Temporary Anti-Corrosive Double Layer on Zinc Substrate Based on Chitosan Hydrogel and Epoxy Resin

In practice, metal structures are frequently transported or stored before being used. Even in such circumstances, the corrosion process caused by environmental factors (moisture, salty air, etc.) can occur quite easily. To avoid this, metal surfaces can be protected with temporary coatings. The objective of this research was to develop coatings that exhibit effective protective characteristics while also allowing for easy removal, if required. Novel, chitosan/epoxy double layers were prepared on zinc by dip-coating to obtain temporary tailor-made and peelable-on-demand, anti-corrosive coatings. Chitosan hydrogel fulfills the role of a primer that acts as an intermediary between the zinc substrate and the epoxy film to obtain better adhesion and specialization. The resulting coatings were characterized using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, contact angle measurements, Raman spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The impedance of the bare zinc was increased by three orders of magnitude when the protective coatings were applied, proving efficient anti-corrosive protection. The chitosan sublayer improved the adhesion of the protective epoxy coating. The structural integrity and absolute impedance of the protective layers were conserved in both basic and neutral environments. However, after fulfilling its lifespan, the chitosan/epoxy double-layered coating could be removed after treatment with a mild acid without damaging the substrate. This was because of the hydrophilic properties of the epoxy layer, as well as the tendency of chitosan to swell in acidic conditions.


Introduction
Corrosion, defined as the oxidation of a metal due to exposure to an aggressive environmental medium such as salt water, moisture, acidic rain, or UV light, is an ancient problem. Unfortunately, this phenomenon occurs even when the duration of the exposure is short (a few days, weeks, or months), as is the case in the shipping or storage of metallic objects. Painting provides a permanent and unremovable coating with good anti-corrosive properties; however, in the case of metallic parts or equipment that require further assembly, a removable protective layer is more desirable during shipping and storage. Therefore, temporary coatings that can be removed from the surface without damaging the substrate gained importance. Their temporary nature refers to a well-defined service period after which the surface can be liberated by stripping away the coating in specific conditions. Such coatings are used for several applications, including protection from corrosion and mechanical damage, optics, food packaging, antimicrobial applications, cosmetics, and others [1]. Temporary treatment can be used on several substrates, such as ceramics, glass, Gels 2023, 9, 361 2 of 15 plastics, and foodstuff; however, metallic surfaces remain one of the most important, and our interest is mainly focused on the anti-corrosion use of such peelable coatings.
It is worth mentioning that, nowadays, there is an increasing interest in multiple functionalities of surface coverings (e.g., flame-and fire-retardant, antimicrobial, self-healing, self-cleaning, and anti-fouling coatings) [2]. Previous studies have been conducted regarding "peelable coatings" with some notable USA patents granted in the 20th century to solve such corrosion problems using a mixture of silicone and titanium dioxide [3] and a mixture of polyvinyl esters, polyacrylates, and polymethacrylates [4]. Furthermore, in the recent literature, a review regarding the peelable coatings [1] summarized the main fields of application and the used materials. In the aforementioned paper, the materials used for anti-corrosion coatings were mainly vinyl polymers and aromatic corrosion inhibitors. The development of mono-and bilayer temporary coatings [5] based on waterborne polyurethane resin applied on stainless steel plates by spray coating has also been reported. Self-assembled layers of phosphates/silanes/thiols were applied as temporary protective films on magnesium alloys [6]. Modifying the adhesion of the first layer in a double-layered system can also lead to the production of a peelable coating [7].
Epoxy-based coatings (EPs) are widely used for the anti-corrosive protection of different metals due to their superior protective properties and ease of application/modification with additives [8]. They also possess characteristics such as outstanding processability, excellent chemical resistance, good insulating properties, and good compatibility with heterogeneous materials in modified coatings. These include materials such as SiO 2 , Zn, Fe 2 O 3 , and halloysite [9], as well as TiO 2 [10]. EP coatings are relatively hydrophilic because in their cured networks they contain hydroxyl groups, which lead to poor resistance in humid conditions [11]. As such, they can channel aqueous solutions to an underlying layer or substrate.
Chitosan (Chit) is a polysaccharide widely used and studied for several applications in medicine [12] (development of antibacterial agents and wound healing [13]), agriculture, packaging, electroanalysis, the temporary anti-corrosive protection of zinc [14], the protection of biocompatible magnesium alloys [15], and the treatment of heavy-metal ions [16]. This wide array of applications is possible due to its eco-friendly nature, simple production process, and antimicrobial properties. Chitosan hydrogels, beside the fact that they can be easily obtained, are biocompatible and present bacteria-repelling ability. Due to its loose structure, a coating suitable for controlled release of the active ingredient can be made from it [17].
Native chitosan coatings only have modest anti-corrosive properties, which can be improved by using additives or copolymerization. Chit has very good adhesion on Zn, with peeling effects only appearing after excessive crosslinking. It should be noted that, in neutral and basic conditions, chitosan shows only modest swelling due to water intake. In strong acidic environments, as the amine groups of the polymer molecule get protonated, the swelling of the chitosan should be more pronounced, eventually leading to full dissolution if the environment is sufficiently acidic. This should lead to a loss of adhesion toward the substrate. Previous studies show that Chit coatings are removable without damaging the underlying metal [18].
There is a rich scientific literature regarding the investigation of chitosan-and epoxybased coatings; however, these are hybrid systems or composites. For instance, it was observed that the addition of chitosan decreased the tensile strength [19], increased the flexibility [20], improved the hardness of an epoxy composite [21], enhanced the anticorrosion property of epoxy coatings [22], and increased the water absorption of the epoxy-based composite [23]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no published data for using them as superposed monolayers formed with dip-coating and specialized for temporary protection during the transport of metals that require further processing or assembly.
In this context, the purpose of this research is to produce a novel, peelable coating that offers protection during transport in marine environments (where the main source of Gels 2023, 9, 361 3 of 15 corrosion is exposure to NaCl) but can be removed selectively after fulfilling its purpose. To achieve this objective, the studies were carried out in a model solution of 3 w/w% NaCl. Bisphenol A epoxy resins and chitosan can potentially interact (due to the presence of amino and hydroxy groups on the surface of the components), resulting in coatings with higher stability. In addition, the epoxy layer could potentially channel small amounts of an acidic environment to the chitosan primer layer, which would lose its adhesion to the zinc due to swelling. The greater stability of the chitosan layer in neutral or basic environments, meanwhile, would result in retained adhesion in these conditions. As such, in this work, chitosan/epoxy double layers were produced on zinc substrates in an attempt to prepare a transparent, temporary anti-corrosive coating with increased protective properties in aggressive conditions, such as a marine environment. As the adhesion of the chitosan sublayer to the zinc surface can be influenced by acids, these coatings should be removable on demand after exposure to such an environment, without damaging the underlying substrate [5].

Coating Thickness and Adhesion Measurements
The determined thickness of the epoxy monolayers on the zinc substrates was~25 µm, which is one order of magnitude above the irregularities present on the zinc substrate and points to a complete surface coverage, as proven in our previous studies regarding chitosan- [18] and SiO 2 -based [24] coatings on zinc. The chitosan/epoxy double layers had a thickness of~43 µm. This suggests an increased thickness of the epoxy component of the bilayer, as the thickness of the chitosan sublayer, was only around 8 µm. It was reported [25] that coatings prepared from the same material, even when they are applied with the same technique but on different surfaces (e.g., Zn or Zn/Chit), present different properties. The coatings' changed structure and surface polarity can be caused by interaction with the substrates. Considering the two structures, there are free amino and hydroxyl groups that can be involved in two types of hydrogen bonds: one, intramolecular for the formation of layers of different thicknesses, and the second, intermolecular that leads to the formation of the multilayered structure, especially between chitosan and the epoxy polymer [26,27].
Analyzing the data obtained from the thickness measurements, an increase of thickness can be observed from approximately 33 µm to 43 µm in the case of chitosan deposition followed by the epoxy polymer. The increase in thickness could be explained by the spatial arrangement of the epoxy polymer monolayers, which can be perpendicular to the chitosan surface due to the formation of intermolecular hydrogen bonds, see Figure 1. In this arrangement, the number of hydrogen bonds increases between the two layers resulting in a greater cohesive force, which can be seen in the exfoliation process, when the two layers are removed together.
Raman bands corresponding to the epoxide vibrations in the range of 1230 cm −1 to 1280 cm −1 were present in the epoxy coating samples, but their intensity is low. This is likely due to the curing reaction involving epoxide ring opening. The Raman peaks observed at around 1100-1200 cm −1 and 1608 cm −1 are attributed to resin backbone vibrations [28].
In the case of chitosan-coated zinc, no clear peaks were visible where the epoxy shows its characteristic peaks, due to the overlap of multiple peaks attributed to C-H and C-O-C bonds. Moreover, it was reported that, when the chitosan is diluted (as in the case of the aqueous Chit solution used in our case to achieve a thin layer), no separate peaks could be identified in the Raman spectra [29].
The Raman spectra ( Figure 2) recorded to put in evidence the possible interactions between the two organic layers showed no significant change in peak position, size, or ratio when a chitosan sublayer was present on the zinc substrate under the protective epoxy film. This points to relatively weak interactions between the two layers and a probable lack of covalent bonding. Nevertheless, the affinity between the two organic compounds is sufficiently strong to explain the good mechanic properties of the Chit/EP coating, which is in good accordance with the results obtained for layer thicknesses.   Raman bands corresponding to the epoxide vibrations in the range of 1230 cm −1 to 1280 cm −1 were present in the epoxy coating samples, but their intensity is low. This is likely due to the curing reaction involving epoxide ring opening. The Raman peaks observed at around 1100-1200 cm −1 and 1608 cm −1 are attributed to resin backbone vibrations [28].
In the case of chitosan-coated zinc, no clear peaks were visible where the epoxy shows its characteristic peaks, due to the overlap of multiple peaks attributed to C-H and C-O-C bonds. Moreover, it was reported that, when the chitosan is diluted (as in the case of the aqueous Chit solution used in our case to achieve a thin layer), no separate peaks could be identified in the Raman spectra [29].
The Raman spectra ( Figure 2) recorded to put in evidence the possible interactions between the two organic layers showed no significant change in peak position, size, or ratio when a chitosan sublayer was present on the zinc substrate under the protective epoxy film. This points to relatively weak interactions between the two layers and a probable lack of covalent bonding. Nevertheless, the affinity between the two organic compounds is sufficiently strong to explain the good mechanic properties of the Chit/EP coating, which is in good accordance with the results obtained for layer thicknesses. Further, adhesion measurements were carried out in different corrosive media. In a temporary coating, ease of stripping is essential; however, the coating film should not peel off in the studied corrosive media (NaCl in our case), leading to failure during its lifecycle. The acid resistance, alkali resistance, and corrosion resistance of the coating can be evaluated to test its ability to withstand external chemical attack [1].
Strong wet adhesion inhibits the delamination of the coating during oxygen reduction and hinders the diffusion of the corrosive media at the coating/metal interface [30]. In our case, when the coated samples were soaked in neutral or basic solutions, subsequent visual inspection showed transparent coatings with retained structural integrity. For Chit/EP double layers, adhesion was retained in both NaCl and NaOH solutions, as the layer could not be manually peeled off; however, in the case of the sample soaked in an HCl solution, the coating could be peeled off without damaging the underlying substrate ( Figure 3). This can be explained by the epoxy layer channeling the acidic electrolyte toward the chitosan sublayer, causing its swelling and reduced adhesion toward the zinc surface, thus making possible a selective peel-off of the coating. For removable coatings, it is of great importance that the adhesion to the substrate is controlled. the layer could not be manually peeled off; however, in the case of the sample soa an HCl solution, the coating could be peeled off without damaging the underlyin strate ( Figure 3). This can be explained by the epoxy layer channeling the acidic elec toward the chitosan sublayer, causing its swelling and reduced adhesion toward t surface, thus making possible a selective peel-off of the coating. For removable co it is of great importance that the adhesion to the substrate is controlled. The quantitative adhesion test (Table 1) shows that, in dry conditions, the ad of the EP and Chit/EP coatings was similar (~55 and 57%, respectively). Meanwh chitosan showed very good adhesion to the zinc surface with basically no remova 2 h of immersion in a NaCl solution, the adhesion of the EP coating in wet con dropped to ~27%, while the Chit/EP coating showed only a modest decrease in ad from 57% to 51%, showing superior behavior after short-term exposure. Moreove after exposure, the EP coating was basically completely removed, while some Chit/EP coatings still remained on the surface. These results point to increased ad to the zinc substrate when the chitosan sublayer is applied, both in dry conditio after exposure to a NaCl-containing environment. The adhesive force is essential durability of the coating, whereas the cohesive force is essential for easy removal. The quantitative adhesion test (Table 1) shows that, in dry conditions, the adhesion of the EP and Chit/EP coatings was similar (~55 and 57%, respectively). Meanwhile, the chitosan showed very good adhesion to the zinc surface with basically no removal. After 2 h of immersion in a NaCl solution, the adhesion of the EP coating in wet conditions dropped to~27%, while the Chit/EP coating showed only a modest decrease in adhesion from 57% to 51%, showing superior behavior after short-term exposure. Moreover, 24 h after exposure, the EP coating was basically completely removed, while some of the Chit/EP coatings still remained on the surface. These results point to increased adhesion to the zinc substrate when the chitosan sublayer is applied, both in dry conditions and after exposure to a NaCl-containing environment. The adhesive force is essential for the durability of the coating, whereas the cohesive force is essential for easy removal.

Contact Angle and Scanning Electron Microscopy Measurements
To test the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the various surfaces, contact angle measurements were carried out. Compared to other coated systems, a lower initial contact angle was registered in the case of the epoxy layer (71 • ), underlining its hydrophilic properties ( Figure 4). It should be mentioned that the literature shows that the water contact angles measured for epoxy coatings demonstrate very close values [11], pointing to a similar behavior of the coating in different aqueous solutions regardless of the presence of electrolytes. Native chitosan showed a 79 • contact angle, which is slightly lower than water contact angles recorded in the literature [31], probably due to the presence of a significant amount of NaCl in the droplet, as high amounts of electrolyte can flow into the chitosan and tend to reduce the contact angle [18]. When chitosan was deposited under the epoxy layer on zinc, this value increased to 77 • , suggesting improved structural stability and reduced water intake of the external epoxy layer. The situation of the "sandwich-like coating" differs from that reported for epoxy/chitosan composite coatings, where the incorporation of chitosan in the epoxy matrix resulted in higher hydrophilicity of the material [12]. After the coating was peeled off, the contact angle dropped to 69 • , as the zinc substrate may have been covered with some chitosan residue and, possibly, oxidation products, but the quality of the substrate was not significantly affected.

Contact Angle and Scanning Electron Microscopy Measurements
To test the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the various surfaces, contact angle measurements were carried out. Compared to other coated systems, a lower initial contact angle was registered in the case of the epoxy layer (71°), underlining its hydrophilic properties ( Figure 4). It should be mentioned that the literature shows that the water contact angles measured for epoxy coatings demonstrate very close values [11], pointing to a similar behavior of the coating in different aqueous solutions regardless of the presence of electrolytes. Native chitosan showed a 79° contact angle, which is slightly lower than water contact angles recorded in the literature [31], probably due to the presence of a significant amount of NaCl in the droplet, as high amounts of electrolyte can flow into the chitosan and tend to reduce the contact angle [18]. When chitosan was deposited under the epoxy layer on zinc, this value increased to 77°, suggesting improved structural stability and reduced water intake of the external epoxy layer. The situation of the "sandwich-like coating" differs from that reported for epoxy/chitosan composite coatings, where the incorporation of chitosan in the epoxy matrix resulted in higher hydrophilicity of the material [12]. After the coating was peeled off, the contact angle dropped to 69°, as the zinc

Contact Angle and Scanning Electron Microscopy Measurements
To test the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the various surfaces, contact angle measurements were carried out. Compared to other coated systems, a lower initial contact angle was registered in the case of the epoxy layer (71°), underlining its hydrophilic properties ( Figure 4). It should be mentioned that the literature shows that the water contact angles measured for epoxy coatings demonstrate very close values [11], pointing to a similar behavior of the coating in different aqueous solutions regardless of the presence of electrolytes. Native chitosan showed a 79° contact angle, which is slightly lower than water contact angles recorded in the literature [31], probably due to the presence of a significant amount of NaCl in the droplet, as high amounts of electrolyte can flow into the chitosan and tend to reduce the contact angle [18]. When chitosan was deposited under the epoxy layer on zinc, this value increased to 77°, suggesting improved structural stability and reduced water intake of the external epoxy layer. The situation of the "sandwich-like coating" differs from that reported for epoxy/chitosan composite coatings, where the incorporation of chitosan in the epoxy matrix resulted in higher hydrophilicity of the material [12]. After the coating was peeled off, the contact angle dropped to 69°, as the zinc

Contact Angle and Scanning Electron Microscopy Measurements
To test the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the various surfaces, contact angle measurements were carried out. Compared to other coated systems, a lower initial contact angle was registered in the case of the epoxy layer (71°), underlining its hydrophilic properties ( Figure 4). It should be mentioned that the literature shows that the water contact angles measured for epoxy coatings demonstrate very close values [11], pointing to a similar behavior of the coating in different aqueous solutions regardless of the presence of electrolytes. Native chitosan showed a 79° contact angle, which is slightly lower than water contact angles recorded in the literature [31], probably due to the presence of a significant amount of NaCl in the droplet, as high amounts of electrolyte can flow into the chitosan and tend to reduce the contact angle [18]. When chitosan was deposited under the epoxy layer on zinc, this value increased to 77°, suggesting improved structural stability and reduced water intake of the external epoxy layer. The situation of the "sandwich-like coating" differs from that reported for epoxy/chitosan composite coatings, where the incorporation of chitosan in the epoxy matrix resulted in higher hydrophilicity of the material [12]. After the coating was peeled off, the contact angle dropped to 69°, as the zinc

Contact Angle and Scanning Electron Microscopy Measurements
To test the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the various surfaces, contact angle measurements were carried out. Compared to other coated systems, a lower initial contact angle was registered in the case of the epoxy layer (71°), underlining its hydrophilic properties ( Figure 4). It should be mentioned that the literature shows that the water contact angles measured for epoxy coatings demonstrate very close values [11], pointing to a similar behavior of the coating in different aqueous solutions regardless of the presence of electrolytes. Native chitosan showed a 79° contact angle, which is slightly lower than water contact angles recorded in the literature [31], probably due to the presence of a significant amount of NaCl in the droplet, as high amounts of electrolyte can flow into the chitosan and tend to reduce the contact angle [18]. When chitosan was deposited under the epoxy layer on zinc, this value increased to 77°, suggesting improved structural stability and reduced water intake of the external epoxy layer. The situation of the "sandwich-like coating" differs from that reported for epoxy/chitosan composite coatings, where the incorporation of chitosan in the epoxy matrix resulted in higher hydrophilicity of the material [12]. After the coating was peeled off, the contact angle dropped to 69°, as the zinc

Contact Angle and Scanning Electron Microscopy Measurements
To test the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the various surfaces, contact angle measurements were carried out. Compared to other coated systems, a lower initial contact angle was registered in the case of the epoxy layer (71°), underlining its hydrophilic properties ( Figure 4). It should be mentioned that the literature shows that the water contact angles measured for epoxy coatings demonstrate very close values [11], pointing to a similar behavior of the coating in different aqueous solutions regardless of the presence of electrolytes. Native chitosan showed a 79° contact angle, which is slightly lower than water contact angles recorded in the literature [31], probably due to the presence of a significant amount of NaCl in the droplet, as high amounts of electrolyte can flow into the chitosan and tend to reduce the contact angle [18]. When chitosan was deposited under the epoxy layer on zinc, this value increased to 77°, suggesting improved structural stability and reduced water intake of the external epoxy layer. The situation of the "sandwich-like coating" differs from that reported for epoxy/chitosan composite coatings, where the incorporation of chitosan in the epoxy matrix resulted in higher hydrophilicity of the material [12]. After the coating was peeled off, the contact angle dropped to 69°, as the zinc

Contact Angle and Scanning Electron Microscopy Measurements
To test the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the various surfaces, contact angle measurements were carried out. Compared to other coated systems, a lower initial contact angle was registered in the case of the epoxy layer (71°), underlining its hydrophilic properties ( Figure 4). It should be mentioned that the literature shows that the water contact angles measured for epoxy coatings demonstrate very close values [11], pointing to a similar behavior of the coating in different aqueous solutions regardless of the presence of electrolytes. Native chitosan showed a 79° contact angle, which is slightly lower than water contact angles recorded in the literature [31], probably due to the presence of a significant amount of NaCl in the droplet, as high amounts of electrolyte can flow into the chitosan and tend to reduce the contact angle [18]. When chitosan was deposited under the epoxy layer on zinc, this value increased to 77°, suggesting improved structural stability and reduced water intake of the external epoxy layer. The situation of the "sandwich-like coating" differs from that reported for epoxy/chitosan composite coatings, where the incorporation of chitosan in the epoxy matrix resulted in higher hydrophilicity of the material [12]. After the coating was peeled off, the contact angle dropped to 69°, as the zinc

Contact Angle and Scanning Electron Microscopy Measurements
To test the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the various surfaces, contact angle measurements were carried out. Compared to other coated systems, a lower initial contact angle was registered in the case of the epoxy layer (71°), underlining its hydrophilic properties ( Figure 4). It should be mentioned that the literature shows that the water contact angles measured for epoxy coatings demonstrate very close values [11], pointing to a similar behavior of the coating in different aqueous solutions regardless of the presence of electrolytes. Native chitosan showed a 79° contact angle, which is slightly lower than water contact angles recorded in the literature [31], probably due to the presence of a significant amount of NaCl in the droplet, as high amounts of electrolyte can flow into the chitosan and tend to reduce the contact angle [18]. When chitosan was deposited under the epoxy layer on zinc, this value increased to 77°, suggesting improved structural stability and reduced water intake of the external epoxy layer. The situation of the "sandwich-like coating" differs from that reported for epoxy/chitosan composite coatings, where the incorporation of chitosan in the epoxy matrix resulted in higher hydrophilicity of the material [12]. After the coating was peeled off, the contact angle dropped to 69°, as the zinc

Contact Angle and Scanning Electron Microscopy Measurements
To test the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the various surfaces, contact angle measurements were carried out. Compared to other coated systems, a lower initial contact angle was registered in the case of the epoxy layer (71°), underlining its hydrophilic properties ( Figure 4). It should be mentioned that the literature shows that the water contact angles measured for epoxy coatings demonstrate very close values [11], pointing to a similar behavior of the coating in different aqueous solutions regardless of the presence of electrolytes. Native chitosan showed a 79° contact angle, which is slightly lower than water contact angles recorded in the literature [31], probably due to the presence of a significant amount of NaCl in the droplet, as high amounts of electrolyte can flow into the chitosan and tend to reduce the contact angle [18]. When chitosan was deposited under the epoxy layer on zinc, this value increased to 77°, suggesting improved structural stability and reduced water intake of the external epoxy layer. The situation of the "sandwich-like coating" differs from that reported for epoxy/chitosan composite coatings, where the incorporation of chitosan in the epoxy matrix resulted in higher hydrophilicity of the material [12]. After the coating was peeled off, the contact angle dropped to 69°, as the zinc

Contact Angle and Scanning Electron Microscopy Measurements
To test the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the various surfaces, contact angle measurements were carried out. Compared to other coated systems, a lower initial contact angle was registered in the case of the epoxy layer (71°), underlining its hydrophilic properties ( Figure 4). It should be mentioned that the literature shows that the water contact angles measured for epoxy coatings demonstrate very close values [11], pointing to a similar behavior of the coating in different aqueous solutions regardless of the presence of electrolytes. Native chitosan showed a 79° contact angle, which is slightly lower than water contact angles recorded in the literature [31], probably due to the presence of a significant amount of NaCl in the droplet, as high amounts of electrolyte can flow into the chitosan and tend to reduce the contact angle [18]. When chitosan was deposited under the epoxy layer on zinc, this value increased to 77°, suggesting improved structural stability and reduced water intake of the external epoxy layer. The situation of the "sandwich-like coating" differs from that reported for epoxy/chitosan composite coatings, where the incorporation of chitosan in the epoxy matrix resulted in higher hydrophilicity of the material [12]. After the coating was peeled off, the contact angle dropped to 69°, as the zinc This conclusion is supported by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements carried out to analyze the surface status of the different samples ( Figure 4). The native chitosan covers some of the irregularities of the polished zinc surface; in contrast, a uniform coating was obtained when an epoxy layer was deposited on the substrate. Further magnification showed small cracks on the epoxy monolayer, (inset in Figure 4C) which could not be seen when the chitosan sublayer was also present ( Figure 4D). This was attributed to improved structural stability. These results are in good accordance with contact angle measurements, where the chitosan underlayer reduced the wettability of the epoxy. After peeling, the zinc surface was regenerated with only low amounts of chitosan residue remaining, covering the major grooves on the metal surface ( Figure 4E).

Electrochemical Characterization
First of all, the open circuit potentials (OCPs) were determined for the bare Zn and the Chit-, EP-, and Chit/EP-coated Zn samples in 3 w/w% NaCl solution. The potential values recorded after 30 min of immersion are presented in Table 2.

Electrochemical Characterization
First of all, the open circuit potentials (OCPs) were determined for the bare Zn and the Chit-, EP-, and Chit/EP-coated Zn samples in 3 w/w% NaCl solution. The potential values recorded after 30 min of immersion are presented in Table 2.  It can be seen that the OCP values of coated Zn shifted toward more-positive potentials in comparison to the bare Zn, which means that an ennoblement of the surface can be noticed. As expected, a larger shift was noticed in the case of double-layer-coated zinc.
To determine the protective effect of the Chit, EP, and Chit/EP coatings on the Zn substrate, EIS (electrochemical impedance spectroscopy) measurements were performed on the coated samples at OCP, and the results were compared with those obtained on the bare Zn. The recorded Bode impedance diagrams are compiled in Figure 5. (V vs. Ag/AgCl/KClsat) Zn −0.998 Zn/Chit −0.981 Zn/EP −0.979 Zn/Chit/EP −0.926 It can be seen that the OCP values of coated Zn shifted toward more-positive potentials in comparison to the bare Zn, which means that an ennoblement of the surface can be noticed. As expected, a larger shift was noticed in the case of double-layer-coated zinc.
To determine the protective effect of the Chit, EP, and Chit/EP coatings on the Zn substrate, EIS (electrochemical impedance spectroscopy) measurements were performed on the coated samples at OCP, and the results were compared with those obtained on the bare Zn. The recorded Bode impedance diagrams are compiled in Figure 5. The good performance of the coatings is reflected by some elements of the Bode plots, such as the absolute impedance |Z|0.01Hz, correlated with their barrier properties, and the value of the phase angle at 10 kHz, θ10kHz [32]. Different values of the phase angle suggest different behaviors: a phase angle around −70° suggests that the coatings have a predominant capacitive behavior, −90° corresponds to an ideal capacitor, 0° corresponds to an The good performance of the coatings is reflected by some elements of the Bode plots, such as the absolute impedance |Z| 0.01Hz , correlated with their barrier properties, and the value of the phase angle at 10 kHz, θ 10kHz [32]. Different values of the phase angle suggest different behaviors: a phase angle around −70 • suggests that the coatings have a predominant capacitive behavior, −90 • corresponds to an ideal capacitor, 0 • corresponds to an ideal resistor, and +90 • corresponds to an ideal inductor. Values in between may indicate non-ideal, mixed behavior [33].
As can be seen, the Chit coating barely increased the value of the absolute impedance of zinc (ca. 1 kΩ cm 2 ), while the EP layer enhanced it by three orders of magnitude (2149 kΩ cm 2 ). In the case of the double-layered coating, Chit/EP, this value was even greater (4090 kΩ cm 2 ). Moreover, in the last case, the phase angle θ 10kHz was also the highest (about −85 • ).
A comparison with the literature data reported for other protective systems (e.g., the styrene-acrylic coating on steel [30]) led to the conclusion that the impedance modulus of the Zn/Chit/EP coating at low frequencies (~10 6 ) was comparable or even higher.
The calculated (Equation (4)) inhibition efficiency IE% value for the Zn/Chit sample was close to 6%. This indicates that, as was expected from previous studies, the Chit coating alone did not offer any significant protection to the metal in the 3 w/w% NaCl solution, Gels 2023, 9, 361 9 of 15 due to its porosity [14,18]. In contrast, the EP and Chit/EP coatings exhibited 99.95%, and 99.97% inhibition efficiency values, respectively. Thus, it can be stated that the Chit/EP bilayer offers better protection than the simple Chit or EP coating.
To better understand this behavior, the experimental impedance data were fitted to electrical equivalent circuits. For the bare, pretreated zinc, the best circuit found was a simple R s (Q dl R ct ), where R s is the resistance of the electrolyte solution, while the Q dl R ct pair represents the non-ideal charge transfer at the metal/electrolyte interface. In the case of the epoxy-coated systems, both in the presence and absence of a chitosan sublayer, the best fit was obtained with an R s (Q coat R coat )(Q dl R ct ) circuit, where R s is the resistance of the electrolyte, and Q coat and R coat are attributed to the coating, while Q dl and R ct represent the charge transfer at the electric double layer [9]. The same equivalent circuit was used for the chitosan coating.
The electrochemical parameters for the different Zn samples are presented in Table 3. It should be noted that the resistance of the electrolyte solution was negligible in comparison to all other sources of resistance. The polarization resistance, which is the sum of resistances (R s can be omitted), in the case of epoxy layers was three orders of magnitude above those determined for chitosan alone. Table 3. Electrochemical parameter values for Zn, Zn/Chit, Zn/EP, and Zn/Chit/EP samples in 3 w/w% NaCl solution, calculated by non-linear regression of the impedance data using the equivalent circuit presented in Figure 5C,D (n~0.8). Besides bare Zn, the smallest polarization resistance was noticed in the case of Zn/Chit samples. This could be explained by the probability that the electrolyte easily penetrates the porous Chit coating and can reach the coating/metal interface, resulting in a higher capacitance and smaller polarization resistance.

Sample
In the case of epoxy-coated samples (Zn/EP), the capacitance values were significantly lower compared to those of the Zn and Zn/Chit systems, and the resistance values were three orders of magnitude higher.
The Zn/Chit/EP coating's highest anti-corrosive protection can be explained by better physical shielding of the substrate, due to the increased thickness of the coating (see Section 2.1), as well as due to the interactions between the chitosan and epoxy layers, which result in a more stable system.
A similar resistance increase for the double-layer coatings in comparison with the monolayer peelable coatings based on waterborne polyurethane resin was reported in the literature in the case of stainless steel [5].
In addition to the parameters mentioned above, |Z| 0.01Hz and θ 10kHz , the breakpoint frequency (F b ) plays an increasingly important role in the interpretations of EIS data to analyze the delamination of the organic coatings. The F b is defined as the frequency corresponding to a 45-phase angle at a high-frequency range [34] and can be correlated with the delaminated area A t , the total area of the sample A 0 , and a K constant through Equation (1): where K is expressed by Equation (2), which contains the resistivity of the coating ρ, the dielectric constant of electrolyte in the coating ε 0, and ε, the vacuum permittivity [34]: A higher value for F b indicates poorer protection [35]. In our case, comparing the F b of Zn/EP (F b1 = 137 Hz) and Zn/Chit/EP (F b2 = 64 Hz) samples, one can conclude that better protection is provided by the Chit/EP coating. This is in agreement with the calculated electrochemical parameters based on the equivalent electrical circuits.
Graphical analysis also can be performed on the Bode diagrams. The area under the horizontal part of the plot at low frequencies, representing the resistive region, can be correlated with the penetration of electrolyte into the coatings' pores and reflect its barrier properties. The capacitive behavior is related to the inclined part of the curve, and the area underneath corresponds to the capacitive region. The extent of the capacitive region indicates the coating's performance [32]: a more extensive area shows a more intact and performant coating. In the case of the two abovementioned systems, it can be easily observed ( Figure 6) that the capacitive region for the Zn/Chit/EP (A 2 ≈ 3.77 × 10 9 ) is larger than that for the Zn/EP (A 1 ≈ 2.23 × 10 9 ), confirming that the double coating provides better coverage of the zinc substrate.
A 0 where K is expressed by Equation (2), which contains the resistivity of the coating ρ, the dielectric constant of electrolyte in the coating ε0, and ε, the vacuum permittivity [34]: A higher value for Fb indicates poorer protection [35]. In our case, comparing the Fb of Zn/EP (Fb1 = 137 Hz) and Zn/Chit/EP (Fb2 = 64 Hz) samples, one can conclude that better protection is provided by the Chit/EP coating. This is in agreement with the calculated electrochemical parameters based on the equivalent electrical circuits.
Graphical analysis also can be performed on the Bode diagrams. The area under the horizontal part of the plot at low frequencies, representing the resistive region, can be correlated with the penetration of electrolyte into the coatings' pores and reflect its barrier properties. The capacitive behavior is related to the inclined part of the curve, and the area underneath corresponds to the capacitive region. The extent of the capacitive region indicates the coating's performance [32]: a more extensive area shows a more intact and performant coating. In the case of the two abovementioned systems, it can be easily observed ( Figure 6) that the capacitive region for the Zn/Chit/EP (A2 ≈ 3.77×10 9 ) is larger than that for the Zn/EP (A1 ≈ 2.23×10 9 ), confirming that the double coating provides better coverage of the zinc substrate.

Influence of The Electrolyte Nature
To test the resistance of the coatings in various corrosive electrolytes, the doublelayered samples were soaked in 3 w/w% NaCl, 2 M NaOH, and 1 M HCl solutions, and,

Influence of the Electrolyte Nature
To test the resistance of the coatings in various corrosive electrolytes, the doublelayered samples were soaked in 3 w/w% NaCl, 2 M NaOH, and 1 M HCl solutions, and, from the obtained EIS spectra, the breakpoint frequencies (F b ) were calculated. To get an interpretation of the coatings' behavior in different conditions, the obtained Bode spectra were compared (Figure 7). Interestingly, the lowest value of the breakpoint frequency (F b1 = 77 Hz) was obtained for the sample soaked in NaCl solution, and the capacitive region (area ABC) in this case had the largest value. This finding points out the protective nature of the coating. After immersion in the acid medium, the breakpoint frequency increased (F b2 = 266 Hz), and the lowest area was obtained for the capacitive region (the GHI geometric shape), indicating advanced delamination of the coating. Taking into account that the chitosan is dissolved in acidic mediums and that, by immersion, the aggressive electrolyte can penetrate the coating, the delamination in this case can be easily explained by the adherence loss due to the primer coat's dissolution. The alkaline medium causes an advanced deterioration of the coating in comparison with the NaCl solution but less than the acidic environment. Although the F b value was lower, as was the capacitive region (marked by DECF), the decrease of |Z| 0.01Hz was small compared with that in the NaCl solution. This behavior is probably due to the deterioration of the upper epoxy layer. = 77 Hz) was obtained for the sample soaked in NaCl solution, and the capacitive region (area ABC) in this case had the largest value. This finding points out the protective nature of the coating. After immersion in the acid medium, the breakpoint frequency increased (Fb2 = 266 Hz), and the lowest area was obtained for the capacitive region (the GHI geometric shape), indicating advanced delamination of the coating. Taking into account that the chitosan is dissolved in acidic mediums and that, by immersion, the aggressive electrolyte can penetrate the coating, the delamination in this case can be easily explained by the adherence loss due to the primer coat's dissolution. The alkaline medium causes an advanced deterioration of the coating in comparison with the NaCl solution but less than the acidic environment. Although the Fb value was lower, as was the capacitive region (marked by DECF), the decrease of |Z|0.01Hz was small compared with that in the NaCl solution. This behavior is probably due to the deterioration of the upper epoxy layer.

Influence of The Immersion Time
To test the coatings' resistance over time in highly corrosive NaCl media, Bode impedance spectra were recorded after 2 and 24 h, respectively. As expected, a steady decrease in the absolute impedance after continuous exposure to the corrosive environment was noticed ( Figure 8). However, a difference between the various samples was observed. Hence, after 1 day of exposure in 3 w/w% NaCl solution, both Zn/Chit/EP and Zn/EP samples showed a continuous decrease of their corrosion resistance, but the Zn/Chit/EP presented a much slower degradation. The examination of the coatings' thickness and their surface will enlighten us to the causes of this behavior (see Section 2.1).

Influence of the Immersion Time
To test the coatings' resistance over time in highly corrosive NaCl media, Bode impedance spectra were recorded after 2 and 24 h, respectively. As expected, a steady decrease in the absolute impedance after continuous exposure to the corrosive environment was noticed ( Figure 8). However, a difference between the various samples was observed. Hence, after 1 day of exposure in 3 w/w% NaCl solution, both Zn/Chit/EP and Zn/EP samples showed a continuous decrease of their corrosion resistance, but the Zn/Chit/EP presented a much slower degradation. The examination of the coatings' thickness and their surface will enlighten us to the causes of this behavior (see Section 2.1). The pseudo-porosity of the coatings can be calculated as in previous studies regarding chitosan [14] and titanium nitride [36] coatings using Equation (3): The pseudo-porosity of the coatings can be calculated as in previous studies regarding chitosan [14] and titanium nitride [36] coatings using Equation (3): where P is the pseudo-porosity of the layer, Rp s represents the metal substrate's polarization resistance, Rp is the coated metal's polarization resistance, ∆E corr is the difference between the metal's and the coated sample's corrosion potential (extracted from linear polarization measurements), and b a is the anodic Tafel coefficient for the substrate. The results are presented in Table 4. The pseudo-porosity of the Chit/EP system was the lowest, suggesting that the Chit beneath the EP layer sealed the EP layer's pores, hindering the electrolyte's access to the Zn substrate, which contributes to the higher corrosion resistance of the double layer.

Conclusions
Chitosan/epoxy anti-corrosive bilayers were successfully deposited on zinc substrates using the dip-coating method. The chitosan sublayer prepared from hydrogel had a beneficial effect on the anti-corrosive coating. The novel system was characterized by reduced wettability and porosity, improved structural integrity, and increased adhesion especially after exposure to a corrosive environment. All epoxy-based coatings showed good protective properties with an inhibition efficiency of 99.9%. Additionally, the bilayer coatings presented the best corrosion resistance. After soaking in an acidic environment, the Chit/EP film could be peeled off on demand without damaging the underlying substrate.
The impedance of the bare zinc was increased by three orders of magnitude when the protective coatings were applied, proving efficient anti-corrosive protection. The breakpoint frequency (F b ), defined as the frequency corresponding to a 45-phase angle at a high-frequency range, confirmed the better protection provided by the Chit/Ep coating when compared to one-layer coatings.
In conclusion, chitosan/epoxy bilayers could be a viable, eco-friendly candidate to produce peelable anti-corrosive coatings during the transportation (especially marine transport) of zinc parts. Furthermore, the simplicity of the method should also improve its potential industrial adaptability.