Is There a Convergence between the Food Classification Adopted by Food-Based Dietary Guidelines and Food Science and Technology?

The World Health Organization (WHO) proposed the dietary guidelines presented as the Food-based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG). The FBDG classify foods according to their origin, nature, nutrient source, food group, and processing level. Food science and technology (FST) ranks food according to its origin, perishability, nutrient source, processing, food group, and formulation. This paper aimed to compare the convergence points for food classification according to the FBDG and FST. This study was carried out in two phases. The first step was identifying the Food-Based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG). For each of the FBDG, food items were grouped as fruits, vegetables, cereals, sugars, fat and oils, legumes, foods from animals, dairy products, and others. The second step aimed to identify and describe the different food classification systems. The search was performed on PubMed®, Science Direct, and Web of Science and websites of international organizations such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Codex Alimentarius. Our results show that the points of convergence between the classifications were the classification in terms of origin (animal and vegetable), nutrient sources, and food groups. However, inconsistencies were observed for the distribution of food items in each group in the 98 surveyed FBDG. As for nature, there was a convergence for in natura, minimally processed, and processed foods. However, the criteria adopted for minimally processed and processed foods described in the FBDG differ from those considered by the FST. FST also does not recognize the classification of foods concerning the level of processing.


Introduction
Food consumption has been recognized as an essential predictor of health or behavior that strongly influences health and future disease risk.Food composition and classification data are used in health studies, from which results are the basis for formulating public policies [1][2][3][4][5][6].However, in epidemiological studies, comparing food and nutrient consumption in different countries indicates difficulties in finding a solid foundation for classifying food [7][8][9][10][11][12].
Such divergences are probably observed because two fields of scientific knowledge, although closely related, assign different criteria to classify foods: the first referring to food production and the second related to food and its effects on health.Many sciences, such as physics, chemistry, mathematics, and biology, bypassed the scientific development of food science and technology [13,14].At the beginning of the 19th century, dietary standards emerged to regulate the production and marketing of food products and ensure consumers' health and legal commercial practices.In this scenario, in 1954, the Codex Alimentarius Europaeus was established, comprising all European countries.In 1961, Data on the chemical composition of foods must express reliable information about the nutritional composition of foods [8,26].
In this regard, in 1998, the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed dietary guidelines as Food-based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG).FBDG aim to guide the population regarding food consumption and recommend that meal planning is based on foods that provide a healthy and balanced diet.They incorporate the consumption characteristics of each country and their eating habits, providing recommendations for which foods to eat or not [2,34,[40][41][42].
The FBDG classify food items according to their origin, food groups, nature/processing, and nutrient sources and food science and technology (FST) classifies foods according to the degree of perishability, origin, nutrient source, nature, processing, and formulation [8,10,12,[43][44][45][46][47].Considering that the FDBG are essential tools for promoting healthy eating, that a critical number of studies on food consumption are carried out and have as standard the classification of foods described in such documents, there is a gap in the literature on research comparing the food classification proposed in the FBDG and by FST, this paper aimed to compare the convergences between the two types of food classification.

Methodology
This study was carried out in two phases (Figure 1).The first step was identifying the Food-Based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG) on the FAO website [43] from 10 August 2022 to 10 March 2023.For each of the FBDG, food items were grouped as fruits, vegetables, cereals, sugars, fat and oils, legumes, foods from animals, dairy products, and others.To organize FBDG data, a database was created using "Microsoft Excel" (2016) software (Office Windows package).Data were organized into three software files using "Microsoft Excel" (2016).The countries' languages were registered in the first file and the first worksheet.In the second worksheet, the names of all the food classifications of all the FBDG were included.Based on the obtained classifications, the food groups were separated by spreadsheets.The presence or absence of a particular food in a certain group was organized in a second file in the software "Microsoft Excel" (2016).For example, green banana was included in the cereal or fruit group.The third file presented all the classifications for each food group: all the nomenclatures that only refer to cereals or carbohydrate sources in a spreadsheet, all nomenclatures that only refer to meat or protein sources in another spreadsheet, and so on.Finally, all the food groups on the FAO website were systematized.The data for each worksheet were calculated using the "count" or "sum" feature and the percentage value of the groups or foods.

Food Classification According to the Food Science and Technology (FST)
Processed foods have been part of our diet since ancient times.From making bread in 25,000 BC, foods such as dried fruits, olive oil, cheeses, preserves, chocolate, bacon, salted and cured meats, and sugar were obtained through artisanal techniques [48][49][50][51][52][53].Studies performed between the 17th and 19th centuries led to the identification of chemical and biological events such as combustion; the naming of elements (oxygen, hydrogen, The second step aimed to identify and describe this study's different food classification systems.The search was performed on PubMed ® , Science Direct, and Web of Science and websites of international organizations such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Codex Alimentarius.The following combinations of descriptors were used to search: "food classification" and "food classification systems."The search was performed on 10 August and 11 August 2022, without limitation on the date or origin of the studies.To locate possible studies not found in the initial search, the authors performed a reverse search using the reference lists of the selected articles.Inclusion criteria were original and review articles on (1) food classification systems, (2) food guides, (3) food processing, (4) food industry, (5) industrialized food, and (6) processed food.Exclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials, experimental studies, case studies, and studies that brought an association between a particular food group and/or dietary guidelines and diseases.A total of 66 articles and international documents (specific legislation) were included (Figure 1).

Food Classification According to the Food Science and Technology (FST)
Processed foods have been part of our diet since ancient times.From making bread in 25,000 BC, foods such as dried fruits, olive oil, cheeses, preserves, chocolate, bacon, salted and cured meats, and sugar were obtained through artisanal techniques [48][49][50][51][52][53].Studies performed between the 17th and 19th centuries led to the identification of chemical and biological events such as combustion; the naming of elements (oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen); the performance of the first chemical analyses; the identification of food components such as proteins; the confirmation of Pasteur on the action of microorganisms in alcoholic beverages; the pasteurization process; the production of the first preserves, consolidating technologies as a science (Figure 2).Scientists such as Lavoisier, Gay-Lussac, and Berzelius contributed to modern food chemistry, initially stimulated by the knowledge of food composition [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57].
The evolution of food science from the 17th century provided the opportunity to evolve from artisanal techniques to contemporary technologies.The need to achieve and maintain food safety and the interest in extending seasonal foods' shelf life led to food-processing developments.Incorporating scientific principles formed the basis of the processes currently used to manufacture food products and ingredients.We have evolved towards optimizing technologies, standardization of products, increasing the offer, and reducing the occurrence of physical, chemical, and biological risks in food [48][49][50][51][52][53]58].Additionally, in the last three centuries, in addition to improving analytical techniques, science has shown that several factors influence the variability in nutrient content (varieties, species, climatic conditions, type of production, place of production, and processes) [38,49,59].
Any process, or even any continuous sequence of operations, is defined as a step, among many, that leads to the transformation of fresh food.Each step refers to an essential operation that results in physical and chemical changes in the food.Processing may also include adding other ingredients such as salt, sugar, food additives, and other substances approved in formulations.Therefore, processing can reduce, increase, or maintain unaltered properties of in natura foods or even minimally processed foods [36,58,61,[67][68][69].It is essential to understand that there is a difference between processed and industrialized food, despite the terms being mistakenly used as synonyms.Industrialized food can also be classified as processed food.Industrialized foods are processed using equipment appropriate to the production volume in their facilities.However, the opposite is only sometimes true, as food processing can also be carried out in homes and various food services, such as cafeterias, restaurants, schools, hospitals, or even farms, among many others [36,69,70].Artisanal food production, for commercial purposes (or not), whether on a small or large scale, is also an industrial activity, as the food is processed to be offered to a population and not for their consumption (Figure 3) [69,70].The classification criteria supported by FST are based on similar characteristics among different foods, such as origin, nutrient source, perishability, nature, processing, and formulation (Table 1) [26, 45,59,60,70,71].As for origin, foods are classified as species of plant and animal origin.Foods are dietary sources of proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, vitamins, and minerals.For the Codex Alimentarius, vegetables are plants cultivated in the field and garden crops in the open and under glass.They comprise all plant species consumed as food obtained directly from the soil, without any transformation other than cleaning, maintaining all the biological qualities they had when they were still in the plants [59].Vegetables are grouped according to botanic characteristics as follows: leafy or stem vegetables and flowers (e.g., cabbage, lettuce, and arugula); fruit-bearing vegetables (e.g., melons, tomatoes, and peppers); root, bulb, and tuberous vegetables (e.g., onion, potatoes, and sweet potatoes); leguminous vegetables (e.g., green peas); other vegetables (e.g., green maize and mushrooms).Fruit is the organ that comes from the flower, formed by the maturation of one or more ovaries after fertilization.They are generally classified as simple, aggregated, and multiple (or compound) fruits.
Vegetable classification can also be based on climate adaptation (hot climate and cold climate); the life cycle (annual, biannual, perennial); origin (exotic and autochthonous); the way the product is presented to the consumer (in natura, canned, dehydrated, frozen, minimally processed, and processed); based on the edible parts (roots, tubers, rhizomes, leaves, fruits, tender stalks and buds, inflorescences/flowers, bulbs, immature seeds, and cultivated mushrooms).The botanical characteristic is the most appropriate for naming The classification criteria supported by FST are based on similar characteristics among different foods, such as origin, nutrient source, perishability, nature, processing, and formulation (Table 1) [26, 45,59,60,70,71].As for origin, foods are classified as species of plant and animal origin.Foods are dietary sources of proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, vitamins, and minerals.For the Codex Alimentarius, vegetables are plants cultivated in the field and garden crops in the open and under glass.They comprise all plant species consumed as food obtained directly from the soil, without any transformation other than cleaning, maintaining all the biological qualities they had when they were still in the plants [59].Vegetables are grouped according to botanic characteristics as follows: leafy or stem vegetables and flowers (e.g., cabbage, lettuce, and arugula); fruit-bearing vegetables (e.g., melons, tomatoes, and peppers); root, bulb, and tuberous vegetables (e.g., onion, potatoes, and sweet potatoes); leguminous vegetables (e.g., green peas); other vegetables (e.g., green maize and mushrooms).Fruit is the organ that comes from the flower, formed by the maturation of one or more ovaries after fertilization.They are generally classified as simple, aggregated, and multiple (or compound) fruits.
Vegetable classification can also be based on climate adaptation (hot climate and cold climate); the life cycle (annual, biannual, perennial); origin (exotic and autochthonous); the way the product is presented to the consumer (in natura, canned, dehydrated, frozen, minimally processed, and processed); based on the edible parts (roots, tubers, rhizomes, leaves, fruits, tender stalks and buds, inflorescences/flowers, bulbs, immature seeds, and cultivated mushrooms).The botanical characteristic is the most appropriate for naming these food items in their groups because they are stable.For this purpose, three taxonomic units are used: the botanical family (grouping of related botanical genera), the botanical genus (group of related species), and the botanical species (basic taxonomic unit), bringing together very similar plant characteristics [72][73][74][75][76][77].

Formulation
Simple and mixed foods [45] Cereals are vegetables that, botanically, belong to the grass family.Their seeds are harvested when dried and comprise species such as rice, wheat, corn, barley, triticale, rye, millet, sorghum, and oats [77,80].Cereal-based products are obtained from edible parts that can be subjected to maceration, milling, extraction, heat treatment, and/or other technological processes considered safe for food production, such as bran, starchy products, bread flour, pastry, pasta, and beverages (beer), among others [80].Legumes (pulses) are protein-containing and mainly consumed when dried, but for some species, legumes can also be consumed in the immature phase.Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), broad bean (Vicia faba), lentil (Lens culinaris), chickpea (Cicer arietinum), dry pea (Pisum sativum), and vigna (Vigna sp.) are considered "pulses", and they are distinguished from leguminous oil seeds by their low-fat content [77,[81][82][83].
Oilseed consists of seeds from various plants that produce edible vegetable oils, seed meals, and cakes for animal feed.Some important vegetable oil seeds are by-products of fiber or fruit crops (e.g., cottonseed and olives).Some of the oilseeds are, directly or after slight processing (e.g., roasting), used as food (e.g., peanuts) or for food flavoring (e.g., poppy seed and sesame seed) [17,59].
According to Codex Alimentarius, meat is the matured muscle mass and the other tissues accompanying it, including the corresponding bone mass, offal, blood, fat, cartilage, and bones.Its classification is related to the species from which it precedes: beef, pork, lamb; poultry (chicken, turkey, and duck); fish (fish, lobster, shrimp, and oysters); hunting (non-domestic animals); reptiles; batrachians (e.g., frogs and others); chelonians (e.g., turtles and others); insects [59,84].In turn, the eggs of some species of animals (birds or reptiles) are fertilized, or not.The designation of egg means chicken eggs; the others come with an indication of the species.In contrast, seafood means fish, crustaceans, mollusks, amphibians, reptiles, echinoderms, and other aquatic animals used in human food [85][86][87].Milk without other specifications is derived from complete and uninterrupted milking under hygienic conditions from healthy, well-fed, and rested cows.Dairy products are obtained through the technological processing of milk and may contain ingredients, additives, and technical aids only when functionally necessary for processing [86,88].
Foods of animal and vegetable origin can be classified as perishable or semi-perishable since the water activity content in the food matrix affects the speed of deterioration, mainly of microbial origin.They can be classified as in natura, minimally processed, and processed according to their nature.Fresh food refers to food in its natural state [36].Minimally processed food is any product, usually vegetables, e.g., roots and tubers, leaves, fruits and flowers, pods and seeds, sprouts, and fruits, or any combination thereof, that has been physically altered from its original form and remains fresh.In turn, processed food is the raw material (food item) of animal or vegetable origin, which has been subjected to processes that can occur at room temperature, by the application of heat, by removal of heat, by irradiation, electric fields, high hydrostatic pressure, and light or ultrasound.It is also possible to use food additives or add nutrients or bioactive substances [36,60,70,89,90].
In this context, foods are classified as pasteurized, dehydrated, evaporated, extruded, refrigerated, frozen, lyophilized, irradiated, fermented, and enriched, among others [45,61,70,91,92].However, the chemical composition and, consequently, the nutritional value of such foods will also depend on preliminary operations such as peeling, size reduction, mixing, shaping, separation, the concentration of components, etc.; therefore, we infer that the nutritional value, for example, of brown rice (richer in fiber) and processed rice (richer in starch) differs from the nutritional value of the grain in natura [45,91].In the same way, it is necessary to pay attention to the formulation of the products.Formulation is the term used in the food industry to describe the amount of ingredients and food additives calculated from the amount of raw material, which corresponds to 100%.The formulation makes it possible to predict which technologies (processes) are necessary to guarantee the quality of the products in terms of chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, nutritional, and legal aspects [36,93].
Thus, the International Network of Food Data Systems (INFOODS) proposes the classification of foods based on their composition as simple foods and compound foods.Simple foods are those that have the following criteria: (a) foods in their natural state, only inedible or rejected parts are removed (fruit pulp, fruits, and vegetables in natura); (b) foods from which part of the edible portion has been removed during processing (skimmed milk, white wheat flour); (c) foods with a single main ingredient, dehydrated or with added water (dried fruits, cooked rice, teas, fruit juices, concentrated or diluted, fruit nectars); (d) foods with a single main ingredient, added with other ingredients in amounts that do not significantly impact the energy value; (e) foods that have been processed with or without the removal of parts of the edible portion, with or without the addition of small amounts of other ingredients, such as fortified corn flakes.Compound foods consist of raw materials with ingredients from different sources, such as cakes, bread, and ready-to-eat products, among others [10,28,45,94]

Food Classification according to the Food-Based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG)
Contrary to the expectations around adopting FBDG by different countries that make up the United Nations, of the 193 countries, only 51% (n = 98) have FBDG to guide the consumption of necessary foods for health promotion.The regions with the highest number of FBDG are the European continent (n = 34), the American continent-Latin America and Caribbean (n = 29), and the Asian continent-Asia and Pacific (n = 17).Although Africa has 54 countries, only 10 have FBDG; Oceania has 6 countries with FBDG (Table 2).
The most usual systematization in the FBDG is food groups (n = 94; 96%).Although 94 FBDG use classification according to food groups, we identified that some countries adopt combinations of food groups with nature and/or nutrient sources and/or origin, such as the FBDG of Peru, Israel, and Belgium, among others.Alternatives such as nutrient sources (carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, vitamins, and minerals) (n = 13, 13%) or according to their nature/processing (in natura, minimally processed, and processed) (n = 10, 10%), origin (vegetable and animal) (n = 17, 17.5%) and culture of the country are the minority (n = 2, 2%).In seven FBDG (from Yugoslavia, Slovenia, Croatia, Iceland, Ecuador, Peru, and Brazil), foods are classified as highly processed foods (n = 1); highly processed foods, rich in sugar and fat (n = 1); processed foods (n = 5); processed foods high in fat, sugar, and salt (n = 1); in natura or minimally processed (n = 3); ultra-processed foods (n = 4).Of these countries, Brazil, Ecuador, and Peru use the NOVA classification (in natura or minimally processed foods; oils, fats, salt, and sugar; processed foods and ultra-processed foods) [12,35,95].Brazil and Ecuador are the only ones that adopt the classification according to nature/processing, while Peru also adopts the classification of food groups.Sweden and Fiji classify food based on healthy parameters.
Two hundred thirty-five terms were cited to name the food items in the respective groups described in the 98 FBDG (Figure 4).The most-used terms to identify foods in the 98 FBDG were: fruits (n = 57; 58%), vegetables (n = 52; 53%), oils and fats (n = 27; 27.5%), vegetables and fruits (n = 24; 24.5%), and foods from animals (n = 13; 13%).Two hundred thirty-five terms were cited to name the food items in the respective groups described in the 98 FBDG (Figure 4).The most-used terms to identify foods in the 98 FBDG were: fruits (n = 57; 58%), vegetables (n = 52; 53%), oils and fats (n = 27; 27.5%), vegetables and fruits (n = 24; 24.5%), and foods from animals (n = 13; 13%).It is important to mention that the "dairy products" group is separated from the "Food from animals" group because, although the name food from animals is the most used for foods of animal origin, not all food groups of animal origin include dairy products (there are 30 terms related to the specific nomenclature "milk or dairy products").Therefore, this separation was maintained in this manuscript.It is important to mention that the "dairy products" group is separated from the "Food from animals" group because, although the name food from animals is the most used for foods of animal origin, not all food groups of animal origin include dairy products (there are 30 terms related to the specific nomenclature "milk or dairy products").Therefore, this separation was maintained in this manuscript.
It is plausible to consider that for the construction of these groups, the inclusion of items with common properties and easily identifiable by the consumer was considered.However, our study identified that the items listed by the group have widely differing internal and external characteristics.They differ regarding the relevant data set to the grouping, such as shape, colors, consumption and preparation characteristics (process), chemical composition, and nutritional value.Only their origin, e.g., plant origin, is the common criterion.

Food from Animals
Likewise, we identified that some of the terms used to name the food items belonging to the legumes group in the analyzed 98 FBDG are related to foods belonging to other groups, such as nuts (fruit), soya (oilseed), and meat (food from animals).Of the 235 identified terms, 27% of these (n = 64) were foods from animals or protein sources, such as meat, poultry, pork, game meat, offal, fish, seafood, meat products (sausage, bologna, salami, bacon or ham), insects, eggs, tofu, milk, yogurt, cheese, beans, soy, pulses, peanuts, seeds, and oilseeds/nuts (Figure 4; Appendix B, Table A2; Appendix C, Table A3).We also identified that 45 (46%) FBDG included beans in the animal group or protein source food group.Thirty-two (n = 32; 33%) included peanuts, and thirty-nine (40%) had soy in this group; 90% of the FBDGs incorporated eggs (n = 89; 90%) and fish (n = 89; 90%) into the group food from animals and only twenty FBDG (20%) included the seafood in that group.
From a nutritional point of view, foods from animals are a source of proteins of high biological value as they provide all the essential amino acids.In addition, they are sources of complex B vitamins and lipids [83,96,97,[100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107].Proteins are macronutrients and a central part of the human diet, chemically consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen.Dietary proteins are found mainly in animal-derived food (milk and dairy products, meat, poultry, fish, and eggs), vegetables, and legumes.They occur in different proportions with varying amino acid profiles [83,97,102,103].Proteins act in the constitution of any cell, are part of the composition of the body's immune system antibodies, and actively participate in numerous metabolic processes and other body functions.Gluconeogenic amino acids are converted into glucose to provide energy [35,84,100,[108][109][110].
Considering the lipid content, the literature reports the influence of the animal species, the type of handling, the diet, the cut type, the recipe, and the adopted preparation technique, among other factors [85,111].

Fats and Sugar
Regarding the terms used to name the food items in the fat group, twenty-nine (29.6% of the 98 FBDG) terms were associated with oils and fats, e.g., butter, margarine, oils obtained from seeds, avocado, coconut, and olive oil.Fifteen FBDG (15.3%) included avocados in this group, while coconut was included in this group in ten (10.2%) of the FBDG (Appendix C).
Twenty-two terms were used for food items in the sugar group.However, words like "highly processed foods rich in sugar and fat; oil; butter; fat; rice" are inconsistent with the proposed grouping (Appendix C).
In the FBDG from Brazil, Ecuador, and Uruguay, foods were classified according to the NOVA (classification of foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing), which ranks foods as in natura/minimally processed (Group 1); in Group 2-oils, fats, salt, and sugar (processed culinary ingredients), Group 3-processed foods, and Group 4-ultra-processed foods (Figure 5) [3,12,24,35,95,[112][113][114][115].This classification only makes it possible to compare epidemiological studies that used this same grouping, not reflecting the chemical composition and nutritional value of a given food item/product.Regarding the terms used to name the food items in the fat group, twenty-nine (29.6% of the 98 FBDG) terms were associated with oils and fats, e.g., butter, margarine, oils obtained from seeds, avocado, coconut, and olive oil.Fifteen FBDG (15.3%) included avocados in this group, while coconut was included in this group in ten (10.2%) of the FBDG (Appendix C).
Twenty-two terms were used for food items in the sugar group.However, words like "highly processed foods rich in sugar and fat; oil; butter; fat; rice" are inconsistent with the proposed grouping (Appendix C).
In the FBDG from Brazil, Ecuador, and Uruguay, foods were classified according to the NOVA (classification of foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing), which ranks foods as in natura/minimally processed (Group 1); in Group 2-oils, fats, salt, and sugar (processed culinary ingredients), Group 3-processed foods, and Group 4ultra-processed foods (Figure 5) [3,12,24,35,95,[112][113][114][115].This classification only makes it possible to compare epidemiological studies that used this same grouping, not reflecting the chemical composition and nutritional value of a given food item/product.

Points of Convergence between the Classification of Foods according to Food-Based Dietary Guidelines and the Food Science and Technology
The present study investigated convergence points between the classification of foods adopted by the researched Food-based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG) and the criteria adopted by food science and technology (FST).Our data show points of convergence In natura or minimally processed food (vegetables, fruits, potatoes, cassava, white, brown or parboiled rice, beans of all colors, lentils, pasteurized, ultra-pasteurized ('long life') or powdered milk, yogurt (without added sugar).
Oils, fats, salt and sugar (Soya, corn, sunflower or olive oils, butter, lard, coconut fat, white, demerara or brown table sugar, fine or coarse table salt).

Processed foods
(Carrots, cucumbers, peas, hearts of palm, onions, cauliflower preserved in brine or in a salt and vinegar solution; tomato extract or concentrates (with salt and or sugar); fruit in syrup and candied fruit; dry meat and bacon; canned sardines and tuna; cheeses; and breads made from wheat flour, yeast, water and salt).

Ultra-processed foods
(Various types of biscuits, ice cream, candies and sweets in general, sugary cereals, cakes and cake mixes, cereal bars, soups, noodles and 'instant' seasonings, sauces, "packaged" snacks, soft drinks and soft drinks, yogurts and sweetened and flavored dairy drinks, frozen and ready-to-heat products, breaded chicken or fish extracts, sausages, bread, hamburger or hot dog buns, and others whose ingredients include substances such as hydrogenated vegetable fat, sugar, starch, whey milk, emulsifiers).

Points of Convergence between the Classification of Foods according to Food-Based Dietary Guidelines and the Food Science and Technology
The present study investigated convergence points between the classification of foods adopted by the researched Food-based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG) and the criteria adopted by food science and technology (FST).Our data show points of convergence when using criteria related to origin, nutrient sources, nature/processing, and food group (Figure 6).Our study identified inconsistencies in the classification recommended by the FDBG re-garding FST due to the mistaken grouping of some food items in the groups, as sources of nutrients, as minimally processed foods, and in terms of origin, animal or vegetable.
when using criteria related to origin, nutrient sources, nature/processing, and food group (Figure 6).Our study identified inconsistencies in the classification recommended by the FDBG regarding FST due to the mistaken grouping of some food items in the groups, as sources of nutrients, as minimally processed foods, and in terms of origin, animal or vegetable.
The current trend is for FBDG to be based on the dietary pattern of the target group, not nutrients [43].Based on studies of associations between the consumption of certain nutrients and the onset of diseases, approximately thirteen (n = 13; 13%) FBDG used terms associated with the classification according to nutrient sources.The types of classification most adopted by the FBDG are those related to food groups and nutrient sources.However, most FBDG (94%) are classified according to food groups, a criterion also used by FST, rather than nutrient sources (Figure 6).A recent study with 2333 Brazilians from all Federative Units found that 54% (n = 1259) of these consumers believe it is easier to classify foods into food groups [12].Even so, there is a variety of combinations between the food items included in these groups that must be rigorously analyzed.
Regarding fruit and vegetable classification, approximately 49% of FBDG group fruits with vegetables.Fruits and vegetables, when correctly consumed in terms of frequency and quantity and combined with other foods, promote health benefits.Therefore, it is important to consider the analysis of the formulation, with the final nutritional composition of a product that uses fruits and vegetables as raw materials, as well as the addition of sugar, fat, and salt to these preparations [36,116,117].In nutritional terms, fruits and vegetables differ in chemical composition and, consequently, in nutritional properties [116,117].Aside from that, 22% of FBDG included fruit juice in the fruits and vegetable group.Most FBDG also have recommended restrictions concerning fruit juice intake, prioritizing the consumption of fresh fruit.Daily fruit juice consumption can increase the development of type 2 diabetes by up to 21% in predisposed individuals [118].Fruit juice offers reduced fiber, increasing the speed of sugar absorption in the gastrointestinal tract and generating insulin spikes that can harm the body, for example [118][119][120].
Beans and other legumes are foods that are classified differently according to the different FBDG.They are included in the fruit and vegetable group, the cereals group, or even included in the food from animals group and with oilseeds.As we have already highlighted, these foods differ in chemical composition and nutritional properties.The current trend is for FBDG to be based on the dietary pattern of the target group, not nutrients [43].Based on studies of associations between the consumption of certain nutrients and the onset of diseases, approximately thirteen (n = 13; 13%) FBDG used terms associated with the classification according to nutrient sources.
The types of classification most adopted by the FBDG are those related to food groups and nutrient sources.However, most FBDG (94%) are classified according to food groups, a criterion also used by FST, rather than nutrient sources (Figure 6).A recent study with 2333 Brazilians from all Federative Units found that 54% (n = 1259) of these consumers believe it is easier to classify foods into food groups [12].Even so, there is a variety of combinations between the food items included in these groups that must be rigorously analyzed.
Regarding fruit and vegetable classification, approximately 49% of FBDG group fruits with vegetables.Fruits and vegetables, when correctly consumed in terms of frequency and quantity and combined with other foods, promote health benefits.Therefore, it is important to consider the analysis of the formulation, with the final nutritional composition of a product that uses fruits and vegetables as raw materials, as well as the addition of sugar, fat, and salt to these preparations [36,116,117].In nutritional terms, fruits and vegetables differ in chemical composition and, consequently, in nutritional properties [116,117].Aside from that, 22% of FBDG included fruit juice in the fruits and vegetable group.Most FBDG also have recommended restrictions concerning fruit juice intake, prioritizing the consumption of fresh fruit.Daily fruit juice consumption can increase the development of type 2 diabetes by up to 21% in predisposed individuals [118].Fruit juice offers reduced fiber, increasing the speed of sugar absorption in the gastrointestinal tract and generating insulin spikes that can harm the body, for example [118][119][120].
Beans and other legumes are foods that are classified differently according to the different FBDG.They are included in the fruit and vegetable group, the cereals group, or even included in the food from animals group and with oilseeds.As we have already highlighted, these foods differ in chemical composition and nutritional properties.Legumes are known to be grains contained in pods; as they are grains, in 13% of the 98 FBDG, they are classified as cereals.However, legumes differ from cereals [77,83,97,117,[121][122][123][124].For this reason, 46% of FBDG probably included beans and/or pulses in the food from animals and dairy products group.It should be noted that the content and bioavailability of legume proteins differ from animal products (meat, milk, eggs, and derivatives) with proteins of higher biological value [83,97,103,110,124,125].In the same way, some FBDGs have included soy milk or tofu in the animal food and dairy products group.They are plantbased products consumed by vegans, lactose intolerants, and those allergic to milk proteins, which should not be compared to foods of animal origin in terms of nutritional quality.Studies have shown that plant-based milk (rice, soy, and quinoa) may have the same protein content as bovine milk.However, the protein profile is significantly different, as well as the lower content and bioavailability of minerals (calcium) and anti-nutritional compounds, such as tannins.It does not validate the presence of this food in the group of foods of animal origin and dairy products [83,97,99,101,126].It is noteworthy that it is not correct grouping legumes, a plant-based food, in the food from animal group based on protein content.
Twenty-three (23.5%)FBDG adopted a specific legume group, justified by their nutritional properties and anti-nutritional factors.These modify their recommendation compared to other foods, such as cereals, meats, and oilseeds [117,122,124].Except for methionine, legumes have all the amino acids, including lysine, which is a limiting amino acid for cereals.For this reason, it is recommended to combine the consumption of legumes and cereals in the same meal in an adequate proportion to increase their nutritional value [121].
Approximaely 40% of FBDG incorrectly included pulses, soy, and peanuts in the food from animals group.Both soy and peanuts are products of plant origin and do not have high biological value proteins.In addition, peanuts are legumes with a high fat content [103,123,124].Approximately 11% of FBDG included oilseeds and seeds in the cereals and pulses group.Legumes have a lipid fraction predominance of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids [121].The oilseeds have a higher fat content consisting mainly of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as linoleic acid.They also have an essential content of vitamins B6 and E and minerals (selenium, magnesium, and potassium) and lower carbohydrates, proteins, and fiber content than legumes.Given this composition, it is not recommended to group oilseeds and seeds into the cereals and legumes group [104,121,123,124,127].
FBDGs of 17 Latin American countries added green bananas to the cereals and pulses group.In green bananas, 60-80% of the carbohydrates are fiber (resistant starch, celluloses, hemicelluloses, and lignin).Their ingestion is recommended since they behave in the body similarly to fibers and are considered healthy products [128,129].
Eggs, milk, and derivatives are products of animal origin with high nutritional quality recognized as important for human health.Their protein composition provides individuals the essential amino acids to develop and maintain vital activities [99,121,124,126].Ninetyone (91%) FBDG grouped eggs into the food from animals group.However, six (6.2%)FBDG included sausage in the group of foods of animal origin since meat is the main ingredient in sausage.However, due to the large use of unhealthy additives and high amounts of sodium and fat, its consumption is associated with NCD risk [96,106,110].Therefore, consuming meat products such as mortadella, sausage, salami, ham, and bacon is not encouraged and must be consumed cautiously [103,130,131].
The FBDG of Vietnam, Korea, Cambodia, and Kenya included in their dietary guidelines the consumption of insects in the protein-rich foods group, most likely due to the impact of the traditional intake of insects in these countries [103,130,131].
In the oils and fats group, almost 15 (15.3% (n= 15)) and 10 (10.2%) of the FBDG included avocado and coconut in this group, respectively.From the point of view of FST, avocado and coconut are fruits with high-fat content.It is known that oils (soybean, corn, rice, sesame, etc.), generally liquid at room temperature, have higher contents of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids, except for coconut and palm oils.Olive oil is part of this group, but this term is only used to name oils from fruits: palm oil and olive oil.On the other hand, fats of animal origin, solid at room temperature, are the primary sources of saturated fatty acids such as bacon, lard, and dairy fat.Physiologically, they behave differently in the body; therefore, the fat type should be better specified in dietary recommendations [132][133][134].
Likewise, some contradictions were observed among 22 (9.3%) terms for the sugar group in the FBDG.Some authors consider "sugars" all sugars used as ingredients in processed and prepared foods such as bread, cakes, soft drinks, jams, chocolates, and ice cream.Total sugars are mono and disaccharides naturally present in food, such as lactose in milk, sucrose in table sugar, or glucose and fructose in honey.Table sugar is a product obtained from sugar cane or sugar beet.Such substances are used to impart sweetness to food, among other technological properties, including preserving food [61,85,135,136].The term free sugar is used in industrialized foods that do not have sugar addition in their formulations.Added sugar refers to adding sugar to foods during processing or formulation preparation.Products with added sugar or sugars, such as sweeties, sweet snacks, and sweetened drinks, among others, have different levels of these substances in their formulations, making it difficult to safely assess how much of the product is a source of simple carbohydrates (mono-and disaccharides) [61,85,135,136].
Comparing the food groups described in the 98 FBDG, as well as the food items included in the groups, with the classification proposed by the FST, we identified that despite convergences regarding the sort, e.g., animal origin and vegetable origin, there is incompatibility regarding the inclusion of items in the groups (cereals, vegetables, vegetables; products from animal, insects, eggs, dairy products).FST follows the Codex Alimentarius recommendations, while the logic for classifying foods in the FBDG does not harmonize, for example, origin, group, and main source of nutrients, as verified for foods of plant origin and legumes.Despite identifying divergencies concerning food classification, it is essential to mention that FBDGs are designed for another purpose than a food composition table or the classification carried out by FST.However, guiding the population using correct and understandable classification is crucial to avoid misinterpretation.
The NOVA classification system groups foods as in natura or minimally processed, processed, and ultra-processed foods (Figure 3).Although NOVA classification is not considered FBDG or FST classification, NOVA classification is used to classify foods in the Brazilian FBDG.
Considering the classification in terms of nature and food processing proposed by the FBDG and FST, we understand that they considered the same classification: in natura, minimally processed, and processed.However, the concepts proposed by FST differ from those established in the FBDG since minimally processed food, according to FST, is defined as any fresh fruit or vegetable or any combination that has been physically altered from its original form but remains fresh.The critical point of minimally processed fruits and vegetables is their active metabolism and respiratory rate despite physical changes [36,50,62,70,89,90].Regardless of commodity, it has been trimmed, peeled, washed, and cut into 100% usable products.It is subsequently bagged or prepackaged to offer consumers high nutrition, convenience, and value while maintaining freshness.For the NOVA classification, minimally processed foods are in natura foods that have been subjected to cleaning processes, removal of inedible or undesirable parts, fractionation, milling, drying, fermentation, pasteurization, refrigeration, freezing, and similar techniques that do not involve adding salt, sugar, oils, fats, or other substances to the original food, diverging from the concepts described by FST [4,5,12,35,114,137].
Furthermore, in the FBDGs of Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, and Uruguay, the term ultraprocessed is used to classify some foods.According to the NOVA classification, ultraprocessed foods are industrial formulations made entirely or mainly from substances extracted from food (oils, fats, sugar, starch, and proteins), derived from food constituents (hydrogenated fats and modified starch), or synthesized in the laboratory based on organic materials such as petroleum and coal (colorants, flavorings, flavor enhancers, and various types of additives used to endow products with attractive sensory properties) [4,5,12,35,114,137].It is essential to highlight that, in all instances, these terminologies (whether aligned with food standards or not) are aimed at supporting prudent food choices in population members, with some potential that they could be misconstrued due to the divergencies in the terminology.FST does not recognize this type of process/operation as a food classification.
In recent years, the prevalence of NCD has increased, and many researchers have attributed this phenomenon to the consumption of industrialized foods [11,12,67].Regarding processing as a means for classification, today, there is no consensus in the scientific community about the appropriateness of this approach.Some scientists view the NOVA classification as not contributing to new knowledge about food that has not been covered in the traditional way of classifying foods.
Industrialized foods can be added sugars, lipids, sodium, or food additives that can harm health when added improperly or when consumed in excess [12,70].Similarly, processed foods in the household environment can be added to sugars, fats/oils, starches, proteins, natural pigments, seasonings and condiments, and others.Food processing is essential in providing edible, safe, and nutritious foods to the population and in food conservation.However, the topic is complex, with many processes that may bring risks and benefits depending on the context.There are reportedly negativity and misconceptions regarding processed foods in the media and by consumers [58,69,71,138].
Regarding the presentation of information on the classification of foods in the FBDG, some authors have shown that information on whether foods are sources of calcium, fat, or proteins still needs to be fully understood by the population [12,34,98,101,121,139].The authors consider that consumers often need clarification on the information offered by different sources on nutrition and healthy lifestyles and even on the food composition (carbohydrates, fats, proteins, vitamins, and minerals) presented on labels [34].In addition, there is a growing amount of incorrect information regarding food products published by the media, making it difficult to adopt healthy eating practices due to consumers' difficulty differentiating between healthy and unhealthy [140][141][142].The disparity of mistaken information is a factor that contributes to consumer disbelief regarding the safety and reliability of the product [12,30,[143][144][145][146].
Advances in the labeling of industrialized products that identify, in addition to the product's name, the list of ingredients, the nutritional information, and property claims on labels, provide better understanding, often restricted to professionals [11,12,36,145,147,148].The dissemination of adequate messages about nutritional composition is essential to guide dietary practices [148].In this context, messages must be short, clear, objective, easy to remember, understandable, and culturally acceptable to transform eating habits.According to some authors, FBDG should be practical and accessible, with many food options, to cater to different population groups and visual materials [12,34,[40][41][42].
According to Sadler et al. [58], precise definitions (the appropriate description of a food item and its physical, chemical, and nutritional attributes and definition of what it is rather than what it is not) avoid multiple interpretations and enable a common understanding [58].Healthy eating is associated with adequate intake, quantitatively and qualitatively, of nutrients.In addition to respecting cultural and social factors, it must consider combinations of food items and preparations and, consequently, the nutrients.Divergences regarding the indicator used as a reference for epidemiological studies can lead researchers to hasty conclusions and, possibly, inaccurate, given the mistakes considered in their selection [36].
Thus, to reduce information asymmetry between researchers, public policymakers, and consumers, using terms that nutritionally reflect food items for daily consumption is recommended, considering reliable data on their chemical composition that expresses the nutrition composition and sources of nutrients [36].Public policymakers must know what are, at least, foods of animal or plant origins.Each Codex Alimentarius signatory country follows its recommendations, including the nomenclature of foods of animal and plant origin, whether in natura, minimally processed, or processed [2,149].Humans have always used food as a function, predominantly of access to products and empirical knowledge, as well as the fact that the Industrial Revolution has provided significant behavioral changes in the world.Only part of the world population makes choices based on quality parameters, including nutritional quality, despite the demands of health, sustainability, authenticity, and ethics [12,33,38,58,65,69,150,151].
In the modern world, convenience is needed, and the food industry is essential.After approximately 200 years of the food industry's existence and 60 years after food engineering became an established field of science, this has not been enough for some people to trust and feel safe with industrialized food.Furthermore, people lack knowledge about industrialized food, quality, and food safety, so how can they trust in something they do not know sufficiently?Including food subjects in basic education, such as food education, food safety, nourishment, good domestic food handling, and sustainability issues, must be considered in a public policy tool [138].
Despite the various proposals developed in epidemiological studies, Deharveng et al. [152] and Ireland et al. [9] support the need to define analytical methods to assess the chemical composition of food, standardize the "expression" of nutrients, and classify foods based on chemical composition data.In this direction, INFOODS (1997) clarifies the importance of having the chemical composition and, consequently, the nutritional value of in natura, minimally processed, or processed food at home or in the industry to group it in some group or category [153,154].
In addition to classifying foods, it is important to evaluate the chemical and nutritional composition of foods, simple and compound, since recipes, technical preparation files, and formulations are made up of a group of instructions related to the quantity and quality of raw materials and ingredients, to the precise recording of all ingredients, their proportions, and sequence of operations.Systematized recipes, technical preparation files, and formulations reveal foods' chemical and nutritional composition and show trends in the relationship between food and nutrition [12,36].The "formulations" originated from homemade recipes, initially comprised a list of ingredients and, later, began to describe the amount of each ingredient and the "how to do it."With the upcoming food service, these recipes evolved into the technical preparation files, which, in this case, prioritize, in addition to economic aspects, the dish's nutritional value [36,93].Thus, in addition to understanding, it is necessary to discern the impact of the formulation, the food recipe on its chemical properties and its nutritional value, expressed in terms of energy or the content of a specific nutrient [36,155].

Conclusions
Our results showed that the classification of foods indicated in the 98 surveyed Foodbased Dietary Guidelines (FBDG) established convergence with food science and technology (FST) for the criteria source of nutrients and origin of foods, animal or plant.By classifying foods in food groups in the FBDG, we identified that the distribution of some food items in food groups needs to follow the botanical classification (fruits, cereals, vegetables, and oleraceas) recommended by FST for foods of plant origin.A similar approach can be considered for foods of animal origin.Legumes do not have the same nutritional value as animal foods.Presumably, such items were incorporated into the group because they were protein-rich.Using such groupings can lead to erroneous interpretations regarding the chemical and nutritional aspects in the interpretation of food consumption versus nutritional quality.Regarding the nature of foods, whether in natura, minimally processed, or processed, from a scientific and technological point of view, it is impossible to classify foods according to the "level of processing".Unit operations (cleaning, size reduction, mixing, adding ingredients, additives, heating, and packaging) do not define the nutritional value of the food.
A proposal for food classification should include eating habits, availability of products in the region, access issues (food security), technological development, and availability of data on chemical composition.We must consider and improve the consumers' food literacy, informing them that foods, regardless of origin and technical process, are sources of nutrients.Indeed, its chemical composition determines whether a food item is a source of a particular nutrient.The chemical composition of a recipe or formulation will decide if the product is high in calories and is a source of lipids or fibers.The issue goes beyond a list that groups foods and is directly related to the correct information interpretation from the aspect of FST.The result of the recipe adopted at home, in food service, or in industry determines the processed food's content, quality, and nutritional value.The results of this review reinforce an urgent need for shared work between professional nutritionists, food scientists and technologists, public policymakers, and representatives of the food industry to discuss the classification of foods.Just grouping foods into categories does not translate the nutritional value of a food or a product exactly.There is a need to further educate health workers and researchers regarding food classification; thus, they may not contribute to misinformation.Deharveng et al. [152] To compare availability and define analytical methods and mode of expression of nutrients of interest for EPIC.
European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Food composition tables from the following countries: Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, England, Italy, Holland, Spain, and Sweden.To harmonize food classification and food composition databases, allowing comparability of consumption at both food and nutrient levels in Europe.

2011
EFSA [14] To develop a standardized food classification and description system with general applicability and a preliminary technical system specification FoodEx-2.

2011
Monteiro et al. [46] To develop a classification of food purchases made by Brazilian households and explore the potential impact on the overall diet quality.
The group created a new classification of food based on the extent and purpose of food processing.The groups are unprocessed/minimally processed foods (Group 1), processed culinary ingredients (Group 2), and ultra-processed ready-to-eat or ready-to-heat food products (Group 3).

2012
Eicher-Miller et al. [47] To develop food categories by level of processing to determine the contribution of processed food to the total daily intake of dietary nutrients.
Food categories based on various USDA composition tables.The categories are: minimally processed foods processed for preservation, mixtures of combined ingredients, ready-to-eat processed foods, or prepared foods/meals.The "mixtures of combined ingredients" category was separated into two subcategories: "packaged mixes and jarred sauces" and "mixtures probably home prepared."The ready-to-eat processed foods" category was divided into two subcategories: "packaged ready-to-eat foods" and "mixtures possibly stored".

2014
Weaver et al. [92] To analyze the contribution of processed food to the US diet and review emerging technologies and the research needed to understand better the role of processed foods in a healthy diet.
The group used categories of processed foods as proposed by the International Food Information Council.The categories are: foods that require processing or production (also called "minimally processed"); foods processed to help preserve and enhance nutrients and freshness of foods at their peak; foods that combine ingredients such as sweeteners, spices, oils, flavors, colors, and preservatives with improving safety and taste and add visual appeal; "ready-to-eat" foods needing minimal or no preparation; foods packaged to stay fresh and save time.Three main groups are identified: "non-processed foods", consumed raw without any further processing; "modestly/moderately processed foods", sub-divided into industrial and commercial foods that are finished with no additional cooking and foods processed at home and prepared/cooked from raw foods or moderately processed foods; "processed foods, sub-divided into "staple/basic foods" and "highly-processed foods."Foods and products are classified as "minimally processed,"; "foods processed for preservation,"; "mixtures of combined ingredients,"; "ready-to-eat processed foods,"; "prepared foods/meals."Three categories are used to describe food: "industrialized modern foods", "industrialized traditional foods", and "non-industrialized foods", sub-divided into "modern and traditional preparations made from home", "traditional preparations made at home or by artisanal", and "unprocessed foods."To determine 2000-2012 trends in the US households' contribution to processed and convenience food categories, comparing saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content.
Four categories were created based on the degree of industrial food processing: unprocessed and minimally processed; basic processed; moderately processed; highly processed.Three types were also demonstrated based on product convenience.

PAHO/WHO [158]
To show trends in ultra-processed food and drink product sales in 13 Latin American countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela).

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Phases of Food-based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG) analysis and search.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Evolution of food science and technology (white) and Food-based Dietary Guidelines-FBDG (black).Figure 2. Evolution of food science and technology (white) and Food-based Dietary Guidelines-FBDG (black).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Evolution of food science and technology (white) and Food-based Dietary Guidelines-FBDG (black).Figure 2. Evolution of food science and technology (white) and Food-based Dietary Guidelines-FBDG (black).

Foods 2023 , 30 Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Types of operations used in food processing in the household environment, in artisanal production, and in industry.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Types of operations used in food processing in the household environment, in artisanal production, and in industry.

Foods 2023 ,
12,  x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 30 nature/processing, while Peru also adopts the classification of food groups.Sweden and Fiji classify food based on healthy parameters.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Terms used to describe food items in the respective food groups cited in the 98 FBDG.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Terms used to describe food items in the respective food groups cited in the 98 FBDG.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. NOVA: A new classification of foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. NOVA: A new classification of foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Possible points of the convergences between the classification of foods according to the Food-based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG) and food science and technology (FST).

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Possible points of the convergences between the classification of foods according to the Food-based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG) and food science and technology (FST).

2014 Moubarac et al. [ 25 ]
To evaluate food classification systems using a systematic review as follows: in Europe, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) used a methodology devised for the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study;in the United States, the International Food Information Council Foundation (IFIC); in Mexico, the National Institute of Public Health in Mexico distinguishes between industrialized and local food and products and between modern and traditional foods and products.

Table 1 .
Food classification according to food science and technology.
Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent, and the Grenadines, Uruguay, and Venezuela.37n = 29; 78% Europe Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, To discuss the general outcome and conclusions of a European project (EFCOSUM); to develop a European food consumption survey method that delivers internationally comparable data on a set of policy-relevant nutritional indicators.Discussion groups based on prior experiences such as DAFNE, EPIC, FLAIR Eurofoods Enfant project, COST Action 99, etc.