Effective Perturbations on the Amplitude and Hysteresis of Erg-Mediated Potassium Current Caused by 1-Octylnonyl 8-[(2-hydroxyethyl)[6-oxo-6(undecyloxy)hexyl]amino]-octanoate (SM-102), a Cationic Lipid

SM-102 (1-octylnonyl 8-[(2-hydroxyethyl)[6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy)hexyl]amino]-octanoate) is an amino cationic lipid that has been tailored for the formation of lipid nanoparticles and it is one of the essential ingredients present in the ModernaTM COVID-19 vaccine. However, to what extent it may modify varying types of plasmalemmal ionic currents remains largely uncertain. In this study, we investigate the effects of SM-102 on ionic currents either in two types of endocrine cells (e.g., rat pituitary tumor (GH3) cells and mouse Leydig tumor (MA-10) cells) or in microglial (BV2) cells. Hyperpolarization-activated K+ currents in these cells bathed in high-K+, Ca2+-free extracellular solution were examined to assess the effects of SM-102 on the amplitude and hysteresis of the erg-mediated K+ current (IK(erg)). The SM-102 addition was effective at blocking IK(erg) in a concentration-dependent fashion with a half-maximal concentration (IC50) of 108 μM, a value which is similar to the KD value (i.e., 134 μM) required for its accentuation of deactivation time constant of the current. The hysteretic strength of IK(erg) in response to the long-lasting isosceles-triangular ramp pulse was effectively decreased in the presence of SM-102. Cell exposure to TurboFectinTM 8.0 (0.1%, v/v), a transfection reagent, was able to inhibit hyperpolarization-activated IK(erg) effectively with an increase in the deactivation time course of the current. Additionally, in GH3 cells dialyzed with spermine (30 μM), the IK(erg) amplitude progressively decreased; moreover, a further bath application of SM-102 (100 μM) or TurboFectin (0.1%) diminished the current magnitude further. In MA-10 Leydig cells, the IK(erg) was also blocked by the presence of SM-102 or TurboFectin. The IC50 value for SM-102-induced inhibition of IK(erg) in MA-10 cells was 98 μM. In BV2 microglial cells, the amplitude of the inwardly rectifying K+ current was inhibited by SM-102. Taken together, the presence of SM-102 concentration-dependently inhibited IK(erg) in endocrine cells (e.g., GH3 or MA-10 cells), and such action may contribute to their functional activities, assuming that similar in vivo findings exist.

The erg-mediated K + current (I K(erg) ) is recognized to be encoded by three different subfamilies of the KCNH gene, which can give rise to the pore-forming α-subunit of ergmediated K + (i.e., K erg or K V 11) channels [15,16]. This type of ionic currents is regarded as constituting the cloned counterpart of the rapidly activating delayed-rectifying K + currents enriched in heart cells, and the KCNH2 gene encodes the pore-forming α-subunit of the voltage-gated K + channels, K V 11.1, commonly referred to as hERG [15,16]. The I K(erg) is inherent in neurons or different types of electrically excitable cells, such as endocrine and neuroendocrine cells, and it can potentially affect the maintenance of the resting potential and the modifications in the subthreshold excitability [15,[17][18][19][20]. Previous work has also noticeably demonstrated the ability of I K(erg) 's magnitude to regulate tumor cell apoptosis and proliferation [21]. However, whether or how the presence of SM-102 or other structurally similar compounds produces any modifications on the magnitude in this type of K + currents is largely uncertain.
Previous reports have shown that pituitary cells (e.g., GH 3 cells), in addition to the presence of voltage-gated K + currents, exhibit I K(erg) with an inwardly rectifying property. This type of ionic current was characterized by voltage-dependent activation and was proposed to be an important determinant of the resting membrane potential and, therefore, of cell excitability [17,18,22]. The resultant perturbations in this K V channel activity also have the propensity to modify the stimulus-secretion coupling in these cells [18].
In view of the foregoing considerations, the following attempts were undertaken to evaluate how SM-102 or other relevant compounds (e.g., TurboFectin TM ) could result in any modifications of ionic currents (e.g., erg-mediated K + current (I K[erg] )) in pituitary tumor (GH 3 ) cells. Spermine is known to be a polyamine and polycationic compound which can suppress the inwardly rectifying properties of the inward rectifier K + current (I K(IR) ), while TurboFectin TM is a proprietary mixture of a broad-spectrum protein/polyamine with histones and lipids which is known to be a transfection reagent. Similar to SM-102, they are polyamine groups with cationic properties. Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated a pertinent link of I K(erg) to cellular apoptosis or proliferation. We decided to investigate the possible action of SM-102 on another type of endocrine cells (i.e., MA-10 Leydig cells). Findings from the present observations enable us to point out that I K(erg) inherent in different cell types could be an important target through which SM-102 or TurboFectin TM can act to influence the functional activities of the cells involved.

Electrophysiological Measurements
On the day of the measurements, we dispersed cells with a 1% trypsin-EDTA solution, and a few drops of cell suspension were rapidly placed in a custom-made chamber firmly affixed on the stage of an inverted DM-II microscope (Leica; Major Instruments, Kaohsiung, Taiwan). Cells were allowed to be immersed at room temperature (20-25 • C) in normal Tyrode's solution, the composition of which was detailed above, and they were allowed to settle on the chamber's bottom before the measurements were performed. The patch pipettes were prepared from Kimax-51 borosilicate glass tubing (#34500; Kimble, Dogger, New Taipei City, Taiwan) using a vertical electrode puller (PP-830; NARISHIGE, Major Instruments, Tainan, Taiwan). The recording electrodes used had a tip diameter of 1 µM and a resistance of 3-5 MΩ. During the recordings, they were mounted in an air-tight holder, which had a suction port on the side, and a chloride silver wire was used to make contact with the internal electrode solution. We recorded varying types of ionic currents in the whole-cell mode of a modified patch-clamp technique with dynamic adaptive suction (i.e., a decremental change in suction negative pressure in response to progressive increase in the seal resistance) with the aid of either an Axoclamp-2B (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1367 4 of 17 CA, USA) or an RK-400 amplifier (BioLogic, Claix, France), as described elsewhere [18,27]. This procedure was allowed to increase the success rate of gigaseal formation as well as to reduce loss of the gigaseal in long-term recordings. For whole-cell current recordings, following seal formation (>1 GΩ), cell membrane was, thereafter, ruptured by gentle suction. The liquid junction potentials, that arose when the composition of the pipette solution differed from that in the bath, were zeroed shortly before seal formation was created, and the whole-cell data were corrected.

Whole-Cell Current Recordings
The signals were monitored and stored online at 10 kHz in an ASUS ExpertBook laptop computer (P2451F; ASUS, Tainan, Taiwan) equipped with a Digidata 1440A interface (Molecular Devices). During the measurements with analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog conversion, the latter device was operated using pCLAMP 10.6 software (Molecular Devices) ran under Microsoft Windows 7 (Redmond, WA, USA). The laptop computer was placed on the top of an adjustable Cookskin stand (Ningbo, Zhejiang, China) to allow efficient manipulation during the operation. Through digital-to-analog conversion, the voltage-clamp protocols with varying rectangular commands or voltage ramp waveforms (i.e., piecewise linear voltage versus time) were specifically designed and suited for determining the steady-state or instantaneous relationship of current versus voltage (I-V) and voltage-dependent hysteresis of the current (e.g., I K(erg) ) in GH 3 and MA-10 cells.

Data Analyses
To calculate percentage inhibition of SM-102 on I K(erg) in GH 3 or MA-10 cells, the cells examined were stepped from −10 to −100 mV with a duration of 1 s, the peak amplitude of deactivating I K(erg) during application of SM-102 was compared with the control value (i.e., SM-102 was not present). The concentration-dependent relation of SM-102 on the inhibition of I K(erg) amplitude was properly fitted with the modified Hill equation. That is, where [SM] represents the concentration of SM-102 applied; n H or IC 50 is the Hill coefficient or the concentration required for a 50% inhibition of I K(erg) , respectively; E max is SM-102induced maximal inhibited of I K(erg) amplitude. This equation reliably converged to produce the best-fit line and parameter estimates in Figure 2D. The time-dependent rate constant of blocking (k +1 *) or unblocking (k −1 ) was determined from the deactivation time constants (τ deact ) of I K(erg) activated by the long hyperpolarizing pulses from −10 to −90 mV. The τ deact value achieved in the control period (i.e., SM-102 was not present) or during cell exposure to different concentrations of SM-102 was determined by fitting the trajectory of each current trace with a single exponential function. Because a Hill coefficient of about 1 was obtained according to the concentration-response curve, the blocking or unblocking rate constant was further estimated using the relation: where [SM] is the SM-102 concentration used, and k +1 * or k −1 , respectively, result from the slope and the y-axis intercept at [SM] = 0 of the liner regression in situations where the reciprocal time constants of I K(erg) deactivation (i.e., 1/τ deact ) versus different SM-102 concentrations were derived.

Curve-Fitting Procedures and Statistical Analyses
Curve fitting (linear or non-linear (e.g., exponential or sigmoidal fitting)) to experimental data sets was carried out with the goodness of fit by using various maneuvers, such as Microsoft "Solver" add-in function embedded in Excel TM 2019 (Microsoft ® ) ran under Office 365 ® (Microsoft ® ) and 64-bit OriginPro ® 2016 program (OriginLab; Scientific Formosa, Kaohsiung, Taiwan). The data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), with sample sizes (n) indicating the number of GH 3 or HL-1 cells from which the data were collected. The Student's t-test (paired or unpaired) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were utilized for statistical analyses; however, as the difference among different groups was necessarily evaluated, post hoc Duncan's multiple-range comparisons were further exploited. Moreover, assuming that normality underlying ANOVA was violated, a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used. Differences between the values were considered significant when p < 0.05.

Effect of SM-102 on Erg-Mediated K + Current (I K(erg) ) Measured from GH 3 Cells
In the first stage of the whole-cell current recordings, we measured the possible effects of SM-102 on the amplitude of I K(erg) activated by long-lasting step hyperpolarization with a duration of 1 s. During the measurements, we kept cells immersed in high-K + , Ca 2+ -free solution in which 1 µM tetrodotoxin (TTX) and 0.5 mM CdCl 2 were contained, and the recording electrode was filled up with a K + -containing solution. The compositions in these solutions were stated in Materials and Methods. As demonstrated in Figure 2A, a family of large inward currents on the 1 s step hyperpolarization from −10 to −90 mV could be robustly detected in these cells. Such a hyperpolarizing voltage pulse was noticed to elicit an instantaneous current followed by a voltage-and time-dependent decay of the K + inward current, as reported elsewhere [17,20,28]. This type of ionic current, which was effectively inhibited by either E-4031 or glyceryl nonivamide (GLNVA), has been identified to be an erg-mediated K + current (I K(erg) ) [17,18,20,29]. For example, 1 min after GH 3 were exposed to 10 µM E-4031, the peak or sustained I K(erg) , respectively, decreased to 42 ± 6 or 21 ± 8 pA (n = 7) from control values of 177 ± 42 or 49 ± 9 pA (n = 7). Meanwhile, the presence of 10 µM GLNVA resulted in a reduction in the peak or sustained I K(erg) from 173 ± 39 or 47 ± 8 pA (n = 7) to 48 ± 7 or 23 ± 8 pA (n = 7), respectively. Moreover, 1 min after GH 3 cells were exposed to SM-102 at a concentration of 100 or 300 µM, the peak (i.e., initial) or sustained (i.e., end-pulse) component of deactivating I K(erg) evoked by a long hyperpolarizing pulse from −10 to −90 mV was progressively depressed. Figure 1 illustrates the time course of the SM-102-induced inhibition of peak I K(erg) . For example, as the rectangular voltage step from −10 to −90 mV with a duration of 1 s was delivered to the examined cell (indicated in the inset of Figure 2A) to activate I K(erg) , the application of 300 µM SM-102 was noticed to result in a conceivable reduction in the peak or sustained amplitude of I K(erg) to 119 ± 34 or 22 ± 4 pA (n = 8, p < 0.05) from control values of 174 ± 43 or 46 ± 7 pA (n = 8), respectively. After a washout of SM-102, the initial I K(erg) was reversed to 169 ± 39 pA (n = 7). Furthermore, as cells were exposed E-4031 (10 µM) alone, the peak amplitude of I K(erg) evoked by the same voltage-clamp protocol was almost abolished, as evidenced by a reduction in the current amplitude to 19 ± 4 pA (n = 7, p < 0.01) from a control value of 171 ± 41 pA (n = 7). Similar inhibitory effects on I K(erg) in GH 3 cells were obtained as cells were exposed to 10 µM GLNVA alone.

Concentration-Dependent Analysis of SM-102-Mediated Inhibition of I K(erg) in GH 3 Cells
The biophysical properties of I K(erg) elicited by step hyperpolarization in the presence of different SM-102 concentrations tended to display a concentration-dependent increase in the deactivation rate of the current (Figure 2A,B). In other words, under our experimental conditions, as such a population of erg-mediated K + (K erg ) channels was perturbed by the presence of SM-102, the current flowing through those channels would change (or relax) over time to a new equilibrium level at a rate which may reflect the underlying kinetics of the channels. For these reasons, we further evaluated the detailed kinetics of the SM-102induced inhibition of I K(erg) recorded from GH 3 cells. The concentration-dependence of the decay in deactivating I K(erg) caused by SM-102 is illustrated in Figure 2A,B. Although the initial component of deactivating I K(erg) elicited by a hyperpolarizing pulse from −10 to −90 mV mildly decreased during cell exposure to SM-102, its inhibitory effects on I K(erg) were noticed to be a concentration-dependent increase in the rate of current deactivation together with a reduction in the residual, steady-state current. For example, as cells were 1 s hyperpolarized from −10 to −90 mV, the deactivation time constant (τ deact ) of I K(erg) in the presence of 100 or 300 µM SM-102 was well approximated by a single-exponential with the value of 84.9 ± 9.4 or 45.9 ± 8.7 ms (n = 9), respectively ( Figure 2C). As such, increasing SM-102 concentration noticeably, not only reduced the peak component of I K(erg) , but it also had the propensity to enhance the apparent deactivation rate of the current. The results enabled us to reflect that the inhibitory effect of SM-102 on I K(erg) in GH 3 cells could be reasonably accounted for by a state-dependent block in situations where it had an interaction particularly at the open state of the channel. Moreover, according to the reaction binding scheme, the blocking or unblocking rate constant of current decay in the presence of SM-102 was calculated to be 0.0503 s −1 µM −1 or 6.753 s −1 , respectively; the K D (k −1 /k +1 *) for the SM-102-mediated increase in the deactivation rate of the current was well approximated to be 134.3 µM, a value that was nearly identical with its IC 50 value, i.e., 108 µM ( Figure 2D). These results, therefore, strengthened the notion that a concentration-dependent increase by SM-102 in the rate of I K(erg) deactivation in response to a rectangular hyperpolarizing pulse could largely account for the reduction in I K(erg) amplitude detected in GH 3 cells.

Inhibitory Effect of SM-102 on Current versus Voltage (I-V) Relationship of I K(erg)
We continued to investigate the effect of SM-102 on I K(erg) measured at the different levels of membrane potentials. As demonstrated in Figure 3, in the control period (i.e., SM-102 was not present), the currents decayed at a voltage more negative than −60 mV, and current relaxation was noticed to become faster with a greater step hyperpolarization, as reported previously [17,18,20]. Cell exposure to SM-102 at a concentration of 300 µM progressively decreased the amplitude of I K(erg) in response to membrane hyperpolarizations ( Figure 3B,C). The averaged I-V relationship of I K(erg) taken at the beginning or end of hyperpolarizing pulses is illustrated in Figure 3B or Figure 3C, respectively. The current amplitudes in Figure 3B between the absence and presence of 300 µM SM-102 were significantly different at voltages more negative than −80 mV, while those in Figure 3C significantly differed at the voltages more negative than −50 mV. It is important to note here that in addition to a reduction in the initial component of I K(erg) , the I-V relationship of sustained I K(erg) (Figure 3C) was shifted to less negative potentials during exposure to SM-102 (300 µM).
We continued to investigate the effect of SM-102 on IK(erg) measured at the differ levels of membrane potentials. As demonstrated in Figure 3, in the control period ( SM-102 was not present), the currents decayed at a voltage more negative than −60 m and current relaxation was noticed to become faster with a greater s hyperpolarization, as reported previously [17,18,20]. Cell exposure to SM-102 a concentration of 300 μM progressively decreased the amplitude of IK(erg) in response membrane hyperpolarizations ( Figure 3B,C). The averaged I-V relationship of IK(erg) tak at the beginning or end of hyperpolarizing pulses is illustrated in Figure 3B or Figure respectively. The current amplitudes in Figure 3B between the absence and presence 300 μM SM-102 were significantly different at voltages more negative than −80 mV, wh those in Figure 3C significantly differed at the voltages more negative than −50 mV. I important to note here that in addition to a reduction in the initial component of IK(erg), I-V relationship of sustained IK(erg) ( Figure 3C) was shifted to less negative potent during exposure to SM-102 (300 μM). In these experiments, cells were allowed to be bathed in high-Ca 2+ -free solution containing 1 μM TTX and 0.5 mM CdCl2 and we filled up the electro by using K + -enriched solution. (A) Representative current traces activated in response various steps (indicated in the uppermost part) from a holding potential of −10 mV. T current traces in the upper part are controls (i.e., SM-102 was not present), while those the lower part were obtained as the cell was exposed to 300 μM SM-102. (B) and indicate the averaged I-V relationships of IK(erg) taken at the beginning and end poin each hyperpolarizing pulse, respectively. ■ : control; ○ : in the presence of 300 μ SM-102. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 9-10). * shown in (B) and (C) indic the significant difference from control currents (p < 0.05) measured at the same leve the voltage. The statistical analyses were undertaken by ANOVA-2 for repea measures, P (factor 1, groups among data taken at different level of membrane potent < 0.05, p (factor 2, groups between the absence and presence of SM-102) < 0.05 (interaction) < 0.05, followed by post hoc Duncan's multiple-range test, p < 0.05).

Effect of SM-102 on Voltage-Dependent Hysteresis of IK(erg)
The voltage-dependent hysteresis of IK(erg) has been previously characterized in G cells [28,29], and the hysteretic strength of different types of ionic currents has b recently disclosed to exercise an important impact on electrical behaviors of electrica excitable cells [29,30,31]. Analyses of hysteretic behavior have proven to be a useful t (A) Representative current traces activated in response to various steps (indicated in the uppermost part) from a holding potential of −10 mV. The current traces in the upper part are controls (i.e., SM-102 was not present), while those in the lower part were obtained as the cell was exposed to 300 µM SM-102. (B,C) indicate the averaged I-V relationships of I K(erg) taken at the beginning and end point of each hyperpolarizing pulse, respectively. : control; : in the presence of 300 µM SM-102. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 9-10). * shown in (B,C) indicate the significant difference from control currents (p < 0.05) measured at the same level of the voltage. The statistical analyses were undertaken by ANOVA-2 for repeated measures, P (factor 1, groups among data taken at different level of membrane potentials) < 0.05, p (factor 2, groups between the absence and presence of SM-102) < 0.05, p (interaction) < 0.05, followed by post hoc Duncan's multiple-range test, p < 0.05).

Effect of SM-102 on Voltage-Dependent Hysteresis of I K(erg)
The voltage-dependent hysteresis of I K(erg) has been previously characterized in GH 3 cells [28,29], and the hysteretic strength of different types of ionic currents has been recently disclosed to exercise an important impact on electrical behaviors of electrically excitable cells [29][30][31]. Analyses of hysteretic behavior have proven to be a useful tool in studies of ion channels [31,32]. Therefore, we next continued to investigate whether or how cell exposure to SM-102 could perturb the hysteretic behavior in response to the isosceles-triangular ramp pulse in GH 3 cells. In these whole-cell recording experiments, the examined cell was voltage-clamped at −10 mV and a set of the upright isosceles-triangular ramp pulses in the range of −110 to 0 mV with a total ramp duration of 3.2 s (or ramp speed of ±0.069 mV/ms) was designed and then applied to it through digital-to-analog conversion ( Figure 4A). In particular, current amplitude elicited by the upsloping (ascending) and downsloping (descending) limbs of the triangular ramp pulse was actually distinguishable. The observations indicated a voltage-dependent hysteresis for the elicitation of I K(erg) , as demonstrated in Figure 4A, on the basis of the relationship of instantaneous I K(erg) versus membrane voltage. Additionally, by adding 100 µM SM-102, I K(erg) activated by the upsloping limb of the long-lasting triangular ramp decreased, to a lesser extent, than that measured from the downsloping limb. For example, in the control period (i.e., SM-102 was not present), I K(erg) at the level of −80 mV elicited upon the upsloping and downsloping ends of triangular ramp pulse were −71 ± 12 and −396 ± 34 pA (n = 8), respectively, the values of which were found to differ significantly between them (p < 0.05). Moreover, in the presence of 100 µM SM-102, the amplitude of ascending and descending I K(erg) at the isopotential level (−80 mV) evidently decreased to −58 ± 10 and −285 ± 31 pA (n = 8, p < 0.05), respectively. Therefore, the magnitude of SM-102-induced I K(erg) inhibition at the upsloping and downsloping limb of such a triangular ramp also differed significantly (p < 0.05). The application of 100 µM SM-102 to cells led to a reduction in I K(erg) amplitude (measured at −80 mV) during the upsloping or downsloping limb of the triangular ramp pulse by about 18% or 28%, respectively. SM-102-induced IK(erg) inhibition at the upsloping and downsloping limb of such a triangular ramp also differed significantly (p < 0.05). The application of 100 μM SM-102 to cells led to a reduction in IK(erg) amplitude (measured at −80 mV) during the upsloping or downsloping limb of the triangular ramp pulse by about 18% or 28%, respectively.
As denoted by the dashed arrows in Figure 4, from a difference in the area (i.e., Δarea) encircled by the hysteretic curves elicited at the ascending (upsloping) and descending (downsloping) direction, we further quantified the degree of the voltage-dependent hysteresis of IK(erg) responding to a 3.2 sec triangular ramp pulse. The hysteretic area of IK(erg) occurring in GH3 cells conceivably decreased in the presence of SM-102. Figure 4B summarizes the data demonstrating effects of SM-102 (100 and 300 μM), TurboFectin TM (i.e., TurboFectin TM 8.0), SM-102 plus PD118057 and TurboFectin TM plus PD118057 on the area taken between these two curves. For example, in addition to its decrease in IK(erg) amplitude, the presence of 100 or 300 μM SM-102 decreased the area responding to the long-lasting triangular ramp, as evidenced by a respective reduction in Δarea to 22.2 ± 4.5 mVˑnA (n = 8, p < 0.05) or 16.3 ± 4.1 mVˑnA (n = 8, p < 0.05) from a control value of 26.1 ± 5.1 mVˑnA. Meanwhile, the addition of TurboFectin TM (0.3 %) was able to decrease the value of Δarea from 26.1 ± 5.1 to 16.5 ± 3.9 mVˑnA (n = 8, p < 0.05). In the continued presence of 300 μM SM-102 or 0.3 % TurboFectin TM , a further application of PD118057 (10 μM) was capable of reversing the hysteretic area decreased by exposure to SM-102 or TurboFectin TM . PD118057 was previously reported to be an activator of IK(erg) [33], while TurboFectin TM is a transfection agent which contains polyamine with histones and lipids (https://www.origene.com/products/others/transfection-reagents/turbofectin). As such, the presence of SM-102 could decrease IK(erg) amplitude in a hysteresis-dependent fashion.  As denoted by the dashed arrows in Figure 4, from a difference in the area (i.e., ∆area) encircled by the hysteretic curves elicited at the ascending (upsloping) and descending (downsloping) direction, we further quantified the degree of the voltage-dependent hysteresis of I K(erg) responding to a 3.2 s triangular ramp pulse. The hysteretic area of I K(erg) occurring in GH 3 cells conceivably decreased in the presence of SM-102. Figure 4B summarizes the data demonstrating effects of SM-102 (100 and 300 µM), TurboFectin TM (i.e., TurboFectin TM 8.0), SM-102 plus PD118057 and TurboFectin TM plus PD118057 on the area taken between these two curves. For example, in addition to its decrease in I K(erg) amplitude, the presence of 100 or 300 µM SM-102 decreased the area responding to the long-lasting triangular ramp, as evidenced by a respective reduction in ∆area to 22.2 ± 4.5 mV nA (n = 8, p < 0.05) or 16.3 ± 4.1 mV nA (n = 8, p < 0.05) from a control value of 26.1 ± 5.1 mV nA. Meanwhile, the addition of TurboFectin TM (0.3%) was able to decrease the value of ∆area from 26.1 ± 5.1 to 16.5 ± 3.9 mV nA (n = 8, p < 0.05). In the continued presence of 300 µM SM-102 or 0.3% TurboFectin TM , a further application of PD118057 (10 µM) was capable of reversing the hysteretic area decreased by exposure to SM-102 or TurboFectin TM . PD118057 was previously reported to be an activator of I K(erg) [33], while TurboFectin TM is a transfection agent which contains polyamine with histones and lipids (https://www.origene.com/products/others/transfection-reagents/turbofectin, assessed on 26 August 2021). As such, the presence of SM-102 could decrease I K(erg) amplitude in a hysteresis-dependent fashion.

Effect of Intracellular Dialysis with SM-102 or Spermine on the Amplitude of I K(erg)
Spermine is known to be a polyamine compound and, under certain pathologic conditions, its intracellular concentration could vary with the metabolic status [34]. As it was enriched in a cell interior, spermine or spermidine has been disclosed to be an endogenous inhibitor of the inwardly rectifying K + current (I K(IR) ) or Ca 2+ -activated K + currents [26,34,35]; we, then, intended to explore whether in GH 3 cells dialyzed with SM-102 or spermine, I K(erg) could be sensitive to being perturbed. In these experiments, when the whole-cell mode was substantially established, the examined cells were voltageclamped at −10 mV, and we applied a downsloping ramp pulse to them. For the initial stage of measurements, we filled up the recording pipet with 140 mM CsCl, as membrane rupture occurred, the consecutive ramp pulse from −10 to −90 mV with a duration of 1 s was applied at 0.01 Hz and, under our experimental conditions, the I K(erg) amplitude at the 20th pulse was almost abolished. Furthermore, as demonstrated in Figure 5A, as cells were dialyzed with 100 µM SM-102, I K(erg), in response to such a downsloping ramp pulse, progressively decreased when the repetitive ramp pulse was applied at a rate of 0.01 Hz. Shortly after the whole-cell mode was established, the current amplitude at the 1st pulse measured at the level of −80 mV was 313 ± 24 pA (n = 8), a value which was significantly different from that at the 20th pulse (i.e., 3 min after drastic membrane rupture) (189 ± 19 pA; n = 8, p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the inwardly rectifying property of the current, which appeared at the voltage ranging between −100 and −70 mV, became progressively evident. However, in control cells (i.e., cells dialyzed without SM-102), the I K(erg) amplitude measured at −80 mV between the 1st and 20th pulses was not noticed to differ significantly (309 ± 23 pA (1st pulse) versus 311 ± 22 pA (20th pulse); n = 8, p > 0.05). Additionally, in cells dialyzed with TurboFectin TM (0.1%) or spermine (30 µM), the amplitude of I K(erg) evoked by such a downsloping ramp pulse gradually diminished ( Figure 5B,C(a-c)). The results of our experiment showed that, as GH 3 cells were continually dialyzed with either SM-102, TurboFectin TM or spermine, the I K(erg) amplitude could be reduced, in combination with the increased inwardly rectifying property of the current.

Effect of SM-102 on IK(erg) Identified in MA-10 Leydig Cells
It was previously demonstrated that some metal cations can influence the testosterone production on in vitro Leydig cells [36]. The magnitude of the voltage-gated K + current (e.g., IK(erg)) has also been disclosed to modify tumor cell apoptosis and proliferation [21,37]. For these reasons, we next investigated whether IK(erg) could be functionally expressed in another type of endocrine cells (i.e., MA-10 cells) and how it was modified by the presence of SM-102. In the measurements similar to those conducted above in GH3 cells, we kept MA-10 cells bathed in high-K + , Ca 2+ -free solution containing 1 μM TTX and 0.5 mM CdCl2, and the recording electrode was filled up with a K + -enriched solution. As demonstrated in Figure 6, the IK(erg) present in MA-10 cells measured at various voltage steps substantially decreased in the presence of 300 μM SM-102. For example, as cells were continually exposed to 300 μM SM-102 and the voltage step from −10 to −110 mV was applied, the IK(erg) taken at the beginning or end pulse of the Figure 5. Effect of intracellular dialysis with SM-102, TurboFectin TM or spermine on I K(erg) in GH 3 cells. In this set of measurements, we filled the recording electrode with an internal solution which contained 100 µM SM-102, 0.1% TurboFectin TM or 30 µM spermine. In (A), as whole-cell mode was established, we applied a 2 s downsloping ramp pulse from −10 to −90 mV at a rate of 0.1 Hz. Inset at the right corner denotes the voltage-clamp protocol applied. In cells dialyzed with 100 µM SM-102, current trace labeled a is the one when the first pulse was applied (i.e., immediately after membrane rupture occurred), while that labeled b or c was obtained at the 10th or 20th pulse, respectively. Of note, there was a progressive decrease in I K(erg) amplitude taken particularly at the voltages between −90 and −50 mV. In (B), cells were dialyzed with 0.1% TurboFectin TM , and the current trace labeled a or b activated by the same ramp pulse in (A) was taken at the 1st or 20th pulse, respectively. (C) Summary bar graph showing effect of intracellular dialysis with 100 µM SM-102 (a), 0.1% TurboFectin TM (b) or 30 µM spermine (c) on I K(erg) amplitude (mean ± SEM; n = 7 for the vertical bar in each panel). Data analysis in (Ca) was performed by ANOVA-1 (p < 0.05), while those in (Cb) and (Cc) were by paired t-test (p < 0.05). *Significantly different from control (i.e., the amplitude taken at the first pulse).

Effect of SM-102 on I K(erg) Identified in MA-10 Leydig Cells
It was previously demonstrated that some metal cations can influence the testosterone production on in vitro Leydig cells [36]. The magnitude of the voltage-gated K + current (e.g., I K(erg) ) has also been disclosed to modify tumor cell apoptosis and proliferation [21,37]. For these reasons, we next investigated whether I K(erg) could be functionally expressed in another type of endocrine cells (i.e., MA-10 cells) and how it was modified by the presence of SM-102. In the measurements similar to those conducted above in GH 3 cells, we kept MA-10 cells bathed in high-K + , Ca 2+ -free solution containing 1 µM TTX and 0.5 mM CdCl 2 , and the recording electrode was filled up with a K + -enriched solution. As demonstrated in Figure 6, the I K(erg) present in MA-10 cells measured at various voltage steps substantially decreased in the presence of 300 µM SM-102. For example, as cells were continually exposed to 300 µM SM-102 and the voltage step from −10 to −110 mV was applied, the I K(erg) taken at the beginning or end pulse of the rectangular hyperpolarizing pulse significantly decreased to 535 ± 69 pA (n = 8, p < 0.05) or 120 ± 24 pA (n = 8, p < 0.05) from the control values of 832 ± 87 pA (n = 8) or 309 ± 44 pA (n = 8), respectively. The averaged I-V relationships for a transient or late component of deactivating I K(erg) taken with and without the addition of SM-102 were, respectively, demonstrated in Figure 6B,C. Current amplitudes in Figure 6B,C between the absence and presence of 300 µM SM-102 significantly differed at the voltages more negative than −60 mV. Moreover, during cell exposure to 300 µM SM-102, the τ deact value of I K(erg) activated from −10 to −110 mV decreased to 106 ± 17 ms from a control value of 312 ± 22 ms. (n = 8, p < 0.05). The IC 50 value required for the SM-102-mediated inhibition of I K(erg) observed in MA-10 cells was estimated to be 98 µM ( Figure 6D). It was reasonable to assume, therefore, that similar to the experimental observations found in GH 3 cells, the I K(erg) inherently in MA-10 cells was actually inhibited by the presence of SM-102.

Effect of SM-102 on Inwardly Rectifying K + current (IK(IR)) in BV2 Microglial Cells
Intracellular dialysis with spermine was noticed to inhibit the magnitude of IK(IR microglial cells [26]. In a final set of experiments, we further wanted to test whet

Effect of SM-102 on Inwardly Rectifying K + Current (I K(IR) ) in BV2 Microglial Cells
Intracellular dialysis with spermine was noticed to inhibit the magnitude of I K(IR) in microglial cells [26]. In a final set of experiments, we further wanted to test whether SM-102 could produce any effects on I K(IR) present in microglial cells [26,38]. As demonstrated in Figure 7A,B, the application of SM-102 drastically reduced the amplitude of I K(IR) evoked in response to the 1 s upsloping ramp pulse from −120 to +100 mV. For example, cell exposure to SM-102 at a concentration of 100 or 300 µM significantly decreased the I K(IR) amplitude measured at +50 mV to 132 ± 18 (n = 7, p < 0.05) or 99 ± 15 pA (n = 7, p < 0.05) from a control value of 161 ± 23 pA (n = 7). However, in contrast, a bath application of chlorotoxin (1 µM), an inhibitor of Cl − channels, was not noticed to exercise any effect on I K(IR) in these cells, although the I K(IR) amplitude effectively diminished in cells dialyzed with spermine (30 µM) ( Figure 7B).

Effect of SM-102 on Inwardly Rectifying K + current (IK(IR)) in BV2 Microglial C
Intracellular dialysis with spermine was noticed to inhibit the magnitude of microglial cells [26]. In a final set of experiments, we further wanted to test w SM-102 could produce any effects on IK(IR) present in microglial cells [26,3 demonstrated in Figure 7A,B, the application of SM-102 drastically reduce amplitude of IK(IR) evoked in response to the 1 sec upsloping ramp pulse from −120 mV. For example, cell exposure to SM-102 at a concentration of 100 or 30 significantly decreased the IK(IR) amplitude measured at +50 mV to 132 ± 18 (n = 7, p or 99 ± 15 pA (n= 7, p < 0.05) from a control value of 161 ± 23 pA (n = 7). Howe contrast, a bath application of chlorotoxin (1 μM), an inhibitor of Clchannels, w noticed to exercise any effect on IK(IR) in these cells, although the IK(IR) amp effectively diminished in cells dialyzed with spermine (30 μM) ( Figure 7B). Effect of SM-102 on the inwardly rectifying K + current (IK(IR)) in BV2 microglial this set of experiments, a holding potential was maintained at −50 mV and an upslopin pulse from −120 to +100 mV with a duration of 1 sec was applied to the cell examin Representative current traces obtained in the absence (a) or presence (b) of 100 μM SM-10 shows the voltage protocol used. (B) Summary bar graph showing effect of SM-102, intra dialysis with spermine, or chlorotoxin on IK(IR) amplitude activated by ramp pulse (mean ± S 7 for each bar). Each current amplitude was measured at the level of +50 mV. Data analy performed by ANOVA-1 (p < 0.05). * Significantly different from control (p < 0.05).

Discussion
In the present study, cell exposure to SM-102 was able to decrease the amplit IK(erg) and raise the deactivate rate of the current in GH3 and MA-10 ce

Discussion
In the present study, cell exposure to SM-102 was able to decrease the amplitude of I K(erg) and raise the deactivate rate of the current in GH 3 and MA-10 cells. A concentrationdependent inhibition of I K(erg) with an effective IC 50 value of 108 µM was observed in the presence of different SM-102 concentrations. The K D value derived from a quantitative description of the deactivating time course of I K(erg) was well approximated to be 134 µM, indicating that these two values were quite similar. The exposure to this compound not only decreased the I K(erg) magnitude, but also shifted the I-V relationship of the sustained I K(erg) to less negative potentials. Furthermore, its presence effectively decreased the magnitude of the voltage-dependent hysteretic strength of I K(erg) activated by an isoscelestriangular ramp pulse. In GH 3 cells dialyzed with SM-102, TurboFectin TM or spermine, the magnitude of I K(erg) progressively diminished. The I K(erg) or I K(IR) identified, respectively, in either MA-10 Leydig cells or BV2 microglial cells were actually subject to be inhibited by the presence of SM-102. Collectively, findings from this study reflected that SM-102 or TurboFectin TM tended to not be inert, and that their effectiveness in the perturbations of ionic currents demonstrated here could be a notable confounding factor which could perturb the functional activities of excitable cells occurring in vitro or in vivo.
During GH 3 -cell exposure to varying SM-102 concentrations, the deactivation rate of I K(erg) activated by a long hyperpolarizing command voltage was evidently enhanced. As such, the SM-102 or TurboFectin TM molecule tended to accelerate I K(erg) deactivation in a time-, concentration-and state-dependent manner, suggesting that they reached the blocking site of the channel, particularly as the channel resides in a high-conducting open state (conformation). Indeed, according to the minimal binding scheme, the K D value required for the SM-102-mediated acceleration of I K(erg) deactivation rate was estimated to be 134 µM.
The intriguing phenomenon of voltage-dependent hysteresis of ionic currents including I K(erg) has been proposed to play roles in influencing cell behaviors of varying types of electrically excitable cells [28][29][30][31][32]. In keeping with previous observations [28,29], the I K(erg) present in GH 3 or MA-10 cells did undergo voltage-dependent hysteresis, as it was activated by a long isosceles-triangular ramp voltage. Such hysteresis may result from a mode shift, because the voltage sensitivity of the gating charge movement is thought to rely on the previous state of the channel owing to the so-called dynamic voltage dependence. Furthermore, the instantaneous and non-equilibrium property inherent in I K(erg) elicited by the isosceles-triangular ramp voltage could be, conceivably, modified in the presence of SM-102 or TurboFectin TM . Our results also found the effectiveness of SM-102 or TurboFectin TM in diminishing the ∆area of the hysteretic loop for I K(erg) in response to a long triangular ramp pulse. Therefore, under this scenario, any modifications of I K(erg) caused by the presence of SM-102 or TurboFectin TM were dependent not simply on the concentration of SM-102 or TurboFectin TM applied, but also on varying confounding factors that included the pre-existing resting potential or different firing patterns of action potentials existing in non-voltage-clamped cells.
Because polyamines (e.g., spermine) have been previously reported to exist in cells at submillimolar concentrations, the putative activation gating behavior is assumed to result from their slow blocking and unblocking of the inwardly rectifying K + (Kir) channel [34]. Thus, on depolarization, what was previously called "deactivation" corresponded to polyamines, causing a time-dependent decrease in the outward current. On hyperpolarization, the inward Kir current first increased time-independently due to fast Mg 2+ unblocking and, then, increased in a time-dependent fashion, which was referred to as "activation", was due to polyamine unblocking [26,34]. Alternatively, in our study, as GH 3 cells were dialyzed with spermine (a polyamine compound), the magnitude of I K(erg) gradually reduced in combination with an increase in the inwardly rectifying property. Furthermore, intracellular dialysis with SM-102 or TurboFectin TM presented herein was able to produce a progressive decrease in I K(erg) , leading us to imply that the presence of polyamine ingredients would be highly engaged in this perturbation (i.e., rectification properties) occurring through a similar internal blocking mechanism.
The concentration-dependent relationship of the SM-102 effect on the I K(erg) amplitude found in MA-10 Leydig cells was also performed with an effective IC 50 value of 98 µM. We did test different compounds (e.g., E-4031 and GLNVA) for the inhibition of I K(erg) in GH 3 and MA-10 cells [17,18,20]. However, it would be interesting to perform gene-knock down experiments for testing if SM-102 could specifically block I K(erg) , although by using such a maneuver, other types of K + channels have the propensity to potentially be modified. Since the experimental conditions determined in the present study were acute in the onset and reversible, other types of K + currents which might influence the experimental results could be relatively negligible. However, the detailed mechanism of SM-102 actions on I K(erg) as well as on the apoptosis and/or proliferation assay still needs to be further delineated.
BV2 cells have been demonstrated to functionally express classical Kir channels (i.e., Kir2.1 channels) [26]. This type of K + channel is also enriched in heart cells [34,39]. It is worth noting that, since the magnitude of both I K(IR) and I K(erg) was widely expressed in heart cells [15,16,33,39], the inhibitory effectiveness of SM-102 or TurboFectin TM in altering I K(IR) and/or I K(erg) may potentially participate in the functional activities of heart function. These polycationic molecules (e.g., spermine and spermidine) enter the K ir or K erg channel pore from the intracellular side and block K + ion movement through the channel at depolarized potentials, thereby ensuring the longer plateau phase of the cardiac action potential [39]. However, to what extent SM-102-mediated perturbations on membrane ionic currents confer their effectiveness in the adverse effects of mRNA-based vaccines (e.g., Moderna TM ) has yet to be further delineated. Whether the working concentrations of SM-102 or TurboFectin TM used for their direct adjustments on ionic currents could be achieved in vitro or in vivo also remains to be determined.