This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Social Media Versus Learning Management Systems in Open Distance e-Learning: Platform Preferences Among Rural Pre-Service Teachers
by
Siyabonga Alfa Zwane
Siyabonga Alfa Zwane * and
Patience Kelebogile Mudau
Patience Kelebogile Mudau
School of Teacher Education, University of South Africa, Pretoria 0002, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(6), 821; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060821 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 13 March 2026
/
Revised: 12 May 2026
/
Accepted: 20 May 2026
/
Published: 23 May 2026
Abstract
This study examined rural pre-service teachers’ preferences for online learning platforms, Telegram, WhatsApp, and Moodle discussion forums in the Open Distance e-Learning environment. This group of students experiences digital illiteracy, limited access to assistive technologies, and network challenges, which may prevent them from optimally utilising formal learning platforms such as Moodle. They can, however, use Telegram and WhatsApp, as they regularly engage informally on these platforms. Against this backdrop, this study explored rural pre-service teachers’ experiences with Moodle and these social media platforms in an Open-Distance e-Learning space. This study employed a descriptive, qualitative case study with semi-structured interviews, guided by Siemens’ Connectivism theory. Fifteen student teachers from the College of Education in an ODeL institution were purposively sampled to provide in-depth insights into their lived experiences of platform use. The findings revealed that, although each platform served a unique instructional function, their perceived professionalism, safety, and interactivity differed substantially. Social media platforms such as Telegram and WhatsApp were lauded for their immediacy, accessibility, and low bandwidth usage, chiefly among rural pre-service teachers from economically disadvantaged communities. However, participants perceived these platforms as unprofessional, disruptive, and unsafe. Conversely, Moodle’s discussion forum was viewed as a credible, structured space that fostered academic discipline through the presence and guidance of lecturers. These contrasting perceptions highlight tensions between accessibility and academic regulation within ODeL environments. Although prior studies support incorporating social media platforms into LMSs, this research extends this discourse by emphasising the need to balance accessibility, interaction, and academic integrity within resource-constrained contexts. The study concludes that social media platforms and discussion forums can complement each other in ODeL, encouraging student interaction and inclusion, while discussion forums ensure educational rigour, safety, and institutional integrity.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Zwane, S.A.; Mudau, P.K.
Social Media Versus Learning Management Systems in Open Distance e-Learning: Platform Preferences Among Rural Pre-Service Teachers. Educ. Sci. 2026, 16, 821.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060821
AMA Style
Zwane SA, Mudau PK.
Social Media Versus Learning Management Systems in Open Distance e-Learning: Platform Preferences Among Rural Pre-Service Teachers. Education Sciences. 2026; 16(6):821.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060821
Chicago/Turabian Style
Zwane, Siyabonga Alfa, and Patience Kelebogile Mudau.
2026. "Social Media Versus Learning Management Systems in Open Distance e-Learning: Platform Preferences Among Rural Pre-Service Teachers" Education Sciences 16, no. 6: 821.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060821
APA Style
Zwane, S. A., & Mudau, P. K.
(2026). Social Media Versus Learning Management Systems in Open Distance e-Learning: Platform Preferences Among Rural Pre-Service Teachers. Education Sciences, 16(6), 821.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060821
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.