Long-Distance Movement of Solanum tuberosum Translationally Controlled Tumor Protein (StTCTP) mRNA

Long-distance signaling molecules in plants, including different RNA species, play a crucial role in the development and environmental responses. Among these mobile signals, the Translationally Controlled Tumor Protein (TCTP) mRNA is one of the most abundant. TCTP regulates cell-cycle progression and programmed cell death and is involved in responses to abiotic and biotic stress as well as plant regeneration, among other functions. Considering that the ability to induce plant regeneration is linked to a possible role of TCTP in vegetative propagation and asexual reproduction, we analyzed TCTP overexpression in a solanaceous plant model that can reproduce asexually by regeneration from stolons and tubers. Therefore, in this study, the effect of transient expression of Solanum tuberosum TCTP (StTCTP) on tuber development and vegetative propagation was described. StTCTP mRNA was shown to be transported long-distance. Additionally, transient overexpression of StTCTP resulted in sprouts with a greater diameter compared to control plants. Furthermore, the early stages of tuberization were induced compared to control plants, in which only mature tubers were observed. These results suggest a role of TCTP in vegetative propagation and asexual reproduction.

Among the mobile mRNAs, mRNA encoding the Translationally Controlled Tumor Protein (TCTP or TPT1), also known as p21 and p23, is one of the most abundant and conspicuous [4,6,24,25]. TCTP is involved in a wide range of biological processes, and These results were corroborated by RT-qPCR of leaves from nine samples in which the GFP transcript was detected in apical leaves of agroinfiltrated plants with 35S::StTCTP-GFP construct and compared with 35S::GFP-GUS-harboring vector plant samples ( Figure 2). StTCTP transcript was detected in agroinfiltrated tissues, apical leaves, and roots ( Figure 2A). Additionally, the 35S::StTCTP-GFP transcript was found in the apical leaves and roots of transformed plants with this construct ( Figure 2B). In contrast, the bar mRNA was detected only in leaves of agroinfiltrated plants with either the control or the 35S::StTCTP-GFP constructs ( Figure 2C). Endogenous StTCTP mRNA was also detected in the apex, leaf, stem, root, and callus to determine the accumulation sites of this transcript ( Figure S2). There was a greater accumulation of StTCTP mRNA in the stem and root and lower in the apex, leaf, and callus. These results were corroborated by RT-qPCR of leaves from nine samples in which the GFP transcript was detected in apical leaves of agroinfiltrated plants with 35S::StTCTP-GFP construct and compared with 35S::GFP-GUS-harboring vector plant samples ( Figure 2). StTCTP transcript was detected in agroinfiltrated tissues, apical leaves, and roots ( Figure 2A). Additionally, the 35S::StTCTP-GFP transcript was found in the apical leaves and roots of transformed plants with this construct ( Figure 2B). In contrast, the bar mRNA was detected only in leaves of agroinfiltrated plants with either the control or the 35S::StTCTP-GFP constructs ( Figure 2C). Endogenous StTCTP mRNA was also detected in the apex, leaf, stem, root, and callus to determine the accumulation sites of this transcript ( Figure S2). There was a greater accumulation of StTCTP mRNA in the stem and root and lower in the apex, leaf, and callus.  Transcript levels of (A) endogenous plus TCTP derived from the 35S::StTCTP-GFP construct, (B) GFP derived solely from the 35S::StTCTP-GFP construct and (C) bar transcript derived from the selection marker gene present in the vector used for agroinfiltration with the 35S::StTCTP-GFP or 35S::GFP-GUS constructs. Data dispersion is represented with black circles and squares, respectively. n = 9 in all cases. Bars represent standard error of the mean. Asterisks symbolize significant differences according to Mann-Whitney tests: * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005, and **** p < 0.0001; not significant (ns).

Phenotype of Plants Agroinfiltrated with 35S::StTCTP-GFP or 35S::GFP-GUS
The phenotype of the agroinfiltrated plants with 35S::StTCTP-GFP or 35S::GFP-GUS were evaluated to determine whether StTCTP generated changes in the tuberization stage and leaf area. Transcript levels of (A) endogenous plus TCTP derived from the 35S::StTCTP-GFP construct, (B) GFP derived solely from the 35S::StTCTP-GFP construct and (C) bar transcript derived from the selection marker gene present in the vector used for agroinfiltration with the 35S::StTCTP-GFP or 35S::GFP-GUS constructs. Data dispersion is represented with black circles and squares, respectively. n = 9 in all cases. Bars represent standard error of the mean. Asterisks symbolize significant differences according to Mann-Whitney tests: * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005, and **** p < 0.0001; not significant (ns).

StTCTP Induced an Increase in the Number of Tubers in Early Stages of Tuberization
To determine whether 35S::StTCTP-GFP influence the phenotype of tubers, agroinfiltrated potato plants were grown and maintained until their formation. Biomass, diameter, and number of tubers per plant were measured ( Figure S3). No statistically significant differences between plants agroinfiltrated with 35S::StTCTP-GFP and control plants regard- ing tubers per plant, tuber diameter, or biomass were found. However, StTCTP appeared to increase tuber induction since we found eight plants treated with 35S::StTCTP-GFP harbored tubers in immature stages of tuberization (79 immature tubers in total, stages I-VII [56]) compared to control plants, in which only mature tubers (stage VIII) were observed ( Figure 3; Table S1).

StTCTP Induced an Increase in the Number of Tubers in Early Stages of Tuberization
To determine whether 35S::StTCTP-GFP influence the phenotype of tubers, agroinfiltrated potato plants were grown and maintained until their formation. Biomass, diameter, and number of tubers per plant were measured ( Figure S3). No statistically significant differences between plants agroinfiltrated with 35S::StTCTP-GFP and control plants regarding tubers per plant, tuber diameter, or biomass were found. However, StTCTP appeared to increase tuber induction since we found eight plants treated with 35S::StTCTP-GFP harbored tubers in immature stages of tuberization (79 immature tubers in total, stages I-VII [56]) compared to control plants, in which only mature tubers (stage VIII) were observed ( Figure 3; Table S1).  In addition, the formation of plantlets and a stolon in three out of thirty plants was observed after agroinfiltration with 35S::StTCTP-GFP (in which the GFP amplicon was In addition, the formation of plantlets and a stolon in three out of thirty plants was observed after agroinfiltration with 35S::StTCTP-GFP (in which the GFP amplicon was detected). In contrast, no plantlets or stolons were observed in plants agroinfiltrated with 35S::GFP-GUS (0/30; Figure 4).

StTCTP Promoted an Increase in Sprout Diameter
In order to analyze the phenotype of mature tubers of plants agroinfiltrated with 35S::StTCTP-GFP, a sprout generation assay was carried out. First, all the sprouts of the 35S::StTCTP-GFP plants showed purple pigmentation indicating strong anthocyanin accumulation, while those from plants agroinfiltrated with the control vector did not show any pigmentation ( Figure 5A

StTCTP Promoted an Increase in Sprout Diameter
In order to analyze the phenotype of mature tubers of plants agroinfiltrated with 35S::StTCTP-GFP, a sprout generation assay was carried out. First, all the sprouts of the 35S::StTCTP-GFP plants showed purple pigmentation indicating strong anthocyanin accumulation, while those from plants agroinfiltrated with the control vector did not show any pigmentation ( Figure 5A,B). Second, although sprout number per tuber and their length did not show a statistically significant difference, the sprout diameter was larger in the emerging tubers of 35S::StTCTP-GFP-treated plants compared to those agroinfiltrated with 35S::GFP-GUS ( Figure 5C-E).

Molecular Docking Simulation Indicated Interaction between StTCTP and PTB1/6
Transport of phloem-mobile mRNAs such as StBEL5 and POTH1 is mediated by the polypyrimidine tract-binding proteins (PTB) 1 and 6, forming a complex with their 3′untranslated regions [53,[57][58][59]. Thus, it was of interest to determine if these proteins could also interact in silico with StTCTP mRNA. First, the StTCTP, AtTCTP1, AtTCTP2, CmTCTP, and StBEL5 transcript 3D structures were predicted, then docking of these RNAs with PTB1 and PTB6 proteins was carried out in silico. The models with the best scores and criteria were chosen for further analysis (Tables S2 and S3). On the other hand, for 3D structure prediction of StPTB1 and StPTB6, the models with the best scores and validation values were also selected (Tables S4 and S5). Finally, for the protein-RNA docking, the interaction models with the highest confidence scores were analyzed (Table S8). The results suggest that StTCTP mRNA may, in fact, interact with these proteins, implying that it could be transported to roots, where it might potentially participate in the regulation of tuber formation and vegetative propagation. Hypothetical interactions of AtTCTP1, AtTCTP2, CmTCTP, and StBEL5 (control) with PTB1 and PTB6 were also predicted ( Figure  S4.

Molecular Docking Simulation Indicated Interaction between StTCTP and PTB1/6
Transport of phloem-mobile mRNAs such as StBEL5 and POTH1 is mediated by the polypyrimidine tract-binding proteins (PTB) 1 and 6, forming a complex with their 3 -untranslated regions [53,[57][58][59]. Thus, it was of interest to determine if these proteins could also interact in silico with StTCTP mRNA. First, the StTCTP, AtTCTP1, AtTCTP2, CmTCTP, and StBEL5 transcript 3D structures were predicted, then docking of these RNAs with PTB1 and PTB6 proteins was carried out in silico. The models with the best scores and criteria were chosen for further analysis (Tables S2 and S3). On the other hand, for 3D structure prediction of StPTB1 and StPTB6, the models with the best scores and validation values were also selected (Tables S4 and S5). Finally, for the protein-RNA docking, the interaction models with the highest confidence scores were analyzed (Table S8). The results suggest that StTCTP mRNA may, in fact, interact with these proteins, implying that it could be transported to roots, where it might potentially participate in the regulation of tuber formation and vegetative propagation. Hypothetical interactions of AtTCTP1, AtTCTP2, CmTCTP, and StBEL5 (control) with PTB1 and PTB6 were also predicted ( Figure S4).

Discussion
The long-distance transport of proteins and RNAs (e.g., miRNAs, mRNAs, siRNAs, and lncRNAs) appears to regulate processes that require communication between distant plant tissues. Examples of these processes include flower and tuber induction, which are mediated by homologs of the FT protein; tuber induction by miRNA172, miRNA156, and StBEL5 mRNA; response to phosphate deficiency by miRNA399 and other mRNAs, as well as silencing by siRNAs; among many others [14,17,19,20]. It has been determined that TCTP protein and mRNA are transported long-distance and have been found in phloem proteomes and transcriptomes across different species. TCTP has the potential to induce regeneration and adventitious roots across graft junctions. However, it remains unclear whether TCTP function is linked to its mobility to distant tissues. CmTCTP and AtTCTP2 have been shown to induce plant regeneration, suggesting their potential association with asexual reproduction in plants [56]. Considering the structural similarity between these proteins, it can be hypothesized that these share a common function [48].
Transient transformation assays indicate that the StTCTP mRNA functions in a non-cell autonomous manner. Indeed, our results demonstrate the bidirectional transport of StTCTP mRNA from agroinfiltrated leaves to apical leaves as well as roots. In our analysis, the ORF was used, as prior studies have established that TCTP mRNA transport does not require 5or 3 -UTR. In addition, it has been demonstrated that AtTCTP1 ORF (spanning from the start codon to position 285) is able to mediate transcript mobility [43,47]. GFP mRNA levels in apical leaves of plants agroinfiltrated with 35S::StTCTP-GFP were higher than in the 35S::GFP-GUS-treated plants, indicating the presence of the recombinant transcript in the apical leaves of these plants (which was also observed by endpoint RT-PCR). It is important to indicate that the StTCTP-GFP fusion mRNA is around 1.2 kb, plus approximately 300 bp of the poly A tail, while the GUS-GFP fusion is around 2.5 kb (excluding the poly (A) tail), which could make the transport of this mRNA more difficult, although several studies have failed to detect entry of the GUS-GFP transcript into the phloem translocation stream [13,43]. This finding supports the notion that StTCTP mRNA is transported over long distances, as CmTCTP and AtTCTP2 are.
Agroinfiltrated plants were maintained in the greenhouse until mature tuber emergence to determine the potential effects of StTCTP overexpression on their phenotype. In our study, no statistically significant differences were observed in tuber number per plant, biomass, or diameter. However, we observed an evident larger number of mature and immature tubers in the 35S::StTCTP-GFP-treated plants (179 in total) compared to the control group (88 in total), supporting the notion that this gene is involved in the tuberization process. Importantly, StTCTP-treated plants harbored tubers at different stages of immature development, in contrast, to control plants, in which these were not observed. It must be emphasized that the number of mature tubers was similar (100 total mature tubers in StTCTP-GFP treated plants versus 88 in control plants), but no immature tubers were observed in the control plants. A similar trend towards an increase in aerial biomass of plants that were agroinfiltrated with 35S::StTCTP-GFP was also observed, which is consistent with the observation that tomato TCTP overexpression in tobacco causes an increase in biomass [35]. The induction of tubers in early stages of development after agroinfiltration with the vector harboring 35S::StTCTP-GFP suggested that StTCTP could play a role in tuber formation, although a scenario in which tuber development is inhibited by StTCTP is also possible, judging from the presence of immature tubers in the treated plants. Furthermore, we found leaf-to-root transport of StTCTP mRNA, presumably through the phloem, which is supported indirectly by the presence of TCTP mRNA and protein in phloem exudates and its expression in phloem in other species. Similarly, StBEL5 mRNA is phloem mobile, enhancing tuberization by targeting genes that control growth [53]. It is becoming increasingly clear that there are multiple phloem-mobile signals that control tuberization, either its induction or development, although their hierarchy is less clear since it appears that there are several independent pathways regulating tuber development. Thus, StTCTP may be involved more directly in tuber development. It will be of interest to determine the pathway through which it acts in this process. It should be added that the StTCTP mRNA is likely translated in the roots, and the observed effects are caused by the protein rather than the mRNA.
35S::StTCTP-GFP mRNA levels are 1 to 2 orders of magnitude lower than the endogenous StTCTP mRNA (as determined by GFP mRNA accumulation) (Figure 2). While this is expected given the transient nature of the transformation method, it is interesting to note that even this modest increase of transcript was able to induce a phenotype in roots, i.e., induction of the immature development stages (I-VII) of tuberization. It is of great interest to analyze if both expression and long-distance transport of StTCTP protein and mRNA are tightly regulated. Another effect of StTCTP overexpression was the accumulation of anthocyanins, antioxidant compounds that promote tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress [60], possibly related to the TCTP function of tolerance to different types of stress in plants. Thus, it can be proposed that overexpression of StTCTP could lead to an abnormal phenotype due to the unregulated transport of mRNA. An important effect observed was the formation of plantlets and stolons, a common mechanism for asexual plant reproduction, which may bear relation to the ability of CmTCTP, AtTCTP2, and, possibly, StTCTP to induce whole plant regeneration. It must be mentioned that plant regeneration mediated by the former two requires A. rhizogenes and, more precisely, its rol genes. It will be of interest to determine if this phenomenon occurs independently of A. rhizogenes in a species that is able to reproduce asexually from stolons, such as potato.
The main abiotic factors that influence the tuberization process include short-day conditions and cold temperatures [61]. Interestingly, the Arabidopsis AtTCTP1 gene is induced by cold conditions, while in Pharbitis nil, the transcript encoding a TCTP homolog was isolated from cotyledons under short-day conditions [62,63]. These findings highlight the potential of TCTP in regulating tuberization in response to environmental cues.
Although StTCTP is most actively expressed in stems and roots and at lower levels in leaves, it is not clear why it is transported to distant tissues. It could be interpreted that some extra input of the gene product from source tissues is required in apices. However, it is of great interest to determine source tissues for long-distance transport of StTCTP in wild-type plants.
Given that StBEL5 mRNA interacts with StPTB1/6, which are members of the PTB family of RNA-binding proteins that regulate specific stages of development through interaction with phloem-mobile transcripts [58,59], the potential interaction of the StTCTP transcript with these proteins was analyzed through molecular docking. The results indicated that this transcript could bind to PTB1/6 according to in silico predictions, suggesting that StTCTP may also be transported and its activity regulated by the StPTB protein family. Furthermore, our results indicated that the phloem-mobile transcripts AtTCTP1, AtTCTP2, CmTCTP, and StBEL5 are also predicted to bind PTB1/6.
The results described herein indicate that the StTCTP mRNA is transported from agroinfiltrated leaves to apical leaves and roots, where it elicits changes in tuber development, as well as generation of plantlets from roots, thus suggesting a role in vegetative propagation and, by extension, in asexual reproduction.

Plant Material
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Cambray) tubers were disinfected with 1% Tween-20 and distilled sterile water, incubated in the dark until sprouts emerged (about 2 weeks), and planted in sterile soil (soil:peat moss:agrolite; 2:2:1) in pots 40 cm long and sheltered in greenhouse. The soil was stirred twice a week to allow aeration of emerging roots and tubers.
Callus induction was performed as described previously [64] for determination of endogenous StTCTP mRNA levels. Stem explants previously disinfected with 0.5% bleach and abundantly washed with water were placed in MS medium (1.0 MS salts, 2% sucrose, and 0.4% Gelrite Gelrite agar) supplemented with 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D and 2.0 mg/L BA and incubated in dark conditions until callus formation (10 days). All reagents used were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise stated.

RNA Extraction and Vector Construction
RNA was extracted from 1 g of ground tissues (leaf, root, and callus) using the guanidine hydrochloride method [65]. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using Superscript III (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer's recommendations, and the StTCTP ORF was amplified using Takara ExTaq (Takara Bio USA, San Jose, CA, USA) with StTCTP-specific primers (without stop codon; Table S7) the conditions of the endpoint PCR were as follows: 30 cycles of denaturation (98 • C, 10 s), primer annealing (60 • C, 30 s), and primer extension (72 • C, 1 min). The amplification product was cloned into the pCR8/GW/TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher), and its orientation was confirmed by PCR, digestion, and sequencing. The entry clone was recombined into the pB7FWG2.0 binary vector through Gateway cloning to obtain the StTCTP ORF fused to the GFP ORF (35S::StTCTP-GFP) under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter. Similarly, the e35S promoter from pBUN4U6SM vector [66] was amplified by PCR which was introduced into the pBGWFS7 binary vector also by Gateway cloning for use as a control (35S::GFP-GUS vector). Both the 35S::StTCTP-GFP and 35S::GFP-GUS constructs were used to transform A. rhizogenes (strain K599) by electroporation, as previously described [53]. Candidate clones were verified by PCR.

Potato Transient Transformation
Transient transformation was carried out by agroinfiltration of 3-week-old potato after sprout emerged. Three leaves distal to apical and root meristems were chosen to perform the agroinfiltration procedure [67]. Briefly, A. rhizogenes K599 carrying the 35S::StTCTP-GFP vector was cultured in YEB medium (1 g/L yeast extract, 5 g/L peptone, 5 g/L sucrose, 0.5 g/L MgCl 2 ) supplemented with antibiotics (spectinomycin 100 mg/L) and incubated for 48 h at 28 • C at 150 rpm. Subsequently, the bacterial culture was pelleted by centrifugation at 3000× g for 15 min at 4 • C. The resulting pellet was resuspended in infiltration medium (10 mM MgCl 2 ·7H 2 O, 10 mM 2-[N-morpholino] ethanesulfonic acid (MES) pH 5.6 and 200 µM acetosyringone) until reaching an OD600 equal to 0.8. A. rhizogenes suspension was injected into the abaxial surface of the leaf. One week post-infiltration, tissues were collected for detection by endpoint RT-PCR and RT-qPCR.

Endpoint RT-PCR
Plant tissues (agroinfiltrated leaves, apical leaves, and roots) were collected for RNA extraction as previously described. cDNA synthesis was carried out with WarmStart ® RTx Reverse Transcriptase (New England Biolabs; Beverly, MA, USA), according to the supplier's recommendations. Briefly, the kit components (final concentrations: Isothermal Amplification Buffer (1X), dNTP Mix (0.5 mM), Random Primer Mix (6 µM), RNase Inhibitor-Murine (20 units), WarmStart RTx Reverse Transcriptase (0.25 µL) were homogenized with target cDNA at a concentration of 100 ng/µL. Mix was incubated for 5 min at 25 • C for annealing, 10 min at 55 • C for synthesis, and 10 min at 80 • C for enzyme inactivation. cDNA was used for endpoint PCR to detect the GFP and GAPDH transcripts (Table S7) using Platinum ® Taq DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher) following the manufacturer's recommendations.

Quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR)
GFP, StTCTP, bar, and GAPDH transcript levels were determined by RT-qPCR. Then, 50 ng/µL of RNA was mixed with the KAPA SYBR ® FAST qPCR Master Mix reagents following the user manual specifications (Merck; Rahway, NJ, USA). Specific primers for GFP, StTCTP, bar [68], and GAPDH (Table S7) were used to set up the RT-qPCR reaction. The mix was incubated in Step One Plus Real-Time PCR System under the following conditions: the holding stage consisted of 5 min at 42 • C for reverse transcription; the next step was 5 min at 95 • C; the cycling stage comprised 95 • C per 5 s and 60 • C per 20 s with 40 cycles; the melt curve stage consisted of 15 s at 95 • C and 1 min at 60 • C; finally, 15 s al 95 • C to assure no additional products amplified in the reaction. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. GAPDH was used to normalize transcript accumulation. The 2 −∆∆Ct method was used to calculate relative transcript accumulation [69].

Shoot Induction Assay
Tubers of plants agroinfiltrated with the 35S::StTCTP-GFP and 35S::GFP-GUS constructs were incubated at 4 • C in dark for two months. Subsequently, number of shoots per tuber, length and diameter of the emerging shoot, as well as size and weight of the tubers, tubers per plant were determined with the IC Measure program (https://www. theimagingsource.com/, accessed on 12 October 2022).  (Table S8). Each sequence was uploaded to RNAFold web server (http://rna.tbi.univie. ac.at/cgi-bin/RNAWebSuite/RNAfold.cgi, accessed on 9 February 2023) selecting the minimum free energy (MFE) and partition function algorithm to obtain the secondary structure with its Vienna format [70]. The 3D structure of the mRNAs was generated in the 3dRNA web Server (http://biophy.hust.edu.cn/3dRNA, accessed on 16 February 2023) by entering the transcript sequence and the Vienna format, choosing the option to generate 5 optimized predictions [71,72], which were analyzed in MolProbity (http://molprobity.biochem.duke.edu/, accessed on 22 February 2023) with the Nucleic Acid criteria, Geometry, Chiral handedness swaps, and Tetrahedral geometry outliers to perform the comparisons [73]. In addition, EMDataResource Pseudotorsion Plot Beta Server (https://ptp.emdataresource.org/index.html, accessed on 25 February 2023) was used to evaluate the best models based on virtual torsion angles generating pseudotorsion plots for RNA that are analogous to Ramachandran plots for proteins [74]. The model with the best scores and criteria was chosen for further analysis.

Prediction of 3D Structures of Proteins
Prediction of the hypothesized 3D structure of StPTB1 and StPTB6 [58,59] was performed in the AlphaFold Colab Notebook program (AlphaFold.ipynb), which is an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm that starts from the primary sequence of a protein to predict the 3D protein structure by incorporating neural network architectures and training procedures based on the evolutionary, physical, and geometric constraints of protein structures [75,76]. The obtained model was evaluated and refined in the DeepRefiner web server (http://watson.cse.eng.auburn.edu/DeepRefiner/index.php, accessed on 3 February 2023), which uses deep learning to generate new models [77], which were analyzed using MolProbity scores for proteins and Saves v60 (https://saves.mbi.ucla.edu/, accessed on 3 March 2023), which is a server for programs commonly used in protein structure validation [78][79][80] selecting the models with the best scores (ERRAT, Verify 3D, PROCHECK and Ramachandran).

Protein-RNA Interactions by Molecular Docking Simulation
Protein-RNA docking was performed in HDOCK (http://hdock.phys.hust.edu.cn/, accessed on 15 March 2023), based on a hybrid algorithm of template-based modeling and ab initio free docking [81,82]. PDB corresponding to the proteins PTB1 and PTB6 were introduced with the ligand in PDB of the StTCTP, CmTCTP, AtTCTP1, AtTCTP2, and BEL5 mRNAs independently. The model with the highest confidence score was analyzed and visualized in UCSF Chimera and 1.16 and UCSF ChimeraX 1.5 [83,84].

Statistical Analysis
Phenotype quantification was analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.0 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA (https://www.graphpad.com/, accessed on 27 February 2023) with the Mann-Whitney U test with a two-tailed p-value (p > 0.05).

Conclusions
TCTP has diverse functions related to cell proliferation, regulation of programmed cell death, response to pathogens, and regeneration in plants. In addition, some members of this family function in a non-cell autonomous manner, protein, mRNA, or both. In the present study, through the transient transformation of potato, we found evidence that the StTCTP-GFP transcript is transported long-distance from agroinfiltrated leaves to the apical leaves and roots. Furthermore, it may have a role in tuber development and in regeneration, which in turn, suggests a role in asexual reproduction in this plant species. Additional work is required to determine the pathway through which StTCTP may regulate these processes.

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.