Laboratory Investigation of Granite Permeability after High-Temperature Exposure

This study experimentally analysed the influence of temperature levels (200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 800 ◦C) on the permeability of granite samples. At each temperature level, the applied confining pressure was in the range of 10–30 MPa, and the inlet hydraulic pressure varied below the corresponding confining pressure. The results are as follows: (i) With an increase in the temperature level, induced micro-fractures in the granites develop, and the decrement ratios of both the P-wave velocity and the density of the granite increase; (ii) The relationship between the volume flow rate and the pressure gradient is demonstrably linear and fits very well with Darcy’s law. The equivalent permeability coefficient shows an increasing trend with the temperature, and it can be best described using the mathematical expression K0 = A × 1.01T; (iii) For a given temperature level, as the confining pressure increases, the transmissivity shows a decrease, and the rate of its decrease diminishes gradually.


Introduction
Rock properties that are related to high-temperature exposure are involved in many fields, such as the disposal of nuclear wastes, underground coal gasification, and the exploitation and utilization of geothermal resources [1][2][3][4].In the case of nuclear wastes disposal, the rock mass is subjected to a high-temperature environment and is affected by the temperature gradient.Numerous studies have demonstrated that both the physical and mechanical properties of rocks are affected by temperature exposure [5][6][7].With an increase in temperature from 25 • C to 900 • C, the average mass loss rate of sandstone increases from 0 to 2.97% [8].The thermal destruction can be significantly observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) [8].Yong et al. [9] quantify thermal cracking in granite as a function of thermal stresses.Additionally, researchers investigate thermal cracking in granite, which is monitored or quantified in different ways [10][11][12].In the range of temperature exposure from 25 • C to 850 • C, the density and P-wave velocity of granite show decreases of 4.92% and 79.17%, respectively [13].The tensile strength decreases from 12.8 MPa to 1.37 MPa at different rates [13].The mechanical properties, including the peak strength and the elastic modulus of marble fluctuate when the temperature is lower than 400 • C, and gradually decrease when the temperature is greater than 400 • C [14].
Thermal damages result in changes in micro-characteristics, such as porosity, pore throat geometry, and the pore connectivity of rocks, which would directly affect the corresponding permeability [15].Zoback et al. [16] investigate the influence of micro-fracturing on permeability generally.The permeability of sandstone after high-temperature exposure slowly decreases when the temperature is below 400 • C, and increases rapidly as the temperature increases from 400 • C to 600 • C [17].The initial permeability of granite shows small changes when the temperature is below 300 • C, which is a slight increase from 300 • C to 500 • C, but a significant increase when the temperature exceeds 500 • C [18].Although many studies have been reported, the effects of temperature and the confining pressure on the permeability have not been fully understood.
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the permeability of granites after high-temperature exposure.First, cylindrical granite samples were prepared and exposed to various temperature levels (200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 800 • C).Next, a series of hydro-mechanical tests with respect to different inlet hydraulic pressures and increasing confining pressures from 10 MPa to 30 MPa were conducted.The equivalent permeability of granites as a function of temperature and confining pressure was analysed.

Sample Preparation
The coarse granites for the experiment were taken from a single rock block in Rizhao, Shandong, China.The granites are fine-grained and composed mainly of quartz, feldspar, and calcite, containing abundant large phenocrysts and having an average density of approximately 2.68 g/cm 3 .In addition, the granite materials have no surface texture that is visible to the naked eye, and are gray in color in the natural state.This kind of granite has an initial uniaxial compressive strength of approximately 104.00 MPa.The cohesive force and the internal friction angle are 19.57MPa and 49.17 • , respectively.Based on the ISRM (International Society for Rock Mechanics) standard [19], a series of cylindrical samples with lengths of 100 mm and diameters of 50 mm were machined.Both ends of the samples were polished to achieve smooth surfaces for tests.
Then, by using a high-temperature furnace, the granite samples were exposed to high temperatures (200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 800 • C).The heating rate was 10 • C/min until the set temperature level, and this temperature was maintained for 2 h to ensure that the samples heated evenly.When considering the heating rate of 10 • C/min, we assume that the heat travels fast in solids [20].Finally, the samples were naturally cooled to room temperature.The samples after high-temperature exposure are shown in Figure 1.
Processes 2018, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 14 °C [17].The initial permeability of granite shows small changes when the temperature is below 300 °C, which is a slight increase from 300 °C to 500 °C, but a significant increase when the temperature exceeds 500 °C [18].Although many studies have been reported, the effects of temperature and the confining pressure on the permeability have not been fully understood.The purpose of this paper is to investigate the permeability of granites after high-temperature exposure.First, cylindrical granite samples were prepared and exposed to various temperature levels (200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 800 °C).Next, a series of hydro-mechanical tests with respect to different inlet hydraulic pressures and increasing confining pressures from 10 MPa to 30 MPa were conducted.The equivalent permeability of granites as a function of temperature and confining pressure was analysed.

Sample Preparation
The coarse granites for the experiment were taken from a single rock block in Rizhao, Shandong, China.The granites are fine-grained and composed mainly of quartz, feldspar, and calcite, containing abundant large phenocrysts and having an average density of approximately 2.68 g/cm 3 .In addition, the granite materials have no surface texture that is visible to the naked eye, and are gray in color in the natural state.This kind of granite has an initial uniaxial compressive strength of approximately 104.00 MPa.The cohesive force and the internal friction angle are 19.57MPa and 49.17°, respectively.Based on the ISRM (International Society for Rock Mechanics) standard [19], a series of cylindrical samples with lengths of 100 mm and diameters of 50 mm were machined.Both ends of the samples were polished to achieve smooth surfaces for tests.
Then, by using a high-temperature furnace, the granite samples were exposed to high temperatures (200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 800 °C).The heating rate was 10 °C/min until the set temperature level, and this temperature was maintained for 2 h to ensure that the samples heated evenly.When considering the heating rate of 10 °C/min, we assume that the heat travels fast in solids [20].Finally, the samples were naturally cooled to room temperature.The samples after hightemperature exposure are shown in Figure 1.

Fluid Flow Test Procedure
The granite samples after high-temperature exposure were used to conduct fluid flow tests at room temperature using the LDY-50 permeability testing system (Haian county petroleum research instrument co.LTD, Nantong, China) (Figure 2).The maximum confining pressure of the system is 50 MPa.The system consists mainly of the following four units: (1) a water supplying system; (2) a triaxial cell clamping device; (3) a speed constant pressure pump; and, (4) a water measurement and collection system.Before testing, the samples were enclosed by a 3-mm-thick rubber jacket.Then, the samples were inserted into the triaxial cell clamping device with two porous stone platens over the ends to ensure an even distribution of the water pressure.Then, the water was fed using a fluid pump to the left side of the rock sample, flowed to the right side, and finally exited via a stainless steel tube.

Fluid Flow Test Procedure
The granite samples after high-temperature exposure were used to conduct fluid flow tests at room temperature using the LDY-50 permeability testing system (Haian county petroleum research instrument co.LTD, Nantong, China) (Figure 2).The maximum confining pressure of the system is 50 MPa.The system consists mainly of the following four units: (1) a water supplying system; (2) a triaxial cell clamping device; (3) a speed constant pressure pump; and, (4) a water measurement and collection system.Before testing, the samples were enclosed by a 3-mm-thick rubber jacket.Then, the samples were inserted into the triaxial cell clamping device with two porous stone platens over the ends to ensure an even distribution of the water pressure.Then, the water was fed using a fluid pump to the left side of the rock sample, flowed to the right side, and finally exited via a stainless steel tube.During the tests, for a given rock sample, the confining pressure pc was increased from 10 MPa to 30 MPa at 5MPa intervals.For a given pc, a wide range of inlet hydraulic pressures Pi lower than the designated pc was adopted repeatedly.The hydraulic difference Ps was defined as the difference between the inlet hydraulic pressure Pi and the outlet hydraulic pressure Po on the other end of the sample.In the experiment, Ps was continuously recorded using a differential pressure gauge, which had a resolution of 0.01 MPa.When the volume flow rates at the two sides of the samples were equal and stable for approximately ten minutes under a given Ps lower than pc, the samples were considered to be water-saturated, and the fluid flow was considered in a steady state; the equivalent permeability coefficient could then be obtained.By this method, the effects of the confining pressure and high temperatures on granite permeability can be discussed.

Physical Properties of Granites after High-Temperature Exposure
The ultrasonic velocity is an effective index to characterize the overall damage in the thermallycracked granite [21].The velocities of the compressional waves in the tested granite samples were measured at room conditions using a PDS-SW sonic detector (Wuhan Geostar Scientific & Technological Co., Ltd., Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China).Physical properties of samples after high-temperature treatment, including P-wave (P-wave is one of the two main types of elastic body waves, called seismic waves in seismology, the first signal from an earthquake to arrive at a seismograph.It may be transmitted through gases, liquids, or solids.)velocity and density, were measured, as listed in Table 1. Figure 3 presents the variations in density and P-wave velocity for the granite samples after high-temperature exposure, in which Δρ and Δv denote the decrement ratios of the density and Pwave velocity, respectively, and can be calculated, as follows: During the tests, for a given rock sample, the confining pressure p c was increased from 10 MPa to 30 MPa at 5MPa intervals.For a given p c , a wide range of inlet hydraulic pressures P i lower than the designated p c was adopted repeatedly.The hydraulic difference P s was defined as the difference between the inlet hydraulic pressure P i and the outlet hydraulic pressure P o on the other end of the sample.In the experiment, P s was continuously recorded using a differential pressure gauge, which had a resolution of 0.01 MPa.When the volume flow rates at the two sides of the samples were equal and stable for approximately ten minutes under a given P s lower than p c , the samples were considered to be water-saturated, and the fluid flow was considered in a steady state; the equivalent permeability coefficient could then be obtained.By this method, the effects of the confining pressure and high temperatures on granite permeability can be discussed.

Physical Properties of Granites after High-Temperature Exposure
The ultrasonic velocity is an effective index to characterize the overall damage in the thermally-cracked granite [21].The velocities of the compressional waves in the tested granite samples were measured at room conditions using a PDS-SW sonic detector (Wuhan Geostar Scientific & Technological Co., Ltd., Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China).Physical properties of samples after high-temperature treatment, including P-wave (P-wave is one of the two main types of elastic body waves, called seismic waves in seismology, the first signal from an earthquake to arrive at a seismograph.It may be transmitted through gases, liquids, or solids.)velocity and density, were measured, as listed in Table 1. Figure 3 presents the variations in density and P-wave velocity for the granite samples after high-temperature exposure, in which ∆ρ and ∆v denote the decrement ratios of the density and P-wave velocity, respectively, and can be calculated, as follows: in which ρ and ρ are the densities of rock samples in natural state (25 • C) and after high-temperature exposure, respectively, and v and v are the corresponding P-wave velocities.
in which ρ and ρ′ are the densities of rock samples in natural state (25 °C) and after high-temperature exposure, respectively, and v and v′ are the corresponding P-wave velocities.From Figure 3, in the range of temperature (T) from 200 °C to 800 °C, Δρ increases from 0.17% to 1.08%, and Δv increases from 4.0% to 64.0%.There is a negative correlation between P-wave and temperature.A relatively weak decrease of velocity occurs at a low temperature level.However, it decreases significantly with a continuous increase in the temperature, especially after 500 °C.These results suggest that a great many new, thermally induced cracks were generated during the thermal treatment.These cracks form mainly because, with an increase in the heating temperature, the loss of interlayer water and bound water, as well as a transformation in the mineral composition, occurs in the granites, resulting in the degradation of the density and the P-wave velocity [20,22].Through mercury injection testing, Zhang [23] studied the development of the internal porosity of granites with in heating temperature and found that the internal porosity shows an increase with a magnitude of 2.83 as T increases from 25 °C to 800 °C (Figure 4).Similar to Figure 3, the internal porosity experienced a slight increase from 100 °C to 500 °C.After that, the figures for porosity grow significantly above 500 °C, with a large increase of thermally induced cracks.From Figure 3, in the range of temperature (T) from 200 • C to 800 • C, ∆ρ increases from 0.17% to 1.08%, and ∆v increases from 4.0% to 64.0%.There is a negative correlation between P-wave and temperature.A relatively weak decrease of velocity occurs at a low temperature level.However, it decreases significantly with a continuous increase in the temperature, especially after 500 • C.These results suggest that a great many new, thermally induced cracks were generated during the thermal treatment.These cracks form mainly because, with an increase in the heating temperature, the loss of interlayer water and bound water, as well as a transformation in the mineral composition, occurs in the granites, resulting in the degradation of the density and the P-wave velocity [20,22].Through mercury injection testing, Zhang [23] studied the development of the internal porosity of granites with in heating temperature and found that the internal porosity shows an increase with a magnitude of 2.83 as T increases from 25 • C to 800 • C (Figure 4).Similar to Figure 3, the internal porosity experienced a slight increase from 100 • C to 500 • C.After that, the figures for porosity grow significantly above 500 • C, with a large increase of thermally induced cracks.
in which ρ and ρ′ are the densities of rock samples in natural state (25 °C) and after high-temperature exposure, respectively, and v and v′ are the corresponding P-wave velocities.From Figure 3, in the range of temperature (T) from 200 °C to 800 °C, Δρ increases from 0.17% to 1.08%, and Δv increases from 4.0% to 64.0%.There is a negative correlation between P-wave and temperature.A relatively weak decrease of velocity occurs at a low temperature level.However, it decreases significantly with a continuous increase in the temperature, especially after 500 °C.These results suggest that a great many new, thermally induced cracks were generated during the thermal treatment.These cracks form mainly because, with an increase in the heating temperature, the loss of interlayer water and bound water, as well as a transformation in the mineral composition, occurs in the granites, resulting in the degradation of the density and the P-wave velocity [20,22].Through mercury injection testing, Zhang [23] studied the development of the internal porosity of granites with in heating temperature and found that the internal porosity shows an increase with a magnitude of 2.83 as T increases from 25 °C to 800 °C (Figure 4).Similar to Figure 3, the internal porosity experienced a slight increase from 100 °C to 500 °C.After that, the figures for porosity grow significantly above 500 °C, with a large increase of thermally induced cracks.Then, scanning electron microscope (SEM) tests were conducted on the sample granites.Blocks with a size of approximately 8.0 × 8.0 × 5.0 mm 3 were cut from the thermally damaged samples.To achieve a better comparison, SEM was also conducted on the samples at room temperature.Magnifications of 500, 1500, and 5000 were selected in the present study.During the scanning electron microscope observation, we first observed the fracture development from different angles in the sample, and then, the representative points were selected for scanning.Figure 5 shows the typical SEM images of the thermally damaged granites.For T = 25 • C, there exist almost no micro-fractures in the granite.In the range of 200-400 • C, the quantity of the micro-cracks inside and across the aggregates increases slightly.However, as T increases from 400 • C to 800 • C, thermally induced cracks were developed along inter-crystalline boundaries and the surrounding crystals.Both of the cracks opening at the boundaries of aggregates and the number of internal pores in the rock increased greatly (Figure 5e).As analysed by Zhang et al. [24], thermally induced cracks are the result of strong bound water loss, dihydroxylation loss of constituent water, and solid mineral expansion in the temperature range of 100-500 • C. Intra-granular cracks in feldspar and quartz crystal appeared successively at temperatures higher than the second threshold, 573 • C [18].During the heating process, physical properties present significant changes at the temperature of about 573 • C, where the α-β transition occurs.Inner cracks extend quickly and the porosity increases, leading to a reduction of the density and an increase of the conductivity [25].It is presumed that the increase in the inter-granular thermal stress significantly induced more inter-granular and more trans-granular cracks, for the anisotropic expansion that is linked to the α/β phase transformation of quartz, which is abundant in granite, at 573 • C led to 5% volume growth in quartz [26,27].Griffiths et al. [28] provided a Python-based open source tool for quantifying micro-cracks in the two-dimensional (2D) micro-crack density of granite samples using a newly developed algorithm and suggested that the continued evolution of physical properties at temperatures of 600 • C and above is due to a widening of the existing micro-cracks rather than their formation or propagation.The existence of these pores and cracks doubtlessly affects the permeability of granites [29].Therefore, it is of great significance to quantitatively evaluate the permeability characteristics of granites after high-temperature exposure.
Then, scanning electron microscope (SEM) tests were conducted on the sample granites.Blocks with a size of approximately 8.0 × 8.0 × 5.0 mm 3 were cut from the thermally damaged samples.To achieve a better comparison, SEM was also conducted on the samples at room temperature.Magnifications of 500, 1500, and 5000 were selected in the present study.During the scanning electron microscope observation, we first observed the fracture development from different angles in the sample, and then, the representative points were selected for scanning.Figure 5 shows the typical SEM images of the thermally damaged granites.For T = 25 °C, there exist almost no micro-fractures in the granite.In the range of 200-400 °C, the quantity of the micro-cracks inside and across the aggregates increases slightly.However, as T increases from 400 °C to 800 °C, thermally induced cracks were developed along inter-crystalline boundaries and the surrounding crystals.Both of the cracks opening at the boundaries of aggregates and the number of internal pores in the rock increased greatly (Figure 5e).As analysed by Zhang et al. [24], thermally induced cracks are the result of strong bound water loss, dihydroxylation loss of constituent water, and solid mineral expansion in the temperature range of 100-500 °C.Intra-granular cracks in feldspar and quartz crystal appeared successively at temperatures higher than the second threshold, 573 °C [18].During the heating process, physical properties present significant changes at the temperature of about 573 °C, where the α-β transition occurs.Inner cracks extend quickly and the porosity increases, leading to a reduction of the density and an increase of the conductivity [25].It is presumed that the increase in the inter-granular thermal stress significantly induced more inter-granular and more trans-granular cracks, for the anisotropic expansion that is linked to the α/β phase transformation of quartz, which is abundant in granite, at 573 °C led to 5% volume growth in quartz [26,27].Griffiths et al. [28] provided a Python-based open source tool for quantifying micro-cracks in the two-dimensional (2D) micro-crack density of granite samples using a newly developed algorithm and suggested that the continued evolution of physical properties at temperatures of 600 °C and above is due to a widening of the existing micro-cracks rather than their formation or propagation.The existence of these pores and cracks doubtlessly affects the permeability of granites [29].Therefore, it is of great significance to quantitatively evaluate the permeability characteristics of granites after high-temperature exposure.

Fluid Flow Behaviours of Granites after High-Temperature Exposure
For all of the test cases, as the pressure gradient dP s /dL increases, the volume flow rate Q flowing out of the sample shows an increasing trend.The relations between dP s /dL and Q can be well described using a zero-intercept linear function, and are shown by the solid lines in Figure 6, in which L denotes the length of the sample.From Figure 6, the correlation coefficients or the R 2 values are all larger than 0.99, indicating that the linear Darcy's law fits the raw experimental data very well, and that the fluid flow is laminar.In addition, the increase in p c does not change the linearity of the fluid flow through the samples, but the slopes of the dP s /dL-Q fitting curves become steeper with the increase in p c due to the closure of defects, indicating a higher flow resistance.However, for a given p c , the slopes of the fitting curves show decreases with increases in T.

Fluid Flow Behaviours of Granites after High-Temperature Exposure
For all of the test cases, as the pressure gradient dPs/dL increases, the volume flow rate Q flowing out of the sample shows an increasing trend.The relations between dPs/dL and Q can be well described using a zero-intercept linear function, and are shown by the solid lines in Figure 6, in which L denotes the length of the sample.From Figure 6, the correlation coefficients or the R 2 values are all larger than 0.99, indicating that the linear Darcy's law fits the raw experimental data very well, and that the fluid flow is laminar.In addition, the increase in pc does not change the linearity of the fluid flow through the samples, but the slopes of the dPs/dL-Q fitting curves become steeper with the increase in pc due to the closure of defects, indicating a higher flow resistance.However, for a given pc, the slopes of the fitting curves show decreases with increases in T. 0.0 0.5 (e) 600 °C (Sample CH-05#)   The equivalent permeability is one of the most important parameters to assess the hydraulic properties of fractured rock masses [30,31].Using the linear Darcy's law, the equivalent permeability coefficient K0 of the samples after high-temperature exposure can be calculated using Equation ( 3), and are listed in Table 2: in which μ is the dynamic viscosity, 10 −3 Pa•s, and A0 is the cross-sectional area of the sample, m 2 .Here, the water was assumed to be viscous and incompressible.Variations of K0 as a function of T are displayed in Figure 7.For a given σs, as T increases, all K0 exhibit nonlinear increasing trends, and the variation process can be divided into the following two stages.The equivalent permeability is one of the most important parameters to assess the hydraulic properties of fractured rock masses [30,31].Using the linear Darcy's law, the equivalent permeability coefficient K 0 of the samples after high-temperature exposure can be calculated using Equation (3), and are listed in Table 2: in which µ is the dynamic viscosity, 10 −3 Pa•s, and A 0 is the cross-sectional area of the sample, m 2 .
Here, the water was assumed to be viscous and incompressible.Variations of K 0 as a function of T are displayed in Figure 7.For a given σ s , as T increases, all K 0 exhibit nonlinear increasing trends, and the variation process can be divided into the following two stages.) p c =15MPa, y=6.00010 -19 1.010 x , R 2 =0.9977 p c =20MPa, y=3.68610 -19 1.010 x , R 2 =0.9966 p c =25MPa, y=1.44410 -19 1.011 x , R 2 =0.9988 p c =30MPa, y=8.40910 -20 1.011 x , R 2 =0.9988 .74,4.66, 4.14, and 3.02, respectively.From the SEM results in Figure 5, as T increases from 200 °C to 400 °C, several micro-cracks occur in the granites, but the cracks are not fully developed, which leads to a slight increase in the conductivity of the samples.
From the experimental results that are discussed above, as T increases from 200 °C to 800 °C, variations of K0 against T can be well described using the following exponential function:  =  × 1.01 (4) in which A is a fitting coefficient, m 2 , representing the sensitivity of changes in the permeability coefficient to the confining pressure.
Chen et al. [18] studied the evolution of thermal damage and the permeability of the Beishan granite, and found that the permeability of granite samples after different temperature treatments and under a hydrostatic pressure of 5 MPa can be described using an exponential function (Figure 8).Generally, the evolution characteristics of permeability are consistent with the experimental results that are obtained here in this study.Then, the permeability in Chen et al.'s study as a function of temperature was evaluated using Equation (4).The comparison results are displayed in Figure 8.It shows that the fitting quality using Equation ( 4) is more suitable, with a correlation coefficient R 2 of 0.98.From the experimental results that are discussed above, as T increases from 200 • C to 800 • C, variations of K 0 against T can be well described using the following exponential function: in which A is a fitting coefficient, m 2 , representing the sensitivity of changes in the permeability coefficient to the confining pressure.Chen et al. [18] studied the evolution of thermal damage and the permeability of the Beishan granite, and found that the permeability of granite samples after different temperature treatments and under a hydrostatic pressure of 5 MPa can be described using an exponential function (Figure 8).Generally, the evolution characteristics of permeability are consistent with the experimental results that are obtained here in this study.Then, the permeability in Chen et al.'s study as a function of temperature was evaluated using Equation (4).The comparison results are displayed in Figure 8.It shows that the fitting quality using Equation ( 4) is more suitable, with a correlation coefficient R 2 of 0.98.To evaluate the migration law for fluid in a fractured porous medium, the transmissivity (Ta) was defined [33][34][35].
Combinations of Equations ( 3) and ( 5) yield the following Equation ( 6): in which, Ta is the transmissivity, m 4 .To evaluate the migration law for fluid in a fractured porous medium, the transmissivity (T a ) was defined [33][34][35].
The variations in T a as a function of p c are displayed in Figure 10.As p c increases, T a shows a decrease.However, T a shows an increase with the heating temperature, and the extent of increase gradually increases.For smaller p c values (10, 15 and 20 MPa), T a is sensitive to p c due to pore/crack closure, especially for samples at higher temperature levels.However, for larger p c values, the reduction rate for T a gradually decreases, because the induced cracks that are due to thermal damage generally reach their residual crack apertures.
Processes 2018, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 14 The variations in Ta as a function of pc are displayed in Figure 10.As pc increases, Ta shows a decrease.However, Ta shows an increase with the heating temperature, and the extent of increase gradually increases.For smaller pc values (10,15 and 20 MPa), Ta is sensitive to pc due to pore/crack closure, especially for samples at higher temperature levels.However, for larger pc values, the reduction rate for Ta gradually decreases, because the induced cracks that are due to thermal damage generally reach their residual crack apertures.

Conclusions
From the SEM results, thermal damages, such as micro-cracks and pores, initiate in the granites as a result of high-temperature exposure.As the temperature increases, both the density and the Pwave velocity show degradation.
The relationships between the volume flow rate and the pressure gradient in granite samples after high temperatures at various confining pressures can be well described using Darcy's law.The equivalent permeability coefficients of the samples show an increase with the temperature, and the variation process can be described using the mathematical expression K0 = A × 1.01 T .
As the confining pressure increases, the conductivity of the samples shows a decrease due to crack/pore closure, especially for samples after higher temperature treatment.In the range of confining pressure from 10 MPa to 30 MPa, the transmissivity shows a decrease of 65.12%-85.99%.These results are useful for research and applications that are involved in many areas, such as the disposal of nuclear wastes.

Conclusions
From the SEM results, thermal damages, such as micro-cracks and pores, initiate in the granites as a result of high-temperature exposure.As the temperature increases, both the density and the P-wave velocity show degradation.
The relationships between the volume flow rate and the pressure gradient in granite samples after high temperatures at various confining pressures can be well described using Darcy's law.The equivalent permeability coefficients of the samples show an increase with the temperature, and the variation process can be described using the mathematical expression K 0 = A × 1.01 T .
As the confining pressure increases, the conductivity of the samples shows a decrease due to crack/pore closure, especially for samples after higher temperature treatment.In the range of confining pressure from 10 MPa to 30 MPa, the transmissivity shows a decrease of 65.12%-85.99%.These results are useful for research and applications that are involved in many areas, such as the disposal of nuclear wastes.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the rock permeability test system.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the rock permeability test system.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.Effect of temperature on the decrement ratio of density and P-wave velocity of the tested granites.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Variations of internal porosity of granites with temperature.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.Effect of temperature on the decrement ratio of density and P-wave velocity of the tested granites.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.Effect of temperature on the decrement ratio of density and P-wave velocity of the tested granites.

Figure 4 .Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Variations of internal porosity of granites with temperature.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Variation in the equivalent permeability coefficients of granite samples with temperature.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Variation in the equivalent permeability coefficients of granite samples with temperature.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Evolution of permeability versus heat treatment temperature.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Variations in coefficient A with the confining pressure.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Evolution of permeability versus heat treatment temperature.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Variations in coefficient A with the confining pressure.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Variations in coefficient A with the confining pressure.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Transmissivity as a function of the confining pressure.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Transmissivity as a function of the confining pressure.

Table 1 .
Physical properties of granite samples.

Table 1 .
Physical properties of granite samples.

Table 2 .
Equivalent permeability after different temperature under different confining pressure.

Table 2 .
Equivalent permeability after different temperature under different confining pressure.