Next Article in Journal
Modeling of Sedimentation and Creaming in Suspensions and Pickering Emulsions
Previous Article in Journal
Study of Leading-Edge Dimple Effects on Airfoil Flow Using Tomographic PIV and Temperature Sensitive Paint
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Solution Algorithms for LES of Turbulent Flows Using OpenFOAM
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for Special Issue “Multiscale Turbulent Transport”

by
Marco Martins Afonso
* and
Sílvio M. A. Gama
Centro de Matemática (Faculdade de Ciências) da Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fluids 2019, 4(4), 185; https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids4040185
Submission received: 11 October 2019 / Accepted: 14 October 2019 / Published: 18 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multiscale Turbulent Transport)
Turbulent transport is currently a great subject of ongoing investigation at the interface of methodologies running from theory to numerical simulations and experiments, and covering several spatio-temporal scales. Mathematical analysis, physical modelling and engineering applications represent different facets of a classical, long-standing problem still far from achieving a thorough comprehension. The goal of this Special Issue was to offer recent advances covering subjects such as multiscale analysis in turbulent transport processes, Lagrangian and Eulerian descriptions of turbulence, advection of particles and fields in turbulent flows, ideal or non-ideal turbulence (unstationary/inhomogeneous/anisotropic/compressible), turbulent flows in bio-fluid mechanics and magnetohydrodynamics, control and optimization of turbulent transport. The Special Issue was open to regular articles, review papers focused on the state-of-the-art and the progress made over the last few years, as well as new research trends.
Yamanaka et al. (2018) [1] focused on weak defect turbulence in the electroconvection of nematic liquid crystals, from the experimental point of view. Increasing the coarse-graining time, the authors showed that the type of diffusion changes from superdiffusion first to subdiffusion and then to the standard diffusive behaviour, a result reflecting the coexistence of local order and global disorder in the analysis of convective rolls.
Martins Afonso et al. (2019) [2], in the background of linear-stability analysis, passive optimal control and structural sensitivity, investigated the incompressible fluid flow past a backward-slanted step inclined at 25 degrees, which represents a portion of the well-known Ahmed’s body mimicking a simplified ground-vehicle geometry of the bluff-body type (such as the rear window of a car). Since this section is responsible for the majority of the aerodynamic drag—due to the unfavourable pressure gradient caused by the recirculation bubble before the reattachment—they studied how to reduce or delay the flow separation, exploiting adjoint-state method, variational formalism, penalization scheme, orthogonalization algorithm and functional derivatives.
Locke et al. (2019) [3] theoretically discussed the B-model for turbulence intermittency, first by pointing out a couple of mistakes in the original derivation and analyzing the corrected results in terms of a set of coefficients, and then by generalizing it and comparing such an extension with experimental findings from a unidirectional oval flume and with other discrete/continuous breakage/cascade models.
Rahman and San (2019) [4] concentrated their attention on the performance of a relaxation filtering approach for Euler turbulence using a central seven-point stencil reconstruction scheme. Two-dimensional inviscid Rayleigh–Taylor instability provided the benchmark for the assessment of high-resolution numerical simulations, for both the time evolution of the flow field and its spectral resolution up to three decades of inertial range.
Araya (2019) [5] explored the performance of several turbulence models for the Reynolds-Averaged Numerical Simulation of steady compressible turbulent flows on complex geometries and unstructured grids. Validation against high-resolution Direct Numerical Simulations and previous experimental data was followed by an application to a few aerodynamic profiles, the main discriminant for the accuracy being the attached or separated character of the velocity field.
Lees and Aluie (2019) [6] underlined the role of baroclinicity (misalignment of pressure and density gradients) in the kinetic-energy budget, by means of coarse graining and scale decomposition. The role of baropycnal work was stressed by successfully comparing an analytical model developed here with on-purpose numerical simulations of compressible turbulence, highlighting the importance of this contributions in the generation of vorticity and strain as well.
Gama et al. (2019) [7] dealt with Padé approximations of the magnetohydrodynamic kinematic dynamo α -effect and of the eddy-viscosity or diffusivity tensors in different flows, employing expressions derived in the framework of the multiple-scale formalism. They performed computations in Fortran in the standard “double” (real*8) and extended “quadruple” (real*16) precision, as well as symbolic calculations in Mathematica.
Bhowmick and Iovieno (2019) [8] simulated the transient evolution of a turbulent cloud top interface, using a pseudo-spectral Direct Numerical Simulation along with Lagrangian droplet equations including collision and coalescence. Clear-air entrainment/detrainment and turbulent mixing are known to affect the droplet spectrum through supersaturation fluctuations, and the effects of collisions—driven by gravitational sedimentation—and condensation/evaporation on the radius distribution were estimated.
López Castaño et al. (2019) [9] tested two algorithms for the temporal integration of the Navier—Stokes equations in the Boussinesq approximation for turbulent flows, within the Large-Eddy Simulation methodology and the OpenFOAM implementation with hexahedral meshes. They proved the validity of an anisotropic filter function, and demonstrated the superiority of a specific method via studies of a wall-bounded channel flow and of Rayleigh—Bénard convection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yamanaka, K.; Narumi, T.; Hashiguchi, M.; Okabe, H.; Hara, K.; Hidaka, Y. Time-Dependent Diffusion Coefficients for Chaotic Advection due to Fluctuations of Convective Rolls. Fluids 2018, 3, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Martins Afonso, M.; Meliga, P.; Serre, E. Optimal Transient Growth in an Incompressible Flow past a Backward-Slanted Step. Fluids 2019, 4, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Locke, C.; Seuront, L.; Yamazaki, H. A Correction and Discussion on Log-Normal Intermittency B-Model. Fluids 2019, 4, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rahman, S.M.; San, O. A Relaxation Filtering Approach for Two-Dimensional Rayleigh–Taylor Instability-Induced Flows. Fluids 2019, 4, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Araya, G. Turbulence Model Assessment in Compressible Flows around Complex Geometries with Unstructured Grids. Fluids 2019, 4, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lees, A.; Aluie, H. Baropycnal Work: A Mechanism for Energy Transfer across Scales. Fluids 2019, 4, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gama, S.M.A.; Chertovskih, R.; Zheligovsky, V. Computation of Kinematic and Magnetic α-Effect and Eddy Diffusivity Tensors by Padé Approximation. Fluids 2019, 4, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bhowmick, T.; Iovieno, M. Direct Numerical Simulation of a Warm Cloud Top Model Interface: Impact of the Transient Mixing on Different Droplet Population. Fluids 2019, 4, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. López Castaño, S.; Petronio, A.; Petris, G.; Armenio, V. Assessment of Solution Algorithms for LES of Turbulent Flows Using OpenFOAM. Fluids 2019, 4, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martins Afonso, M.; Gama, S.M.A. Editorial for Special Issue “Multiscale Turbulent Transport”. Fluids 2019, 4, 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids4040185

AMA Style

Martins Afonso M, Gama SMA. Editorial for Special Issue “Multiscale Turbulent Transport”. Fluids. 2019; 4(4):185. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids4040185

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martins Afonso, Marco, and Sílvio M. A. Gama. 2019. "Editorial for Special Issue “Multiscale Turbulent Transport”" Fluids 4, no. 4: 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids4040185

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop