Bounds for Toeplitz Determinants and Related Inequalities for a New Subclass of Analytic Functions

: In this article, we use the q -derivative operator and the principle of subordination to deﬁne a new subclass of analytic functions related to the q -Ruscheweyh operator. Sufﬁcient conditions, sharp bounds for the initial coefﬁcients, a Fekete–Szegö functional and a Toeplitz determinant are investigated for this new class of functions. Additionally, we also present several established consequences derived from our primary ﬁndings.


Introduction
Let A represent the set of all complex valued mappings u of the form which are analytic in the open unit disc O = {z ∈ C : |z| < 1}.A function u is classified as univalent in O if it never repeats the same value.The subclass of A containing univalent functions is denoted as S.
We represent by P the set comprising all analytic functions h of the form such that Re(h(z)) > 0 in O.The sets S * (δ) and C(δ) of starlike and convex functions of order δ (where 0 ≤ δ < 1), respectively, are defined as follows: S * (δ) = u ∈ A : Re z u (z) u(z) > δ, (z ∈ O) and For γ = 0, it can be seen that S * (0) = S * and C(0) = C.The families t − U CV and t − U S * of t-uniformly convex functions and t-uniformly starlike functions are defined by Kanas and Wisniowska [1,2] as follows: These two classes are generalizations of the classes of convex univalent functions and uniformly starlike functions, defined by Goodman [3].In a similar way, Wang et al. [4] studied the subfamilies S * (γ, δ) and C(γ, δ) of analytic functions defined by the following inequalities, respectively: Let u, v ∈ A, define their convolution by where, u is given by (1) and The investigation of integral and differential operators has been a valuable area of research since the inception of the theory of analytic functions.The introduction of the first integral operator can be attributed to Alexander [5] in 1915.These operators have been examined from various perspectives, including the incorporation of quantum calculus.The study of q-calculus has recently gained attention due to its wide applications in applied sciences.Jackson [6,7] was the pioneer in defining q-analogues of derivatives using qcalculus.Using q-derivatives, Ismail et al. ( [8]) defined and investigated q-starlike functions, prompting the further exploration of q-calculus within the domain of geometric functions theory (GFT).Subsequently, several q-extensions of integral and differential operators have been defined.Kanas and Rȃducanu [9] defined the q-Ruscheweyh differential operator, and Noor et al. in [10] studied the q-Bernardi integral operator.Furthermore, as a qanalogue of the operator given in [11], Govindaraj and Sivasubramanian [12] defined the q-Salagean operator.The studies by authors [13][14][15] also highlight significant contributions to the q-generalizations of certain subclasses of analytic functions.Recently, Srivastava [16] published a comprehensive review article that serves as a valuable resource for researchers and scholars involved in GFT and q-calculus.
Now, let us revisit some definitions and details regarding q-calculus, which will enhance our understanding of this new article.

Definition 3 ([6]
).For 0 < q < 1, the q-difference operator D q : A → A for u ∈ A is defined as follows: For u of the form (1), we have It can be noted that lim q→1 − [n] q = n and lim Definition 4 ([9]).For u ∈ A, the q-Ruscheweyh differential operator L λ q : A → A is defined as where λ > −1, The operator L λ q satisfies the following identity: In particular, for λ = n ∈ W = {0, 1, 2, 3, . ..}, Note that and lim which shows that when q → 1 − , the operator defined in Definition 4 reduces to the operator defined by Ruscheweyh [18].
Definition 5. A function u ∈ A is said to belong to the class S(λ, q) if the following inequality holds: zD q (L λ q u(z)) L λ q u(z) Remark 1.For specific values of λ and q → 1, we have the following special cases: • If λ = 0 and q → 1, then S(λ, q) = S * , which is the familiar subclass of starlike functions.
In particular, for m = 2 and n = 1, the Hankel determinant H m (n) reduces to the famous Fekete-Szegö functional: This functional is further generalized as where µ is any complex or real number.
The significance of the Hankel determinant is evident in the field of singularity theory [20], and it proves beneficial in the examination of power series with integer coefficients (see [21][22][23]).Several researchers have established upper bounds for H m (n) across various values of m and n, for numerous subclasses of analytic functions (see, for example, [24][25][26][27][28]).
For a function u represented by Equation ( 1), the symmetric Toeplitz determinant T m (n) is defined as where m ≥ 1, n ≥ 1 and b 1 = 1.In particular, In recent times, a number of researchers have focused on exploring the bounds of the Toeplitz determinant T m (n) for various families of analytic functions (see, for example, [29][30][31][32]).In the investigation of Toeplitz determinants, the research conducted in [33,34] incorporates elements of quantum calculus, while [35] explores a set of analytic functions introduced through the utilization of the Borel distribution.
Our main results rely on the utilization of the following Lemmas for their proof.
The inequality is sharp for the functions given by The inequality is sharp for the function given by • is an analytic function with a positive real part in O, and µ is a complex number, then for all n, k ∈ N and k < n.The inequality is sharp for the function given by

Main Results
The following result gives the sufficient conditions for the functions belonging to the class S(λ, q).Theorem 1.Let u ∈ A be given by Equation (1), satisfying Then, u ∈ S(λ, q).

Proof.
Let . Then, is a Schwarz function and we can write Hence, the result follows.
Theorem 2. Let u ∈ S(λ, q) be given by Equation (1), then All the inequalities are sharp for the function g(z), given by the equation Proof.If u ∈ S(λ, q), then Then, using Equations ( 4) and ( 5), we have Using Cauchy product formula [20] and simplifying it, we obtain Comparing coefficients of z 2 , z 3 , z 4 and simplifying, we have Using Equations ( 17)- (19) in Equation ( 15), we obtain We also know that for each Schwartz function w which implies Using values of ω 1 , ω 2 and ω 3 in Equation ( 21), we obtain In view of ( 14), comparing the coefficients of z from ( 20) and ( 22), we have Taking the modulus and applying Lemma 2, we obtain the desired inequality (10).
Comparing the coefficients of z 2 from ( 20) and ( 22), we have Using Equation (23) and simplifying it, we obtain Taking the modulus and applying Lemma 1, we obtain the desired inequality (11).
Comparing the coefficients of z 3 from Equations ( 20) and ( 22), we have Using Equations ( 23) and ( 24) and simplifying the above equation, we obtain The last equation can be rearranged as Taking the absolute value and applying Lemmas 1-3, we obtain which yields the inequality (12).The series expansion of f (z) given by ( 13) is which clearly demonstrates the sharpness of the inequalities ( 10)-( 12).
Theorem 3. Let u ∈ S(λ, q) be given by Equation (1); then, for any µ ∈ C, The sharp bound occurs for the function f (z) described by Equation ( 13) under the condition that µ(1 + q) 2 ψ 3,λ,q ψ 2 2,λ,q − q(1 + q) − 1 ≥ 1.Alternatively, if this condition is not met, the sharp bound pertains to the function g(z) defined by the equation zD q (L λ q g(z)) L λ q g(z) Proof.Using Equations ( 23) and ( 24), we can write Applying modulus and using Lemma 1, we obtain the required inequality.
All the inequalities are sharp for the function which is the solution of zD q (L λ q g(z)) L λ q g(z) Proof.Let u ∈ S(λ, q) be given by Equation (1); then, Taking absolute and applying triangle inequality, we have Taking n = 1, n = 2, and n = 3 and using inequalities (10)- (12), we obtain the required inequalities.
The inequality is sharp for the function Proof.Using λ = 1 and taking limit q → 1 − , we obtain the desired inequality.
Example 2. The function is a starlike function because For the function v(z) given by Equation (36), we have which validates Corollary 2 for the function v ∈ S * .
Theorem 5.If u ∈ S(λ, q), then The inequality is sharp for the function g(z) defined in Equation (32).
Proof.Let u ∈ S(λ, q) be given by Equation (1), then Taking the absolute and applying triangle inequality, we can write Using inequalities (10) and (11) and applying Theorem 3, we obtain the required result.
The inequality is sharp for the function g(z) defined by Equation (35).
Theorem 6.If u ∈ S(λ, q), then where The inequality is sharp for the function g(z) defined in Equation (32).
Proof.Using λ = 1 and taking limit q → 1 − , we obtain the required inequality.

Conclusions
In this article, we have defined a new subclass of analytic functions associated with the q-Ruscheweyh operator.After finding sufficient conditions for the analytic functions belonging to this class, we establish sharp bounds for the initial coefficients, secondand third-order Toeplitz determinants and the Fekete-Szegö functional for the functions belonging to the newly defined class.We also demonstrate several established corollaries of our primary findings to highlight the interrelation between existing and novel research.
A function u belonging to the class A is referred to as a starlike function (represented as u ∈ S * ) and a convex function (represented as u ∈ C) if it meets the following inequality conditions: Re z u (z) u(z) > 0, (z ∈ O) and Re 1 + zu (z) u (z) > 0, (z ∈ O).