Impedimetric Microcystin-LR Aptasensor Prepared with Sulfonated Poly(2,5-dimethoxyaniline)–Silver Nanocomposite

: This paper presents a novel impedimetric aptasensor for cyanobacterial microcystin-LR (L, L -leucine; R, L -arginine) (MC-LR) containing a 5 (cid:48) thiolated 60-mer DNA aptamer (i.e., 5 (cid:48) -SH-(CH 2 ) 6 GGCGCCAAACAGGACCACCATGACAATTACCCATACCACCTCATTATGCCCCATCT CCGC-3 (cid:48) ). A nanocomposite electrode platform comprising biocompatible poly(2,5-dimethoxyaniline) (PDMA)-poly(vinylsulfonate) (PVS) and silver nanoparticle (Ag 0 ) on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE), i.e., (GCE/PDMA–PVS–Ag 0 ) was used in the biosensor development. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) spectroscopic analysis revealed that the PDMA–PVS–Ag 0 nanocomposites were polydispersed and contained embedded Ag 0 . Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) responses of the aptasensor gave a dynamic linear range (DLR) and limit of detection (LOD) values of 0.01–0.1 ng L − 1 MC-LR and 0.003 ng L − 1 MC-LR, respectively. The cross-reactivity studies, which was validated with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), showed that the aptasensor possesses excellent selectivity for MC-LR. doped (Ag a (GCE). responses of aptasensor as Bode plots of the impedance (EIS) data determine phase shifts (i.e., changes in the phase caused by MC-LR. MC-LR aptasensor’s preparation and Bode phase plot responses are schematically in Scheme 1.


Introduction
Recently, novel nanocomposite materials with noble metal nanoparticles attached within a polymer matrix are being applied in biosensor development [1][2][3]. These hybrid nanocomposites containing embedded metal nanoparticles have large surface areas that enable the attachment of biological receptors, such as aptamers and enzymes, onto an electrode surface, which results in increased sensitivity [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Polyaniline (PANI) is a fascinating π conjugated conducting polymer with good environmental stability and ease of preparation. Its reversible doping chemistry is responsible for its being widely used in electrochromic devices, electrochemical capacitors, biosensors and chemical sensors [10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, the poor solubility of unmodified PANI in aqueous media limited its application in electrochemical biosensors [16]. The introduction of mono-alkyl or alkoxy substituents at the ortho position of the phenyl ring of the PANI molecule easily increases its solubility but reduces its conductivity. The introduction of 2,5-dialkoxy group onto the phenyl rings solves the problem of poor aqueous solubility while retaining the conductivity of PANI [17]. Masikini and co-workers reported that 2,5-dimethoxyaniline (DMA) produces soluble electrosynthetic poly(2,5-dimethoxyaniline) (PDMA), with a conductivity similar to that of polyaniline [1,18,19]. They demonstrated the application of an electrosynthetic PDMAmulti-walled carbon nanotube composite material in the development of highly impedimetric immunosensors for fumonisin B 1 [20]. Microcystin-LR (L, L-leucine; R, L-arginine) (MC-LR) is considered the most potent cyanobacterial toxin and the most common variant among other microcystin congeners. MC-LR is carcinogenic and is widespread in aquatic

Electrochemical Experiments
A three-electrode cell, with GCE (3 mm diameter), platinum wire and silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) (3 M NaCl type) as working, auxiliary and reference electrodes, respectively, was used for all the electrochemical measurements. Voltammetric experiments were performed on a BAS100W electrochemical workstation (Bioanalytical Systems Incorporated, BASi, West Lafayette, IN, USA). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data were obtained with a ZAHNER IM6ex electrochemical workstation (ZAHNER-elektrik GmbH & Co., Kronach, Germany) at room temperature, 10 mV perturbation amplitude and frequency range of 100 kHz-100 MHz. Bode analysis of the EIS data was performed with ZView ® software from Scribner Associates Incorporated (Southern Pines, NC, USA). All electrochemical experiments were conducted under an inert atmosphere obtained by degassing the cell with argon for approximately 10 min.

FTIR Spectroscopy
The characteristic features of the prepared materials were evaluated using a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR) (PerkinElmer Spectrum 100, PerkinElmer Incorporated, Shelton, CT, USA). A Nicolet Evolution 100 UV-visible spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for all UV-vis absorption measurements of samples in quartz cuvettes.

Electron Microscopy
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were captured using a scanning electron microscope (JEOL-JSM 7500F). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the nanocomposite were obtained using a Tecnai G 2 F20X-Twin MAT 200KV high resolution (HRTEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) detector manufactured by Field Electron and Ion Company (FEI) Europe, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) Spectroscopy
Pore morphology, particle size distribution and architecture within the nanocomposites were determined by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements, using an Anton Paar-SAXSpace instrument from Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria. The SAXS measurements were obtained using a line-collimation mode with an accessible q range value of 0.0732-1.66 nm, placed in a 1 mm diameter quartz capillary tube and positioned at a distance of 317 mm from the charge-coupled device (CCD) detector at a temperature of 20 • C. For each measurement, six frames were acquired at 100 s exposure time and averaged. In addition, deionized water was used as a reference under the same conditions as the nanocomposites. Data analysis was performed with the generalized indirect Fourier transformation (GIFT) software.

Atomic Force Microscopy
The surface topography and morphology of the deposited layers were analyzed with EasyScan atomic force microscope (AFM) manufactured by Nanosurf AG, Liestal, Switzerland). The silicon tip (n-type antimony-doped) of the AFM had a curvature radius of 2.5-3.5 m, a force constant of 1-5 N m −1 and a resonance frequency of 60-100 kHz. The samples for the AFM experiments were prepared by drop-coating the nanocomposite/water (5 µL) dispersion on a silicon wafer.

Electrodeposition of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0
A bare GCE was polished to a mirror finish with 1.0, 0.3, and 0.05 µm alumina slurries, respectively, and then rinsed thoroughly with distilled water, followed by sonication in ethanol and water. The clean GCE was placed in a solution containing 1.0 M HCl, 100 mM DMA, 3 mM AgNO 3 and 50 mM PVS. The solution was degassed with argon for about 10 min, and then a 15-cycle CV was performed at a potential window of −800 to +400 mV (vs. Ag|AgCl) and a scan rate of 40 mV s −1 to form GCE|PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite electrode. The electroactivity of the PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite material was studied at different scan rates (5-50 mV s −1 ) and a potential range of −800 to +400 mV in 1 M HCl and PBS solutions. EIS spectra were recorded with a Zahner IM6ex electrochemical workstation at a frequency range of 100 kHz to 100 MHz, an amplitude of 10 mV and a potential of 200 mV in PBS solution, pH 7.4. The Bode phase plots of the EIS data for GCE, GCE|PDMA, GCE|PDMA-PVS and GCE|PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 were fitted to an equivalent circuit using ZView ® software.

Results and Discussion
3.1. In Situ Electro-Deposition of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 Nanocomposite 2,5-dimethoxyaniline was electro-polymerized on GCE by performing 15-cycle cyclic voltammetry (from −800 to +400 mV at a scan rate of 40 mV s −1 ) in a cell solution containing PVS and AgNO 3 . Poly(2,5-dimethoxyaniline)-poly(vinylsulfonic acid) copolymer was formed with concomitant nucleation of Ag and the intercalation of Ag 0 nanoparticles within the copolymer to form PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite. Successful copolymerization was indicated by the formation of a dark-green film on the GCE surface. As the polymerization process progressed, the peak current increased with the number of successive potential cycles, indicating that conductive copolymer layers were being deposited on the electrode surface. In Figure 1A, the voltammograms exhibit three redox peaks (a/a', b/b' and c/c'), whereas in Figure 1B the voltammograms exhibit redox peaks (a/a', b/b' and c/c') and an additional cathodic peak (d), which are typical for the electrosynthesis of PDMA-PVS and Ag 0 , respectively [8,64]. The a/a', b/b' and c/c' redox states of PDMA-PVS represent the leucomeraldine, emeraldine and pernigraniline forms of the copolymer. The two redox peaks at~−100 mV/100 mV (a/a') and~−500 mV (c/c') indicate the conversion of the leucoemeraldine base to emeraldine salt and emeraldine salt to pernigraniline salt, respectively [65]. These redox peaks provide evidence for the presence of discrete electroactive regions in both the doped PDMA-PVS and PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 composites. The origin of another pair of redox peaks observed at −400 mV (b/b ) for both PDMA-PVS and PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 is attributed to different intermediates and degradation products, including benzoquinone, emeraldine and emeraldine radical cation [66]. In Figure 1B, the cathodic peak d at −90 mV is for the reduction of Ag + to Ag 0 used in the formation of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 on the GCE surface. The reduction of Ag + ions at −90 mV (d) during the reduction scan maintains charge neutrality in the polymer. During the reverse scan (i.e., anodic scan), the polymer was oxidized, followed by the insertion of Ag 0 nanoparticles into PDMA-PVS composite, with several of the benzenoid units being converted to quinoid units in the process. It should be noted that electrosynthesis permits the precise control of the oxidation of PDMA and the uptake and reduction of AgNO 3 , in contrast to chemical synthesis where solution conditions alone determine the degree of Ag incorporation and the state of oxidation of the product [66].

In Situ Electro-Deposition of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 Nanocomposite
2,5-dimethoxyaniline was electro-polymerized on GCE by performing 15-cycle cyclic voltammetry (from −800 to +400 mV at a scan rate of 40 mV s −1 ) in a cell solution containing PVS and AgNO3. Poly(2,5-dimethoxyaniline)-poly(vinylsulfonic acid) copolymer was formed with concomitant nucleation of Ag and the intercalation of Ag 0 nanoparticles within the copolymer to form PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite. Successful copolymerization was indicated by the formation of a dark-green film on the GCE surface. As the polymerization process progressed, the peak current increased with the number of successive potential cycles, indicating that conductive copolymer layers were being deposited on the electrode surface. In Figure 1A, the voltammograms exhibit three redox peaks (a/a', b/b' and c/c'), whereas in Figure 1B the voltammograms exhibit redox peaks (a/a', b/b' and c/c') and an additional cathodic peak (d), which are typical for the electrosynthesis of PDMA-PVS and Ag 0 , respectively [8,64]. The a/a', b/b' and c/c' redox states of PDMA-PVS represent the leucomeraldine, emeraldine and pernigraniline forms of the copolymer. The two redox peaks at ∼−100 mV/100 mV (a/a') and ∼−500 mV (c/c') indicate the conversion of the leucoemeraldine base to emeraldine salt and emeraldine salt to pernigraniline salt, respectively [65]. These redox peaks provide evidence for the presence of discrete electroactive regions in both the doped PDMA-PVS and PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 composites. The origin of another pair of redox peaks observed at −400 mV (b/b′) for both PDMA-PVS and PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 is attributed to different intermediates and degradation products, including benzoquinone, emeraldine and emeraldine radical cation [66]. In Figure 1B, the cathodic peak d at −90 mV is for the reduction of Ag + to Ag 0 used in the formation of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 on the GCE surface. The reduction of Ag + ions at −90 mV (d) during the reduction scan maintains charge neutrality in the polymer. During the reverse scan (i.e., anodic scan), the polymer was oxidized, followed by the insertion of Ag 0 nanoparticles into PDMA-PVS composite, with several of the benzenoid units being converted to quinoid units in the process. It should be noted that electrosynthesis permits the precise control of the oxidation of PDMA and the uptake and reduction of AgNO3, in contrast to chemical synthesis where solution conditions alone determine the degree of Ag incorporation and the state of oxidation of the product [66].

UV-vis Spectra of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 Nanocomposite
PDMA, PDMA-PVS and PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 exhibit ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectrophotometric features similar to those of polyaniline and its derivatives, indicating successful immobilization of the polymer on the electrode surface [66,67]. Figure 2 shows the UV-vis spectra of undoped PDMA, doped PDMA-PVS and PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 , where the absorption bands appear at different wavelengths and different intensities. The UV-vis spectra of the PDMA-PVS (red) and PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 (green) composites display three absorbance bands characteristic of fully reduce emeraldine salt: the band at ca. 330 nm and two bands in the visible region at ca. 430 and 800 nm are assigned to the π-π* transition of benzoic and quinoid rings, n-π* transition which is due to polarons and n−π transition from excitons and the doping level [17]. The undoped PDMA film exhibited two characteristic bands at 330 and 430 nm, which are associated with the π-π transition of the C=C bonds within the benzenoid structure and exciton formation in the quinoid rings of emeraldine base. There was a marginal shift in the positions of the bands corresponding to the π-π* and polaronic transitions in the spectra collected during the electropolymerization of DMA by the addition of PVS and Ag + ions. The shift is associated with the incorporation of the dopants to PDMA which decreases the energy level of the π-orbital, change the benzenoid to quinoid ratio and eventually shortened its conjugation length. The maximum wavelength (λ max ) for the π-π* transition was blue-shifted from 330 to 316 nm. There was a prominent band (green line) at 430 nm (shifted from 480 nm), representing the polaronic band of PDMA when silver nanoparticles were formed in concert with PDMA upon partial oxidation. These shifts in the positions of the π-π* and polaronic transitions were attributed to the oxidative mechanism in the benzenoid structure of PDMA, while the changes in the intermolecular interactions between PDMA and PVS in the presence of Ag 0 attributed to the n-π* polaronic transitions. We assume that some of the phenylamine units of PDMA are converted into quinone imine units with consequent reduction of Ag + ions to Ag 0 . In general, phenylamine units donate their π-electrons from the occupied 2p orbitals to empty s orbitals of Ag + ions to form σ-bonds. Then, the influence of back-donation of electron density from occupied d orbitals of Ag + ions into the empty π*-2p antibonding orbitals of phenylamine molecules leads to the formation of π-bonds when the phenylamine units are converted into quinone, and Ag + ions are subsequently reduced to Ag 0 particles that are incorporated into the growing polymer matrix. Hence, the broad band at 430 nm overshadowed the Ag 0 band that usually appears at ca. 420 nm on spectra relating to PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 . The appearance of the quinoid π-π transition band at ca. 630 nm in the spectra for doped PDMA-PVS and PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 is indicative of complete doping of PDMA during electropolymerization by the sulfonic acid groups of PVS [17]. Because sulfonic acid groups are present in the polymeric backbone of PVS, we envisage the formation of interconnected network units of PDMA and PVS through intermolecular interactions between the sulfonate groups and the protonated amine nitrogen atoms in PDMA. The presence of electron-donating (two methoxy) groups on the phenyl rings within the DMA monomer further facilitates the binding of amine nitrogen atoms and sulfonic acid groups in PVS. The band at~490 (red line) is normally associated with self-doping in sulfonated PANIs, while the broad band from 630 to 800 nm corresponds to the delocalization of protons in the emeraldine salt state of PDMA [68].

FTIR spectroscopy of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 Nanocomposite
The FTIR spectra of the polymeric materials synthesized are presented in Figure 3 for PDMA (A), PDMA-PVS (B) and PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 (C). Each spectrum shows a typical quinoid peak at 1588 cm −1 and a benzenoid peak at 1492 cm −1 . Bands around 2920 and 2850 cm −1 were attributed to C-H stretching vibrations, and the band at 1139 cm −1 was assigned to in-plane C-H bending vibrations in the quinoid rings of the doped PDMA. The broad band in the region around 3400 cm −1 corresponds to N-H bond stretching. The absorption bands corroborate the emeraldine salt form of PDMA in the three samples. The C-NH-C bond stretching that is common to all the PDMA is evidenced by the presence of the prominent band at 1170 cm −1 and the minor one 1050 cm −1 . The double bond character of C=N stretching vibration in PDMA is represented at 1663 cm −1 for PDMA and its composites. The FTIR results indicate that the vibrational modes of PDMA are not altered in PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposites [69].

FTIR Spectroscopy of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 Nanocomposite
The FTIR spectra of the polymeric materials synthesized are presented in

FTIR spectroscopy of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 Nanocomposite
The FTIR spectra of the polymeric materials synthesized are presented in Figure 3 for

Electrochemical Characterization of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 Nanocomposite
The voltammograms of the PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite plotted in Figure 4 displayed three redox peaks (a/a for the leucoemeraldine radical cation/leucoemeraldine pair; b/b for the emeraldine/emeraldine radical cation pair; and c/c for the pernigraniline/pernigraniline radical cation couple) and a cathodic peak d (at -90 mV) for Ag + to Ag 0 . The peak currents of all the redox systems increased as the scan rate increased, and the peak potential of at least one peak (in this case, the cathodic peak b at −425 mV) remained constant at all scan rates. These properties confirm the presence of an electrodeposited film of electroactive material (in this case, PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite) on the GCE surface. The peak potential value of anodic peak c changed from −520 mV at 5 mV s −1 to −440 mV at 50 mV s −1 . This anodic shift in the peak potential of peak c with an increase in scan rate is reminiscent of electron delocalization (i.e., electron propagation or electron diffusion) along the polymer chain of the electroactive PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite material [66]. The Randles-Sevčik analysis of the peak currents of the PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 voltammograms was used to calculate the charge transfer coefficient, D, for charge propagation along the composite copolymer chain using Equation (1): where i p is the peak current, n is the number of electrons, F is the Faraday constant, A is the surface area of the working electrode, C is the bulk concentration of the electroactive species, ν is the potential scan rate, R is the gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature. The D value obtained for PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 is 7.508 × 10 −9 cm 2 s −1 , which is much higher than the values reported in the literature [20] for PDMA, and thus suggests higher conductivity of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 compared to pristine PDMA. The surface concentration (Γ*) of the electrodeposited PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 film on GCE was calculated to be 4.14 × 10 −4 mol cm −2 using the Brown-Anson relation [70,71]: where all the parameters are as defined in Equation (1).

Electrochemical Characterization of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 Nanocomposite
The voltammograms of the PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite plotted in Figure 4 displayed three redox peaks (a/a′ for the leucoemeraldine radical cation/leucoemeraldine pair; b/b′ for the emeraldine/emeraldine radical cation pair; and c/c′ for the pernigraniline/pernigraniline radical cation couple) and a cathodic peak d (at -90 mV) for Ag + to Ag 0 . The peak currents of all the redox systems increased as the scan rate increased, and the peak potential of at least one peak (in this case, the cathodic peak b at −425 mV) remained constant at all scan rates. These properties confirm the presence of an electrodeposited film of electroactive material (in this case, PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite) on the GCE surface. The peak potential value of anodic peak c′ changed from −520 mV at 5 mV s −1 to −440 mV at 50 mV s −1 . This anodic shift in the peak potential of peak c′ with an increase in scan rate is reminiscent of electron delocalization (i.e., electron propagation or electron diffusion) along the polymer chain of the electroactive PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite material [66]. The Randles-Sevčik analysis of the peak currents of the PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 voltammograms was used to calculate the charge transfer coefficient, D, for charge propagation along the composite copolymer chain using Equation (1): where ip is the peak current, n is the number of electrons, F is the Faraday constant, A is the surface area of the working electrode, C is the bulk concentration of the electroactive species, ν is the potential scan rate, R is the gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature. The D value obtained for PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 is 7.508 × 10 −9 cm 2 s −1 , which is much higher than the values reported in the literature [20] for PDMA, and thus suggests higher conductivity of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 compared to pristine PDMA. The surface concentration (Г*) of the electrodeposited PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 film on GCE was calculated to be 4.14 × 10 −4 mol cm −2 using the Brown-Anson relation [70,71]: where all the parameters are as defined in Equation (1).

Morphology of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 Nanocomposite
The SEM images of PDMA, PDMA-PVS and PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite presented in Figure 5, show a change from a cauliflower-shaped polymer network in PDMA and PDMA-PVS to a more granular spherical aggregate of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 particles.

Morphology of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 Nanocomposite
The SEM images of PDMA, PDMA-PVS and PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite presented in Figure 5, show a change from a cauliflower-shaped polymer network in PDMA and PDMA-PVS to a more granular spherical aggregate of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 particles. The HRTEM images in Figure 6 display a change from a polymer network morphology for PDMA-PVS (in Figure 6A) to a polymer network with well-dispersed spherical nanostructures (i.e., the black spheres in the images) for PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite (see Figure 6B and 6C). The HRTEM of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0, thus, suggests the intercalation of Ag 0 in the copolymer. The AFM image in Figure 7A indicates that the PDMA-PVS copolymer network formed craters that have a wide range of sizes, indicating polydispersity in PDMA-PVS. On the other hand, the AFM image of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 in Figure 7B, contain conical islands instead of craters due to Ag 0 -doping. The PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 AFM exhibits less polydispersity than PDMA-PVS and has particles of predominantly smaller size. The HRTEM images in Figure 6 display a change from a polymer network morphology for PDMA-PVS (in Figure 6A) to a polymer network with well-dispersed spherical nanostructures (i.e., the black spheres in the images) for PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite (see Figure 6B,C). The HRTEM of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0, thus, suggests the intercalation of Ag 0 in the copolymer. The AFM image in Figure 7A indicates that the PDMA-PVS copolymer network formed craters that have a wide range of sizes, indicating polydispersity in PDMA-PVS. On the other hand, the AFM image of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 in Figure 7B, contain conical islands instead of craters due to Ag 0 -doping. The PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 AFM exhibits less polydispersity than PDMA-PVS and has particles of predominantly smaller size.

Morphology of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 Nanocomposite
The SEM images of PDMA, PDMA-PVS and PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite presented in Figure 5, show a change from a cauliflower-shaped polymer network in PDMA and PDMA-PVS to a more granular spherical aggregate of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 particles. The HRTEM images in Figure 6 display a change from a polymer network morphology for PDMA-PVS (in Figure 6A) to a polymer network with well-dispersed spherical nanostructures (i.e., the black spheres in the images) for PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite (see Figure 6B,C). The HRTEM of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0, thus, suggests the intercalation of Ag 0 in the copolymer. The AFM image in Figure 7A indicates that the PDMA-PVS copolymer network formed craters that have a wide range of sizes, indicating polydispersity in PDMA-PVS. On the other hand, the AFM image of PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 in Figure 7B, contain conical islands instead of craters due to Ag 0 -doping. The PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 AFM exhibits less polydispersity than PDMA-PVS and has particles of predominantly smaller size.   Figure 8A shows the SAXS pair-distance distribution function (PDDF) plots for PDMA, PDMA-PVS and PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite. The PDMA (black line) material exhibited a characteristic profile of spherically shaped particles, with a radius of 58 nm and a maximum diameter of 116 nm. In contrast to PDMA, the PDMA-PVS (red line) has maximum radii at 54 nm and 72 nm, which are attributed to the formation of copolymers involving PDMA and PVS. PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 formed a dumbbell-shaped PDDF spectrum (green line) (attributable to peripheral Ag 0 -doping), with maximal radii at 51 nm and 73.3 nm. Figure 8B refers to the number-weighted distribution function (D N ) SAXS plots. The three polymeric materials contain particles of radii 106-108 nm predominating in PDMA, indicating higher aggregation, compared to PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite that has particles predominantly with a radius of 11.5. The SAXS D N plots also show the formation of intermediate size PDMA (radius 58 nm) and PDMA-PVS (radius 54 nm) particles. This agrees with the principle of nanostructurization of the polymeric materials with metal ions or long-chain sulfonic acids.  Figure 8A shows the SAXS pair-distance distribution function (PDDF) plots for PDMA, PDMA-PVS and PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite. The PDMA (black line) material exhibited a characteristic profile of spherically shaped particles, with a radius of 58 nm and a maximum diameter of 116 nm. In contrast to PDMA, the PDMA-PVS (red line) has maximum radii at 54 nm and 72 nm, which are attributed to the formation of copolymers involving PDMA and PVS. PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 formed a dumbbell-shaped PDDF spectrum (green line) (attributable to peripheral Ag 0 -doping), with maximal radii at 51 nm and 73.3 nm. Figure 8B refers to the number-weighted distribution function (DN) SAXS plots. The three polymeric materials contain particles of radii 106-108 nm predominating in PDMA, indicating higher aggregation, compared to PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite that has particles predominantly with a radius of 11.5. The SAXS DN plots also show the formation of intermediate size PDMA (radius 58 nm) and PDMA-PVS (radius 54 nm) particles. This agrees with the principle of nanostructurization of the polymeric materials with metal ions or long-chain sulfonic acids.     Figure 9 is the equivalent circuit used to fit the EIS experimental data obtained with the various electrode system. The EIS Bode phase plots (-phase angle vs. log frequency) of the various GCE electrode systems are presented in Figure 10. Phase angle (-Φ) values of 78° (curve a), 65° (curve b), 68° (curve c), 21° (curve d) and 58° (curve e) were obtained for GCE, GCEPDMA-PVS, GCEPDMA-PVS-Ag 0 and GCEPDMA-PVS-Ag 0 SH-Apt, respectively, in 10 mM PBS (pH 7.4). All the electrodes exhibit semiconductor behavior since their -Φ values are <90° [72]. The change in -Φ value (from 21° to 58°) upon the binding of the ssDNA aptamer (SH-Apt) to GCEPDMA-PVS-Ag 0 (to form GCEPDMA-PVS-Ag 0 SH-Apt), indicates that the binding of the ssDNA aptamer increased the charge density and conductivity of the electrode.

Calibration of MC-LR Aptasensor
The interactions between the aptamer in the GCEPDMA-PVS-Ag 0 SH-Apt aptasensor and MC-LR were studied in the presence of 10 mM PBS (pH 7.4) by monitoring the shifts in -Φ. Figure 11A

Calibration of MC-LR Aptasensor
The interactions between the aptamer in the GCE|PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 |SH-Apt aptasensor and MC-LR were studied in the presence of 10 mM PBS (pH 7.4) by monitoring the shifts in -Φ. Figure 11A  Zhang et al. [73] reported a LOD value of 20 ng L −1 for an MC-LR immunosensor based on Au nanoparticles (AuNPs)@metal-organic framework (MIL-101) composite as a platform. Thus, the immunosensor's LOD value was by ∼4 orders of magnitudes higher than what was obtained for the MC-LR aptasensor developed in this current work. Liu et al. [74] developed an MC-LR aptasensor on an AuNP@MoS2-TiONB platform, which produced a LOD value of 0.7 ng L −1 , which is still ∼2 orders of magnitudes higher than that of the aptasensor (PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 SH-Apt) reported in this work. As can be seen in Table  1, other MC-LR aptasensors and immunosensors have LOD values ranging from 0.1-200 ng L −1 , which implies that the aptasensor being reported in this study is very sensitive.   Zhang et al. [73] reported a LOD value of 20 ng L −1 for an MC-LR immunosensor based on Au nanoparticles (AuNPs)@metal-organic framework (MIL-101) composite as a platform. Thus, the immunosensor's LOD value was by~4 orders of magnitudes higher than what was obtained for the MC-LR aptasensor developed in this current work. Liu et al. [74] developed an MC-LR aptasensor on an AuNP@MoS 2 -TiONB platform, which produced a LOD value of 0.7 ng L −1 , which is still~2 orders of magnitudes higher than that of the aptasensor (PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 |SH-Apt) reported in this work. As can be seen in Table 1, other MC-LR aptasensors and immunosensors have LOD values ranging from 0.1-200 ng L −1 , which implies that the aptasensor being reported in this study is very sensitive.

Cross-Reactivity of Aptasensor
The cross-reactivity of the impedimetric GCE|PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 |SH-Apt aptasensor for MC-LR was studied by assessing its Bode phase angle responses to zearalenone (ZEO), 17β-estradiol (EE2), nodularin-R (NODL-R), microcystin-RR (MC-RR) and microcystin-YR (MC-YR), which are toxins present in environmental water samples. The bar chart in Figure 12 summarizes the -Φ responses of the aptasensor when it was applied to 10 mM PBS solution spiked with 0.1 ng L −1 toxin. The toxins gave -Φ values ranging from 0.23 • to 1.67 • , which are very low compared to the -Φ value of 27 • for MC-LR. The result shows that the aptasensor is highly selective for MC-LR, even where the toxins differ from MC-LR only in their amino acid residue, such as for MC-RR and MS-YR, where leucine is replaced by arginine and tyrosine, respectively. The cross-reactivity study was validated with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). bar chart in Figure 12 summarizes the −Φ responses of the aptasensor when it was applied to 10 mM PBS solution spiked with 0.1 ng L −1 toxin. The toxins gave −Φ values ranging from 0.23° to 1.67°, which are very low compared to the −Φ value of 27° for MC-LR. The result shows that the aptasensor is highly selective for MC-LR, even where the toxins differ from MC-LR only in their amino acid residue, such as for MC-RR and MS-YR, where leucine is replaced by arginine and tyrosine, respectively. The cross-reactivity study was validated with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Conclusions
In this study, a novel in situ electro-synthesized GCEPDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite was prepared and evaluated. SAXS and AFM studies revealed that the PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 formed polydispersed nanoparticles. The EIS-response studies of the GCEPDMA-PVS-Ag 0 SH-Apt aptasensor and its constituent materials were performed by Bode phase angle signal transduction. The aptasensor's DLR and LOD values were evaluated to be 0.01-0.1 ng L −1 MC-LR and 0.003 ng L −1 MC-LR, respectively, which suggest its high sensitivity compared to other sensors (including MOF-based aptasensors and immunosensor, as well as MIP-based sensors, etc.) reported for MC-LR. The GCEPDMA-PVS-Ag 0 SH-Apt aptasensor exhibited very low cross-reactivity toward structurally related toxins and common estrogens (e.g., EE2) found in natural water samples.

Data Availability Statement:
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restriction.

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Conclusions
In this study, a novel in situ electro-synthesized GCE|PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 nanocomposite was prepared and evaluated. SAXS and AFM studies revealed that the PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 formed polydispersed nanoparticles. The EIS-response studies of the GCE|PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 |SH-Apt aptasensor and its constituent materials were performed by Bode phase angle signal transduction. The aptasensor's DLR and LOD values were evaluated to be 0.01-0.1 ng L −1 MC-LR and 0.003 ng L −1 MC-LR, respectively, which suggest its high sensitivity compared to other sensors (including MOF-based aptasensors and immunosensor, as well as MIP-based sensors, etc.) reported for MC-LR. The GCE|PDMA-PVS-Ag 0 |SH-Apt aptasensor exhibited very low cross-reactivity toward structurally related toxins and common estrogens (e.g., EE2) found in natural water samples.
Author Contributions: M.P.B., conceptualisation, Methodology, Investigation, Writing-Original Draft Preparation. U.F., data curation, validation, writing -reviewing and editing, A.R.W., data curation, writing-reviewing and editing. E.I., conceptualisation, project administration, supervision, writing-reviewing and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement:
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restriction.