Highly Speciﬁc L-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 Inhibition by JPH203 as a Potential Pan-Cancer Treatment

: Accelerated cancer cell growth requires a massive intake of amino acids. Overexpression of L-type (large) amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) on the cancer cell membrane facilitates such a demand, which is limited in normal organs. Therefore, LAT1 overexpression is ideal as a molecular cancer therapeutic target. JPH203, a LAT1-selective non-transportable blocker, had demonstrated LAT1 inhibition in <10 µ M IC 50 values and effectively suppressed cancer cell growth in studies involving several types of cancer cell lines and tumor xenograft models. A limited phase I clinical trial was performed on ﬁve different solid tumors and showed that JPH203 is well-tolerated and has a promising activity for the treatment of bile duct cancer. This review details the development and prospect of JPH203 as a LAT1-targeting cancer therapy.


Introduction
Global Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence (GLOBOCAN) data in 2018 reported 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million cancer deaths [1], and this global burden remains increasing annually [2]. Cancer is characterized by uncontrolled cell growth and resistance to cell death as a result of the reprogramming of the energy metabolism and other survival hallmark capabilities [3]. Most of the currently used anticancer drugs are either nonselective for cancer cells or extend patients' survival only a few months.
Most chemotherapeutic agents are designed to disrupt the nucleic acid biosynthesis in rapidly developing cells [4]. Consequently, systemic chemotherapies are highly cytotoxic to the physiologically fast-growing normal cells resulting in detrimental side effects [5]. Various targeted drugs developed in the later decades were designed to work on specific molecular targets in cancer cells, thereby sparing non-target organs while retaining the therapeutic benefit [6]. However, even the most advanced targeted drugs available today, as monotherapy or in combinations to overcome tumor heterogeneity, are unable to prevent the subsequent development of drug resistance [7]. Obviously, new molecular targets are sorely needed to solve these complicated challenges of cancer treatment.
Cancer cells have independent metabolic regulation and almost always find a way to fuel their fast growth and expansion [8]. Glucose hypermetabolism (GLUT1 overexpression) Processes 2021, 9,1170 2 of 15 has been long exploited as a cancer biomarker (as seen in widely accepted oncology [ 18 F]-FDG PET imaging); however, it is not cancer-specific. Amino acid hypermetabolism, on the other hand, potentially serves as a better cancer biomarker in terms of tumorspecificity and less adverse effects to normal organs since no normal adult organs are physiologically amino acid-hypermetabolic [9]. L-type Amino acid Transporter 1 (LAT1), the main transporter of large neutral branched-chain amino acids, is overexpressed in malignancies to support the increased demand for bulk protein synthesis that underpins their enhanced cell proliferation and survival [10]. LAT1 inhibition has been validated in many studies to block amino acid intake resulting in tumor growth delay, indicating that LAT1 is a valid molecular target for cancer therapy [11,12]. This review summarizes the development of JPH203 (KYT-0353), the only LAT1-selective non-transportable blocker which currently passed a phase I clinical trial [13].

Targeted Drugs and Targeting Abnormal Metabolism of Cancer
Targeted drugs have passed multicenter clinical trials and been marketed in the last 20 years, with various drug classes (small molecules, peptides, proteins, antibodies) and also various molecular targets (generally cell signaling), ranging from angiogenesis (VEGF, VEGFR, αvβ3 integrin) and cell proliferation (EGFR, HER2) up to certain specific receptors (folic acid receptors, biotin D, LDL, CD20, etc.) [6,14]. However, their clinical application so far shows that achieving long-lasting therapeutic effects remains difficult due to subsequent drug resistance. Along with the increasing reports in cancer resistance against the cellsignaling-targeted drugs, roughly a decade ago, the targeted drug development led to immune checkpoint inhibitors (cancer immunotherapy) that engage the immune system to attack cancer cells [15]. Although initially promising, investigators began to report the rise of cancer resistance toward this new strategy [16]. When a particular signaling pathway is disrupted, cancer cells are capable of quickly adopting an escape mechanism by activating other pathways, thus developing resistance [17]. Therefore, an ideal molecular target not only should be highly cancer-specific (strictly available in cancer cells) but also have simultaneous catastrophic impacts toward several cancer hallmark pathways when disrupted.
The rapid proliferation of cancer cells demanding a high amount of energy and biomass material is depicted by the increased metabolic rate of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, hydroxybutyrate, acetate, glutamine, and fatty acids [8]. Blocking this metabolic upregulation seems rational as a therapeutic strategy. However, disrupting carbon metabolism (glucose and fatty acid metabolism) is a complicated task due to the interrelations between metabolic components. The dysregulation of the amino acid metabolism is another potential target. Apart from fulfilling high energy demands (via the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle), the primary role of the amino acid metabolism is to secure biomass material supplies required for rapid cancer cell growth (nucleotides, proteins, and lipids) [8,18,19].
Even though excessive glucose consumption is prominent in proliferating cells including cancer, amino acids rather than glucose are responsible for the majority of cell carbon mass [20]. Amino acids in highly proliferating cells are employed in versatile ways as scaffold molecules for producing biomass, as various proteins for signaling purposes, and for fueling energy; all are centered in anaplerotic reactions in the TCA cycle [10]. In the TCA cycle, amino acids are involved in energy production, redox balance, cell invasion and metastasis, apoptosis, and activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex. Branched-chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine, lysine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, and tyrosine) are among the main source of acetyl-CoA, the starting point of this cycle, as well as alanine, cysteine, glycine, serine, and threonine which are converted first into pyruvate. Glutamine, glutamate, leucine, aspartate, asparagine, methionine, and serine are among the top amino acids linked with cancers [10]. Leucine, in particular, is a quintessential amino acid not only as a building block but also responsible for activation of mTOR signaling resulting in cell death resistance and uncontrollable tumor growth [10,21]. Me-Processes 2021, 9,1170 3 of 15 thionine is the methyl donor for DNA methylation, thus contributing to cancer epigenetics, protein synthesis, and survival [10].
A precondition for such increased demand of amino acids is the over-expression of the membrane transporters responsible for amino acid uptake from the cells' environment across the cell membrane. At least 61 types of amino acid transporters are known to be involved in physiological and pathological processes, divided into eight systems (system A, N, ASC, B, L, T, x − c , and y + ) based on their transport mechanism and substrate specificity. However, only a few are involved in malignancy including AlaSerCys (alanine-serinecysteine) transporter 2 (ASCT2), LAT1, ATB 0,+ , and SNAT2 [19]. Both ASCT2 and LAT1 expression have been associated with several hallmarks of cancer, e.g., avoiding immune destruction, activating invasion and metastasis, inducing angiogenesis, resisting cell death, sustaining proliferative signaling, and dysregulating cellular energetics [12]. These unique features have been inspiring researchers to establish ASCT2 and LAT1 as novel targets for tumor-specific delivery of appropriately designed chemotherapeutic drugs [22]. However, since ASCT2 is also expressed in several normal adult organs and also in inflammation, currently LAT1 is the only amino acid transporter with true potential as a highly tumorspecific molecular target for therapy [19].

LAT1
LAT1 (SLC7A5) is a transmembrane protein member of the L system transporter subfamily (along with LAT2, LAT3, and LAT4) of the SLC7 family of amino acid transporters which transports large, neutral (or with branched) amino acids [19,21]. LAT1 forms heterodimers with the 4F2hc (SLC3A2) subunit as a LAT1/CD98 complex ( Figure 1). The 4F2hc subunit is not directly involved in the transport mechanism but provides stability for the complex at the cell membrane, essential for the LAT1 transport activity [11,21,23,24]. [10,21]. Methionine is the methyl donor for DNA methylation, thus contributing to cancer epigenetics, protein synthesis, and survival [10].
A precondition for such increased demand of amino acids is the over-expression of the membrane transporters responsible for amino acid uptake from the cells' environment across the cell membrane. At least 61 types of amino acid transporters are known to be involved in physiological and pathological processes, divided into eight systems (system A, N, ASC, B, L, T, x − c, and y + ) based on their transport mechanism and substrate specificity. However, only a few are involved in malignancy including AlaSerCys (alanine-serinecysteine) transporter 2 (ASCT2), LAT1, ATB 0,+ , and SNAT2 [19]. Both ASCT2 and LAT1 expression have been associated with several hallmarks of cancer, e.g., avoiding immune destruction, activating invasion and metastasis, inducing angiogenesis, resisting cell death, sustaining proliferative signaling, and dysregulating cellular energetics [12]. These unique features have been inspiring researchers to establish ASCT2 and LAT1 as novel targets for tumor-specific delivery of appropriately designed chemotherapeutic drugs [22]. However, since ASCT2 is also expressed in several normal adult organs and also in inflammation, currently LAT1 is the only amino acid transporter with true potential as a highly tumor-specific molecular target for therapy [19].

LAT1
LAT1 (SLC7A5) is a transmembrane protein member of the L system transporter subfamily (along with LAT2, LAT3, and LAT4) of the SLC7 family of amino acid transporters which transports large, neutral (or with branched) amino acids [19,21]. LAT1 forms heterodimers with the 4F2hc (SLC3A2) subunit as a LAT1/CD98 complex ( Figure 1). The 4F2hc subunit is not directly involved in the transport mechanism but provides stability for the complex at the cell membrane, essential for the LAT1 transport activity [11,21,23,24].
More than a hundred LAT1 inhibitors have been reported, and most of them are amino acid derivatives. However, only a few of these blockers are potent and selective, including JPH203, a tyrosine/T3-derived amino acid developed by a group of researchers in Japan [23]. In 2002, the basic concept of LAT1 targeting was described, including small aromatic amino acids requiring free carboxyl groups and amine groups [41]. Since then, various selective LAT1 compounds have been synthesized.
More than a hundred LAT1 inhibitors have been reported, and most of them are amino acid derivatives. However, only a few of these blockers are potent and selective, including JPH203, a tyrosine/T3-derived amino acid developed by a group of researchers in Japan [23]. In 2002, the basic concept of LAT1 targeting was described, including small aromatic amino acids requiring free carboxyl groups and amine groups [41]. Since then, various selective LAT1 compounds have been synthesized.

JPH203
In   The structure of JPH203, T3, T4, and phenylalanine. The same group is marked in blue. The JPH203 framework consists of three basic parts [43]. Blue box: The structure-activity relationship (SAR) from the L-phenylalanine. The positions of the two α-amine and α-carboxyl (red circle) groups are held sterically. The position of the aliphatic portion of the side chain marked α and β (gray circle) is tolerating modifications. The aromatic rings of the side chains are marked with a purple circle and their positions include ortho (0, R1, and R1'), meta (m, R2, and R2'), and para (p, R3). All positions in the aromatic chain can tolerate modification and steric mass, but meta positions are important for affinity [44].
JPH203 was designed based on inhibition of 14 C-phenylalanine influx and efflux (e.g., melphalan, T3, and T4), the only known characteristics of LAT1 inhibitors and substrates. At that time (in the early 2000s), in vitro data suggested that to be an active LAT1 substrate/ligand, a compound should have a free amino acid moiety (aminopropanoic group) and a hydrophobic side chain (blue structure in Figure 2) [45]. Not surprisingly, "2-Amino-3-phenylpropanoic acid" (L-phenylalanine) was widely used as a prototype ligand to evaluate LAT1 transport activity. Structure-Activity relationships (SAR) of phenylalaninebased LAT1 ligands showed that if affinity is to be retained, modifications can only be made on the aromatic ring (R 1-3 ) [44]. For that reason, the JPH203 synthesis route (Figure 3) shows an attempt to keep the aminopropanoic group intact [42]. In brief, JPH203 is obtained from the conjugation of compound 10 and compound 13. Compound 10, the bulk side chain of the final structure, is synthesized from a commercially available 3-nitro salicylic acid with a series of protection and deprotection reactions. Compound 13, the primary aromatic ring in the final structure, is obtained by chlorination of a commercially available methyl tyrosinate (compound 11) followed by Boc protection of the amine group. Following the conjugation step, the JPH203 is obtained after reducing the nitro group and removing Boc and the methyl protecting group.
In 2002, an experimental and semiempirical computational analysis proposed a model for the substrate-binding site of LAT1 and showed that to be a LAT1 substrate, a small aromatic amino acid must have: (1) a free carboxyl group, (2) an amino group with a nitrogen charge of~−0.27, and (3) carbonyl oxygen close to the amino group with a charge of −0.55~−0.56 which does not participate in hydrogen bonding. A LAT1 substrate will be a selective non-transportable LAT1 inhibitor if Connolly accessible areas are large enough (>500 Å 2 ) and/or it has a ClogP >2.0. This study also revealed that the hydrophobic interaction between the substrate side chain and the substrate-binding site of LAT1 is crucial for substrate binding. All of these requirements were fulfilled by T3 [45]. A recent study showed that halogen substituents (Cl or I) on the meta position of the aromatic ring as seen on T3 and T4 is important for binding affinity as they may modulate lipophilicity and participate in polar interactions [44].
Further efforts to search compounds better than JPH203 were based on LAT1 ligand/substrate SAR studies, in many cases using T3, a selective non-transportable LAT1 blocker, as the main structure and later optimized for selectivity and affinity [11,19]. Kongpracha et al. have tried to modify the intramolecular distance and angle to explore the other possibility of novel LAT1 blockers based on the T3 structure yielded in SKN series compounds. However, they found that the development of JPH203 might be already on the right track since the SKN series could not demonstrate any better affinity to LAT1 than JPH203. They conclude that the JPH203 hydrophobic side chains (methoxyphenyl and benzo oxazole) played an important role in the affinity toward the LAT1 binding site but with different molecular configurations from T3 ( Figure 2) [43].  [42]. Figure 3. JPH203 synthesis pathway shows protection in aminopropanoic groups [42]. small as ~5 Å away from the α-carbon may affect substrate/inhibitor properties (Figure 4, C), (6) LAT1 may tolerate minor modifications such as -NHCOMe, -NHMe, -NMe2, -F, or -CF even though -NH2 is more preferred, and change in this part may have profound changes in inhibitory potency (Figure 4, E); (7) the nitrogen atom is important (Figure 4, F); and (8) the phenyl ring (Figure 4, G) should not be electronically distorted with a hydrogen-bonding group (inhibitory potency and/or LAT1:LAT2 selectivity may significantly change) [46].   [46]. Legends: Regions: A. amino acid moiety; B. α-carbon, C. aromatic ring with halogen substituents (green balls) on meta positions; C. and D. "substrate-inhibitor interface"; E. amine group on benzoxazole ring; F. nitrogen atom of benzoxazole ring; and G. phenyl ring. Atoms: grey (carbon), white (hydrogen), red (oxygen), blue (nitrogen), and green (halogen, as Cl or I).
The LAT1-inhibition mechanism of JPH203 has been previously studied computationally, and it was found that JPH203 has a more potent inhibitory effect than any large, neutral amino acids, L-DOPA, or BCH. However, due to its low solubility (highly hydrophobic), the details of the inhibiting mechanism could not be further investigated through cryo-electron microscopy [24]. In vivo studies show, after intravenous administration, that JPH203 is trapped by organic anion transporters into the liver cells and acetylated by the N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) enzyme into N-acetyl-JPH203 (Nac-JPH203) before finally being passively excreted through the bile [41].
Although the detailed LAT1-inhibition mechanism remains unknown, in vitro and in vivo cancer studies on JPH203 continued. In 2010, Endou et al. published their first in vitro and in vivo proofs that JPH203 competitively inhibits 14 C-leucine uptake (IC 50 0.06 µM), inhibits HT-29 colorectal cancer cell proliferation (IC 50 4.1 µM), and inhibits tumor growth in colorectal cancer models (IC 50 16.4 µM) in nude mice xenografts [47]. Since then, JPH203 has been challenged against various types of cancer cells and implanted tumors on animal models.
In a recent study, LAT1 inhibition by JPH203 was reported to result in a global protein expression and phosphorylation which have a broad impact not only on the common biological pathways and signaling cascades but also several key pathways inducing the growth arrests. These proteomic and phosphoproteomic findings support the hypothesis that selective and efficient LAT1 inhibition would damage several cancer hallmarks simultaneously [48].
A structure-based study that combines homology modeling (based on the atomic structures of the prokaryotic homologs) with other computational methods has been able to screen~1.1 million molecules virtually to search potent LAT1 inhibitors in absence of an experimental 3D structure of LAT1. Two of the retrieved compounds (compound 36 and 42; both showed conserved polar interactions of the α-amino and α-carboxyl group)  [49]. However, since no further in vitro nor in vivo studies have been performed to validate these two compounds, JPH203 remains the most advanced LAT1 inhibitor currently available.

In Vitro and In Vivo JPH203 Studies
LAT1 is expressed in all cancer types; thus, no particular type of cancer is more important than others (regarding LAT1 expression) to be selected for evaluation of JPH203 inhibitory efficacy in preclinical studies. The methods of in vitro JPH203 studies are generally following these stages:
LAT1 and 4F2hc/CD98 protein subunit expression analysis using immunohistochemistry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) or quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and confirmed by a Western blot study; 3.
Cell growth inhibition study.
In in vivo studies, JPH203 was the main drug for therapeutic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic evaluation in tumor xenograft small animal models. In the following passages, in vitro and in vivo studies involving JPH203 are described based on cancer types (Tables 1 and 2).

Oral Cancer
JPH203 was tested to inhibit the growth of YD-38, a human oral cancer cell line expressing LAT1, but not LAT2. JPH203 competitively inhibited the L-leucine uptake by YD-38 cells while inhibiting its growth. JPH203 is also controlling the YD-38 cell population via activation of apoptotic factors, including caspase and PARP. This study shows that the LAT1-inhibition by JPH203 on YD-38 cells induces apoptosis by suppressing the intracellular neutral amino acids level that is essential for growth [50].   Colorectal [47] HT-29 cell xenograft -Inhibit 14 C-leucine absorption and cell growth (IC 50 0.14 µM and 16.4 µM).

Gastric and Colorectal Cancer
LAT1 was overexpressed on all stomach and colorectal cancer cell lines tested, and JPH203 significantly suppressed the growth of these cells. In a previous study (2010) on HT-29 colorectal cancer cells, JPH203 was able to inhibit the uptake of 14 C-leucine and the growth of cancer cells with IC 50 0.06 µM and 4.1 µM, respectively [47]. In this study, JPH203 suppressed the growth of the LoVo colorectal cancer cell line with IC 50

Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer
A new therapeutic approach for anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) cases is highly anticipated due to its progressive nature and resistance against 131 I radionuclide therapy, unlike well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Human ATC expresses LAT1 in the majority of cases (78%: 11/14 cases). It was recently reported that ATC expresses the MYC protein and MYC inhibition by its selective inhibitor, JQ1, suppressing ATC growth and increasing survival in preclinical models. Since the MYC gene is involved in LAT1 overexpression, direct inhibition of LAT1 would achieve a similar anti-tumor effect. In this study, JPH203 significantly inhibits the proliferation of three types of ATC cells (8505C, OCUT-2, and OCUT-6) via suppression of mTOR signaling and inhibits the cell cycle from the G0/G1 phase to the S phase. Growth decline and shrinking tumor size by JPH203 through inhibition of mTOR and G0/G1 cell cycle-related proteins are also confirmed in animal tumor models. These preclinical findings indicate that JPH203 is a strong candidate for ATC therapy given that the current therapeutic choice for ATC is very limited. More importantly, it was shown from an in vitro and animal study that JPH203 also has therapeutic potential for papillary thyroid carcinoma, the most common thyroid cancer [51].

Osteosarcoma
The JPH203 effects on bone cancer have been investigated on LAT1 and LAT2expressing osteoblastic FOB cells and Saos2 human osteosarcoma. JPH203 inhibited Lleucine uptake by Saos2 cells and induced apoptosis. This study showed that JPH203 activated mitochondrial-dependent apoptotic signaling via increased pro-apoptotic factors, such as Bad, Bax, and Bak, and the active form of caspase-9, and decreased anti-apoptotic factors, such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL. These results indicated that the LAT1 inhibition by JPH203induced apoptosis was obtained through the mediation of mitochondrial-dependent intrinsic apoptotic signaling by reducing intracellular neutral amino acid supplies that are essential for growth [55].

Medulloblastoma
Medulloblastoma is classified into four genetic and clinically relevant subtypes: Wnt, Shh, subgroup 3, and subgroup 4. JPH203 activity was investigated on cell lines representing two subtypes; HD-MB03 (for subgroup 3) and DAOY (for Shh). The results show that JPH203 interferes with amino acid homeostasis and mTOR complex activity in medulloblastoma cells, thus inhibiting proliferation and suppressing its growth. More importantly, it was observed that JPH203 toxicity toward normal brain cells was low, and long-term JPH203 therapy on medulloblastoma cells did not trigger resistance [53].

Renal Cell Carcinoma
Immunohistochemical studies show that LAT1 is expressed in the majority (92%) of renal cancer tissue examined. Therapeutic studies on the Caki-1 cells and ACHN (kidney cell carcinoma derivatives) showed that JPH203 inhibits growth in a dose-dependent fashion. Moreover, JPH203 significantly suppresses the migration and invasion of renal cell carcinoma. Clinical observation in this study indicates that LAT1 does not only have great potential as a prognostic biomarker of renal cell carcinoma but also as a target of clinical therapy [27].

Bladder Carcinoma
LAT1 expression was significantly higher in bladder cancer cells compared with normal cells (p = 0.0051). LAT1 inhibition by JPH203 was observed in two bladder cancer cell lines with the highest and the second-highest LAT1 expression, namely T24 and 5637 cells. In this study, it was also observed that insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 5 (IGFBP-5) is a downstream target of LAT1 inhibition by JPH203. Phase II clinical trials are currently being prepared in urological cancer (including bladder cancer) based on these findings [57].

Biliary Duct Cancer
Both in vitro and in vivo JPH203 investigations in cholangiocarcinoma cells showed that JPH203 suppressed its growth and its 14 C-leucine uptake. Besides, JPH203 also induced termination of the G2/M and G0/G1 cell cycles and shortened the S phase with changes in expression of cell cycle progression proteins (cyclin D1, CDK4, and CDK6). In a mouse xenograft tumor model of the KKU-213 cholangiocarcinoma cell, daily intravenous administration of JPH203 (12.5 and 25 mg/kg doses) significantly inhibits tumor growth in a dose-dependent manner, without significant body weight changes and any histological differences and appearance of internal organs compared to the control group. This study shows that the inhibition of LAT1 by JPH203 may become a potential therapeutic strategy for cholangiocarcinoma [56,58].
In , bile ducts (n = 5), pancreas (n = 4), esophagus (n = 1), and breast (n = 1). A promising efficacy was observed on bile duct cancer patients (2 patients; 1 stable disease, 1 partial response), despite the limited number of patients. All patients received intravenous JPH203 infusion for 90 min every day for seven days, which was then followed by a 21-day rest period. The JPH203 infusion solution contains JPH203 in a sulfobutyl-etherβ-cyclodextrin complex to increase solubility. The escalating dose plan was 12 mg/m 2 , 25 mg/m 2 , 40 mg/m 2 , 60 mg/m 2 , and 85 mg/m 2 . Initial doses were determined from toxicology studies in animals (mice) which showed no significant side effects at a 2 mg/kg dose (equivalent to a 12 mg/m 2 human dose) [13].
JPH203 was well tolerated with a sufficient safety margin between the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 60 mg/m 2 . Despite the MTD being set at 60 mg/m 2 , the pharmacokinetic profile does not support the recommended dosage for phase II (RP2D) at doses >25 mg/m 2 . The most severe side effect observed was a third-degree hepatic injury in the form of elevated levels of ALT, AST, or γ-GTP, starting at 40 mg/m 2 dose. Thus, a 25 mg/m 2 dose is recommended as RP2D, with the presumption that a high dose JPH203 administration has a negative feedback on the LAT1 pathway [56,58].
Since JPH203 is metabolized to Nac-JPH203, its plasma concentration should depend on liver enzyme activity. Depending on NAT2 expression, three acetylator phenotypes do exist: rapid, intermediate, and slow. In patients with a rapid NAT2 phenotype, the ratio of Nac-JPH203 is higher, indicating that Nac-JPH203 is formed more quickly. In an Okano et al. study, severe adverse effects of liver function occurred in the rapid NAT2 phenotype patients [13]. Therefore, a thorough evaluation in this regard is important to minimize the risk of liver damage in subsequent studies. A placebo-controlled, phase II randomized clinical trial of JPH203 in bile duct cancer patients is currently being prepared.

Insights for Radiotheranostic Purpose
Considering several points from the recent findings above, e.g., (1) LAT1 inhibitionderived JPH203 therapeutic efficacies in a wide range of cancer types, (2) lack of LAT1 distribution in normal tissues and other pathologies (in particular, inflammations), and (3) well-tolerated clinical safety profile, it might be safe to speculate that JPH203 can be a model of an efficient and safe pan-cancer targeted drug design. Given the strictly localized LAT1 expression on tumors, LAT1 expression on the cancer cell membrane, and the recent insights on the LAT1 inhibition process, JPH203 might also have the potential to be further elaborated as radiotheranostic agents. Since a radiotheranostic approach counts heavily on radionuclide irradiation strength, only a trace mass of JPH203 would be required as vehicles to deliver this radiation straight into tumors [62]. In such a strategy, hepatotoxicity potential would be irrelevant. Modifications with bifunctional chelators (to allow labeling with radiotheranostic pairs of radiometals) might be safely made on position E ( Figure 4); however, comprehensive molecular docking studies and synthetic experiments are required to ensure its inhibitory potency and validate such design.

Conclusions
JPH203 is the most potent LAT1-selective non-transportable inhibitor available today and has demonstrated an excellent IC 50

Data Availability Statement:
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.