Fatty Acid Composition of Selected Street Foods Commonly Available in Malaysia

Despite growing evidence of increased saturated and trans fat contents in street foods, little is known about their fatty acid (FA) compositions. This study aimed to analyse the saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), and trans fatty acids (TFAs) content of 70 selected and most commonly available street foods in Malaysia. The street foods were categorised into main meals, snacks, and desserts. TFAs were not detected in any of the street foods. Descriptively, all three categories mainly contained SFAs, followed by MUFAs, and PUFAs. However, the one-way ANOVA testing showed that the differences between each category were insignificant (p > 0.05), and each FA was not significantly different (p > 0.05) from one to another. Nearly half of the deep-fried street foods contained medium to high SFAs content (1.7 g/100 g–24.3 g/100 g), while the MUFAs were also high (32.0–44.4%). The Chi-square test of association showed that the type of preparation methods (low or high fat) used was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with the number of SFAs. These findings provide valuable information about fat composition in local street foods for the Malaysian Food Composition Database and highlight the urgency to improve nutritional composition.

. List of abbreviations and acronyms used in the paper.

Abbreviation Definition
LMICs Low-and middle-income countries SFAs Saturated fatty acids MUFAs Monounsaturated fatty acid PUFAs Polyunsaturated fatty acids

Materials and Methods
In this cross-sectional study, data collection was conducted in two phases: (1) a survey of street foods and (2) sampling and analysis of FA composition in selected street foods. In Phase 1 of the study, a survey was conducted in all states to identify the top 15 most frequently available street foods for each food category in every state. In Phase 2 of the study, food sampling of 70 street foods (5 foods × 14 states) was carried out to analyse the FA composition. However, among the 70 analysed street foods, 14 similar foods were sampled from more than one state, and 25 different foods were sampled from only one state. In order to achieve the aim of this study, the FA contents of the 14 similar foods were presented as average values from the respective states. Thus, this study presented the FA composition for 39 street foods.
This study is an extension of previous research undertaken to determine the most frequently available street food in all states of Malaysia while assessing the sodium levels [18]. Furthermore, the current study applied an additional sampling criterion for FAs composition analysis in Phase 2. This study was carried out from October 2021-May 2022. The methods of conducting this study have been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the National University of Malaysia with reference number UKMPPI/111/8/JEP-2020-433.

Phase 1: Survey of Street Food in All States of Malaysia
Phase 1 involved a field survey of locally available street foods in 13 states and one Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia. The definition of street food was adopted from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) [31]: "Ready-to-eat foods consumed without further processing or preparation, and sold by roadside hawkers such as trolleys, bicycles, markets, trucks or stalls that do not have fixed building or four walls". Therefore, the eligible street food vending sites included in the survey were food establishments selling ready-to-eat food and not contained within a fixed building or four walls, i.e., mobile and stationary vending sites, individual stalls, and stalls at the morning and night markets. The surveyed markets were identified through the city council websites of each state. The study had a total of 380 locations surveyed across 68 districts in Malaysia.
A survey form was used to record information such as the name of street food, state, district, category of street food (e.g., main meal, snack, or dessert), and preparation method of the street food. The criteria for main meals, snacks, and desserts in this study are based on the description by the International Scientific Committee [32] as follows: 1.
Snack: savoury food eaten between the main mealtimes, i.e., morning tea and afternoon tea; 3.
Dessert: sweet food eaten at the end of a main meal or as part of the main meal. A total of 10,520 street foods were surveyed, in which 40% (n = 4234) of the street foods were snacks, while 37% (n = 3887) and 23% (n = 2399) were the main meals and dessert categories, respectively. The top 15 most frequently available street foods for each category in all states were subsequently identified and recorded. The selection of food for sampling in each state was conducted based on the top 15 most frequently available street foods for each category previously identified in Phase 1 (in which several types of street foods varied between states) as well as the following criteria: (1) use of high-fat preparation method, (2) use of high-fat ingredients, and (3) availability of the street food during the sampling (food sampling was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic; hence the operating hours of stalls were hugely affected). Based on the selection, five street foods (regardless of the food categories) from every state were selected for food sampling, according to a method used by Tee et al. [33]. Thus, 70 street food samples from 14 states (including the same type of food from a different state) were analysed for the FA composition. While sampling each selected food, samples were purchased from two stalls within the respective states. This also applied to foods that were sampled from only one state. For instance, kerepek (only found in one state) was analysed based on two kerepek purchases from stall 1 and stall 2 within the respective state. The purchased food samples were transported in an ice box and stored in the freezer at −20 • C to delay food spoilage before further analysis.

Preparation of Street Food Samples for FA Composition Analysis
The preparation of street food samples was conducted in the food analysis laboratory. Each purchased food sample was weighed with the packaging using a top pan balance (Mettler Toledo, OH, USA, Dragon 3002). Then, the food was removed from the packaging, weighed, and placed on a plate or bowl. The inedible portions of the food samples, such as bones, were removed, and the sample was reweighed. The second sample of the same food purchased from a different location was also prepared using the same method. The two samples were then homogenised in a food processor, scooped into an airtight container, and subsequently stored in the freezer at −20 • C for further analysis. Prior to the FA composition analysis, the determination of fat content using the homogenised samples was first carried out through the Soxhlet method [34]. The extraction, esterification, and analysis of FAs conducted in duplicates of the homogenised samples were performed within the same day.

Chemicals and Solvents
Methanol (99.9%), chloroform, potassium chloride (0.88%), and sodium sulphate were used during the extraction of FAs. Meanwhile, toluene, 2% sulphuric acid in methanol, sodium chloride (5%), heptane, and sodium bicarbonate (2%) were used during the esterification of FAs. The Reference Standard 37 Component FAME Mix (Supelco, St. Louis, MO, USA, 47885-U, 10 mg/mL) was used to analyse FAs using the Gas chromatography flame ionization detection (GC-FID) method. All reagents and standards were prepared with deionised water, except for the 2% sulphuric acid in methanol (2 mL in 100 mL methanol).

Extraction of FAs
Approximately 1.5 g (±0.1 g) of the homogenised sample was placed into a glass bottle. Next, 10 mL of methanol and 20 mL of chloroform were added to the glass bottle. The glass bottle was then vortexed and left to sediment for a few minutes. The solvent extracts were then filtered into a Schott bottle by leaving a small portion of the sample in the glass bottle to retain any food debris. The extraction process was repeated an additional two times. After the extraction, 20 mL of 0.88% potassium chloride was added to the Schott bottle. The bottle was then shaken to allow the separation into two layers, and the upper layer was discarded. Similarly, 10 mL of 0.88% potassium chloride and 10 mL methanol mixture (ratio 1:1) were added into the same Schott bottle and shaken to allow separation, and the upper layer was discarded. The solvent extract was filtered through sodium sulphate and poured into a new glass bottle to remove moisture. The extracts were then concentrated under nitrogen gas below 60 • C.

Esterification of FAs
The extract containing the FAs underwent an esterification process to form fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs). During this procedure, the sample dried with nitrogen gas was mixed with 1 mL of toluene and 2 mL of 2% sulphuric acid in methanol in the same glass bottle. The glass bottle was incubated overnight at 50-55 • C. After incubation, the following steps were conducted and repeated twice: (1) 5 mL of 5% sodium chloride in water was added to the glass bottle, and (2) 5 mL of heptane was added, shaken slightly, and left for a few minutes. The upper layer (heptane) was then transferred into a new glass bottle and combined with the subsequent upper layers (heptane) from the repeated process. Then, 4 mL of 2% sodium bicarbonate in water was added to the extract. The sample mixture was shaken and left to separate. The upper layer was filtered through sodium sulphate and placed in a new glass bottle. The 1 mL of the filtered n-heptane layer was pipetted from the glass bottle directly into the vials. Then, a 10× dilution using n-heptane was performed by mixing 100 µL of the sample and 900 µL of n-heptane in a 2 mL vial.

Detection and Quantitation of FAs by GC-FID
Blanks for each batch of samples were run through the entire procedure to measure any contributions to residue from reagents. GC-FID analysis was carried out using a gas chromatograph (Agilent 6890, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a ZB-FAME GC Column (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.2 µm) and a flame ionisation detector (FID). The chromatographic conditions were as follows: initial column temperature 100 • C; injection temperature 250 • C; detector temperature 280 • C; and run time 64 min. The flow rate of the carrier gas (nitrogen) was set at 20 mL/min.
In this method, 1 µL of the methyl esters (extract) solution was injected with the reference standard mixture into the GC-FID. The reference standard mixture was analysed under the same operating conditions as those employed for the sample, and the retention times were measured, along with the eluted methyl ester from the reference standard mixture were identified. The limit of detection (LOD) for all FAs was 0.01 mg/100 g.
The quantification and identification of FAs present in the food sample were conducted using the peak area normalization method. Graphs showing the logarithm of the retention distance of each peak were constructed. All peaks in the sample chromatogram (including those that were not within the 37 FAME retention time) were integrated. The entire sample component was assumed to be represented on the chromatogram. Hence, the total area under the peaks represents 100% of the constituents. As for the result, only 37 components were reported based on the reference standards.
The analytical results of SFAs, MUFAs, PUFAs, and TFAs in each sample were expressed as a percentage (%) based on total fats in the respective samples, similar to the MyFCD. For the purpose of classifying the street food samples based on the low, medium, or high content of SFAs, the amount of SFAs was also expressed as g/100 g of food. The percentage of SFAs based on total FAs was converted into grams of SFAs based on 100 g of food using the following calculation:

Classification of SFAs Content
There is no standardised classification for high SFAs, MUFAs, PUFAs, and TFAs in ready-to-eat dishes like street foods in Malaysia. However, the United Kingdom's Traffic Light Labelling Scheme [35] has a classification for labelling low (≤1.5 g/100 g food), medium (>1.5 g to ≤5 g/100 g food), and high (>5 g/100 g food) SFAs in foods. Thus, this study adopted this classification for the SFAs content of street foods.

Classification of Preparation Method
Based on the latest Malaysian Dietary Guidelines (MDG) [36], the preparation methods identified in the survey were further classified as either healthier (e.g., pan-frying, steaming, stir-frying, grilling, stewing, and baking) or less healthy (e.g., deep-frying), to identify whether the preparation methods affected the SFAs content of street foods.

Statistical Analysis
A descriptive test was used to determine the total frequency of every street food surveyed for each state, the frequency of the street foods based on food categories, the preparation methods, and the type of street foods. Following the analysis of FA composition, a descriptive test was also used to determine the average and standard deviation of each FA for the selected street foods. Inferential test such as the one-way ANOVA was used to compare the average SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs between food categories. If the food categories had unequal sample sizes and both one-way ANOVA and homogeneity of variance were significant, a Games-Howell posthoc test was performed to identify the specific differences between the three food categories. The one-way ANOVA was also used to compare each FAs within each food category. The Chi-square test of association was used to determine the association between the SFAs content (g/100 g food) and the preparation method used for each street food. All the descriptive and statistical tests were conducted using IBM (Armonk, NY, USA) Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. The significance level for all conducted statistical analyses was set at p < 0.05.

Results
A total of 70 street foods (32 snacks, 26 main meals, and 12 desserts) were analysed for their FA composition, as displayed in Table S1. This paper presents the SFAs, MUFAs, PUFAs, and TFAs contents of similar street foods from different states as average values. Since 25 street foods were obtained from only one state, and 14 similar street foods were obtained from more than one state, this study reported the average SFAs, MUFAs, PUFAs, and TFAs contents in 39 selected street foods (16 snacks, 14 main meals, and 9 desserts) that are frequently available in Malaysia. The description of each street food is shown in Table S2.
None of the analysed street foods contained any amount of TFAs. Figure 1 shows the average content of SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs based on the food category (16 snacks, 14 main meals, and 9 desserts, respectively). The dessert category had the highest SFAs content (52.8 ± 18.2%), followed by the main meals (48.4 ± 11.2%) and snacks (43.1 ± 5.1%). MU-FAs content was the highest in snacks (36.6 ± 7.2%), followed by main meals (36.0 ± 8.1%), and desserts (29.7 ± 12.0%). PUFAs content was the highest in snacks (20.0 ± 8.3%), followed by desserts (17.6 ± 12.4%) and main meals (15.6 ± 5.9%). The FAs content between the food categories was not significantly different (p > 0.05) from one to another. Within each food category, all three food categories were composed mainly of SFAs, followed by MUFAs, and the least was in PUFAs, although the findings were not significantly different (p > 0.05).
8.1%), and desserts (29.7 ± 12.0%). PUFAs content was the highest in snacks (20.0 ± 8.3%), followed by desserts (17.6 ± 12.4%) and main meals (15.6 ± 5.9%). The FAs content between the food categories was not significantly different (p > 0.05) from one to another. Within each food category, all three food categories were composed mainly of SFAs, followed by MUFAs, and the least was in PUFAs, although the findings were not significantly different (p > 0.05).  Table 2 shows the preparation method and the average FA composition of the 39 street foods arranged according to the classification of high, medium, and low SFAs content per 100 g of food. In general, the SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs content of street foods ranged from 29.3-88.5%, 7.0-44.4%, and 4.5-38.8%, respectively. Table 2. Preparation method and fatty acid (FA) composition of 39 street foods according to high (>5 g/100 g food), medium (>1.5 g to ≤5 g/100 g food), and low (≤1.5 g/100 g food) SFAs 1 content classification [35].   Table 2 shows the preparation method and the average FA composition of the 39 street foods arranged according to the classification of high, medium, and low SFAs content per 100 g of food. In general, the SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs content of street foods ranged from 29.3-88.5%, 7.0-44.4%, and 4.5-38.8%, respectively. Table 2. Preparation method and fatty acid (FA) composition of 39 street foods according to high (>5 g/100 g food), medium (>1.5 g to ≤5 g/100 g food), and low (≤1.5 g/100 g food) SFAs 1 content classification [35].  Based on the classification of SFAs content in 100 g of food sample, cakoi (24.3 ± 3.6 g/100 g) contained the highest SFAs content, while chicken rice (1.2 ± 0.3 g/100 g) had the lowest SFAs content.
Surprisingly, only 7 street foods had the highest amount of PUFAs (30.0-38.8%), mainly found in snacks (57.1%), desserts (28.6%), and main meals (14.3%). Approximately 42.9% were pan-fried, 28.6% were grilled (28.6%), and 14.3% were deep-fried and baked, respectively. The remaining 32 street foods contained PUFAs ranging from 4.5% to 24.6%. Apam balik was reported to contain the highest amount of PUFAs, while kuih jelurut had the least amount of PUFAs. The PUFAs content for all 39 street foods, from highest to lowest amount, is shown in Table S4. Figure 2 displays the percentage distribution of all 70 street foods based on the classifications of the preparation methods and SFAs content. Most (48.6%) of the street foods that were prepared using healthier preparation methods, such as steaming, baking, stewing, grilling, pan-frying, and stir-frying, contained low to medium SFAs content. This was followed by street foods that used a less healthy preparation method (i.e., deep-frying) and contained high (31.4%) and low to medium (12.9%) SFAs content, respectively. Lastly, only 7.1% of street foods that were prepared in a healthier manner reported a high SFAs content of more than 5 g/100 g of food. An association test (shown in Table 3) reported that the SFAs content in the 70 street foods was significant (p < 0.001) and strongly associated (Φ = 0.59) with the classification of the preparation methods used. This means that foods prepared using a healthier method were more likely to contain low to medium SFAs contents than foods prepared less healthily. only 7.1% of street foods that were prepared in a healthier manner reported a high SFAs content of more than 5 g/100 g of food. An association test (shown in Table 3) reported that the SFAs content in the 70 street foods was significant (p < 0.001) and strongly associated (Φ = 0.59) with the classification of the preparation methods used. This means that foods prepared using a healthier method were more likely to contain low to medium SFAs contents than foods prepared less healthily.  Table 3. Association between preparation methods and SFAs 1 content of street foods (n = 70).

Category of Preparation
Method (n = 70)

Percentage of street foods (%)
Low to medium (5 g and less) High (more than 5 g) Figure 2. Percentage of street foods (n = 70) based on the classification of preparation methods and SFAs content in 100 g of food. Table 3. Association between preparation methods and SFAs 1 content of street foods (n = 70).

Discussion
This study found that the gas chromatography did not detect TFAs in any of the local street foods, which is not in agreement with the findings from other countries in the Asian [5,6,8,12], European [7,9,37], and African [10] regions. This is possibly due to varying ingredients used in the local street foods in other countries. For instance, street foods in other Asian countries, such as India [12], are mainly fried in or used vanaspati, a vegetable ghee rich in TFAs [38] that is not commonly used in Malaysian street food. Despite the fact that a large proportion of street foods in the current study are also deepfried, it is possible that palm oil was used by the local vendors, as it is a common cooking or frying oil in Malaysia [39]. According to the Malaysian Palm Oil Council [40], palm oil is popularly used in the local food scene as it is naturally stable against oxidation when used for high-temperature cooking methods, such as deep-frying, due to the high composition of SFAs in the oil. Moreover, the semi-solid form enables palm oil to be used without the need to be further solidified through the process of hydrogenation, making palm oil free from TFAs [41]. Besides vanaspati, other sources of TFAs, such as partially hydrogenated margarine and shortenings, are commonly used in street foods, such as roti canai, curry puff, chicken burgers, and donuts [36]. However, the findings in this study may suggest that the use of partially hydrogenated ingredients among vendors in Malaysia is low and that they might use tub-style margarine products which do not contain TFAs [42]. Notably, the substitution of stick margarine with tub margarine was found to be associated with a lower risk of CVD [43]. Other than the type of fat-based ingredients used in the local street foods, the absence of TFAs may also be explained by the cooking temperature used to prepare the foods. Most of the studied street foods are deep-fried using a cooking temperature below 200 • C [44]. A recent review [14] found that heating edible oils to below 200 • C, a common cooking temperature, does not affect the TFAs levels in the oil. Yi Chen et al. [17] also found that there was only a small increase in TFAs levels in foods deep-fried below 200 • C using palm oil.
In this study, desserts contained the most SFAs, whereas snacks had the most MUFAs and PUFAs. These findings were in line with street food studies in Kazakhstan [5] and Moldova [7], in which SFAs content was significantly the highest in street foods that are sweet, such as chocolates, cakes, and wafers. Albuquerque et al. [7] also reported that PUFAs were highest in savoury street foods, such as pateuri (a fried pastry). In this study, all street foods under the dessert category were sweet; meanwhile, all street foods under the snack category were of the savoury type. Despite SFAs being the highest in desserts and MUFAs and PUFAs being the highest in snacks, SFAs were the most dominant FA present in all three food categories. This finding supports the evidence from a study [45] reporting that local Asian foods are, indeed, high in saturated fats and more saturated than westernised-styled foods. Although there is an ongoing debate on the link between saturated fats and CVD risk [46][47][48], with growing evidence [49] of contrasting associations between different dietary sources of SFAs and the risk of CVD (rather than the amount of SFAs), it is still imperative for Malaysians to control their consumption of local street foods, as more than half (64.4%) of the population consumes at least one out-of-home meal daily [50], as well as to be conscious of the sources of SFAs consumed. Nevertheless, the FA profile of each food category presented a similar proportion of SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs. This was also previously observed in a study conducted among local street foods in Mozambique [10]. As street foods are relatively less expensive than regular brick-andmortar food establishments [3,51,52], this may indicate that local street foods could be a good source of MUFAs and PUFAs, especially among the consumers in developing countries [53,54].
The SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs content between the street foods varied considerably, indicating possible differences in the preparation methods or ingredients used [55]. Cakoi ranked first among the 39 street foods in terms of SFAs content and is classified as a high-SFA food. Cakoi is a long, golden-brown deep-fried strip of dough that originated in China but is now a popular snack in Malaysia. On the contrary, chicken rice contains the least SFAs and is classified as a low-SFA food. This is most likely due to the difference in preparation methods, as cakoi is deep-fried, whereas steaming and roasting methods are mainly used to prepare the rice and chicken in the chicken rice. Cakoi, in the present study, is deep-fried in palm oil, which explains the high SFAs content, considering that palm oil has approximately 50% SFAs [56][57][58]. On the other hand, the SFAs content of the chicken in chicken rice may have been reduced after undergoing the roasting process. Alina et al. [59] found that the roasting method slightly reduces the SFAs content in chicken meat. Chicken rice, in this study, had marginally higher SFAs (43.6%) than the current reports in MyFCD (39.5%). Additionally, nearly half of the street foods with medium to high SFAs content that were deep-fried (such as cakoi, kerepek, french fries, chicken nuggets, and donuts) may also be linked to the use of palm oil. Thus, street food vendors should be encouraged to strain the excess oil off the fried food, and consumers should be reminded to control their consumption of deep-fried street foods, which is also in accordance with the MDG 2020 [36].
It is important to note that street foods not prepared by deep-frying also contain medium to high SFAs, possibly due to the usage of vegetable-and animal-based fats. In terms of ingredients, the main meals, such as net crepes (roti jala), glutinous rice with rendang, noodles with gravy, nasi lemak, and nasi lemak with fried chicken and desserts, such as kuih seri muka and kuih jelurut, are all coconut milk-based dishes. Traditionally, coconut milk is used extensively in Malaysian main dishes and desserts (except for kuih jelurut) [60], such as in the curry gravy served with net crepes (roti jala), the rendang and glutinous rice, and the pandan custard layer of kuih seri muka [61]. The rice in nasi lemak is also cooked with coconut milk [62]. Kuih jelurut, a local steamed delicacy among the Brunei ethnicities [63] in Sabah, incorporates coconut milk as the main ingredient [64]. As the SFAs in coconut milk are present in high proportions (92.0%) [36], this may corroborate the current findings. Vendors could opt for substituting coconut milk with fresh milk in coconut milk-based desserts and main meals. Marina and NurulAzizah [65] found that custard pudding and green curry prepared using fresh milk had significantly lower fat content than those prepared using coconut milk and fresh coconut milk. Besides vegetablebased fat, such as coconut milk, animal-based fats, such as butter, processed meats, animal fats, and cheese, are used in these street foods. Popcorn was the second street food with the highest SFAs content. This may be because the popcorn samples were coated with a caramel butter sauce, and the latter is one of the primary sources of saturated fats in the diet [66]. Chicken patties, fried sausage, chicken nuggets, and pizza also contain processed meats high in saturated fats. In addition, the meat in satay, also known as meat skewers, is often skewered with meat fats to add more flavour. As expected, street foods with added cheese, such as fried chicken, banana fritters, and apam balik with cheese, had more SFAs than the regular versions.
The majority (82.1%) of the street foods in this study contained high MUFAs content. The MUFAs content is likely from the use of palm oil used to deep-fry most of the foods and other MUFA-rich ingredients. Although palm oil contains a high percentage of SFAs, it is also rich in MUFAs, with a nearly equal amount of SFAs [67,68]. Hence, this might have accounted for the high SFAs content in deep-fried snacks, such as cakoi, kerepek, french fries, chicken nuggets, fried popiah, curry puff, fried chicken, fried chicken with cheese, keropok lekor, fried sausage and fried fish ball, and deep-fried desserts, such as donuts, kuih keria, banana fritters with cheese, and banana fritters. Besides palm oil, nuts and seeds are also good sources of MUFAs, contributing almost 50% to the FA profile [39,67,68]. The MUFAs content in main meals, such as roti canai, might be due to the lentils gravy or dhal, as these two are commonly served together. In contrast, nasi lemak and apam balik might be good sources of MUFAs due to the use of peanuts that predominantly contain MUFAs [69]. Likewise, the kerepek or deep-fried chips in this study also contained peanuts, which contribute additional MUFAs to this deep-fried snack. Chicken burgers also contain high MUFAs content, which may be linked to the chicken patty used. Laskowski et al. [70] reported that meat products, including processed poultry products, contribute as much as 18% of MUFAs to the average Polish diet. Interestingly, noodle-based and rice-based main meals, such as fried kuey teow, fried noodles, noodles with gravy, fried rice, and chicken rice, were also among the high-MUFA-containing foods. The low MUFA (7%) content in kuih jelurut was possibly due to the lack of MUFA-rich ingredients used in this sweet dessert, as the main ingredients [71] (p. 148) needed are rice flour, gula apong, and coconut milk. The rich source of MUFAs reported in fried vermicelli should be made known to the consumers, as this main meal is one of the most commonly consumed ready-to-eat dishes among adults in Malaysia [72].
Apam balik and apam balik with cheese were the two street foods with the most amount of PUFAs. In a normal set of apam balik, this sweet pancake-like dessert is filled with nuts, sugar, and corn. The PUFAs content may be due to the use of PUFA-rich ingredients such as nuts. Therefore, apam balik could be considered a good source of PUFAs and may be beneficial to health, as frequent consumption of nuts has been demonstrated to have an association with lowering the risk of developing diet-related chronic diseases such as CVD [73,74]. However, the intake should also be controlled due to the sugar content.
This study showed that deep-fried street foods tended to contain higher SFAs content than foods prepared using healthier methods, such as steaming, baking, stewing, grilling, pan-frying, and stir-frying. Deep-frying is the process of immersing food in hot oil between 130 • C and 190 • C [44]. Several studies compared the SFAs content of foods from different cooking methods. Choo et al. [75] found that deep-frying significantly increased the SFAs in a Japanese threadfin beam fillet (a type of fish) in comparison to grilling, baking, and steaming methods. Asmaa and Tajul [76] found that the SFAs content in chicken sausage significantly increased after deep-frying, whereas steaming in an oven did not affect the SFAs content in chicken sausage. These might explain the association between the deepfrying method and the SFAs content of street foods in this study. Given that Malaysia is one of the main producers of palm oil [77], and the high smoke point makes it suitable for deep-frying purposes, it is also worth noting that palm oil may account for the SFAs content in the studied deep-fried street foods. Notwithstanding little evidence that has managed to link the intake of saturated fats with health risks, deep-frying is a popular cooking method due to its fast preparation and ability to produce sensorily acceptable foods [78]. It is also the most preferred cooking method chosen by Malaysians [79]. In light of this, street food vendors in Malaysia should be advised to use as little oil as possible when preparing food. As suggested by the MDG 2020 [36], vendors could opt for using cooking methods that use less fat, such as grilling, pan-frying, and stir-frying instead of deep-frying, and they should also remove the excess oil after cooking. Besides that, they should also be aware not to reuse cooking oil more than twice to avoid imposing unwanted health effects on the consumers, as local food operators still have moderate awareness regarding the practice of reusing oil [39]. Given the limited amount of data currently available in the MyFCD on the FA composition in local, ready-to-eat dishes, the findings from this study could be used to update the database. Since the MyFCD is publicly available, the updated data could assist consumers in selecting street foods that are low in saturated fats and high in unsaturated fats.

Conclusions
This study demonstrated that SFAs content predominated in all three categories of street foods-main meals, snacks, and desserts, followed by MUFAs and PUFAs. Desserts contained the most SFAs, whereas snacks contained the most MUFAs and PUFAs. The majority of street foods that contained medium to high SFAs were deep-fried dishes, coconut milk-based dishes, and those that contained butter, processed meats, animal fats, or cheese. Meanwhile, street foods with low amounts of SFAs were prepared by steaming and stir-frying. Street foods that contained nuts had the highest content of MUFAs and PUFAs. Similarly, deep-fried street foods were also high in MUFAs. The local street foods contained no TFAs, possibly due to the limited use of partially hydrogenated fats such as ghee. The street foods that were prepared by deep-frying mostly contained high SFAs content, whereas, among the street foods that were prepared using healthier methods, most contained low SFAs content. Apart from updating the MyFCD database, these findings may encourage consumers to limit their consumption of coconut milk-based foods, deepfried foods, and processed foods, as well as recognise several local street foods that may potentially increase their intake of unsaturated fats. Improving the nutritional composition of local street foods is imperative to creating a healthier food environment and reducing the development of diet-related chronic diseases. Educating street food vendors could be one of the ways to achieve this. Given that no amount of TFAs was detected in any of the street foods, especially those that are deep-fried, future studies could focus on the factors that may influence the TFAs content in foods, such as the frying temperature, duration of frying, usage of TFA-rich ingredients, and the practice of reusing oils.