Evidencing New Roles for the Glycosyl-Transferase Cps1 in the Phytopathogenic Fungus Botrytis cinerea

The fungal cell wall occupies a central place in the interaction between fungi and their environment. This study focuses on the role of the putative polysaccharide synthase Cps1 in the physiology, development and virulence of the grey mold-causing agent Botrytis cinerea. Deletion of the Bccps1 gene does not affect the germination of the conidia (asexual spores) or the early mycelial development, but it perturbs hyphal expansion after 24 h, revealing a two-phase hyphal development that has not been reported so far. It causes a severe reduction of mycelial growth in a solid medium and modifies hyphal aggregation into pellets in liquid cultures. It strongly impairs plant penetration, plant colonization and the formation of sclerotia (survival structures). Loss of the BcCps1 protein associates with a decrease in glucans and glycoproteins in the fungus cell wall and the up-accumulation of 132 proteins in the mutant’s exoproteome, among which are fungal cell wall enzymes. This is accompanied by an increased fragility of the mutant mycelium, an increased sensitivity to some environmental stresses and a reduced adhesion to plant surface. Taken together, the results support a significant role of Cps1 in the cell wall biology of B. cinerea.


Introduction
Fungi are organisms that exhibit a saprophytic, symbiotic or parasitic lifestyle. In all cases, they undergo many biotic and abiotic stresses and interactions during their development. At the interface with their environment lies the fungal cell wall (FCW), a structure that plays a critical role in cell protection and in interaction with other organisms. The FCW is mainly (90%) composed of polysaccharides that are synthesized by membrane proteins of the glycosyltransferases (GTs) family [1,2]. Through cross-linking reactions by specific glycosylhydrolases, the polysaccharides form a matrix to which both GPI-anchored and secreted glycosylated proteins (O-or N-linked mannan or galactomannans) can attach to. These proteins carry important functions, such as signal transduction, adhesion, biofilm formation or cell wall remodeling [3].
FCWs have been described since the late 1970s, but thorough characterizations have only been performed in few species, such as Aspergillus fumigatus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida albicans or Cryptococcus neoformans [4]. In these model organisms, new GT activities (i.e., β-1,3-1,4-glucan synthase) and new structural descriptions continue to expand our knowledge of this important fungal structure [5,6], but the cell wall composition and function in other fungal species remain largely unknown.
The current model of cell wall polysaccharides biosynthesis in fungi proposes that it occurs at the plasma membrane, in the apical regions where the mycelium expand and in the distal regions where septa are built [7,8]. Among the 115 families of GTs inventoried in The current model of cell wall polysaccharides biosynthesis in fungi proposes that it occurs at the plasma membrane, in the apical regions where the mycelium expand and in the distal regions where septa are built [7,8]. Among the 115 families of GTs inventoried in the carbohydrate active enzymes database (CAZy, http://www.cazy.org, August 2022 [9], 4 families group together enzymes able to produce polysaccharides: the GT2, GT5, GT48 and GH16 families. The polysaccharide synthases in these families are iterative enzymes that catalyze the transfer of sugar residues to a carbohydrate acceptor from an activated sugar-nucleotide donor [10]. By doing so they produce a nascent polysaccharide chain, and their supposed localization at the plasma membrane would allow the extrusion and extension of this chain into the FCW. The GT2 family contains the chitin synthases (CHS) that produce chitin, a hallmark polymer of the fungi that plays a structural role in the FCW [11]. The other fungal GT2s have received less attention so far.
In the plant pathogenic and necrotrophic models Botrytis cinerea, the FCW seems to undergo some modifications at the early step of the infection process, when hyphae develop into melanized infection cushions in which chitin appears to be modified into chitosan [12,13]. As in other pathogenic species, the cell wall of B. cinerea is expected to play an important role in virulence, and this is supported by (1) the discovery of inhibitors of CHS activity that protect plants against it [14] and (2) genetic studies that revealed a significant-to-essential role for CHS1, CHS3a, CHS6, and CHS7 in the development of B. cinerea, or in its interaction with plants [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Whether the other GT2-encoding genes would also play an important role in the biogenesis and/or remodeling of the FCW of this fungus has not been investigated.
Here, the role of one GT2-encoding gene in the biology of B. cinerea was studied. This gene is orthologous to the cps1/cpsA genes characterized in the basidiomycete C. neoformans [21,22] and in the ascomycetes Neurospora crassa, A. nidulans, Zymoseptoria tritici, Fusarium graminearum, Magnaporthe oryzae, A. fumigatus and F. verticilloides [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. In all of these fungi, the absence of cps1 has a significant impact on mycelial development, cell wall content and resistance to stresses ( Figure 1A). In the ascomycete fungi, the Cps1 protein is proposed to participate in cell wall biosynthesis, cell growth and host interaction, but its enzymatic function and its exact role have remained as elusive as its polysaccharide product. Our results in B. cinerea reveal new roles of Cps1 in FCW composition and integrity, hyphal growth, sclerotial development and mycelium adhesion to plant surface.   Figure S1). Membrane (Mb), Oxydative (ox). (B) Predicted secondary structure of BcCps1 inside a membrane (dotted line), showing the three TM helices, the catalytic and W domains with the conserved amino-acids (capital letters) and the non-TM hydrophobic helix (M). (C) Predicted 3D model of the B. cinerea BcCps1 protein within a lipid bilayer (blue and red tilted circles). The structure was predicted using AlphaFold Monomer v2.0 and the 3D representation was obtained using the OPM prediction tool (https://opm.phar.umich.edu/ppm_server2, 1 May 2022). The TM helices and the non-TM hydrophobic helix are colored in pink. The other protein fragments are colored following the AlphaFold confidence code (blue (high), yellow (medium), orange (low)).

Sclerotial Development, Conidiation and Germination Assays
Sclerotia were observed on MS plates inoculated with agar explants and incubated for 15 days at 21 • C in darkness. Conidia were collected in PBS-tween 0.02% from MS plates inoculated with 10 4 conidia, incubated in the dark at 21 • C for 3 days and then under near-UV light (365 nm) for 7 days. They were filtered (100 µm) and numerated using a Thoma cell. To assay germination, 10 4 conidia in 150 µL liquid MS were incubated at 21 • C in a 96-wells plate. During 20 h post-inoculation, images were collected every 30 min under the microscope (×40), and conidia with germ tubes longer than 10 µm were scored as germinated conidia.

Bioinformatic Analyses
To construct the fungal Cps1-like protein family, the Cps1 protein of C. neoformans (CNAG_04320) was used as query in the Blastp program [33]. One hundred and fifty-seven different proteomes available on EnsemblFungi (https://fungi.ensembl.org, 1 May 2022) or on the NCBI website (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 1 May 2022) were searched. Every protein sequence with a significant blast hit and a sufficient coverage (>200 amino-acid) was considered as a Cps1-like protein. Data from the similarity search were used to select the species for the phylogenetic analyses: every Leotiomyceta species and 2-4 species for the other taxonomic subphyla or classes were chosen. For the chosen species, every Cps1-like protein was included. Amino-acid sequences were aligned using MAFFT with the L-INS-i algorithm [34]. Regions suitable for phylogenetic inference were selected using BMGE [35]. Default settings were used for MAFFT and BMGE. Maximum likelihood (ML) trees were constructed using PhyML (Guindon et al., 2010) using the following parameters: the LG model with empirical amino-acid frequencies, an estimated proportion of invariable sites, subtree pruning and regrafting (SPR) and five random starting trees added to the standard BioNJ starting tree. A dozen protein sequences likely to disturb the tree topology due to the long branch attraction were excluded (undefined category in Table S2 and Figure S2). The support for each node was estimated using non-parametric bootstraps, with 100 replicates.
The topology of the CPS1 protein was predicted using TOPCONS [36].

Plasmid Constructions and Quantitative Real Time PCR
A ∆Bccps1 deletion cassette was built following the Fungalbraid (GB) instructions [33]. Briefly, the Bccps1 5 and 3 flanking regions (FR, 1 kb each) were produced by PCR using genomic DNA as template and primers containing the barcodes GGAG/AATG and GCTT/CGCT, respectively. The amplicons were individually integrated in the pUPD2 plasmid, and the BsaI restriction site located in the 3 FR was then modified by targeted mutagenesis using IVA cloning [37]. Assemblage to the FB012 bio-brick containing a hygromycin-resistance gene by GB reactions yielded the deletion cassette that was inserted in the pDGB3α1 vector [38]. For compatibility issues with the A. tumefaciens LBA1126 strain, the deletion cassette was then transferred to the P7 vector by IVA cloning. The Bccps1-C complementation cassette was produced by the amplification of the Bccps1 CDS flanked by its promoter (1.5 Kb) and terminator (1363 bp) regions. The amplicon was cloned using IVA cloning and the PmeI restriction site downstream of the PoliC promoter into a P7 plasmid containing the neomycin resistance gene nptII. All expected plasmids were verified by restriction mapping and sequencing before introduction into the A. tumefaciens LBA1126 strain by transformation.

Fungal Transformation and Mutant Purification
B. cinerea was transformed through ATMT [32], except that frozen conidia (−80 • C, 20% glycerol in water) were used instead of fresh conidia. The transformants were tested by PCR. Genetic purification of the deletion strain relied on single-spores isolation and subcultures on solid MS medium plus hygromycin (75 µg/mL), followed by protoplasts isolation and culture in liquid MSS plus hygromycin (70 µg/mL).

Southern Blot
Genomic DNA was extracted from B. cinerea using the DNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and was digested by EcoRI-HF and PmeI (NEB, Rowley, MA, USA). The 5 flanking DNA region (720 bp) of the BcCps1 gene was used as a probe. This DNA fragment was generated by PCR using the For-Cps1-RFG and 3 -southern-Cps1-RFG primers (Table S1) and the DIG Probe Synthesis Kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The DNA profile produced by hybridization of the labelled probe was revealed by using the DIG Luminescent Detection Kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany).

Cell Wall Extracts Preparation
The protocol was adapted from [40,41]. Mycelia were collected from 72 h cultures (10 explants in 200 mL of MS liquid, 21 • C, 110 rpm), lyophilized and blended 3 times for 30 s at 30 Hz (TissueLyser II, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The resulting cell powder was collected by centrifugation (4000 g for 10 min), washed 3 times in 30 mL PBS, suspended in 30 mL PBS-1% SDS, boiled for 15 min, allowed to cool, and collected by centrifugation. The cell wall extracts were washed twice in ice-cold PBS, once in cold water and finally lyophilized and frozen (−80 • C).
For enzymatic digestion of cell wall extacts, 5 mg of Lysing enzymes from Trichoderma harzianum (Sigma, Tokyo, Japan) or 25 U of lichenase from Bacillus subtilis (Megazyme) were dissolved in 300 µL of sodium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 5) and, respectively, used to digest 1 or 2 mg of cell wall extracts during 3 days at 37 • C. Colorimetric assays were used to quantify the released N-acetyl-glucosamine residues or the reducing sugars [42,43].

Plant Infection and Adhesion Assays
French bean leaves (Phaseolus vulgaris var Saxa) were inoculated with 4 mm mycelial explants or 7.5 µL of conidial suspensions (2 × 10 5 conidia, collected from MS cultures/mL Gamborg B5 medium (Duchefa, The Netherlands) supplemented with 2% glucose). The leaves were incubated at 21 • C under 80% relative humidity and dark-light (16 h/8 h) conditions. For adhesion assay, detached bean leaves were inoculated with 4 mm mycelial explants following previous incubation conditions. At 24 hpi, leaves were agitated horizontally in water (8 min, 110 rpm/min), and the detached explants were counted. Adhesion in vitro was assayed in 96 well plates according to Feng et al. 2017 [29]. Conidia (2 × 10 3 in 250 µL MS) were incubated at 21 • C for 24 h. The medium was discarded and the mycelium was washed 3 times with distilled water and stained for 20 min at room temperature with 130 µL of Crystal violet (0.01% in water). Following 3 washes with water, the mycelium was dried at room temperature and destained with 130 µL acetic acid 30%. OD measurement at 560 nm quantified the cells attached to the wells.

Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics
Exoproteomes were prepared from 72 h cultures (10 explants in 200 mL of MS liquid, 21 • C, 110 rpm). To discard possible fungal matrix polymers, the culture filtrates (11 µM nylon membranes) were frozen in liquid nitrogen, left to thaw at 4 • C overnight and centrifuged at 16,000× g for 15 min. The supernatants were mixed with 100% TCA (15% vol/vol) and kept at 4 • C overnight. The protein precipitates were collected by centrifugation (16,000× g, 15 min), washed twice in acetone and solubilized in 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 7, 0.1 M DTT, EDTA 5 mM, glycerol 10%, SDS 4% bromophenol blue 0.008%. Four independent biological replicates were prepared.
Proteins (5 µg) were loaded onto a 10% acrylamide SDS-PAGE gel and visualized by Colloidal Blue staining. Migration was stopped when samples had just entered the resolving gel and the unresolved region of the gel was cut into only one segment. The steps of sample preparation and protein digestion by trypsin were performed as previously described [44]. NanoLC-MS/MS analysis were performed using an Ultimate 3000 RSLC Nano-UPHLC system (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled to a nanospray Orbitrap Fusion™ Lumos™ Tribrid™ Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Each peptide extract was loaded onto a 300 µm ID × 5 mm PepMap C18 precolumn (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a flow rate of 10 µL/min. After a 3 min desalting step, peptides were separated on a 50 cm EasySpray column (75 µm ID, 2 µm C18 beads, 100 Å pore size, ES903, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a 4-40% linear gradient of solvent B (0.1% formic acid in 80% ACN) for 91 min. The separation flow rate was set at 300 nL/min. The mass spectrometer operated in positive ion mode at a 1.9 kV needle voltage. Data were acquired using Xcalibur 4.4 software in a data-dependent mode. MS scans (m/z 375-1500) were recorded at a resolution of R = 120,000 (m/z 200), a standard AGC target and an injection time in automatic mode, followed by a top speed duty cycle of up to 3 s for MS/MS acquisition. Precursor ions (2 to 7 charge states) were isolated in the quadrupole with a mass window of 1.6 Th and fragmented with HCD@28% normalized collision energy. MS/MS data was acquired in the Orbitrap cell with a resolution of R = 30,000 (m/z 200), a standard AGC target and a maximum injection time in automatic mode. Selected precursors were excluded for 60 s. Protein identification and label-free quantification (LFQ) were performed in Proteome Discoverer 2.5. The MS Amanda 2.0, Sequest HT and Mascot 2.5 algorithms were used for protein identification in batch mode by searching against the ENSEMBL B. cinerea ASL83294v1 database (13,749 entries, release 53). Two missed enzyme cleavages were allowed for trypsin. Mass tolerances in MS and MS/MS were set to 10 ppm and 0.02 DA. Oxidation (M) and acetylation (K) were searched as dynamic modifications and carbamidomethylation (C) as static modification. Peptide validation was performed using the Percolator algorithm and only "high confidence" peptides were retained, corresponding to a 1% false discovery rate at peptide level [45]. Minora feature detector node (LFQ) was used along with the feature mapper and precursor ions quantifier. The quantification parameters were selected as follows: (1) unique peptides, (2) precursor abundance based on intensity, (3) normalization mode: total peptide amount, (4) protein abundance calculation: summed abundances, (5) protein ratio calculation: pairwise ratio based, (6) imputation mode: low-abundance resampling and (7) hypothesis test: t-test (background based). Quantitative data were considered for master proteins, quantified by a minimum of 2 unique peptides, a fold changes above 2 and an occurrence in at least 3 of the 4 biological replicates. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD033590 [46].

Activities of Secreted Enzymes
Proteases, xylanases and laccases activities were measured in De Vallée et al. [47]. Supernatants from the 72 h cultures (10 explants in 200 mL of MS liquid, 21 • C, 110 rpm) were used as enzyme samples. Acid protease activity was measured by incubating (24 h, 30 • C) the samples (150 µL) with 450 µL of 1% hemoglobin (Sigma, Tokyo, Japan), pH 3.5. Reactions were stopped with 25% trichloroacetic acid (400 µL). After centrifugation, supernatants were mixed with 0.5 M NaOH (vol/vol) in UV microplates and optical density was read at 280 nm. Xylanase and cellulase activities were recorded on a plate reader TECAN infinite M1000 using the EnzChek-Ultra-xylanase assay kit (Thermofisher, Vilnus, Lituania) and the cellulase assay kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), respectively. Laccase activity was measured by incubating 10 µL of samples and 30 µL of ABTS as substrate (Sigma, Tokyo, Japan) in 230 µL of 50 mM Na-acetate buffer, pH 4.0. Oxidation of ABTS was recorded at 405 nm (Molecular Devices Spectramax-485) during 30 min at 30 • C. One unit was defined as the amount of enzyme producing an increase of 0.01 OD unit per min. Pectin methyl esterase (PME) and amylase activities were measured using plate assays based on Lionetti [48]. 1.5% agarose in 100 mM NaCl was supplemented with 0.1% pectin or 0.1% starch. Wells (5 mm) were punched, filled with samples (40 µL) and the plates were incubated at 37 • C for 24 h. The PME activity was revealed by a dark red circle after flooding of the pectoplates with 5 mL ruthenium red 0.05% (30 min at room temperature) and several washes with water. Similarly, Lugol (20%) was used to reveal the amylase activity as clear circular halos in the starch plates.

The Botrytis Cps-Encoding Genes
Cps proteins constitute a fungal family of type two glycosyltransferases (GT2, Figure 1A). In the species from the Leotiomyceta order, this family is split into two paralog subfamilies, Cps1 and Cps2, due to a gene duplication in their ancestor genome ( Figure S1) [28]. A member of the Cps1 subfamily was clearly identified in the 39 ascomycetous Leotiomyceta species analyzed ( Figure S2, Table S2). In contrast, 14 of these 39 species no longer carry a gene of the Cps2 subfamily, including Sclerotinia sclerotorium and Blumeria graminis, the proximate species of B. cinerea (Table S2), while the latter does carry a cps2 gene. Moreover, the amino-acid sequences of the Cps2 proteins are less conserved than that of the Cps1 proteins, as shown by their longer branches in the phylogenetic tree ( Figure S1). In B. cinerea, the expression of Bccps1 (Bcin05g06910) has been detected during the germination of conidia [49] and during vegetative growth in liquid cultures, as well as in solid cultures enriched in infection cushions, where it is moderately (×2.7) increased [13]. On the other hand, the expression of Bccps2 (Bcin03g03750) has never been observed in the transcriptomic analyses conducted so far. Together, the difference in gene conservation and in gene expression suggests a likely functional role for Bccps1 and a secondary or dispensable role for Bccps2. However, our attempt to isolate a homocaryotic ∆Bccps1 mutant line was successful, whereas the isolation of a homocaryotic ∆Bccps2 mutant line resisted 10 rounds of single-conidia or protoplasts purification steps. In the absence of a Bccps2 mutant line, this study focuses on the characterization of the Bccps1 gene.
Cps1 proteins share a common topology of integral membrane protein with the conserved catalytic GT2 domain located in the central region of the protein ( Figure 1B). When submitting the sequence of BcCps1 to the algorithm AlphaFold Monomer v2.0, a 3D model of the protein was obtained ( Figure 1C) that was very similar to the only two other models available for Cps1, from the plant pathogen Z. tritici (https://alphafold. com/entry/F9WWD1, 1 May 2022) and the human pathogen Cladophialophora carrionii (https://alphafold.com/entry/A0A1C1CM71, 1 May 2022). These models highlight a membrane anchoring of Cps1 through one N-and two C-terminal transmembrane (TM) helices. The catalytic GT2 domain is positioned on the cytoplasmic face of the membrane, as well as the C-terminal tail of the protein that contains the conserved W motif and ends with a disordered region. Similarly to the situation in chitin synthases [11], one hydrophobic helix is predicted not to cross the membrane. The model proposes its longitudinal orientation in the membrane ( Figure 1C).

Deletion of the Bccps1 Gene and Localization of the BcCps1 Protein
A hygromycin B resistance cassette ( Figure S3A) was introduced in B. cinerea via A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation (ATMT) to replace the Bccps1 gene. The selected transformants were heterocaryons. Based on the work of King et al. [28], homocaryons were sought by isolating protoplasts prepared from these transformants in a rich liquid medium supplemented with saccharose (an osmo-protective agent). After two successive rounds of this purification process, PCR diagnostics and Southern blot analysis confirmed the isolation of the expected ∆Bccps1 deletion strain by showing the absence of the parental Bccps1 locus and the presence of the unique, expected DNA fragment corresponding to the mutated locus ( Figure S3). Subsequently, a complemented strain was obtained by an ATMT-mediated random insertion of a DNA cassette carrying the Bccps1 gene ( Figure S3D) inside the genome of the deletion mutant.
To get a clue about the localization of the BcCps1 protein, transformed lines of B. cinerea were constructed that carried a DNA cassette coding for a BcCps1 protein fused to a green fluorescent protein (GFP, optimized for B. cinerea [50]). The GFP sequence was inserted in 3 different positions of the BcCps1 sequence: (1) at the N-terminus, (2) after the predicted N-ter TM helix and (3) at the C-terminus ( Figure S4A). Unfortunately, a fluorescent signal could only be detected in transformants producing BcCps1 fused to GFP at the C-terminus, and this signal was intra-vacuolar ( Figure S4B). Such labelling, identical to that reported for Cps1 in M. oryzae and in A. nidulans [24,29], suggests the cleavage of the fusion protein while the absence of GFP signal in the other transformants suggests folding issues not compatible with the production of the recombinant proteins.

Role of BcCps1 in Mycelial Growth
When the ∆Bccps1 mutant strain was inoculated on a rich solid medium, it grew 90% slower than the parental strain (Figure 2A), and a similar result (83% reduction) was obtained on a minimal medium (data not shown). In a rich liquid medium, the ∆Bccps1 mutant produced 65% less biomass than the parental strain ( Figure 2B), indicating a strong growth impairment under these conditions as well, but less than on a solid medium. Moreover, the liquid cultures revealed a small pellet phenotype in the mutant strain. In comparison with the uniform spongy pellets produced by the explants of the parental strain used to inoculate the medium, more numerous and smaller pellets were collected from the development of the ∆Bccps1 explants that appeared smoother, denser and drier ( Figure 2C). These results indicate that BcCps1 plays an important role in vegetative growth. In the complemented strain, the parental growth rate and biomass production were restored (Figure 2), and this argued for the ∆Bccps1 mutation being solely responsible for the observed growth phenotypes.
To get a clue about the localization of the BcCps1 protein, transformed lines of B. cinerea were constructed that carried a DNA cassette coding for a BcCps1 protein fused to a green fluorescent protein (GFP, optimized for B. cinerea [50]). The GFP sequence was inserted in 3 different positions of the BcCps1 sequence: (1) at the N-terminus, (2) after the predicted N-ter TM helix and (3) at the C-terminus ( Figure S4A). Unfortunately, a fluorescent signal could only be detected in transformants producing BcCps1 fused to GFP at the C-terminus, and this signal was intra-vacuolar ( Figure S4B). Such labelling, identical to that reported for Cps1 in M. oryzae and in A. nidulans [24,29], suggests the cleavage of the fusion protein while the absence of GFP signal in the other transformants suggests folding issues not compatible with the production of the recombinant proteins.

Role of BcCps1 in Mycelial Growth
When the ΔBccps1 mutant strain was inoculated on a rich solid medium, it grew 90% slower than the parental strain (Figure 2A), and a similar result (83% reduction) was obtained on a minimal medium (data not shown). In a rich liquid medium, the ΔBccps1 mutant produced 65% less biomass than the parental strain ( Figure 2B), indicating a strong growth impairment under these conditions as well, but less than on a solid medium. Moreover, the liquid cultures revealed a small pellet phenotype in the mutant strain. In comparison with the uniform spongy pellets produced by the explants of the parental strain used to inoculate the medium, more numerous and smaller pellets were collected from the development of the ΔBccps1 explants that appeared smoother, denser and drier ( Figure 2C). These results indicate that BcCps1 plays an important role in vegetative growth. In the complemented strain, the parental growth rate and biomass production were restored (Figure 2), and this argued for the ΔBccps1 mutation being solely responsible for the observed growth phenotypes.  The difference in pellet size and number suggested an increased fragility of the mutant hyphae that would result in mycelium-breaking events during growth under agitation and the subsequent rise of satellite pellets. Interestingly, when the mutant hyphae grew out of a droplet of liquid medium onto a plastic surface, frequent hyphal rupture events were revealed by the leakage of the cell content at the breaking sites ( Figure 3A). As to the aspect of the ∆Bccps1 mycelial pellets, it was suggestive of a modified cell wall or extra-cellular matrix and/or a modified mycelium development. In relation with this, microscopy analysis of the mutant hyphae expanding from conidia on agar plates revealed no difference when compared with the parental strain during the first 24 h of growth, but a hyperbranched mycelium latter on ( Figure 3B). On a plastic surface, again no difference could be observed in the first 24 h between the mutant and parental strains, but tufts of ramifications (multibranching) at the margin of the nascent colony were then observed in the mutant, and not in the parental, strain ( Figure 3B). To better evaluate how these changes in mycelium development over time could relate to the Bccps1 gene, the expression of that gene was monitored in the parental strain at 24, 48 and 72 h of growth. As shown in Figure 3C, a 10-fold increase in Bccps1 expression was recorded between 24 h and 48 h, and this increased almost 5-fold more between 48 h and 72 h. Altogether, these results suggest that the conidia of B. cinerea give rise to a mycelial colony through two phases, and that Bccps1 plays a role in mycelium development and integrity during the second phase. In the complemented strain, hyphal rupture events were not seen and the parental branching pattern of the mycelium was restored.

Role of BcCps1 in Sclerotia Formation, in Conidiation and in Germination
Depending on the environmental conditions, the mycelia of B. cinerea can produce resistant structures called sclerotia or conidiophores that generate asexual spores (conidia). To explore the role that BcCps1 might play in these developmental processes, explants of the parental and mutant strains were used to inoculate plates of rich medium that were incubated in the dark for 2 weeks in order to favor the formation of sclerotia ( Figure 4A). As expected, the parental strain produced numerous white sclerotial initials that matured into melanized (dark) and dry sclerotia at 12 to 15 days of culture. In comparison, the mutant strain produced white and dense cotton-like masses that resembled the sclerotial precursors produced by the parental strain at day 9, but these structures never turned into sclerotia, even when the incubation time was prolonged (up to 4 weeks, data not shown). This demonstrates that BcCps1 is involved in the process underlying sclerotial development, and rather during maturation than during the first stages of their development. sclerotial development, and rather during maturation than during the first stages of their development.
A second set of plates was incubated under near-UV illumination to favor asexual reproduction. In comparison with the parental colonies, the mutant mycelium produced colonies with powdery patches ( Figure 4B). Counting of the conidia recovered from these plates showed no significant reduction in sporulation in the mutant strain, but microscopy observations revealed that 43% of the mutant's conidia were deformed, a proportion 13 times superior to that found in the parental sample ( Figure 4C). This suggests that BcCps1 is involved in the process associated with asexual spore formation. By contrast, it does not participate in the conidial germination process, as the counting of conidia producing a germ tube showed no significant difference between the parental and mutant strains, including the deformed conidia that also germinated ( Figure S5). Lastly, in the mutant strain, only microconidia were noticed alongside the collected conidia. In the complemented strain, the aspect of the reproductive mycelium was fully restored ( Figure 4B) and the default in conidia formation was corrected by 60% ( Figure 4C). On the other hand, the default in sclerotia formation was not corrected ( Figure 4A).  A second set of plates was incubated under near-UV illumination to favor asexual reproduction. In comparison with the parental colonies, the mutant mycelium produced colonies with powdery patches ( Figure 4B). Counting of the conidia recovered from these plates showed no significant reduction in sporulation in the mutant strain, but microscopy observations revealed that 43% of the mutant's conidia were deformed, a proportion 13 times superior to that found in the parental sample ( Figure 4C). This suggests that BcCps1 is involved in the process associated with asexual spore formation. By contrast, it does not participate in the conidial germination process, as the counting of conidia producing a germ tube showed no significant difference between the parental and mutant strains, including the deformed conidia that also germinated ( Figure S5). Lastly, in the mutant strain, only microconidia were noticed alongside the collected conidia. In the complemented strain, the aspect of the reproductive mycelium was fully restored ( Figure 4B) and the default in conidia formation was corrected by 60% ( Figure 4C). On the other hand, the default in sclerotia formation was not corrected ( Figure 4A).

Role of BcCps1 in Cell Wall Integrity and Composition
The integrity of the ∆Bccps1 mutant cell wall was analyzed by growing the mutant mycelium on solid media containing osmotic, oxidative or cell wall-stressing agents. When compared to the parental strain, this revealed an 28% increased sensitivity of the mutant strain to Congo red ( Figure 5A), while a similar tolerance to hyperosmotic conditions (KCl), to SDS and to menadione was recorded ( Figure S6A). In parallel, the effect of osmoprotective molecules such as sorbitol and saccharose on the growth of the mutant strain was explored. Whereas these molecules had no effect on the growth of the parental or complemented strains, they, respectively, showed a 151% and 188% positive effect on the growth of the mutant mycelium ( Figure 5B).
To gain information about the cell wall composition of the ∆Bccps1 mutant, miniaturized fluorescent assays were developed to analyze cell wall extracts ( Figure 5C). The first marker to be selected was aniline blue for its known interaction with β-1,3 glucans [51]. Upon mixing with the mutant cell wall extracts, it generated a fluorescent signal that was half (-48%) of the signal detected with the cell extracts of the parental strain. Concanavalin-A was then selected for its established interaction with glycoproteins [52]. The interaction of a fluorescent derivative (FITC) of this molecule with the mutant cell wall extracts produced a signal 37% less intense than the one produced with the parent counterpart. Finally, Congo red was selected for its reported broader spectrum of interactants, namely chitin, some glucans and amyloid proteins [53]. To this molecule the mutant cell wall extracts interacted one-third less (−32%) than the control extracts. Since Congo red can interact with chitin, this last result questioned a possible chitin content reduction in the mutant cell wall. The fluorescent chitin marker calcofluor was therefore introduced in the miniaturized assay [54], but its strong intrinsic fluorescence forced washing steps that caused too much variation across the replicates to achieve consistent readings. As an alternative, the parent and mutant cell wall extracts were treated with cell wall lysing enzymes and the release of N-acetyl-glucosamine residues was quantified, showing no difference between the two strains ( Figure S6B). Lastly, the cell wall extracts were digested by a lichenase to detect the putative presence of β-1,3-1,4 glucan in B. cinerea and to test the role suggested in N. crassa for Cps1 in the biosynthesis of this polysaccharide [30]. Products of the enzyme reaction were detected, arguing for the presence of this polymer in the cell wall of B. cinerea, but no difference could be observed between the mutant and parental strains ( Figure S6B). Altogether, these results suggest a modified integrity and composition of the cell wall in the mutant strain, with a decrease in β-1,3 glucans and glycoproteins contents and probably no change in chitin or β-1,3-1,4 glucan contents. Re-introduction of the Bccps1 gene in the mutant strain partially restored its cell wall composition and integrity ( Figure 5).

Exoproteome Analysis of the ΔBccps1 Mutant Strain
The exoproteome of the mutant strain was explored through a shotgun proteomic analysis and compared to that of the parental strain. Both strains were grown in liquid cultures under the same conditions used to prepare cell wall extracts. Four biological replicates were prepared, and the proteins present in the supernatants were precipitated and subjected to mass spectrometry analysis. The proteins identified with a minimum of two unique peptides, an occurrence of at least three biological replicates out of four and a fold

Exoproteome Analysis of the ∆Bccps1 Mutant Strain
The exoproteome of the mutant strain was explored through a shotgun proteomic analysis and compared to that of the parental strain. Both strains were grown in liquid cultures under the same conditions used to prepare cell wall extracts. Four biological replicates were prepared, and the proteins present in the supernatants were precipitated and subjected to mass spectrometry analysis. The proteins identified with a minimum of two unique peptides, an occurrence of at least three biological replicates out of four and a fold change above two between the two strains were retained for the comparative evaluation of the effect of the mutation on the exoproteome. This resulted in the listing of 132 proteins up-accumulated and 51 proteins down-accumulated in the mutant exoproteome when compared with the parental counterpart (Table S3). Based on the predicted presence of signal peptides (SP) [55] and TM, 157 of these proteins (85.8%) would be secreted through the conventional secretory pathway. Further in silico analysis, including manually curated B. cinerea protein lists [13], led to a functional classification for 140 of the 183 proteins (Table S3). As shown in Figure 6A, the mutant exoproteome is characterized by the upaccumulation of FCW proteins, of enzymes involved in metabolism and in oxidoreduction and of proteases, cellulases and proteins related to nucleic acids metabolism. More detailed analysis distinguished sub-categories of metabolic enzymes (related to lipids/sterols and to phosphate) and sub-categories of FCW proteins ( Figure 6B). The first FCW sub-category relates to chitin and contains two chitinases and three chitin deacetylases. The second sub-category relates to α glucan and contains three glycosyl hydrolases (family 71). The third sub-category relates to β glucan and contains nine proteins, among which are BcGas5, BcBgl2 and BcScw11. The last sub-category contains two glycoproteins and three proteins involved in the cross linking of chitin and glucans, including the cell death-inducing protein BcCrh1 [56]. The last proteins whose accumulation in the exoproteome were modified by the ∆Bccps1 mutation were plant cuticle-and plant cell wall-degrading enzymes (PCWDE), among which were pectinases, hemicellulases and amylases (Table S3). However, the accumulation profile was mixed for these proteins, with some being up-accumulated and others being down-accumulated ( Figure 6A).
To complete these data, biochemical assays were performed to measure enzymatic activities. The parental and mutant supernatants used to prepare the exoproteome samples were confronted to substrates specific of proteases, xylanases, laccases, amylases, pectinase/pectin-methyl-esterases (PME) and cellulases. In consistence with the upaccumulation of proteases in the mutant exoproteome, more proteolytic activity (200%) was measured in the mutant secretome ( Figure 6C). A reduced amylolytic activity (−95%) also corroborated the down-accumulation of two amylases in this secretome (classified in Other CAZy in Figure 6A). On the other hand, the mixed up-and down-accumulations of laccases (three up, two down, classified in Oxidoreduction in Figure 6A), xylanases (three each) and PMEs (one each) in the mutant exoproteome were associated with a 90%, 68% and 98% reduction in laccase, xylanase and PME activity, respectively. Under our conditions, no cellulase or pectinase activity was detected in either strain. Apart from the proteases, these results revealed a weak enzymatic arsenal in the ∆Bccps1 secretome that was restored to the parental level in the complemented strain ( Figure S7).

Role of BcCps1 in the Interaction of B. cinerea with a Host Plant
To evaluate the impact of the Bccps1 deletion on the virulence of B. cinerea, both mycelial explants and conidial suspensions were used to inoculate bean leaves. When the experiment was performed with explants, the parental hyphae rapidly colonized the plant tissues to produce clearly visible necrosis areas at 2 dpi ( Figure 7A). At 4 dpi, the leaves were half colonized. In the case of the mutant strain, small areas of necrosis could be observed, but this was delayed by at least 2 days when compared with the parental strain and showed no evolution with time ( Figure 7A). In addition, 40% of the mutant's explants triggered no necrosis ( Figure 7B) and 40% of the mutant's explants were defective in adhering to the leaf surface ( Figure 7C). These results indicate that BcCps1 plays a role in hyphal adhesion to a plant surface and in tissue invasion.  Table S3). CAZy, carbohydrate active enzymes; FCW, fungal cell wall; HP, hemicellulose pectin; HC, hemicellulose cellulose. (B) Sub-categorization of the categories « FCW proteins » and « Metabolism » (see Table S3). The down-accumulated proteins (green) are plotted as negative numbers. (C) Enzymatic activities measured on the same supernatants used for the proteomic analysis (four replicates). The results are shown as percentages of the parental strain values. PMEs; pectin methyl esterases. Means and standard deviations were calculated from three independent experiments (n = 12). 100% activity in the parental strain correspond to 0.41 OD 280 /mg dry mycelium (Proteases), 36 RFU/min.mg dry mycelium (Xylanases), 7.9 × 10 −3 RFU/min.mg dry mycelium (Laccases), 2.35 cm/40 µL supernatant (PMEs) and 2 cm/40 µL supernatant (Amylases).

Role of BcCps1 in the Interaction of B. cinerea with a Host Plant
To evaluate the impact of the Bccps1 deletion on the virulence of B. cinerea, both mycelial explants and conidial suspensions were used to inoculate bean leaves. When the experiment was performed with explants, the parental hyphae rapidly colonized the plant tissues to produce clearly visible necrosis areas at 2 dpi ( Figure 7A). At 4 dpi, the leaves were half colonized. In the case of the mutant strain, small areas of necrosis could be observed, but this was delayed by at least 2 days when compared with the parental strain and showed no evolution with time ( Figure 7A). In addition, 40% of the mutant's explants  Table S3). CAZy, carbohydrate active enzymes; FCW, fungal cell wall; HP, hemicellulose pectin; HC, hemicellulose cellulose. (B) Sub-categorization of the categories « FCW proteins » and « Metabolism » (see Table S3). The down-accumulated proteins (green) are plotted as negative numbers. (C) Enzymatic activities measured on the same supernatants used for the proteomic analysis (four replicates). The results are shown as percentages of the parental strain values. PMEs; pectin methyl esterases. Means and standard deviations were calculated from three independent experiments (n = 12). 100% activity in the parental strain correspond to 0.41 OD 280 /mg dry mycelium (Proteases), 36 RFU/min.mg dry mycelium (Xylanases), 7.9 × 10 −3 RFU/min.mg dry mycelium (Laccases), 2.35 cm/40 µL supernatant (PMEs) and 2 cm/40 µL supernatant (Amylases).
When conidial suspensions were used in the infection assays, the mutant strain triggered a visible plant reaction similar to that observed with the parental strain at 2 dpi. However, the parental mycelium then colonized the leaves, while the mutant mycelium did not ( Figure 7D). This questioned the capacity of the mutant conidia at germinating on the plant surface, the capacity of the mutant mycelium at adhering to this surface and/or the capacity of the mutant mycelium at producing infection cushions. Microscopy analysis at 2 dpi revealed that the mutant conidia had germinated and had produced mycelium at the plant surface, even more so than the parental strain ( Figure 7E). In parallel, adhesion assays in vitro showed that the mycelium produced in 24 h by the conidia of the mutant strain was not affected in adherence. On the other hand, in 48 h of hyphal development on either glass or plastic surfaces, this mycelium produced numerous hooks (precursors of infection cushions (IC)), but rare ICs when compared with the parental mycelium ( Figure 7F). This suggests that BcCps1 plays a role in the development of ICs, and therefore in the penetration step of plant infection. Re-introduction of the Bccps1 gene in the mutant strain restored the capacity of the mycelium at adhering to bean leaves and at forming IC in vitro ( Figure 7C,F). It also restored the capacity of the fungus at colonizing leaves, albeit partially ( Figure 7A,D).
However, the parental mycelium then colonized the leaves, while the mutant mycelium did not ( Figure 7D). This questioned the capacity of the mutant conidia at germinating on the plant surface, the capacity of the mutant mycelium at adhering to this surface and/or the capacity of the mutant mycelium at producing infection cushions. Microscopy analysis at 2 dpi revealed that the mutant conidia had germinated and had produced mycelium at the plant surface, even more so than the parental strain ( Figure 7E). In parallel, adhesion assays in vitro showed that the mycelium produced in 24 h by the conidia of the mutant strain was not affected in adherence. On the other hand, in 48 h of hyphal development on either glass or plastic surfaces, this mycelium produced numerous hooks (precursors of infection cushions (IC)), but rare ICs when compared with the parental mycelium (Figure 7F). This suggests that BcCps1 plays a role in the development of ICs, and therefore in the penetration step of plant infection. Re-introduction of the Bccps1 gene in the mutant strain restored the capacity of the mycelium at adhering to bean leaves and at forming IC in vitro ( Figure 7C,F). It also restored the capacity of the fungus at colonizing leaves, albeit partially ( Figure 7A,D).

Discussion
Cps1-encoding genes are present in a large number of fungal species of the phyla Basidiomycota, Ascomycota, Mucoromycota, Zoopagomycota and ChitridiomycotA. However, no ortholog has been detected in Cryptomycota or Blastocladiomycota and, even in the fungal phyla where the gene is present, some species have presumably lost it. In ascomycetes, this is for example the case for the Taphrinomycotina, the Saccharomycotina, the Pezizomycetes and for some Orbiliomycetes species ( Figure S2; Table S2) [28]. On the contrary, all studied species of the Leotiomyceta order have at least one ortholog and sometimes more, due to duplications. One such duplication occurred in the common ancestor of Leotiomyceta [28] and gave rise to the Cps1 and the Cps2 paralog subfamilies (Figures S1 and S2). The Cps1 subfamily is the most conserved, and its member in B. cinerea was functionally characterized in this study. As in the other Cps1 proteins already studied in filamentous ascomycetous fungi [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], the BcCps1 protein belongs to the glycosyl transferase type 2 polysaccharide synthase family (GT2) and is supposed to contribute to the biology of the cell wall in B. cinerea.

BcCps1 Is Required for Normal Composition and Integrity of the Fungal Cell Wall
Fungal cell walls are all described as containing the well-known polysaccharides chitin and β-1,3 glucan. In some species, the presence of other glucans has also been demonstrated (β-1,6; α-1,3; mixed β-1,3/β-1,4) [57] while, in addition, yet unidentified polysaccharides are expected. An important role attributed to some of these polymers relates to the integrity of the cell wall and in the resistance of fungal cells to environmental stress. Here, we showed that the deletion of the Bccps1 gene associates with cell rupture events and the emptying of the cellular content when hyphae grow out of a medium droplet onto a solid surface. We also showed that the ∆Bccps1 mutant strain produces numerous satellite pellets in agitated liquid cultures, strongly suggesting hyphal fragmentation under these conditions. Further analysis revealed an increased sensitivity of the ∆Bccps1 strain to Congo red (cell wall stress) and a positive effect of saccharose, or sorbitol (osmoprotective agents), on its growth in a rich solid medium. At the biochemical level, the mutant's cell wall is characterized by a reduction in β-1,3 glucan. Altogether, this indicates that the BcCps1 protein is required for normal polysaccharidic composition and normal integrity of the cell wall in B. cinerea. Of note, the absence of BcCps1 seems to affect neither the cell sensitivity to hyperosmotic stress, nor the cell wall content in chitin or β-1,3-1,4 glucan (lichenan). In consistence with various profiles of cell wall polysaccharides contents in cps1 mutants of N. crassa, A. nidulans and A. fumigatus (Figure 1), all polysaccharides of the B. cinerea cell wall are therefore not disturbed in the absence of BcCps1. Concerning lichenan, its presence has not yet been reported in the cell wall of B. cinerea to our knowledge, and our results suggest that it is not produced by BcCps1. This contradicts the proposition of Fu et al. [30] but it would be consistent with the fact that the ortholog of the lichenan synthase identified in A. fumigatus is not Bccps1, but rather another gene (Bcin04g06040) in B. cinerea [5].
Fungal cell walls also contain proteins. Many of them are glycoproteins, and some are known to associate to β-1,3 glucan (Pir proteins) or to to β-1,6 glucan (GPI-anchored proteins) [57,58]. In the cell walls of ∆cps1 mutants in A. nidulans and N. crassa, the amount of glycoproteins is reduced (Figure 1). Furthermore, more proteins are detected in the surrounding medium of the N. crassa ∆cps1 mutant [30]. Here, we showed that 132 proteins up-accumulate in the exoproteome of the ∆Bccps1 mutant, while less glycoproteins (−37%) are found in its cell wall. These data suggest that proteins may not incorporate properly into the wall matrix in the absence of Cps1. Combined with the above-described changes in the polysaccharidic composition of the FCW, this makes Cps1 a protein necessary for the full construction of this structure.

BcCps1 Is Involved in Hyphal Adherence and Reveals a Two-Phase Hyphal Growth on Solid Surfaces
In all ascomycetous cps1 mutants studied so far, the radial growth of the colony is impaired (Figure 1). In B. cinerea, not only this is confirmed, but the reduction is the strongest (−90%) up to now reported. At the microscopic level, mutant conidia germinate normally on a plastic or agar surface in vitro and give rise to a young mycelium that develops with no apparent default during 24 h. Then, abnormal tufts of ramification (multibranching) or hyperbranching events occur within the mycelium, and hyphal expansion drops drastically. The deletion of the Bccps1 gene hence reveals that hyphal growth in B. cinerea seems to proceed in two phases on a solid surface after conidia germination: one initial Cps1independent phase and one subsequent Cps1-dependent expansion phase. Interestingly, an increased expression of Bccps1 was measured between 24 h, 48 h and 72 h of growth, and this suggests that BcCps1 could play an important role in the unfolding of the second phase of hyphal development in B. cinerea. As proposed by King et al. [28], Cps1 could produce a cell wall (or extracellular matrix) polysaccharide necessary for hyphal growth on solid matrices.
In A. nidulans and A. fumigatus, a decreased adherence capacity has been documented in cps1 mutants ( Figure 1). Interestingly, young mycelia produced in 24 h by conidia of the ∆Bccps1 strain exhibited no adhesion default, while explants of the mutant mycelium showed a 40% loss in adhesion to leaves (and also to plastic surfaces, data not shown). A conserved role for Cps1 in mycelial adherence might therefore be considered. Cps1 could produce a polysaccharide that directly participates in hyphal adherence, as established for α-1,3 glucan and galactosaminogalactan [59,60].
The growth of the ∆Bccps1 mutant strain is also altered in liquid cultures, but less than in solid media (−65%). Together with the reduced growth of the A. nidulans ∆cps1 mutant in liquid cultures [27], this indicates that Cps1 also plays a role in hyphal development in liquid environments. Furthermore, the liquid cultures revealed a small pellet phenotype in the ∆Bccps1 mutant that corresponds to pellets more compact, smaller and smoother than their parental counterparts. A similar phenotype is observed in the ∆cps1 mutant of the rice pathogen M. oryzae [24], and this raises the possibility of a conserved function of Cps1 during hyphal growth in liquids. Remarkably, a similar phenotype also characterizes mutants of A. nidulans and A. oryzae affected in α-1,3 glucan and/or galactosaminogalactan synthesis, the above-mentioned polysaccharides involved in surface adherence, but also involved in hyphal aggregation (self-adhesion) in liquid cultures [60]. If the ∆cps1 mutation caused a reduction or a mislocalization of these polymers in the FCW, this could explain the adherence and aggregation defects documented in B. cinerea, A. nidulans, A. fumigatus and M. oryzae. It could also be consistent with the strong up-regulation of the α-1,3 glucan synthaseencoding gene in the ∆cps1 mutant of F. graminearum [28] as a compensatory mechanism.

BcCps1 Is Involved in Conidial and Sclerotial Differentiation
Under favorable conditions, including exposition to light, the life cycle of B. cinerea ends with asexual reproduction and the dispersal of conidia propagating the fungus and the disease. Alternatively, the mycelium can differentiate sclerotia for long-period survival in soils and potential sexual reproduction. In the absence of Cps1, the production of conidia is abolished in M. oryzae and reduced in N. crassa, as well as in A. nidulans and A. fumigatus (Figure 1). Deletion of Bccps1 in B. cinerea does not impair the production of conidia, but it increases the percentage of conidia with abnormal shapes. Considering that fungal cells are mainly shaped by their cell wall, this could relate to the already discussed role of BcCps1 in cell wall composition/integrity.
Regarding the differentiation of sclerotia, BcCps1 plays a critical role, and it is noticeable that its ortholog in N. crassa plays a crucial role in protoperithecia differentiation [30]. BcCps1 is not essential to the aggregation and tangling of the aerial hyphae that form the sclerotial initials. It is not essential either to the subsequent hyphal growth and aggregation that shape and enlarge the sclerotia. However, its absence stops the maturation process before the melanization and densification of the shell. The loss of laccase activity in the mutant's secretome could partly account for this, as these enzymes are potential candidates in the melanization process [61]. Furthermore, due to the melanin granules being cross-linked to the cell wall polysaccharides [62], the role of BcCps1 in the maturation of sclerotia may again be linked to its role in the biology of the FCW.

BcCps1 Is Involved in Virulence
The loss of the BcCps1 protein associates with an incapacity of the ∆Bccps1 mutant conidia at infecting plants. In this respect, our study cumulates with the previous studies of fungal ∆cps1 mutants that report full or partial loss of virulence in five pathogenic species (Figure 1). The mutant conidia germinate into a young mycelium at the plant surface, but fail to initiate infection. This could be explained by the negative impact of the Bccps1 deletion on the production of infection cushions, organs involved in plant penetration and necrosis [13]. By contrast, some ∆Bccps1 mycelial explants can trigger, although with delay, small lesions of the plant tissues. Considering the growth defect of this mycelium, its increased fragility and sensitivity, and its reduced secretion of PCWDE, this residual capacity at resisting the defense of the host and at colonizing its tissues was unexpected. The increased secretion of some proteases and oxidoreductases might account for this.

Conclusions
Our study of Bccps1 in B. cinerea identifies this gene as an important player in the biology and life cycle of this pathogen. This gene being absent in plants, mammals and insects makes the BcCps1 protein a putative target for grey mold disease control. Its absence affects the FCW, and causes pleiotropic effects as a possible consequence. Identification of the putative polysaccharide produced by this GT2 enzyme would now be of great interest.
Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8090899/s1, Table S1: primers used in this study. Table S2: account of Cps1-like proteins in the species included in this study. Table S3: list of proteins detected in the exoproteome of the ∆Bccps1 mutant compared with the parental strain B05.10 after growth in MS liquid medium. For quantification, all unique peptides of an identified protein were included, and the total cumulative abundance was calculated by summing the abundances of all peptides allocated to the respective protein. ANOVA test was applied at the protein level. Four independent biological experiments were conducted and analyzed.  Data Availability Statement: The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the Pro-teomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD033590.