malva neglecta Wallr.and M. parviflora L. (Malvaceae) [43], Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.and Nymphaea lotus L. (Nelumbonaceae) [44], and the spineless Astragalus plants (Fabaceae) [45].In this study, a comparative analysis of palynological morphology between P. candollei and P. mirifica was conducted.The results revealed that both species exhibit tricolporate pollen grains with a spheroidal shape, and the surface ornamentation is of the microreticulate type.This finding indicates that the pollen phenology between these two plant species cannot be differentiated.This observation aligns with previous research suggesting that genetically closely related species cannot be distinguished through palynology.For example, Musschia aurea Dumort.and M. wallastonii Lowe (Campanulaceae) [46], Xanthium strumarium L. and X. brasilicum Vell.(Asteraceae) [47], and Ampelocissus artemisiifolia Planch.and A. indica Planch.(Vitaceae) [48].
DNA barcoding is a methodology employed to identify biological specimens through the utilization of short DNA sequences extracted from either nuclear or organelle genomes, applicable to plants, animals, and microbes [49].The principal barcoding regions encompass brief segments derived from chloroplast and nuclear genomes, ITS, matK, rbcL, and trnH-psbA [49].In addition to utilizing DNA barcodes for species identification, the study of genetic diversity in interspecific and intraspecific plant variation is also conducted, for example, Phellodendron species (Rutaceae) [50], Panax species (Araliaceae) [51], and Pueraria species (Fabaceae) [52].In the analysis of genetic variation in white Kwao Krua, previous studies employed ISSR [26] and RAPD [38] techniques to assess genetic diversity.However, these methods are insufficient for verifying the botanical origin of white Kwao Krua.In this study, an assessment of genetic variation was conducted on 38 white Kwao Krua samples, focusing on DNA barcoding regions, namely ITS, matK, rbcL, and trnH-psbA.The results indicated that, based on pairwise genetic distance, the highest genetic variation was observed in the trnH-psbA region, followed by ITS and matK.However, no genetic variation was observed in the rbcL region.According to Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) constructed by using a combination of all DNA barcoding regions, it was observed that the white Kwao Krua samples were categorized into more than two groups, consistent with findings from the previous studies employing ISSR [26] and RAPD [38] techniques.However, the PCoA result could discriminate P. mirifica from P. candollei.Focusing on the correlation between DNA barcoding and stipule size, the P. mirifica group exhibits small stipules, whereas the P. candollei group displays larger stipules (Figure 7).Additionally, the small group of B3-B7, C6, and C7 shows the different flower and stipule sizes in the range between P. mirifica and P. candollei.Based on the NJ tree, each DNA barcoding region (Figure 8) and the integration of all loci (Figure 9) were reconstructed.From four DNA barcoding regions, matK and trnH-psbA regions could separate P. mirifica from P. candollei.The analysis of the nucleotide sequence in the matK gene locus unveiled a singular polymorphic site at the aligned nucleotide position 702, indicating the presence of the base G for P. candollei or C for P. mirifica, enabling the differentiation of the two plant species.The nucleotide position 702 serves as a distinctive nucleotide signature that separates the two species.This finding aligns with the research conducted by Wiriyakarun et al. [4].In case of trnH-psbA, there were many polymorphic sites but the NJ tree was differentiable white Kwao Krua sample to two species.However, the samples of B3-B7, C6, and C7 were placed in P. mirifica clade for matK gene, while they were positioned in P. candollei clade for trnH-psbA gene.Considering the morphological characters, it was observed that they predominantly exhibited typical of P. mirifica.Consequently, based on the results, they should be identified as P. mirifica.This suggests that differentiating between plant species that are the botanical source of white Kwao Krua can be achieved by the nucleotide base sequence at the matK region.This information can be leveraged to develop a more rapid, accurate, and convenient differentiation method, such as Bar-HRM, LAMP, immunochromatographic assays, or DNA chromatographic detection strips, which can play a pivotal role in advancing applications related to horticulture.

Conclusions
The botanical origin of white Kwao Krua is attributed to Pueraria candollei and P. mirifica; nevertheless, both the taxonomic status and description remain ambiguous.Both species can be easily distinguished based on morphological characteristics during flowering and fruiting; however, these stages are relatively short.Therefore, during the vegetative stage, the distinction is made by observing differences in the size of the stipule.In terms of palynology, the pollen micromorphology of both species is identical.However, nucleotide sequencing analysis of three DNA barcoding regions, namely ITS, matK, and trnH-psbA, showed genetic variation among white Kwao Krua samples.Only the matK gene, as revealed by nucleotide sequencing and neighbor-joining tree analysis, allows for the differentiation between the two species.Therefore, the development of future tools characterized by simplicity, speed, and accuracy, such as Bar-HRM, LAMP, immunochromatographic assays, or DNA chromatographic detection strips, aims to distinguish between these two species.This discovery provides valuable information for accurate identification methods applicable to farmers, horticulturists, and plant breeders.For future research, an analysis of the chemical constituents and metabolomic profile of both species of white Kwao Krua will be undertaken to select high-quality variants for the production of high-value herbal products in the pharmaceutical industry.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Hierarchical cluster analysis based on morphological characters depicting the relationship of white Kwao Krua samples (P.candollei and P. mirifica).

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Hierarchical cluster analysis based on morphological characters depicting the relationship of white Kwao Krua samples (P.candollei and P. mirifica).

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Phylogenetic trees illustrating the relationships among white Kwao Krua samples, reconstructed using the neighbor-joining method with MEGA software version 11.0.10.Trees are based on a combined analysis of all DNA barcoding regions.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Phylogenetic trees illustrating the relationships among white Kwao Krua samples, reconstructed using the neighbor-joining method with MEGA software version 11.0.10.Trees are based on a combined analysis of all DNA barcoding regions.

:
Alignment of ITS barcode region of white Kwao Krua samples; Figure S2: Alignment of matK barcode region of white Kwao Krua samples; Figure S3: Alignment of rbcL barcode region of white Kwao Krua samples; Figure S4: Alignment of trnH-psbA barcode region of white Kwao Krua samples; Table

Table 1 .
Key morphological features of Pueraria candollei and P. mirifica based on our study and the published data.

Table 1 .
Key morphological features of Pueraria candollei and P. mirifica based on our study and the published data.