Biological Detoxification of Aflatoxin B1 by Enterococcus faecium HB2-2

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) contamination in food and feed is a global health and economic threat, necessitating the immediate development of effective strategies to mitigate its negative effects. This study focuses on the isolation and characterization of Enterococcus faecium HB2-2 (E. faecium HB2-2) as a potent AFB1-degrading microorganism, using morphological observation, biochemical profiling, and 16S rRNA sequence analysis. An incubation of E. faecium HB2-2 at 32 °C for 96 h in a pH 10 nutrient broth (NB) medium resulted in a remarkable degradation rate of 90.0% for AFB1. Furthermore, E. faecium HB2-2 demonstrated 82.9% AFB1 degradation rate in the peanut meal, reducing AFB1 levels from 105.1 to 17.9 μg/kg. The AFB1 degradation ability of E. faecium HB2-2 was found to be dependent on the fermentation supernatant. The products of AFB1 degradation by E. faecium HB2-2 were analyzed by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS), and a possible degradation mechanism was proposed based on the identified degradation products. Additionally, cytotoxicity assays revealed a significant reduction in the toxicity of the degradation products compared to the parent AFB1. These findings highlight the potential of E. faecium HB2-2 as a safe and effective method for mitigating AFB1 contamination in food and feed.


Introduction
Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites synthesized by many fungi that commonly infest plants, food, and feed, including Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Fusarium.Mycotoxins typically contaminate agricultural commodities throughout harvest and storage periods, including peanuts, corn, cottonseed, and tree nuts [1].More than 400 mycotoxins have been detected worldwide, according to reports [2].Mycotoxins most frequently encountered are ochratoxin, aflatoxins, zearalenone, deoxynivalenol, and fumonisin [2,3].Their adverse effects are manifold and include reproductive toxicity, immunological toxicity, genetic toxicity, hepatorenal toxicity, and cardiac toxicity [4][5][6].Aflatoxins (AFs) are highly toxic mycotoxins synthesized primarily by filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus nomius, and Aspergillus parasiticus [7,8].Aflatoxins significantly contaminate many types of grains and are widely present in both human meals and animal feed [8].AFs are known for their severe and long-lasting harmful effects, with different symptoms including nausea, vomiting, and stomach discomfort, as well as their ability to cause cancer, birth defects, and liver damage [9].Several distinct AFs architectures have been documented, including aflatoxin B 1 (AFB 1 ), aflatoxin B 2 , aflatoxin G 1 , and aflatoxin G 2 .AFB 1 stands out as the most notable and dangerous variety due to its ability to cause birth defects, genetic mutations, and cancer.As a result, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified it as a Group I carcinogen in humans [10].
The potential contamination of agricultural commodities and crops by AFB 1 is a significant issue, especially regarding peanuts and their products.Peanut meal, a byproduct derived from the oil extraction process, is extensively utilized as animal feed for livestock, poultry, and aquaculture [11,12].However, the presence of AFB 1 in peanut meal poses a significant risk to animal health and can potentially accumulate in the human body through the food chain.Thus, the development of effective and environmentally friendly techniques to eliminate AFB 1 in peanut meal is of utmost importance.
The degradation and removal of AFB 1 from food and feed materials have been extensively studied using various methods, including physical techniques such as heat, absorption, irradiation, and ultraviolet light [9,13,14], chemical measures such as ozonization, ammoniation, and sodium hydroxide [15][16][17], and biological approaches involving microorganisms and enzymes [18][19][20].In recent years, biological approaches such as microbial degradation and enzymatic degradation have gained significant interest due to their high efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and animal-friendly nature.Bacteria such as Rhodococcus erythropolis [21], Myxococcus fulvus [22], and Pseudomonas spp.[23] have been reported to be effective in removing AFB 1 from food and feed.However, the majority of these documented strains have not been employed for the detoxification of aflatoxin in food or feed materials due to concerns over biosafety during actual production.Enterococcus faecium (E.faecium) is a bacterium commonly found in the gastrointestinal system of animals.E. faecium is reported as a probiotic and crucial feed supplement that is extensively utilized in livestock production [24,25].While it has been reported that Enterococcus faecium strains showed 19.3 to 37.5% degradation ability of AFB 1 [26], the research did not investigate the degradation of AFB 1 specifically in the actual sample like peanut meal, its byproducts, and the potential toxicity associated with it.Therefore, it is imperative to thoroughly examine the degrading activity and the mechanism of AFB 1 in peanut meal.
The main objectives of this study were the following: (1) to screen and isolate potential strains exhibiting efficient detoxification of AFB 1 and then identify the optimum strain through physiological, morphological, and 16s rRNA gene sequencing analysis; (2) to enhance the detoxifying potential of this promising strain by refining the fermentation conditions; and (3) to investigate the potential mechanism of AFB 1 degradation by the strain, as well as the toxicity of the degradation products.

Chemicals and Culture Media
The AFB 1 standard, with a purity of 98%, was acquired from Bailing Wei Technology Co., Beijing, China.It was dissolved in methanol at a concentration of 10 mg/kg and utilized as the standard stock solution for this work.The solution was maintained at −20 • C, protected from light.HepG2 and RAW264.7 cells, and DMEM medium were purchased from Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co.,Ltd.(Beijing, China).3-(4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was procured from Invitrogen (Waltham, MA, USA).The coumarin used in this study was of analytical purity and was sourced from Shanpu Chemical Co., Ltd., located in Shanghai, China.Methanol (with high chromatographic purity), acetonitrile (with high chromatographic purity), and unless stated, all the other reagents are purchased from procured from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., located in Shanghai, China, like dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, Protease K, hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide, sodium chloride, and so on.The nutrient broth (NB) medium is prepared by dissolving 1 g of yeast powder (Biosharp life science, Hefei, Anhui, China), 5 g of peptone (Biosharp life science, Hefei, Anhui, China), 15 g of sucrose, and 3 g of beef paste in 1000 mL of ultrapure water.The mixture is then autoclaved at a temperature of 121 • C for 20 min.The Coumarin medium is a minimal salt media and prepared according to Wang et al. [27].It consists of the following ingredients: (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 (5.0 g), KHPO 4 (2.5 g), MgSO 4 (1.0 g), NaHPO 4 -12H 2 O (0.5 g), CaCl 2 (0.1 g), agar (20 g), and coumarin (1 g).All these components are dissolved in 1000 mL of water and sterilized at a temperature of 121 • C for 20 min.

Isolation of AFB 1 -Degrading Strains
A total of 50 soil samples were gathered from grassland soil (Wuhan, China, 2022), rubbish (Wuhan, China, 2022), mildewed peanut (Wuhan, China, 2022), and peanut fields (Huanggang, China, 2022).The samples were collected in sterile plastic sampling bags and stored in an icebox to preserve the original microbial activity.They were then transported directly to the laboratory for the purpose of screening aflatoxin-degrading bacteria.The experimental approach was conducted following the stated methodology with minor alterations [27]. 1 g soil sample was mixed well with 10 mL of sterile water.The mixture was then placed in a rotary shaker and incubated at a temperature of 28 • C for 3 h.Serial dilutions of the bacterial solution were performed, starting from a 10 −1 dilution and going up to a 10 −8 dilution, following the specified method with any necessary adjustments.Subsequently, 100 µL dilution was evenly distributed over the solid plates containing coumarin medium.The plates were then incubated for 12-24 h at a temperature of 28 • C. The color and shape of colonies on plates were examined using a microscope, and then strains were selected and isolated by different colors and shapes.Subsequently, to obtain strains which could grow on the NB agar plate using coumarin as the only carbon source, each of the isolated strains was incubated into a NB agar plate containing 0.1% coumarin at a temperature of 28 • C for 24 h.Then, the isolated strains which could grow on the NB agar plate containing coumarin were streaked successively on a plate to obtain pure culture, which were subsequently preserved in 25% glycerol at a temperature of −80 • C.

Aflatoxin Degradation Assay
The degradation of AFB 1 was conducted in liquid cultures following the procedures outlined, with minor adjustments [28].A single colony of the isolated strain was chosen and then inoculated into a liquid NB media and incubated at 28 • C and placed on a rotary shake (200 rpm) for 12 h.Subsequently, 1 mL of the fermentation liquid of strain HB2-2 was mixed with 9 mL of fresh NB liquid medium at a 10% inoculation rate.Subsequently, 120 µL of the standard stock solution of AFB 1 (10 mg/kg) was mixed with the fermentation broth of strain HB2-2, and AFB 1 mixed with NB medium without HB2-2 strain was taken as the control group.The resulting combination was then subjected to incubation in a shaking incubator at 200 rpm, maintaining a temperature of 28 • C for 48 h.Following a 2-day degradation process, the remaining AFB 1 was extracted from the fermentation mixture or NB medium (control group), and subsequently quantified using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as described in Section 2.4.The concentration of AFB 1 in the control group (NB medium without HB2-2 strain) was quantified 113.0 µg/kg, the corresponding recovery rate was 94.17%.

Extraction and Detection of Residual AFB 1
The experimental method of AFB 1 extraction and detection was conducted according to the determination of aflatoxins B and G in food of national food safety standard (GB 5009.[29].The standard specifies that the limit of detection (LOD) of AFB1 for this method is 0.03 µg/kg, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) is 0.1 µg/kg.The remaining AFB 1 was extracted from the fermentation broth using immunoaffinity columns manufactured by zhongke huiren Science and technology Co., Ltd.(Beijing, China) for quantitative analysis.The product specification of immunoaffinity columns indicates that the recovery rate of AFB 1 is greater than 90%, while in this study, the recovery rate of AFB 1 is 94.17%.The process involved the removal of microbial cells from the fermentation mixture through centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 min, obtaining the supernatant.Subsequently, 2 mL of the fermentation supernatant was mixed with 8 mL of aqueous methanol (V/V, Methanol/water = 7:3) and placed in a shaker (200 rpm) at room temperature for 20 min.The mixture was then centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min, leading to the separation of the precipitation, which was discarded, and the retention of the supernatant solution.A total of 4 mL of the supernatant solution was combined with 23 mL of PBS/Tween-20 (1%) buffer.Subsequently, the mixture was gradually flowed through the immunoaffinity column.The residual AFB 1 was then eluted using 1 mL of methanol, and the resulting solution was filtered through a 0.22 µm organic ultrafiltration membrane.The quantity of AFB 1 was measured using an HPLC system (Agilent 1260 II, Palo Alto, CA, USA) that had an AQ C 18 reverse phase column (length 150 mm, internal diameter 4.6 mm, and pore size 5 µm).A fluorescence detector (Agilent, Palo Alto, USA) was used, along with a post column derivatization system (Photochemical Derivative Instrument type PHRED-HR, zhongke huiren Science and technology Co., Ltd.Beijing, China) to enhance the sensitivity of fluorescence.The injection volume was 10 µL, the column temperature was kept at 40 • C. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of water, methanol, and acetonitrile in a ratio of 55:35:10 (v/v/v) and flowed at a rate of 0.9 mL/min.The spectra's excitation and emission wavelengths were 360 and 440 nm, respectively [29,30].The experiments were replicated three times, the HPLC spectrogram of AFB 1 in the supporting information Figure S1 (retention time was 18.05 min), and the standard curve of AFB 1 was showed in Figure S2 of the support information.The degradation activity of AFB 1 was determined using the following formula.
where A 1 represents the amount of residual AFB 1 in the fermentation supernatant solution treated with HB2-2 strain, and A 2 is the control and represents the amount of AFB 1 in the NB media without HB2-2 strain.

Identification of the HB2-2 Strain
In order to determine the morphological and biochemical traits of the isolated HB2-2 strain, a series of physiological and biochemical tests were conducted following the reported procedure [15].The strain HB2-2, which was kept separate from other strains, was inoculated into NB solid medium using a slanted line technique.The culture was then incubated at a temperature of 28 • C for 24 h.A small amount of bacteria were selected for Gram staining using a Gram Staining Kit (Biosharp life science, Hefei, Anhui, China), and the cellular structure and staining outcomes were examined using a microscope.In addition, physiological and biochemical tests were carried out followed by Schaad [31].Scanning electron microscopy was used to better observed the cellular morphology of the bacteria.The bacterial strain HB2-2 was grown in an incubator shaker at a speed of 200 rpm and a temperature of 28 • C for 24 h.The strain HB2-2 cells were collected by centrifugation at a speed of 10,000 rpm for 10 min and washed with PBS three times.The shape of the HB2-2 cells was fixed by adding 2.5% glutaraldehyde at a temperature of 4 • C overnight, followed by three washes with PBS as described in previous studies [32,33].The HB2-2 cells were dehydrated using a succession of gradient alcohols (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, 100%) and then freeze-dried, following the method described in previous publication [34,35].A small amount of strain HB2-2 sample was dispersed onto the conductive adhesive surface.Subsequently, the sample which had not adhered to the adhesive was removed using an ear wash ball.Then, the treated surface was given a spray gold coverage for 30 s.The cellular morphology of strain HB2-2 were subsequently observed using a Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope S-4800 (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
In addition, the analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence was conducted using the methods described in the literature [18,36].In summary, the whole DNA from strain HB2-2 was obtained using a Bacterial DNA extraction kit (SBS Gene, Shanghai, China), following the manufacturer instruction, and then amplified using Taq PCR Master Mix kit (SBS Gene, Shanghai, China) with universal primers specific to bacterial 16S rDNA, 7F 5 ′ -CAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCT-3 ′ , and 1540R 5 ′ -CAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCT-3 ′ [37].
The PCR protocol was established with the following conditions: an initial denaturation step at 94 • C for 4 min one cycle, followed by denaturation at 94 • C for 45 s, annealing at 55 • C for 45 s, extension at 72 • C for 1 min, and a total of 30 cycles.A final extension step was performed at 72 • C for 10 min.The amplified products underwent sequencing and the sequences were compared by Blast using GenBank database in NCBI.MEGA6.0 software was applied to construct phylogenetic tree for sequences with high homology [15,38].

Impact of Various Fermentation Conditions on the Degradation of AFB 1
The AFB 1 -degrading activity of HB2-2 strain was influenced by various fermentation conditions, such as amounts of the strain, fermentation time, temperature, and pH.Therefore, various AFB 1 degradation studies were conducted under different culture conditions to determine the optimal parameters for AFB 1 degradation of strain HB2-2.The strain HB2-2 was incubated in 20 mL NB medium at 200 rpm at 28 • C for 12 h reaching a cell density to OD600 = 1.2.Subsequently, 1 mL of the fermentation liquid of strain HB2-2 was added to 9 mL of fresh NB medium, and mixed with 120 µL of the standard stock solution of AFB 1 (10 mg/kg).The mixture was then incubated in different culture conditions.The control group was taken as the AFB 1 mixed with NB medium without HB2-2 strain, and the concentration of AFB 1 in the control group was quantified 113.0 µg/kg.To determine the ideal fermentation temperature, the mixture was incubated at different temperatures (20, 24, 28, 32, and 35 • C) for 48 h.After incubation, the fermentation mixture was collected and the remaining AFB 1 was extracted and analyzed using HPLC.The impact of varying initial inoculum amounts of strain on the breakdown of AFB 1 was assessed by adding varied amounts of fermentation liquid (1%, 5%, 10%, and 20%) to fresh NB medium.The medium was then spiked with AFB 1 and cultured at a temperature of 32 • C for 48 h.The optimal pH was obtained by altering the pH (1 mole/L HCL or 10 mole/L NaOH) of the NB media to a range of 2.0-11.0 using a pH meter (METTLER TOLEDO, Zurich, Switzerland) before autoclaving, and incubating it at a temperature of 32 • C for 48 h.To investigate the impact of fermentation period on the breakdown of AFB 1 , the fermentation mixture of strain HB2-2 was incubated with AFB 1 at a temperature of 32 • C for various durations of 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h, The control group was taken as the AFB 1 (118.3µg/kg) mixed with NB medium without HB2-2 strain.

Degradation of AFB 1 by Strain HB2-2 in Peanut Meal
The strain HB2-2 was further applied to eliminate AFB 1 in moldy peanut meal.The moldy peanut meal was collected and dried in oven at 65-70 • C, and ground with a blender.The fermentation liquid of strain HB2-2 was prepared as the mentioned procedures in Section 2.3, and the peanut meal contaminated AFB 1 (105.1 µg/kg) was mixed with fermentation liquid of strain HB2-2 at different material-to-liquid ratio (peanut meal/fermentation liquid, 1:1, 1:5, 1:10, 1:15, 1:20 and 1:30).The mixtures were adjusted pH to 10 and incubated at 32 • C for 96 h, under the post-optimized fermentation conditions obtained in Section 2.6, and the residual AFB 1 was extracted and analyzed by HPLC.

The Different Cellular Fractions of Strain HB2-2 on AFB 1 Degradation
In order to assess the impact of various cellular components of the isolated strain HB2-2 on the breakdown of AFB 1 , culture supernatants, cell suspensions, and cell extracts were generated following the methodology outlined in a previous work [39].The isolated strain HB2-2 was cultured at a temperature of 28 • C for 48 h in NB medium.The culture supernatant and cell pellet were collected and isolated using centrifugation at a speed of 10,000 rpm for 20 min at a temperature of 4 • C. Following centrifugation, the culture supernatant was filtered using a sterile 0.22 µm pore size filter and utilized for subsequent studies.The bacterial pellet was rinsed twice and resuspended in phosphate buffer, serving as the cell resuspension solution for further studies.To acquire the intracellular extracts, a part of the resuspended cell was disrupted using an Ultrasonic Cell Disruption System (Scientz, Ningbo, China) in an ice bath.The disrupted cell was then centrifuged at a speed of 10,000 rpm for 20 min at a temperature of 4 • C. Finally, the extract was filtered through a sterile filter with a pore size of 0.22 µm [40].The culture supernatants, cell suspensions, and intracellular extracts were mixed with AFB 1 , respectively.AFB 1 mixed with NB medium without HB2-2 strain was taken as the control group, The groups were subjected to incubation at a temperature of 32 • C for 96 h in order to assess the degradation capacity of the various fractions.The remaining AFB 1 was then extracted and quantified using HPLC, as previously described.And the concentration of AFB 1 in the control group was quantified 113.0 µg/kg.

The Impact of Heat Inactivation, Proteinase K, and Proteinase K Combined with Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) Treatments on the AFB 1 Degradation Activity of the Fermentation Supernatant
In order to ascertain if the degradation of AFB 1 was facilitated by proteins or other metabolites in the fermentation supernatant, additional experiments were conducted on the culture supernatant treated with heat, proteinase K, and SDS + proteinase K, following established protocols [41][42][43].Proteins undergo denaturation and deactivation when exposed to elevated temperatures [27].Protease K has the ability to hydrolyze and deactivate proteins, while SDS can deactivate proteins by disrupting their tertiary and quaternary structures [44,45].For the process of heat treatment, the liquid remaining after fermentation was subjected to boiling (about 98 • C) for 1 h using a water bath.During the proteinase K treatment, a concentration of 1 mg/mL of proteinase K was mixed with the bacterial fermentation supernatant and incubated at a temperature of 55 • C for 3 h.To perform proteinase K and SDS treatment, a mixture of 1 mg/mL proteinase K and 1% SDS was subjected to simultaneous treatment at a temperature of 55 • C for 3 h.Each fermentation supernatant was enriched with 200 ng/mL of AFB 1 and then incubated at a temperature of 32 • C for 96 h.The control was made using the fermentation supernatant that was not treated.The retrieval and examination of AFB 1 were carried out according to the procedures outlined in Section 2.4.

Analysis and Identification of Degraded Products
A total of 1 mL of fermentation liquid of strain HB2-2 was combined with 9 mL of NB medium.Subsequently, AFB 1 storage solution was added until the final concentration reached 0.2 µg/mL.The mixture was subsequently incubated at a temperature of 32 • C for 48 h.The fermentation supernatant underwent centrifugation at a speed of 10,000 rpm for 10 min at a temperature of 4 • C. It was then filtered using a sterile filter with a pore size of 0.22 µm from Tianjin Jinteng experimental Equipment Co., LTD (Tianjing, China).The degradative compounds of AFB 1 by HB2-2 strain were complex mixture, for LC-MS study.Then, a preliminary purification was performed using the immunoaffinity columns, which were used in the AFB 1 extraction experiment.Subsequently, the complex mixture of AFB 1 degradative compounds was passed through an immunoaffinity column, following the procedure outlined in Section 2.4.The degraded products were gradually separated by the addition of methanol, and the resulting solution was evaporated under N 2 gas at a temperature of 50 • C. The desiccated substance was diluted in 1 mL of methanol, then filtered using a 0.22 µm microporous filter membrane.The resulting concentrated solution of degradation products was utilized for subsequent analysis.The control group was treated identically to the experimental group, with no exposure to strain HB2-2.The investigation of AFB 1 and its degradation products was conducted utilizing the Ultimate 3000 UHPLC-Q Exactive LC-MS System, manufactured by Thermo Scientific in the United States.In the process of chromatographic analysis, a volume of 5 µL of the test sample was inoculated onto an Atlantis T3 C 18 column with dimensions of 100 mm × 3.0 mm and a particle size of 3.0 µm, manufactured by Waters Corporation in the United States.The mobile phase consisted of a 0.1% formic acid water solution and acetonitrile in a 1:1 ratio, and was performed at a consistent flow rate of 0.4 mL/min.The column temperature was maintained at 30 • C. The Thermo Scientific Q Exactive mass spec-trometer system was utilized for the purpose of conducting mass spectroscopy.The specific parameters used were electro-spray ionization, ion source HESI, positive polarity (ES + ), capillary voltage of 3.8 kV, and capillary temperature of 320 • C. The mass spectrometer was operated using the Fullms/dd-ms2 scan mode.An electrospray ionization interface detector was utilized to measure the mass of the separated products within the mass range (m/z) of 50-600.The obtained specific m/z values were identified based on the literature representing the AFB 1 -degraded products by various microorganisms.Furthermore, the hypothetical degradation pathway of AFB 1 was speculated based on the degraded products [44].

Cytotoxicity Assay of the Degradation Products of AFB 1
The cytotoxicity of AFB 1 and its degradation products were assessed by evaluating the cell viability of HepG2 and RAW264.7 cells [45,46].The degradation products of AFB 1 were isolated from the bacterial fermentation supernatant using an immunoaffinity column.The extracted compounds were then dried under N 2 gas at 50 • C. The remaining degradation products were dissolved in 100 µL of DMSO and 10 mL of DMEM medium containing 10% FBS for subsequent studies.The cryopreserved HepG2 cells and Raw264.7 cells were revived, treated with trypsin for digestion, and cultured in DMEM medium (10% FBS) until they reached the logarithmic growth phase.Subsequently, they were transferred into 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 10 4 cells per well and incubated at 37 • C under 5% CO 2 for 24 h.The liquid in the 96-well plate was removed, and 100 µL of DMEM medium (10% FBS) containing degradation products of AFB 1 was added.Subsequently, the 96-well plate was incubated at a temperature of 37 • C with a 5% CO 2 for durations of 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, respectively.The control group was incubated with 100 µL of DMEM medium per well.Afterwards, cell viability was assessed using the MTT method.Specifically, 10 µL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL) was added to each well and incubated for an additional 4 h.The supernatant was then withdrawn and 100 µL of DMSO was added, followed by gentle shaking for 10 min.The cell viability was assessed by quantifying the absorbance at 590 nm, and the rate of cell growth inhibition was computed using the following formula.

Cell Growth inhibition rate%
The sample consisted of DMEM containing AFB 1 or its degraded products, while the control consisted of DMEM without AFB 1 or its degraded products.

Data Analysis
The tests were conducted in three replicates, unless otherwise specified.The data in this research were analyzed and graphed using Origin 7.5 software, and the findings were presented as the mean value plus or minus the standard deviation.One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and correlation analysis were employed to analyze the data.Duncan's multiple range test was chosen to locate the differences between means, and a significance level of 5% (p < 0.05) was considered acceptable.

Screening of AFB 1 -Degrading Strains
In this investigation, a total of 50 soil samples were collected from grassland soil, garbage, mildewed peanut, and peanut fields.Coumarin serves as the fundamental molecular framework for all aflatoxins, and is regarded as a more cost-effective and safer alternative for a AFB 1 degradation microbe.Consequently, coumarin media was employed to identify microorganisms capable of breaking down AFB 1 , using coumarin as the sole source of carbon according to a reported study [47].The solution of soil samples was diluted and evenly distributed over a solid medium containing 0.1% coumarin.A total of 43 strains were isolated on the plate following incubation at 28 • C for 48 h.For AFB 1 -degrading strains screening, all the isolated 43 strains were incubated with AFB 1 at a concentration of 113.0 µg/kg at 28 • C for 48 h, respectively.Additionally, the AFB 1 degradation abilities of strains were presented in Figure 1, 12 strains showed AFB 1 degradation ability to some extent, from 4.1% to 40.3%.Similarly, a total of 65 bacterial isolates were effectively screened from 119 biological samples utilizing 0.1% coumarin as the only carbon source [48].In an early investigation, 43 single-colony bacterial isolates were isolated from 247 samples taken from different sources using coumarin media, and all of which were able to decrease AFB 1 to variable degrees [49].The bacterium HB2-2 isolated from soil sample demonstrated 40.3% AFB 1 -degrading activity and was selected for further research.
diluted and evenly distributed over a solid medium containing 0.1% coumarin.A total of 43 strains were isolated on the plate following incubation at 28 °C for 48 h.For AFB1degrading strains screening, all the isolated 43 strains were incubated with AFB1 at a concentration of 113.0 µg/kg at 28 °C for 48 h, respectively.Additionally, the AFB1 degradation abilities of strains were presented in Figure 1, 12 strains showed AFB1 degradation ability to some extent, from 4.1% to 40.3%.Similarly, a total of 65 bacterial isolates were effectively screened from 119 biological samples utilizing 0.1% coumarin as the only carbon source [48].In an early investigation, 43 single-colony bacterial isolates were isolated from 247 samples taken from different sources using coumarin media, and all of which were able to decrease AFB1 to variable degrees [49].The bacterium HB2-2 isolated from soil sample demonstrated 40.3% AFB1-degrading activity and was selected for further research.

Physiological, Morphological and 16s rRNA Characterization of Strain HB2-2
The morphological, biochemical and 16s rRNA gene sequencing characteristics of the isolated strain HB2-2 were further examined.As shown in Figure 2A, the colonies of strain HB2-2 cultured on NB media exhibited a spherical morphology, characterized by welldefined borders and an opaque, creamy white appearance with a slightly lighter hue on the anterior side.They were elevated at the center, displaying a smooth surface and a wet texture, facilitating easy pick up, and the Gram stain of strain HB2-2 was positive, as shown in Figure 2B.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was utilized to study the fine structure of the strain HB2-2 (Figure 2C, D).The cells of strain HB2-2 were complete spheroids with a smooth surface.Furthermore, certain physiological and biochemical tests were carried out in Table 1.Subsequently, the online BLAST search of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the bacteria HB2-2 demonstrated a 99% resemblance to Enterococcus faecium DSM 20477.A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was generated based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Figure 3).Finally, on the basis of morphological, physiological and investigation of the

Physiological, Morphological and 16s rRNA Characterization of Strain HB2-2
The morphological, biochemical and 16s rRNA gene sequencing characteristics of the isolated strain HB2-2 were further examined.As shown in Figure 2A, the colonies of strain HB2-2 cultured on NB media exhibited a spherical morphology, characterized by well-defined borders and an opaque, creamy white appearance with a slightly lighter hue on the anterior side.They were elevated at the center, displaying a smooth surface and a wet texture, facilitating easy pick up, and the Gram stain of strain HB2-2 was positive, as shown in Figure 2B.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was utilized to study the fine structure of the strain HB2-2 (Figure 2C,D).The cells of strain HB2-2 were complete spheroids with a smooth surface.Furthermore, certain physiological and biochemical tests were carried out in Table 1.Subsequently, the online BLAST search of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the bacteria HB2-2 demonstrated a 99% resemblance to Enterococcus faecium DSM 20477.A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was generated based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Figure 3).Finally, on the basis of morphological, physiological and investigation of the 16s rRNA gene sequence, the isolated strain HB2-2 was identified as Enterococcus Faecium (E.faecium HB2-2).The results were in keeping with a recent study, in which, two probiotic E. faecium M74 and E. faecium EF031 were reported to degrade AFB 1 [26].Enterococcus faecium is a member of lactic acid bacteria mostly found in nature, especially in foods and has various applications in the processing of some fermented dairy products, and which was reported as a probiotic used in food and feed to effectively improve animal immunity [1,16].
Foods 2024, 13, 1887 9 of 20 cium is a member of lactic acid bacteria mostly found in nature, especially in foods and has various applications in the processing of some fermented dairy products, and which was reported as a probiotic used in food and feed to effectively improve animal immunity [1,16].cium is a member of lactic acid bacteria mostly found in nature, especially in foods and has various applications in the processing of some fermented dairy products, and which was reported as a probiotic used in food and feed to effectively improve animal immunity [1,16].

Effect of Fermentation Conditions on the Degradation of AFB 1
To optimize the degradation efficiency of the strain, varied parameters of temperature, initial inoculum quantities, fermentation pH and time on the breakdown of AFB 1 were further studied.Microbes were generally temperature sensitive and changed at different temperatures.Therefore, the impact of fermentation temperature on AFB 1 degradation was first studied.As can be seen in the results presented in Figure 4A, the isolated E. faecium HB2-2 demonstrated evident AFB 1 degradation activity (from 47.0 to 53.5%) at all the examined fermentation temperatures in the range of 20-35 • C, which indicated E. faecium HB2-2 could grow and degrade AFB 1 in a wide range of temperatures.E. faecium HB2-2 had the highest AFB 1 degradation performance, reaching 53.5% at 32 • C, with the remaining AFB 1 level dropping from 113.0 to 52.6 µg/kg following a 48 h fermentation period.Some previous investigations revealed that the AFB 1 -degrading activities of microorganisms were related to their fermentation temperature.Bacillus licheniformis CFR1 was observed to have a maximal AFB 1 degradation activity at 37 another investigation [50], Bacillus subtilis showed a 60% breakdown of AFB1 after 96 h of incubation.All of these investigations revealed the time-dependent degradation of AFB1, and showed that time duration was required to achieve maximum degradation.

Degradation of AFB1 by E. faecium HB2-2 in Peanut Meal
To evaluate the AFB1 degradation ratio in the actual food and feed samples, E. faecium HB2-2 was further applied to moldy peanut meal containing AFB1.The AFB1 content of contaminated peanut meal used in this investigation was confirmed to be 105.1 µg/kg.The AFB1-contaminated peanut was employed as a fermentation substrate, combined with E. faecium HB2-2 at varying solid/liquid ratios (peanut meal/fermentation broth = 1:1 to 1:30), then it was incubated at 32 °C for 96 h.The residual AFB1 in peanut meal was extracted The degradation rate of AFB 1 was similarly impacted by the varied amounts of initial inoculum of E. faecium HB2-2.Therefore, the influence of the inoculation amount on the degradation of AFB 1 was also studied.The experimental results are shown in Figure 4B; E. faecium HB2-2 observably displayed AFB 1 -degrading activity under all levels of initial inoculum, and the residual AFB 1 was lowered considerably following treatment with E. faecium HB2-2.When the inoculation amount was 10% of NB medium, the AFB 1 breakdown rate of HB2-2 strain was 58.9%, and the residual amount of AFB 1 was reduced from 113.0 to 46.4 µg/kg.These results suggested that the optimal inoculation quantity of strain HB2-2 was 10% of NB medium.
The pH value of the medium not only impacts the growth of E. faecium HB2-2, but also impacts the AFB 1 -degrading activity.As demonstrated in Figure 4C, the AFB 1 degradation of E. faecium HB2-2 was related with the pH values of fermentation medium.E. faecium HB2-2 demonstrated moderate AFB 1 degradation ability (22.9-45.4%)at the pH levels of 2.0 to 7.0, whereas the degradation efficiency of E. faecium HB2-2 improved (49.8-69.3%)at pH values between 8.0 to 11.0, showing that the strain grew more successfully under alkaline conditions than in a neutral or acid environment.Hence, the ideal pH for strain HB2-2 was determined to be 10.0, the corresponding AFB 1 degradation was 69.3%, and residual AFB 1 concentration reduced from 113.0 to 34.7 µg/kg.These results were in keeping with the previous findings [44].Bacillus albus strain YUN5 isolated from traditional Korean cuisine showed little AFB 1 degradation at pH 2 and 4, but the greatest degradation of AFB 1 at pH 10.These results suggested AFB 1 degradation efficiency of the isolates altered substantially with fluctuation in pH values, and slightly alkaline circumstances may be advantageous to the breakdown of AFB 1 by E. faecium HB2-2.
Fermentation length had a vital influence in the process.Thus, this inquiry explored the impact of fermentation length on AFB 1 degradation of E. faecium HB2-2 in Figure 4D.The data revealed that when fermentation period prolonged from 24 to 120 h, the AFB 1 degradation rate of E. faecium HB2-2 from 63.0% to 90.0%.At the ideal fermentation time of 96 h, the AFB 1 breakdown rate by E. faecium HB2-2 reached 90.0%, with residual AFB 1 dropping to 11.9 µg/kg.The result was consistent with the earlier research [44], where Bacillus albus YUN5 showed 37.9% AFB 1 degradation on day 3, and 66.6% on day 7.In another investigation [50], Bacillus subtilis showed a 60% breakdown of AFB 1 after 96 h of incubation.All of these investigations revealed the timedependent degradation of AFB 1 , and showed that time duration was required to achieve maximum degradation.

Degradation of AFB 1 by E. faecium HB2-2 in Peanut Meal
To evaluate the AFB 1 degradation ratio in the actual food and feed samples, E. faecium HB2-2 was further applied to moldy peanut meal containing AFB 1 .The AFB 1 content of contaminated peanut meal used in this investigation was confirmed to be 105.1 µg/kg.The AFB 1 -contaminated peanut was employed as a fermentation substrate, combined with E. faecium HB2-2 at varying solid/liquid ratios (peanut meal/fermentation broth = 1:1 to 1:30), then it was incubated at 32 • C for 96 h.The residual AFB 1 in peanut meal was extracted using immunoaffinity columns and quantified by an HPLC-fluorescent detector with pre-column derivatization.The results are shown in Figure 5; E. faecium HB2-2 revealed significant degrading activity (47.7-82.9%) of AFB 1 in peanut meal, and the degradation rate showed a growing trend with the change in the solid/liquid ratio.When the ratio of material to liquid was 1:20, the breakdown rate of AFB 1 in peanut meal was 82.9%, and the residual amount of AFB 1 in peanut meal was reduced from 105.1 to 17.9 µg/kg.These results suggest the ratio of solid/liquid is an essential element impacting the microbial breakdown of AFB 1 , and adequate ratio of solid to liquid can boost the metabolism and proliferation of the strain.Similarly, an early study showed that the biological degradation technique of aflatoxins in peanut meal, which could approach 100% destruction of aflatoxins by combining heat treatment with anaerobic solid fermentation of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp.Bulgaricus [19].In the investigation [15], Bacillus subtilis UTBSP1 isolated from pistachio nuts could eliminate 95% of AFB 1 in the pulverized kernel of pistachio.All of these results revealed that microorganisms might be used for removing AFB 1 from food and feed.
pulverized kernel of pistachio.All of these results revealed that microorganisms migh used for removing AFB1 from food and feed.

Different Cellular Fractions of E. faecium HB2-2 on AFB1 Degradation
The effect of culture supernatants, cell suspensions and cell extracts of the isolated faecium HB2-2 on AFB1 degradation were further investigated.As shown in Figure 6, a incubation with AFB1 for 96 h, components of culture supernatants, cell suspensions a cell extracts showed varied breakdown activities for AFB1.The fermentation supernat of E. faecium HB2-2 demonstrated considerably higher AFB1 degradation activity (59.7 than cell suspension (27.0%) and cell extracts (32.7%).The results suggested that the bre down of AFB1 by E. faecium HB2-2 largely depended on fermentation supernatant, and AFB1 degradation components mainly existed in the extracellular supernatant produ in the fermentation process of E. faecium HB2-2.The result was congruent with other e lier publications.The culture supernatant of Bacillus licheniformis CFR1 showed a ma mum AFB1 reduction of 93.6% after incubation, relative to 12.3% and 8.5% when trea with cell extract and viable cells [9], respectively.The bacteria cells of Bacillus sub UTBSP1 isolated from pistachio nuts revealed no ability to remove AFB1; however, culture supernatant could significantly degrade 78.39% content of AFB1 [15].Anot study indicated that the culture supernatant of Bacillus albus YUN5 demonstrated 76.2 degradation for AFB1, whereas relatively minimal AFB1 degradation were found in intracellular fraction and viable cells [44].This research suggests that certain compone found in the culture supernatant of E. faecium HB2-2 may play a role in the degradation AFB1.

Different Cellular Fractions of E. faecium HB2-2 on AFB 1 Degradation
The effect of culture supernatants, cell suspensions and cell extracts of the isolated E. faecium HB2-2 on AFB 1 degradation were further investigated.As shown in Figure 6, after incubation with AFB 1 for 96 h, components of culture supernatants, cell suspensions and cell extracts showed varied breakdown activities for AFB 1 .The fermentation supernatant of E. faecium HB2-2 demonstrated considerably higher AFB 1 degradation activity (59.7%) than cell suspension (27.0%) and cell extracts (32.7%).The results suggested that the breakdown of AFB 1 by E. faecium HB2-2 largely depended on fermentation supernatant, and the AFB 1 degradation components mainly existed in the extracellular supernatant produced in the fermentation process of E. faecium HB2-2.The result was congruent with other earlier publications.The culture supernatant of Bacillus licheniformis CFR1 showed a maximum AFB 1 reduction of 93.6% after incubation, relative to 12.3% and 8.5% when treated with cell extract and viable cells [9], respectively.The bacteria cells of Bacillus subtilis UTBSP1 isolated from pistachio nuts revealed no ability to remove AFB 1 ; however, the culture supernatant could significantly degrade 78.39% content of AFB 1 [15].Another study indicated that the culture supernatant of Bacillus albus YUN5 demonstrated 76.28% degradation for AFB 1 , whereas relatively minimal AFB 1 degradation were found in the intracellular fraction and viable cells [44].This research suggests that certain components found in the culture supernatant of E. faecium HB2-2 may play a role in the degradation of AFB 1 .

Effect of Heat Inactivation, Proteinase K and Proteinase K + SDS Treatments of Fermentation Supernatant on the AFB1 Degradation Activity
From the studies conducted above, it was obvious that the AFB1 degradation was greatest in the culture supernatant in comparison with cell and cell extracts of E. faecium HB2-2.Hence, the fermentation supernatant of strain HB2-2 was supplied with different treatments to detect the components that were responsible for AFB1 degradation.The AFB1 breakdown activity of fermentation supernatant treated with heat, proteinase K, and SDS were examined, respectively, and the findings were displayed in Figure 7. Surprisingly, the AFB1 degradation rate of fermentation supernatant treated with heat inactivation was only 7.3%, which was dropped considerably compared with the untreated supernatant with 59.7% AFB1 degradation activity.In addition, the breakdown rates of the fermentation supernatant treated with protease K and protease K+SDS were 14.4% and 5.1%, respectively.This result clearly suggested degradation of AFB1 was probably related to the enzyme generated by E. faecium HB2-2 in the culture supernatant.After protease K, protease K+SDS and heat treatment, the protease secreted by strain HB2-2 was denatured, and AFB1 degradation activity of the fermentation supernatant was lost.These findings are in keeping with a previously published report, revealing that the AFB1 degradation in the culture supernatant of Bacillus licheniformis CFR1 dropped considerably from 88.6% to 26.9% following treatment with proteinase K [44].Another study found that 88.0% of AFB1 were degraded by the culture supernatant of Trichoderma reesei; however, AFB1 degradation fell dramatically to 69.6% following treatment with proteinase K, and declined to 29.4% after treatment with proteinase K plus SDS [51].Similar results were also reported in other AFB1-degrading bacteria, such as Mycobacterium fluoranthenivorans, Bacillus velezensis DY3108, Staphylococcus sp.[18,52,53].These data revealed that enzymes or proteins played a crucial role in AFB1 degradation.However, more studies are required to identify the enzyme or enzyme systems responsible for the biodegradation.

Effect of Heat Inactivation, Proteinase K and Proteinase K + SDS Treatments of Fermentation Supernatant on the AFB 1 Degradation Activity
From the studies conducted above, it was obvious that the AFB 1 degradation was greatest in the culture supernatant in comparison with cell and cell extracts of E. faecium HB2-2.Hence, the fermentation supernatant of strain HB2-2 was supplied with different treatments to detect the components that were responsible for AFB 1 degradation.The AFB 1 breakdown activity of fermentation supernatant treated with heat, proteinase K, and SDS were examined, respectively, and the findings were displayed in Figure 7. Surprisingly, the AFB 1 degradation rate of fermentation supernatant treated with heat inactivation was only 7.3%, which was dropped considerably compared with the untreated supernatant with 59.7% AFB 1 degradation activity.In addition, the breakdown rates of the fermentation supernatant treated with protease K and protease K+SDS were 14.4% and 5.1%, respectively.This result clearly suggested degradation of AFB 1 was probably related to the enzyme generated by E. faecium HB2-2 in the culture supernatant.After protease K, protease K+SDS and heat treatment, the protease secreted by strain HB2-2 was denatured, and AFB 1 degradation activity of the fermentation supernatant was lost.These findings are in keeping with a previously published report, revealing that the AFB 1 degradation in the culture supernatant of Bacillus licheniformis CFR1 dropped considerably from 88.6% to 26.9% following treatment with proteinase K [44].Another study found that 88.0% of AFB 1 were degraded by the culture supernatant of Trichoderma reesei; however, AFB 1 degradation fell dramatically to 69.6% following treatment with proteinase K, and declined to 29.4% after treatment with proteinase K plus SDS [51].Similar results were also reported in other AFB 1 -degrading bacteria, such as Mycobacterium fluoranthenivorans, Bacillus velezensis DY3108, Staphylococcus sp.[18,52,53].These data revealed that enzymes or proteins played a crucial role in AFB 1 degradation.However, more studies are required to identify the enzyme or enzyme systems responsible for the biodegradation.

Identification of the AFB1 Degradation Products
LC-MS analysis is often used to examine the degradation products of AFB1.As indicated in Figure 8A, the ion peaks at m/z 313 [M+H] + and 335 [M+Na] + related to AFB1 were discovered in the mass spectrum of the control group (NB media with AFB1), these distinctive peaks were also founded in the mass spectrum of AFB1 treated with E. faecium HB2-2 (Figure 8B), and are attributable to residual AFB1.These characteristic peaks results were in agreement with shu et al. who discovered particular ion peaks of AFB1 with m/z 313, 335, and 647 in the complete mass spectrum of AFB1 degradation products degraded by Bacillus velezensis DY3108 [52].Wang et al. observed the specific ion peaks of AFB1 at m/z 313 [M+H] + and m/z 335 [M+Na] + in the fermentative mixture by fast biodegradation of AFB1 by metabolites of Fusarium sp.WCQ3361 [27].Additionally, LC-MS analysis indicated multiple ion peaks at distinct m/z values related to complicated degradation products of AFB1 in the mass spectrum of the E. faecium HB2-2-treated group.The primary ion peaks of products at m/z 331 (P1, C17H15O7), 287 (P2, C16H15O5), 249 (P3, C14H17O4) in Figure 8B-D).Subsequently, the likely degraded products of AFB1 were postulated and a tentative degradation pathway of AFB1 was created based on the tiny fragments.As illustrated in Figure 9, the hydrolysis reaction of the lactone ring in AFB1 structure catalyzed by enzymes generated by HB2-2 resulted in a product P1 with m/z 331 (C17H14O7).The hydrolysis was then followed by decarboxylation of the open lactone ring, and P1 was further transformed into compound P2 at m/z 287 (C16H14O5) by cleaving the lactone ring by the removal of CO2.Subsequently, P2 product was further converted into compound P3 with m/z 249 (C14H16O4) by deleting the furan rings of AFB1.These LC-MS data demonstrated the susceptibility of the AFB1 lactone ring and furan rings against E. faecium HB2-2.Some prior research claimed the lactone ring structure in AFB1 is easily hydrolyzed, Eshelli et al. disclosed the breakdown of the terminal lactone ring of AFB1 to create a carboxylic acid product with a m/z value of 331, and the product with a m/z value of 287 after decarboxylic reaction [54].Wang et al. reported an AFB1-degrading bacteria Escherichia coli CG1061 isolated from chicken cecum, the products of AFB1 were examined by UPLC Q-TOF MS and the m/z ion peaks at 287 was identified as the probable degradation product [55].A similar process, in accordance with our results, was observed in other studies showing the biological degradation of AFB1 by microorganism [19,[56][57][58].8B-D).Subsequently, the likely degraded products of AFB 1 were postulated and a tentative degradation pathway of AFB 1 was created based on the tiny fragments.As illustrated in Figure 9, the hydrolysis reaction of the lactone ring in AFB 1 structure catalyzed by enzymes generated by HB2-2 resulted in a product P 1 with m/z 331 (C 17 H 14 O 7 ).The hydrolysis was then followed by decarboxylation of the open lactone ring, and P 1 was further transformed into compound P 2 at m/z 287 (C 16 H 14 O 5 ) by cleaving the lactone ring by the removal of CO 2 .Subsequently, P 2 product was further converted into compound P 3 with m/z 249 (C 14 H 16 O 4 ) by deleting the furan rings of AFB 1 .These LC-MS data demonstrated the susceptibility of the AFB 1 lactone ring and furan rings against E. faecium HB2-2.Some prior research claimed the lactone ring structure in AFB 1 is easily hydrolyzed, Eshelli et al. disclosed the breakdown of the terminal lactone ring of AFB 1 to create a carboxylic acid product with a m/z value of 331, and the product with a m/z value of 287 after decarboxylic reaction [54].Wang et al. reported an AFB 1 -degrading bacteria Escherichia coli CG1061 isolated from chicken cecum, the products of AFB 1 were examined by UPLC Q-TOF MS and the m/z ion peaks at 287 was identified as the probable degradation product [55].A similar process, in accordance with our results, was observed in other studies showing the biological degradation of AFB 1 by microorganism [19,[56][57][58].

Cytotoxicity Assay of the AFB1 Degradation Products
In this investigation, the toxicity of AFB1 and its degradation products reduced by E. faecium HB2-2 was tested by cell viability of HepG2 and RAW264.7 cells.AFB1 residues present in NB media untreated with strain HB2-2, as well as the degraded products of AFB1 in fermentation supernatant treated with E. faecium HB2-2, were isolated utilizing immunoaffinity columns.Subsequently, they were cultured with HepG2 and RAW264.7 cells for 24, 48, and 72 h.As shown in Figure 10, AFB1 isolated from NB demonstrated cytotoxicity rates of 25.8%, 39.5%, and 45.8% against HepG2 cells after 24, 48, and 72 h of treatment, respectively.Degradation products of AFB1 treated with E. faecium HB2-2 demonstrated only 6.2%, 13.4%, and 23.5% cytotoxicity on HepG2 cells at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively.The same trend was found with RAW264.7 cells, untreated AFB1 displayed cytotoxicity rates of 42.5%, 59.4% and 76.9% against RAW264.7 cells at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively.In contrast, the cell inhibition rates of degraded products of AFB1 treated with E. faecium HB2-2 were only 8.0%, 15.6% and 29.8% at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively.The cellular morphology was further observed, and the cell shape in the AFB1-treated group was changed significantly compared with the degraded products group (Figure 11).These results indicated higher cellular toxicity of AFB1 extracted from untreated group compared to the degradation products of AFB1 treated with E. faecium HB2-2.Which suggested that the AFB1 was degraded by HB2-2, and the toxicity of products was lowered compared to the parent AFB1.These findings were associated with the LC-MS results revealing the efficiency of HB2-2 towards the toxicogenic difuran and lactone rings in AFB1.These findings were corroborated by Kumar et al., who demonstrated that the cytotoxicity of AFB1-degraded products by Bacillus albus YUN5 was significantly reduced

Cytotoxicity Assay of the AFB1 Degradation Products
In this investigation, the toxicity of AFB1 and its degradation products reduced by E. faecium HB2-2 was tested by cell viability of HepG2 and RAW264.7 cells.AFB1 residues present in NB media untreated with strain HB2-2, as well as the degraded products of AFB1 in fermentation supernatant treated with E. faecium HB2-2, were isolated utilizing immunoaffinity columns.Subsequently, they were cultured with HepG2 and RAW264.7 cells for 24, 48, and 72 h.As shown in Figure 10, AFB1 isolated from NB demonstrated cytotoxicity rates of 25.8%, 39.5%, and 45.8% against HepG2 cells after 24, 48, and 72 h of treatment, respectively.Degradation products of AFB1 treated with E. faecium HB2-2 demonstrated only 6.2%, 13.4%, and 23.5% cytotoxicity on HepG2 cells at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively.The same trend was found with RAW264.7 cells, untreated AFB1 displayed cytotoxicity rates of 42.5%, 59.4% and 76.9% against RAW264.7 cells at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively.In contrast, the cell inhibition rates of degraded products of AFB1 treated with E. faecium HB2-2 were only 8.0%, 15.6% and 29.8% at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively.The cellular morphology was further observed, and the cell shape in the AFB1-treated group was changed significantly compared with the degraded products group (Figure 11).These results indicated higher cellular toxicity of AFB1 extracted from untreated group compared to the degradation products of AFB1 treated with E. faecium HB2-2.Which suggested that the AFB1 was degraded by HB2-2, and the toxicity of products was lowered compared to the parent AFB1.These findings were associated with the LC-MS results revealing the efficiency of HB2-2 towards the toxicogenic difuran and lactone rings in AFB1.These findings were corroborated by Kumar et al., who demonstrated that the cytotoxicity of AFB1-degraded products by Bacillus albus YUN5 was significantly reduced

Cytotoxicity Assay of the AFB 1 Degradation Products
In this investigation, the toxicity of AFB 1 and its degradation products reduced by E. faecium HB2-2 was tested by cell viability of HepG2 and RAW264.7 cells.AFB 1 residues present in NB media untreated with strain HB2-2, as well as the degraded products of AFB 1 in fermentation supernatant treated with E. faecium HB2-2, were isolated utilizing immunoaffinity columns.Subsequently, they were cultured with HepG2 and RAW264.7 cells for 24, 48, and 72 h.As shown in Figure 10, AFB 1 isolated from NB demonstrated cytotoxicity rates of 25.8%, 39.5%, and 45.8% against HepG2 cells after 24, 48, and 72 h of treatment, respectively.Degradation products of AFB 1 treated with E. faecium HB2-2 demonstrated only 6.2%, 13.4%, and 23.5% cytotoxicity on HepG2 cells at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively.The same trend was found with RAW264.7 cells, untreated AFB 1 displayed cytotoxicity rates of 42.5%, 59.4% and 76.9% against RAW264.7 cells at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively.In contrast, the cell inhibition rates of degraded products of AFB 1 treated with E. faecium HB2-2 were only 8.0%, 15.6% and 29.8% at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively.The cellular morphology was further observed, and the cell shape in the AFB 1 -treated group was changed significantly compared with the degraded products group (Figure 11).These results indicated higher cellular toxicity of AFB 1 extracted from untreated group compared to the degradation products of AFB 1 treated with E. faecium HB2-2.Which suggested that the AFB 1 was degraded by HB2-2, and the toxicity of products was lowered compared to the parent AFB 1 .These findings were associated with the LC-MS results revealing the efficiency of HB2-2 towards the toxicogenic difuran and lactone rings in AFB 1 .These findings were corroborated by Kumar et al., who demonstrated that the cytotoxicity of AFB 1 -degraded products by Bacillus albus YUN5 was significantly reduced compared to the untreated AFB 1 sample [44].Some additional microorganisms have shown the identical effect to degrade AFB 1 to some small molecules with minimal cytotoxicity, such as Bacillus velezensis [52], Streptococcus thermophilus [19], and Fusarium sp.WCQ3361 [27].

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Degradation rate of AFB1 by isolated strains.Values in the bar graph represent the mean values ± SD of three independent experiments.Different lower-case letters in the same items indicate a significant result as determined by Duncan's range test (p < 0.05).

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Degradation rate of AFB 1 by isolated strains.Values in the bar graph represent the mean values ± SD of three independent experiments.Different lower-case letters in the same items indicate a significant result as determined by Duncan's range test (p < 0.05).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Identification of strain HB2-2 from morphologies.(A) Colony characteristics of the strain (B) the cell morphology of Gram staining; (C, D) the bacterial fine structure observed by SEM.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.The phylogenetic tree constructed based on 16S rRNA gene.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Identification of strain HB2-2 from morphologies.(A) Colony characteristics of the strain; (B) the cell morphology of Gram staining; (C,D) the bacterial fine structure observed by SEM.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Identification of strain HB2-2 from morphologies.(A) Colony characteristics of the strain; (B) the cell morphology of Gram staining; (C, D) the bacterial fine structure observed by SEM.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.The phylogenetic tree constructed based on 16S rRNA gene.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.The phylogenetic tree constructed based on 16S rRNA gene.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The degradation activity of AFB1 in peanut meal by E. faecium HB2-2.The peanut m contaminated with AFB1 (105.1 µg/kg) was mixed with fermentation liquid at different material liquid ratios (peanut meal/fermentation liquid, 1:1, 1:5, 1:10, 1:15, 1:20 and 1:30).Values in the graph represent the mean values ± SD of three independent experiments.Different lower-case lett in the same items indicate a significant result as determined by Duncan's range test (p < 0.05).

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.The AFB1 degradation activity of different cellular fractions of E. faecium HB2-2.The fermentation supernatant, cell suspensions and intracellular extracts were mixed with AFB1, respectively.E. faecium HB2-2 incubated with AFB1 served as a control.All groups were incubated at 32 °C for 96 h.Values in the bar graph represent the mean values ± SD of three independent experiments.Different small letters in the same items indicate a significant result as determined by Duncan's range test (p < 0.05).

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.The AFB 1 degradation activity of different cellular fractions of E. faecium HB2-2.The fermentation supernatant, cell suspensions and intracellular extracts were mixed with AFB 1 , respectively.E. faecium HB2-2 incubated with AFB 1 served as a control.All groups were incubated at 32 • C for 96 h.Values in the bar graph represent the mean values ± SD of three independent experiments.Different small letters in the same items indicate a significant result as determined by Duncan's range test (p < 0.05).

Figure 7 .
Figure 7.The AFB1 degradation activity of fermentation supernatant treated with heat inactivation, proteinase K and proteinase K+SDS.Values in the bar graph represent the mean values ± SD of three independent experiments.Different lower-case letters in the same items indicate a significant result as determined by Duncan's range test (p < 0.05).

Figure 7 .
Figure 7.The AFB 1 degradation activity of fermentation supernatant treated with heat inactivation, proteinase K and proteinase K+SDS.Values in the bar graph represent the mean values ± SD of three independent experiments.Different lower-case letters in the same items indicate a significant result as determined by Duncan's range test (p < 0.05).

3. 7 .
Identification of the AFB 1 Degradation ProductsLC-MS analysis is often used to examine the degradation products of AFB 1 .As indicated in Figure8A, the ion peaks at m/z 313 [M+H] + and 335 [M+Na] + related to AFB 1 were discovered in the mass spectrum of the control group (NB media with AFB 1 ), these distinctive peaks were also founded in the mass spectrum of AFB 1 treated with E. faecium HB2-2 (Figure8B), and are attributable to residual AFB 1 .These characteristic peaks results were in agreement with shu et al. who discovered particular ion peaks of AFB 1 with m/z 313, 335, and 647 in the complete mass spectrum of AFB 1 degradation products degraded by Bacillus velezensis DY3108 [52].Wang et al. observed the specific ion peaks of AFB 1 at m/z 313 [M+H] + and m/z 335 [M+Na] + in the fermentative mixture by fast biodegradation of AFB 1 by metabolites of Fusarium sp.WCQ3361 [27].Additionally, LC-MS analysis indicated multiple ion peaks at distinct m/z values related to complicated degradation products of AFB 1 in the mass spectrum of the E. faecium HB2-2-treated group.The primary ion peaks of products at m/z 331 (P 1 , C 17 H 15 O 7 ), 287 (P 2 , C 16 H 15 O 5 ), 249 (P 3 , C 14 H 17 O 4 ) in Figure

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Analysis and identification of AFB1 and its degraded products.(A) The mass spectra of AFB1 in the control group untreated with E. faecium HB2-2; (B-D) the mass spectra of AFB1-degraded products by E. faecium HB2-2.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9.The hypothetical degradation pathway of AFB1 based on LC-MS analysis of the degraded products.

Figure 8 . 20 Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Analysis and identification of AFB 1 and its degraded products.(A) The mass spectra of AFB 1 in the control group untreated with E. faecium HB2-2; (B-D) the mass spectra of AFB 1 -degraded products by E. faecium HB2-2.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9.The hypothetical degradation pathway of AFB1 based on LC-MS analysis of the degraded products.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9.The hypothetical degradation pathway of AFB 1 based on LC-MS analysis of the degraded products.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Cytotoxicity assay of the degraded products.The toxicity of the AFB1 and its degraded products were determined by examining the cell inhibition rates of (A) HepG2 and (B) RAW264.7 cells at different times.Values in the bar graph represent the mean values ± SD of three independent experiments.Different lower-case letters in the same items indicate a significant result as determined by Duncan's range test (p < 0.05).

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.The effects of AFB1-degraded products on cell morphology.(A1) The morphology of HepG2 cells in control group (without AFB1 and its degraded products); (A2) the morphology of HepG2 cells treated with degraded products; (A3) the morphology of HepG2 cells treated with AFB1; (B1) the morphology of RAW264.7 cells in control group (without AFB1 and its degraded products); (B2) the morphology of RAW264.7 cells treated with degraded products; (B3) the morphology of RAW264.7 cells treated with AFB1.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Cytotoxicity assay of the degraded products.The toxicity of the AFB 1 and its degraded products were determined by examining the cell inhibition rates of (A) HepG2 and (B) RAW264.7 cells at different times.Values in the bar graph represent the mean values ± SD of three independent experiments.Different lower-case letters in the same items indicate a significant result as determined by Duncan's range test (p < 0.05).

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Cytotoxicity assay of the degraded products.The toxicity of the AFB1 and its degraded products were determined by examining the cell inhibition rates of (A) HepG2 and (B) RAW264.7 cells at different times.Values in the bar graph represent the mean values ± SD of three independent experiments.Different lower-case letters in the same items indicate a significant result as determined by Duncan's range test (p < 0.05).

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.The effects of AFB1-degraded products on cell morphology.(A1) The morphology of HepG2 cells in control group (without AFB1 and its degraded products); (A2) the morphology of HepG2 cells treated with degraded products; (A3) the morphology of HepG2 cells treated with AFB1; (B1) the morphology of RAW264.7 cells in control group (without AFB1 and its degraded products); (B2) the morphology of RAW264.7 cells treated with degraded products; (B3) the morphology of RAW264.7 cells treated with AFB1.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.The effects of AFB 1 -degraded products on cell morphology.(A1) The morphology of HepG2 cells in control group (without AFB 1 and its degraded products); (A2) the morphology of HepG2 cells treated with degraded products; (A3) the morphology of HepG2 cells treated with AFB 1 ; (B1) the morphology of RAW264.7 cells in control group (without AFB 1 and its degraded products); (B2) the morphology of RAW264.7 cells treated with degraded products; (B3) the morphology of RAW264.7 cells treated with AFB 1 .

Table 1 .
The physiological and biochemical characteristics of strain HB2-2.

Table 1 .
The physiological and biochemical characteristics of strain HB2-2.

Table 1 .
The physiological and biochemical characteristics of strain HB2-2.