Phloem-Mobile MYB44 Negatively Regulates Expression of PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER 1 in Arabidopsis Roots

Phosphorus (P) is an essential plant macronutrient; however, its availability is often limited in soils. Plants have evolved complex mechanisms for efficient phosphate (Pi) absorption, which are responsive to changes in external and internal Pi concentration, and orchestrated through local and systemic responses. To explore these systemic Pi responses, here we identified AtMYB44 as a phloem-mobile mRNA, an Arabidopsis homolog of Cucumis sativus MYB44, that is responsive to the Pi-starvation stress. qRT-PCR assays revealed that AtMYB44 was up-regulated and expressed in both shoot and root in response to Pi-starvation stress. The atmyb44 mutant displayed higher shoot and root biomass compared to wild-type plants, under Pi-starvation conditions. Interestingly, the expression of PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER1;2 (PHT1;2) and PHT1;4 was enhanced in atmyb44 in response to a Pi-starvation treatment. A split-root assay showed that AtMYB44 expression was systemically regulated under Pi-starvation conditions, and in atmyb44, systemic controls on PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 expression were moderately disrupted. Heterografting assays confirmed graft transmission of AtMYB44 transcripts, and PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 expression was decreased in heterografted atmyb44 rootstocks. Taken together, our findings support the hypothesis that mobile AtMYB44 mRNA serves as a long-distance Pi response signal, which negatively regulates Pi transport and utilization in Arabidopsis.


Introduction
Phosphorus (P) is an essential element that is involved in various functionalities in living organisms, including plants.Therefore, it is critical to ensure proper phosphorus nutrition for optimal plant growth and development, by supplying phosphate (Pi) fertilizers to maximize crop productivity in modern agriculture systems [1,2].However, soil-applied Pi fertilizer becomes rapidly immobilized, due to chemical reactions with cations (e.g., magnesium, calcium, aluminum, and iron) in both alkaline and acidic soils [3,4].This can limit the availability of applied Pi to the plant to around 20-30% for plant use [3,4].Furthermore, Pi is a finite and non-renewable resource; this has led to increased interest in understanding the mechanisms by which plants absorb and use Pi under limiting Pi conditions.Here, the goal is to develop elite plant lines with enhanced P acquisition and utilization efficiency traits [3][4][5][6][7].
Plants have evolved sophisticated adaptative mechanisms, which involve a range of physiological, morphological, biochemical, and molecular processes, to respond to low Pi conditions for efficient Pi foraging in soils [4,5,[8][9][10][11].These adaptative processes, known as phosphate starvation responses (PSRs), are categorized into local and systemic Pi responses as Pi sensing and long-distance signaling, and the adaptative efficiency can be determined by the PSR regulatory capacity in plants [6,10,12,13].
The local Pi responses are largely associated with traits for root growth, as they perceive the Pi level in the soil and determine the root developmental fate in response to the imposed Pi-starvation stress, whereas internal Pi concentration activates the systemic responses to integrate the Pi level information in distantly located plant tissues/organs [6,10,12,13].Systemic Pi responses play an important role in global P homeostasis within plants, and mi-croRNA399 (miR399) was the first identified long-distance regulatory component in Pi-stress signaling [14,15].Under Pi-starvation conditions, miR399 is expressed in shoots and delivered into roots via the phloem to mediate the degradation of PHO2 mRNA, which encodes an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme and regulates the level of high-affinity PHOSTPHATE TRANSPORTER1 (PHT1) protein in roots.Therefore, this systemic regulatory mechanism serves to control Pi acquisition under Pi-starvation stress conditions [6,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20].
MYB transcription factors (TFs), one of the largest TF families in plants, contain a conserved DNA-binding domain and up to three tandem repeats of helix-turn-helix domains, designated R1, R2 and R3 [21][22][23].In plants, MYB44, classified as a member of the R2R3-type MYB subfamily, has been characterized as a regulatory factor in various abiotic and biotic stress responses [24][25][26][27][28].It was earlier reported that MYB TFs are involved in the control of Pi-starvation responses in plants [28][29][30][31][32][33][34].PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE1 (PHR1) is a MYB-related TF, a key regulator in Pi-starvation responses [29].Arabidopsis MYB62, induced in response to Pi-stress, appears to function as a negative regulator for PSR gene expression and is involved in gibberellic acid biosynthesis [31].Another MYB-like TF, REGULATOR OF LEAF INCLINATION 1 (RLI1), interacts with SPX1 (Syg1/Pho81/XPR1), and the SPX1-RLI1 complex appears to block RLI1 binding to the promoter regions of RLI1 target genes, which are involved in elongation of leaf cells in the lamina joint in rice [33,34].Additionally, potato MYB44 functions as a negative regulator of PHOSPHATE1 (PHO1) expression, which encodes a major Pi transport protein that mediates Pi transport from the root to the shoot, through Pi loading into the xylem [28].However, it remains unknown whether MYB44 plays a role in systemic Pi responses.In this study, Arabidopsis MYB44, referred to as AtMYB44, was characterized as a phloem-mobile mRNA, and shown to be involved in systemic regulation of PHT1 (Pi transporter) gene expression in roots under Pi-starvation conditions.We propose that mobile AtMYB44 mRNA acts as a negative regulator in systemic Pi responses for control of Pi acquisition in Arabidopsis roots.

Identification of Mobile CsMYB44 Orthologs in Arabidopsis
In a previous study, cucumber was used as a model plant to examine the role of the phloem in systemic signaling under Pi-stress conditions [35].The phloem mRNA profiles changed dynamically, in response to an imposed Pi-stress treatment, and a range of graft-transmissible mRNAs were shown to target specific sink organs/tissues under Pistress conditions [35].The Cucumis sativus MYB44 (CsMYB44, Csa6G491690), encoding an R2R3 MYB transcription factor (TF), was among these Pi-stress-induced graft-transmissible mRNAs and was delivered into sink tissue during the early stage of Pi-stress treatment [35].Interestingly, even though 112 MYB family members were identified in cucumber, [36] and one specific clade included four other cucumber MYBs with CsMYB44 (Figure S1A), CsMYB44 (Csa6G491690) was detected as the only Pi-stress-responsive mobile mRNA, encoding for a MYB transcription factor [35].Based on our findings, we hypothesize that mobile CsMYB44 mRNA could serve as an early, long-distance signaling factor for systemic Pi responses.Thus, we selected CsMYB44 to further assess its role as a long-distance signaling mRNA in response to Pi-stress.
First, to facilitate the testing of our hypothesis that MYB44 plays a role in phloemmediated systemic signaling under Pi-starvation stress conditions, we conducted a phylogenetic analysis to identify putative CsMYB44 orthologs in Arabidopsis.A total of 132 Arabidopsis R2R3 MYB family members were analyzed (Figure S1B), and here, the phylogenetic tree analysis revealed the presence of CsMYB44 in a specific MYB subfamily subclade (Figures 1A and S1).AtMYB77, AtMYB73 and AtMYB70 shared an amino acid sequence identity of 69.0%, 59.5% and 57.8%, respectively, with AtMYB44.more, qRT-PCR analysis established that the transcript levels of AtMYB44, AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 were responsive to a Pi-stress treatment in both shoots and roots (Figure 1C,D).For AtMYB44 and AtMYB77, at least a two-fold increase and decrease in transcript levels, respectively, were detected in shoots, under Pi-stress conditions (Figure 1C).By contrast, AtMYB70 and AtMYB73 transcript levels in the shoots were only slightly changed in response to Pi-stress (10 µM Pi) (Figure 1C).In roots, the AtMYB44, AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 transcript levels were significantly increased under Pi-stress conditions (10 µM Pi) (Figure 1D).Taken together, our results demonstrate that the putative CsMYB44 homologs, AtMYB44, AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77, are regulated in response to the imposed Pi-stress treatment.Interestingly, the previous report provided evidence that AtMYB44 and AtMYB70 mRNA were mobile and, in particular, Pi-stress appeared to lead to phloem mobility of AtMYB44 mRNA in Arabidopsis [40].In addition, AtMYB44 transcript levels increased in both shoot and root (Figure 1C,D); therefore, we focused on investigating the role of AtMYB44 in Pi-stress systemic signaling.To gain insight into the regulation of the genes in this MYB subclade, we used the Arabidopsis cis-regulatory element database (https://agris-knowledgebase.org/AtcisDB;accessed on 4 February 2020) to analyze the promoter regions of AtMYB44, AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 with the aim to identify potential cis-elements that might serve to control their expression under Pi-stress conditions.Numerous Pi-starvation responsive (PSR) genes are regulated by PHR1, and the PHR1 binding site (P1BS) is enriched in the promoter regions of many Arabidopsis Pi-responsive genes [37][38][39].
Our cis-element analysis indeed revealed that P1BS motifs were located within the promoters of AtMYB44, AtMYB70 and AtMYB73, but not AtMYB77 (Figure 1B).Furthermore, qRT-PCR analysis established that the transcript levels of AtMYB44, AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 were responsive to a Pi-stress treatment in both shoots and roots (Figure 1C,D).For AtMYB44 and AtMYB77, at least a two-fold increase and decrease in transcript levels, respectively, were detected in shoots, under Pi-stress conditions (Figure 1C).By contrast, AtMYB70 and AtMYB73 transcript levels in the shoots were only slightly changed in response to Pi-stress (10 µM Pi) (Figure 1C).In roots, the AtMYB44, AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 transcript levels were significantly increased under Pi-stress conditions (10 µM Pi) (Figure 1D).Taken together, our results demonstrate that the putative CsMYB44 homologs, AtMYB44, AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77, are regulated in response to the imposed Pi-stress treatment.Interestingly, the previous report provided evidence that AtMYB44 and AtMYB70 mRNA were mobile and, in particular, Pi-stress appeared to lead to phloem mobility of AtMYB44 mRNA in Arabidopsis [40].In addition, AtMYB44 transcript levels increased in both shoot and root (Figure 1C,D); therefore, we focused on investigating the role of AtMYB44 in Pi-stress systemic signaling.

AtMYB44 Is Expressed in Leaf and Root Vascular Tissues under Pi-Stress Conditions
To further understand the mechanism of AtMYB44 regulation in Arabidopsis, we generated transgenic plants carrying the GFP-GUS reporter under the control of the native AtMYB44 promoter and analyzed the AtMYB44 expression pattern (Figure 2).Consistent with our qRT-PCR results (Figure 1C,D), the β-glucuronidase (GUS) staining assays showed signal in both shoots and roots, and revealed stronger staining under Pi-stress (10 µM) compared with Pi-sufficient conditions (500 µM) (Figure 2A,B), consistent with induction of AtMYB44 expression in response to Pi-stress.Here, AtMYB44 expression was detected in leaf lamina, leaf vasculature, root vasculature, root tips of primary and lateral roots, and in lateral root primordia (Figure 2B-J).Some mature lateral roots also exhibited GUS staining in the vascular tissue of elongation and maturation zones, but not the root tip (Figure 2H, compared with Figure 2G), suggesting that the expression of AtMYB44 would respond to Pi-starvation stress at the lateral root tips.Within the primary root tip, AtMYB44 was highly expressed in the epidermis, cortical layers and endodermis under Pi-starvation conditions (Figure 2K,L).In time-course experiments, the effects of Pi-starvation stress were confirmed on AtMYB44 expression in shoots and roots in Arabidopsis (Figures 2M,N and S2).These findings were consistent with the notion that AtMYB44 plays a role in transcriptional regulation of adaptive shoot and root development in response to Pi-stress treatment.

AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 Transcript Levels Were Elevated in atmyb44 Mutant, Compared with Wild-Type
As expression of other AtMYB family genes, close to CsMYB44, was also responsive to imposed Pi-stress (Figure 1D), we hypothesized that other redundant AtMYBs could compensate for the absence of AtMYB44 under Pi-stress conditions.To test this notion, we examined the expression levels of AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 in the atmyb44 mutant background under Pi-stress conditions using qRT-PCR (Figure 3).Here, we confirmed that the expression of AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 increased (Figure 3).Enhanced transcript levels of AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 were detected in atmyb44 plants under both Pi-sufficient and Pi-stress conditions, compared with WT (Figure 3).These assays supported a role for AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 in the functional compensation of AtMYB44 in its absence.

The atmyb44 Root Had an Elevated Pi Concentration under Pi-Stress Conditions
Under Pi-sufficient conditions, the atmyb44 mutant exhibited slightly longer primary roots and a higher number of lateral roots, compared with the WT and AtMYB44 overexpression (OX) lines, and, consistent with the previous study [25,41], AtMYB44 overexpression (OX) lines displayed shorter primary roots than WT (Figure S3A-C).However, under Pistress conditions, no significant differences in primary root growth were observed between WT, atmyb44 and AtMYB44 OX lines (Figure S3A,B).Interestingly, the lateral root numbers of AtMYB44 OX lines were lower than in WT and atmyb44 mutant lines, and this was observed in both Pi-sufficient and Pi-starvation conditions (Figure S3C).Under Pi-stress conditions, the atmyb44 plants did not exhibit a clear phenotypic difference in primary root growth and lateral root number, compared with WT (Figure S3).As both plant lines were grown on agar medium, which limited observation of plant developmental changes, to apply a prolonged Pi-stress, we next employed a hydroponic system to conduct phenotypic analysis of atmyb44 and AtMYB44 overexpression (OX) lines.In the experiments using the hydroponic system, we reduced the Pi concentration from 10 µM to 5 µM to ensure we were creating effective Pi-starvation treatments in hydroponics, where Pi is more available than in agar growth medium.AtMYB44 is expressed in response to Pi-starvation stress.Histochemical staining in 12day-old transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing the GFP-GUS reporter under the control of the AtMYB44 native promoter.Transgenic Arabidopsis seeds were germinated on solid medium with 500 µM Pi (Pi-sufficient medium) for 5 days and then transplanted to medium with 500 µM, or 10 µM Pi.Arabidopsis seedlings were collected 7 days after Pi-sufficient (500 µM), or Pi-starvation (10 µM) treatment.(A) GUS expression was barely detectable in Arabidopsis seedlings grown under Pisufficient (500 µM) conditions.(B) Under Pi-starvation (10 µM) conditions, GUS expression was observed in the primary root tip ((D), compared with (C) which showed GUS expression in the primary root tip under Pi-sufficient [500 µM] conditions), and Pi starvation also enhanced GUS expression in cotyledons (E), developing true leaves (F), lateral roots (G,H), and developing lateral root primordia (I,J).Dotted boxes indicate magnified regions for (C-J).Bars: 5 mm in (A,B), 500 µm in (E,F), and 50 µm in (C,D,G-J).In (K,L), AtMYB44 expression was increased in the epidermis, cortex layer and endodermis of the primary root tip under Pi-starvation (10 µM) conditions.In these representative confocal images, the GFP signal was enhanced in the primary root tip in response to the Pi starvation treatment (10 µM) (L) compared to growth on Pi-sufficient (500 µM) media (K) for 7 days.Arabidopsis seedling roots were stained with propidium iodide (PI, red).Epi, epidermis; cor, cortex layer; end, endodermis.Bar = 50 µm.(M,N): AtMYB44 expression was increased in both shoots (M) and roots (N) under Pi-starvation conditions.Arabidopsis seedlings (Col-0), germinated on agar medium with 500 µM Pi (Pi-sufficient medium) for 5 days, were transplanted to medium with 500 µM, or 10 µM Pi, and then collected over a 7-day time course of Pi-starvation treatment.The Arabidopsis Actin gene was used as an internal control to normalize the qRT-PCR results.The data are presented as mean ± SD (three biological replicates and three technical repeats).

Figure 2.
AtMYB44 is expressed in response to Pi-starvation stress.Histochemical staining in 12day-old transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing the GFP-GUS reporter under the control of the AtMYB44 native promoter.Transgenic Arabidopsis seeds were germinated on solid medium with 500 µM Pi (Pi-sufficient medium) for 5 days and then transplanted to medium with 500 µM, or 10 µM Pi.Arabidopsis seedlings were collected 7 days after Pi-sufficient (500 µM), or Pi-starvation (10 µM) treatment.(A) GUS expression was barely detectable in Arabidopsis seedlings grown under Pi-sufficient (500 µM) conditions.(B) Under Pi-starvation (10 µM) conditions, GUS expression was observed in the primary root tip ((D), compared with (C) which showed GUS expression in the primary root tip under Pi-sufficient [500 µM] conditions), and Pi starvation also enhanced GUS expression in cotyledons (E), developing true leaves (F), lateral roots (G,H), and developing lateral root primordia (I,J).Dotted boxes indicate magnified regions for (C-J).Bars: 5 mm in (A,B), 500 µm in (E,F), and 50 µm in (C,D,G-J).In (K,L), AtMYB44 expression was increased in the epidermis, cortex layer and endodermis of the primary root tip under Pi-starvation (10 µM) conditions.In these representative confocal images, the GFP signal was enhanced in the primary root tip in response to the Pi starvation treatment (10 µM) (L) compared to growth on Pi-sufficient (500 µM) media (K) for 7 days.Arabidopsis seedling roots were stained with propidium iodide (PI, red).Epi, epidermis; cor, cortex layer; end, endodermis.Bar = 50 µm.(M,N): AtMYB44 expression was increased in both shoots (M) and roots (N) under Pi-starvation conditions.Arabidopsis seedlings (Col-0), germinated on agar medium with 500 µM Pi (Pi-sufficient medium) for 5 days, were transplanted to medium with 500 µM, or 10 µM Pi, and then collected over a 7-day time course of Pi-starvation treatment.The Arabidopsis Actin gene was used as an internal control to normalize the qRT-PCR results.The data are presented as mean ± SD (three biological replicates and three technical repeats).
examined the expression levels of AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 in the atmyb44 mutant background under Pi-stress conditions using qRT-PCR (Figure 3).Here, we confirmed that the expression of AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 increased (Figure 3).Enhanced transcript levels of AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 were detected in atmyb44 plants under both Pi-sufficient and Pi-stress conditions, compared with WT (Figure 3).These assays supported a role for AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 in the functional compensation of AtMYB44 in its absence.

The atmyb44 Root Had an Elevated Pi Concentration under Pi-Stress Conditions
Under Pi-sufficient conditions, the atmyb44 mutant exhibited slightly longer primary roots and a higher number of lateral roots, compared with the WT and AtMYB44 overexpression (OX) lines, and, consistent with the previous study [25,41], AtMYB44 overexpression (OX) lines displayed shorter primary roots than WT (Figure S3A-C).However, under Pi-stress conditions, no significant differences in primary root growth were observed between WT, atmyb44 and AtMYB44 OX lines (Figure S3A,B).Interestingly, the lateral root numbers of AtMYB44 OX lines were lower than in WT and atmyb44 mutant lines, and this was observed in both Pi-sufficient and Pi-starvation conditions (Figure S3C).Under Pistress conditions, the atmyb44 plants did not exhibit a clear phenotypic difference in primary root growth and lateral root number, compared with WT (Figure S3).As both plant lines were grown on agar medium, which limited observation of plant developmental changes, to apply a prolonged Pi-stress, we next employed a hydroponic system to conduct phenotypic analysis of atmyb44 and AtMYB44 overexpression (OX) lines.In the experiments using the hydroponic system, we reduced the Pi concentration from 10 µM to Compared to WT, around a 1.2-fold higher and a 1.5-fold lower shoot biomass was observed in the atmyb44 and AtMYB44 OX plants, respectively, under Pi-sufficient conditions, although no significant difference in shoot biomass was detected under Pi-stress conditions (Figures 4A and S4A).However, the root biomass was obviously at least 1.5-fold higher in atmyb44 than WT and AtMYB44 OXs, under both Pi-sufficient and Pi-stress conditions (Figures 4B and S4B).In atmyb44, the Pi concentration was around 2-fold higher in shoots and 1.5-fold lower in roots compared to the level in WT under Pi-sufficient conditions.In contrast, the root Pi concentration in atmyb44 was around 2-fold higher than WT under Pi-stress conditions, even though no significant difference in shoot Pi concentration was detected between WT and atmyb44 (Figure 4C,D).Taken together, these results suggested that AtMYB44 functions as a negative regulator in both shoot and root development under Pi-sufficient conditions and that an absence of AtMYB44 might increase Pi uptake into Arabidopsis roots.
To test this hypothesis, we examined the expression level of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 in WT, atmyb44 and AtMYB44 OX-1 roots, using qRT-PCR (Figure 5).The expression levels of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 were much higher in atmyb44 under Pi-stress conditions compared to WT (two-to four-fold higher expression; Figure 5), and the increased levels of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 in atmyb44 were diminished in AtMYB44 OX-1 (Figure 5A,B).We did not detect any significant differences in the expression levels of PHT1;2 in AtMYB44 OX-1, compared with WT (Figure 5A).The Type B MONOGALACTOSYL DIACYLGLYCEROL SYNTHASE Plants 2023, 12, 3617 7 of 19 3 (MGD3) has been reported as a Pi-starvation response gene [51]; however, it was not predicted to be a AtMYB44 target (Table S2).Compared with the expression patterns of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4, no significant difference in MGD3 expression was observed between WT, atmyb44 and AtMYB44 OX-1 (Figure 5C).It is plausible that AtMYB44 might target the promoter of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4, where it acts as a negative regulator.
observed in the atmyb44 and AtMYB44 OX plants, respectively, under Pi-sufficient conditions, although no significant difference in shoot biomass was detected under Pi-stress conditions (Figures 4A and S4A).However, the root biomass was obviously at least 1.5fold higher in atmyb44 than WT and AtMYB44 OXs, under both Pi-sufficient and Pi-stress conditions (Figures 4B and S4B).In atmyb44, the Pi concentration was around 2-fold higher in shoots and 1.5-fold lower in roots compared to the level in WT under Pi-sufficient conditions.In contrast, the root Pi concentration in atmyb44 was around 2-fold higher than WT under Pi-stress conditions, even though no significant difference in shoot Pi concentration was detected between WT and atmyb44 (Figure 4C,D).Taken together, these results suggested that AtMYB44 functions as a negative regulator in both shoot and root development under Pi-sufficient conditions and that an absence of AtMYB44 might increase Pi uptake into Arabidopsis roots.tect any significant differences in the expression levels of PHT1;2 in AtMYB44 OX-1, compared with WT (Figure 5A).The Type B MONOGALACTOSYL DIACYLGLYCEROL SYN-THASE 3 (MGD3) has been reported as a Pi-starvation response gene [51]; however, it was not predicted to be a AtMYB44 target (Table S2).Compared with the expression patterns of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4, no significant difference in MGD3 expression was observed between WT, atmyb44 and AtMYB44 OX-1 (Figure 5C).It is plausible that AtMYB44 might target the promoter of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4, where it acts as a negative regulator.

Mobile AtMYB44 mRNA Functions as a Negative Regulator of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 Expression
We demonstrated that AtMYB44 expression responds to Pi-stress (Figure 1C,D) and AtMYB44 appears to play a role in regulating PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 expression under these conditions (Figure 5).As AtMYB44 was identified as a mobile CsMYB44 ortholog in Arabidopsis (Figure 1A), it is plausible that AtMYB44 could serve as a long-distance signal to exert control over Pi-starvation responses in Arabidopsis.To test whether AtMYB44 acts as a systemic signal in response to Pi-stress, we employed a split-root system to test whether AtMYB44-mediated gene expression is a systemic or local response under Pi-stress conditions.The Arabidopsis root systems grown in the hydroponic culture system were separated into two parts with each half of the root system placed into a vessel containing nutrient solution with Pi (200 µM) or with no Pi (0 µM).As the control, both vessels for each half of the root system on a plant contained the same nutrient solution (CP200 for 200 µM Pi, CP0 for 0 µM) to mimic plant growth under homogenous Pi-sufficient or deficient conditions (Figure 6A) [12].
Total RNA was extracted from these roots for qRT-PCR analysis.First, we investigated regulation of AtMYB44 expression to see if it is part of a systemic response, after Pi-sufficient and deficient treatments were applied to different halves of the root system on individual plants area (Figure 6).As expected, no AtMYB44 transcript was detected in atmyb44 tissues, and AtMYB44 expression in WT was enhanced in response to the imposed Pi-stress (CP0), compared with the mRNA level under Pi-sufficient conditions (CP200) (Figure 6B).In WT, a higher level of AtMYB44 mRNA was detected in that half of a plant's root system placed in the compartment with 200 µM Pi (SP200), relative to the control (CP200).In addition, lower AtMYB44 mRNA levels were observed for the split root system in 0 µM Pi (SP0) compared to the transcript level in the homogenously Pi-deficient control (CP0) (Figure 6B).These findings support our hypothesis that AtMYB44 serves as a systemic regulator.
Next, we examined systemic regulation of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 expression in AtMYB44 knockout mutants again using this split-root system to test whether AtMYB44 serves as a factor in systemic PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 regulation.Here, the qRT-PCR analysis revealed that, consistent with the previous report [12], expression of both PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 in WT plants was downregulated in roots within the SP0 container, compared to PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 expression in CP0 in WT (Figure 6C,D).However, in atmyb44 plants, the enhanced transcript levels of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 were decreased in SP0 compared to CP0 (Figure 6C,D).Taken together, these results suggest that AtMYB44 expression is regulated in a systemic manner, and that other long-distance regulators might be involved in the systemic regulation of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 regulation in the atmyb44 background.To investigate whether AtMYB44 mRNA acts as a long-distance regulator for control over PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 expression, we performed micrografting assays between atmyb44 and AtMYB44 OX-1 lines (Figure 7A).Here, our RT-PCR analyses revealed that, as controls, AtMYB44 expression was increased in AtMYB44 OX-1, but not in atmyb44, and AtMYB44 OX-1 and atmyb44 were subsequently used as shoot scions or root stocks (Figure 7B).Analysis of these grafted tissues revealed that the transgene AtMYB44 was detected in rootstocks of heterografted AtMYB44 OX-1 (scion)/atmyb44 (rootstock), but not in the atmyb44 (scion)/ AtMYB44 OX-1 (rootstock), consistent with AtMYB44 mRNA being phloem-mobile from source to sink tissues (Figure 7B).Interestingly, the level of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 expression was decreased in the rootstocks of these heterografted AtMYB44 OX-1 (scion)/atmyb44 (rootstock) plants, compared to the atmyb44 homograft (Figure 7C).These data support the hypothesis that AtMYB44 mRNA acts as a mobile, negatively acting regulator of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 expression in Arabidopsis roots.

Discussion
The local and systemic regulatory mechanisms acting in Pi acquisition and distribution under Pi-stress conditions have been extensively studied, and many important genes have been identified as crucial components that regulate Pi homeostasis in plants, such as Arabidopsis and rice [4][5][6]29,48,50,52,53].However, limited information is available on the nature of the systemic Pi-signaling agents that control Pi homeostasis at the whole-plant level [6,14,15,17,35,[54][55][56][57].In this study, we identified AtMYB44 mRNA as a potential mobile systemic Pi-signaling component in Arabidopsis.

AtMYB44 Expression Responds to an Imposed Pi-Stress
Four homologs of CsMYB44 were identified as potential CsMYB44 orthologs in Arabidopsis (Figures 1A and S1), and their expression patterns were also responsive to an imposed Pi-stress (Figure 1B-D).As the promoter regions of AtMYB44, AtMYB70 and AtMYB73, but not AtMYB77, included PIBS motifs, this suggested that AtMYB44, At-MYB70 and AtMYB73 expression could be regulated in a PHR1-dependent manner under Pi-stress conditions.
An increase in the level of AtMYB44 expression during Pi-starvation treatment and detection of GUS signals within the vascular tissues of both shoot and root (Figure 2) suggested that AtMYB44 could function within the vasculature in response to Pi-starvation stress.In addition, we also observed that AtMYB44 expression was strongly detected in the root tips and lateral root primordia (Figure 2D,G-L).Based on our in silico analysis, the AtMYB44 TF could be associated with the promoter regions of many AUXIN RESPONSE FACTORs (ARFs), which contribute to control over PHR1 expression in Arabidopsis roots under Pi-starvation conditions [58,59] (Table S2).As AtMYB44 expression is responsive to auxin levels in the root [60], AtMYB44 may participate in auxin-dependent root development in response to Pi-stress.
AtMYB44, AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 share high structural similarity and participate in root system development [24,61,62].Interestingly, we detected enhanced expression of AtMYB70, AtMYB73, and AtMYB77 in atmyb44 plants, compared with WT (Figure 3).It was earlier proposed that AtMYB44 is a functional paralog of AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 for auxin-mediated lateral root growth and development [61].Even though the functional redundancy of AtMYB70 with AtMYB44 in root growth has not yet been examined, it is implicit that AtMYB70, AtMYB73 and AtMYB77 are redundant with AtMYB44 to coordinate adaptive root development under Pi-stress conditions.
As a previous report shows [25], the atmyb44 root appears to have slightly enhanced root growth performance under both Pi-sufficient and Pi-stress conditions compared to WT (Figures 4A,B, S3 and S4).One proposed AtMYB44 function is as a negative regulator in abscisic acid (ABA) responses, which are involved in root growth inhibition [25,63,64].AtMYB44 interacts with PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE 1-LIKE 8 (PYL8), identified as an ABA receptor, to regulate early ABA signaling and promote lateral root growth [25,61].ABA signaling can play a role in enhancing the promoter activity of various auxin-responsive genes [64].Although limited information is available regarding the role of ABA in Pistarvation responses [65], it is plausible that AtMYB44 might inhibit ABA responses and activate auxin signaling to enhance root development in response to the imposed Pi-stress.However, our AtMYB44 OX lines did not show a clearly opposite phenotype with the atmyb44 line under Pi-stress, even though, based on the previous report, the expression level of MYB44 was 23-and 12-fold higher in AtMYB44 OX-1 and 2 lines compared with WT [25,33] (Figures 4, S3 and S4).This result could not be explained as a role of AtMYB44 in Pi-starvation signaling; however, as AtMYB44 has been proposed to be involved in multiple signaling pathways, ectopic expression of AtMYB44 might result in aberrant ABA and auxin signaling to establish unidentified molecular responses under these Pi-stress conditions.

AtMYB44 mRNA Acts as a Systemic Pi Signaling Factor to Negatively Regulate Root Pi Transport Systems
In this study, we provide insight into the function of AtMYB44 as a negative regulator in systemic responses to Pi-stress, which might be associated with the promoter regions of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 (Table S2).Enhanced PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 expression and elevated soluble Pi concentration were detected in atmyb44 plants, compared to WT (Figures 4C,D and 5).It is noticeable that the soluble Pi concentration was higher in shoots and lower in roots of the atmyb44 mutant under Pi-sufficient conditions, compared with WT (Figure 4C,D).This suggests that, in Arabidopsis, AtMYB44 plays a negative role in root-to-shoot Pi transport under Pi-sufficient conditions.Hence, Pi translocation through the xylem might be enhanced in atmyb44 plants.Future research is needed to provide relevant evidence to verify the detailed binding mechanisms between AtMYB44 and the promoter regions of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 under both Pi-sufficient and Pi-starvation conditions.
Interestingly, under Pi-stress conditions, although a similar level of soluble Pi concentration was detected in the shoots of WT and atmyb44, its level was higher in atmyb44 roots, and this result seems to be correlated with increased root biomass (Figures 4 and S3).Additionally, shoot biomass of atmyb44 was significantly elevated under Pi-sufficient, but not Pi-limiting conditions (Figure 4).It is possible that AtMYB44 functions in roots as a negative regulator of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 (Figure 5); thus, enhanced levels of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 would increase the efficiency of Pi uptake and plant growth performance in atmyb44 plants under Pi-stress conditions.Taken together, it appears that AtMYB44 might play a negative role in Pi transport from root to shoot under Pi-sufficient conditions, but during a Pi-stress treatment, it might act as a negative regulator on Pi uptake in Arabidopsis.
In our study, we propose that mobile AtMYB44 mRNA serves as a long-distance phloem-based signal in the Pi-stress response (Figure 7).Although AtMYB44 lacked modified base 5-methylcytosine (m5C), CU-or tRNA-like motifs, which have been characterized as contributing to phloem mRNA mobility [79][80][81], our heterografting assay established the mobility of AtMYB44 mRNA in Arabidopsis (Figures 7 and S5).As AtMYB44 and CsMYB44 protein have not been detected in the phloem exudate [82,83], it is likely that AtMYB44 mRNA and not protein serves as the signaling agent in Pi homeostasis.Although mobile AtMYB44 mRNA is involved in regulating PHT1 expression, in roots, the regulatory mechanism underlying its phloem mobility, in Pi acquisition and utilization, remains to be elucidated.Based on previous studies [80,81], the shoot-derived AtMYB44 mRNA could be transported through the phloem and then translated in the targeted root tissues to regulate Pi transport.
Our study showed enhanced AtMYB44 expression under Pi-stress conditions, and a negative role for AtMYB44 in PHT1 expression in Arabidopsis roots (Figure 8).As an increase in both AtMYB44 and PHT1 expression was detected under Pi-stress, this raises the question as to why plants would enhance AtMYB44 expression to repress the Pi transport system under Pi-stress conditions, even though one would expect these plants to increase their Pi uptake capacity to adapt under limited Pi input.Mobile AtMYB44 mRNA might play a role in fine-tuning the regulation of Pi homeostasis in response to Pi-stress for control over the energy balance between adaptive plant development and Pi uptake (Figure 8).Our current findings provide insight into plant Pi-stress regulatory pathways and further studies will be required to reveal the molecular mechanism by which such mobile AtMYB44 mRNA effect the ability of the plant to acquire and utilize Pi during Pi-stress conditions.Such information would be of value in genetic engineering of crops for improved yield performance under reduced Pi fertilizer applications.

Plant Materials
Arabidopsis plants were grown in controlled environment chambers under long-day conditions (16 h light/8 h dark, 120-150 µmol m −2 s −1 of photosynthetically active

Growth Conditions and Pi-Stress Treatments
Arabidopsis plant lines were grown on solid medium (pH 5.7), in sand, or in a hydroponic culture system, as described previously [35,84,[86][87][88][89].In brief, Arabidopsis seeds were sterilized, germinated on solid medium with 500 µM NH 4 H 2 PO 4 and then, at 7 days after germination (DAG), they were transferred onto fresh medium or medium with (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 that partially or completely replaced NH 4 H 2 PO 4 .For hydroponically grown Arabidopsis plants, the tip of a 10 µL pipette was cut and then filled with 0.7% (w/v) agar, upon which sterilized seeds were sown, prior to setting them up on a floating board system.Hydroponic solution was replaced every 5 days.The solution for Pi-sufficient and starvation treatment contained 200 µM and 5 µM of NH 4 H 2 PO 4 , respectively.For growing Arabidopsis plants in sand, seeds were germinated on solid medium with 500 µM (Pisufficient) or 10 µM (Pi-starvation) of NH 4 H 2 PO 4 for 14 days, followed by transplanting to silica sand.Arabidopsis plants were further grown in silica sand for 14 days with nutrient solution, which contained 500 µM (Pi-sufficient) or 10 µM (Pi-starvation) of NH 4 H 2 PO 4 , supplied to the roots.Images of root system architecture were captured with a Nikon D7200 (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) digital camera.Acquired images were processed and analyzed using ImageJ software (version 1.53), as described previously [89].
Shoot and root tissues were collected from hydroponically cultured Arabidopsis plants and were used to measure biomass and Pi concentration, as described previously [86,87].Collected shoot and root tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen after measurement of fresh weight and then homogenized using a bead beater.Ground samples were digested with 5 M H 2 SO 4 , and then Pi concentrations were determined using a continuous flow analyzer (Skalar, Breda, The Netherlands), following the manufacturer's instructions.
Four-week-old Arabidopsis plants were used for the split-root assays, as described previously [12,90], with modifications.Arabidopsis roots were divided into two parts and then immersed in two separate compartments, which contained either the same nutrient solution with 200 µM Pi (CP200) or 0 µM Pi (CP0), or a different nutrient solution with 200 µM Pi (SP200) and 0 µM Pi (SP0), for 7 days [12,90].

Phylogenetic Analysis
The amino acid sequences of AtMYBs were obtained from the Arabidopsis Information Resource Database (https://www.arabidopsis.org/,4 November 2019) and aligned using MEGA 11 software.The phylogenetic tree was constructed using a neighbor-joining (NJ) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

β-Glucuronidase (GUS) Histochemical Analysis and Confocal Microscopy
The 2916 bp upstream region, which was from the ATG start codon of AtMYB44, was amplified from genomic DNA of Arabidopsis WT (Col-0), using the primer set listed in Table S1.The fragment was then inserted into the TOPO-D vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by an LR clonase reaction (Invitrogen), to subclone the AtMYB44 promoter into pBGWFS7.The construct was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 to generate transgenic Arabidopsis plants.The GUS staining of transgenic plants, carrying a GUS reporter gene under the control of the AtMYB44 native promoter, was conducted, as described previously [84].In brief, 12-day-old transgenic plants were immersed in 50 mM of sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) with 1 mM K 3 Fe(CN) 6 ,

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.AtMYB44 is a potential functional homolog of CsMYB44.(A) The clade, which includes the closest MYB homologs of CsMYB44, in the phylogenic tree of the Arabidopsis MYB family, is

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.AtMYB44 is a potential functional homolog of CsMYB44.(A) The clade, which includes the closest MYB homologs of CsMYB44, in the phylogenic tree of the Arabidopsis MYB family, is shown in Figure S1.Numbers above the phylogenetic tree indicate posterior probabilities.(B) P1BSs, which are PHR1 binding motifs, predicted in the promoter regions of AtMYB44, AtMYB70 and AtMYB73, but not AtMYB77.Red bars indicate the P1BS motifs.(C,D) Relative expression of AtMYB44, AtMYB70, AtMYB73, and AtMYB77 in the shoot (C) and the root (D), under Pi-sufficient (500 µM) and Pi-starvation (10 µM) conditions.Arabidopsis seedlings were transplanted onto the medium with 500 µM, or 10 µM Pi, 5 days after germination on solid medium with 500 µM Pi.Shoot and root samples of Arabidopsis plants were harvested 7 days after Pi-sufficient (500 µM), or Pi-starvation (10 µM) treatment.Arabidopsis Actin was used as an internal control to normalize the qRT-PCR results.The data are presented as mean ± SD (three technical replicates and three technical repeats).Asterisks indicate significantly different values between Pi-sufficient and Pi-starvation conditions (Student's t-test, p < 0.05).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2.AtMYB44 is expressed in response to Pi-starvation stress.Histochemical staining in 12day-old transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing the GFP-GUS reporter under the control of the AtMYB44 native promoter.Transgenic Arabidopsis seeds were germinated on solid medium with 500 µM Pi (Pi-sufficient medium) for 5 days and then transplanted to medium with 500 µM, or 10 µM Pi.Arabidopsis seedlings were collected 7 days after Pi-sufficient (500 µM), or Pi-starvation (10 µM) treatment.(A) GUS expression was barely detectable in Arabidopsis seedlings grown under Pisufficient (500 µM) conditions.(B) Under Pi-starvation (10 µM) conditions, GUS expression was observed in the primary root tip ((D), compared with (C) which showed GUS expression in the primary root tip under Pi-sufficient [500 µM] conditions), and Pi starvation also enhanced GUS expression in cotyledons (E), developing true leaves (F), lateral roots (G,H), and developing lateral root primordia (I,J).Dotted boxes indicate magnified regions for (C-J).Bars: 5 mm in (A,B), 500 µm in (E,F), and 50 µm in (C,D,G-J).In (K,L), AtMYB44 expression was increased in the epidermis, cortex layer and endodermis of the primary root tip under Pi-starvation (10 µM) conditions.In these representative confocal images, the GFP signal was enhanced in the primary root tip in response to the Pi starvation treatment (10 µM) (L) compared to growth on Pi-sufficient (500 µM) media (K) for 7 days.Arabidopsis seedling roots were stained with propidium iodide (PI, red).Epi, epidermis; cor, cortex layer; end, endodermis.Bar = 50 µm.(M,N): AtMYB44 expression was increased in both shoots (M) and roots (N) under Pi-starvation conditions.Arabidopsis seedlings (Col-0), germinated on agar medium with 500 µM Pi (Pi-sufficient medium) for 5 days, were transplanted to medium with 500 µM, or 10 µM Pi, and then collected over a 7-day time course of Pi-starvation treatment.The Arabidopsis Actin gene was used as an internal control to normalize the qRT-PCR results.The data are presented as mean ± SD (three biological replicates and three technical repeats).

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Transcript levels of AtMYB70, AtMYB73, and AtMYB77 are enhanced in atmyb44 knockout mutants.Relative expression levels of AtMYB70 (A), AtMYB73 (B), and AtMYB77 (C) in WT (Col-0) and the atmyb44 mutant under Pi-sufficient (500 µM) and Pi-starvation (10 µM) conditions.Arabidopsis seedlings were transplanted onto medium with 500 µM, or 10 µM Pi 5 days after germination on solid medium with 500 µM Pi.Arabidopsis seedlings were harvested 7 days after Pi-sufficient (500 µM) or Pi-starvation (10 µM) treatment.Arabidopsis Actin was used as an internal control to normalize the qRT-PCR results.The data are presented as mean ± SD (three technical replicates and three technical repeats).The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in relative gene expression levels, determined by the Tukey's test (p < 0.05).

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Transcript levels of AtMYB70, AtMYB73, and AtMYB77 are enhanced in atmyb44 knockout mutants.Relative expression levels of AtMYB70 (A), AtMYB73 (B), and AtMYB77 (C) in WT (Col-0) and the atmyb44 mutant under Pi-sufficient (500 µM) and Pi-starvation (10 µM) conditions.Arabidopsis seedlings were transplanted onto medium with 500 µM, or 10 µM Pi 5 days after germination on solid medium with 500 µM Pi.Arabidopsis seedlings were harvested 7 days after Pi-sufficient (500 µM) or Pi-starvation (10 µM) treatment.Arabidopsis Actin was used as an internal control to normalize the qRT-PCR results.The data are presented as mean ± SD (three technical replicates and three technical repeats).The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in relative gene expression levels, determined by the Tukey's test (p < 0.05).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. AtMYB44 functions in plant growth under Pi-starvation conditions.(A) Shoot and (B) root biomass measurements on four-week-old Col-0, atmyb44, AtMYB44 OX-1 and OX2 lines, grown inFigure 4. AtMYB44 functions in plant growth under Pi-starvation conditions.(A) Shoot and (B) root biomass measurements on four-week-old Col-0, atmyb44, AtMYB44 OX-1 and OX2 lines, grown in a hydroponic culture system with high (200 µM) and low (5 µM) Pi concentrations.Shoot and root biomass was examined as fresh weight for each Arabidopsis plant.Soluble Pi concentration in (C) shoot and (D) root of four-week-old Col-0, atmyb44, AtMYB44 OX-1 and OX2 plants grown in a hydroponic culture system with high (200 µM) and low (5 µM) Pi concentrations.The data are presented as mean ± SD (three technical replicates and three technical repeats).The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in biomass (A,B) and soluble Pi concentration (C,D), determined by the Tukey's test (p < 0.05).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. AtMYB44 functions in plant growth under Pi-starvation conditions.(A) Shoot and (B) root biomass measurements on four-week-old Col-0, atmyb44, AtMYB44 OX-1 and OX2 lines, grown inFigure 4. AtMYB44 functions in plant growth under Pi-starvation conditions.(A) Shoot and (B) root biomass measurements on four-week-old Col-0, atmyb44, AtMYB44 OX-1 and OX2 lines, grown in a hydroponic culture system with high (200 µM) and low (5 µM) Pi concentrations.Shoot and root biomass was examined as fresh weight for each Arabidopsis plant.Soluble Pi concentration in (C) shoot and (D) root of four-week-old Col-0, atmyb44, AtMYB44 OX-1 and OX2 plants grown in a hydroponic culture system with high (200 µM) and low (5 µM) Pi concentrations.The data are presented as mean ± SD (three technical replicates and three technical repeats).The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in biomass (A,B) and soluble Pi concentration (C,D), determined by the Tukey's test (p < 0.05).

Plants 2023 , 20 Figure 6 .
Figure 6.AtMYB44 is a systemically regulated gene in response to an imposed Pi-starvation stress.Expression of endogenous AtMYB44 in roots of four-week-old WT (Col-0) and atmyb44 plants grown in split-root systems.(A) Schematic diagram illustrating the experimental design to detect systemic or local signaling under Pi-starvation conditions using a split-root system.CP200 and CP0 indicate homogenous Pi-sufficient (200 µM) and deficient (0 µM) treatment on roots, respectively.SP200 and SP0 indicate the half of the root system on a plant supplied with Pi-sufficient (200 µM) or deficient (0 µM) treatment, respectively.Arabidopsis roots were harvested 7 days after transferring plants into the split-root systems.(B) AtMYB44 expression is systemically regulated.AtMYB44 expression was examined in WT (Col-0) and atmyb44, using a split-root system.(C) PHT1;2 and (D) PHT1;4 expression in WT (Col-0) and atmyb44 using a split-root system.Arabidopsis Actin was used as an internal control to normalize the qRT-PCR results.The data are presented as mean ± SD (three technical replicates and three technical repeats).The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in relative gene expression levels, determined by Tukey's test (p < 0.05).

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.AtMYB44 is a systemically regulated gene in response to an imposed Pi-starvation stress.Expression of endogenous AtMYB44 in roots of four-week-old WT (Col-0) and atmyb44 plants grown in split-root systems.(A) Schematic diagram illustrating the experimental design to detect systemic or local signaling under Pi-starvation conditions using a split-root system.CP200 and CP0 indicate homogenous Pi-sufficient (200 µM) and deficient (0 µM) treatment on roots, respectively.SP200 and SP0 indicate the half of the root system on a plant supplied with Pi-sufficient (200 µM) or deficient (0 µM) treatment, respectively.Arabidopsis roots were harvested 7 days after transferring plants into the split-root systems.(B) AtMYB44 expression is systemically regulated.AtMYB44 expression was examined in WT (Col-0) and atmyb44, using a split-root system.(C) PHT1;2 and (D) PHT1;4 expression in WT (Col-0) and atmyb44 using a split-root system.Arabidopsis Actin was used as an internal control to normalize the qRT-PCR results.The data are presented as mean ± SD (three technical replicates and three technical repeats).The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in relative gene expression levels, determined by Tukey's test (p < 0.05).

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. AtMYB44 plays a role in systemic PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 regulation.(A) Schematic diagram of Arabidopsis micrografting between atmyb44 and AtMYB44 OX-1 seedlings.(B) AtMYB44 is grafttransmissible from an AtMYB44 OX-1 scion to an atmyb44 rootstock.(C) Expression of AtPHT1;2 and AtPHT1;4 is decreased in the heterografted atmyb44 rootstock.Arabidopsis Actin was used as an internal control to normalize the qRT-PCR results.KO and OX-1 indicate atmyb44 mutant and AtMYB44 OX-1 line, respectively.The data are presented as mean ± SD (three technical replicates and three technical repeats).Asterisks indicate significantly different values with homografted atmyb44 plants.(Student's t-test, p < 0.05).

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Schematic model of mobile AtMYB44-mediated PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 regulation in Arabidopsis.(A) The mobile AtMYB44 transcript is long-distantly transported from source leaves to roots via the phloem and serves as a systemic signal to negatively regulate the expression of the Pi transporters, PHT1;2 and PHT1;4, in Arabidopsis roots.In the atmyb44 mutant, AtMYB44 mRNA is absent, thereby diminishing inhibition of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 expression in roots.It results in increases of biomass and soluble Pi concentration in both shoots and roots of the atmyb44 mutant, compared to WT. (B) Under Pi-starvation conditions, PHR1 recognizes the promoter region of AtMYB44 and PHT1;2/PHT1;4 in shoots and roots, respectively, to induce those expressions.As AtMYB44 expression is abolished in the atmyb44 mutant, PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 expression is more enhanced in atmyb44 roots, compared to WT, due to absence of the negative regulatory factor, mobile AtMYB44 mRNA.Red darts and arrows indicate the increased level of designated gene expression and traits.Blue bars indicate a similar level of shoot biomass and shoot Pi concentration between WT and atmyb44 under Pi-starvation conditions.Question marks indicate the potential mechanisms that remain to be further investigated in the future.The Red X marks indicate systemic signaling mechanism, mediated by mobile AtMYB44 mRNA, are not functional in atmyb44 mutant.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Schematic model of mobile AtMYB44-mediated PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 regulation in Arabidopsis.(A) The mobile AtMYB44 transcript is long-distantly transported from source leaves to roots via the phloem and serves as a systemic signal to negatively regulate the expression of the Pi transporters, PHT1;2 and PHT1;4, in Arabidopsis roots.In the atmyb44 mutant, AtMYB44 mRNA is absent, thereby diminishing inhibition of PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 expression in roots.It results in increases of biomass and soluble Pi concentration in both shoots and roots of the atmyb44 mutant, compared to WT. (B) Under Pi-starvation conditions, PHR1 recognizes the promoter region of AtMYB44 and PHT1;2/PHT1;4 in shoots and roots, respectively, to induce those expressions.As AtMYB44 expression is abolished in the atmyb44 mutant, PHT1;2 and PHT1;4 expression is more enhanced in atmyb44 roots, compared to WT, due to absence of the negative regulatory factor, mobile AtMYB44 mRNA.Red darts and arrows indicate the increased level of designated gene expression and traits.Blue bars indicate a similar level of shoot biomass and shoot Pi concentration between WT and atmyb44 under Pi-starvation conditions.Question marks indicate the potential mechanisms that remain to be further investigated in the future.The Red X marks indicate systemic signaling mechanism, mediated by mobile AtMYB44 mRNA, are not functional in atmyb44 mutant.