On Some Error Bounds for Milne’s Formula in Fractional Calculus

: In this paper, we found the error bounds for one of the open Newton–Cotes formulas, namely Milne’s formula for differentiable convex functions in the framework of fractional and classical calculus. We also give some mathematical examples to show that the newly established bounds are valid for Milne’s formula.


Introduction
In recent years, many researchers have developed numerical integration formulas and found their error bounds using different techniques.To determine the error bounds of numerical integration formulas, mathematical inequalities are used, and the authors used various functions, such as convex functions, bounded functions, Lipschitzian functions, and so on.For example, some error bounds for trapezoidal and midpoint formulas of numerical integration using the convex functions were found in [1,2].A number of papers have been published on the error bounds of Simpson's formula using the convex functions in different calculi, and some of these bounds can be found in [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Some error bounds for Newton's formula in numerical integration have also been established by using the convex functions in different calculi, and these bounds can be found in [11][12][13][14][15].
Due to its proven applications in a variety of seemingly unrelated fields of science and industry, fractional calculus, which is the calculus of integrals and derivatives of any arbitrary real or complex order, has gained prominence and relevance during the past three decades.In fact, it provides several potentially useful techniques for resolving differential and integral equations, as well as a number of other issues involving unique mathematical physics functions, as well as their extensions and generalizations in one or more variables.
Considering the importance of fractional calculus (see [19][20][21][22][23]), researchers have used Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals to develop a number of fractional integral inequalities that have been demonstrated to be very helpful in approximation theory.We can determine the boundaries of formulas used in numerical integration by employing inequalities, such as Hermite-Hadamard, Simpson's, the midpoint, Ostrowski's, and trapezoidal inequalities, etc.In [24], Sarikaya et al. proved some Hermite-Hadamardtype inequalities and trapezoidal-type inequalities for the first time using the Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals.The authors of [25] proved a Riemann-Liouville fractional version of Ostrowski's inequalities for differentiable functions.˙Işcan and Wu used harmonic convexity and proved Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities in [26].For more inequalities via fractional integrals, one can consult [27][28][29][30] and references therein.
Inspired by the ongoing studies, we give the fractional version of Milne's formula-type inequalities for differentiable convex functions and Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals.We also give some mathematical examples for newly established inequalities to show their validity.The main advantage of these inequalities is that they can be converted into classical inequalities for α = 1 and we can also find some more results for the whole interval of α.

Main Results
In this section, we establish and prove some Milne's rule-type inequalities for differentiable convex functions.For this, we will prove the following lemma first.
then the following equality holds: Proof.From the fundamental rules of integration and Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals, we have and Thus, we get the following equality by adding (2)-( 5) Similarly, we have Hence, we get the required equality by adding ( 6) and (7).
Proof.Taking modulus of equality (1), we have Now, using the convexity of |̥ ′ | and the fact that for α ∈ (0, 1] and κ 1 , Thus, the proof is completed.
Corollary 1.For α = 1 in Theorem 1, we have the following Milne's rule type inequality: This inequality helps us find the error bound of Milne's rule.
Proof.Taking modulus of equality (1) and using Hölder's inequality, we have . Now, using convexity of |̥ ′ | q , q > 1, we have Thus, the proof is completed.
Corollary 2. For α = 1 in Theorem 2, we have the following Milne's rule type inequality: This inequality helps us find the error bound of Milne's rule.

Examples
In this section, we give some mathematical examples to show the validity of the first-time-developed Milne's rule-type inequalities in fractional calculus.

Conclusions
In this work, we have proven an identity involving Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals and differentiable functions.Then, we have proven some error bounds for Milne's formula by using the newly established identity in the setting of fractional and classical calculus.Finally, we have added some examples to show the validity of the newly proven bounds.The results presented in this paper are more useful than the classical calculus because already established bounds are the special case of our results for α = 1 and our results hold for the whole interval given for α.It is an interesting and new problem for upcoming researchers that they can obtain similar inequalities for other fractional integrals and coordinates.