Next Article in Journal
Research Progress in Flocculation Treatment of Aggregate Washing Wastewater: Mechanisms, Innovations, and Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding and Mitigating Corona Quenching in ESPs Under High Fly Ash Concentrations in a 660 MW Coal-Fired Unit
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural and Surface Properties of CeO2 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Lead Ion Removal

by
Bakheit Mustafa
* and
Ard Elshifa M. E. Mohammed
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Qassim University, Buraidah 51452, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Separations 2026, 13(2), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations13020061
Submission received: 4 November 2025 / Revised: 18 December 2025 / Accepted: 19 December 2025 / Published: 9 February 2026

Abstract

In this study, cerium oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles were successfully synthesized using a simple and cost-effective hydroxide-mediated precipitation method. Comprehensive characterization (XRD, SEM, TEM, FTIR, BET, and UV–Vis) confirmed the formation of uniformly distributed nanoparticles with an average size of ~100 nm, a well-defined crystalline structure, and a high specific surface area of 118.96 m2/g. The CeO2 nanoparticles also exhibited a mesoporous framework with a pore volume of 0.39 cm3/g and an average pore radius of 2.27 nm, demonstrating favorable properties for adsorption applications. Adsorption experiments showed that CeO2 nanoparticles effectively removed Pb2+ from aqueous solutions, achieving a maximum experimental adsorption capacity of 192 mg/g and a removal efficiency of 80% at pH 6 under the tested conditions. Kinetic analysis revealed that the pseudo-second-order model best described the adsorption process, suggesting chemisorption as the dominant mechanism, while equilibrium data were more accurately represented by the Langmuir isotherm model, which predicted a theoretical monolayer capacity (Qm) of 714.2 mg/g. Overall, the findings demonstrate that CeO2 nanoparticles possess a strong affinity toward Pb2+ ions and exhibit promising adsorption performance, indicating their potential applicability for the treatment of lead-contaminated wastewater and their suitability for reuse following regeneration.

1. Introduction

Heavy metal pollution from industrial activities poses serious threats to both environmental and human health [1,2]. Among these contaminants, lead (Pb2+) is one of the most toxic and persistent metals found in wastewater generated by battery manufacturing, mining operations, electroplating industries, and pigment production [3,4]. Even at trace levels, lead exposure can cause severe neurological, renal, cardiovascular, and developmental disorders [5,6]. The toxicity of lead is primarily attributed to its ability to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), deplete antioxidants such as glutathione, and induce oxidative stress, ultimately causing lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA damage [7]. In aquatic environments, Pb2+ disrupts membrane integrity and central nervous system function in marine organisms. Lead accumulates in fish gills during respiration, contributing to food-chain contamination and posing health risks to humans [7,8].
Lead naturally exists in human tissues at minimal levels (10 μg/dL for adults and 1.4 μg/dL for children), but concentrations beyond these limits are associated with significant health concerns, such as reproductive impairment and fetal development disorders [9,10]. At high exposure levels, lead can cause serious damage to the nervous system, kidneys, and skeletal tissues [7]. Regulatory agencies have established strict limits to minimize exposure: the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets the permissible concentration for Pb2+ in wastewater at 50 μg/L [11], while the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for drinking water is 0.03 μM/L [7]. These constraints highlight the urgent need for efficient, economical, and environmentally safe technologies for lead removal.
Several conventional methods, such as chemical precipitation [12], ion exchange [13], membrane filtration [14], bioremediation [15], photocatalysis [16], electrocoagulation [17], and electrochemical treatments [18], have been used to remove lead from contaminated water. However, these techniques often suffer from high operational costs, low selectivity, the need for chemical additives, and limited effectiveness at low metal concentrations. In contrast, adsorption has emerged as a highly promising alternative due to its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, environmental compatibility, and ability to efficiently remove metal ions even at low concentrations [19,20,21].
A variety of adsorbents, including activated carbon [22], clays [23], algae-based biosorbents [24], and chitosan [25], have been studied for Pb2+ removal. Despite their advantages, many of these materials show limited adsorption capacity, poor regeneration ability, or insufficient selectivity. Recently, nanomaterials have gained significant attention as high-performance adsorbents owing to their large surface area, tunable surface chemistry, and enhanced reactivity. For instance, magnetic nanoparticles [26], silver nanoparticles [27], and zinc oxide nanoparticles [28] have demonstrated exceptional lead removal efficiency and improved reusability. Functionalization of nanomaterials with specific chemical groups can further enhance selectivity in complex water matrices.
Among various nanomaterials, cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs) have attracted increasing attention due to their unique physicochemical properties, including high oxygen storage capacity, redox activity, thermal stability, and surface reactivity [29,30]. These characteristics make CeO2 a promising material for catalysis, sensing, biomedical applications, and environmental remediation. However, despite growing interest, the use of CeO2 specifically as an adsorbent for Pb2+ ions remains relatively underexplored. Reported adsorption capacities vary widely, likely due to differences in synthesis methods and resulting surface properties. For example, CeO2/CuFe2O4 nanofibers achieved a maximum Pb2+ adsorption of 972.4 mg/g [31], whereas CeO2 nanoparticles alone showed a significantly lower capacity of 128.1 mg/g [32].
Cerium oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles have attracted considerable attention in environmental remediation due to their high chemical stability, strong redox activity associated with the Ce3+/Ce4+ couple, and abundant surface oxygen vacancies. These physicochemical properties promote strong interactions with heavy metal ions, making CeO2 nanoparticles promising adsorbents for wastewater treatment applications. In the present study, pristine CeO2 nanoparticles were intentionally selected as a model material to systematically investigate their adsorption performance toward Pb2+ ions and to establish fundamental structure–adsorption relationships under controlled experimental conditions. The insights gained from this work are expected to provide a reliable reference for the future design of modified or composite CeO2-based materials with enhanced efficiency and environmental safety.
Various Donesynthesis methods have been developed for the preparation of cerium oxide nanoparticles, including hydrothermal and solvothermal processes, sol–gel techniques, combustion synthesis, and precipitation methods. Each route produces CeO2 with distinct structural and surface properties. Hydrothermal and solvothermal methods typically yield highly crystalline nanoparticles but require high temperatures, long processing times, and pressurized equipment. Sol–gel and combustion synthesis allow for compositional control but may lead to residual impurities and broad particle size distributions. In contrast, hydroxide-mediated precipitation is simple, cost-effective, and easily scalable, producing well-dispersed nanoparticles with tunable particle size, high oxygen-vacancy concentrations, and reactive surface sites. These defect-rich surfaces significantly enhance the adsorption affinity toward metal ions such as Pb2+. For these reasons, the precipitation method was selected in the present study to obtain CeO2 nanoparticles optimized for high surface reactivity and efficient heavy-metal removal.
Given these gaps, this study focuses on the synthesis of CeO2 nanoparticles via a simple, low-cost hydroxide-mediated precipitation method capable of producing well-dispersed nanomaterials. The synthesized CeO2 nanoparticles were comprehensively characterized to evaluate their structural, morphological, and physicochemical properties. Their adsorption performance toward Pb2+ ions in aqueous media was systematically investigated under varying operational parameters. Additionally, adsorption kinetics and isotherm models were analyzed to better understand the mechanism and efficiency of lead removal. This work aims to demonstrate the potential of CeO2 nanoparticles as an effective, sustainable adsorbent for treating lead-contaminated water and to provide a foundation for the future development of advanced nanomaterials for environmental remediation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Cerium nitrate hexahydrate [Ce(NO3)3·6H2O], ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH),Lead Nitrite (Pb(NO3)2 and methanol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Instrumentation

2.2.1. UV–Visible Spectroscopy

UV–visible absorption spectra were recorded using a PerkinElmer Lambda 950 UV–Vis spectrophotometer between 200 and 800 nm. The CeO2 nanoparticle samples were dispersed in distilled water and analyzed at room temperature.

2.2.2. FT-IR Spectroscopy

The FTIR spectra of the synthesized cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs) were obtained using a FTIR spectra were recorded using a PerkinElmer Spectrum FTIR spectrometer (PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The measurements were carried out in the spectral range of 4000–400 cm−1 to identify the functional groups and metal–oxygen vibrations associated with Ce–O bonding.

2.2.3. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

High- resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) was performed using JEOL JEM-2100F transmission electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) (or equivalent) running at a higher speed voltage of 200 kV. To prepare the samples, a small amount of the nanoparticle dispersion was placed on a copper grid coated with a thin carbon film and allowed to dry under ambient conditions.

2.2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

SEM imaging was performed using a JEOL JCM-5100 scanning electron microscope(JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operated via a dedicated computer workstation. This provided morphological characterization of the synthesized nanomaterials.

2.2.5. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) measurements were performed using a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker AXS SE, Karlsruhe, Germany) fitted with a Cu Kα radioactive source (λ = 1.5406 Å), running at 40 mA and 40 kV in Bragg–Brentano geometry.

2.2.6. Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy

The evaluations were conducted using a JEOL JED-2200 energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) system coupled with a scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). The evaluations were conducted in high vacuum with an enhanced charge of 20 kV. Characteristic X-ray emissions were analyzed to identify the elemental composition. The resulting spectra were processed using standard ZAF (atomic number, absorption, and fluorescence) corrections for semi-quantitative analysis.

2.2.7. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) Surface Area Analysis

The Micrometrics ASAP 2020 surface space and pore analyzer was used to determine particular surface areas and pore properties. The nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms were studied at 77 K (−196 °C) after specimens had been degassed at 120 °C under vacuum for 12 h. The BET surface area was approximated from the adsorption values within the corresponding pressure band P/P0 = 0.05–0.30 using the BET equation. The total volume of pore space was computed at P/P0 ≈ 0.99, and pore size distribution was derived from the desorption branch using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method.

2.2.8. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Thermal resistance was determined using a NETZSCH TG 209 F1 thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) (NETZSCH-Gerätebau GmbH, Selb, Germany). A catalytic powder sample weighing 6.575 mg was put in a vessel made of alumina and subjected to heating from ambient temperature to 800 °C. at a constant heating speed of 10 K/min in an air atmosphere. Mass loss was monitored to evaluate thermal degradation behavior.

2.3. Synthesis of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles

A hydroxide-mediated precipitation method was employed due to its effectiveness in producing uniformly dispersed CeO2 nanoparticles, as reported in previous studies [1,2]. First, a 0.2 M solution of cerium nitrate hexahydrate [Ce(NO3)3·6H2O] and a 0.6 M ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) solution were prepared by dissolving the respective reagents in 100 mL of distilled water in separate 200 mL beakers. The NH4OH solution was transferred to a clean burette, positioned above a beaker containing the cerium nitrate solution, and placed on a magnetic stirrer. Under continuous stirring, the ammonium hydroxide was added slowly and dropwise to the cerium nitrate solution until complete precipitation was achieved.
The resulting suspension was centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 20 min, and the supernatant was decanted. The precipitate was washed three times with distilled water and once with methanol to remove remaining ions and soluble impurities. The purified solid was then dried in a vacuum oven at 110 °C for 12 h. After drying, the material was gently ground using a mortar and pestle to obtain a fine powder. Finally, to ensure complete dehydration and improve crystallinity, the powder was calcined at 500 °C for 3 h in air, which improves dehydration, crystallinity, and removal of organic residuals commonly associated with precipitation methods, yielding the final CeO2 nanoparticles.

2.4. Adsorption Experiments

Batch experiments were performed to investigate the efficient elimination of lead ions from sewage. Several factors influencing adsorption performance were investigated. A model Pb2+ solution was prepared by dissolving an accurately measured amount of Pb(NO3)2 in distilled water, followed by ultrasonic treatment for 30 min to ensure complete dissolution and homogenization. Cerium oxide (CeO2) was used as the adsorbent to assess the consequences of various parameters, including interaction time, dosage, temperature, and pH. In addition, after analyzing the experimental data, the kinetics and mechanism of the adsorption process were explored. R represents the removal efficiency (%), indicating the proportion of Pb2+ removed from the solution, and the adsorption capacity (qe) was determined using the following formulas:
R   =   ( C 0 C ) C 0 × 100 %
q e = ( C 0 C ) C 0 ×   V m
In this context, R reflects the speed of removal (%), qe denotes the adsorption capacity (mg/g), C0 is the initial concentration of the wastewater sample (mg/L), C is the final concentration of the wastewater after adsorption (mg/L), and V refers to the volume of the wastewater sample.

2.5. Kinetic Adsorption Studies

To investigate the adsorption kinetics and determine the equilibrium time, a fixed amount of CeO2 was added to Pb2+ solutions and agitated over various time intervals at a constant temperature (°C).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Nanoparticle Characterization

3.1.1. Chemical Structural Investigation

The chemical structure of the synthesized CeO2 nanoparticles was thoroughly investigated using a variety of analytical techniques, including UV–visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). In the ultraviolet region, cerium atoms within the CeO2 lattice are capable of absorbing photons, which excite outer electrons to higher energy states. As a result, the UV-Vis absorption spectrum was examined to probe these electronic transitions. Figure 1a presents the UV–visible optical absorption spectra of the synthesized CeO2 nanoparticles across the electromagnetic wavelength range from 200 to 600 nm. The UV-Vis spectrum of CeO2 nanoparticles reveals a distinct absorption band at 269 nm, a feature in line with the standard electrical structure of CeO2. This absorption profile confirms the successful synthesis of CeO2 nanoparticles, in agreement with previous reports [33,34]. FTIR spectroscopy is a powerful analytical method used to identify the chemical composition and functional groups in organic, polymeric, and occasionally inorganic materials. The FTIR spectrum of the synthesized CeO2 nanoparticles, shown in Figure 1b, was captured over the entire range of 400–4000 cm−1, providing insights into the characteristic chemical bonds and functional arrangements found in the substance. The observed peaks in the FTIR spectrum of the CeO2 nanoparticles (2370, 2171, 2090, 1973, 1003, 868, and 500 cm−1) correspond to typical vibrational modes of CeO2. The peaks at 2370 cm−1 and 2171 cm−1 are attributed to surface adsorption of atmospheric CO2 or residual carbon-containing species, as well as O–H vibrations associated with moisture or surface hydroxyl groups. Such features are standard in nanoparticle samples, which are susceptible to environmental exposure. The 2090 cm−1 and 1973 cm−1 peaks are attributed to oxygen vacancies or surface defects, a hallmark characteristic of CeO2 nanoparticles. These peaks are indicative of the presence of Ce3+ defects or local vibrational modes associated with oxygen vacancies, which are essential for the catalytic function of CeO2. The 1003 cm−1 and 868 cm−1 peaks correspond to the well-known F2g and T2g vibrational modes of the CeO2 lattice, reflecting the symmetric stretching of oxygen ions and lattice vibrations, respectively. These are key features of the CeO2 fluorite structure and confirm the material’s crystallinity. Lastly, the 500 cm−1 peak is attributed to low-frequency lattice vibrations or defect-related modes, commonly observed in nanoparticles since they are smaller than bulk and have a different surface-to-volume relationship than CeO2 [35].
Figure 1c displays the high-quality X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) spectrum of cerium (Ce), which clearly reveals the 3d spin-orbit splitting states: 3d5/2 and 3d3/2. The highest values observed at binding forces (BE) of 906.6 eV and 891.9 eV correspond to the Ce4+ 3d3/2 and Ce4+ 3d5/2 states, respectively. These peaks are characteristic of the Ce4+ oxidation state in the CeO2 lattice. Furthermore, the peaks at 897.2 eV and 886.7 eV are ascribed to the Ce3+ 3d3/2 and Ce3+ 3d5/2 states, indicative of Ce3+ species, which typically arise due to the presence of oxygen vacancies in the material. These findings are consistent with previous reports in the literature [36,37,38], confirming the coexistence of Ce4+ and Ce3+ species in CeO2 nanoparticles. Furthermore, the deconvoluted peaks at 874.0 eV and 880.1 eV are allocated to the ‘shake-up’ remote functionalities of Ce, which are characteristic of the Ce3+ oxidation state. These satellite peaks are often observed due to strong electron-electron interactions within the cerium 3d orbitals. The presence of these features suggests that the CeO2 nanoparticles contain a significant number of Ce3+ species, which can be explained by vacant oxygen spaces in the structure, facilitating the transformation between Ce3+ and Ce4+ states. Figure 1d displays the O 1 s XPS spectrum of the CeO2 nanoparticles, which was deconvoluted into two distinct peaks. The central peak at 532.5 eV (Oa) is ascribed to lattice oxygen (O2−), a characteristic feature of the cubic fluorite structure of CeO2 [36,37,38]. The peaks at 522.5 eV (Oβ) and (Oc) are attributed to oxygen vacancies and adsorbed oxygen species on the cerium surface. The presence of these surface oxygen species further supports the idea that oxygen vacancies play an essential part in the transformation of Ce3+ to Ce4+ and may influence the material’s catalytic properties. These results are consistent with earlier investigations. [36,37,38], which highlight the significance of oxygen vacancies in the structural and electronic properties of CeO2 nanoparticles.

3.1.2. Elemental and Structural Analyses

The elemental composition and structural characteristics of the synthesized CeO2 nanoparticles were thoroughly studied. Figure 2a displays the X-ray diffraction pattern of the as- produced CeO2 nanoparticles. The diffraction peaks observed at 2θ values of 28°, 32.5°, 47°, 56°, 59°, and 69° correspond to the (111), (200), (220), (311), (222), and (400) lattice planes, respectively. These well-defined peaks confirm the crystalline nature of the CeO2 nanoparticles, indicating that the material adopts a highly ordered structure. The results are consistent with the standard cubic fluorite structure of CeO2 [39,40]. These values align well with the literature-reported data for cerium oxide (JCPDS 43-1002), further validating the crystalline structure of the synthesized nanoparticles. The agreement between the experimental results and the standard references highlights the successful fabrication of crystalline CeO2 nanoparticles with a well-defined cubic structure.
The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy provides further confirmation of the elemental composition of the synthesized CeO2 nanoparticles, specifically the presence of cerium (Ce) and oxygen (O). Figure 2b illustrates the elemental composition of the CeO2 sample, as established by EDX. The spectrum shows a prominent peak corresponding to the Ce Lα X-ray emission, accompanied by a smaller but distinct peak for O Kα X-ray emission, indicating the successful incorporation of both cerium and oxygen in the material. These findings confirm the presence of Ce and O as the primary constituents of the annealed CeO2 sample. The observed peaks are consistent with the expected stoichiometric composition of CeO2, further validating the synthesis process and the elemental purity of the nanoparticles.

3.1.3. Microscopy Techniques

The morphology and structural features of the synthesized CeO2 nanoparticles were examined using high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) and SEM (Figure 3). The updated HRTEM images (Figure 3a–c), recorded at nanometer-scale magnifications (50–100 nm), clearly reveal the crystalline nature of the nanoparticles, with well-defined lattice fringes visible in the magnified insets. These fringes confirm the formation of CeO2 with distinct interplanar spacing. The nanoparticles appear moderately dispersed with limited agglomeration, which is commonly observed in metal oxide systems.
The high-magnification SEM micrographs (Figure 3d,e) provide additional visualization of the particle morphology and surface texture. The nanoparticles exhibit a predominantly spherical shape with a noticeably rough surface, which may contribute to enhanced surface reactivity and adsorption capability. The particle size distribution histogram (Figure 3f) indicates a relatively uniform distribution, with an average particle diameter of approximately 100 nm.

3.1.4. Thermal Assessment

The thermal durability of the produced CeO2 nanomaterials was evaluated utilizing thermogravimetric analysis, which exhibited distinct weight-loss stages across different temperature regions (Figure 4). In the low-temperature range, a noticeable endothermic event was observed around 110 °C, accompanied by a mass loss of approximately 1.58%, as evident from the TGA profile. This initial weight reduction is primarily attributed to the dehydration of the nanoparticles, linked to the removal of physically adsorbed and surface-bound water molecules. This mass loss corresponds to the removal of physically adsorbed water and the decomposition of residual hydroxyl groups on the surface of the CeO2 nanoparticles, consistent with the thermal behavior expected for CeO2 prepared by hydroxide-mediated precipitation [41]. A second modest weight-loss area exists between 150 °C and 250 °C, related to the disintegration of residual hydroxyl groups and traces of organic species originating from the precursor or synthesis route. Beyond 250 °C, the TGA curve exhibited negligible weight loss (less than 1%), indicating the formation of a stable CeO2 crystalline structure. The total weight loss recorded was approximately 5–6% up to 500 °C, confirming the high thermal stability and predominantly inorganic nature of the nanoparticles, which is advantageous for practical applications in water treatment and adsorption processes.

3.1.5. Surface Area and Porosity Analysis

The outcomes of the surface area and porous dimensions assessment of CeO2 particles particles are summarized in Table 1. The results indicate that the material possesses a well-developed and accessible surface. The BET method provides a moderate surface area of 118.96 m2/g, suggesting a significant amount of surface available for adsorption. This is complemented by a pore volume of 0.3962 cc/g, indicating that the material can adsorb and store gases effectively. The Langmuir technique, predicated on the assumption of single-layer adsorption, provides an elevated surface area of 205.62 m2/g, which suggests that CeO2 has a highly ordered surface with minimal multilayer adsorption, making it potentially useful in applications requiring high surface interactions, such as catalysis.
The BJH adsorption and desorption methods provide further insights into the material’s pore structure. The surface area obtained by BJH adsorption (85.67 m2/g) and desorption (105.93 m2/g) is somewhat lower than that from the Langmuir method. However, it aligns with the presence of mesopores (pores with diameters between 2 and 50 nm), which is consistent with the pore radius of 2.27 nm in adsorption and 5.69 nm in desorption. This suggests that the material has a mix of small and slightly larger pores, which are beneficial for various catalytic and adsorptive processes. The DFT analysis further supports the porous characteristics of CeO2, revealing a surface area of 118.98 m2/g and a mean porous radius of 6.28 nm, which highlights the material’s well-defined pore structure and large surface area, both of which are crucial for effective interactions in catalytic processes. Additionally, the overall pore volume of 0.4229 cc/g The mean pore dimension is 7.11 nm confirm that CeO2 particles are primarily mesoporous. Overall, the mixture of an extensive surface area, significant pore volume, and a well-defined mesoporous structure makes CeO2 particles highly suitable for lead adsorption and removal.

3.2. Lead Ion Removal

3.2.1. Effect of Initial Pb2+ Concentration on Adsorption Performance

The effect of varying initial Pb2+ ion concentrations on adsorption performance was examined under consistent experimental conditions, using 0.01 g of CeO2 added to 50 mL of Pb2+ solution, an interval of communication of 30 min, and agitation at 150 rpm. A range of initial Pb2+ concentrations (5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 100, and 200 mg/L) was employed to evaluate changes in both adsorption capacity and removal efficiency. As depicted in Figure 5a, the adsorption capacity (qe) exhibited a rising trend with increasing initial metal ion concentration, spanning from 10 to 350 mg/g. This behavior is likely due to the intensified concentration gradient at higher Pb2+ levels, which promotes an intensified impetus for transferring mass, consequently augmenting the interaction between Pb2+ ions and the active sites available on the CeO2 surface.
Conversely, the removal efficiency (R%), shown in Figure 5b, decreased from 84.18% to 70% with increasing initial concentrations. This inverse relationship is commonly observed in adsorption systems and is primarily owing to the depletion of available adsorption sites at higher solute concentrations. Once the adsorbent surface becomes saturated, typically at lower concentrations, further increases in Pb2+ concentration do not proportionally increase the amount removed from solution.

3.2.2. Influence of Adsorption Time on Pb2+ Removal

The influence of interface time for elimination efficiency of Pb2+ ions was examined by altering the adsorption time from 15 to 1440 min at a fixed temperature of 298 K. The experiments were conducted using 0.01 g of CeO2 and an initial Pb2+ concentration of 45 mg/L. The effects of contact time on both the adsorption capacity (qe) and removal effectiveness (R%) are presented in Figure 6a,b. As illustrated in the figures, the adsorption capacity (qe) increased from 58.5 to 107.25 mg/g as the contact time increased. Notably, the removal efficiency (R%) rose sharply during the initial adsorption phase, reaching 52.18% within the first 10 min, and continued to increase more gradually thereafter, stabilizing around 90% by 1440 min. This fast initial adoption can be attributable to the quantity of unoccupied active locations on the CeO2 surface, which enhances the absorption of Pb2+ ions. As the adsorption process progressed, these active sites gradually became occupied, and the system approached equilibrium. The observed stabilization of removal efficiency suggests that most accessible binding sites were saturated. The slight increase in qe over time, despite the plateau in the effectiveness of elimination, can be ascribed to the diffusion of Pb2+ ions into mesopores or microporous regions within the CeO2 structure, allowing for continued but slower adsorption beyond the external surface.
Equilibrium was effectively achieved around 1400 min, indicating this duration as optimal under the given experimental conditions.

3.3. Influence of Initial pH on Pb2+ Adsorption

The pH is a significant aspect in adsorption investigations, as it influences both the chemical form of the solute and the surface characteristics of the adsorbent. To evaluate its effect on Pb2+ ion removal, the pH was systematically varied from 1 to 8 at a constant temperature of 298 K. The experiments were conducted using a CeO2 concentration of 45 mg/L, with an adsorbent mass of 0.01 g and a contact time fixed at 30 min. Figure 7a,b illustrate the relationship between pH and both the adsorption capacity (qe) and removal efficiency (R%). Results showed that the quantity of extractable increased from 9.25 mg/g at pH 1 to 60 mg/g at pH 6, while the removal efficiency improved from 12.33% to 80%. These trends underscore the pivotal role of pH in regulating the adsorption process, particularly through its impact on the adsorbent surface charge and Pb2+ speciation in solution. At low pH levels, the CeO2 surface becomes heavily protonated, acquiring a positive charge that repels Pb2+ ions and thus reduces adsorption. As the pH increased, the deprotonation of surface functional groups reduced the positive charge on the CeO2 surface, possibly resulting in a neutral or even negatively charged surface that enhanced the electrostatic attraction between the adsorbent and Pb2+ ions. However, the available figures do not show detailed adsorption behavior for pH values above 6, and therefore, the claim that adsorption ‘no longer increases significantly’ beyond this point cannot be confirmed from the presented data and the impact of pH solution on Figure 7.
Thus, pH 6 represents the highest pH value for which complete experimental data are provided, and under these conditions, the adsorption capacity and removal efficiency reached their maximum observed values in this study.

3.4. Adsorption Isotherm Models

The Langmuir isotherm implies optimal single-layer adsorption onto an evenly distributed surface with a restricted number of similar, energetically comparable sites [42]. It further presumes that each site accommodates only one adsorbate molecule and that there are no interactions between adsorbed species. This model is often applied to describe systems where surface saturation is attainable. The following equation represents the Langmuir model’s linear equation:
C e q e = 1 Q m . b + 1 Q m × C e
Here, Ce represents the equilibrium concentration of lead ions in solution (mg/L), qe denotes the quantity of Pb2+ adsorbed per unit mass of CeO2 at equilibrium (mg/g), the parameter Qm refers to the theoretical maximum adsorption capacity assuming single-layer coverage (mg/g), and b is the Langmuir constant relating to the attraction of binding sites (L/mg). The parameters Qm and b were determined from the linearized Langmuir graph of Ce/qe versus Ce (as shown in Figure 8a).
The efficiency of the adsorption process was further evaluated by applying the non-dimensional separation factor, Rs, which was determined utilizing the following formula:
R L =   1 b C I  
Ci designates the initial concentration of CeO2 in the solution (mg/L). The dimensionless separation factor, Rs, gives insights into the functioning of the adsorption process. Depending on its value, adsorption can be classified as irrevocable (Rs = 0) and positive (0 < Rs < 1), linear (Rs = 1), or unfavorable (Rs > 1). The parameters b, Qm, and Rs are consolidated in Table 2. The fact that Rs parameters fall within the range of 0 to 1 confirms that Pb2+ adsorption onto CeO2 is favorable under the tested conditions. Among the evaluated models, the Langmuir isotherm demonstrated the greatest fit to the data obtained from experiments, as demonstrated by a higher correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.97) in contrast to the Freundlich model (R2 = 0.89). The Langmuir model yielded a theoretical monolayer adsorption capacity of 714.28 mg/g, suggesting a high potential adsorption capability under idealized conditions.
It is important to note that the Qm value is theoretical and derived from model extrapolation; the highest experimentally measured adsorption capacity in this study was qe,exp = 192 mg/g. This discrepancy reflects the ideal assumptions of the Langmuir model compared to real experimental limitations such as incomplete site accessibility, surface heterogeneity, and kinetic constraints.
Overall, the Langmuir model indicates a strong affinity between Pb2+ ions and CeO2 surface sites, while the experimental data provide a more realistic measure of actual adsorption performance.
In contrast, the Freundlich isotherm is an experimental model that is suitable for diverse surfaces, where adsorption sites possess varying affinities and energies. Unlike the Langmuir model, the Freundlich model does not anticipate a point of saturation and is thus applicable to multilayer adsorption processes. The Freundlich equation includes a heterogeneity factor (1/n), which indicates the degree of surface heterogeneity and adsorption intensity; values of 1/n closer to zero reflect more substantial heterogeneity and higher adsorption affinity. Together, these models provide a comprehensive framework for knowing the Adsorption Behavior and capacity of the synthesized nanocomposite under equilibrium conditions. The linear representation of the Freundlich equation is articulated as follows:
log q e = log K f +   1 n   log C e  
where kf is the Freundlich factor proportional to adsorption capacity (mg/g), and nf is the adsorption intensity. These results were calculated using the slope and intercept of the linear relationship between ln qe and ln Ce Figure 8b. Table 2 displays the values that were obtained. The Freundlich model demonstrates a heterogeneity factor (1/n) of 0.35 (n = 2.88), indicating moderately favorable adsorption on a heterogeneous surface. The Freundlich constant Kf was calculated to be 4.22, suggesting a reasonable adsorption capacity but less predictive power compared to the Langmuir model. The kinetic results, together with the surface characterization, suggest that Pb2+ adsorption onto CeO2 nanoparticles proceeds predominantly through chemisorption. This process may involve several chemical interactions, including electron transfer between Pb2+ ions and Ce3+/Ce4+ redox sites, the formation of inner-sphere surface complexes, and coordination bonding with surface oxygen atoms or hydroxyl groups (–OH) present on CeO2. Oxygen vacancies and Ce3+ sites on the nanoparticle surface can serve as active sites where Pb2+ ions form stable interactions, further supporting the chemisorption nature of the process. To better highlight the novelty of the present work, a comparative analysis of various nanocomposite adsorbents for lead (Pb2+) removal reveals a broad spectrum of performance efficiencies based on Factors such as adsorbent quantity, pH value, interaction duration, and adsorption capacity (Qm) (Table 3). Most studies employed slightly acidic to neutral pH conditions (pH 4–8), which are favorable for lead ion adsorption due to minimal competition from hydrogen ions. The adsorption capacities varied considerably, with CeO2/CuFe2O4 (972.4 mg/g) and UiO-66-NH2 (692.8 mg/g) exhibiting the highest Qm values, although the latter lacked complete operational data. The Langmuir model predicted a theoretical monolayer capacity (Qm) of 714.2 mg/g for the CeO2 nanocomposite; however, the highest experimentally measured adsorption capacity was 192 mg/g, with a maximum removal efficiency of 80% at pH 6 under the tested conditions. Although the contact time was long (1440 min), the results still indicate a strong affinity of the CeO2 surface for Pb2+ ions. Other notable materials include hydroxyapatite nanostructures and silica spheres, which also achieved high adsorption capacities (322.6 and 266.89 mg/g, respectively) at low dosages and short contact times. Low-dosage, high-efficiency materials, such as La2S3@MGO and CeO2 (as identified in previous studies), further highlight the role of material surface chemistry and morphology in performance. Although some materials achieved 100% removal (e.g., magnetite oxide and starch/cellulose-capped MNPs), their adsorption capacities were comparatively lower, indicating possible rapid surface saturation. Overall, the CeO2 nanocomposite reported in this work compares favorably with existing adsorbents and offers a promising avenue for efficient lead remediation, especially where high adsorption capacity is prioritized.

3.5. Adsorption Kinetics Model

The kinetics of adsorption elucidate the rate and mechanisms by which adsorbate molecules engage with the adsorbent’s surface. Acquiring a comprehensive understanding of these dynamics is crucial for assessing the efficacy and feasibility of adsorption systems, particularly in environmental applications such as the elimination of heavy metals. Commonly applied kinetic models include the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models, which help elucidate whether physical or chemical interactions govern the process. The pseudo-first order (Lagergren equation) is written as follows:
l n q e q t = l n q e k 1 × t
where qt, qe are the quantity adsorbed at time t and at equilibrium (mg.g−1), respectively. For the adsorption process, t is the time (min), and k1 is the PFO rate constant (min−1). PFO rate constants k1 and qe were estimated using the slopes and intercepts of the charts between ln (qe−qt) against t in Figure 9a. Table 4 provides a summary of these values. The lack of fitting alignment between the values of qe cal and qe exp is evident from the data, showing that this model is not as suitable for elucidating the adsorption processes. The following is the expression for the pseudo-second order (PSO) kinetics equation:
t q t   =   1 k 2 q e 2 +   1 q e   .   t
In this model, k2 represents the rate constant of the pseudo-second order (PSO) kinetic equation (g.mg−1·min−1). The values of k2 and the theoretical adsorption capacity (qe, cal) were derived from the slope and intercept of the linear plot of t/qt vs. t (illustrated in Figure 9b), with corresponding data summarized in Table 4. The results indicate that the correlation coefficients (R2) for the PSO model were persistently superior to those for the pseudo-first order (PFO) model.
Although the PSO model exhibited a higher correlation coefficient than the PFO model, the calculated adsorption capacity (qe, cal) differed significantly from the experimental value (qe, exp), indicating that the PSO model captures the kinetic trend but does not precisely predict the absolute adsorption capacity. This suggests that the rate-limiting step may involve chemisorption, characterized by electron transfer or exchange between adsorbent and adsorbate.
The kinetic parameters show that the pseudo-second order (PSO) model provides a better description of Pb2+ adsorption onto CeO2 nanoparticles than the pseudo-first order (PFO) model, as indicated by its higher correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.99). However, the calculated adsorption capacity for the PSO model (qe, cal = 109.69 mg/g) deviates noticeably from the experimental value (qe, exp = 192 mg/g), demonstrating that although the PSO model accurately represents the kinetic trend, it does not precisely predict the equilibrium adsorption capacity. In contrast, the PFO model significantly underestimates adsorption capacity (qe, cal = 4.93 mg/g), further confirming its unsuitability for describing this system. Overall, the kinetic analysis suggests that the adsorption process is likely governed by chemisorption, involving electron transfer or sharing between Pb2+ ions and the CeO2 nanoparticle surface.

3.6. Regeneration and Disposal of Spent Adsorbent

Regeneration of CeO2-based adsorbents is performed using dilute HCl, which efficiently desorbs Pb2+ ions from the nanoparticle surface. After acid treatment, the material is thoroughly rinsed with distilled water and dried to restore its adsorption capability for reuse. In this study, regeneration testing showed that the CeO2 adsorbent retained approximately 95% of its initial adsorption capacity after treatment with dilute HCl, demonstrating that the material maintains its integrity and remains suitable for subsequent adsorption cycles. For disposal, Pb2+-loaded CeO2 nanoparticles must be managed as hazardous waste and immobilized or solidified to prevent secondary contamination. These practices contribute to the safe and sustainable use of CeO2-based materials in water treatment applications.

4. Conclusions

In this study, CeO2 nanoparticles were synthesized through a simple and cost-effective hydroxide-mediated precipitation method. Structural and physicochemical characterization (XRD, SEM, TEM, FTIR, BET, UV–Vis) confirmed well-crystallized, uniformly distributed nanoparticles with an average size of ~100 nm, a high surface area of 118.96 m2/g, and mesoporous features favorable for adsorption.
Adsorption experiments demonstrated effective Pb2+ removal, achieving an experimental capacity of 192 mg/g and 80% removal at pH 6. The process followed pseudo-second-order kinetics, indicating chemisorption, while the Langmuir model provided the best isotherm fit with a theoretical monolayer capacity of 714.2 mg/g. Overall, CeO2 nanoparticles showed strong affinity for Pb2+ and promising performance as a low-cost and sustainable adsorbent for contaminated water. Regeneration with dilute HCl maintained about 95% of the initial adsorption capacity, supporting their potential for reuse. These findings offer a solid basis for developing CeO2-based composites, improving regeneration cycles, and advancing safer disposal strategies for environmentally sustainable water treatment.

Author Contributions

Methodology, B.M.; Software, A.E.M.E.M.; Validation, B.M.; Formal analysis, A.E.M.E.M.; Investigation, B.M.; Data curation, B.M.; Writing—original draft, B.M.; Writing—review & editing, B.M.; Visualization, B.M.; Supervision, B.M. and A.E.M.E.M.; Project administration, B.M.; Funding acquisition, A.E.M.E.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The Researcher would like to thank the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Qassim University for financial support (QU-APC-2026).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Ilahi, I. Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology of Hazardous Heavy Metals: And Ecotoxicology of Hazardous Heavy Metals: Environmental Persistence, Toxicity, and Bioaccumulation. J. Chem. 2019, 2019, 6730305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kotnala, S.; Tiwari, S.; Nayak, A.; Bhushan, B.; Chandra, S.; Medeiros, M.; Coutinho, H.D.M. Impact of heavy metal toxicity on human health and the environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 987, 17978541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jomova, K.; Alomar, S.Y.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Valko, M. Heavy Metals: Toxicity and Human Health Effects; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; Volume 99, p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ondrasek, G.; Shepherd, J.; Rathod, S.; Dharavath, R.; Rashid, M.I.; Brtnicky, M.; Shahid, M.S.; Horvatinec, J.; Rengel, Z. Metal contamination—A global environmental issue: Sources, implications & advances in mitigation. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 3904–3927. [Google Scholar]
  5. Olufemi, A.C.; Mji, A.; Mukhola, M.S. Potential Health Risks of Lead Exposure from Early Life through Later Life: Implications for Public Health Education. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Collin, M.S.; Venkatraman, S.K.; Vijayakumar, N.; Kanimozhi, V.; Arbaaz, M.S.; Stacey, R.G.S.; Anusha, J.; Choudhary, R.; Gabriel, V.L.; Tovar, I.; et al. Bioaccumulation of lead (Pb) and its effects on human: A. review. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2022, 7, 100094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oladimeji, T.E.; Oyedemi, M.; Emetere, M.E.; Agboola, O.; Adeoye, J.B.; Odunlami, O.A. Review on the impact of heavy metals from industrial wastewater effluent and removal technologies. Heliyon 2024, 10, e40370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abera, B.D.; Adimas, M.A. Health benefits and health risks of contaminated fish consumption: Current research outputs, research approaches, and perspectives. Heliyon 2024, 10, e33905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nag, R.; Cummins, E. Human health risk assessment of lead (Pb) through the environmental-food pathway. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 810, 151168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Balachandar, R.; Bagepally, B.S.; Kalahasthi, R.; Haridoss, M. Blood lead levels and male reproductive hormones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Toxicology 2020, 443, 152574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rezania, S.; Mojiri, A.; Park, J.; Nawrot, N.; Wojciechowska, E.; Marraiki, N.; Zaghloul, N.S.S. Removal of lead ions from wastewater using lanthanum sulfide nanoparticle decorated over magnetic graphene oxide. Environ. Res. 2022, 204, 111959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zitong, X.; Siwei, G.; Dipak, R.; Takeshi, M.; Christopher, Q.L. Chemical precipitation enabled UF and MF filtration for lead removal. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 41, 101987. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jasim, A.Q.; Ajjam, S.K. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater using ion exchange resin in a batch process with kinetic isotherm. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2024, 49, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Manawi, Y.; McKay, G.; Ismail, N.; Fard, A.K.; Kochkodan, V.; Atieh, M.A. Enhancing lead removal from water by complex-assisted filtration with acacia gum. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 352, 828–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Monica, R.; Paola, G.; Elisa, M.; Mery, F. Debora, Bioremediation methods for the recovery of lead-contaminated soils: A review. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3528. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shakir, H.A.; Alsaffar, M.A.; Mageed, A.K.; Sukkar, K.A.; Ghany, M.A.A. Optimizing Photocatalytic Lead Removal from Wastewater Using ZnO/ZrO2: A Response Surface Methodology Approach. Chem. Eng. 2024, 8, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aljaberi, F.Y.; Mohammed, W.T. Analyzing the removal of lead from synthesis wastewater by electrocoagulation technique using experimental design. Desalin. Water Treat. 2018, 111, 286–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.X.; Yan, J.M.; Yuan, D.X.; Li, Q.L.; Wu, X.Y. The study of lead removal from aqueous solution using an electrochemical method with a stainless steel net electrode coated with single wall carbon nanotubes. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 218, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Satyam, S.; Patra, S. Innovations and challenges in adsorption-based wastewater remediation: A comprehensive review. Heliyon 2024, 10, e29573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Asma, S.; Mehwish, S.; Muhammad, I. Application potential of grapefruit peel as dye sorbent: Kinetics, equilibrium and mechanism of crystal violet adsorption. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 179, 564–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Akhtar, M.S.; Ali, S.; Zaman, W. Innovative Adsorbents for Pollutant Removal: Exploring the Latest Research and Applications. Molecules 2024, 29, 4317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Futalan, C.C.; Diana, E.; Edang, M.F.A.; Padilla, J.M.; Cenia, M.C.; Alfeche, D.M. Adsorption of Lead from Aqueous Solution Using Activated Carbon Derived from Rice Husk Modified with Lemon Juice. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xie, S.; Huang, L.; Su, C.; Yan, J.; Chen, Z.; Li, M.; Du, M.; Zhang, H. Application of clay minerals as adsorbents for removing heavy metals from the environment. Green Smart Min. Eng. 2024, 1, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Oyebamiji, O.O.; Corcoran, A.A.; Edauri, N.P.; Matthew, O.I.; Olukayode, O.A.; Omar, F.H.; Wiebke, J.P. Lead tolerance and bioremoval by four strains of green algae from Nigerian fish ponds. Algal Res. 2021, 58, 102403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ali, G.; Helally, M.; Alani, M.A.F.; Alardah, A.H.S.; Khataby, R.A.M.; Fazili, M.Y.; Al-Maki, J.H.A.; Mohamed, A.; Sliem, M.H.R.; Al-Qahtani, N. Green Innovation:Harnessing Chitosan Hydrogel Beads for Sustainable Lead Removal in Wastewater Treatment towards Qatar Vision. Mater. Proc. 2024, 18, 10. [Google Scholar]
  26. Shahzad, A.; Aslibeiki, B.; Slimani, S.; Ghosh, S.; Vocciante, M.; Grotti, M.; Comite, A.; Peddis, D.; Sarkar, T. Magnetic nanocomposite for lead (II) removal from water. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 17674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Attatsi, I.K.; Nsiah, F. Application of silver nanoparticles toward Co(II) and Pb(II) ions contaminant removal in groundwater. Appl. Water Sci. 2020, 10, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aruja, T.C.; Sharma, R.; Dhiman, V.; Chand, S.; Choudhary, P.; Kondal, N. ZnO based nanoadsorbents for purification of lead contaminated water. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 48, 1320–1324. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hadole, P.; Mondal, S.; Shingda, S.; Ahmed, M.Z.; Mule, A.; Rai, A.R.; Ayub, A.; Alone, H.; Mondal, A. Green and Biogenic Synthesis of Cerium Oxide (CeO2) Nanoparticles: Heterogeneous Catalytic Synthesis of Isoxazol-5(4H)-one Derivatives and Assessment of Their Antibacterial Activity. Chem. Select. 2025, 10, e202406123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mohajeri, M.; Momenai, R.; Karami-Mohajeri, S.; Ohadi, M.; Raeisi Estabragh, M.A. Cerium oxide nanoparticles, physical and chemical properties, applications and toxicological implications: A review. Results Chem. 2025, 15, 102302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Talebzadeh, F.; Zandipak, R.; Sobhanardakani, S. CeO2 nanoparticles supported on CuFe2O4 nanofibers as novel adsorbent for removal of Pb(II), Ni(II), and V(V) ions from petrochemical wastewater. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 28363–28377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Contreras, A.R.; Casals, E.; Puntes, V.; Komilis, D.; Sánchez, A.; Font, X. Use of cerium oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles for the adsorption of dissolved cadmium (II), lead (II) and chromium (VI) at two different pHs in single and multi-component systems. Glob. Nest J. 2015, 17, 536–543. [Google Scholar]
  33. Nurhasanah, I.; Safitri, W.; Arifin, Z.; Subagio, A.; Windarti, T. Antioxidant activity and dose enhancement factor of CeO2 nanoparticles synthesized by precipitation method. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 432, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zamiri, R.; Ahangar, H.A.; Kaushal, A.; Zakaria, A.; Zamiri, G.; Tobaldi, D.; Ferreira, J.M.F. Dielectrical properties of CeO2 nanoparticles at different temperatures. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, 4. [Google Scholar]
  35. Farahmandjou, M.; Farahmandjou, M.; Zarinkamar, M.; Firoozabadi, T.P. Synthesis of Cerium Oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles using simple CO-precipitation method. Rev. Mex. Física. 2016, 62, 496–499. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pandit, B.; Sankapal, B.R.; Koinkar, P.M. Novel chemical route for CeO2/MWCNTs composite towards highly bendable solid-state supercapacitor device. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tharani, D.S.; Sivasubramanian, R. CeO2 nanocubes-based electrochemical sensor for the selective and simultaneous determination of dopamine in the presence of uric acid and ascorbic acid. J. Chem. Sci. 2023, 135, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shi, Y.; Fu, J.; Hui, K.; Liu, J.; Gao, C.; Chang, S.; Chen, Y.; Gao, X.; Cao, T.; Xu, L.; et al. Promoting the electrochemical properties of yolk-shell-structured CeO2 composites for lithium-ion batteries. Microstructures 2021, 1, 2021005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bakkiyaraj, R.; Balakrishnan, M.; Subramanian, R. Synthesis, structural characterisation, optical studies of CeO2 nanoparticles and its cytotoxic activity. Mater. Res. Innov. 2017, 21, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Latha, P.; Prakash, K.; Karuthapandian, S. Effective Photodegradation of CR & MO dyes by morphologically controlled Cerium oxide nanocubes under visible light Illumination. Optik 2018, 154, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pop, O.L.; Mesaros, A.; Vodnar, D.C.; Suharoschi, R.; Tabaran, F.; Magerusan, L.; Todor, I.S.; Diaconeasa, Z.; Balint, A.; Ciontea, L.; et al. Cerium oxide nanoparticles and their efficient antibacterial application in vitro against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Salahshoor, S.; Fahes, M.; Teodoriu, C. A review on the effect of confinement on phase behavior in tight formations. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2018, 51, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, L.; Haziq, M.A.; Ullah, S.; Abdul Ghani, S.; Bibi, S.D.; Taqweem, U.H.; Muhammad, T.; Zihua, Y. Remediation of Lead-Contaminated Water Using Green Synthesized Iron-Oxide Nanoparticles: Performance and Mechanism. Air Soil Water Res. 2024, 17, 11786221241278517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Matter, E.A.; Hassan, A.F.; Elfaramawy, N.M.; Esmail, G. Enhanced adsorption of lead (II) ions onto cellulose nanoparticles/chitosan composite based on loofah sponge: Kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2024, 13, 10961–10976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bidhendi, M.E.; Parandi, E.; Meymand, M.M.; Sereshti, H.; Nodeh, H.R.; Joo, S.W.; Vasseghian, Y.; Mahmoudi Khatir, N.; Rezania, S. Removal of lead ions from wastewater using magnesium sulfide nanoparticles caged alginate microbeads. Environ. Res. 2023, 216, 114416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Safatian, F.; Doago, Z.; Torabbeigi, M.; Shams, H.R.; Ahadi, N. Lead ion removal from water by hydroxyapatite nanostructures synthesized from egg sells with microwave irradiation. Appl. Water Sci. 2019, 9, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Milton, M.; Nyaradzai, M.H.C.; Narsaiah, T.B.; Chakra, C.S.; Gratitude, C.; Gwiranai, D.; Tirivaviri, A.M. Adsorption of lead ions from wastewater using nano silica spheres synthesized on calcium carbonate templates. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Oana, S.; Covaliu, I.C.; Gigel, P.; Gina, A.C.; Mihai, N.L.; Ecaterina, M.; Sorin, S.B.; Paula, T. Magnetite oxide nanomaterial used for lead ions removal from industrial wastewater. Materials 2021, 14, 2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kagalkar, A.; Dharaskar, S.; Chaudhari, N. Development of MXene for removal of lead (Pb+) ions from wastewater. Water Pract. Technol. 2024, 19, 911–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hu, S.-Z.; Huang, T.; Zhang, N.; Lei, Y.-Z.; Wang, Y. Enhanced removal of lead ions and methyl orange from wastewater using polyethyleneimine grafted UiO-66-NH2 nanoparticles. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 297, 121470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. El-Shafey, S.E.; Obada, M.K.; El-Shamy, A.M.; Mohamed, W.S. Silica/klucel nanocomposite as promising durable adsorbent for lead removal from industrial effluents. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 26095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kumari, P.; Gupta, G.; Saini, M.K.; Samanta, S.; Misra, K.P. Chat-,S. ZnS Nanoparticles for Efficient Removal of Lead (II) Ions. Nano-World J. 2023, 9, 215–219. [Google Scholar]
  53. Perez, T.; Pasquini, D.; Lima, A.d.F.; Rosa, E.V.; Sousa, M.H.; Cerqueira, D.A.; Morais, L.C.D. Efficient removal of lead ions from water by magnetic nanosorbents based on manganese ferrite nanoparticles capped with thin layers of modified biopolymers. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 102892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yan, M.; Tan, Y.; Dong, H.; Xu, H.; Xiao, X.; Ling, Z.; Huang, C.; Yong, Q. Facilely constructing physical-linked γ-Fe2O3/CeO2/cellulose nanofibril films for highly effective, recyclable, and multi-removal of heavy metals and dyes from wastewater. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2025, 8, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) UV spectra of CeO2; (b) FTIR spectra of CeO2; (c) high-resolution XPS spectra of Ce (3d); and (d) high-resolution XPS spectra of O (1 s) of CeO2.
Figure 1. (a) UV spectra of CeO2; (b) FTIR spectra of CeO2; (c) high-resolution XPS spectra of Ce (3d); and (d) high-resolution XPS spectra of O (1 s) of CeO2.
Separations 13 00061 g001
Figure 2. (a) XRD spectra of CeO2; (b) EDX spectra of CeO2.
Figure 2. (a) XRD spectra of CeO2; (b) EDX spectra of CeO2.
Separations 13 00061 g002
Figure 3. HRTEM images: (a) 100 nm; (b) 75 nm; (c) 50 nm; SEM images at: (d) 100 nm; (e) 50 nm; and (f) particle size distribution histogram of CeO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 3. HRTEM images: (a) 100 nm; (b) 75 nm; (c) 50 nm; SEM images at: (d) 100 nm; (e) 50 nm; and (f) particle size distribution histogram of CeO2 nanoparticles.
Separations 13 00061 g003
Figure 4. TGA spectra of CeO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 4. TGA spectra of CeO2 nanoparticles.
Separations 13 00061 g004
Figure 5. (a) Effect of Pb2+ concentration on the amount adsorbed (qe) and (b) removal percentage (R%).
Figure 5. (a) Effect of Pb2+ concentration on the amount adsorbed (qe) and (b) removal percentage (R%).
Separations 13 00061 g005
Figure 6. The impact of adsorption time on (a) the amount adsorbed (qe) and (b) removal percentage (R%).
Figure 6. The impact of adsorption time on (a) the amount adsorbed (qe) and (b) removal percentage (R%).
Separations 13 00061 g006
Figure 7. The impact of pH solution on (a) the amount adsorbed (qe) and (b) removal percentage (R%).
Figure 7. The impact of pH solution on (a) the amount adsorbed (qe) and (b) removal percentage (R%).
Separations 13 00061 g007
Figure 8. (a) Langmuir; and (b) Freundlich model simulations on isotherm curves.
Figure 8. (a) Langmuir; and (b) Freundlich model simulations on isotherm curves.
Separations 13 00061 g008
Figure 9. Kinetic graphs of adsorption for (a) the PFO model and (b) the PSO model.
Figure 9. Kinetic graphs of adsorption for (a) the PFO model and (b) the PSO model.
Separations 13 00061 g009
Table 1. Textural properties of CeO2 nanoparticles based on BET, Langmuir, BJH, and DFT methods.
Table 1. Textural properties of CeO2 nanoparticles based on BET, Langmuir, BJH, and DFT methods.
MethodSpecific Surface Area (m2/g)Pore Volume (cc/g)Pore Radius (m)
BET (Multipoint)118.960.39622.27
Langmuir205.62N/AN/A
BJH Adsorption85.670.39622.27
BJH Desorption105.930.40285.69
DFT Method118.980.38906.28
Total Pore VolumeN/A0.4229N/A
Average Pore SizeN/AN/A7.11
Table 2. Adsorption isotherm models’ constants.
Table 2. Adsorption isotherm models’ constants.
Isotherm ModelRLEvaluated Parameters of Isotherm
Langmuir0.06Qmax (mg/g)b (L/mg)R2
714.280.500.97
Freundlich-nKfR2
-2.884.220.89
Table 3. Comparative illustration on nanocomposites for lead removal.
Table 3. Comparative illustration on nanocomposites for lead removal.
AdsorbentQuantity of Adsorbent (g/L)pHContact Time (min)Speed
(rpm)
Qm
(mg/g)
Removal (%)Ref.
Orange-peel@ Fe3O40.25.590--95[43]
Cellulose nanoparticles (CN)26.5120-221.194[44]
Alg@MgS-460-84.7490[45]
Hydroxyapatite nanostructures0.01720-322.6-[46]
Silica spheres--40-266.8999.6[47]
La2S3@MGO0.02540-98.0395[11]
Magnetite Oxide-6604001.45100[48]
MXene0.46120-43.8697[49]
UiO-66-NH20.2---692.80-[50]
Silica/klucel nanocomposite0.05-60-63.93895[51]
ZnO--4320--94[52]
Manganese ferrite (MNPs) capped with starch or cellulose25.530-46100[53]
CeO2/CuFe2O40.037150180972.492[31]
γ-Fe2O3/CeO2/cellulose nanofibril (CNF)0.5-240-42.677.6[54]
CeO20.015-130128.1-[32]
CeO20.261440150714.290The present work
Table 4. Kinetic variables and correlation coefficients for Pb2+ adsorption.
Table 4. Kinetic variables and correlation coefficients for Pb2+ adsorption.
Pseudo-First OrderPseudo-Second OrderExperimental qe
qe,cal (mg.g−1)4.92844qe,cal (mg.g−1)109.69 (mg.g−1)192 (mg.g−1)
K1 (min−1)2.77K2 (g mg−1 min−1)0.016
R20.98R20.99
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mustafa, B.; Mohammed, A.E.M.E. Structural and Surface Properties of CeO2 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Lead Ion Removal. Separations 2026, 13, 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations13020061

AMA Style

Mustafa B, Mohammed AEME. Structural and Surface Properties of CeO2 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Lead Ion Removal. Separations. 2026; 13(2):61. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations13020061

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mustafa, Bakheit, and Ard Elshifa M. E. Mohammed. 2026. "Structural and Surface Properties of CeO2 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Lead Ion Removal" Separations 13, no. 2: 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations13020061

APA Style

Mustafa, B., & Mohammed, A. E. M. E. (2026). Structural and Surface Properties of CeO2 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Lead Ion Removal. Separations, 13(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations13020061

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop