Study on the Preparation and Hydration Properties of a New Cementitious Material for Tailings Discharge

Blast furnace slag (BFS) is often used as a cement-based raw material for underground filling and surface cemented paste discharge of tailings during mining processes. This paper studied a new cement-based material (NCM) with BFS to replace ordinary Portland cement (OPC). A uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) experiment was used to test the mechanical strength of samples; X-ray diffraction and thermal gravity experiments were used to test the crystalline phases and amount of hydration products by samples; a scanning electron microscope experiment was used to observe the influence of the hydration products morphology by samples; mercury intrusion porosimetry experiment was used to analyze the pore size distribution of samples. The samples with NCM had an optimum UCS; the crystalline phases of the hydration products were similar in OPC and NCM. However, the amount of product formed in OPC was less than that in NCM at the same curing time; more ettringite and calcium silicate hydrate were produced in samples with NCM, which filled the pores and enhanced the UCS of the samples. The final mercury intrusion volume of the samples with NCM were lower than the samples with OPC at the same curing time, which showed that samples with NCM had lower porosities. For the samples with NCM and OPC cured from 7 days to 28 days, the mercury intrusion volume was reduced by 18% and 13%, and the most common pore size of the samples reduced by 53% and 29%, respectively. This showed after 21 days curing time, the pores of all the samples getting smaller; however, the samples with NCM were more compact. The main ingredients of the NCM were clinker, lime, gypsum and BFS, and its ratio was 14:6:10:70. The content of additives to NCM was 0.4%, and the ratio of sodium sulfate: alum: sodium fluorosilicate was 2:1:1.


Introduction
After the ore has been recovered from underground, tailings are usually treated in two ways [1].One method is filling the tailings in the underground goafs.This treatment can reduce the accumulation of tailings on the ground, and ensure the safety of underground operations.This method has been widely promoted in underground mining operations [2].The filling method can remove about 50% of the tailings, and the remaining part is usually discharged in the tailings pond [3][4][5].However, this method is prone to dam breaks, environmental pollution, and cause casualties [6,7].For example, on 8 September 2008, a major tailings dam broke in Xinta mining Co., Ltd., of Lixian county, Linfen city, Shanxi province, causing 281 deaths [8].According to a study by the Clarke University's pollution assessment team, the damage caused by tailings pond accidents ranked 18th among 93 types of accidents and hazards worldwide [9].In view of the disadvantage of tailings pond, some scholars combined both methods and proposed the technology of cemented paste discharge of tailings (CPDT) [10,11].The method involved adding some cement to the tailings and discharging them to valleys or subsidence areas; the tailings need to be transported by pipes or belts.This method guarantees the stability of the tailings for the cemented piles.In addition, mines no longer need to build tailings pond and can also achieve safe pile-up.Because the cemented tailings pile can be built up to a high height, the limited footprint can pile up more tailings than tailings ponds.Presently, this technology has been applied and developed in some metal mines [11].
During the cemented paste backfill, the amount of cement was 2% to 7% of the total weight of the tailing slurry, and it may be up to 10% to remain independent across pillar extraction process [12].Cement costs account for more than 60-80% of the filling costs, as discussed by Li et al. [13].The idea of CPDT was derived from cemented paste backfill, thus, the process of CPDT was similar to this, and the cost of cement also occupied a large proportion of CPDT costs.Therefore, the search for cheap, cementitious industrial by-products to replace cement and reduce the cost of CPDT is of great significance.Blast furnace slag (BFS) is one of the by-products released from blast furnace [14,15].At present, China produces 0.3 billion tons of BFS every year [16], which causes a great waste of resources.The major chemical compositions consist of CaO, SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 .Moreover, it has a small amount of MgO, FeO and sulfide.The higher proportions of CaO, Al 2 O 3 and MgO, the better activity of the BFS [17].It was an alternative material to replace ordinary Portland cement (OPC), which could improve some properties and bring economic and environmental benefits [18].Previous works have already studied the hydration activity of BFS and its excitation mechanisms such as alkali activation and mechanical activation [19][20][21].He et al. [22] investigated the effect of BFS (both dry-separation and wet-milling) on the properties of cement slurry indicated that as the increase of dry-separation BFS, the initial and final setting time gradually decreased, while the wet-grinding BFS system showed the opposite trend.Yin et al. [23] investigated the environmental perspectives of recycling various combustion ashes in cement production and indicated that there was a range (5-10% by weight) of ashes for mixed cement production, beyond which may cause significant changes in cement composition.Cihangir et al. [24] studied the use of BFS in paste backfill by using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, and drew the conclusion that the BFS has great potential for use as an alternative binder in cement paste backfill.
However, there is limited research on the performance of tailings under the condition of adding some additives when BFS, clinker, lime and gypsum were mixed according to a certain proportion.Therefore, the main purpose of this paper was to study the results of a new cement material's effect on the strength and pore volume development for tailings.Clinker plus lime and gypsum were used as stimulants, and a small amount of sodium sulfate, alum and sodium fluorosilicate were used as additives to make a new type of tailings cementitious material (NCM).The effect of different amounts of compound activator on the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of CPDT samples with NCM was explored.Thermal gravity (TG) and differential thermal gravimetric (DTG) were carried out to assess the amount of hydration products of different cementitious materials on microstructural development [25].The SEM was used to analyze the composition and microcosmic morphology of the hydration products of the samples with OPC and NCM at the same curing time [26].Finally, the microscope pore structures of the samples were studied through the mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) experiment [27].

Water and Binders
The water used for the experiment was tap water.OPC was the most familiar binder used in the disposing of the tailings [28].NCM was made up of BFS, lime, gypsum, clinker, sodium sulfate, alums and sodium fluosilicate.The performance results of the NCM to CPDT were compared with OPC.

Tailings
The tailings taken back from the site were precipitated, dehydrated and dried, then, the particle size characteristics were analyzed.The results are shown in Table 1.The d 10 , d 30 , d 50 , d 60 and d 90 represent the cumulative content of the particle composition curve, with corresponding particle size of (volume fraction) 10%, 30%, 50%, 60% and 90%, respectively.The main chemical composition of the tailings was shown in Table 2.According to non-uniform coefficient and curvature coefficient, the tailings belong to the graded bad material category.The median particle size was 38.3 µm, which is characteristic of fine tailings.The specific surface area of the BFS was 475 m 2 /kg and the OPC was 312 m 2 /kg.The chemical composition of the materials used in this test is shown in Table 2.

Preparation of CPDT samples
In this study, the concentration of the CPDT samples was 78%, and the mix proportion adopted included a water-to-cement (w/c) ratio of 5.6 and a binder (NCM) content of 4.5 wt.% of the tailings.The w/c ratio and cement ratio in all mixtures remained constant.The basic principle of using this binder content was to balance cost and strength.According to the ratio of the tests, BFS, lime, gypsum and clinker were mixed to produce the new cement-based material [29][30][31].The weighed tailings and dry materials were mixed in a container until a uniform color was obtained.Then, the weighed water was added to the container and mixed until a uniform paste was obtained.They were then stirred with a mixer for 7 min.The prepared CPDT samples were poured into plastic containers with a diameter of 5 cm and a height of 10 cm.They were cured with a controlled temperature of 20 ± 2 • C and more than 95% relative humidity for different curing time (3 days, 7 days and 28 days).Nearly 124 CPDT samples were prepared for the UCS, SEM MIP experiments.Furthermore, samples for XRD and TG/DTG analysis were prepared according to the procedure above.The w/c ratio of all the samples was 2 (to represents the high volume of water in CPDT).Various tests were subjected to the NCM and the OPC samples after the required curing time.Nearly eight CPDT samples were prepared in this study.

The UCS Experiment
The mechanical strength or the stability of the CPDT samples was usually evaluated using UCS [12,32] in accordance with TYE-300D (Wuxi Jianyi Instrument Machinery Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China), as illustrated in Figure 1.UCS tests were carried out on the CPDT samples with different amount of NCM and OPC and curing 3, 7 and 28 days.The load was executed at a relatively slow rate (0.1 kN/s).
Processes 2018, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 18 Various tests were subjected to the NCM and the OPC samples after the required curing time.Nearly eight CPDT samples were prepared in this study.

The UCS Experiment
The mechanical strength or the stability of the CPDT samples was usually evaluated using UCS [12,32] in accordance with TYE-300D (Wuxi Jianyi Instrument Machinery Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China), as illustrated in Figure 1.UCS tests were carried out on the CPDT samples with different amount of NCM and OPC and curing 3, 7 and 28 days.The load was executed at a relatively slow rate (0.1 kN/s).

The XRD Experiment
XRD was a common measurement for crystal phases structure identification in cement-based materials slurry [21].By using Empyrean Diffractometer, the analyses were carried out under the 2θ range of 5-60° and 0.02° step to study the crystalline phases of the samples, as illustrated in Figure 2. XRD (PANalytical B.V., Almelo, Netherlands) analyses were performed on dried and powdered cement-based slurry.

The XRD Experiment
XRD was a common measurement for crystal phases structure identification in cement-based materials slurry [21].By using Empyrean Diffractometer, the analyses were carried out under the 2-θ range of 5-60 • and 0.02 • step to study the crystalline phases of the samples, as illustrated in Figure 2. XRD (PANalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands) analyses were performed on dried and powdered cement-based slurry.Various tests were subjected to the NCM and the OPC samples after the required curing time.Nearly eight CPDT samples were prepared in this study.

The UCS Experiment
The mechanical strength or the stability of the CPDT samples was usually evaluated using UCS [12,32] in accordance with TYE-300D (Wuxi Jianyi Instrument Machinery Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China), as illustrated in Figure 1.UCS tests were carried out on the CPDT samples with different amount of NCM and OPC and curing 3, 7 and 28 days.The load was executed at a relatively slow rate (0.1 kN/s).

The XRD Experiment
XRD was a common measurement for crystal phases structure identification in cement-based materials slurry [21].By using Empyrean Diffractometer, the analyses were carried out under the 2θ range of 5-60° and 0.02° step to study the crystalline phases of the samples, as illustrated in Figure 2. XRD (PANalytical B.V., Almelo, Netherlands) analyses were performed on dried and powdered cement-based slurry.

The TG/DTG Experiment
TG and DTG tests were performed to assess the amount of hydration products of the different cement-based materials on the microstructural development of the sample.This was done using a STA449F3 TG analyzer (NET Scientific Instruments Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) that can raise temperatures up to 1200 • C, as illustrated in Figure 3.The temperature was increased from room temperature to 900 • C at a rate of 10 • C/min N 2 purge.The reason why the temperature was not raised to 1200 • C was that the mass quality does not change when the temperature was higher than 900 • C. The weight change sensitivity 1 µg/min, the test standard has been followed GB/T 27761-2011.The samples used for TG and DTG experiment were the same that with XRD experiment.
Processes 2018, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 18 2.2.3.The TG/DTG Experiment TG and DTG tests were performed to assess the amount of hydration products of the different cement-based materials on the microstructural development of the sample.This was done using a STA449F3 TG analyzer (NET Scientific Instruments Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) that can raise temperatures up to 1200 °C, as illustrated in Figure 3.The temperature was increased from room temperature to 900 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min N2 purge.The reason why the temperature was not raised to 1200 °C was that the mass quality does not change when the temperature was higher than 900 °C.The weight change sensitivity 1 μg/min, the test standard has been followed GB/T 27761-2011.The samples used for TG and DTG experiment were the same that with XRD experiment.

The SEM Experiment
SEM analysis was used to observe the influence of the hydration products morphology on the samples with NCM and OPC [33].The SEM observations were carried out under a 7001F analyzer (Japan Electronics Corporation, Shanghai, China), as illustrated in Figure 4.The magnification levels were in the range of 10-500 k. .

The MIP Experiment
MIP is a high precision method for analyzing the micropore structure of materials [34].Under continuous pressure, the volume of mercury invading the sample could be determined according to the external pressure, and the pore size distribution of the sample could be obtained.It was measured using a Micromeritics Auto Pore IV-9500 analyzer (Micromeritics Instrument (Shanghai) Ltd.,

The SEM Experiment
SEM analysis was used to observe the influence of the hydration products morphology on the samples with NCM and OPC [33].The SEM observations were carried out under a 7001F analyzer (Japan Electronics Corporation, Shanghai, China), as illustrated in Figure 4.The magnification levels were in the range of 10-500 k.
Processes 2018, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 18 2.2.3.The TG/DTG Experiment TG and DTG tests were performed to assess the amount of hydration products of the different cement-based materials on the microstructural development of the sample.This was done using a STA449F3 TG analyzer (NET Scientific Instruments Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) that can raise temperatures up to 1200 °C, as illustrated in Figure 3.The temperature was increased from room temperature to 900 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min N2 purge.The reason why the temperature was not raised to 1200 °C was that the mass quality does not change when the temperature was higher than 900 °C.The weight change sensitivity 1 μg/min, the test standard has been followed GB/T 27761-2011.The samples used for TG and DTG experiment were the same that with XRD experiment.

The SEM Experiment
SEM analysis was used to observe the influence of the hydration products morphology on the samples with NCM and OPC [33].The SEM observations were carried out under a 7001F analyzer (Japan Electronics Corporation, Shanghai, China), as illustrated in Figure 4.The magnification levels were in the range of 10-500 k.

The MIP Experiment
MIP is a high precision method for analyzing the micropore structure of materials [34].Under continuous pressure, the volume of mercury invading the sample could be determined according to the external pressure, and the pore size distribution of the sample could be obtained.It was measured using a Micromeritics Auto Pore IV-9500 analyzer (Micromeritics Instrument (Shanghai) Ltd., Shanghai, China) with a range of 33,000 psia (228 MPa), as shown in Figure 5.The instrument can

The MIP Experiment
MIP is a high precision method for analyzing the micropore structure of materials [34].Under continuous pressure, the volume of mercury invading the sample could be determined according to the external pressure, and the pore size distribution of the sample could be obtained.It was measured using a Micromeritics Auto Pore IV-9500 analyzer (Micromeritics Instrument (Shanghai) Ltd., Shanghai, China) with a range of 33,000 psia (228 MPa), as shown in Figure 5.The instrument can detect diameters ranging from 0.005 µm to 360 µm, while mercury injection volumes can be as accurate as 0.1 µL.The center samples were obtained from cylindrical specimens, weighing approximately 1.3 g.All of the samples were dried in a 50 • C oven until the quality was no longer reduced, the pore volume will not change at this drying temperature [35].The samples were then immersed in mercury under gradually increasing pressure.The relationship between the test pressure and the diameter applies to Washburn-Laplace's law, as the following equation [36]: where, P was the applied pressure; d was the pore diameter of the sample, σ was the surface tension (N/m) and θ was the contact angle between the pore wall and the mercury.The contact angle was assumed 140 • in this study [37,38].
detect diameters ranging from 0.005 μm to 360 μm, while mercury injection volumes can be as accurate as 0.1 μL.The center samples were obtained from cylindrical specimens, weighing approximately 1.3 g.All of the samples were dried in a 50 °C oven until the quality was no longer reduced, the pore volume will not change at this drying temperature [35].The samples were then immersed in mercury under gradually increasing pressure.The relationship between the test pressure and the diameter applies to Washburn-Laplace's law, as the following equation [36]: where, P was the applied pressure; d was the pore diameter of the sample,  was the surface tension (N/m) and  was the contact angle between the pore wall and the mercury.The contact angle was assumed 140° in this study [37,38].

Compound Activator Dosage Optimization
The hydration activity of BFS can only be stimulated under certain conditions.Common excitation methods included mechanical excitation, acid excitation and alkali excitation.In this test, the specific surface area of the BFS was controlled by 475 m 2 /kg.Lime and gypsum combined with clinker were used to carry out compound excitation.The influence of different activators on the UCS of the samples with NCM was studied to optimize the compound activator dosage.
According to the test analysis, the three levels of clinker were 12%, 14% and 16%; the three levels of lime were 4%, 6% and 8% and the three levels of gypsum were 8%, 10% and 12%.A three-level, four-factor orthogonal design test L9 (3 4 ) was conducted in this study.The orthogonal test plan and test results were shown in Table 3.All proportions in this paper were mass percentages.

Compound Activator Dosage Optimization
The hydration activity of BFS can only be stimulated under certain conditions.Common excitation methods included mechanical excitation, acid excitation and alkali excitation.In this test, the specific surface area of the BFS was controlled by 475 m 2 /kg.Lime and gypsum combined with clinker were used to carry out compound excitation.The influence of different activators on the UCS of the samples with NCM was studied to optimize the compound activator dosage.
According to the test analysis, the three levels of clinker were 12%, 14% and 16%; the three levels of lime were 4%, 6% and 8% and the three levels of gypsum were 8%, 10% and 12%.A three-level, four-factor orthogonal design test L 9 (3 4 ) was conducted in this study.The orthogonal test plan and test results were shown in Table 3.All proportions in this paper were mass percentages.Where X 1 denotes clinker, X 2 deontes lime, X 3 denotes gypsum and X 4 denotes blast furnace slag (BFS).
Range analysis is often used to analyze the most influential factors in experimental data.In this test, the UCS data were treated with this method; the results are shown in Table 4.It can be seen from Table 4 that the UCS measures of 3 days, 7 days and 28 days for the activator optimum formula represented 14% of clinker, 6% of lime and 10% of gypsum.At these ratio conditions, the UCS of the samples with the NCM was the biggest.The reason for this was that under this ratio, BFS was hydrated to the fullest extent, and the remaining of lime and gypsum were hydrated the least, while the structure of the samples was more compact.
The range analysis cannot meticulously reflect the degree which the measured values agree with each other and data fluctuations caused by test errors during the experiment.It is also impossible to give an accurate quantitative estimate of the importance of the influence of the factors.To compensate for the lack of intuitive analysis, the variance was analyzed for the data above; the results are shown in Table 5.In Table 5, we find that the results of the variance and range analyses were consistent.For the UCS of 3 days, X 3 (gypsum) had the greatest impact, X 2 (lime) was second and X 1 (Clinker) had minimal impact.For the UCS of 7 days, X 2 had the greatest impact, X 1 was second and X 3 had minimal impact.For the strength of 28 days, X 1 had the greatest impact, X 2 was second and X 3 had minimal impact.This showed that for the CPDT samples at the time of 3 days, gypsum had the greatest effect on the hydration reaction, while the role of gypsum was gradually reduced from 7 to 28 days.The reason for this phenomenon was that a large amount of SO 2− 4 in gypsum can promote the hydration reaction of cementitious materials in the early stage.The absorption of SO 2− 4 due to the hydration products of the C-S-H gels resulted in the decrease of SO 2− 4 in the solution, which has a negative effect on the development of the UCS.Lime contained a large amount of OH − , and excitation agents need to work in alkaline solution; thus, from 3 to 7 days, the effect of lime on the UCS of the samples gradually increased.From 7 to 28 days, due to the progress of the hydration reaction and self-drying, the moisture in the samples gradually decreased.Additionally, the effect of OH − on the hydration reaction gradually decreased, which was consistent with the findings of Cui and Fall [39].The influence of BFS on the UCS increased from 3 to 28 days.This showed that with the progress of the hydration reaction, BFS was the main component of the cementitious materials.
Based on the analysis above, the optimal ratio was 14% for clinker, 6% for lime, 10% for gypsum and 70% for BFS.The UCS of the test samples gathered by adding this ratio of materials was compared with that adding OPC; the results were shown in Table 6.The UCS of the samples with NCM was higher than that with OPC across all aging time.The same method was used to optimize the addition of sodium sulfate, alum and sodium fluorosilicate.The results were obtained when the materials ratio of clinker: lime: gypsum: BFS was 14:6:10:70, and the amount of admixture added was 0.4% of NCM.The ratio of sodium sulfate: alum: sodium fluorosilicate was 2:1:1, and the samples had the highest UCS across all ages.0.831 MPa at 3 days, 2.019 MPa at 7 days, 3.307 MPa at 28 days with NCM were 2.4, 2.4 and 1.7 times higher as compared with OPC.The reason for this was that the fineness of the slag was larger than with OPC, and the finer of the slag, the larger the specific surface area and surface energy, significantly improving the activity of the slag.The fine particles of the slag filled in smaller pores to lower the porosity of the samples, which could also increase the strength of the samples (the conclusion will be confirmed in part 3.4).In addition, the slag had been stimulated at the beginning because of the addition of admixtures and more hydration products were produced in the earlier time.From the discussion above, it seems the NCM can replace OPC with regards to strength.

The Crystalline Phases and Amount of Hydration Products of NCM and OPC
The samples of NCM and OPC were prepared and cured at 20 ± 2 • C with relativity humidity greater than 95% for 7 and 28 days.The hydration reaction was then dried in a 50 • C oven until the quality was no longer reduced.The coupling excitation of the alkaline environment and mechanical grinding promotes the pozzolanic reaction of BFS, thus contributing to the development of the UCS for the samples.The crystalline phases of cement-based materials hydration products of NCM and OPC was demonstrated by the experimental evidence presented in Figures 6 and 7 for curing time of 7 and 28 days.The increasing amount of them were presented in Figures 8 and 9.These figures present the results of XRD, TG and DTG analyses of the powdered cemented materials.It can be seen from Figures 6 and 7 that the crystalline phases of the cement materials hydration products and the materials that do not participate in reaction like SiO 2 were almost the same.However, from 7 to 28 days, the diffraction peaks of CaCO 3 and C-S-H were stronger than those at 7 days, and the diffraction peaks of Et and calcium hydroxide (CH) became weak, whether it was OPC or NCM.It indicated that the phases produced by NCM was similar to that produced by OPC, however, the amount of each product changed.OPC NCM From Figures 8 and 9, the valleys at these different temperatures range (50 • C to 800 • C) showed the existence of C-S-H, ettringite, calcium hydroxide (CH) and calcite as demonstrated in several studies [40][41][42].The weight loss between 50 • C and 105 • C was due to the disappearance of free water and bound water.The weight loss between 110 • C and 200 • C was due to the dehydration of ettringite, gypsum and C-S-H.The weight loss between 450 • C and 500 • C was attributed to the decomposition of CH, and the significant weight loss at 650-750 • C results from the decomposition of calcite.The comparison of the TG curves of the samples with OPC and NCM showed that the weight loss of water evaporation was almost the same, however, the weight loss caused by the dehydration of the cement-based hydration products (110 • C-200 • C) of NCM was greater than OPC.This indicated that more cement-based hydration products were generated in NCM.It can also be seen from Figures 8  and 9 that the amount of CH decreased, indicating that more CH participated in the hydration reaction, generating stronger hydration products and enhancing the strength of the CPDT samples.Both figures showed that the amount of bound water and the residual quality of OPC were greater than in NCM, indicating that there were more unstable hydration products in OPC; NCM produces more stable hydration products.

The Hydration Mechanism of NCM and OPC
The CPDT samples made of the optimum ratio of the NCM were cured at 20 ± 2 °C with relative humidity greater than 95% for 3, 7, and 28 days.The hydration reaction was then terminated with anhydrous ethanol and dried in a 50 °C oven until the quality no longer reduced.The samples were sprayed with gold and placed in an SEM experimental setup for microanalysis.The hydration products composition and microstructure of the samples with NCM determined the macroscopic strength of the CPDT samples.Figures 10-12 show the SEM images of the hydration products morphologies at 3, 7 and 28 days, respectively.

The Hydration Mechanism of NCM and OPC
The CPDT samples made of the optimum ratio of the NCM were cured at 20 ± 2 • C with relative humidity greater than 95% for 3, 7, and 28 days.The hydration reaction was then terminated with anhydrous ethanol and dried in a 50 • C oven until the quality no longer reduced.The samples were sprayed with gold and placed in an SEM experimental setup for microanalysis.The hydration products composition and microstructure of the samples with NCM determined the macroscopic strength of the CPDT samples.Figures 10-12 show the SEM images of the hydration products morphologies at 3, 7 and 28 days, respectively.In Figure 10a, the CPDT samples with NCM which had been hydrated for 3 days generated a large amount of ettringite and a small amount of C-S-H gels.While Figure 10b showed the sample with OPC hydrated for 3 days, the hydration product was only ettringite.In Figure 11a, the hydration reaction of the sample with NCM was observed for 7 days.The ettringite was reduced, which a large amount of C-S-H gels encapsulated the ettringite and the porosity decreased.The UCS of the sample with NCM showed great improvement, as seen in Table 6.On the other hand, in Figure 11b, the amount of C-S-H produced in the sample with OPC was less than that with NCM at 7 days, a large amount of ettringite was exposed on the surface, and the degree of envelopment for the ettringite was not as high as that with the NCM.In Figure 12a, the sample with NCM at 28 days produced a large amount of C-S-H gels and the ettringite was completely encapsulated and existed in entirety, which greatly increased the UCS of the CPDT sample.At the same time, in Figure 12b, the external surface of the sample with OPC was uneven.A large amount of C-S-H gels were generated too, however, some of the ettringite was still exposed on the surface, which showed that the amount of C-S-H generated was relatively less.This affects the UCS of the CPDT sample.In Figure 10a, the CPDT samples with NCM which had been hydrated for 3 days generated a large amount of ettringite and a small amount of C-S-H gels.While Figure 10b showed the sample with OPC hydrated for 3 days, the hydration product was only ettringite.In Figure 11a, the hydration reaction of the sample with NCM was observed for 7 days.The ettringite was reduced, which a large amount of C-S-H gels encapsulated the ettringite and the porosity decreased.The UCS of the sample with NCM showed great improvement, as seen in Table 6.On the other hand, in Figure 11b, the amount of C-S-H produced in the sample with OPC was less than that with NCM at 7 days, a large amount of ettringite was exposed on the surface, and the degree of envelopment for the ettringite was not as high as that with the NCM.In Figure 12a, the sample with NCM at 28 days produced a large amount of C-S-H gels and the ettringite was completely encapsulated and existed in entirety, which greatly increased the UCS of the CPDT sample.At the same time, in Figure 12b, the external  In Figure 10a, the CPDT samples with NCM which had been hydrated for 3 days generated a large amount of ettringite and a small amount of C-S-H gels.While Figure 10b showed the sample with OPC hydrated for 3 days, the hydration product was only ettringite.In Figure 11a, the hydration reaction of the sample with NCM was observed for 7 days.The ettringite was reduced, which a large amount of C-S-H gels encapsulated the ettringite and the porosity decreased.The UCS of the sample with NCM showed great improvement, as seen in Table 6.On the other hand, in Figure 11b, the amount of C-S-H produced in the sample with OPC was less than that with NCM at 7 days, a large amount of ettringite was exposed on the surface, and the degree of envelopment for the ettringite was not as high as that with the NCM.In Figure 12a, the sample with NCM at 28 days produced a large amount of C-S-H gels and the ettringite was completely encapsulated and existed in entirety, which greatly increased the UCS of the CPDT sample.At the same time, in Figure 12b, the external The reason why the microscopic structure images of the sample with NCM at the same ages were compact than that with OPC can be explained as follows: when gypsum and lime are added to NCM, the lime provides Ca 2+ (a raw material for hydration reactions) and OH − .In the alkaline environment of the reaction, calcium sulfate provides Ca 2+ and SO 2− 4 , and SO 2− 4 reacts with C 3 A to produce secondary ettringite.The resulting ettringite was filled in the pores, and the strength of the samples was enhanced.The SO 2− 4 was absorbed by the C-S-H so that the amount of ettringite was produced and thus the pore structure was coarsened.This was not only related to OH − concentration, but also related to SO 2− 4 concentration.A high concentration of SO 2− 4 can increase the amount of secondary C-S-H and ettringite.
The BFS itself was not active, however, in the calcium hydroxide solution, a significant hydration reaction occurred, thereby inspiring its pozzolanic effect.Hydration was faster in the saturated calcium hydroxide solution.The hydration reaction was generally considered to be the following: where the value of x depends on the type of mixture, the ratio of lime and active silica, the ambient temperature and the duration of the action.The value was generally equal to 1 or was slightly larger, and the value of n generally between 1 and 2.5.The process of the CH interacting with SiO 2 was such that the amorphous silicic acid absorbs Ca 2+ to form an indefinite component of the adsorption system, and an amorphous hydrated calcium silicate was then formed.This transformed into microcrystalline or crystalline calcium silicate gels after a long time period.CH interacts with Al 2 O 3 to form calcium aluminate hydrate (3CaO•Al 2 O 3 •6H 2 O).Hydrated calcium sulfoaluminate is a water-insoluble needle crystal that precipitated around the clinker particles and impeded moisture.Therefore, entry has played an important role in delaying the coagulation of cement-based materials.When gypsum was present in the liquid phase, it reacted with the calcium hydrated aluminate to form high-sulfur hydration calcium sulfoaluminate (3CaO

The Pore Size Distribution of CPDT Samples with NCM and OPC
For research the effects of the new cement-based material on the pore size distribution of the tailings, the MIP tests on CPDT samples were carried out after curing 7 and 28 days.The volumes of invading mercury obtained by the MIP tests were compared with the pore diameters of the CPDT samples, which was plotted in Figure 13.According to the functional relationship of Equation ( 1), the pressure applied by the device was inversely proportional to the pore size.The intrusion volume of mercury increases as the intrusive pressure increases.In Figure 13, the normalized volume increased slowly at the beginning of the lower pressure, where, primarily, pores larger than 7.2 μm were intruded.It increased rapidly at pore sizes of 4.9-6 μm.When the pressure caused the tailings particles rearrange, the normalized volume will rise to a larger value under smaller pressure.Thereafter, pores of less than 0.01 μm would be filled with mercury.However, even under nearly the highest pressure condition, it was difficult for mercury to enter the smallest and closed pores in the sample.Therefore, the mercury intrusion curve eventually tended to flatten.
In Figure 13a, for the normalized volume of the samples after curing for 7 days, the final normalized volume of the sample with NCM was about 8.0% larger than that with OPC.In Figure 13b, for the final normalized volume of the sample after curing for 28 days, the sample with NCM was about 11% larger than that with OPC.It can be seen from Figure 13a and 13b that after curing for 28 days, the porosity of the sample with OPC was reduced by 13%, and with NCM it was reduced by 18% compared with samples cured for 7 days.This showed that as the curing time increased, the In Figure 13, the normalized volume increased slowly at the beginning of the lower pressure, where, primarily, pores larger than 7.2 µm were intruded.It increased rapidly at pore sizes of 4.9-6 µm.When the pressure caused the tailings particles rearrange, the normalized volume will rise to a larger value under smaller pressure.Thereafter, pores of less than 0.01 µm would be filled with mercury.However, even under nearly the highest pressure condition, it was difficult for mercury to enter the smallest and closed pores in the sample.Therefore, the mercury intrusion curve eventually tended to flatten.
In Figure 13a, for the normalized volume of the samples after curing for 7 days, the final normalized volume of the sample with NCM was about 8.0% larger than that with OPC.In Figure 13b, for the final normalized volume of the sample after curing for 28 days, the sample with NCM was about 11% larger than that with OPC.It can be seen from Figures 13a and 13b that after curing for 28 days, the porosity of the sample with OPC was reduced by 13%, and with NCM it was reduced by 18% compared with samples cured for 7 days.This showed that as the curing time increased, the porosity of samples with OPC and NCM decreased; however, the porosity of the sample with NCM decreased more, and the sample with OPC had a higher porosity than that with NCM, whether it was 7 days or 28 days.The low porosity indicated that the hydration reaction of the sample with NCM was quicker and more complete than that with OPC at 7 days and 28 days.More hydration products were generated and filled in the interparticle pores; the results made the samples more compact and stronger.
Figure 14 showed the Log-derivative mercury volume curves of the samples after curing for 7 and 28 days.For the 7 days sample, in Figure 14a, the most common pore diameters of the samples with OPC and NCM were 2.49 µm and 2.48 µm, respectively, representing a decrease of 0.4%.For the 28 days samples, in Figure 14b, the most common pore sizes of the samples with OPC and NCM were 1.93 µm and 1.62 µm, respectively, representing a decrease of 19%.From 7 days to 28 days, the most common pore size of the sample was reduced.The sample with OPC reduced by 29%, and with NCM reduced by 53%.This showed that during this time, the hydration reaction was kept on going, however, the hydration reaction of the sample with NCM was more complete, which was consistent with the analysis in Figure 13.In addition, for either the 7 days or the 28 days log-derivative mercury volume curves, the samples with NCM had a left shift relative to that with OPC, which indicated that the most probable pore size decreased.When the mercury intrusion of the sample with OPC occurred at 7 days and the pore size ranged from 0.6 μm to 1.9 μm, the value was larger than that with NCM, which means that in this range, the pore volume of the sample with OPC was relatively larger.From 0.09 to 1.9μm, the curves of the sample with NCM were higher than that with OPC, and from 0.008 to 0.09 μm, the curve of the sample with OPC was higher than that with NCM.This showed that the sample with NCM had more macropores transformed into mesopores relative to that with OPC, and some small pores turned into dense parts.When the mercury intrusion of the samples occurred at 28 days, and the pore size ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 μm, the curves of the sample with NCM were higher than that with OPC, and from 0.2 to 0.5 μm, the sample with OPC were higher than that with NCM.When it was less than 0.2 μm, the curves of the sample with NCM were higher than that with OPC.The reason for this was that the curve of the sample with NCM shifted to the left too much after 28 days; additionally, there were more macropores converted to small and medium pores.

Conclusions and Future Work
In this paper, a new type of cementitious material was produced and compared with OPC 42.5 # When the mercury intrusion of the sample with OPC occurred at 7 days and the pore size ranged from 0.6 µm to 1.9 µm, the value was larger than that with NCM, which means that in this range, the pore volume of the sample with OPC was relatively larger.From 0.09 to 1.9µm, the curves of the sample with NCM were higher than that with OPC, and from 0.008 to 0.09 µm, the curve of the sample with OPC was higher than that with NCM.This showed that the sample with NCM had more macropores transformed into mesopores relative to that with OPC, and some small pores turned into dense parts.When the mercury intrusion of the samples occurred at 28 days, and the pore size ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 µm, the curves of the sample with NCM were higher than that with OPC, and from 0.2 to 0.5 µm, the sample with OPC were higher than that with NCM.When it was less than 0.2 µm, the curves of the sample with NCM were higher than that with OPC.The reason for this was that the

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The AutoPore IV and sample.(a) Mercury intrusion porosimetry; (b) the high-pressure test pipeline; (c) the low-pressure test pipeline; (d) the sample.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The AutoPore IV and sample.(a) Mercury intrusion porosimetry; (b) the high-pressure test pipeline; (c) the low-pressure test pipeline; (d) the sample.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.XRD images of NCM and OPC for 7 days of curing time (NCM: new cement-based material; OPC: ordinary Portland cement).

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.XRD images of NCM and OPC for 7 days of curing time (NCM: new cement-based material; OPC: ordinary Portland cement).

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.XRD images of NCM and OPC for 7 days of curing time (NCM: new cement-based material; OPC: ordinary Portland cement).

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. XRD images of NCM and OPC for 28 days of curing time.Figure 7. XRD images of NCM and OPC for 28 days of curing time.

Figure 7 .Figure 8 . 5 )Figure 8 .
Figure 7. XRD images of NCM and OPC for 28 days of curing time.Figure 7. XRD images of NCM and OPC for 28 days of curing time.Processes 2018, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 18

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. TG/DTG images of NCM and OPC for 28 days of curing time.

Processes 2018, 6 ,Figure 10 .
Figure 10.SEM images of samples with NCM and OPC for 3 days of curing time.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.SEM images of samples with NCM and OPC for 3 days of curing time.

Figure 10 .Figure 11 .Figure 12 .
Figure 10.SEM images of samples with NCM and OPC for 3 days of curing time.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.SEM images of samples with NCM and OPC for 7 days of curing time.

Figure 10 .Figure 11 .Figure 12 .
Figure 10.SEM images of samples with NCM and OPC for 3 days of curing time.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.SEM images of NCM and OPC samples for 28 days of curing time.

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.The intrusion and extrusion curves for samples with different cement materials and curing time.

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.The intrusion and extrusion curves for samples with different cement materials and curing time.

Figure 14 .
Figure 14.The log-derivative pore volume curves for samples with different cement materials and curing time.

Figure 14 .
Figure 14.The log-derivative pore volume curves for samples with different cement materials and curing time.

Table 1 .
Physical properties of the materials.

Table 2 .
Main chemical properties of the materials (OPC: ordinary Portland cement).

Table 3 .
Orthogonal test table and uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) results.

Table 4 .
Range analysis results for the UCS data.
1 R = the difference between maximum value and minimum value.

Table 6 .
The results of UCS with OPC and new cement-based material (NCM).