Effect of Hot Filament Chemical Vapor Deposition Filament Distribution on Coated Tools Performance in Milling of Zirconia Ceramics

: Zirconia ceramics (ZrO 2 ) have been used for a variety of applications due to their superior physical properties, including in machining tools and dentures. Nonetheless, due to its extreme hardness and brittleness in both sintered and half-sintered forms, zirconia is difﬁcult to machine. In this study, half-sintered zirconia blocks are milled with tungsten carbide milling tools which arecoated with diamond ﬁlm using hot ﬁlament chemical vapor deposition (HFCVD) at various substrate-to-ﬁlament distances. The objective was to determine the effect of substrate-to-ﬁlament distances on the coating thickness, diamond purity, coating grain size, and ZrO 2 machining performance during HFCVD. The experimental results show that, in HFCVD, the grain size and coating thickness of the diamond ﬁlm on milling tools tend to decrease when the substrate-to-ﬁlament distances decrease. Tool failure happened at a cutting time of 200 min for all coated tools. However, the machining quality in terms of surface topology, surface roughness, and tool condition is superior for diamond-coated milling tools with smaller grain sizes and thinner thicknesses. It can be concluded that diamond milling tools with a smaller grain size and lesser thickness produced under shorter substrate-to-ﬁlament distances have a superior machining performance and a longer tool life. This study could potentially be used for parameter optimization in the production of coated tools.


Introduction
Zirconia (ZrO 2 ) is an inorganic, non-metallic material with a low thermal conductivity and high chemical inertness; it is mechanical-wear resistant and electrically conductive [1].Since the mid-1970s, a growing number of nations have increased their efforts and resource allocations into the development of zirconia series products, thereby expanding the functional materials application field of zirconia.As a result of this continuous investment and innovation into zirconia ceramics, it has become one of the highest-performance new materials favored by industrial policies in a number of countries and is widely used in our daily tasks and lives.Zirconia ceramics can be used to manufacture a variety of products for industrial applications, such as machining tools [2], dentures [3], and surface coatings [4], as well as the raw material for telecommunication components, etc.
Numerous technologies exist for machining zirconia ceramics, including laser-assisted machining [5] and abrasive machining [6], but the processing cost is relatively high, the processing efficiency is relatively low, and the precision level of the machined surface is remarkably low.Industrial zirconia ceramics are extremely hard and brittle [7], which makes large-scale machining challenging.Due to their typical physical and mechanical properties, zirconia ceramic materials can only be initially processed by grinding them under typical conditions.ZrO 2 is a typical zirconia ceramic material that is brittle, posing the greatest challenge to machining.Principally, there are three distinct types of ZrO 2 : presintered, half-sintered, and fully sintered.Due to its extreme hardness and brittleness, it is nearly impossible to machine fully sintered ZrO 2 using conventional methods [8].Typically, grinding or additional sintering of pre-sintered or partially sintered ZrO 2 is required.Presintered ZrO 2 is significantly softer than other forms of ZrO 2 .In order to obtain observable and quantifiable results, lengthy experiments involving cutting tests are required [9].This study selected half-sintered ZrO 2 as the cutting material used for the experiments.It is softer than fully sintered ZrO 2 and can still be machined using conventional methods such as milling, but its hardness level is significantly higher than pre-sintered materials.Diamondcoated cutting tools made by h filament chemical vapor deposition (HFCVD) have many excellent properties, including high hardness [9], exceptional thermal conductivity [10], and low friction [11], as well as a low expansion coefficient [12], and this coating technology is considerably less expensive and allows for greater flexibility in tool geometry.The diamond-coated tools for zirconia ceramic workpiece machining are anticipated to have a significantly longer tool life and produce a superior machining quality than that of non-coated tools.
Numerous studies have investigated the connection between various parameters and coating performance.Numerous experiments were conducted to determine the effects of the influential factors of HFCVD, such as pretreatment strategies, methane concentration, chamber pressure, and reaction temperature.Due to the vast difference between the filament temperature and the background temperature of the furnace, there is a sharp temperature gradient between the hot filament and the substrate during HFCVD.In addition, because the temperature range for the synthesis of sp 3 carbon bonding is very narrow, a slight change in the substrate-to-filament distance has a significant impact on the purity and surface morphology of the diamond coating.Nevertheless, a clear illustration of the effect of the substrate-to-filament distance on the milling performance of diamond-coated tools on semi-sintered zirconia ceramics is still lacking.Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to determine the relationship between the milling performance of zirconia with HFCVD-coated tools and the substrate-to-filament distance in the HFCVD process.The coating parameters, particularly the substrate-to-filament distance, of an HFCVD-coated tool for milling zirconia are chosen as the main variables within a series of experiments conducted with different cutting parameters.This helps in determining the optimal cutting parameter for various tolerance and application requirements in order to maximize tool life while maintaining the required energy efficiencies and surface finishes.
In this paper, the structure is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces the procedures and mechanisms of HFCVD diamond coating and ZrO 2 .Section 3 illustrates the experimental setup of the HFCVD process and ZrO 2 cutting test.Section 4, explains the results and discussion including the effect that the distance between the substrate and filament had on the grain size, the coating thickness of HFCVD-coated milling tools, the purity of sp 3 carbon within diamond coated milling tools, tool wear, and surface quality.Lastly, Section 5 summarizes and concludes this study.

Decarburization and Cobalt Etching in HFCVD Diamond Coating
Cobalt granules are typically added to the powder metallurgy process in order to bind tungsten carbide rods and tools.This is due to the high solubility of carbon with transition elements such as cobalt during the HFCVD diamond synthesis process; cobalt induces graphitization during the formation of the diamond deposit, reducing the purity of the diamond coating and the adhesion strength between the diamond coating and the tungsten carbide substrate surface [13].Gaseous cobalt diffuses into the diamond coating during the diamond deposition process in HFCVD, increasing the yield of sp 2 bonding (graphite phase) and decreasing the yield of sp 3 bonding.In contrast to deposition on the substrate surface, carbon would diffuse into the cobalt granules in the carbide substrate [14].To prevent or reduce the negative effects of cobalt and carbon diffusion, a series of pretreatments involving Murakami etching and nitric acid etching must be performed prior to the HFCVD process to remove surface and subsurface cobalt.

The Effect of Substrate to Filament Distance in HFCVD Coating Process
HFCVD is widely utilized in industries for diamond synthesis applications.However, there are a number of deposition parameters in HFCVD that have a significant effect on the surface morphology and growth rate of the diamond film.In the HFCVD process, when the concentration of CH 4 near the filament rises due to the flow of methane, the concentration of the methyl radical (CH 3 ) rises, which diffuses onto the surface of the substrate.The CH 3 further reacts with hydrogen ions to produce methanide radicals (CH 2 ) and methylidyne radicals (CH), which ultimately reduce to carbon atoms and are deposited on the substrate to facilitate diamond nucleation and growth.In addition, the increase in CH 4 concentration encourages secondary nucleation, which decreases grain size [15].On the surface of the crystals formed by the initial nucleation, a second nucleus forms, inhibiting their growth.Furthermore, the second nuclei smoothen the surface by filling any surface irregularities [16].This indicates that as methane flow increases, growth rate will increase while grain size will decrease [15,16].
As for the effect of H 2 concentration in the HFCVD process, it is closely related to the concentration of hydrogen ions, which is necessary for receiving the hydrogen ions released during the previously mentioned methane fragmentation.In addition, it eliminates sp 2 carbon, which reduces the yield of graphite and other carbon forms that are not diamonds.When the concentration of H 2 reaches a critical level, the sp 3 carbon will also be etched away at a rate faster than the diamond nucleation and deposition rates, thereby inhibiting the nucleation and growth of diamond crystals [17].
The concentration gradient of CH 3 , CH 2 , and CH decreases with an increasing distance between the substrate and the filament.Therefore, as the substrate approaches the filament, it is exposed to a greater concentration of CH 3 , CH 2 , and CH radicals and a shorter diffusion distance, which increases surface diffusion on the substrate's surface.This improves the growth rate of the diamond film.However, the substrate's temperature increases when it is close to the filament.Since sp 3 carbon can only form within a relatively narrow temperature range, placing the substrate too close to the filament may impede diamond growth.

ZrO 2 Cutting Mechanism
Due to the high hardness of ZrO 2 , the main material removal mechanism of sintered ZrO 2 is focused on its brittle or semi-brittle nature.In addition to removal via brittle fracture mode, ZrO 2 can be removed via plastic deformation under the cutting conditions of a low feed rate and a high spindle speed [18][19][20].
Under the case of micro milling with a ball end mill, the cutting speed, v c , can be calculated using Equation (1) when the value of the inclination angle of the tool axis β is zero (vertical milling), as shown below, where n is the spindle speed, D is the tool diameter and a p is the axial the depth of cut [21] (Figure 1).The chip formation and tool wear during the zirconium micro-milling process are simplified and summarized for clarity in Figure 2. Due to the brittleness of zirconium, the cutting chips of it in micro-milling are discontinuous [22].The tool wear that develops during a process can be divided into three stages, the first stage consists of abrasive and adhesive wear, in which coating dents caused by abrasive wear allow residue materials from the workpiece to adhere to the coating surface [23].The second stage of tool wear is characterized by attrition wear and apparent delamination of coating [24].The indentations formed during the first stage enhance the formation of cracks caused by debonding, resulting in coating delamination.In the third and final stage of tool wear, the coating has completely delaminated, exposing the substrate material and resulting in abrasive wear on the substrate [25] which causes tool failure [26].
Following the cobalt etching of the ball end mills, a seeding procedure was carried out to facilitate the nucleation of diamond during the initial phase of the diamond deposition.The instruments were treated in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min with a 3-6 micron diamond powder ethanol solution, followed by a 30 second treatment with 99 percent ethanol to remove excess diamond powder.The tools were then placed within the HFCVD furnace.The tools were divided into two sets, A and B, with substrate-to-filament distances 10 and 30, respectively.The parameter for HFCVD coating is shown in Table 1.After the HFCVD diamond deposition on the milling tools, the tools performed scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging and Raman analysis to determine their various The chip formation and tool wear during the zirconium micro-milling process are simplified and summarized for clarity in Figure 2. Due to the brittleness of zirconium, the cutting chips of it in micro-milling are discontinuous [22].The tool wear that develops during a process can be divided into three stages, the first stage consists of abrasive and adhesive wear, in which coating dents caused by abrasive wear allow residue materials from the workpiece to adhere to the coating surface [23].The second stage of tool wear is characterized by attrition wear and apparent delamination of coating [24].The indentations formed during the first stage enhance the formation of cracks caused by debonding, resulting in coating delamination.In the third and final stage of tool wear, the coating has completely delaminated, exposing the substrate material and resulting in abrasive wear on the substrate [25] which causes tool failure [26].The chip formation and tool wear during the zirconium micro-milling process are simplified and summarized for clarity in Figure 2. Due to the brittleness of zirconium, the cutting chips of it in micro-milling are discontinuous [22].The tool wear that develops during a process can be divided into three stages, the first stage consists of abrasive and adhesive wear, in which coating dents caused by abrasive wear allow residue materials from the workpiece to adhere to the coating surface [23].The second stage of tool wear is characterized by attrition wear and apparent delamination of coating [24].The indentations formed during the first stage enhance the formation of cracks caused by debonding, resulting in coating delamination.In the third and final stage of tool wear, the coating has completely delaminated, exposing the substrate material and resulting in abrasive wear on the substrate [25] which causes tool failure [26].
Following the cobalt etching of the ball end mills, a seeding procedure was carried out to facilitate the nucleation of diamond during the initial phase of the diamond deposition.The instruments were treated in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min with a 3-6 micron diamond powder ethanol solution, followed by a 30 second treatment with 99 percent ethanol to remove excess diamond powder.The tools were then placed within the HFCVD furnace.The tools were divided into two sets, A and B, with substrate-to-filament distances 10 and 30, respectively.The parameter for HFCVD coating is shown in Table 1.
After the HFCVD diamond deposition on the milling tools, the tools performed scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging and Raman analysis to determine their various

Experimental Setup
Uncoated tungsten carbide ball end mills (diameter: 2 mm, flute length: 12 mm, overall length: 50 mm, outer diameter: 4 mm) were chemically pretreated before HFCVD diamond deposition.The tools were first treated with Murakami solution (85% KOH: 99.5% K 3 [Fe(CN) 6 ]: H 2 O, 1:1:10) to increase surface roughness and improve mechanical interlocking between the substrate and HFCVD-deposited diamond layer.Before the second pretreatment, the instruments were cleaned and dried.The instruments were ultrasonically etched in a 98% HNO:H 2 O, 1:10 solution for cobalt removal.
Following the cobalt etching of the ball end mills, a seeding procedure was carried out to facilitate the nucleation of diamond during the initial phase of the diamond deposition.The instruments were treated in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min with a 3-6 micron diamond powder ethanol solution, followed by a 30 second treatment with 99 percent ethanol to remove excess diamond powder.The tools were then placed within the HFCVD furnace.The tools were divided into two sets, A and B, with substrate-to-filament distances 10 and 30, respectively.The parameter for HFCVD coating is shown in Table 1.After the HFCVD diamond deposition on the milling tools, the tools performed scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging and Raman analysis to determine their various coating properties, such as coating grain size, coating thickness, and the percentage of sp 3 bonds present in the coatings produced.Figure 3 shows the HFCVD machine and related facilities used in this study for the diamond coating of drilling tools.coating properties, such as coating grain size, coating thickness, and the percentage of sp 3 bonds present in the coatings produced.Figure 3 shows the HFCVD machine and related facilities used in this study for the diamond coating of drilling tools.Twelve diamond-coated milling tools (six milling tools from set A and six milling tools from set B) were then used to conduct a series of ZrO2 cutting tests with the following parameters: spindle speed of 22 kprm, feed rates of 100 mm/min and 200 mm/min, cutting times of 200 min, 400 min, and 800 min, and a depth of cut of 0.6 mm.The sample size was 30 mm × 20 mm.Table 2 includes the cutting parameters.After the cutting tests, the ZrO2 workpiece surface was analyzed by an optical profiling system to determine surface roughness and surface profile in order to deduce the cutting quality of coated end mills manufactured under two different substrate-to-filament distances in relation to the different cutting parameters.Twelve diamond-coated milling tools (six milling tools from set A and six milling tools from set B) were then used to conduct a series of ZrO 2 cutting tests with the following parameters: spindle speed of 22 kprm, feed rates of 100 mm/min and 200 mm/min, cutting times of 200 min, 400 min, and 800 min, and a depth of cut of 0.6 mm.The sample size was 30 mm × 20 mm.Table 2 includes the cutting parameters.After the cutting tests, the ZrO 2 workpiece surface was analyzed by an optical profiling system to determine surface roughness and surface profile in order to deduce the cutting quality of coated end mills manufactured under two different substrate-to-filament distances in relation to the different cutting parameters.4, the average grain size of the coating produced using deposition for set B is 9.37 µm, which is considerably larger than the grains produced using deposition for set A, which are only 3.19 µm.In terms of coating thickness, the coating produced using deposition sor set B has an average grain size of 43.56 µm, which is approximately 5.77 µm thicker than the coating produced using deposition for set A. The SEM results indicate that the coating thickness increases as grain size increases.As a result of the growth rate during diamond deposition, the growth rate obtained using deposition for set B is considerably higher than for set A. When coated tools are produced under the coating parameters for set A at a shorter substrate-to-filament distance, the surface of the substrate is exposed to a higher concentration of CH 3 , CH 2 , and CH radicals, the carbon sources for diamond synthesis.This should theoretically increase the growth rate.However, the substrate's temperature increases when it is close to the filament.Due to the fact that sp 3 carbon can only form within a narrow temperature range [27], when the substrate is too close to the filament the substrate temperature would exceed the optimal temperature for diamond synthesis, reducing the growth rate and the coating purity [28], which causes the thinner coating thickness and smaller grain size for the milling tools in set A. In addition, the increased concentration of CH 3 , CH 2 , and CH radicals resulting from the coating parameters of set A promotes secondary nucleation, resulting in a smaller average grain size compared to set B. In conclusion, when the distance between the substrate and the filament decreases in HFCVD processes, the grain size and coating thickness of the diamond film on milling tools become generally smaller and thinner.

The Effects of Distance between Substrate and Filament on Grain Size and Coating Thickness of HFCVD Coated Milling Tools
Figure 1a-d are SEM images of the coating produced using deposition on set A and set B tools, respectively.According to Figure 4, the average grain size of the coating produced using deposition for set B is 9.37 µm, which is considerably larger than the grains produced using deposition for set A, which are only 3.19 µm.In terms of coating thickness, the coating produced using deposition sor set B has an average grain size of 43.56 µm, which is approximately 5.77 µm thicker than the coating produced using deposition for set A. The SEM results indicate that the coating thickness increases as grain size increases.As a result of the growth rate during diamond deposition, the growth rate obtained using deposition for set B is considerably higher than for set A. When coated tools are produced under the coating parameters for set A at a shorter substrate-to-filament distance, the surface of the substrate is exposed to a higher concentration of CH3, CH2, and CH radicals, the carbon sources for diamond synthesis.This should theoretically increase the growth rate.However, the substrate's temperature increases when it is close to the filament.Due to the fact that sp 3 carbon can only form within a narrow temperature range [27], when the substrate is too close to the filament the substrate temperature would exceed the optimal temperature for diamond synthesis, reducing the growth rate and the coating purity [28], which causes the thinner coating thickness and smaller grain size for the milling tools in set A. In addition, the increased concentration of CH3, CH2, and CH radicals resulting from the coating parameters of set A promotes secondary nucleation, resulting in a smaller average grain size compared to set B. In conclusion, when the distance between the substrate and the filament decreases in HFCVD processes, the grain size and coating thickness of the diamond film on milling tools become generally smaller and thinner.

The Effects of Distance between Substrate and Filament on the Purity of sp 3 Carbon of Diamond-Coated Milling Tools
Raman spectroscopy is a nondestructive technique for analyzing materials based on the interaction between light and the material.Raman spectroscopy can provide detailed information about the chemical structure, phase and morphology, crystallinity, and molecular interactions of the coated milling tools.Typically, a Raman spectrum comprises a certain number of Raman peaks, each of which represents the wavelength position and intensity of the Raman scattered light corresponding to that peak.For each peak, a particular molecular bond vibration can be identified.
With the Renishaw Micro-Raman Spectroscopy System TM , it is possible to obtain Raman spectrograms of the diamond coating for tools in sets A and B, displaying the intensity distributions of various characteristic peaks as illustrated in Figures 5 and 6, respectively.Multiple peak fitting based on the Gaussian model clearly demonstrates the composition of the coating, which consists of disordered sp 3 carbon, C-N vibrations, diamond, disordered graphite, distorted sp 3 carbon, graphite, etc.Once all the relevant characteristic peaks have been identified, as shown in Tables 3 and 4 which show the Raman spectra for the peak fitting of diamond-coated milling tools for both sets A and B, the area of integration can be calculated for quantitative analysis.The purity of sp 3 carbon in set A can be calculated to be approximately 98.47 percent when sp 2 and sp 3 carbon are added together.In contrast, the sp 3 purity of set B exceeds 99 percent.Comparing the sp 3 proportion results, one can conclude that for an increase in the distance between the substrate and the filament in a HFCVD process, the purity of the sp 3 carbon in the diamond-coated milling tools is improved.

The Effects of Distance between Substrate and Filament on the Purity of sp 3 Carbon of Diamond-Coated Milling Tools
Raman spectroscopy is a nondestructive technique for analyzing materials based on the interaction between light and the material.Raman spectroscopy can provide detailed information about the chemical structure, phase and morphology, crystallinity, and molecular interactions of the coated milling tools.Typically, a Raman spectrum comprises a certain number of Raman peaks, each of which represents the wavelength position and intensity of the Raman scattered light corresponding to that peak.For each peak, a particular molecular bond vibration can be identified.
With the Renishaw Micro-Raman Spectroscopy System TM , it is possible to obtain Raman spectrograms of the diamond coating for tools in sets A and B, displaying the intensity distributions of various characteristic peaks as illustrated in Figures 5 and 6, respectively.Multiple peak fitting based on the Gaussian model clearly demonstrates the composition of the coating, which consists of disordered sp 3 carbon, C-N vibrations, diamond, disordered graphite, distorted sp 3 carbon, graphite, etc.Once all the relevant characteristic peaks have been identified, as shown in Tables 3 and 4 which show the Raman spectra for the peak fitting of diamond-coated milling tools for both sets A and B, the area of integration can be calculated for quantitative analysis.The purity of sp 3 carbon in set A can be calculated to be approximately 98.47 percent when sp 2 and sp 3 carbon are added together.In contrast, the sp 3 purity of set B exceeds 99 percent.Comparing the sp 3 proportion results, one can conclude that for an increase in the distance between the substrate and the filament in a HFCVD process, the purity of the sp 3 carbon in the diamond-coated milling tools is improved.

The Effects of Distance between Substrate and Filament on Tool Wear
The progression of tool wear for a diamond-coated tool during milling includes the adhesive wear, delamination of coated materials, tool breakage/loss of tools, and the geometry of the coated and substrate materials, according to the cutting mechanism of a diamond-coated tool [29].High cutting temperature causes a continuous adhesion of workpiece materials, to the rake and flank faces of the cutting tool at first.As a result, the relief angle of the cutting edge decreases, and the cutting motion changes to plowing and rubbing.Abrasive wear increases as a result of the constant compression stress, friction heat, and high cutting temperature.During continuous cutting, delamination occurs along the cutting edge of a coated tool, exposing the sharp edge of the tool substrate.The wear process may include graphitization in the diamond at high cutting temperatures, as well as attrition in columnar diamond grains.As a result of the constant cutting, the exposed tungsten carbide edge quickly wore away.This results in a variation in the tool geometry, rounding of the cutting edge, and tool breakage.
A similar logic is applied to the ball end mill conditions in this study.Figure 7 illustrates SEM images of ball end mills from sets A and B, which the cutting time is 200 min.According to Figure 7, an end mill tool edge from set A shows a shiny surface on the drilling edges, indicating that the tungsten carbide substrate has already been exposed; however, it is not yet to the stage of tool breakage.For the end mill tool edge of set B, however, the tool breakage has already occurred at the same cutting time as the drilling tool of set A. As shown in Figure 7b, a variation in the tool geometry has been observed on the drilling edge.As a result, under the same cutting conditions, the drilling tool of set B has tool breakage, whereas the end mill tool of set A is still in the delamination stage, demonstrating that the tool wear level of set A is lower than that of set B. The aforementioned testing results demonstrated that the milling tools of set B have already failed at 200 min of cutting, but the milling tools of set A are still able to continue cutting.

The Effects of Distance between Substrate and Filament on Tool Wear
The progression of tool wear for a diamond-coated tool during milling includes the adhesive wear, delamination of coated materials, tool breakage/loss of tools, and the geometry of the coated and substrate materials, according to the cutting mechanism of a diamond-coated tool [29].High cutting temperature causes a continuous adhesion of workpiece materials, to the rake and flank faces of the cutting tool at first.As a result, the relief angle of the cutting edge decreases, and the cutting motion changes to plowing and rubbing.Abrasive wear increases as a result of the constant compression stress, friction heat, and high cutting temperature.During continuous cutting, delamination occurs along the cutting edge of a coated tool, exposing the sharp edge of the tool substrate.The wear process may include graphitization in the diamond at high cutting temperatures, as well as attrition in columnar diamond grains.As a result of the constant cutting, the exposed tungsten carbide edge quickly wore away.This results in a variation in the tool geometry, rounding of the cutting edge, and tool breakage.
A similar logic is applied to the ball end mill conditions in this study.Figure 7 illustrates SEM images of ball end mills from sets A and B, which the cutting time is 200 min.According to Figure 7, an end mill tool edge from set A shows a shiny surface on the drilling edges, indicating that the tungsten carbide substrate has already been exposed; however, it is not yet to the stage of tool breakage.For the end mill tool edge of set B, however, the tool breakage has already occurred at the same cutting time as the drilling tool of set A. As shown in Figure 7b, a variation in the tool geometry has been observed on the drilling edge.As a result, under the same cutting conditions, the drilling tool of set B has tool breakage, whereas the end mill tool of set A is still in the delamination stage, demonstrating that the tool wear level of set A is lower than that of set B. The aforementioned testing results demonstrated that the milling tools of set B have already failed at 200 min of cutting, but the milling tools of set A are still able to continue cutting.

Influence of Distance between Substrate and Filament on Surface Quality
Table 5 summarized the surface roughness of milled surfaces by diamond-coated milling tools for sets A and B. Figure 8 indicates that a higher feed rate (200 mm/min) in milling of zirconia ceramic using diamond-coated milling tools results in a lower average surface roughness value, particularly when the cutting time is at 200 min.This is because

Influence of Distance between Substrate and Filament on Surface Quality
Table 5 summarized the surface roughness of milled surfaces by diamond-coated milling tools for sets A and B. Figure 8 indicates that a higher feed rate (200 mm/min) in milling of zirconia ceramic using diamond-coated milling tools results in a lower average surface roughness value, particularly when the cutting time is at 200 min.This is because larger grain size experiences more severe friction, thus experiences more wear under high spindle speed [30].Moreover, film cracks tend to propagate through the columnar particles, leading to a decrease in toughness and adhesion.This result is consistent with the tool condition described in Section 4.1, which indicates that set B milling tools failed at 200 min.On the other hand, the reason that set A and set B tools have comparable surface roughness at 800 min is because both sets have experienced significant tool wear as a result of prolonged machining time.larger grain size experiences more severe friction, thus experiences more wear under high spindle speed [30].Moreover, film cracks tend to propagate through the columnar particles, leading to a decrease in toughness and adhesion.This result is consistent with the tool condition described in Section 4.1, which indicates that set B milling tools failed at 200 min.On the other hand, the reason that set A and set B tools have comparable surface roughness at 800 min is because both sets have experienced significant tool wear as a result of prolonged machining time.To comprehend the effect of substrate-to-filament distance on the cutting quality of coated end mills under different cutting parameters, it is necessary to examine the average surface roughness.Figure 9 indicates that a higher feed rate (200 mm/min) results in a lower surface roughness value for both set A and B diamond-coated milling tools, particularly when the cutting time is 400 min.Comparing the surface produced by set A and set B, the surface roughness of the machined surface of a diamond-coated milling tool from set B is significantly higher than that of a tool from set A due to the larger grain size, which causes the individual grains and the coating to experience a higher level of stress during the milling process.As mentioned above, under the larger microcrystalline diamond (MCD) structure, film cracks propagate through the columnar particles; a thicker coating has longer columnar particles which further enhance crack propagation, reducing the adhesion and toughness of the coating [31].However, for a smaller grain size coating such as the diamond coating produced using deposition for set A, the structure is less continuous, thus reducing crack propagation.In addition, tool wear increases with the grain size [29] and the substrate material, tungsten carbide, is brittle, resulting in the accumulation of internal stress along the coating, interlayer, and substrate subsurface.This causes tool delamination and even abrasive wear, resulting in severe tool wear or even the failure of the diamond-coated milling tools of set B. At 800 min, both set A and set B tools had a To comprehend the effect of substrate-to-filament distance on the cutting quality of coated end mills under different cutting parameters, it is necessary to examine the average surface roughness.Figure 9 indicates that a higher feed rate (200 mm/min) results in a lower surface roughness value for both set A and B diamond-coated milling tools, particularly when the cutting time is 400 min.Comparing the surface produced by set A and set B, the surface roughness of the machined surface of a diamond-coated milling tool from set B is significantly higher than that of a tool from set A due to the larger grain size, which causes the individual grains and the coating to experience a higher level of stress during the milling process.As mentioned above, under the larger microcrystalline diamond (MCD) structure, film cracks propagate through the columnar particles; a thicker coating has longer columnar particles which further enhance crack propagation, reducing the adhesion and toughness of the coating [31].However, for a smaller grain size coating such as the diamond coating produced using deposition for set A, the structure is less continuous, thus reducing crack propagation.In addition, tool wear increases with the grain size [29] and the substrate material, tungsten carbide, is brittle, resulting in the accumulation of internal stress along the coating, interlayer, and substrate subsurface.This causes tool delamination and even abrasive wear, resulting in severe tool wear or even the failure of the diamond-coated milling tools of set B. At 800 min, both set A and set B tools had a similar surface roughness distribution, as both sets had already experienced significant tool wear and failure.Figure 10 shows the surface topology of the surface machined with set A and B diamond milling tools at a feed rate of 100 mm/min and 200 mm/min for 200 min, 400 min and 800 min, respectively.Due to peeling of the zirconia ceramic surface in milling, the machined surfaces produced by set B diamond-coated milling tools exhibit numerous micro-voids and cavities, which are evenly distributed on the machined surface.The microvoid on the machined surface is a typical surface defect that appeared during tool milling with a diamond-coated tool.These voids can serve as sites for crack initiation, leading to the collapse of near-surface cavities and the initiation and propagation of cracks along grain boundaries [32].As a result, a network of various voids is found on the surface which causes stress concentration on the machined surfaces, which in turn affects the mechanical properties of components made with a diamond-coated milling zirconia surface.As mentioned above, the larger grain size and thicker coating of set B diamond-coated tools promote crack propagation and mean that they experience a larger internal stress which leads to tool failure and reduces the cutting quality.In conclusion, the diamondcoated milling tool from set A produces a surface with fewer surface defects.In conjunction with the results and justification of surface roughness in Sections 4.2 and 4.3, it can be concluded that a diamond-coated tool with an appropriately thin coating thickness and finer grain size produces a machined surface with a higher quality, and that a shorter substrate-to-filament distance will produce a surface with higher quality on zirconia ceramics.Figure 10 shows the surface topology of the surface machined with set A and B diamond milling tools at a feed rate of 100 mm/min and 200 mm/min for 200 min, 400 min and 800 min, respectively.Due to peeling of the zirconia ceramic surface in milling, the machined surfaces produced by set B diamond-coated milling tools exhibit numerous micro-voids and cavities, which are evenly distributed on the machined surface.The microvoid on the machined surface is a typical surface defect that appeared during tool milling with a diamond-coated tool.These voids can serve as sites for crack initiation, leading to the collapse of near-surface cavities and the initiation and propagation of cracks along grain boundaries [32].As a result, a network of various voids is found on the surface which causes stress concentration on the machined surfaces, which in turn affects the mechanical properties of components made with a diamond-coated milling zirconia surface.As mentioned above, the larger grain size and thicker coating of set B diamond-coated tools promote crack propagation and mean that they experience a larger internal stress which leads to tool failure and reduces the cutting quality.In conclusion, the diamond-coated milling tool from set A produces a surface with fewer surface defects.In conjunction with the results and justification of surface roughness in Sections 4.2 and 4.3, it can be concluded that a diamond-coated tool with an appropriately thin coating thickness and finer grain size produces a machined surface with a higher quality, and that a shorter substrate-to-filament distance will produce a surface with higher quality on zirconia ceramics.
Processes 2023, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW

Conclusions
In this work, half-sintered zirconia blocks are milled using tungsten carbid tools coated by varied substrate-to-filament distances in HFCVD.The goal is to in the influence of substrate-to-filament distance in an HFCVD process on coating g coating thickness, diamond purity, and ZrO2 machinability.This research imp

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Three main stages of tool wear (a) stage 1: adhesive and abrasive wear, (b) attrition wear and delamination, (c) substrate material breakage.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Three main stages of tool wear (a) stage 1: adhesive and abrasive wear, (b) attrition wear and delamination, (c) substrate material breakage.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Three main stages of tool wear (a) stage 1: adhesive and abrasive wear, (b) attrition wear and delamination, (c) substrate material breakage.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.The HFCVD and the related facilities for diamond coating of drilling tools, (a) overall installation of HFCVD facilities, (b) inner view of HFCVD reaction chamber.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.The HFCVD and the related facilities for diamond coating of drilling tools, (a) overall installation of HFCVD facilities, (b) inner view of HFCVD reaction chamber.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. SEM images of diamond-coated tools produced by HFCVD under set A (a) grain size, (b) coating thickness, and set B (c) grain size, (d) coating thickness.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. SEM images of diamond-coated tools produced by HFCVD under set A (a) grain size, (b) coating thickness, and set B (c) grain size, (d) coating thickness.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Raman spectrum for peak fitting of diamond-coated milling tools of set A.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Raman spectrum peak fitting of diamond-coated milling tools of set B.

Figure 5 . 20 Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Raman spectrum for peak fitting of diamond-coated milling tools of set A.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Raman spectrum peak fitting of diamond-coated milling tools of set B.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Raman spectrum peak fitting of diamond-coated milling tools of set B.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. SEM images of drilling tools from (a) set A, and (b) set B, for cutting time 200 min.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. SEM images of drilling tools from (a) set A, and (b) set B, for cutting time 200 min.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Surface roughness vs. cutting time for sets A and B diamond milling tools (a) at feed rate 100 mm/min and, (b) 200 mm/min.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Surface roughness vs. cutting time for sets A and B diamond milling tools (a) at feed rate 100 mm/min and, (b) 200 mm/min.

Processes 2023 ,
11,  x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 20 similar surface roughness distribution, as both sets had already experienced significant tool wear and failure.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Surface roughness against cutting time at 100 mm/min and 200 mm/min feed rates (a) set A diamond milling tools and, (b) set B diamond milling tools.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Surface roughness against cutting time at 100 mm/min and 200 mm/min feed rates (a) set A diamond milling tools and, (b) set B diamond milling tools.
4. Result and Discussion4.1.The Effects of Distance between Substrate and Filament on Grain Size and Coating Thickness of HFCVD Coated Milling ToolsFigure 1a-d are SEM images of the coating produced using deposition on set A and set B tools, respectively.According to Figure

Table 3 .
Integration results for peak fitting of diamond-coated milling tools of set A.

Table 3 .
Integration results for peak fitting of diamond-coated milling tools of set A.

Table 4 .
Integration result for peak fitting of diamond-coated milling tools of set B.

Table 3 .
Integration results for peak fitting of diamond-coated milling tools of set A.

Table 4 .
Integration result for peak fitting of diamond-coated milling tools of set B.

Table 5 .
Surface roughness of milled surfaces by diamond-coated milling tools for sets A and B.

Table 5 .
Surface roughness of milled surfaces by diamond-coated milling tools for sets A and B.