Rad1 and Rad10 Tied to Photolyase Regulators Protect Insecticidal Fungal Cells from Solar UV Damage by Photoreactivation

Beauveria bassiana serves as a main source of global fungal insecticides, which are based on the active ingredient of formulated conidia vulnerable to solar ultraviolet (UV) irradiation and restrained for all-weather application in green agriculture. The anti-UV proteins Rad1 and Rad10 are required for the nucleotide excision repair (NER) of UV-injured DNA in model yeast, but their anti-UV roles remain rarely exploredin filamentous fungi. Here, Rad1 and Rad10 orthologues that accumulated more in the nuclei than the cytoplasm of B. bassiana proved capable of reactivating UVB-impaired or UVB-inactivated conidia efficiently by 5h light exposure but incapable of doing so by 24 h dark incubation (NER) if the accumulated UVB irradiation was lethal. Each orthologue was found interacting with the other and two white collar proteins (WC1 and WC2), which proved to be regulators of two photolyases (Phr1 and Phr2) and individually more efficient in the photorepair of UVB-induced DNA lesions than either photolyase alone. The fungal photoreactivation activity was more or far more compromised when the protein–protein interactions were abolished in the absence of Rad1 or Rad10 than when either Phr1 or Phr2 lost function. The detected protein–protein interactions suggest direct links of either Rad1 or Rad10 to two photolyase regulators. In B. bassiana, therefore, Rad1 and Rad10 tied to the photolyase regulators have high activities in the photoprotection of formulated conidia from solar UV damage but insufficient NER activities in the field, where night (dark) time is too short, and no other roles in the fungal lifecycle in vitro and in vivo.


Introduction
Strong UVB (280-320 nm) and UVA (320-400 nm) irradiations in summer sunlight [1] are ubiquitous outdoor stresses that restrain all-weather applications of fungal insecticides and acaricides to protect green agriculture from arthropod pest damage [2][3][4][5]. As common active ingredients of such pesticides, fungal conidia are more vulnerable to the damage of UVB than of UVA [6,7]. The damage arises from an impairment of macromolecules in UVBabsorbed cells and an exposure of fungal cells to the oxidative stress of reactive oxygen species generated by UVA irradiation [8,9]. Thus, understanding the roles and mechanisms behind fungal anti-UV is critical for the development of an optimal application strategy enabling the protection of formulated conidia from solar UV damage and the enhancement of fungal pest control efficacy [10].
As a vital macromolecule, eukaryotic DNA is readily damaged by UV irradiation, which induces the formation of two distinctive cytotoxic photoproducts known as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) and (6-4)-pyrimidine-pyrimidone (6-4PP). The UV-induced CPD and 6-4PP DNA lesions harmful to cells [11][12][13] form through covalent linkages between adjacent bases of the DNA duplex [14], and their repair relies on two distinctive mechanisms [15]. Shorter UV-induced DNA lesions can be rapidly repaired by exposure and is also required for the precise timekeeping of the circadian clock in N. crassa [50,51] and M. robertsii [52]. A circadian day of summer features longer daytime than nighttime, which is too short for sufficient NER in the field. Recent findings have led to a hypothesis that photorepair may serve as a main mechanism of filamentous fungal resistance to solar UV and depend on the WCC-cored pathway consisting of not only photolyases but multiple RAD proteins [19]. This study seeks to test the hypothesis by the characterization of orthologous Rad1 and Rad10 in B. bassiana. Our results confirm the interactions of either Rad1 or Rad10 with both WC1 and WC2, which are proven to act as photolyase regulators, and their high activities in photoreactivation but an insufficient role of each in NER.

Recognition and Bioinformatic Analysis of Rad1 and Rad10 Orthologues
The S. cerevisiae Rad1 (NP_015303) and Rad10 (NP_013614) sequences were used as queries to identify orthologues in the NCBI databases of selected fungi by BPLASTp analysis (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast.cgi, accessed on 3 October 2022). The queries and the resultant orthologues were subjected to sequence alignment analysis and clustered with a maximum likelihood method in MEGA7 (http://www.megasoftware.net/, accessed on 3 October 2022). Conserved domains and NLS motif predictedfrom either orthologue at http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/ (accessed on 3 October 2022) and http://nls-mapper.iab. keio.ac.jp/ (accessed on 3 October 2022) were compared between B. bassiana and S. cerevisiae.

Subcellular Localization of Rad1 and Rad10
The green fluorescence protein (GFP)-tagged Rad1 and Rad10 fusion proteins were expressed in WT using the backbone vector pAN52-gfp-bar driven by Ptef1, an endogenous promoter [44]. The open reading frame (ORF) of rad1 or rad10 was cloned from the WT cDNA and inserted into the 5 -terminus of gfp (U55763) in the linearized vector using a one-step cloning kit (Vazyme, Nanjin, China). The resultant vector was integrated into WT by means of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and screened by the bar resistance to phosphinothricin (200 µg/mL). A desirable transformant (showing strong green fluorescence) from each transformation was incubated for conidiation on SDAY. Its conidia were suspended in SDBY (SDAY free of agar) for a 3-day shaking incubation at 25 • C and L:D 12:12. Hyphal samples from the cultures were stained with 4.16 mM DAPI (4 ,6 -diamidine-2 -phenylindole dihydrochloride; Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China) and visualized with laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) at the excitation/emission wavelengths of 358/460 and 488/507 nm to determine subcellular localization of Rad1-GFP and Rad10-GFP. Green fluorescence intensity was assessed from a fixed circular area moving in the cytoplasm and nucleus of each of 15 hyphal cells using ImageJ software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, accessed on 3 October 2022) to compute the nuclear versus cytoplasmic green fluorescence intensity (N/C-GFI) ratio as the nuclear accumulation level of Rad1-GFP or Rad10-GFP.
The vector pAN52-mCherry-sur [53] was modified with Ptef1 for co-localization of Rad1 and Rad10. The rad10 ORF was ligated to the 5 -terminus of mCherry (KC294599) in the modified vector, followed by transformation into the strain expressing Rad1-GFP. Transgenic colonies were screened by sur resistance to chlorimuron ethyl (10 µg/mL). A colony exhibiting strong red fluorescence was chosen for co-localization of Rad1-GFP and Rad10-mCherry by LSCM at the excitation/emission wavelengths of 488/507 and 561/610 nm, respectively.
The activity of WC1 or WC2 binding to the promoter region of phr1 or phr2 was detected in the Y1H assays based on Matchmaker ® Gold Yeast One-Hybrid System (TaKaRa, CA, USA). Briefly, DNA fragments of Pphr1 (1829 bp) and Pphr2 (1904 bp) were amplified from the WT DNA and ligated to SmaI site in pAbAi using ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The constructs pAbAi-Pphr1 and pAbAi-Pphr2 were integrated into S. cerevisiae Y1HGold by homologous recombination, yielding bait-specific reporter strains that were screened on a selective uridine-dropout (SD/-Ura) medium. Further, the amplified wc1 or wc2 ORF was ligated to pGADT7 at EcoR1/BamH1 sites using the same kit. The resultant pGADT7-wc1 and pGADT7-wc2 were transformed into the bait-specific reporter strains, respectively. The protein-DNA interaction was determined by the yeast constructs grown for 3 days at 28 • C on a synthetic dextrose medium deficient of uridine and leucine but supplemented with aureobasidin A of 500 ng/mL (SD/-Leu+AbA). The strains transformed with pGADT7-p53 and pAbAi-Pp53 were used as positive controls while the strains transformed with one or two empty vectors were used as negative controls. Yeast colonies initiated with 30 to 3000 cells were incubated at 30 • C for 3 days.

Construction and Identification of Targeted Gene Mutants
The deletion and complementation mutants of rad1, rad10, wc1, and wc2 were generated following previous protocols [44,48,49]. A partial flanking/coding DNA fragment of each target gene was deleted by transforming the constructed vector p0380-5 x-bar-3 x (x = rad1, rad10, wc1, or wc2) into the WT strain, as mentioned, for homologous recombination of its 5 and 3 coding/flanking fragments ( Figure S1A-D). The p0380-x-sur vector (x, a full-coding sequence of each target gene with flank regions) constructed for targeted gene complementation was ectopically integrated into an identified ∆x mutant using the same transformation system. The bar or sur resistance, as mentioned, was exploited to screen putative ∆x or ∆x::x colonies. Expected recombination events were identified via PCR detection of DNA samples ( Figure S1E-H) and verified by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of cDNA samples (Figure S1I-L). All paired primers used for amplification of DNA fragments and detection of each target gene are listed in Table S1. The identified ∆x and ∆x::x mutants and the parental WT strain were used in the following experiments including three independent replicates each.

Assays for Growth Rates, Conidial Yields, Stress Tolerance, and Virulence
For each of the ∆rad1 and ∆rad10 mutants and their control (WT and complementation) strains, radial growth was initiated by spotting 1 µL aliquots of a 10 6 conidia/mL suspension on SDAY, 1/4 SDAY (amended with 1/4 of each SDAY nutrient), CDA, and CDAs amended with different carbon or nitrogen sources. Incubated for 7 days at the optimal regime, each colony diameter was measured perpendicularly to each other across the center. The same method was used to initiate 7-day radial growth of each strain at 25 • C on CDA plates, which were supplemented with methyl methanesulfonate (325 µg/mL) or mitomycin C (33.4 µg/mL) for DNA-damaging stress, NaCl (0.7 M) or sorbitol (1 M) for osmotic stress, H 2 O 2 (2 mM) or menadione (0.02 mM) for oxidative stress, and Congo red (3 µg/mL) or calcofluor white (10 µg/mL) for cell wall stress. In addition, spotted SDAY or CDA plates were incubated for 7 days after exposure to UVB irradiation at 0.1 J/cm 2 (detailed in Section 2.7) and 2-day-old SDAY colonies initiated at 25 • C were exposed to a 42 • C heat shock for 3 to 9 h and then incubated at 25 • C for 5-day growth recovery, followed by estimation of colony diameters as mentioned. The measured diameters of stressed and unstressed (control) colonies were used to compute the relative growth inhibition percentage of each strain under each stress.
Conidial yield of each strain was assessed from each of three 7-day-old SDAY cultures initiated at the optimal regime by spreading 100 µL of a 10 7 conidia/mLsuspension (the same below unless specified) per plate and standardized to the number of conidia per unit area (cm 2 ) of plate culture. Conidial viability was assayed as median germination time (GT 50 ) on agar plates at 25 • C.
Standardized bioassays on Galleria mellonella larvae (4th instar) were carried out by immersing three groups of 30-40 larvae per strain in 40 mL aliquots of conidial suspension for normal cuticle infection (NCI) and injecting~500 conidia (in 5 µL of a 10 5 conidia/mL suspension) into the hemocoel of each larva in each group for cuticle-bypassing infection (CBI). The used conidia were collected directly from the SDAY cultures or impaired at the UVB dose of 0.1 J/cm 2 after collection. Suspensions of irradiated conidia were prepared by spreading 500 µL aliquots of a 2 × 10 8 conidia/mL suspension on plates overlaid with cellophane, exposing the plates to the UVB irradiation, resuspending collected conidia in 0.02% Tween 80, and standardizing the suspension to the used concentration. All grouped larvae were held at 25 • C for survival/mortality records every 12 or 24 h. Modeling analysis of the time-mortality trend in each group of larvae infected in either mode was conducted to estimate median lethal time (LT 50 , no. of days) of each strain against the model insect.

Assays for Conidial UVB Resistance and Photoreactivation Rates
Conidial UVB resistances of ∆rad1, ∆rad10, and control strains were assayed as described previously [6,7]. Briefly, 100 µL aliquots of conidial suspension were evenly smeared onto the plates of germination medium (GM; 2% sucrose, 0.5% peptone, and 1.5% agar). After 10 min drying via sterile ventilation, the plates were irradiated for less than 4 min [6] in the sample tray of a Bio-Sun ++ UV chamber (Vilber Lourmat, Marne-la-Vallée, France) at the gradient UVB doses of 0.02, 0.03, 0.07, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4, and 0.5 J/cm 2 . An error of each dose with weighted UVB wavelength of 312 nm was controlled to ≤1 µJ/cm 2 (10 -6 ) by an inset microprocessor, which automatically adjusted the irradiating wavelength and the intensity four times per second (per the manufacturer's guide). The irradiated plates were covered immediately with lids and incubated at 25 • C for 24 h in the dark. From 8 h dark incubation onwards, three fields of microscopic view per plate were microscopically examined every 2 h to gain the maximal germination rate of conidia irradiated at each UVB dose. Conidial survival indices (I s , ratios of maximal germination percentages of irradiated versus non-irradiated conidia) over the UVB doses (d) fit the equation I s = 1/[1 + exp(a + rd)] for estimation of parameters a and r. Lethal doses to inactivate 50% (LD 50 ), 75% (LD 75 ), and 95% (LD 95 ) of tested conidia were computed as indices of conidial UVB resistance by solving the fitted equation at the respective I s values of 0.5, 0.25, and 0.05.
Further, the conidia of each strain smeared onto GM plates as above were differentially impaired at the UVB doses of 0.15, 0.3,and 0.4 J/cm 2 in the Bio-Sun chamber. The irradiated plates were immediately incubated at 25 • C for the optimal 5 h [44] under white light plus 19 h in full darkness (photoreactivation) or directly for 40 h in the dark (NER). Maximal germination rate in each treatment was monitored as mentioned.

Assays for CPD and 6-4PP DNA Lesions in UVB-Impaired Cells
For each of the ∆wc1 and ∆wc2 mutants and their control strains, three 50 mL aliquots of a 10 6 conidia/mL SDBY were shaken (150 rpm) at 25 • C for 3 days. Cells from each culture were rinsed with sterile water and resuspended in 50 mL sterile water. The aliquots of 500 µL suspension were spread on cellophane-overlaid agar plates containing 0.1% yeast extract and exposed to a UVB dose of 0.4 J/cm 2 for generation of intracellular CPD and 6-4PP DNA lesions. The irradiated plates were covered with lids and incubated at 25 • C for 5 h under white light (photorepair) or in the dark (NER). A Biospin Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Bioer Technology, Hangzhou, China) was used to extract genomic DNAs from the cells incubated under light and in the dark or directly from the irradiated cells not incubated (control). Anti-CPD and anti-6-4PP antibodies (Cosmo Bio Co. Ltd., Japan) were used in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to quantify CPD and 6-4PP lesions accumulated in each DNA sample, respectively. Every 20 or 200 ng DNA was added to each well of 50 µL diluent system in a 96-well plate for quantification of CPD or 6-4P PDNA lesions following the manufacturer's guide. The optical density (OD 492 ) of each DNA dilution at 492 nm was used as an index of CPD or 6-4PP DNA lesions accumulated in the irradiated cells before and after photorepair or NER. Three independent DNA samples per strain were included in each treatment.

Transcriptional Profiling
Total RNAs were extracted with a RNAiso Plus Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) from three 3-day-old cultures of each strain grown on cellophane-overlaid SDAY plates at the optimal regime and reversely transcribed into cDNAs with a PrimeScript RT reagent kit (TaKaRa). The cDNA samples were used as templates to assess: (1) transcript levels of rad1, rad10, wc1, or wc2 in targeted gene mutants and WT for verification of targeted gene recombination events; and (2) transcript levels of 22 DNA damage repair-required genes in ∆wc1, ∆wc2, and their control strains. The qPCR analysis withpaired primers (Table S2) was performed under the action of SYBRPremix ExTaq (TaKaRa). The fungal β-actin gene was used as a reference. Relative transcript levels of analyzed genes in the mutants were computed with respect to the WT standard using a threshold-cycle (2 −∆∆Ct ) method.

Statistical Analysis
Mean N/C-GFI ratios between Rad1-GFP and Rad10-GFP were compared with Student's t test. All experimental data were subjected to one-factor analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) tests for differences among tested strains.

Domain Architecture, Localization, and Interaction of Rad1 and Rad10
The Rad1 and Rad10 orthologues found in selected fungi were clustered to phylogenetic clades or subclades generally associated with their host lineages ( Figure S2). The B. bassiana Rad1 (EJP63355) and Rad10 (EJP67637) were revealed to share higher sequence identities with the counterparts of entomopathogenic fungi (86-96% and 65-82%) than of non-entomopathogenic fungi (34-84% and 33-59%). Either Rad1 or Rad10 is different in molecular size between B. bassiana and S. cerevisiae but similar in domain architecture, as shown by the same size of ERCC4 domain (81 aa) and the similar size of Rad10 domain (114 or 118 aa), respectively ( Figure 1A). A same size of NLS motif was also predicted from the sequences of their Rad1 (10 aa) or Rad10 (31 aa) orthologues.
identities with the counterparts of entomopathogenic fungi (86-96% and 65-82%) than of non-entomopathogenic fungi (34-84% and 33-59%). Either Rad1 or Rad10 is different in molecular size between B. bassiana and S. cerevisiae but similar in domain architecture, as shown by the same size of ERCC4 domain (81 aa) and the similar size of Rad10 domain (114 or 118 aa), respectively ( Figure 1A). A same size of NLS motif was also predicted from the sequences of their Rad1 (10 aa) or Rad10 (31 aa) orthologues. The Rad1-GFP and Rad10-GFP fusion proteins expressed in the WT strain accumulated more in the nuclei than in the cytoplasm of the hyphal cells, as shown in LSCM images ( Figure 1B). The mean (±SD) N/C-GFI ratios revealed significantly more accumulation of Rad1-GFP (5.3 ± 2.4) than of Rad10-GFP (3.4 ± 1.7) in the nuclei ( Figure 1C). Moreover, GFP-tagged Rad1 and mCherry-tagged Rad10 fusion proteins co-expressed in WT merged very well in both the nuclei and cytoplasm out of hyphal vacuoles (Figure The Rad1-GFP and Rad10-GFP fusion proteins expressed in the WT strain accumulated more in the nuclei than in the cytoplasm of the hyphal cells, as shown in LSCM images ( Figure 1B). The mean (±SD) N/C-GFI ratios revealed significantly more accumulation of Rad1-GFP (5.3 ± 2.4) than of Rad10-GFP (3.4 ± 1.7) in the nuclei ( Figure 1C). Moreover, GFP-tagged Rad1 and mCherry-tagged Rad10 fusion proteins co-expressed in WT merged very well in both the nuclei and cytoplasm out of hyphal vacuoles (Figure 1D), implying a Rad1-Rad10 interaction. This implication was clarified in the Y2H assay. The constructed diploids AD-Rad1-BD-Rad10 and AD-Rad10-BD-Rad1 grew well on the quadruple-dropout plate like the positive control, whereas all negative controls (empty AD or BD) grew only on the double-dropout plate ( Figure 1E). This suggests a strong interaction between Rad1 and Rad10 in B. bassiana as seen in S. cerevisiae [54,55].

Rad1 and Rad10 Are Essential for Preventing DNA Damage but Dispensable for Asexual Cycle In Vitro
Disruption of rad1 or rad10 in WT resulted in abolished growth on the SDAY and CDA plates irradiated at the UVB dose of 0.1 J/cm 2 after inoculation ( Figure 2A). Moreover, the mutants became hypersensitive to DNA damage induced by methyl methanesulfonate and mitomycin C (Figure 2B,C).
The constructed diploids AD-Rad1-BD-Rad10 and AD-Rad10-BD-Rad1 grew well on th quadruple-dropout plate like the positive control, whereas all negative controls (empt AD or BD) grew only on the double-dropout plate ( Figure 1E). This suggests a stron interaction between Rad1 and Rad10 in B. bassiana as seen in S. cerevisiae [54,55].

Rad1 and Rad10 Are Essential for Preventing DNA Damage but Dispensable for Asexual Cycle In Vitro
Disruption of rad1 or rad10 in WT resulted in abolished growth on the SDAY an CDA plates irradiated at the UVB dose of 0.1 J/cm 2 after inoculation (Figure 2A). More over, the mutants became hypersensitive to DNA damage induced by methyl me thanesulfonate and mitomycin C ( Figure 2B,C).  In the standardized bioassays, NCI and CBI resulted in similar LT 50 (±SD) estimates indicative of virulence (5.28 ± 0.30 days via NCI, 3.92 ± 0.18 days via CBI, n = 15) for all tested strains ( Figure 2D). In contrast, the mutants' virulence was greatly attenuated by inoculation with conidia impaired at 0.1 J/cm 2 for NCI or CBI ( Figure 2E). The LT 50 means via NCI and CBI were 5.50 (±0.24) and 4.56 (±0.15) days (n = 9) for the three control strains but prolonged to 8.02 (±0.37) and 6.60 (±0.53) days (n =3) for ∆rad1 and 8.98 (±0.30) and 8.20 (±0.18) days (n = 3) for ∆rad10 ( Figure 2F), respectively. The mutants' hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging UVB and chemical agents indicated essential roles for Rad1 and Rad10 in preventing B. bassiana from DNA damage.
Compared to the control strains, however, the ∆rad1 and ∆rad10 mutants showed insignificant or marginal changes in radial growth on different media ( Figure S3A) and on CDA or SDAY under osmotic, oxidative, cell perturbing, and thermal stresses ( Figure S3B). Nor did they display any defect in conidiation at the optimal regime ( Figure S3C) or in conidial viability assessed as GT 50 at 25 • C ( Figure S3D). Apparently, Rad1 and Rad10 were dispensable for the normal asexual cycle in vitro of B. bassiana.
Moreover, the control strains' conidia irradiated at the UVB doses of 0.15, 0.3, and 0.4 J/cm 2 were photoreactivated by 100%, 95.8% (±3.9), and 87.1% (±2.5), respectively, via 5 h light plus 19 h dark incubation at 25 • C ( Figure 3C,D). The photoreactivation rates of conidia irradiated at the gradient doses diminished to 25.3%, 13.3%,and 3.3% for ∆rad1 and 24%,14%, and 4.3% for ∆rad10, respectively. However, the control strains' conidia exposed to the high dose of 0.4 J/cm 2 had no germination at all after a 24h dark incubation for NER ( Figure 3A,C) but were reactivated by 26.9% (±4.7) (n = 9) when the dark incubation was prolonged to 40 h ( Figure 3C,E). The 40h dark incubation also resulted in 100% and 51.1% (±4.6) germination of the control strains' conidia exposed to 0.15 and 0.3 J/cm 2 , respectively, but only~3% germination of the mutants' conidia impaired at the low dose ( Figure 3E) The UVB LD 50 was reduced by 79% or 80% in the ∆rad1 or ∆rad10 mutant relative to the control strains. This reduction was much greater than those observed in the previous ∆phr1 (38%) and ∆phr2 (19%) mutants [44], highlighting the greater role of either Rad1 or Rad10 than of either photolyase in conidial UVB resistance and also revealing an existance of NER activity in Rad1 or Rad10. The photoreactivation rates of the ∆rad1 and ∆rad10 mutants' conidia inactivated at 0.4 J/cm 2 were lower or much lower than those seen in the previous ∆phr1 (7%) and ∆phr2 (37%) mutants' conidia inactivated at 0.5 J/cm 2 [44]. These data demonstrated that Rad1 and Rad10 played essential roles in the photoreactivation of UVBimpaired or UVB-inactivated conidia. Their anti-UVB roles and photoreactivation activities were both greater than those of Phr1 and Phr2 characterized previously in B. bassiana. The NER activity of either Rad1 or Rad10 was observed in the control strains'conidia at the end of 24h dark incubation after exposure to ≤0.35 J/cm 2 but not detectable after exposure to 0.4 J/cm 2 unless the dark incubation exceeded 24 h, which is far beyond the nighttime of a circadian day. Therefore, Rad1 and Rad10 protect B. bassiana from solar UVB damage by photoreactivation. Their NER activities were seemingly extant but hardly sufficient for reactivation of UVB-imapred B. bassiana conidia under field conditions due to too short night (dark) time.

Interactions of Rad1 and Rad10 with WC1 and WC2 as Photolyase Regulators
Photoreactivation relies on the photorepair of UVB-induced CPD and 6-4PP DNA lesions by Phr1 and Phr2 in B. bassiana [44] or by WC1 and WC2 that interact with both Phr1 and Phr2 in M. robertsii [49]. Thus, Y2H assays were carried out to reveal the possi-

Interactions of Rad1 and Rad10 with WC1 and WC2 as Photolyase Regulators
Photoreactivation relies on the photorepair of UVB-induced CPD and 6-4PP DNA lesions by Phr1 and Phr2 in B. bassiana [44] or by WC1 and WC2 that interact with both Phr1 and Phr2 in M. robertsii [49]. Thus, Y2H assays were carried out to reveal the possible links of Rad1 and Rad10 to WC1/2 or Phr1/2 required for DNA photorepair. In the assays, either Rad1 or Rad10 was proven to interact with both WC1 and WC2 ( Figure 4A) but to not interact with Phr1 or Phr2 ( Figure S4A-D). There was no sign of an interaction between WC1 and Phr1 or Phr2 ( Figure S4E) or between WC2 and Phr1 or Phr2 ( Figure S4F). Subsequent Y1H assays revealed the activity of either WC1 or WC2 binding to the promoter regions of both phr1 and phr2 ( Figure 4B). The detected DNA-binding activities suggest that WC1 and WC2 serve as regulators of two DNA photorepair-dependent photolyases. assays, either Rad1 or Rad10 was proven to interact with both WC1 and WC2 ( Figure 4A) but to not interact with Phr1 or Phr2 ( Figure S4A-D). There was no sign of an interaction between WC1 and Phr1 or Phr2 ( Figure S4E) or between WC2 and Phr1 or Phr2 ( Figure  S4F). Subsequent Y1H assays revealed the activity of either WC1 or WC2 binding to the promoter regions of both phr1 and phr2 ( Figure 4B). The detected DNA-binding activities suggest that WC1 and WC2 serve as regulators of two DNA photorepair-dependent photolyases.  Next, ELISAs with anti-CPD and anti-6-4PP antibodies were conducted to assess the accumulated CPD and 6-4PP lesions in the DNA samples isolated from irradiated hyphal cells of ∆wc1 and ∆wc2 mutants. The UVB irradiation at 0.4 J/cm 2 resulted in similar levels of CPD lesions (control in Figure 4C) and differential levels of 6-4PP lesions (control in Figure 4D) in the DNA samples of ∆wc1, ∆wc2, and their control strains. After 5h light exposure for photorepair, the amount of CPD and 6-4PP lesions were lowered by 34-44% and 30-43% in the control strains' cells, respectively. However, such photorepair led to insignificant changes in CPD lesions and slight decreases in 6-4PP lesions in the ∆wc1 and ∆wc2 mutants' cells. After 5h dark incubation for NER, CPD lesions decreased in the DNA samples of the control strains slightly more than of ∆wc1 and ∆wc2, while 6-4PP lesions were moderately reduced in all tested strains except ∆wc2, whose 6-4PP level was not affected in comparison to the control. These data demonstrate that, in B. bassiana, the role of either WC1 or WC2 in photorepairing both CPD and 6-4PP DNA lesions is beyond that of Phr1 specific to CPD or Phr2 specific to 6-4PP in B. bassiana [44] and of WC2 specific to CPD or WC1 specific to 6-4PP in M. robertsii [49].
The role of WC1 or WC2 in the transcriptional activation of phr1 and ph2 was verified by the nearly abolished expression of both phr1 and phr2 in either ∆wc1 or ∆wc2 ( Figure 4E), providing answers to why the two mutants were severely impaired in their capability of photorepairing both CPD and 6-4PP DNA lesions. Moreover, half of the other 20 genes homologous to those required for the yeast NER [27] were markedly repressed by 50-90% (1-to 10-fold) in ∆wc1 or ∆wc2, suggesting active roles of WC1 and WC2 in transcriptional mediation of multiple anti-UV genes in B. bassiana.

Discussion
In B. bassiana, Rad1 and Rad10 were proven to co-localize in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm for nucleocytoplasmic shuttling and interact with each other as elucidated in S. cerevisiae [53,54]. The extraordinary anti-UV roles of Rad1 and Rad10 rely on their high photoreactivation activities and hence are distinguished from the dependence of the budding yeast orthologues' anti-UV roles on NER [33][34][35][36]. The photoreactivation activities of Rad1 and Rad10 are speculated to arise from the interactions of each with both WC1 and WC2, which were proven to regulate expression of phr1 and phr2 and enable the photorepair of both CPD and 6-4PP DNA lesions, although their interactions with both photolyases were not evidenced in B. bassiana as shown previously in M. robertsii [49]. At the transcriptional level, importantly, both phr1 and phr2 were nearly abolished in the ∆wc1 or ∆wc2 mutant. This is different from the abolished expression of phr2 in the absence of wc1 and of phr1 in the absence of wc2 in M. robertsii [49]. Thus, the present ∆wc1 and ∆wc2 mutants were severely compromised in photorepair activity for both CDP and 6-4PP lesions, unlike the previous M. robertstii ∆wc1 and ∆wc2 mutants that were unable to photorepair 6-4PP and CPD DNA lesions, respectively [49]. The present and previous studies suggest that WC1 and WC2 play key roles in the photorepair of UVB-induced DNA lesions no matter whether each acts as a mediator of phr1 and phr2 in B. bassiana or interacts with both Phr1 and Phr2 in M. robertsii. The protein-protein interactions detected in this study suggest direct links of either Rad1or Rad10 to both WC1 and WC2 as photolyase regulators. Therefore, either Rad1 or Rad10 tied to two photolyase regulators displayed much higher UVB resistance and photoreactivation activity than a single photolyase or photolyase mediator in B. bassiana, although the involved mechanism remains to be explored.
In the present study, Rad1 and Rad10 did exhibit NER activities for UVB-impaired B. bassiana cells like those of their yeast orthologues for UVC-impaired cells [33][34][35][36]. This is well demonstrated by the differential reactivation rates of the control strains' conidia incubated for 24-40 h in the dark after exposure to the UVB doses of ≤0.35 J/cm 2 and the abolished germination of the ∆rad1 and ∆rad10 mutants' conidia incubated in the same fashion after exposure to ≤0.15 J/cm 2 . However, the control strains' conidia impaired at the UVB dose of 0.4 J/cm 2 were unable to be reactivated within 24 h of dark incubation, in contrast to their high photoreactivation rates of~87%. This highlights an insufficient NER activity for either Rad1 or Rad10 in the field, where a much shorter nighttime is available for the reactivation of formulated conidia exposed to solar UVB irradiation that accumulates tõ 2.5 J/cm 2 during the daytime [10]. Therefore, either Rad1 or Rad10 tied to two photolyase regulators protects B. bassiana from solar UVB damage mainly by photoreactivation.
In conclusion, Rad1 and Rad10 play essential roles in B. bassiana's response and adaptation to solar UV irradiation in sunlight. The essential roles of Rad1 and Rad10 in preventing insecticidal fungal cells from solar UVB damage rely upon their high photoreactivation activities, whichcould have arisen from interactions of either with both WC1 and WC2 to govern photorepair via thetranscriptional mediation of both phr1 and phr2, and hence are distinguished from a dependence of the yeast orthologues' anti-UV roles on NER. The NER activity of Rad1 or Rad10 is extant in B. bassiana, as known in the budding yeast [27], but hardlysufficientin the field where the dark (night) time available for NER is too short. These findings demonstrate a novel scenario for Rad1 and Rad10 to protect filamentous fungal cells from solar UV damage and provide robust evidence for the hypothesis regarding the dependence of filamentous fungal adaptation to solar UV irradiation on the WCC-cored pathway that comprises not only one or two photolyases but also multiple anti-UV RAD proteins [19], which warrants further study. However, Rad1 and Rad10 have no other role in the lifecycle in vitro and in vivo of B. bassiana.

Supplementary Materials:
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8111124/s1, Table S1: Paired primers used for manipulation and detection of target genes in B. bassiana; Table S2: Paired primers used for the qPCR analyses of target genes in B. bassiana; Figure S1: Generation and identification of rad1, rad10, wc1, and wc2 mutants in B. bassiana; Figure

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.