Enhancing Performance of Millimeter Wave MIMO Antenna with a Decoupling and Common Defected Ground Approach

: An approach is presented to enhance the isolation of a two-port Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) antenna using a decoupling structure and a common defected ground structure (DGS) that physically separates the antennas from each other. The antenna operates in the 24 to 40 GHz frequency range. The innovation in the presented MIMO antenna design involves the novel integration of two arc-shaped symmetrical elements with dimensions of 35 × 35 × 1.6 mm 3 placed perpendicular to each other. The beneﬁts of employing an antenna with elements arranged perpendicularly are exempliﬁed by the enhancement of its overall performance metrics. These elements incorporate a microstrip feed featuring a quarter-wave transformer (QWT). This concept synergizes with decoupling techniques and a defected ground structure to signiﬁcantly enhance isolation in a millimeter wave (mm wave) MIMO antenna. These methods collectively achieve an impressively wide bandwidth. Efﬁcient decoupling methodologies have been implemented, yielding a notable increase of 5 dB in isolation performance. The antenna exhibits 10 dB impedance matching, with a 15 GHz (46.87%) wide bandwidth, excellent isolation of more than 28 dB, and a desirable gain of 4.6 dB. Antennas have been analyzed to improve their performance in mm wave applications by evaluating diversity parameters such as envelope correlation coefﬁcient (ECC) and diversity gain (DG), with achieved values of 0.0016 and 9.992 dB, respectively. The simulation is conducted using CST software. To validate the ﬁndings, experimental investigations have been conducted, afﬁrming the accuracy of the simulations.


Introduction
In a world driven by the growing need for high-speed wireless communications, researchers and innovators are working hard to advance fifth generation (5G) wireless networks [1].The demand for fast data transmission has increased, especially with the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT), smart homes, industrial automation, and remote medical services [2].The challenge lies in overcoming the congestion that plagues existing systems, which is where 5G comes in [3][4][5].Utilizing this means venturing into the higher-frequency bands that are capable of supporting these increased data speeds [6].However, as with any progress, there are obstacles that have to be overcome.Employing shorter wavelengths in the higher-frequency band has a drawback: increased path loss for short-distance communications [7,8].This implies that signals become weaker and attenuate faster, resulting in reduced coverage [9].This is a challenge that must be addressed for 5G to reach its full potential.Despite these obstacles, researchers are determined to find the right solution [10].Various types of antennas have been examined for their suitability in 5G communication bands.These include the short dipole antenna [11], microstrip patch antenna [12], ultra-wideband horn antenna [13], loop antenna [14], slot antenna [15], aperture antenna [16], Yagi-Uda antenna [17], leaky-wave antenna [18], and log-periodic antenna [19].Different types of antennas have been put under the microscope for their suitability in the 5G communication bands [20].These antennas have gained popularity in wireless communication due to their advantageous features.With their low profile, compact size, and cost-effective manufacturing, microstrip antennas are well-suited for 5G technology applications [21,22].
Innovative techniques such as implementing a decoupler and common DGS show promise.The decoupler effectively minimizes mutual coupling between antenna elements, while the DGS structure suppresses surface wave propagation along the ground plane, reducing interference and improving overall antenna performance [23].As the world continues towards an ever-expanding realm of wireless communication, researchers are continuously exploring methods by which to tackle the challenges posed by mm wave MIMO antennas [24].From neutralization lines to electromagnetic band gap structures, diversity techniques, and decoupling structures, each approach seeks to enhance isolation performance at specific frequency bands commonly used in 5G wireless systems [25].One fundamental approach involves manipulating the physical arrangement of the antenna elements.Techniques such as element spacing, orientation, and polarization are explored to reduce the coupling effect [26].Innovative electromagnetic structures, such as metamaterials and electromagnetic band gap (EBG) structures, are employed to control the coupling between antenna elements [27].
Yet challenges persist, especially in terms of integrating multiple antennas into compact portable devices.The potential coupling issues can severely impact the diversity performance of antennas [28].Metamaterial-inspired structures, such as capacitive-loaded loops [29], split-ring resonators [30], and metamaterial superstrates [31], have proven effective at enhancing the isolation of MIMO antennas.However, integrating these structures can lead to challenges such as increased space requirements and heightened design intricacies [32].This complexity arises from the integration of intricate RF circuits into compact communication devices.Consequently, contemporary research is actively focused on elevating the performance of printed MIMO technology.This emphasis is placed on optimizing antenna gain, bandwidth, isolation, and radiation properties while minimizing both design complexity and associated costs.Ensuring high isolation has become a crucial task for optimal functionality in MIMO communication systems, particularly in the world of portable devices [33].Many decoupling techniques involve trade-offs between antenna performance metrics, such as isolation, gain, and bandwidth.Achieving one objective might negatively impact others.Moreover, some advanced techniques increase the complexity of the system, requiring careful consideration of the associated costs and benefits [34].MIMO systems often operate in multiple frequency bands, which makes it challenging to apply a single decoupling technique across all bands.Solutions that work well in one band might not perform optimally in another.The practical implementation of certain decoupling techniques can be complex and may pose challenges during the manufacturing process or integration into compact devices [35].
Environmental effects and Real-World Conditions: The performance of decoupling techniques can vary under different environmental conditions, such as varying electromagnetic environments and interference sources.Accurately testing and validating the effectiveness of decoupling techniques in real-world scenarios can be difficult, and may require sophisticated measurement setups and simulations [36].
In this study, a two-port arc-shaped MIMO antenna with a common DGS incorporates a compact and highly integrated decoupling structure.The unique arc shape is chosen for its ability to create an extended electrical path within a limited space, resulting in a compact, yet efficient, antenna design.The MIMO configuration employs an orthogonal arrangement of antennas to minimize undesired interaction between elements.The DGS operates at the intersection of electromagnetic wave behavior and material characteristics.Using dielectric guides improves the paths of coupling currents for higher efficiency while reducing mutual coupling by changing how fields interact.This approach leverages fundamental electromagnetic principles to improve isolation and overall antenna performance.To further enhance isolation, the proposed decoupling structure effectively addresses the gap between antennas, thereby boosting system performance and efficiency.The MIMO structure positions antennas orthogonally to mitigate undesirable electromagnetic coupling.Nevertheless, the achieved performance fell within the desired range for MIMO applications in different countries such as those in Europe (26.5-27.5 GHz), as well as China (24.25-27.5 GHz), Japan (28.2-29.1 GHz, 29.1-29.5 GHz, 39.5-40 GHz), Republic of Korea (26.5-29.5 GHz), the USA (24.25-29.5 GHz and 37-40 GHz), and Sweden (26.5-27.5 GHz), covering the target frequency bands.A wideband antenna spanning the 24 to 40 GHz frequency range serves a diverse range of applications, including 5G communication, radar systems, satellite links, remote sensing, wireless backhaul, imaging, security screening, scientific research, and automotive radar.Its capability to operate across this broad frequency spectrum renders it a versatile choice for high-frequency communication and sensing tasks.
Table 1 illustrates the superiority, and Table 2 demonstrates the advantages and demerits, of the proposed compact mm wave antenna compared with previous designs.The proposed approach operates within the 25-40 GHz frequency range, measures 35 × 35 mm 2 in size, has two ports, and combines decoupling and DGS techniques.It achieves exceptional isolation performance, exceeding 28.7 dB, surpassing most referenced works.The extremely low envelope correlation coefficient (ECC) of 0.0016 demonstrates improved signal isolation.Additionally, the diversity gain (DG) metric indicates signal degradation exceeds 9.992.Compared with existing references, the proposed work not only enhances isolation but also offers a wider 15 GHz bandwidth for efficient signal handling.This study presents a superior approach by which to enhance isolation and maintain signal integrity in the specified frequency range, with its compact design, improved isolation, and wider bandwidth setting it apart from previous works.
This study thoroughly examines a MIMO antenna design using CST simulations and validates the results with a physical prototype analyzed via a Rohde and Schwarz ZNB 40 vector network analyzer (VNA).Section 1 introduces the integration of mm wave into MIMO antennas, emphasizing the use of DGS and decoupling techniques.It includes a comparative analysis against existing literature (Tables 1 and 2).Section 2 covers the single antenna design evolution and performance analysis.Section 3 outlines the MIMO antenna configuration with specific dimensions in Table 3. Section 4 demonstrates the parametric analysis of the proposed antenna.Section 5 presents simulated results and discussion, while measurement analysis is presented in Section 6. Section 7 delves into diversity performance, and finally, Section 8 provides a summary and conclusion.

Design Evolution of Single Antenna Configuration
The design of a high-frequency arc-shaped patch antenna consists of a copper microstrip patch printed on an RT-5880 substrate, as depicted in Figure 1d.The parameterized top and bottom views are depicted in Figure 2. The arc-shaped microstrip patch has a breadth of 0.01 mm.The 1.6 mm-thick substrate, with a dielectric constant (ε r ) of 2.2 and a loss tangent (tan) of 0.009, serves as the supporting material for the antenna.The antenna has been designed to function in the 24 GHz to 40 GHz frequency range.The dimension of the single antenna is 17.5 × 17.5 mm 2 , with a full ground layer added at the base of the substrate.The patches are fed with 50 Ω microstrip transmission lines.Additionally, for the purpose of impedance matching, a QWT is also used.to match the transmission line's characteristic impedance.This reduction in impedance mismatch losses significantly improved power transfer efficiency, ensuring effective energy transmission.In this specific configuration, the antenna demonstrated a wide operating bandwidth, ranging from 26.3 to 36.1 GHz (FWB of 31.41%).Two prominent resonances are observed at 28 GHz and 33.9 GHz, as indicated in Figure 3 (Iteration 3).Additionally, the maximum gain reached 4.4 dB, as shown in Figure 4 (Iteration 3).Moving on to Iteration 4, a rectangular stub was incorporated into the center of the arc-shaped patch, as depicted in Figure 1d.This design alteration aimed to achieve broad impedance-matching characteristics.Because of these improvements, the changed antenna consistently showed a reflection coefficient below −10 dB over a wider frequency range, from 25 to 40 GHz, with an FWB of 46.15%.Notable resonating frequencies are observed at 26 GHz, 31.8GHz, and 36.5 GHz, as demonstrated in Figure 3 (Iteration 4).In this particular configuration, the maximum gain is measured at 4.6 dB, as indicated in Figure 4 (Iteration 4).   to match the transmission line's characteristic impedance.This reduction in impedance mismatch losses significantly improved power transfer efficiency, ensuring effective energy transmission.In this specific configuration, the antenna demonstrated a wide operating bandwidth, ranging from 26.3 to 36.1 GHz (FWB of 31.41%).Two prominent resonances are observed at 28 GHz and 33.9 GHz, as indicated in Figure 3 (Iteration 3).Additionally, the maximum gain reached 4.4 dB, as shown in Figure 4 (Iteration 3).Moving on to Iteration 4, a rectangular stub was incorporated into the center of the arc-shaped patch, as depicted in Figure 1d.This design alteration aimed to achieve broad impedance-matching characteristics.Because of these improvements, the changed antenna consistently showed a reflection coefficient below −10 dB over a wider frequency range, from 25 to 40 GHz, with an FWB of 46.15%.Notable resonating frequencies are observed at 26 GHz, 31.8GHz, and 36.5 GHz, as demonstrated in Figure 3 (Iteration 4).In this particular configuration, the maximum gain is measured at 4.6 dB, as indicated in Figure 4 (Iteration 4).The initial single antenna underwent a series of four iterative optimization stages to achieve the desired performance outcomes, as depicted in Figure 1a-d.In iteration 1, the antenna is designed with a circular patch featuring a microstrip feed located on a dielectric substrate (see Figure 1a).As a result of this configuration, the antenna demonstrated a reflection coefficient (||S11||) below −10 dB across a frequency range of 24 to 25.6 GHz (fractional bandwidth (FBW) of 5%) and 29.6 to 33.2 GHz (FBW of 11.25%), as demonstrated in Figure 3 (Iteration 1).In this configuration, the maximum gain achieved was 2.8 dB, as depicted in Figure 4 (Iteration 1).Moving on to iteration 2 of the design process, an elliptical slot was carefully introduced onto the previously circular patch.This transformation resulted in the patch taking on an arc-shaped configuration, guided by the principles described in Equation ( 1), as shown in Figure 1b.The introduction of this slot has a significant impact on the resonant frequency of the antenna, leading to the emergence of an additional resonating band close to the original resonant frequency, resulting in a dual-band response.Achieving optimal placement and orientation of the elliptical slot on the patch was crucial for attaining the desired wider bandwidth and increased gain.This optimization process involved fine-tuning the position of the elliptical slot on the radiating plane while closely monitoring its current distribution.As a result of these changes, the antenna exhibited a ||S11|| consistently below −10 dB over frequency ranges spanning 24 to 28.2 GHz (FBW of 13.12%) and 33.1 to 40 GHz (FBW of 21.56%), as demonstrated in Figure 4 (Iteration 2).In this configuration, the maximum gain achieved was 3.9 dB, as depicted in Figure 4 (Iteration 2).
where H is the height of the substrate, K dielectric constant and F 0 is the center frequency.The F 0 is given by Equation ( 2)    Along with the current density meter, Figure 5 shows a full analysis of the arc-shaped patch antenna's current distribution at three different frequencies: 26 GHz, 31.8GHz, and 36.5 GHz.This examination offers valuable insights into the antenna's behavior in response to electromagnetic fields at these specific frequencies.The visual representation of the current distribution is generated using a CST simulator.To convey the magnitude of the surface current of the antenna, a color gradient is employed, and the legend adjacent to each diagram corresponds to the magnitude levels.Specifically, blue indicates the minimum surface current while red signifies the maximum current.In Figure 5a, at 40 GHz, the QWT section with the transmission line exhibits a prominent red color, indicating a high current distribution, while the patch displays a lower current concentration.Conversely, Figure 5b shows an increased surface current distribution primarily focused on the patch.Figure 5c highlights that the maximum current distribution occurs at the patch, surpassing the observed current in Figure 5a,b.This observation indicates that the current intensity is at its peak at higher frequencies when compared with lower frequencies.In the third iteration of the design, a QWT is introduced into the feed line, as illustrated in Figure 1c.The primary objective was to optimize impedance matching to enable efficient power transfer between the antennas.This resulted from the carefully choice of the QWT's length and characteristic impedance, which effectively changed the antenna's impedance to match the transmission line's characteristic impedance.This reduction in impedance mismatch losses significantly improved power transfer efficiency, ensuring effective energy transmission.In this specific configuration, the antenna demonstrated a wide operating bandwidth, ranging from 26.3 to 36.1 GHz (FWB of 31.41%).Two prominent resonances are observed at 28 GHz and 33.9 GHz, as indicated in Figure 3 (Iteration 3).Additionally, the maximum gain reached 4.4 dB, as shown in Figure 4 (Iteration 3).Moving on to Iteration 4, a rectangular stub was incorporated into the center of the arc-shaped patch, as depicted in Figure 1d.This design alteration aimed to achieve broad impedance-matching characteristics.Because of these improvements, the changed antenna consistently showed a reflection coefficient below −10 dB over a wider frequency range, from 25 to 40 GHz, with an FWB of 46.15%.Notable resonating frequencies are observed at 26 GHz, 31.8GHz, and 36.5 GHz, as demonstrated in Figure 3 (Iteration 4).
In this particular configuration, the maximum gain is measured at 4.6 dB, as indicated in Figure 4 (Iteration 4).
Along with the current density meter, Figure 5 shows a full analysis of the arc-shaped patch antenna's current distribution at three different frequencies: 26 GHz, 31.8GHz, and 36.5 GHz.This examination offers valuable insights into the antenna's behavior in response to electromagnetic fields at these specific frequencies.The visual representation of the current distribution is generated using a CST simulator.To convey the magnitude of the surface current of the antenna, a color gradient is employed, and the legend adjacent to each diagram corresponds to the magnitude levels.Specifically, blue indicates the minimum surface current while red signifies the maximum current.In Figure 5a, at 40 GHz, the QWT section with the transmission line exhibits a prominent red color, indicating a high current distribution, while the patch displays a lower current concentration.Conversely, Figure 5b shows an increased surface current distribution primarily focused on the patch.Figure 5c highlights that the maximum current distribution occurs at the patch, surpassing the observed current in Figure 5a,b.This observation indicates that the current intensity is at its peak at higher frequencies when compared with lower frequencies.

Parametric Analysis of Single Antenna
One-patch antenna design is the focus of this section, which uses a detailed parametric analysis to examine the important factors that affect how it works.Figure 6a illustrates the variation of the radius (r) of the arc-shaped patch at different values.It is noteworthy that optimal performance in terms of the ||S11|| parameter is achieved when the radius is set at r = 5.2 mm.The antenna design under consideration incorporates a rectangular stub (R1 × R2) positioned at the center of the arc-shaped patch, which plays a pivotal role in achieving a wide bandwidth within the desired frequency band.Figure 6b presents the variation of R1 at different values, revealing that R1 = 3.3 mm yields the most favorable outcomes in terms of bandwidth.Notably, as R1 values increase, there is a noticeable downward shift in the S11 graph towards lower frequencies.Furthermore, Figure 6b showcases the variation of R2 at different values, with R2 = 1.8 mm demonstrating the best results in terms of bandwidth.Conversely, as R2 values increase, the S11 graph exhibits poor impedance matching and shifts towards a higher magnitude.These findings provide valuable insights into optimizing the antenna design for enhanced performance.

Parametric Analysis of Single Antenna
One-patch antenna design is the focus of this section, which uses a detailed parametric analysis to examine the important factors that affect how it works.Figure 6a illustrates the variation of the radius (r) of the arc-shaped patch at different values.It is noteworthy that optimal performance in terms of the ||S11|| parameter is achieved when the radius is set at r = 5.2 mm.The antenna design under consideration incorporates a rectangular stub (R1 × R2) positioned at the center of the arc-shaped patch, which plays a pivotal role in achieving a wide bandwidth within the desired frequency band.Figure 6b presents the variation of R1 at different values, revealing that R1 = 3.3 mm yields the most favorable outcomes in terms of bandwidth.Notably, as R1 values increase, there is a noticeable downward shift in the S11 graph towards lower frequencies.Furthermore, Figure 6b showcases the variation of R2 at different values, with R2 = 1.8 mm demonstrating the best results in terms of bandwidth.Conversely, as R2 values increase, the S11 graph exhibits poor impedance matching and shifts towards a higher magnitude.These findings provide valuable insights into optimizing the antenna design for enhanced performance.

Parametric Analysis of Single Antenna
One-patch antenna design is the focus of this section, which uses a detailed parametric analysis to examine the important factors that affect how it works.Figure 6a illustrates the variation of the radius (r) of the arc-shaped patch at different values.It is noteworthy that optimal performance in terms of the ||S11|| parameter is achieved when the radius is set at r = 5.2 mm.The antenna design under consideration incorporates a rectangular stub (R1 × R2) positioned at the center of the arc-shaped patch, which plays a pivotal role in achieving a wide bandwidth within the desired frequency band.Figure 6b presents the variation of R1 at different values, revealing that R1 = 3.3 mm yields the most favorable outcomes in terms of bandwidth.Notably, as R1 values increase, there is a noticeable downward shift in the S11 graph towards lower frequencies.Furthermore, Figure 6b showcases the variation of R2 at different values, with R2 = 1.8 mm demonstrating the best results in terms of bandwidth.Conversely, as R2 values increase, the S11 graph exhibits poor impedance matching and shifts towards a higher magnitude.These findings provide valuable insights into optimizing the antenna design for enhanced performance.

MIMO Antenna Configuration
In this section, we describe the transformation of a single antenna into a two-element orthogonally oriented MIMO antenna, as illustrated in Figure 7.This configuration serves to demonstrate the influence of element orientation on impedance matching and isolation between the antenna ports.The two antenna elements are placed on a common substrate with an edge-to-edge spacing of 3.5 mm.The mutual connection between the antenna elements has been observed in this configuration.To overcome the mutual coupling, we introduce a DGS with dimensions of 35 × 35 mm 2 for both antenna elements.The modification of the ground surface involves removing two circular rings at the center and excluding eight metal strips with a rotational orientation.This altered ground structure acts as a barrier, limiting electromagnetic coupling between the two antennas.
To enhance isolation further, we introduce a metal strip with a slotted ring-shaped structure between the antenna radiators, serving as an isolator.This slotted ring structure functions as a resonant element that impacts the currents on the antennas, thereby improving isolation.The MIMO antenna design boasts a compact size, straightforward structure, and cost-efficiency.We achieve wide-band operation by optimizing these parameters, covering the desired frequency range with three specific resonances at 28.5 GHz, 33 GHz, and 38.5 GHz.

MIMO Antenna Configuration
In this section, we describe the transformation of a single antenna into a two-element orthogonally oriented MIMO antenna, as illustrated in Figure 7.This configuration serves to demonstrate the influence of element orientation on impedance matching and isolation between the antenna ports.The two antenna elements are placed on a common substrate with an edge-to-edge spacing of 3.5 mm.The mutual connection between the antenna elements has been observed in this configuration.To overcome the mutual coupling, we introduce a DGS with dimensions of 35 × 35 mm 2 for both antenna elements.The modification of the ground surface involves removing two circular rings at the center and excluding eight metal strips with a rotational orientation.This altered ground structure acts as a barrier, limiting electromagnetic coupling between the two antennas.

MIMO Antenna Configuration
In this section, we describe the transformation of a single antenna into a two-element orthogonally oriented MIMO antenna, as illustrated in Figure 7.This configuration serves to demonstrate the influence of element orientation on impedance matching and isolation between the antenna ports.The two antenna elements are placed on a common substrate with an edge-to-edge spacing of 3.5 mm.The mutual connection between the antenna elements has been observed in this configuration.To overcome the mutual coupling, we introduce a DGS with dimensions of 35 × 35 mm 2 for both antenna elements.The modification of the ground surface involves removing two circular rings at the center and excluding eight metal strips with a rotational orientation.This altered ground structure acts as a barrier, limiting electromagnetic coupling between the two antennas.
To enhance isolation further, we introduce a metal strip with a slotted ring-shaped structure between the antenna radiators, serving as an isolator.This slotted ring structure functions as a resonant element that impacts the currents on the antennas, thereby improving isolation.The MIMO antenna design boasts a compact size, straightforward structure, and cost-efficiency.We achieve wide-band operation by optimizing these parameters, covering the desired frequency range with three specific resonances at 28.5 GHz, 33 GHz, and 38.5 GHz.To enhance isolation further, we introduce a metal strip with a slotted ring-shaped structure between the antenna radiators, serving as an isolator.This slotted ring structure functions as a resonant element that impacts the currents on the antennas, thereby improving isolation.The MIMO antenna design boasts a compact size, straightforward structure, and cost-efficiency.We achieve wide-band operation by optimizing these parameters, covering the desired frequency range with three specific resonances at 28.5 GHz, 33 GHz, and 38.5 GHz.   3.

Parametric Analysis of MIMO Antenna
To optimize the performance of the MIMO antenna, three different MIMO arrangements are proposed, and the DGS is the same for all versions, as shown in Figure 9.Each arrangement has a specific placement associated with it.In Version 1 of the MIMO antenna, if we incorporate a complete ground layer, there are observed mutual coupling issues, as illustrated in Figure 10.This acts as a reflective surface for the electromagnetic waves emitted by the antenna elements.These reflected waves can interfere with the radiation patterns of the antenna elements themselves, leading to mutual coupling.With the full ground layer employed, the achieved isolation is less than −16 dB.However, when the DGS is introduced, the isolation significantly improves to less than −23 dB.

Parametric Analysis of MIMO Antenna
To optimize the performance of the MIMO antenna, three different MIMO arrangements are proposed, and the DGS is the same for all versions, as shown in Figure 9.Each arrangement has a specific placement associated with it.In Version 1 of the MIMO antenna, if we incorporate a complete ground layer, there are observed mutual coupling issues, as illustrated in Figure 10.This acts as a reflective surface for the electromagnetic waves emitted by the antenna elements.These reflected waves can interfere with the radiation patterns of the antenna elements themselves, leading to mutual coupling.With the full ground layer employed, the achieved isolation is less than −16 dB.However, when the DGS is introduced, the isolation significantly improves to less than −23 dB.  3.

Parametric Analysis of MIMO Antenna
To optimize the performance of the MIMO antenna, three different MIMO arra ments are proposed, and the DGS is the same for all versions, as shown in Figure 9. arrangement has a specific placement associated with it.In Version 1 of the MIMO tenna, if we incorporate a complete ground layer, there are observed mutual coup issues, as illustrated in Figure 10.This acts as a reflective surface for the electromag waves emitted by the antenna elements.These reflected waves can interfere with th diation patterns of the antenna elements themselves, leading to mutual coupling.With full ground layer employed, the achieved isolation is less than −16 dB.However, when DGS is introduced, the isolation significantly improves to less than −23 dB.The initial antenna design, referred to as Version 1 with DGS (Figure 9a), incor two arc-shaped microstrip antennas arranged linearly and separated by a 4.3 m This arrangement is crucial for MIMO systems, where minimizing interference b antennas is paramount.This alteration is grounded in the principles of electrom field behavior concerning distance.Specifically, the electromagnetic fields emitted antenna element decay more rapidly before reaching the other element, resultin duced mutual influence.As illustrated in Figure 9b, Version 2 takes things a step by orienting the radiating components perpendicular to each other.This config further mitigates mutual coupling, consequently enhancing the antenna's perfo When antennas are oriented at right angles to each other, their radiation patterns tinct, and their electromagnetic fields interfere less due to their orthogonal alignme diminishes the transfer of energy between the antennas.Moving to Version 3, a de is introduced between the perpendicularly aligned radiators, as depicted in Figure addition is aimed at optimizing and achieving peak performance for the MIMO a The decoupling structure actively redirects electromagnetic fields away from each ing element of the antenna.This is achieved through a meticulous design of the ge which generates resonance and field cancellation effects.These effects involve ma ing electromagnetic interference patterns and harnessing constructive and destru terference from fields.By strategically placing the decoupler between the perpend aligned radiators, the unwanted coupling is significantly minimized, resulting proved isolation and overall antenna performance.Version 3 represents the propo tenna design, featuring numerous enhancements that render it more efficient and e for both transmitting and receiving signals.
Figure 11a-d shows the performance metrics of the antenna, including the re coefficient (|S11|), transmission coefficient (|S21|), gain and Z-parameters, for a antenna versions.These metrics provide information about the behavior of ante various designs.In order to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the optim process, the comparative results of these three antenna versions (Version 1 to Ve are precisely summarized in Table 4.This tabular presentation of antenna desig one to understand the delicate improvements and trade-offs achieved through recapitulations.The initial antenna design, referred to as Version 1 with DGS (Figure 9a), incorporates two arc-shaped microstrip antennas arranged linearly and separated by a 4.3 mm gap.This arrangement is crucial for MIMO systems, where minimizing interference between antennas is paramount.This alteration is grounded in the principles of electromagnetic field behavior concerning distance.Specifically, the electromagnetic fields emitted by one antenna element decay more rapidly before reaching the other element, resulting in reduced mutual influence.As illustrated in Figure 9b, Version 2 takes things a step further by orienting the radiating components perpendicular to each other.This configuration further mitigates mutual coupling, consequently enhancing the antenna's performance.When antennas are oriented at right angles to each other, their radiation patterns are distinct, and their electromagnetic fields interfere less due to their orthogonal alignment.This diminishes the transfer of energy between the antennas.Moving to Version 3, a decoupler is introduced between the perpendicularly aligned radiators, as depicted in Figure 9c.This addition is aimed at optimizing and achieving peak performance for the MIMO antenna.The decoupling structure actively redirects electromagnetic fields away from each radiating element of the antenna.This is achieved through a meticulous design of the geometry, which generates resonance and field cancellation effects.These effects involve manipulating electromagnetic interference patterns and harnessing constructive and destructive interference from fields.By strategically placing the decoupler between the perpendicularly aligned radiators, the unwanted coupling is significantly minimized, resulting in improved isolation and overall antenna performance.Version 3 represents the proposed antenna design, featuring numerous enhancements that render it more efficient and effective for both transmitting and receiving signals.
Figure 11a-d shows the performance metrics of the antenna, including the reflection coefficient (|S11|), transmission coefficient (|S21|), gain and Z-parameters, for all three antenna versions.These metrics provide information about the behavior of antennas in various designs.In order to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the optimization process, the comparative results of these three antenna versions (Version 1 to Version 3) are precisely summarized in Table 4.This tabular presentation of antenna design helps one to understand the delicate improvements and trade-offs achieved through various recapitulations.barrier against unwanted current transfer between closely spaced antennas.This concept takes advantage of the complex interplay of wave phenomena to achieve improved separation and performance within a MIMO antenna system.By situating a decoupler between the MIMO antenna elements, the energy transmission is theoretically entirely suppressed.

Measurement Performance
The fabricated model of the proposed antenna is displayed in Figure 13a,b.The experimental results of the suggested antenna have been examined using an anechoic chamber and the VNA.To validate the measurement outcome of ||S11|| of the proposed antenna under test

Measurement Performance
The fabricated model of the proposed antenna is displayed in Figure 13a,b.The experimental results of the suggested antenna have been examined using an anechoic chamber and the VNA.

Measurement Performance
The fabricated model of the proposed antenna is displayed in Figure 13a,b.The experimental results of the suggested antenna have been examined using an anechoic chamber and the VNA.To validate the measurement outcome of ||S11|| of the proposed antenna under test (AUT), the use of VNA is presented in Figure 14.A comparison between simulated and measured outcomes was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the simulation model and to determine the level of agreement between the theoretical predictions and experimental results.To validate the measurement outcome of ||S11|| of the proposed antenna under test (AUT), the use of VNA is presented in Figure 14.A comparison between simulated and measured outcomes was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the simulation model and to determine the level of agreement between the theoretical predictions and experimenta results.The measured |S11| for the antenna was found to be better than 10 dB for frequencies of 24.8-40 GHz and the bandwidth is 15.2 GHz (PBW = 47.5%) which closely matched with the simulated result.The simulated and measured mutual coupling, |S21|, between the two input ports shows that the measured isolation was more than 27 dB (more than 30 dB during 27.1-35.8GHz) throughout the entire band.A mutual coupling level of less than 28 dB is adequate for MIMO applications throughout the entire frequency range.

Scattering Parameters
Figure 15a,b demonstrates the comparison of simulated and measured scattering rameters in terms of |S11| and |S21|, respectively, for the proposed antenna design.T measured |S11| for the antenna was found to be better than 10 dB for frequencies of 24 40 GHz and the bandwidth is 15.2 GHz (PBW = 47.5%) which closely matched with simulated result.The simulated and measured mutual coupling, |S21|, between the t input ports shows that the measured isolation was more than 27 dB (more than 30 during 27.1-35.8GHz) throughout the entire band.A mutual coupling level of less th 28 dB is adequate for MIMO applications throughout the entire frequency range.The antenna demonstrates satisfactory performance for mm wave applications, but minor discrepancies in performance were noted due to connector interfacing and fabrication constraints.

Z-Parameter
The Z-matrix, also referred to as the impedance matrix, holds a pivotal role in characterizing antennas within electromagnetic theory.The Z-matrix comprises real and imaginary components, where the real part pertains to resistive aspects associated with power dissipation during electromagnetic wave radiation, while the imaginary part accounts for the phase disparity between voltage and current in the antenna's impedance.Figure 16 illustrates simulated and measured antenna impedance manifests in the Z-matrix.Notably, the diagonal elements of the Z-matrix, denoted as Z11, signify the self-impedance of individual elements or points within the system.At resonance frequencies, the proposed antenna exhibits an impedance for its real part (Z11 real) that is approximately 50 Ω, while the imaginary part (Z11 img.) is nearly negligible, approaching zero.The antenna demonstrates satisfactory performance for mm wave applications, but minor discrepancies in performance were noted due to connector interfacing and fabrication constraints.

Z-Parameter
The Z-matrix, also referred to as the impedance matrix, holds a pivotal role in characterizing antennas within electromagnetic theory.The Z-matrix comprises real and imaginary components, where the real part pertains to resistive aspects associated with power dissipation during electromagnetic wave radiation, while the imaginary part accounts for the phase disparity between voltage and current in the antenna's impedance.Figure 16 illustrates simulated and measured antenna impedance manifests in the Z-matrix.Notably, the diagonal elements of the Z-matrix, denoted as Z11, signify the self-impedance of individual elements or points within the system.At resonance frequencies, the proposed antenna exhibits an impedance for its real part (Z11 real) that is approximately 50 Ω, while the imaginary part (Z11 img.) is nearly negligible, approaching zero.

Gain and Efficiency
The performance of the proposed MIMO antenna has been evaluated through simulations and measurements, and the obtained gain is presented in Figure 17a.The graph demonstrates that the antenna has achieved a remarkable gain of over 4.6 dB in the desired band.These values are in good agreement with the experimental value of gain, which is 4.4 dB, indicating that the proposed antenna design is effective and reliable.Figure 17b illustrates a comparison between simulated and measured radiation and total efficiency.In the simulation, the radiation efficiency is 9.5 dB (95%), whereas in practical measure-

Gain and Efficiency
The performance of the proposed MIMO antenna has been evaluated through simulations and measurements, and the obtained gain is presented in Figure 17a.The graph demonstrates that the antenna has achieved a remarkable gain of over 4.6 dB in the desired band.These values are in good agreement with the experimental value of gain, which is 4.4 dB, indicating that the proposed antenna design is effective and reliable.Figure 17b illustrates a comparison between simulated and measured radiation and total efficiency.In the simulation, the radiation efficiency is 9.5 dB (95%), whereas in practical measurements, it is slightly lower, at 9.5 dB (95%).Similarly, the simulated total efficiency stands at 8.4 dB (84%), with a measured value of approximately 8.3 dB (83%).The achieved performance of the antenna is significant, as it meets the desired specifications and can potentially enable high-speed wireless communication systems in the mm wave frequency range.

Radiation Patterns
A two-dimensional (2D) radiation pattern represents the directional characteristics of an antenna or other electromagnetic radiation source in a two-dimensional plane.Figure 18a-d

Radiation Patterns
A two-dimensional (2D) radiation pattern represents the directional characteristics of an antenna or other electromagnetic radiation source in a two-dimensional plane.The measurement setup is displayed in Figure 19 for measuring the radiation patterns.When Port 1 is activated and Port 2 is terminated with a 50 Ω load, the radiation patterns of the antenna (port 1) are compared in terms of co-polarization (xz-plane) and crosspolarization (yz-plane) features, which are commonly used to evaluate 2D plots.The radiation patterns of the xz-plane and yz-plane are far from each other, showing low mutual coupling.The significance of these patterns lies in their ability to provide valuable insights into the antenna's performance characteristics, including its ability to transmit and receive signals in different polarizations.

Diversity Characteristics
One way to measure the effectiveness of MIMO antennas is by evaluating their diversity, which can be assessed using two metrics: the ECC and DG.

Envelope Correlation Coefficient
ECC is an important parameter that determines the quality of the received signals and the overall system performance.A lower correlation coefficient between the antenna elements is desirable as it indicates greater diversity, which can lead to improved performance in MIMO systems.Theoretically, ECC can be estimated using Equation (3).The simulated and measured ECC is presented in Figure 20.The measured ECC is almost 0.0004, and the simulated value is 0.0016, within the acceptable threshold (i.e., less than 0.1) for the whole operating band for both ports.

Diversity Characteristics
One way to measure the effectiveness of MIMO antennas is by evaluating their diversity, which can be assessed using two metrics: the ECC and DG.

Envelope Correlation Coefficient
ECC is an important parameter that determines the quality of the received signals and the overall system performance.A lower correlation coefficient between the antenna elements is desirable as it indicates greater diversity, which can lead to improved performance in MIMO systems.Theoretically, ECC can be estimated using Equation (3).The simulated and measured ECC is presented in Figure 20.The measured ECC is almost 0.0004, and the simulated value is 0.0016, within the acceptable threshold (i.e., less than 0.1) for the whole operating band for both ports.

Diversity Characteristics
One way to measure the effectiveness of MIMO antennas is by evaluating their diversity, which can be assessed using two metrics: the ECC and DG.

Envelope Correlation Coefficient
ECC is an important parameter that determines the quality of the received signals and the overall system performance.A lower correlation coefficient between the antenna elements is desirable as it indicates greater diversity, which can lead to improved performance in MIMO systems.Theoretically, ECC can be estimated using Equation (3).The simulated and measured ECC is presented in Figure 20.The measured ECC is almost 0.0004, and the simulated value is 0.0016, within the acceptable threshold (i.e., less than 0.1) for the whole operating band for both ports.

Diversity Gain
DG refers to the improvement in signal quality achieved by utilizing multiple antennas at both the transmitter and receiver ends.It takes advantage of the spatial diversity for signal transmission and reception.Factors affecting DG include antenna count, spacing, and correlation.Increasing the number of antennas generally increases diversity gain, while larger spacing improves decorrelation and leads to higher gain.Figure 21 shows the simulated and measured diversity gain of the proposed antenna.It is observed from the measured outcomes that it exhibits a DG of almost 10 dB across its operating frequency band.Although the initial performance of both ports falls within the acceptable threshold, there is a slight reduction in the diversity gain to 9.992 dB in simulation outcomes, which is slightly below the ideal value of 10 dB.DG can also be determined using the ECC value in Equation ( 4).

Conclusions
This work presents the evolutionary development of an antenna system, transitioning from a single antenna configuration to a MIMO setup.The fundamental antenna structure comprises two identical arc-shaped patches with DGS and decoupling mechanisms.Three different orientations were examined to improve the performance and dependability of the MIMO antenna.The goals were to reduce mutual coupling, improve impedance matching, and improve radiation characteristics.The resultant antenna, integrated with a decoupling structure, demonstrates exceptional parameters.These include an impressive 15 GHz bandwidth spanning from 25 to 40 GHz, outstanding isolation exceeding 28 dB, a maximum simulated gain of 4.6 dB, an ECC of 0.0016, and a DG of 9.992 dB.Experimental validation of the antenna affirms these remarkable attributes, with a measured bandwidth of 15.2 GHz, isolation surpassing 28 dB, and a commendable gain of 4.4 dB.Notably, the antenna exhibits remarkable diversity performance in practical testing, boasting an ECC of 0.004 and a DG of 10 dB.While minor discrepancies stemming from fabrication errors and measurement inconsistencies may exist, the simulation and measurement results exhibit close alignment.This aligns with the proposed antenna design's suitability for integration into wireless communication systems.

Conclusions
This work presents the evolutionary development of an antenna system, transitioning from a single antenna configuration to a MIMO setup.The fundamental antenna structure comprises two identical arc-shaped patches with DGS and decoupling mechanisms.Three different orientations were examined to improve the performance and dependability of the MIMO antenna.The goals were to reduce mutual coupling, improve impedance matching, and improve radiation characteristics.The resultant antenna, integrated with a decoupling structure, demonstrates exceptional parameters.These include an impressive 15 GHz bandwidth spanning from 25 to 40 GHz, outstanding isolation exceeding 28 dB, a maximum simulated gain of 4.6 dB, an ECC of 0.0016, and a DG of 9.992 dB.Experimental validation of the antenna affirms these remarkable attributes, with a measured bandwidth of 15.2 GHz, isolation surpassing 28 dB, and a commendable gain of 4.4 dB.Notably, the antenna exhibits remarkable diversity performance in practical testing, boasting an ECC of 0.004 and a DG of 10 dB.While minor discrepancies stemming from fabrication errors and measurement inconsistencies may exist, the simulation and measurement results exhibit close alignment.This aligns with the proposed antenna design's suitability for integration into wireless communication systems.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Iterative design configuration of single antenna s.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Iterative design configuration of single antenna s.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Iterative design configuration of single antenna s.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Reflection coefficient |S11| of all four iterations for a single antenna.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Reflection coefficient |S11| of all four iterations for a single antenna.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Comparison of gain for each iteration.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Comparison of gain for each iteration.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(a) Variation of r (radius) of the arc-shaped patch at various values.(b) Variation of R1 (length of the rectangular stub) at various values.(c) Variation of R2 (width of the rectangular stub) at various values.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(a) Variation of r (radius) of the arc-shaped patch at various values.(b) Variation of R1 (length of the rectangular stub) at various values.(c) Variation of R2 (width of the rectangular stub) at various values.

Figure 8
Figure 8 represents symbols related to the dimensions of the antenna radiators, DGS, and decoupler, providing a visual representation of the antenna's physical layout.Parametric symbols and dimensions are presented in Table3.

Figure 8
Figure 8 represents symbols related to the dimensions of the antenna radiators, DGS, and decoupler, providing a visual representation of the antenna's physical layout.Parametric symbols and dimensions are presented in Table3.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Symbols for each antenna element with dimensions.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Parametric innovation of MIMO antenna with three antenna element orientations.(a) Linear alignment, (b) perpendicular configuration, and (c) perpendicular configuration with decoupler.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Symbols for each antenna element with dimensions.

Figure 8
Figure 8 represents symbols related to the dimensions of the antenna radiators, D and decoupler, providing a visual representation of the antenna's physical layout.P metric symbols and dimensions are presented in Table3.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Symbols for each antenna element with dimensions.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Parametric innovation of MIMO antenna with three antenna element orientations.(a ear alignment, (b) perpendicular configuration, and (c) perpendicular configuration with decou

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Parametric innovation of MIMO antenna with three antenna element orientations.(a) Linear alignment, (b) perpendicular configuration, and (c) perpendicular configuration with decoupler.

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.Fabricated model of proposed antenna.(a) Top surface and (b) bottom surface.

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.Fabricated model of proposed antenna.(a) Top surface and (b) bottom surface.

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.Fabricated model of proposed antenna.(a) Top surface and (b) bottom surface.

Figure 14 .
Figure 14.Antenna testing using VNA.6.1.Scattering Parameters Figure 15a,b demonstrates the comparison of simulated and measured scattering parameters in terms of |S11| and |S21|, respectively, for the proposed antenna design.The measured |S11| for the antenna was found to be better than 10 dB for frequencies of 24.8-40 GHz and the bandwidth is 15.2 GHz (PBW = 47.5%) which closely matched with the simulated result.The simulated and measured mutual coupling, |S21|, between the two input ports shows that the measured isolation was more than 27 dB (more than 30 dB during 27.1-35.8GHz) throughout the entire band.A mutual coupling level of less than 28 dB is adequate for MIMO applications throughout the entire frequency range.

6. 1 .
Figure 15a,b demonstrates the comparison of simulated and measured scattering parameters in terms of |S11| and |S21|, respectively, for the proposed antenna design.The measured |S11| for the antenna was found to be better than 10 dB for frequencies of 24.8-40 GHz and the bandwidth is 15.2 GHz (PBW = 47.5%) which closely matched with the simulated result.The simulated and measured mutual coupling, |S21|, between the two input ports shows that the measured isolation was more than 27 dB (more than 30 dB

Figure 17 .
Figure 17.(a) Gain of the proposed antenna.(b) Efficiency of the proposed antenna.

6. 4 .
Radiation Patterns A two-dimensional (2D) radiation pattern represents the directional characteristics of an antenna or other electromagnetic radiation source in a two-dimensional plane.Figure 18a-d presents the 2D radiation patterns of the proposed antenna (for Port 1).Simulated radiation patterns are obtained using CST software and measured inside an anechoic chamber at frequencies of 28.5 GHz, 33 GHz, 36 GHz, and 38.5 GHz.The measurement setup is displayed in Figure 19 for measuring the radiation patterns.When Port 1 is activated and Port 2 is terminated with a 50 Ω load, the radiation patterns of the antenna (port 1) are compared in terms of co-polarization (xz-plane) and cross-polarization (yz-plane) features, which are commonly used to evaluate 2D plots.The radiation patterns of the xz-plane and yz-plane are far from each other, showing low mutual coupling.The significance of these patterns lies in their ability to provide valuable insights into the antenna's performance characteristics, including its ability to transmit and receive signals in different polarizations.(a) Port 1 at 28.5 GHz (b) Port 1 at 33 GHz

Figure 17 .
Figure 17.(a) Gain of the proposed antenna.(b) Efficiency of the proposed antenna.

Figure 17 .
Figure 17.(a) Gain of the proposed antenna.(b) Efficiency of the proposed antenna.
Figure 18a-d presents the 2D radiation patterns of the proposed antenna (for Port 1).Simulated radiation patterns are obtained using CST software and measured inside an anechoic chamber at frequencies of 28.5 GHz, 33 GHz, 36 GHz, and 38.5 GHz.The measurement setup is displayed in Figure 19 for measuring the radiation patterns.When Port 1 is activated and Port 2 is terminated with a 50 Ω load, the radiation patterns of the antenna (port 1) are compared in terms of co-polarization (xz-plane) and cross-polarization (yz-plane) features, which are commonly used to evaluate 2D plots.The radiation patterns of the xz-plane and yz-plane are far from each other, showing low mutual coupling.The significance of these patterns lies in their ability to provide valuable insights into the antenna's performance characteristics, including its ability to transmit and receive signals in different polarizations.(a) Port 1 at 28.5 GHz (b) Port 1 at 33 GHz (c) Port 1 at 36 GHz (d) Port 1 at 38.5 GHz

Figure 18 .
Figure 18.Two-dimensional radiation patterns of MIMO antenna xz-plane and yz-plane.

Figure 19 .
Figure 19.Measurement setup inside the anechoic chamber.

7. 2 .
Diversity Gain DG refers to the improvement in signal quality achieved by utilizing multiple antennas at both the transmitter and receiver ends.It takes advantage of the spatial diversity

Figure 19 .
Figure 19.Measurement setup inside the anechoic chamber.

Figure 18 .
Figure 18.Two-dimensional radiation patterns of MIMO antenna xz-plane and yz-plane.

Figure 19 .
Figure 19.Measurement setup inside the anechoic chamber.

7. 2 .
Diversity Gain DG refers to the improvement in signal quality achieved by utilizing multiple antennas at both the transmitter and receiver ends.It takes advantage of the spatial diversity for signal transmission and reception.Factors affecting DG include antenna count, spac-

Table 1 .
Comparison of the proposed antenna design with the existing literature.

Table 2 .
Comparative advantages and demerits of proposed antenna with existing literature.

Table 3 .
Parametric symbols and dimensions.

Table 4 .
Comparative results of these three antenna versions.