Next Article in Journal
Fixed Points on Covariant and Contravariant Maps with an Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Sparsity-Constrained Vector Autoregressive Moving Average Models for Anomaly Detection of Complex Systems with Multisensory Signals
Previous Article in Journal
Fixed/Predefined-Time Synchronization of Complex-Valued Stochastic BAM Neural Networks with Stabilizing and Destabilizing Impulse
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Asymmetric Control Limits for Weighted-Variance Mean Control Chart with Different Scale Estimators under Weibull Distributed Process

1
Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
2
Department of Mathematical and Actuarial Sciences, Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science, Sungai Long Campus, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Sungai Long, Bandar Sungai Long, Cheras, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
3
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2022, 10(22), 4380; https://doi.org/10.3390/math10224380
Submission received: 29 September 2022 / Revised: 17 November 2022 / Accepted: 18 November 2022 / Published: 21 November 2022

Abstract

Shewhart charts are the most commonly utilised control charts for process monitoring in industries with the assumption that the underlying distribution of the quality characteristic is normal. However, this assumption may not always hold true in practice. In this paper, the weighted-variance mean charts are developed and their population standard deviation is estimated using the three subgroup scale estimators, namely the standard deviation, median absolute deviation and standard deviation of trimmed mean for monitoring Weibull distributed data with different coefficients of skewness. This study aims to compare the out-of-control average run length of these charts with the pre-determined fixed value of the in-control ARL in terms of different scale estimators, coefficients of skewness and sample sizes via extensive simulation studies. The results indicate that as the coefficients of skewness increase, the charts tend to detect the out-of-control signal more rapidly under identical magnitude of shift. Meanwhile, as the size of the shift increases under the same coefficient of skewness, the proposed charts are able to locate the shifts quicker and the similar scenarios arise as a sample size raised from 5 to 10. A real data set from survival analysis domain which, possessing Weibull distribution, was to demonstrate the usefulness and applicability of the proposed chart in practice.
Keywords: weighted-variance; asymmetric control limits; mean chart; Weibull distribution; scale estimator; average run length weighted-variance; asymmetric control limits; mean chart; Weibull distribution; scale estimator; average run length

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, J.J.; Ng, K.H.; Ng, K.H.; Peiris, S.; Koh, Y.B. Asymmetric Control Limits for Weighted-Variance Mean Control Chart with Different Scale Estimators under Weibull Distributed Process. Mathematics 2022, 10, 4380. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10224380

AMA Style

Zhou JJ, Ng KH, Ng KH, Peiris S, Koh YB. Asymmetric Control Limits for Weighted-Variance Mean Control Chart with Different Scale Estimators under Weibull Distributed Process. Mathematics. 2022; 10(22):4380. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10224380

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Jing Jia, Kok Haur Ng, Kooi Huat Ng, Shelton Peiris, and You Beng Koh. 2022. "Asymmetric Control Limits for Weighted-Variance Mean Control Chart with Different Scale Estimators under Weibull Distributed Process" Mathematics 10, no. 22: 4380. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10224380

APA Style

Zhou, J. J., Ng, K. H., Ng, K. H., Peiris, S., & Koh, Y. B. (2022). Asymmetric Control Limits for Weighted-Variance Mean Control Chart with Different Scale Estimators under Weibull Distributed Process. Mathematics, 10(22), 4380. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10224380

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop