Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This paper is an interesting estudy on the factors that promotes motivation in learning Natural Sciences. It shows how interest, curiosity and commiment influence subjects motivation to learn, in this case Natural Sciences.

However, there are hardly any references to the social factors thar can influence this motivation, i.e, subjects interest, curiosity  and commiment to a particular field of knowledge. It is therefore recommended that some reflection be provided in this regard, supported by the corresponding bibliography.

Author Response

Comments 1: However, there are hardly any references to the social factors thar can influence this motivation, i.e, subjects interest, curiosity and commiment to a particular field of knowledge. It is therefore recommended that some reflection be provided in this regard, supported by the corresponding bibliography.

Response 1: Thank you for pointing this out. The comment has been addressed, and the reflection on the social factors influencing motivation has been incorporated into the discussion section of the manuscript, supported by the relevant literature.

Thank you very much for your valuable comments and suggestions. We have carefully considered them, and the manuscript has been improved accordingly. Your feedback has greatly contributed to enhancing the quality of our study.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Thank you for this great work! I only have a few minor suggestions. The first is figures 1 and 2 are quite blurry and hard to read clearly, I would suggest reuploading or making them more clearly. Also the caption when you hover over the figures is in Spanish but the rest of the article is English. Line 224 define PRISMA and give a brief description what it is. Line 389 states "both genders" I would suggest rephrasing for improved inclusivity and say male and female or something similar. 

Author Response

Comments 1: The first is figures 1 and 2 are quite blurry and hard to read clearly, I would suggest reuploading or making them more clearly.

Response 1: Thank you very much for your observation. Figures 1 and 2 have been modified and now have better resolution to facilitate readability. I greatly appreciate your comments and the time you dedicated to the review.

Comments 2: Also the caption when you hover over the figures is in Spanish but the rest of the article is English.

 Response 2: Thank you for pointing this out. It has been checked, and the text that appears when hovering over the figures is now also in English to ensure consistency throughout the article.

Comments 3: Line 224 define PRISMA and give a brief description what it is.

 Response 3: PRISMA has been briefly described.

Comments 4: Line 389 states "both genders" I would suggest rephrasing for improved inclusivity and say male and female or something similar.

Response 4: The sentence has been changed.

Thank you very much for your valuable comments and suggestions. We have carefully considered them, and the manuscript has been improved accordingly. Your feedback has greatly contributed to enhancing the quality of our study.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf