Dataset: Impact of β -galactosylceramidase Overexpression on the Protein Pro ﬁ le of Braf(V600E) Mutated Melanoma Cells

: β -Galactosylceramidase (GALC) is a lysosomal enzyme involved in sphingolipid metabolism by removing β -galactosyl moieties from β -galactosyl ceramide and β -galactosyl sphingosine. Previous observations have shown that GALC exerts a pro-oncogenic activity in human melanoma. Here, the impact of GALC overexpression on the proteomic landscape of BRAF - mutated A2058 and A375 human melanoma cell lines was investigated by liquid chromatography– tandem mass spectrometry analysis of the cell extracts. The results indicate that GALC overexpression causes the upregulation/downregulation of 172/99 proteins in GALC -transduced cells when compared to control cells. Gene ontology categorization of up/down-regulated proteins indicates that GALC may modulate the protein landscape in BRAF -mutated melanoma cells by a ﬀ ecting various biological processes, including RNA metabolism, cell organelle fate, and intracellular redox status. Overall, these data provide further insights into the pro-oncogenic functions of the sphingolipid metabolizing enzyme GALC in human melanoma. Dataset: The data set has


Introduction
β-Galactosylceramidase (GALC; EC 3.2.1.46)is a lysosomal hydrolase that catalyzes the removal of the β-galactose moiety from β-galactosyl ceramide and other sphingolipids [1][2][3][4].A gradual increase in GALC expression occurs during human melanoma progression in skin specimens ranging from common nevi to stage IV melanoma [5], thus suggesting that GALC might act as a pro-oncogenic enzyme [6][7][8][9].In keeping with this hypothesis, Galc knockdown causes a decrease in the tumorigenic and metastatic potential of murine melanoma B16 cells that also showed significant alterations in their lipidomic profile, characterized by increased levels of the oncosuppressive sphingolipid ceramide [10,11].Accordingly, increased levels of ceramide were also observed in GALC-silenced human melanoma A2058 cells and tumor xenografts, with a consequent decrease in their tumorigenic potential [5].However, the mechanisms by which GALC exerts its protumorigenic functions in human melanoma remain poorly understood.
Analysis of the proteome may provide valuable information for the characterization of the biological pathways leading to melanoma progression [12][13][14][15][16] and for the identification of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers [17][18][19][20].As stated above, GALC may exert a pro-oncogenic role in Braf wild-type murine melanoma cells [5].However, approximately 50% of human melanomas are characterized by the BRAF (V600E) tumor driver mutation [21][22][23][24][25][26], which represents a major target in melanoma therapy [27][28][29][30].These observations prompted us to assess the role of GALC in human melanoma in the presence of a BRAF-mutated background [31].To this purpose, liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to investigate the impact of GALC overexpression on the proteomic profile of BRAF (V600E)-mutated A2058 and A375 human melanoma cells.Indeed, wild-type A2058 and A375 cells express intermediate levels of GALC mRNA and protein when compared to other human melanoma cell lines, therefore making them suitable for assessing the effect of GALC upregulation on the biological behavior of human melanoma cells in a BRAF-mutated background.In addition, given the well-known heterogeneity that characterizes human tumors [32][33][34][35][36], the use of two cell lines harboring the same driver mutation allows the identification of common protein profiles modulated by GALC overexpression in BRAF-mutated melanoma cells.Here, we will briefly illustrate the proteomic data that characterize the impact exerted by GALC on BRAF-mutated human melanoma cells.Refer to [31] for indepth analysis and discussion of these data.

Data Description
A2058-upGALC and A375-upGALC cells, together with the corresponding control A2058-mock and A375-mock cells, were obtained by lentiviral infection, and GALC overexpression was confirmed by a semiquantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and enzymatic activity assays [31].Next, LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on the cell extracts of the four cell lines.The number of proteins identified with a false discovery rate (FDR) below 1% is shown in Table 1.A hierarchic analysis performed by comparing the A2058-upGALC plus A375-upGALC data sets to the A2058-mock plus A375-mock data sets demonstrated that 304 and 340 proteins are up-or down-regulated (Q value < 0.05) in upGALC vs. mock cells (Supplementary Table S1).
Next, gene ontology (GO) categorization [37][38][39] was performed using the Enrichr platform [40] (https://maayanlab.cloud/Enrichr/,accessed on 18 July 2023) on the 271 GALC-modulated proteins (172 up-regulated plus 99 down-regulated) characterized by a fold change greater than 1.5 or lower than 0.67.The analysis identified the terms "RNA binding" (p value = 2.01 × 10 −12 ) and "intracellular organelle/secretory granule lumen" (p value = 1.17 × 10 −12 ) as the most enriched GO molecular function and GO cellular component terms, respectively, whereas "tricarboxylic acid cycle" represented a highly enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway [41] (p value = 2.59 × 10 −4 ).Accordingly, string analysis of the differentially expressed proteins identified three major clusters (protein-protein interaction enrichment p value ≤ 1.0 × 10 −16 ) corresponding to the GO terms "RNA binding" (FDR = 4.11 × 10 −8 ), "extracellular exosomes" (FDR = 6.77× 10 −21 ), and "oxidation-reduction process" (FDR = 2.79 × 10 −15 ) (Figure 1).Together, the data demonstrate that the lysosomal sphingolipid metabolizing enzyme GALC exerts a significant impact on the proteomic landscape of BRAF-mutated human melanoma cells.At present, the biochemical mechanisms leading to the observed alterations in the melanoma proteome induced by GALC upregulation remain unclarified.Previous observations had shown that GALC downregulation may exert significant alterations in the lipid profile of murine melanoma [5].Further studies will be required to assess the effect of the modulation of GALC activity on the sphingolipidome of human melanoma cells and how this, in turn, may orchestrate their transcriptomic and proteomic profiles.
Figure 1.String analysis of GALC-modulated proteins in melanoma cells.The three clusters are defined by the GO terms "RNA binding" (in blue), "extracellular exosomes" (in red), and "oxidation-reduction process" (in green).

Data Records
The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Table S2.Column A contains the following description of the identified protein peaks: UniProt primary accession ID|UniProt ID, name of the protein, organism (OS), and gene (GN).Columns B-Q show the values of the normalized peak area for the four replicates of A375-upGALC (B-E), A375-mock (F-I), A2058-upGALC (J-M), and A2058-mock (N-Q) cells.

Cell Cultures and Lentivirus Infection
A2058 and A375 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection and grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), hereinafter referred to as "complete medium".Cells were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator.Cells were infected with a lentivirus (Addgene plasmid #19070) harboring the human GALC cDNA (NM_000153.3),thus generating A2058-upGALC and A375-upGALC cells.Cells transduced with an empty vector were used as controls (A2058-mock and A375-mock cells).For the infection protocol, cells were incubated with lentiviral particles for 7 h in a complete medium containing 8.0 µg/mL of polybrene and selected by adding 1 µg/mL puromycin 24 h later.Next, GALC overexpression was confirmed by a semiquantitative real time polymerase chain reaction and by a GALC activity assay as previously described [5,31].

Sample Preparation
Cells were maintained for 2 days in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium plus 2% heatinactivated fetal bovine serum.Then, cell samples were lysed with a radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer, denatured with trifluoroethanol, subjected to dithiothreitol reduction (200 mM), iodoacetamide alkylation (200 mM), and complete trypsin protein digestion.The peptide digests were desalted on the Discovery ® DSC-18 solid phase extraction 96-well plate (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) (25 mg/well).After the desalting process, samples were vacuum-evaporated and reconstituted in a mobile phase for the analysis [42].All reagents were from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Proteomic Analysis
The digested peptides were analyzed with an Ultra High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Vanquish system (Thermo Scientific, Rodano, Italy) coupled with an Orbitrap Q-Exactive Plus (Thermo Scientific).Peptides were separated by a reverse-phase column (Accucore™ RP-MS 100 × 2.1 mm, particle size 2.6 µm) at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min, with water and acetonitrile as mobile phase A and B respectively, both acidified with 0.1% formic acid.The analysis was performed using the following gradient: 0-5 min from 2% to 5% B; 5-55 min from 5% to 30% B; 55-61 min from 30% to 90% B and hold for one min, at 62.1 min the percentage of B was set to the initial condition of the run at 2% and held for about 8 min to equilibrate the column, for a total run time of 70 min.The MS analysis was performed in positive ion mode.The electrospray ionization source was used with a voltage of 2.8 kV.The capillary temperature, sheath gas flow, auxiliary gas, and spare gas flow were set at 325 °C, 45 arb, 10 arb, and 2, respectively.S-lens was set at 70 rf.A data-dependent (ddMS2) top-10 scan mode was used for the acquisition of spectra.Survey fullscan MS spectra (mass range m/z 381 to 1581) were acquired with resolution R = 70,000 and an automatic gain control target of 3 × 10 6 .MS/MS fragmentation was performed using high-energy c-trap dissociation with resolution R = 35,000 and an automatic gain control target of 1 × 10 6 .The normalized collision energy was set to 30.The injection volume was 3 µL.
The mass spectra analysis was carried out using MaxQuant software (version 1.6.14).MaxQuant parameters were set as follows: trypsin was selected for enzyme specificity; the search parameters were fixed to an initial precursor ion tolerance of 10 ppm and MS/MS tolerance at 20 ppm; as fixed modification, carbamidomethylation was set, whereas oxidation was set as variable modification.The maximum missed cleavages were set to 2. Andromeda search engine searched the spectra in MaxQuant against the Uni-prot_CP_Human_2018 sequence database.Label-free quantification was performed including a match between runs option with the following parameters: protein and peptide FDR was set to 0.01 according to standard procedures; the quantification was based on the extracted ion chromatograms, with a minimum ratio count of 1; the minimum required peptide length was set to 7 amino acids.Statistical analyses for protein peak identification were performed using MaxQuant software (version 1.6.14)and MetaboAnalyst software (version 5.0) (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca-accessedon 24 January 2021) [43].

Statistical Analysis
Peak intensity values of the identified proteins were first transformed to log scale (plus 1 to avoid zero values) and modelled using a generalized linear mixed model to account for data hierarchical structure (condition nested within cell line) using R 4.3.0.Q values were considered to identify differentially expressed proteins due to their high statistical power.Proteins with a Q value < 5% are listed in Supplementary Table S1.Among them, proteins with a change greater than 1.5 or lower than 0.67 were run in STRING [44] and clustered in GO classes.

Table 1 .
Proteins identified in mock and upGALC cell lines.