Next Article in Journal
Role of Selected miRNAs as Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Diseases, Including Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Infarction and Atherosclerosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Zebrafish as a New Tool in Heart Preservation Research
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Body Size during Early Growth Are Independently Associated with Arterial Properties in Early Childhood
Previous Article in Special Issue
From Stripes to a Beating Heart: Early Cardiac Development in Zebrafish
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCDD
Volume 8
Issue 2
10.3390/jcdd8020021
jcdd-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Lymphatic System in Zebrafish Heart Development, Regeneration and Disease Modeling

by
Xidi Feng
1,†,
Stanislao Travisano
1,†,
Caroline A. Pearson
2,
Ching-Ling Lien
1,3,4,* and
Michael R. M. Harrison
5,6,*
1
The Saban Research Institute of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA
2
Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Development, Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA
3
Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
4
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
5
Cardiovascular Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA
6
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2021, 8(2), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd8020021
Submission received: 23 December 2020 / Revised: 10 February 2021 / Accepted: 11 February 2021 / Published: 19 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zebrafish Heart Development, Regeneration, and Disease Modelling)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Heart disease remains the single largest cause of death in developed countries, and novel therapeutic interventions are desperately needed to alleviate this growing burden. The cardiac lymphatic system is the long-overlooked counterpart of the coronary blood vasculature, but its important roles in homeostasis and disease are becoming increasingly apparent. Recently, the cardiac lymphatic vasculature in zebrafish has been described and its role in supporting the potent regenerative response of zebrafish heart tissue investigated. In this review, we discuss these findings in the wider context of lymphatic development, evolution and the promise of this system to open new therapeutic avenues to treat myocardial infarction and other cardiopathologies.

1. Introduction

1.1. The Lymphatic System: Discovery and Functions

In the 5th-century BC, Hippocrates described the presence of nodes containing a milky fluid (chyle) in specific subcutaneous and deep organ regions of the body [1]. Through the gallant efforts of a collection of anatomists, including Thomas Bartholin, Olaus Rudbeck and George Joyliffe, the “lymphatic vessels (vasa lymphatica)” were defined [1]. However, it was not until the 18th century, with the work of Mascagni and others, that it was appreciated that these lymph-containing vessels and nodes are an integral part of a network, which extends from blind-ended lymphatic capillaries (or initial lymphatics) to collecting lymphatic vessels that eventually connect to the blood circulatory system. In comparison to the blood circulatory system, understanding the role and development of the lymphatic system has been slow. This is in part due to the network being delicate and largely invisible in comparison to the obvious sphygmic blood circulatory system. The term lymph was coined to reflect this property coming from the Greek Nymph, a creature associated with clear streams and the Roman deity Lympha, meaning spring of clear water [1]. Even with the evolution of microscopy investigation, studies on the lymphatic system remained stubbornly hindered by a paucity of good molecular markers and labels. Nonetheless, just as blood vasculature is essential for the supply of oxygen and nutrients in addition to the removal of waste, the lymphatic vasculature also provides vital support of healthy tissue. As the range of techniques and technologies to study the lymphatic vasculature continues to expand, so does our understanding of the unique and critical roles this system plays in tissue homeostasis and disease [2].
The lymphatic system provides a unidirectional conduit for the essential flow of fluid from the tissue interstitium back to the circulatory system. This fluid regulation is absolutely critical, and malformation (primary lymphedema) or disruption (secondary lymphedema) of lymphatic vessels results in disabling swelling of the tissue [3,4]. This lymph fluid is rich in plasma proteins and also contains immune cells and antigens. Through the various afferent lymphatics, lymph nodes are exposed to intact or degraded microorganisms and toxic stimuli [5]. These must be removed from the fluid before being returned to the blood flow, and recent studies suggest a population of neutrophils and macrophages in the lymphatic system prevent the systemic spread of tissue pathogens [6,7]. In addition to these innate immune cells, the lymphatic vasculature plays a critical role in supporting adaptive immune responses. Immune cells that ingest foreign antigens are brought into contact with lymphocytes in the node where they present antigens to activate the adaptive responses [5]. The lymphatic vessels are not just a passive conduit that is homogenous throughout the body, but they also have tissue-specific roles, including the active absorption of lipids and vitamins. Gut villi lymphatic vessels, called lacteals, take up dietary-fats as triglyceride particles known as chylomicrons packaged by the gut enterocytes [8]. These are then transported to the systemic blood system via collecting vessels and the thoracic duct [8]. As a result, lacteal control of lipid absorption has been implicated in obesity and its sequelae, including the impact on heart disease and function [9,10]. However, as we will discuss in this review, the lymphatic system also has an immerging direct role in supporting cardiovascular health and disease.

1.2. The Evolution of the Lymphatic System

Most invertebrates have an open circulatory system and no distinction between a lymphatic and blood system or their respective functions [11]. Vertebrates have a range of lymphatic system features, including lymphatic vessels, lymph nodes, lymphoid organs and tissues that appear to become increasingly distinct and specialized [12]. Jawless and cartilaginous fish lack lymphatic vessels; however, some thin-walled sinuses provide a conduit for extravascular fluid back into veins in these lower vertebrates [11]. In other vertebrates, lymphatic vasculature has contractile regions, which actively aid the flow of lymph into the venous circulation [11,13]. So-called lymph hearts have been identified in lungfish, amphibians, reptiles and some flightless birds. They are typically found at the junction between lymphatic and venous systems and have been lost in higher vertebrates [11,13]. A lymphatic system that often lacks a lymph heart similar to that of mammals is found in other species of bony fish (teleosts) [11]. However, the connection of this lymphatic system to the blood circulation appears to vary across teleosts species and organ systems. In trout and glassfish, an arterial connection to the blood system has been described, and the fluid of these secondary vasculature systems can become perfused with blood under hypoxic conditions [14]. Zebrafish have been shown to have an extensive lymphatic system throughout the body, and analyses of the zebrafish vasculature system suggest it shares many conserved anatomical features with the mammalian system [15,16]. The zebrafish system has bicuspid valves and a venous connection but lacks nodes [15,17]. The possibility that this lymphatic system also retains the ability to be perfused under extreme conditions has been contested [18,19,20,21]. Reflecting the systems increasing specialization, it is likely that a spectrum of blood and lymphatic vasculature interconnectedness exists across teleosts species. Nonetheless, the zebrafish has provided invaluable insight into the molecular regulation of lymphatic development and provides a fascinating evolutionary nexus to gain a deep understanding of lymphatic function in disease.

1.3. The Zebrafish Lymphatic System

The majority of research has focused on zebrafish lymphatic development during the embryonic stage, taking advantage of various transgenic and tracing tools and body transparency. Lymphangiogenesis of the trunk lymphatic, facial lymphatic and intestinal lymphatic network has been well characterized in zebrafish embryos. The lymphangioblasts of trunk lymphatic vessels are derived from the posterior cardinal vein and migrate to the dorsal myoseptum to become parachordal lymphangioblasts by 2 days post-fertilization (dpf) [16,22,23,24]. Those lymphangioblasts migrate along intersomitic arteries dorsally and ventrally, forming intersomitic lymphatic vessels. The fish trunk lymphatic vasculature continues to develop to form the thoracic duct under the dorsal aorta and the dorsal longitudinal lymphatic vessel along the dorsal longitudinal anastomotic vessel by 5 dpf [15,16].
The development of facial lymphatic vessels starts from the budding of the lymphangioblasts from the common cardinal vein forming the facial lymphatic sprout (FLS) at 36 h post fertilization (hpf) [25,26]. The FLS migrate along the primary head sinus (PHS) towards the head area. The formation of facial lymphatic vessels is not from a single source of lymphangioblasts. As the FLS migrates, lymphanigoblasts originating from the PHS and the ventral aorta join the FLS, making up a complex facial lymphatic network together.
The origin of intestinal lymphatics has not been identified. There is a large lymphatic vessel associated with the entire zebrafish intestine [26,27], indicating the intestinal lymphatics may also play a role in lipid transporting as in mammals. Unlike trunk lymphatic vessels that migrate along arteries, intestinal lymphatic vessels have been found to form along both arteries and veins. This suggests that there may be tissue-specific guidance cues that guide lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) migration.
Although the development of the lymphatic system is well-studied in zebrafish embryos, the functional studies of lymphatic vessels in regeneration and disease models in different organs are in their infancy. In this review, we will discuss the recent work on zebrafish cardiac lymphatic vessels in heart regeneration and the implications of this for our understanding of the role of lymphatic vessels in heart disease.

2. The Development of the Lymphatic System

2.1. Venous and Non-Venous Origins

The lymphatic vasculature includes a network of LECs found in close proximity to, but separate from, the blood vasculature [28]. After carrying out ink-injection experiments in pig embryos, Florence Sabin hypothesized that the majority of lymphatic vessels bud off from the endothelium of the veins and that these primitive lymphatics then spread throughout the entire embryo body to create the lymphatic network. However, after injecting along the aorta, she also concluded that, despite budding from veins, the deep lymphatics follow arteries [29]. Cell lineage studies and grafting experiments in birds validated different sources of the lymphatic vascular system. The deeper parts of the jugular lymph sacs originate from the jugular segments of the cardinal veins and the superficial, dermal lymphatics from local lymphangioblasts in the dermatomes, while the LECs of the lymph heart is of somitic origin [30].
The first cardiac lymphatic described in the human embryo grows from two different plexuses. The first one near the left jugular lymph sac, elongating between the pulmonary trunk and the aorta and following the right coronary artery. The second plexus, described as the main one, terminates in the right jugular sac and follows the left coronary artery around embryonic week eight [31]. This is in contradiction to the mouse, in which the cardiac lymphatic vessels follow the course of the cardiac veins rather than the coronary arteries [32]. In zebrafish, the development of the cardiac lymphatics occurs during late juvenile to early adult stages after two months post-fertilization (mpf) when coronary arteries, not veins, provide a scaffold for the elongation of the lymphatic vessels and the expansion of the network [33,34]. This similarity between zebrafish and human cardiac lymphatic development could represent an ancestral mechanism of essential guidance cues for the cardiac lymphatic endothelium, which has been altered across mammalian species [35].
The lymphatic vasculature is thought to form exclusively by sprouting from embryonic veins (lymphangiogenesis). Lineage tracing experiments in mice embryos demonstrated that the lymphatic system has largely venous origins [36]. Time-lapse imaging in developing zebrafish embryos demonstrated that this process is well-conserved and that at least the main thoracic duct-like vessel arises embryonically from primitive veins [16]. However, the discovery of alternative non-venous origin(s) of LECs in mammals that contribute to the lymphatic vasculature of the skin [37], mesentery [38], and heart [32,39,40] has changed the understanding of the mechanisms of embryonic lymphatic vessel development. Furthermore, evidence of a non-venous lymphatic progenitor, named “ventral aorta lymphangioblast” (VA-L), was found to give rise to facial lymphatic in zebrafish, suggesting that the origin and development of lymphatic vessels is tissue context-dependent [41].

2.2. Molecular Mechanism of LEC Identity

The equilibrium between endothelial cell fate regulators, Notch, Coup-TFII (Nr2f2), and Prox1 may play a critical role in the specification of endothelial cell (EC) fate during vascular development and arteriovenous-lymphatic cell fate specification [42]. Notch signaling promotes arterial EC differentiation, while in venous ECs, Notch activity is repressed by the COUP-TFII orphan nuclear receptor to maintain the vein identity [43]. The specification of the LECs in mammals is dependent on PROX1, a key transcriptional factor also crucial for maintaining the lymphatic endothelial identity [44,45]. Transcription factors Sox18 [46], CoupTFII [47], Gata2 [48,49], and Hhex [50] have been found to regulate Prox1 expression in mouse LECs.
LEC progenitors relocate from the cardinal vein through paracrine action of VEGF-C expressed by the neighboring mesenchyme to form the primitive lymph sacs [51,52]. LECs express VEGFR2 and VEGFR3, as well as the co-receptor neuropilin 2 (NRP2) [52,53]. It was also demonstrated that VEGF-C and VEGF-D act through VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR-3) to induce lymphangiogenesis [54,55]. LYVE-1, one of the proteins expressed in mature LECs is also expressed in a subset of ECs from the large central veins and provides the first signal of lymphatic endothelial competence [56,57].
Similar to mammals, venous-derived lymphatic progenitors in zebrafish can be detected with prox1a expression [22,24], and lymphatic sprouting is reliant on vegfr3 (known as flt4 in zebrafish) [15,58]. However, the functionally related transcription factors Coup-TFII (Nr2f2) and Sox18 were found to be dispensable for lymphatic specification in zebrafish, suggesting that transcriptional regulation of lymphatic commitment may have diverged somewhat between zebrafish and mice [59]. However, it is not known if other Nr2f factors can compensate for the loss of Nr2f2.

3. The Development of Cardiac Lymphatic System in Zebrafish

A cardiac lymphatic vessel system in adult zebrafish has been identified [33,34,60] (Table 1). The zebrafish cardiac lymphatic vessels express common LEC markers discussed above, including prox1a, lyve1b, flt4 and also mrc1a and stab1 [33,34,60]. When cardiac LECs migrate, the very first 1–5 tip cells are primarily labeled by flt4 [34]. Unlike mammals that develop their cardiac lymphatic vessels at embryonic stages, lymphatic vessels are found to develop in the zebrafish post-embryonically [33,34]. The zebrafish cardiac lymphatic vessels arise from ventral facial lymphatics, which migrate along the ventral aorta [34]. The cardiac lymphatic vessel sprouts are visible at the tip of bulbus arteriosus (BA) at 21–28 DPF before any coronary vasculature development on the zebrafish heart ventricle has occurred [33,34].
The emergence of cardiac lymphatic vessels on the heart has been shown to be correlated with the heart rate increase during the larval to the juvenile transition [34]. Reducing heart rate with the β-blocker Atenolol attenuates cardiac lymphatic sprouts on the BA and impacts the BA lymphatic branch. The BA is the fish cardiac outflow tract with a special thick-wall chamber to adjust the blood flow pressure from the fish ventricle [61]. The sprouts on the BA continue to develop and expand to form an extensive lymphatic network by eight weeks post-fertilization (wpf) [33,34]. The cardiac lymphatic vessels on the BA remain stable and do not bud from this until young adult stages when the LECs emerge onto the heart ventricle around 12–16 wpf (Figure 1a,b). These cells migrate and form vessels along the main coronary arteries, verified by dll4, kdrl, flt1, and cxcr4a expression, and also within subepicardial fat tissue [33,34]. The functional significance of this expansion into adipocytes is not known, but interestingly an upregulation of lipid metabolism genes occurs in cardiac lymphatic defective zebrafish, indicating that lymphatic vessels in zebrafish may also have a role in lipid flux in cardiac tissue [60]. Zebrafish cardiac lymphatic vessels do not appear to have open connections with the blood vasculature in resting states, as confirmed by intravascular injection [34]. However, if such connections exist and open under stress remains to be determined.
The development of zebrafish cardiac lymphatic vessels is dependent on Vegfc-Flt4 signaling [33,34,60] (Table 1). The deletion of the flt4 receptor completely blocks the emergence of cardiac LECs on both BA and heart ventricles [34]. Since vegfc mutation is embryonic lethal in zebrafish, cardiac lymphatic vessel dependence on Vegfc was characterized in vegfc heterozygotes. The reduction of Vegfc ligand dramatically affected the lymphatic coverage and branching on BA. The sprouts and growth were reduced in the vegfc heterozygotes [34] (Table 1). Similar results were observed in hypomorphic vegfc mutants on a vegfd mutant background [60]. Cardiac lymphatic vessels were still detectable on the BA in zebrafish with either one functional vegfc or vegfd allele but lacking on heart ventricles of these zebrafish. In hypomorphic vegfc and amorphic vegfd double mutants, the cardiac lymphatic vessels were absent on both BA and heart ventricles [60]. In order to investigate the role of Vegfc signaling in cardiac lymphatic vessel extension in isolation of the more systemic effects on lymphatic development at earlier stages, Harrison et al. blocked the Vegfc signaling by a heat-inducible expression of soluble Flt4 (sFlt4) receptor [33]. The induction of sflt4 after the establishment of cardiac lymphatic vessels on BA resulted in no lymphatic vessel formation on the zebrafish ventricle. This indicates that the ventricular extension of the lymphatic vessels specifically requires Vegfc signaling and addition to any prior requirement in the specification. The coronary vessels are also required for normal cardiac lymphatic vessel growth providing a scaffold that can promote the extension of the lymphatic vessels onto the ventricle [33,34]. Phenylhydrazine hydrochloride (PHZ)-induced coronary vasculature overgrowth also promoted cardiac lymphatic development in zebrafish [34]. In contrast, in cxcr4a mutants without normal coronary vasculature, the growth of cardiac lymphatic vessels was also blocked on the ventricles [33,34]. Notably, the VFL and cardiac lymphatic vessels on the BA did not show obvious defects in mutants, indicating that the lack of cardiac lymphatic vessels extension onto the heart ventricle is mainly due to the loss of coronary vasculature [33,34].

4. The Role of the Cardiac Lymphatic System in Heart Homeostasis, Disease, and Regeneration

4.1. Roles of Lymphatic Vessels in Cardiovascular Disease

The lymphatic vessels play a prominent role in lipid metabolism. Intestinal lymphatics take up dietary lipids in the form of lipoprotein particles known as chylomicrons to transport them to the bloodstream [62]. Furthermore, lymphatic endothelium is a passive exchange perimeter indispensable for the transport of cholesterol [63]. Although vascular smooth muscle cells are the major cell type responsible for plaque formation in murine models of atherosclerosis, contributing to almost 70% of all plaque cells [64], the hypothesis that atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the arterial wall has gained widespread acceptance [65]. Elevated serum cholesterol levels and hypertension are very well-known risk factors for cardiovascular disease [66]. Despite the fact that blood vessels are more frequent than lymphatics in the collagenous outside (adventitia) surrounding a coronary plaque, the lymphatic vessels are highly present in the inner layers (intima and media) of progressive atherosclerotic lesions of coronary arteries and their growth is associated with areas characterized by scattered calcium deposits and cholesterol crystals [67]. In addition, it has been shown that the specific blockage of the VEGFR-3 decreases lymphatic vessel activation and local cardiac inflammation after transplantation and could be used as a novel lymphatic vessel–targeted immunomodulatory therapy [68]. A better understanding of the cardiac lymphatic system may offer new possibilities for therapeutic interventions in the future.
The blockage of coronary arteries by an atherosclerotic plaque results in the death of surrounding cardiac muscle in events known as myocardial infarction (MI). The necrotic tissue will further cause acute inflammation response, edema and tissue remodeling at the infarcted site, leading to fibrotic scar, arrhythmia and eventually heart failure [69]. Recently, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated the importance of cardiac lymphatic vessels in MI. The lymphangiogenesis at the infarcted area has been observed in artery ligation induced MI mice [32] and rats [70] and in post-MI human patient samples [71]. It has been shown that cardiac lymphatic vasculature has a protective role in post-MI recovery in mice [72,73,74]. The blockage of VEGF-C signaling by soluble decoy VEGFR3 (sVEGFR3) results in impaired morphology of cardiac lymphatic vessels [72]. The survival rate in sVEGFR3 mice after MI was dramatically reduced compared to wildtype (WT) controls. Further analysis revealed an increase in scar size and intramyocardial hemorrhages in sVEGFR3 mice. Furthermore, the scar composition measured by non-invasive MRI in sVEGFR3 mice was found different from that of WT controls. Apelin (APLN), the ligand for the G-protein-coupled APJ receptor, is important for lymphatic vasculature maturation [75]. The knockout of apelin in mice affected the cell–cell junction integrity in LECs and resulted in dilated lymphatic vessels [73]. Without healthy cardiac lymphatic vasculature, apelin knockout mice suffered a more serious inflammation response after MI.
One of the important functions of lymphatic vessels is immune cell clearance at the inflammation site, which has been shown to be essential for cardiac function after MI [74]. Lyve-1 deletion in mice did not affect the overall development of lymphatic vessels [76] but was deleterious to leukocyte docking [77]. The Lyve-1 mutant mice with defective immune cell clearance exhibited more fibrotic tissue and reduced percentage LV ejection fraction and stroke volume in the hearts after MI [74].
Besides its physiologic function in MI, the cardiac lymphatic vessels also secrete signal molecules in regulating heart repair. Lui et al. have shown that Reelin (RELN), an extracellular matrix protein mainly expressed by cardiac LECs, regulates heart growth and promotes cardiomyocyte (CM) proliferation during development in mice hearts [78]. During heart repair in neonatal mice, Reln expression was highly induced at the injury site [78]. The deletion of RELN diminished the heart repair with increased scar size and reduced heart function [78]. Consistent with its role in heart development, CM proliferation was reduced and CM apoptosis elevated in Reln mutants after MI. Together these studies suggest cardiac lymphatic vessels have a supportive role in post-MI recovery.
Therapeutic induction of cardiac lymphangiogenesis by VEGF-C appears to have a beneficial role in MI. The application of VEGF-C promoted lymphangiogenesis and improved cardiac function in both rats [70] and mice [32] after MI. In VEGF-C-treated rats, immune cell clearance was increased, and cardiac edema and collagen deposition were decreased compared to controls [70]. The potential roles of cardiac lymphatic vessels in heart disease and regeneration are summarized in Figure 2.

4.2. The Function of Cardiac Lymphatics in Zebrafish Heart Regeneration

Compared to mammals, zebrafish have the amazing capacity to fully regenerate heart tissue after injury, making it an ideal model to study the function of cardiac lymphatic vessels in heart regeneration [79]. Cardiac lymphatics have been shown to have distinct responses in different injury models [33,34]. After amputation, few hearts had limited cardiac lymphatic vessel growth into the wound area during heart regeneration [33,60]. The amputation has less inflammation and only minor collagen/fibrin deposition due to clean removal of the cardiac tissue. In contrast, a dramatic lymphangiogenesis response was induced in zebrafish hearts after cryoinjury, with a large number of lymphatic vessels migrating into the wound area and forming a network with increased branches and enlarged vessel diameter [33,34]. Compared to amputation, cryoinjury is a more complex heart regeneration model, which incorporates components of necrosis and inflammation, with injured tissue and ECM persisting in the wound area. A similar response occurs with injury to the fin suggesting necrotic tissue is important for neo-lymphatic growth after injury [60]. The lymphangiogenic response during heart regeneration is also regulated by Vegfc-Flt4 signaling. Vegfc expression in zebrafish heart became undetectable after 14 days post-amputation (dpa) while still remaining in the heart wound area after 42 days post-cryoinjury (dpc) [33]. In addition, cardiac lymphatic vessel growth was completely absent in flt4 mutants and highly reduced in vegfc hets after cryoinjury [34]. Consistent with this lymphangiogenic response, cardiac lymphatic vessels also show important roles in heart regeneration after cryoinjury. In the hearts with defective cardiac lymphatic vessel development, heart regeneration after cryoinjury was also impacted compared to WT controls; this was not seen in the heart without cardiac lymphatic vessels after amputation [33,34,60]. The difference in zebrafish heart regeneration after amputation and cryoinjury suggests that cryoinjury may be a more suitable injury model to study the functions of cardiac lymphatic vessels since there are server inflammation and necrotic tissue at infarctional sites in post-MI human hearts [69].
The functions of zebrafish cardiac lymphatic vessels in cryoinjury appear to include homeostasis maintenance and immune cell clearance. The cardiac lymphatic vessels were able to absorb intramyocardial injected Qdots (<10 nm diameter) and transport mpx+ neutrophils recruited after cryoinjury [33]. However, mpx+ neutrophil clearance was attenuated in zebrafish heart without cardiac lymphatic vessels after cryoinjury [33]. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining, which detects DNA breaks in apoptosis, revealed an accumulation of TUNEL-positive signals at the infarcted area in cardiac lymphatic vessel impacted hearts in zebrafish [60]. These results indicate that the functions of cardiac lymphatic vessels in immune cell clearance and necrotic cell removal are essential for efficient heart regeneration after cryoinjury in zebrafish. This suggests a therapeutic benefit in targeting a patient’s cardiac lymphatic vessels after MI. According to zebrafish heart regeneration results, the induction of cardiac lymphangiogenesis after MI may prevent long-term inflammation and fibrotic scar deposition. It will be interesting to investigate further the dysregulation of myocardial metabolism in the zebrafish lacking cardiac lymphatics and potential effects on myocardial proliferation and regeneration.

5. Future Directions

The zebrafish is an emerging model to study development, regeneration, and model human disease due to their amenability for imaging and available forward and reverse genetic tools. The studies of trunk lymphatic vessels in zebrafish embryos have provided valuable insights into lymphatic development. Different organs, including the heart, may utilize organ/tissue-specific mechanisms to regulate fluid homeostasis and immune cell modulation to accommodate their physiological demands, and this is currently under intense study. For the roles of cardiac lymphatic vessels, the following aspects can be further clarified and studied.

5.1. Cardiac Lymphatic Formation and Populations

We and others have performed a detailed characterization of cardiac lymphatic vessel development and neo-lymphangiogenesis during zebrafish heart regeneration as a basis for future studies. One unexpected aspect of the cardiac lymphatic vessels in zebrafish is their discontinuous nature over the ventricle. A conduit is formed as observed with Qdot uptake following intramyocardial injection [33], but also individual or small groups of LECs were often observed in connection with the main cardiac lymphatic vessel or isolated from it [33,34,60]. Interestingly, Gancz et al. found that this population has a different sensitivity to signaling changes suggesting that isolated cells may not require the scaffold of the coronary arteries. Furthermore, additional signaling pathways and sources may be directing cardiac lymphatic development. Understanding the development of cardiac lymphatic vessels at the cellular level and the signaling that shapes them will be critical to therapeutically encourage (or discourage) their formation.
It remains unclear whether these isolated lymphatic cells and clusters are truly a distinct population or if they are an artifact of the formation of this delicate lymphatic vessel. They may reciprocally dissociate and associate from the main vessel as it expands during development and regeneration. This is consistent with the observed reduced sensitivity of isolated LECs to loss of cxcr4a, which manifests as a range of phenotypic severity [33,80]. In cxcr4a mutant zebrafish that develop some coronary vasculature, this may be sufficient to support limited LEC outgrowth and expansion but still insufficient for complete vessel formation. Significantly, these isolated LEC clusters were transiently observed in mouse embryonic hearts, but the origins of the clusters were found to be indistinguishable from the main vessel [34]. This suggests that the LEC clusters could be derived from the main lymphatic vessel in a process that may be similar to that observed during lung development [81]. The clusters are transient in the mouse, not being identifiable at later stages. As the development of the cardiac vessel progresses, these clusters may progressively fuse with the main vessel.
Regardless of origin, it is also possible that isolated LEC populations can contribute to heart regeneration. They appear in zebrafish heart during regeneration after cryoinjury [34]. Furthermore, the identification of the first lymphangiocrine, RELN, suggests that the positive benefits post-MI are not limited to the lymphatics acting as a conduit in the classical sense [78]. Individual cells could excrete pro-regenerative factors or provide scavenger functions much like those described of brain LECs/fluorescent granular perithelial cells [82,83]. It will be fascinating to further uncover the unexpected support functions and morphogenic events of LECs in developmental and regenerative contexts.

5.2. Signaling Pathways Regulating Cardiac Lymphatic Vessel Expansion

Many different signaling pathways emanating from coronary vasculature or otherwise might be further explored. One candidate signaling pathway is Notch, which is known to regulate EC proliferation, motility, filopodia formation, adhesion, and vessel stabilization [84]. Notch receptors and ligands such as Notch1 and Dll4 are predominantly expressed in arterial endothelial cells during embryonic development and arterial cell specification [85,86]. Activation of Notch 1 by Dll4-positive venous ECs (VECs) has been shown to induce a lymphatic transcription profile and so transcriptional activation of Notch signaling may be required to reprogram VEC into LEC [87]. Moreover, genetic targeting of Notch impaired LEC migration during embryonic zebrafish development [87] and blocking its activation by Dll4-expression leads to downregulation of Lyve1 and EphrinB2 both in vitro [42] and in vivo [88]. Conversely, the lack of Notch activity resulted also in enhanced lymphatic sprouting leading to an increased LEC proliferation/survival in mice [89,90]. The role of Notch signaling in cardiac LECs is less well understood and will require further study.

5.3. Role of Cardiac Lymphatics in Myocardial Infarction

A key role of lymphatic vasculature is the clearance of interstitial fluid. Loss of cardiac lymphatic vessels on the ventricle did not appear to give rise to overt interstitial edema [33,34,60]. Only with loss of vegfd together with compromised Vegfc function was hypertrophy observed, but it is not clear if this is caused by interstitial edema. In most conditions of compromised Vegfc-Flt4 and/or coronary vessel signaling, the BA lymphatic vessels remain largely unaffected, and this may be sufficient to provide a conduit for fluid removal. It remains to be determined if the hypertrophy observed in the vegfc hypermorph; vegfd double mutant (vegfchy−/−; vegfd−/−) is due to loss of the BA populations, misregulation of Flt4/Vegfr3-independent signaling or a compensatory effect of earlier reductions in cardiomyocyte proliferation due to loss of mitogens as observed in the mouse [78]. The phenotypic variability observed with the vegfchy−/−; vegfd−/− combination, indeed all the variability in reported phenotypes across the three studies using various mutant alleles and reporters, needs to be considered in light of varying modifiers in the genetic background [91].
The damage to heart tissue that occurs in response to MI is complex, involving hypoxia, necrosis, inflammation and fibrosis. The cryoinjury model of zebrafish heart incorporates these features more robustly than the amputation injury. Complexity in a model can occlude analysis of specific processes; however, the cost of this simplicity is that not all features of the regenerative response are captured with the amputation model. In amputation, there is a lack of lymphangiogenesis, and the regenerative response is not perturbed with loss of lymphatics on the ventricle, both, however, are observed after cryoinjury [33,34,60]. Comparison of the models provides a useful insight into which processes are driving the expansion of lymphatic vessels, their roles at the wound site and how these can be utilized to resolve the complex post-MI environment observed in patients.

Author Contributions

X.F., S.T., C.A.P., C.-L.L., and M.R.M.H. wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by NIH (1R01HL148706), DOD (W81XWH19-1-0359) and TRDRP (T30IP1028) to CLL.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Natale, G.; Bocci, G.; Ribatti, D. Scholars and scientists in the history of the lymphatic system. J. Anat. 2017, 231, 417–429. [Google Scholar]
  2. Oliver, G.; Kipnis, J.; Randolph, G.J.; Harvey, N.L. The Lymphatic Vasculature in the 21st Century: Novel Functional Roles in Homeostasis and Disease. Cell 2020, 182, 270–296. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brouillard, P.; Boon, L.; Vikkula, M. Genetics of lymphatic anomalies. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 898–904. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rockson, S.G. Lymphedema. Am. J. Med. 2001, 110, 288–295. [Google Scholar]
  5. Randolph, G.J.; Ivanov, S.; Zinselmeyer, B.H.; Scallan, J.P. The lymphatic system: Integral roles in immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 35, 31–52. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bogoslowski, A.; Butcher, E.C.; Kubes, P. Neutrophils recruited through high endothelial venules of the lymph nodes via PNAd intercept disseminating Staphylococcus aureus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 2449–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Takeda, A.; Hollmén, M.; Dermadi, D.; Pan, J.; Brulois, K.F.; Kaukonen, R.; Lönnberg, T.; Boström, P.; Koskivuo, I.; Irjala, H.; et al. Single-Cell Survey of Human Lymphatics Unveils Marked Endothelial Cell Heterogeneity and Mechanisms of Homing for Neutrophils. Immunity 2019, 51, 561–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bernier-Latmani, J.; Petrova, T. V Intestinal lymphatic vasculature: Structure, mechanisms and functions. Nat. Publ. Gr. 2017, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Harvey, N.L.; Srinivasan, R.S.; Dillard, M.E.; Johnson, N.C.; Witte, M.H.; Boyd, K.; Sleeman, M.W.; Oliver, G. Lymphatic vascular defects promoted by Prox1 haploinsufficiency cause adult-onset obesity. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 1072–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Escobedo, N.; Proulx, S.; Karaman, S.; Dillard, M.E.; Johnson, N.; Detmar, M.; Oliver, G. undefined Restoration of lymphatic function rescues obesity in Prox1-haploinsufficient mice. JCI Insight 2016, 1, 85096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kampmeier, O.F. Evolution and Comparative Morphology of the Lymphatic System; Charles C Thomas: Springfield, IL, USA, 1971; Volume 64, ISBN 9780398009663. [Google Scholar]
  12. Romer, A.S. The Vertebrate Body; W.B. Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1977; ISBN 0721676685. [Google Scholar]
  13. Peyrot, S.M.; Martin, B.L.; Harland, R.M. Lymph heart musculature is under distinct developmental control from lymphatic endothelium. Dev. Biol. 2010, 339, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Steffensen, J.F.; Lomholt, J.P. The secondary vascular system. In Fish Physiology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1992; Volume 12, pp. 185–217. [Google Scholar]
  15. Küchler, A.M.; Gjini, E.; Peterson-Maduro, J.; Cancilla, B.; Wolburg, H.; Schulte-Merker, S. Development of the Zebrafish Lymphatic System Requires Vegfc Signaling. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 1244–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Yaniv, K.; Isogai, S.; Castranova, D.; Dye, L.; Hitomi, J.; Weinstein, B.M. Live imaging of lymphatic development in the zebrafish. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 711–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shin, M.; Nozaki, T.; Idrizi, F.; Isogai, S.; Ogasawara, K.; Ishida, K.; Yuge, S.; Roscoe, B.; Wolfe, S.A.; Fukuhara, S.; et al. Valves Are a Conserved Feature of the Zebrafish Lymphatic System. Dev. Cell 2019, 51, 374–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vogel, W.O.P.; Claviez, M. Vascular Specialization in Fish, but No Evidence for Lymphatics. Z. Naturforsch. C J. Biosci. 1981, 36, 490–492. [Google Scholar]
  19. Vogel, W.O.P. Zebrafish and lymphangiogenesis: A reply. Anat. Sci. Int. 2010, 85, 118–119. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jensen, L.D.E.; Cao, R.; Hedlund, E.M.; Söll, I.; Lundberg, J.O.; Hauptmann, G.; Steffensen, J.F.; Cao, Y. Nitric oxide permits hypoxia-induced lymphatic perfusion by controlling arterial-lymphatic conduits in zebrafish and glass catfish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 18408–18413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Isogai, S.; Hitomi, J.; Yaniv, K.; Weinstein, B.M. Zebrafish as a new animal model to study lymphangiogenesis. Anat. Sci. Int. 2009, 84, 102–111. [Google Scholar]
  22. Koltowska, K.; Lagendijk, A.K.; Pichol-Thievend, C.; Fischer, J.C.; Francois, M.; Ober, E.A.; Yap, A.S.; Hogan, B.M. Vegfc Regulates Bipotential Precursor Division and Prox1 Expression to Promote Lymphatic Identity in Zebrafish. Cell Rep. 2015, 13, 1828–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Shin, M.; Male, I.; Beane, T.J.; Villefranc, J.A.; Kok, F.O.; Zhu, L.J.; Lawson, N.D. Vegfc acts through ERK to induce sprouting and differentiation of trunk lymphatic progenitors. Development 2016, 143, 3785–3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Nicenboim, J.; Malkinson, G.; Lupo, T.; Asaf, L.; Sela, Y.; Mayseless, O.; Gibbs-Bar, L.; Senderovich, N.; Hashimshony, T.; Shin, M.; et al. Lymphatic vessels arise from specialized angioblasts within a venous niche. Nature 2015, 522, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jung, H.M.; Castranova, D.; Swift, M.R.; Pham, V.N.; Venero Galanternik, M.; Isogai, S.; Butler, M.G.; Mulligan, T.S.; Weinstein, B.M. Development of the larval lymphatic system in zebrafish. Development 2017, 144, 2070–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Okuda, K.S.; Astin, J.W.; Misa, J.P.; Flores, M.V.; Crosier, K.E.; Crosier, P.S. lyve1 expression reveals novel lymphatic vessels and new mechanisms for lymphatic vessel development in zebrafish. Development 2012, 139, 2381–2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Coffindaffer-Wilson, M.; Craig, M.P.; Hove, J.R. Determination of lymphatic vascular identity and developmental timecourse in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Lymphology 2011, 44, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  28. Venero Galanternik, M.; Stratman, A.N.; Jung, H.M.; Butler, M.G.; Weinstein, B.M. Building the drains: The lymphatic vasculature in health and disease. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2016, 5, 689–710. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sabin, F.R. On the origin of the lymphatic system from the veins and the development of the lymph hearts and thoracic duct in the pig. Am. J. Anat. 1902, 1, 367–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wilting, J.; Aref, Y.; Huang, R.; Tomarev, S.I.; Schweigerer, L.; Christ, B.; Valasek, P.; Papoutsi, M. Dual origin of avian lymphatics. Dev. Biol. 2006, 292, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kampmeier, O.F. On the lymph flow of the human heart, with reference to the development of the channels and the first appearance, distribution, and physiology of their valves. Am. Heart J. 1928, 4, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Klotz, L.; Norman, S.; Vieira, J.M.; Masters, M.; Rohling, M.; Dube, K.N.; Bollini, S.; Matsuzaki, F.; Carr, C.A.; Riley, P.R. Cardiac lymphatics are heterogeneous in origin and respond to injury. Nature 2015, 522, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Harrison, M.R.; Feng, X.; Mo, G.; Aguayo, A.; Villafuerte, J.; Yoshida, T.; Pearson, C.A.; Schulte-Merker, S.; Ching-Ling, L. Late developing cardiac lymphatic vasculature supports adult zebrafish heart function and regeneration. eLife 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gancz, D.; Raftrey, B.C.; Perlmoter, G.; Marín-Juez, R.; Semo, J.; Matsuoka, R.L.; Karra, R.; Raviv, H.; Moshe, N.; Addadi, Y.; et al. Distinct origins and molecular mechanisms contribute to lymphatic formation during cardiac growth and regeneration. eLife 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ratajska, A.; Gula, G.; Flaht-Zabost, A.; Czarnowska, E.; Ciszek, B.; Jankowska-Steifer, E.; Niderla-Bielinska, J.; Radomska-Lesniewska, D. Comparative and Developmental Anatomy of Cardiac Lymphatics. Sci. World J. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Srinivasan, R.S.; Dillard, M.E.; Lagutin, O.V.; Lin, F.J.; Tsai, S.; Tsai, M.J.; Samokhvalov, I.M.; Oliver, G. Lineage tracing demonstrates the venous origin of the mammalian lymphatic vasculature. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 2422–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Martinez-Corral, I.; Ulvmar, M.H.; Stanczuk, L.; Tatin, F.; Kizhatil, K.; John, S.W.M.; Alitalo, K.; Ortega, S.; Makinen, T. Nonvenous origin of dermal lymphatic vasculature. Circ. Res. 2015, 116, 1649–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Stanczuk, L.; Martinez-Corral, I.; Ulvmar, M.H.; Zhang, Y.; Laviña, B.; Fruttiger, M.; Adams, R.H.; Saur, D.; Betsholtz, C.; Ortega, S.; et al. CKit lineage hemogenic endothelium-derived cells contribute to mesenteric lymphatic vessels. Cell Rep. 2015, 10, 1708–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lioux, G.; Liu, X.; Temiño, S.; Oxendine, M.; Ayala, E.; Ortega, S.; Kelly, R.G.; Oliver, G.; Torres, M. A Second Heart Field-Derived Vasculogenic Niche Contributes to Cardiac Lymphatics. Dev. Cell 2020, 52, 350–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maruyama, K.; Miyagawa-Tomita, S.; Mizukami, K.; Matsuzaki, F.; Kurihara, H. Isl1-expressing non-venous cell lineage contributes to cardiac lymphatic vessel development. Dev. Biol. 2019, 452, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Eng, T.C.; Chen, W.; Okuda, K.S.; Misa, J.P.; Padberg, Y.; Crosier, K.E.; Crosier, P.S.; Hall, C.J.; Schulte-Merker, S.; Hogan, B.M.; et al. Zebrafish facial lymphatics develop through sequential addition of venous and non-venous progenitors. EMBO Rep. 2019, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kang, J.; Yoo, J.; Lee, S.; Tang, W.; Aguilar, B.; Ramu, S.; Choi, I.; Otu, H.H.; Shin, J.W.; Dotto, G.P.; et al. An exquisite cross-control mechanism among endothelial cell fate regulators directs the plasticity and heterogeneity of lymphatic endothelial cells. Blood 2010, 116, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. You, L.R.; Lin, F.J.; Lee, C.T.; DeMayo, F.J.; Tsai, M.J.; Tsai, S.Y. Suppression of Notch signalling by the COUP-TFII transcription factor regulates vein identity. Nature 2005, 435, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Johnson, N.C.; Dillard, M.E.; Baluk, P.; McDonald, D.M.; Harvey, N.L.; Frase, S.L.; Oliver, G. Lymphatic endothelial cell identity is reversible and its maintenance requires Prox1 activity. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 3282–3291. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wigle, J.T.; Harvey, N.; Detmar, M.; Lagutina, I.; Grosveld, G.; Gunn, M.D.; Jackson, D.G.; Oliver, G. An essential role for Prox1 in the induction of the lymphatic endothelial cell phenotype. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 1505–1513. [Google Scholar]
  46. François, M.; Caprini, A.; Hosking, B.; Orsenigo, F.; Wilhelm, D.; Browne, C.; Paavonen, K.; Karnezis, T.; Shayan, R.; Downes, M.; et al. Sox18 induces development of the lymphatic vasculature in mice. Nature 2008, 456, 643–647. [Google Scholar]
  47. Srinivasan, R.S.; Geng, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Mukatira, S.; Studer, M.; Porto, M.P.R.; Lagutin, O.; Oliver, G. The nuclear hormone receptor Coup-TFII is required for the initiation and early maintenance of Prox1 expression in lymphatic endothelial cells. Genes Dev. 2010, 24, 696–707. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kazenwadel, J.; Secker, G.A.; Liu, Y.J.; Rosenfeld, J.A.; Wildin, R.S.; Cuellar-Rodriguez, J.; Hsu, A.P.; Dyack, S.; Fernandez, C.V.; Chong, C.E.; et al. Loss-of-function germline GATA2 mutations in patients with MDS/AML or MonoMAC syndrome and primary lymphedema reveal a key role for GATA2 in the lymphatic vasculature. Blood 2012, 119, 1283–1291. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kazenwadel, J.; Betterman, K.L.; Chong, C.E.; Stokes, P.H.; Lee, Y.K.; Secker, G.A.; Agalarov, Y.; Demir, C.S.; Lawrence, D.M.; Sutton, D.L.; et al. GATA2 is required for lymphatic vessel valve development and maintenance. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 2879–2994. [Google Scholar]
  50. Gauvrit, S.; Villasenor, A.; Strilic, B.; Kitchen, P.; Collins, M.M.; Marín-Juez, R.; Guenther, S.; Maischein, H.M.; Fukuda, N.; Canham, M.A.; et al. HHEX is a transcriptional regulator of the VEGFC/FLT4/PROX1 signaling axis during vascular development. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  51. Karkkainen, M.J.; Haiko, P.; Sainio, K.; Partanen, J.; Taipale, J.; Petrova, T.V.; Jeltsch, M.; Jackson, D.G.; Talikka, M.; Rauvala, H.; et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor C is required for sprouting of the first lymphatic vessels from embryonic veins. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xu, Y.; Yuan, L.; Mak, J.; Pardanaud, L.; Caunt, M.; Kasman, I.; Larrivée, B.; Del Toro, R.; Suchting, S.; Medvinsky, A.; et al. Neuropilin-2 mediates VEGF-C-induced lymphatic sprouting together with VEGFR3. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 188, 115–130. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wirzenius, M.; Tammela, T.; Uutela, M.; He, Y.; Odorisio, T.; Zambruno, G.; Nagy, J.A.; Dvorak, H.F.; Ylä-Herttuala, S.; Shibuya, M.; et al. Distinct vascular endothelial growth factor signals for lymphatic vessel enlargement and sprouting. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 1431–1440. [Google Scholar]
  54. Veikkola, T.; Jussila, L.; Makinen, T.; Karpanen, T.; Jeltsch, M.; Petrova, T.V.; Kubo, H.; Thurston, G.; McDonald, D.M.; Achen, M.G.; et al. Signalling via vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 is sufficient for lymphangiogenesis in transgenic mice. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 1223–1231. [Google Scholar]
  55. He, Y.; Rajantie, I.; Pajusola, K.; Jeltsch, M.; Holopainen, T.; Yla-Herttuala, S.; Harding, T.; Jooss, K.; Takahashi, T.; Alitalo, K. Vascular endothelial cell growth factor receptor 3-mediated activation of lymphatic endothelium is crucial for tumor cell entry and spread via lymphatic vessels. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 4739–4746. [Google Scholar]
  56. Jurisic, G.; Detmar, M. Lymphatic endothelium in health and disease. Cell Tissue Res. 2009, 335, 97–108. [Google Scholar]
  57. Maby-El Hajjami, H.; Petrova, T.V. Developmental and pathological lymphangiogenesis: From models to human disease. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2008, 130, 1063–1078. [Google Scholar]
  58. Hogan, B.M.; Herpers, R.; Witte, M.; Heloterä, H.; Alitalo, K.; Duckers, H.J.; Schulte-Merker, S. Vegfc/Flt4 signalling is suppressed by Dll4 in developing zebrafish intersegmental arteries. Development 2009, 136, 4001–4009. [Google Scholar]
  59. van Impel, A.; Zhao, Z.; Hermkens, D.M.A.; Roukens, M.G.; Fischer, J.C.; Peterson-Maduro, J.; Duckers, H.; Ober, E.A.; Ingham, P.W.; Schulte-Merker, S. Divergence of zebrafish and mouse lymphatic cell fate specification pathways. Development 2014, 141, 1228–1238. [Google Scholar]
  60. Vivien, C.J.; Pichol-Thievend, C.; Sim, C.B.; Smith, J.B.; Bower, N.I.; Hogan, B.M.; Hudson, J.E.; Francois, M.; Porrello, E.R. Vegfc/d-dependent regulation of the lymphatic vasculature during cardiac regeneration is influenced by injury context. NPJ Regen. Med. 2019, 4, 18. [Google Scholar]
  61. Guerrero, A.; Icardo, J.M.; Durán, A.C.; Gallego, A.; Domezain, A.; Colvee, E.; Sans-Coma, V. Differentiation of the cardiac outflow tract components in alevins of the sturgeon Acipenser naccarii (Osteichthyes, Acipenseriformes): Implications for heart evolution. J. Morphol. 2004, 260, 172–183. [Google Scholar]
  62. Harvey, N.L. The link between lymphatic function and adipose biology. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1131, 82–88. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lim, H.Y.; Thiam, C.H.; Yeo, K.P.; Bisoendial, R.; Hii, C.S.; McGrath, K.C.Y.; Tan, K.W.; Heather, A.; Alexander, J.S.J.; Angeli, V. Lymphatic vessels are essential for the removal of cholesterol from peripheral tissues by SR-BI-Mediated transport of HDL. Cell Metab. 2013, 17, 671–684. [Google Scholar]
  64. Gomez, D.; Shankman, L.S.; Nguyen, A.T.; Owens, G.K. Detection of histone modifications at specific gene loci in single cells in histological sections. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 171–177. [Google Scholar]
  65. Hansson, G.K.; Nilsson, J. Vaccination against atherosclerosis? Induction of atheroprotective immunity. Semin. Immunopathol. 2009, 31, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
  66. Kannel, W.B.; Dawber, T.R.; Kagan, A.; Revotskie, N.; Stokes, J. Factors of risk in the development of coronary heart disease--six year follow-up experience. The Framingham Study. Ann. Intern. Med. 1961, 55, 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kholová, I.; Dragneva, G.; Čermáková, P.; Laidinen, S.; Kaskenpää, N.; Hazes, T.; Čermáková, E.; Šteiner, I.; Ylä-Herttuala, S. Lymphatic vasculature is increased in heart valves, ischaemic and inflamed hearts and in cholesterol-rich and calcified atherosclerotic lesions. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 41, 487–497. [Google Scholar]
  68. Nykanen, A.I.; Sandelin, H.; Krebs, R.; Keranen, M.A.I.; Tuuminen, R.; Karpanen, T.; Wu, Y.; Pytowski, B.; Koskinen, P.K.; Yla-Herttuala, S.; et al. Targeting Lymphatic Vessel Activation and CCL21 Production by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 Inhibition Has Novel Immunomodulatory and Antiarteriosclerotic Effects in Cardiac Allografts. Circulation 2010, 121, 1413–1422. [Google Scholar]
  69. Thygesen, K.; Alpert, J.S.; Jaffe, A.S.; Simoons, M.L.; Chaitman, B.R.; White, H.D. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2012, 9, 620–633. [Google Scholar]
  70. Henri, O.; Pouehe, C.; Houssari, M.; Galas, L.; Nicol, L.; Edwards-Levy, F.; Henry, J.P.; Dumesnil, A.; Boukhalfa, I.; Banquet, S.; et al. Selective Stimulation of Cardiac Lymphangiogenesis Reduces Myocardial Edema and Fibrosis Leading to Improved Cardiac Function Following Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2016, 133, 1484–1497. [Google Scholar]
  71. Ishikawa, Y.; Akishima-Fukasawa, Y.; Ito, K.; Akasaka, Y.; Tanaka, M.; Shimokawa, R.; Kimura-Matsumoto, M.; Morita, H.; Sato, S.; Kamata, I.; et al. Lymphangiogenesis in myocardial remodelling after infarction. Histopathology 2007, 51, 345–353. [Google Scholar]
  72. Vuorio, T.; Ylä-Herttuala, E.; Laakkonen, J.P.; Laidinen, S.; Liimatainen, T.; Ylä-Herttuala, S. Downregulation of VEGFR3 signaling alters cardiac lymphatic vessel organization and leads to a higher mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  73. Tatin, F.; Renaud-Gabardos, E.; Godet, A.C.; Hantelys, F.; Pujol, F.; Morfoisse, F.; Calise, D.; Viars, F.; Valet, P.; Masri, B.; et al. Apelin modulates pathological remodeling of lymphatic endothelium after myocardial infarction. JCI Insight 2017, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Vieira, J.M.; Norman, S.; del, Campo, C.V.; Cahill, T.J.; Barnette, D.N.; Gunadasa-Rohling, M.; Johnson, L.A.; Greaves, D.R.; Carr, C.A.; Jackson, D.G.; et al. The cardiac lymphatic system stimulates resolution of inflammation following myocardial infarction. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sawane, M.; Kajiya, K.; Kidoya, H.; Takagi, M.; Muramatsu, F.; Takakura, N. Apelin inhibits diet-induced obesity by enhancing lymphatic and blood vessel integrity. Diabetes 2013, 62, 1970–1980. [Google Scholar]
  76. Gale, N.W.; Prevo, R.; Espinosa, J.; Ferguson, D.J.; Dominguez, M.G.; Yancopoulos, G.D.; Thurston, G.; Jackson, D.G. Normal Lymphatic Development and Function in Mice Deficient for the Lymphatic Hyaluronan Receptor LYVE-1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 595–604. [Google Scholar]
  77. Johnson, L.A.; Banerji, S.; Lawrance, W.; Gileadi, U.; Prota, G.; Holder, K.A.; Roshorm, Y.M.; Hanke, T.; Cerundolo, V.; Gale, N.W.; et al. Dendritic cells enter lymph vessels by hyaluronan-mediated docking to the endothelial receptor LYVE-1. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 762–770. [Google Scholar]
  78. Liu, X.; De la Cruz, E.; Gu, X.; Balint, L.; Oxendine-Burns, M.; Terrones, T.; Ma, W.; Kuo, H.H.; Lantz, C.; Bansal, T.; et al. Lymphoangiocrine signals promote cardiac growth and repair. Nature 2020, 588, 705–711. [Google Scholar]
  79. González-Rosa, J.M.; Burns, C.E.; Burns, C.G. Zebrafish heart regeneration: 15 years of discoveries. Regeneration 2017, 4, 105–123. [Google Scholar]
  80. Harrison, M.R.M.; Bussmann, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Osorio, A.; Burns, C.G.; Burns, G.E.; Sucov, H.M.; Siekmann, A.F.; Lien, C.L. Chemokine-guided angiogenesis directs coronary vasculature formation in zebrafish. Dev. Cell 2015, 33, 442–454. [Google Scholar]
  81. Kulkarni, R.M.; Herman, A.; Ikegami, M.; Greenberg, J.M.; Akeson, A.L. Lymphatic ontogeny and effect of hypoplasia in developing lung. Mech. Dev. 2011, 128, 29–40. [Google Scholar]
  82. Galanternik, M.V.; Castranova, D.; Gore, A.V.; Blewett, N.H.; Jung, H.M.; Stratman, A.N.; Kirby, M.R.; Iben, J.; Miller, M.F.; Kawakami, K.; et al. A novel perivascular cell population in the zebrafish brain. eLife 2017, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. van Lessen, M.; Shibata-Germanos, S.; van Impel, A.; Hawkins, T.A.; Rihel, J.; Schulte-Merker, S. Intracellular uptake of macromolecules by brain lymphatic endothelial cells during zebrafish embryonic development. eLife 2017, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Phng, L.K.; Gerhardt, H. Angiogenesis: A Team Effort Coordinated by Notch. Dev. Cell 2009, 16, 196–208. [Google Scholar]
  85. Kume, T. Novel insights into the differential functions of Notch ligands in vascular formation. J. Angiogenes. Res. 2009, 1, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Gridley, T. Notch signaling in the vasculature. Curr. Top Dev. Biol. 2010, 92, 277–309. [Google Scholar]
  87. Geudens, I.; Herpers, R.; Hermans, K.; Segura, I.; Ruiz de Almodovar, C.; Bussmann, J.; De Smet, F.; Vandevelde, W.; Hogan, B.M.; Siekmann, A.; et al. Role of delta-like-4/Notch in the formation and wiring of the lymphatic network in zebrafish. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010, 30, 1695–1702. [Google Scholar]
  88. Niessen, K.; Zhang, G.; Ridgway, J.B.; Chen, H.; Kolumam, G.; Siebel, C.W.; Yan, M. The notch1-Dll4 signaling pathway regulates mouse postnatal lymphatic development. Blood 2011, 118, 1989–1997. [Google Scholar]
  89. Zheng, W.; Tammela, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Anisimov, A.; Holopainen, T.; Kaijalainen, S.; Karpanen, T.; Lehti, K.; Ylä-Herttuala, S.; Alitalo, K. Notch restricts lymphatic vessel sprouting induced by vascular endothelial growth factor. Blood 2011, 118, 1154–1162. [Google Scholar]
  90. Fatima, A.; Culver, A.; Culver, F.; Liu, T.; Dietz, W.H.; Thomson, B.R.; Hadjantonakis, A.K.; Quaggin, S.E.; Kume, T. Murine Notch1 is required for lymphatic vascular morphogenesis during development. Dev. Dyn. 2014, 243, 957–964. [Google Scholar]
  91. Crim, M.J.; Lawrence, C. A fish is not a mouse: Understanding differences in background genetics is critical for reproducibility. Lab Anim. 2021, 50, 19–25. [Google Scholar]
Jcdd 08 00021 g001 550
Figure 1. Cardiac lymphatic vessel development and regeneration. (a) Cardiac lymphatic vessels (flt4+, lyve1b+, prox1a+) that reside on bulbus arteriosus (BA) start to migrate down to the ventricle after 3 months post-fertilization (mpf) when juvenile fish mature to adults. (b) Cardiac lymphatic vessels follow the course of the coronary artery to populate the ventricle. (c) Lymphatic activation during heart regeneration. After cryoinjury, the lymphatic vasculature starts to migrate into the wound at 14 days post-cryoinjury (dpc), over the wound site and is crucial for supporting the regenerative response.
Figure 1. Cardiac lymphatic vessel development and regeneration. (a) Cardiac lymphatic vessels (flt4+, lyve1b+, prox1a+) that reside on bulbus arteriosus (BA) start to migrate down to the ventricle after 3 months post-fertilization (mpf) when juvenile fish mature to adults. (b) Cardiac lymphatic vessels follow the course of the coronary artery to populate the ventricle. (c) Lymphatic activation during heart regeneration. After cryoinjury, the lymphatic vasculature starts to migrate into the wound at 14 days post-cryoinjury (dpc), over the wound site and is crucial for supporting the regenerative response.
Jcdd 08 00021 g001
Jcdd 08 00021 g002 550
Figure 2. The roles of the cardiac lymphatic system in heart disease and regeneration. Coronary artery occlusion by atherosclerotic plaque causes myocardial infarction. The plaque is composed of infiltrated macrophage and cholesterol deposits; cardiac lymphatics running along the artery provide a conduit for cholesterol as a βHDL complex to be removed from the heart and returned to the liver (boxed area). During development, homeostasis and disease, the cardiac lymphatics uptake cell debris, macromolecules, immune cells, pathogens and fluid. Insufficiency of such removal can result in inflammation and edema induced fibrosis, which is detrimental for clinical outcomes. The lymphatic vasculature responds to such insufficiency by the expansion of the lymphatic capillaries after damage to the myocardium. The lymphatic endothelial cells are also a source of lymphangiocrines, excreted proteins that promote regeneration and growth of the myocardial tissue.
Figure 2. The roles of the cardiac lymphatic system in heart disease and regeneration. Coronary artery occlusion by atherosclerotic plaque causes myocardial infarction. The plaque is composed of infiltrated macrophage and cholesterol deposits; cardiac lymphatics running along the artery provide a conduit for cholesterol as a βHDL complex to be removed from the heart and returned to the liver (boxed area). During development, homeostasis and disease, the cardiac lymphatics uptake cell debris, macromolecules, immune cells, pathogens and fluid. Insufficiency of such removal can result in inflammation and edema induced fibrosis, which is detrimental for clinical outcomes. The lymphatic vasculature responds to such insufficiency by the expansion of the lymphatic capillaries after damage to the myocardium. The lymphatic endothelial cells are also a source of lymphangiocrines, excreted proteins that promote regeneration and growth of the myocardial tissue.
Jcdd 08 00021 g002
Table
Table 1. Summary of the genetic tools and findings of papers describing the zebrafish cardiac lymphatic system.
Table 1. Summary of the genetic tools and findings of papers describing the zebrafish cardiac lymphatic system.
Vivien et al. [60]Harrison et al. [33]Gancz et al. [34]
Cardiac lymphatic vessels (LVs)prox1a+ lyve1b+prox1a+ flt4+ lyve1b+ (high BA; low ventricle) mrc1a+ stab1+prox1a+ flt4+ lyve1b+ mrc1a+
LVs in regeneration (cryoinjury)prox1a+prox1a+ flt4+ lyve1b+(low) mrc1a+prox1a+ flt4+ lyve1b+ mrc1a+
Roles of LVsCardiac hypertrophy, metabolic homeostasis, and inflammation resolutionCardiac regeneration, cell debris clearance and inflammation resolutionCardiac regeneration
Mutants lacking BA LECsvegfchy−/−; vegfd−/−-flt4−/−
Mutants/Tg lacking ventricular LECsvegfchy+/−; vegfd−/−
vegfchy−/−; vegfd+/−		sFlt4
cxcr4a−/− (majority)		vegfc+/−, flt4−/−
cxcr4a−/− (isolated LECs unaffected)
Mutants with hypertrophyvegfchy−/−; vegfd−/−--
Mutants/Tg defective scar resolutionvegfchy−/−; vegfd−/− (30%)cxcr4a−/−
sFlt4		vegfchy−/−; vegfd−/−, flt4−/−
cxcr4a−/−
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Feng, X.; Travisano, S.; Pearson, C.A.; Lien, C.-L.; Harrison, M.R.M. The Lymphatic System in Zebrafish Heart Development, Regeneration and Disease Modeling. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2021, 8, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd8020021

AMA Style

Feng X, Travisano S, Pearson CA, Lien C-L, Harrison MRM. The Lymphatic System in Zebrafish Heart Development, Regeneration and Disease Modeling. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2021; 8(2):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd8020021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feng, Xidi, Stanislao Travisano, Caroline A. Pearson, Ching-Ling Lien, and Michael R. M. Harrison. 2021. "The Lymphatic System in Zebrafish Heart Development, Regeneration and Disease Modeling" Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 8, no. 2: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd8020021

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop