A Novel Design Method of Gradient Porous Structure for Stabilized and Lightweight Mandibular Prosthesis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Design of Porous Scaffolds
2.2. Mechanical Evaluation of Porous Scaffolds
2.3. Optimization of Porous Scaffold
Algorithm 1: strut diameter optimization |
2.4. Test of Porous Scaffolds
2.5. Prosthesis Design and Optimization for Mandibular Reconstruction
2.6. Statistics
3. Results
3.1. Mechanical Characterization of Porous Scaffolds
3.2. Functionally Gradient Optimization of Porous Scaffold
3.3. Functionally Gradient Porous Mandibular Prosthesis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shiboski, C.H.; Schmidt, B.L.; Jordan, R.C. Tongue and tonsil carcinoma: Increasing trends in the U.S. population ages 20–44 years. Cancer 2005, 103, 1843–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pare, A.; Bossard, A.; Laure, B.; Weiss, P.; Gauthier, O.; Corre, P. Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects: Current procedures and perspectives. Laryngoscope Investig. Otolaryngol. 2019, 4, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, S.H.; Kim, M.K.; Kang, S.H. Precision of fibula positioning guide in mandibular reconstruction with a fibula graft. Head Face Med. 2016, 12, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okay, D.; Al Shetawi, A.H.; Moubayed, S.P.; Mourad, M.; Buchbinder, D.; Urken, M.L. Worldwide 10-Year Systematic Review of Treatment Trends in Fibula Free Flap for Mandibular Reconstruction. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2016, 74, 2526–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rendenbach, C.; Rashad, A.; Hansen, L.; Kohlmeier, C.; Dyck, M.L.; Suling, A.; Assaf, A.T.; Amling, M.; Heiland, M.; Wikner, J.; et al. Functional donor site morbidity longer than one year after fibula free flap: A prospective biomechanical analysis. Microsurgery 2018, 38, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hutmacher, D.W. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 2427–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Bael, S.; Kerckhofs, G.; Moesen, M.; Pyka, G.; Schrooten, J.; Kruth, J.P. Micro-CT-based improvement of geometrical and mechanical controllability of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V porous structures. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2011, 528, 7423–7431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelrhman, Y.; Gepreel, M.A.; Kobayashi, S.; Okano, S.; Okamoto, T. Biocompatibility of new low-cost (alpha+beta)-type Ti-Mo-Fe alloys for long-term implantation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 99, 552–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niinomi, M.; Nakai, M. Titanium-Based Biomaterials for Preventing Stress Shielding between Implant Devices and Bone. Int. J. Biomater. 2011, 2011, 836587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hutmacher, D.W.; Schantz, J.T.; Lam, C.X.; Tan, K.C.; Lim, T.C. State of the art and future directions of scaffold-based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2007, 1, 245–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollister, S.J. Scaffold design and manufacturing: From concept to clinic. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 3330–3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahraminasab, M. Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds. Biomed. Eng. Online 2020, 19, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olivares, A.L.; Marsal, E.; Planell, J.A.; Lacroix, D. Finite element study of scaffold architecture design and culture conditions for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 6142–6149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boccaccio, A.; Uva, A.E.; Fiorentino, M.; Mori, G.; Monno, G. Geometry Design Optimization of Functionally Graded Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Mechanobiological Approach. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0146935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashby, M.F. The Mechanical Properties of Cellular Solids. Metall. Trans. A 1983, 14, 1755–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibson, L.A.; Parvanta, S.A.; Jeong, M.; Hornik, R.C. Evaluation of a mass media campaign promoting using help to quit smoking. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2014, 46, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, R.; Feng, X.; Fan, R.; Chen, S.; Song, J.; Gao, L.; Lu, Y. 3D printing of titanium-coated gradient composite lattices for lightweight mandibular prosthesis. Composites Part B 2020, 193, 108057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, J.; Yang, J.; Li, Z.; Zhu, L.; Li, L.; Wang, X. Design and fabrication of graduated porous Ti-based alloy implants for biomedical applications. JAllC 2017, 728, 1043–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.C.; Kuo, C.N.; Shie, M.Y.; Su, Y.L.; Wei, L.J.; Chen, S.Y.; Huang, J.C. Structural design and mechanical response of gradient porous Ti-6Al-4V fabricated by electron beam additive manufacturing. Mater. Des. 2018, 158, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Mao, Z.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, D.Z.; Jiang, J.; Ma, Z. Functionally graded porous scaffolds in multiple patterns: New design method, physical and mechanical properties. Mater. Des. 2018, 160, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, D.; Rong, Q.; Chen, Q. Finite-element design and optimization of a three-dimensional tetrahedral porous titanium scaffold for the reconstruction of mandibular defects. Med. Eng. Phys. 2017, 47, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, H.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Ji, P.; Wang, C. Mechanobiologically optimization of a 3D titanium-mesh implant for mandibular large defect: A simulated study. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 104, 109934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, K.; Liu, Y.; Yao, C.; Zhao, W.; Xu, X. A personalized mandibular implant with supporting and porous structures designed with topology optimization—A case study of canine. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2019, 25, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, R.; Su, Y.; Yang, W.; Dang, X.; Zhang, C.; Du, R.; Zhong, Y.; Chen, W.-M. Novel Design and Optimization of Porous Titanium Structure for Mandibular Reconstruction. Appl. Bionics Biomech. 2022, 2022, 8686670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gümrük, R.; Mines, R.A.W.; Karadeniz, S. Static mechanical behaviours of stainless steel micro-lattice structures under different loading conditions. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 586, 392–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nune, K.C.; Kumar, A.; Misra, R.D.K.; Li, S.J.; Hao, Y.L.; Yang, R. Functional response of osteoblasts in functionally gradient titanium alloy mesh arrays processed by 3D additive manufacturing. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 2017, 150, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, X.P.; Tan, Y.J.; Chow, C.S.L.; Tor, S.B.; Yeong, W.Y. Metallic powder-bed based 3D printing of cellular scaffolds for orthopaedic implants: A state-of-the-art review on manufacturing, topological design, mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2017, 76, 1328–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Z.; Yang, Y.; Xiao, R.; Bai, Y.; Song, C.; Wang, D. Evaluation of topology-optimized lattice structures manufactured via selective laser melting. Mater. Des. 2018, 143, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warnke, P.H.; Douglas, T.; Wollny, P.; Sherry, E.; Steiner, M.; Galonska, S.; Wiltfang, J.; Sivananthan, S. Rapid Prototyping Porous Titanium Alloy Scaffolds Produced by Selective Laser Melting for Bone Tissue Engineering.pdf. Tissue Eng. 2009, 15, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arabnejad, S.; Burnett Johnston, R.; Pura, J.A.; Singh, B.; Tanzer, M.; Pasini, D. High-strength porous biomaterials for bone replacement: A strategy to assess the interplay between cell morphology, mechanical properties, bone ingrowth and manufacturing constraints. Acta Biomater. 2016, 30, 345–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bhering, C.L.; Mesquita, M.F.; Kemmoku, D.T.; Noritomi, P.Y.; Consani, R.L.; Barao, V.A. Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2016, 69, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, H.L.; Su, K.C.; Fuh, L.J.; Chen, M.Y.; Wu, J.; Tsai, M.T.; Hsu, J.T. Biomechanical analysis of a temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis during various clenching tasks. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2015, 43, 1194–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, A.; Mukherjee, K.; Dhara, S.; Gupta, S. Design of porous titanium scaffold for complete mandibular reconstruction: The influence of pore architecture parameters. Comput. Biol. Med. 2019, 108, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarrafpour, B.; Swain, M.; Li, Q.; Zoellner, H. Tooth eruption results from bone remodelling driven by bite forces sensed by soft tissue dental follicles: A finite element analysis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Shin, Y.C. Additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V alloy: A review. Mater. Des. 2019, 164, 107552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, P.; Warner, D.H.; Fatemi, A.; Phan, N. Critical assessment of the fatigue performance of additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V and perspective for future research. Int. J. Fatigue 2016, 85, 130–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, Y.; Gonzalez, J.A.; Kulkarni, P.A.; Nagy, W.W.; Griggs, J.A. Fatigue lifetime prediction of a reduced-diameter dental implant system: Numerical and experimental study. Dent. Mater. 2018, 34, 1299–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hrabe, N.; Gnäupel-Herold, T.; Quinn, T. Fatigue properties of a titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) fabricated via electron beam melting (EBM): Effects of internal defects and residual stress. Int. J. Fatigue 2017, 94, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- | Target Stress (MPa) | Porosity (%) | Peak Stress (MPa) |
---|---|---|---|
Model A | - | 70.00 | 743.44 |
Model B | 700 | 81.86 | 682.79 |
Model C | 600 | 79.63 | 581.78 |
Model D | 500 | 77.68 | 484.79 |
- | Porosity [%] | Peak Stress [MPa] | |
---|---|---|---|
INC | LMOL | ||
Model I | 68.49 | 228.33 | 261.35 |
Model O | 75.32 | 151.20 | 197.37 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, R.; Su, Y.; Yang, W.; Wu, K.; Du, R.; Zhong, Y. A Novel Design Method of Gradient Porous Structure for Stabilized and Lightweight Mandibular Prosthesis. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9090424
Liu R, Su Y, Yang W, Wu K, Du R, Zhong Y. A Novel Design Method of Gradient Porous Structure for Stabilized and Lightweight Mandibular Prosthesis. Bioengineering. 2022; 9(9):424. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9090424
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Renshun, Yuxiong Su, Weifa Yang, Kai Wu, Ruxu Du, and Yong Zhong. 2022. "A Novel Design Method of Gradient Porous Structure for Stabilized and Lightweight Mandibular Prosthesis" Bioengineering 9, no. 9: 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9090424