Elemental Composition of Above and Belowground Mangrove Tissue and Sediment in Managed and Unmanaged Compartments of the Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve

Mangrove productivity depends on the storage of nutrients and elements. Elemental concentrations were examined in leaves, roots, and sediments for three age stands (15, 25 years, and VJR) of Rhizophora apiculata in the Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve (MMFR). Six compartments with two compartments each for each age group were used to analyze sixteen elements. Four types of elemental patterns were examined with decreasing order during analysis: (1) Cd < Cu < Pb < Zn < Mg < Mn < Fe < K < Na < Ca and P% < S% < N% < C% in leaves, (2) Cd < Pb < Cu < Zn < Mg < Mn < Fe < K < Na < Ca and P% < S% < N% < C% in roots, (3) Cd < Pb < Cu < Zn < Mg < Mn < K < Fe < Na < Ca and P% < N% < S% < C% in sediment samples and (4) Cd(S) < Pb(S) < Cu(S) < Zn(S) < Mg(S) < Mn(L) < K(L) < Fe(S) < Na(R) < Ca(R) and P%(S) < S%(S) < N%(L) < C%(R) collectively for all samples. Evidence that elements do not store primarily in above-ground biomass can be found in the observation that elements are stored more in sediment and roots. The outcome of the present study shows that the rate of increase of elements in trees (leaves and roots) was less as compared to sediments, where the elemental concentration increased considerably with time. Elemental concentration comparison within three age classes showed that C, N, and S were significantly different in all three types of samples. The δ15N ratios showed positive values in all six compartments which supported the concept that the δ15N ratio could not be observed in N concentration in this study. The δ13C values showed more negative values in all six compartments which represented less salinity and a freshwater intake. The S, P, and heavy metals concentrations were high. The concentrations of Cd, P, N, C, and S in the sediment influenced variations in four compartments in accordance with the three mangrove age groups. The results of this study can be utilized to create management plans for MMFR and conduct risk assessments of the elements’ concentration in sediment.


Introduction
Mangrove ecosystems are highly productive in terms of storing and fixing high amounts of carbon [1][2][3]. Although mangroves are rich in carbon, there is a contradiction found in studies that some mangroves are poor in nutrient accumulation. Often mangrove soil is deficient in nutrients [4] but nutrient availability varies within and between mangrove forests [5]. According to Ukpong, nutrients exhibited a major component that could affect vegetation performance in Africa [6]. In Florida, the mangrove stand of Rhizophora mangle, which had more nutrients and freshwater input, was highly productive relative to mangrove species in other areas [7]. Furthermore, nutrient limitation is a key factor in causing productivity decline [8,9].  In root samples of R. apiculata, mean values of elements ranged from 4.47‰ to 9.86‰ for δ15N, −28.40‰ to −20.64‰ for δ13C, 0.007 to 0.009 for Cd, 0.0602 to 0.115 for Cu, 4.91 to 7.69 for Fe, 23.92 to 28.07 for K, 1.76 to 1.83 for Mg, 0.582 to 2.069 for Mn, 0.067 to 0.087 for Pb, 0.412 to 0.526 for Zn, 5105.06 to 5798.6 for Na, 10765.68 to 11329.4 for Ca, 37.03% to 40.89% for C, 0.392% to 0.551% for N, 0.200% to 0.268% for P and 0.211% to 0.535% S. Decreasing order of Cd < Pb < Cu < Zn < Mg < Mn < Fe < K < Na < Ca and P% < S% < N% < C% were recorded in root samples. δ15N, δ13C, Ca, Na, C, and S showed significant results in all 16 variables and were placed in separate groups as shown in Table 2.
In sediment samples from all six compartments, elemental concentration mean values ranged from 2.66‰ to 6 10.84% for C,0.319% to 0.477% for N, 0.201% to 0.380% for P and 0.542% to 1.70% for S. A decreasing order of Cd < Pb < Cu < Zn < Mg < Mn < K < Fe < Na < Ca and P% < N% < S% < C% was observed. A comparison of sediment nutrients within all six compartments showed that δ15N, δ13C, Na, P, Cu, K, Mn, Zn, C, N, and S were significantly different (Table 3). A collectively decreasing order of Cd (S) < Pb (S) < Cu (S) < Zn (S) < Mg (S) < Mn (L) < K (L) < Fe (S) < Na (R) < Ca (R) and P% (S) < S% (S) < N% (L) < C% (R) in leaves, root, and sediment samples for all six compartments was observed and the highest concentration of δ15N and δ13C was observed in root samples.

Multivariate Analysis
The multivariate principal component analysis (PCA) biplot for mangrove leaves revealed the influence of all the elements except Cu, C, and S on the variation of compartments ( Figure 1A,B). According to this relationship, δ13C, δ15N C, Fe, K, Zn, Mg, and Na influences the differences between compartment 18 and 31 for Rhizophora apiculata species aged 15 from other compartments and ages ( Figure 1A). However, Cu and P influence variation in all the compartments except 31 and 18 based on mangrove ages 25 and VJR. Relationships based on the compartment revealed compartment 18 to be more influenced by C, compartment 31 by Fe, K, Zn and Mg, Cu and P, while Pb, N, Cd, Ca, S and Mn by compartments 42, 55, 71 and 74. This relationship revealed by the PCA was based on component 1 (19.20%) and component 2 (13.60%) accounting for a total variation of 32.80% ( Figure 1A). influences the differences between compartment 18 and 31 for Rhizophora apiculata species aged 15 from other compartments and ages ( Figure 1A). However, Cu and P influence variation in all the compartments except 31 and 18 based on mangrove ages 25 and VJR. Relationships based on the compartment revealed compartment 18 to be more influenced by C, compartment 31 by Fe, K, Zn and Mg, Cu and P, while Pb, N, Cd, Ca, S and Mn by compartments 42, 55, 71 and 74. This relationship revealed by the PCA was based on component 1 (19.20%) and component 2 (13.60%) accounting for a total variation of 32.80% ( Figure 1A). The PCA biplot for mangrove roots revealed the influence of all the elements on the variation of compartments (Figure 2A, B). In line with this relationship δ13C, δ15N and all the elements influence the variations in all the compartments for Rhizophora apiculata species aged 15, 25, and VJR ( Figure 2A). However, δ13C, δ15N, C, Ca, and Cu were negatively correlated with other elements (Figure 2A, B). This relationship revealed by the PCA was based on component 1 (14.10%) and component 2 (11.60%) accounting for a total variation of 25.70% (Figure 2A). The PCA biplot for mangrove roots revealed the influence of all the elements on the variation of compartments (Figure 2A,B). In line with this relationship δ13C, δ15N and all the elements influence the variations in all the compartments for Rhizophora apiculata species aged 15, 25, and VJR ( Figure 2A). However, δ13C, δ15N, C, Ca, and Cu were negatively correlated with other elements (Figure 2A,B). This relationship revealed by the PCA was based on component 1 (14.10%) and component 2 (11.60%) accounting for a total variation of 25.70% (Figure 2A).

Elemental Pattern and Mangrove Age
To observe the elemental pattern with increasing age, three age classes of 15 years, 25 years, and VJR were established in the box plot. This was completed by taking the sample mean values of compartments 18 and 31 for the 15-year age class, 71 and 74 for the 25-year age class, and 42 and 55 for the VJR. This analysis presented a significant difference among certain elements in different age groups in all three categories: leaves, roots, and sediments. In leaf samples, Mn, Na, C, N, and S showed significant differences in the 15year, 25-year, and VJR classes ( Figure 4). Moreover, in root samples, Mn, C, N, and S showed significant differences within the three age classes ( Figure 5). Lastly in the sediment samples, Cu, K, C, N, and S showed significant differences in the three age classes ( Figure 6). Interestingly, in all three types of samples C, N, and S showed substantial differences which shows that concentrations of these elements change with time continuously. This analysis is also in contrast to the analysis of the results presented earlier where averages of each class were taken rather than the means of the same age group. The earlier analysis showed no difference among different age classes.

Elemental Pattern and Mangrove Age
To observe the elemental pattern with increasing age, three age classes of 15 years, 25 years, and VJR were established in the box plot. This was completed by taking the sample mean values of compartments 18 and 31 for the 15-year age class, 71 and 74 for the 25-year age class, and 42 and 55 for the VJR. This analysis presented a significant difference among certain elements in different age groups in all three categories: leaves, roots, and sediments. In leaf samples, Mn, Na, C, N, and S showed significant differences in the 15-year, 25-year, and VJR classes ( Figure 4). Moreover, in root samples, Mn, C, N, and S showed significant differences within the three age classes ( Figure 5). Lastly in the sediment samples, Cu, K, C, N, and S showed significant differences in the three age classes ( Figure 6). Interestingly, in all three types of samples C, N, and S showed substantial differences which shows that concentrations of these elements change with time continuously. This analysis is also in contrast to the analysis of the results presented earlier where averages of each class were taken rather than the means of the same age group. The earlier analysis showed no difference among different age classes.

Discussion
The storage of nutrients and elements in different concentrations determines the productivity of the mangrove's ecosystem. Usually, mangroves are poor in stocking nutrients in the soil [4]. However, this paper finds that the sediments store more elements compared to the root and leaves (living biomass). Furthermore, this paper states that certain elemental compositions of the samples from leaves, roots, and sediments vary considerably in all three age groups. A similar idea is suggested in [12] which states that forest age is one of the many factors that determine the elemental storage in a forest ecosystem. This was also supported by the influence of sediments Cd, P, N, C, and S concentrations on variations in compartments 18, 42, 71, and 74, in accordance with the three mangrove age groups revealed by the PCA with a total variation of 34.80%. The current study also observed that the concentration of most elements in leaves and roots increased with age. The pool size of all the elements in sediment increased with age except C, N, Mn, and Pb. In the leaves and roots section, Cu. Cu, Cd, Pb, Mn, Zn, C, P, and S concentrations increased in the living biomass of trees with age. Nevertheless, some data patterns in other forest ecosystems revealed declining elemental concentrations with age [13]. The relation between age and elemental concentration is highly complex because of the interactions of climate, nutrient use, leaching, and soil fertility [29]. Alongi et al. [12] also argue that agewise, R. apiculata in Southeast Asia shows a growth trend to 20 years of age thereafter,

Discussion
The storage of nutrients and elements in different concentrations determines the productivity of the mangrove's ecosystem. Usually, mangroves are poor in stocking nutrients in the soil [4]. However, this paper finds that the sediments store more elements compared to the root and leaves (living biomass). Furthermore, this paper states that certain elemental compositions of the samples from leaves, roots, and sediments vary considerably in all three age groups. A similar idea is suggested in [12] which states that forest age is one of the many factors that determine the elemental storage in a forest ecosystem. This was also supported by the influence of sediments Cd, P, N, C, and S concentrations on variations in compartments 18, 42, 71, and 74, in accordance with the three mangrove age groups revealed by the PCA with a total variation of 34.80%. The current study also observed that the concentration of most elements in leaves and roots increased with age. The pool size of all the elements in sediment increased with age except C, N, Mn, and Pb. In the leaves and roots section, Cu. Cu, Cd, Pb, Mn, Zn, C, P, and S concentrations increased in the living biomass of trees with age. Nevertheless, some data patterns in other forest ecosystems revealed declining elemental concentrations with age [13]. The relation between age and elemental concentration is highly complex because of the interactions of climate, nutrient use, leaching, and soil fertility [29]. Alongi et al. [12] also argue that age-wise, R. apiculata in Southeast Asia shows a growth trend to 20 years of age thereafter, presenting an inconsistent trend up to the age of 65 [12]. This could also form the reason for δ13C, δ15N C, Fe, K, Zn, Mg, and Na influencing the differences between compartments 18 and 31 for Rhizophora apiculata species aged 15 from other compartments and ages.
Results from other studies presented a decline in nitrogen (N) percentage in the soil in three age stands of 3, 5, and 25 years. However, this nitrogen (N) increased or accumulated in the mangrove tree [11,13,14]. In the present study, most of the elements were accumulated in roots and sediment. The accumulation of elements in soil or subsurface soil was due to the slow decomposition of roots. Below-ground mud soil acts as a storage unit for elements [24]. For terrestrial forests, the storage of nutrients or elements is mainly concentrated on floor litter [25]. On the other hand, for mangroves, subsurface soil is the main storage compartment because tidal movement and crab foraging inhibit the storage of nutrients on surface soil [26]. Resultantly dead roots act as storage units for nutrients and can serve as prime sites for carbon sequestration. Soil element availability and storage are dependent on geochemical processes occurring in mangrove soil. Some other elements found in higher concentrations in the sediments were S and Fe. Roots prevent the transport of toxic materials such as sulfides by accumulating them [27]. Similar to the study in Swai Bay forests in Thailand, our results showed that the pattern of elements stored in sediment was high. Similar observations were made in Avicennia marina and Rhizophora stylosa mangrove forests, where 95% of all the elements were stored in soil [12,13].
The high content of nitrogen (N) in leaves sampled from compartment 31 indicates the influence of anthropogenic activities such as agricultural activities in the catchment of the compartment [30]. Other causes could include increased N cycling associated directly with anthropogenic impacts [31]. Agricultural waste is a product of anthropogenic activities and could contribute to an increase in N values. [32]. A possible influence of anthropogenic activities in mangrove ecosystems such as agricultural waste has been reported in the Matang mangrove ecosystem in Malaysia [1], New Zealand [33], and other impacted sites located in the central Red Sea [31]. In addition, other studies have also reported a high concentration of N in mangrove leaves compared to other mangrove tissues and sediment [34,35]. A possible presence of younger leaves in samples from compartment 31 could also form a part of the reason for the high N concentration recorded [34].
As for the trend-wise comparison, a study was conducted in 20-year-old aged compartments of MMFR [10]. Roots, stem disks, barks, twigs, and leaf samples were analyzed to find out the concentration of elements. The decreasing trend of Ca > Na > K > Mg > Mn > Al > Fe > Zn > Cu > Pb > Cd were stated. The present research showed a similar trend where Ca > Na > C > K > N > Fe > Mn > Mg > Zn > S > P > Pb > Cu > Cd was observed in leaves and root samples. Regarding the presence of elements, the moderate concentration of Mg, K, Ca, Na and C in leaves were found in studies that analyzed mangroves and tropical trees [13,36,37]. These studies also reported high concentrations of Cu, Cd, Pb, Mn, and Zn which can be interpreted as heavy metal pollution due to human activities [38]. Additionally, Rhizophora species gather Ca in leaves but keep K and Na at mid-level [16,17]. Furthermore, according to our research, the N and P percentage was different as compared to other mangrove studies [14,39]. This study does not support the findings of past studies that mangrove forest accumulates additional nutrients in living biomass compared to soil.
Within same-age compartments, elemental concentration was more varied between 18 and 31 (15 years) compared to variation between 71 and 74 (25 years). This could be due to widespread pollution in Kuala Sepetang where 15-year-old compartments are located [40]. This deviation might be caused by a change in situ, anthropogenic effects. Virgin Jungle Reserve compartments (VJR), which were of unknown age, exhibited similar behavior except for sulfur concentration. VJR 42 is in Kuala Sepetang, where high concentrations of sulfur might be due to pollution. Mg, K, Ca, Na, and P concentrations in living biomass and sediment were almost the same in all the compartments. Analysis of P concentration showed that the area was not deficient in P. Heavy metal concentrations in sediment were high which could be attributed to nearby industries dumping their waste.
The changing pattern of elements in sediment samples can be due to geochemical processes but in living biomass it might be that roots store elements in large proportion with passing time and leaves use elements according to their requirements [41].

Leaves
The δ13C values ranged from −27.90 to −30.67‰ in all six compartments. Scientists mostly rely on the leaf chemistry of trees for δ13C measurements since it gives more information about forest dynamics. A value of δ13C indicates water use efficiency, salinity, and in some cases eutrophication [7]. These values showed less salinity stress for all six compartments. They also showed freshwater inputs for these mangrove compartments. A Santa Catarina, Brazil Tognella et al. [42] study showed values of −12.7 to −26.4‰, representing salinity stress in that area.
Values of δ15N from 3.57 to 8.67‰ in leaves were positive, showing that N was not restricting plant development and that plants were acquiring their N from soil layers where denitrification represents a relative gathering of 15N [43]. Fry and Cormier, [7] explained δ15N values with watershed inputs. These values in leaves explain the anthropogenic effect of water irrigation in the form of Nitrogen pollution. In short, mangrove coastal ecosystems can be assessed for environmental stresses, sewage, and eutrophication by monitoring leaf nutrient status.
Stable isotope differences for the three age classes were also compared. In leaf samples, it was observed that there was no significant difference between different age classes (Figure 7), which reflects that studied species respond well under salinity and environmental stresses [44]. concentration showed that the area was not deficient in P. Heavy metal concentrations in sediment were high which could be attributed to nearby industries dumping their waste. The changing pattern of elements in sediment samples can be due to geochemical processes but in living biomass it might be that roots store elements in large proportion with passing time and leaves use elements according to their requirements [41].

Leaves
The δ13C values ranged from −27.90 to −30.67‰ in all six compartments. Scientists mostly rely on the leaf chemistry of trees for δ13C measurements since it gives more information about forest dynamics. A value of δ13C indicates water use efficiency, salinity, and in some cases eutrophication [7]. These values showed less salinity stress for all six compartments. They also showed freshwater inputs for these mangrove compartments. A Santa Catarina, Brazil Tognella et al. [42] study showed values of −12.7 to −26.4‰, representing salinity stress in that area.
Values of δ15N from 3.57 to 8.67‰ in leaves were positive, showing that N was not restricting plant development and that plants were acquiring their N from soil layers where denitrification represents a relative gathering of 15N [43]. Fry and Cormier, [7] explained δ15N values with watershed inputs. These values in leaves explain the anthropogenic effect of water irrigation in the form of Nitrogen pollution. In short, mangrove coastal ecosystems can be assessed for environmental stresses, sewage, and eutrophication by monitoring leaf nutrient status.
Stable isotope differences for the three age classes were also compared. In leaf samples, it was observed that there was no significant difference between different age classes (Figure 7), which reflects that studied species respond well under salinity and environmental stresses [44].

Roots
Mangrove roots are actively involved in nutrient and water absorption. This prop root system helps mangroves to survive in difficult environmental conditions [45]. Furthermore, a horizontal network of roots covers a large area, enabling it to acquire more nutrients from the soil. Approximately more than 50% of biomass is allocated to roots by the mangrove trees.
Values of δ13C varied between −20.641 to −28.409‰ in all six compartments. These increased values depicted that roots also act as a carbon sink and enrichment of roots with 13C may significantly differ from other parts of mangrove trees [46].
Due to the denitrification role of mangrove roots, it had a positive input of δ15N ranging from 4.473 to 9.863‰ in this study. Furthermore, roots that were closely intact with soil also affect the elemental concentration in relation to various environmental stresses.
Within the three age classes, a significant difference can be observed in isotopic ratios (Figure 7). It may be due to changes in humidity, temperature, salinity, or tidal inundation on the mangrove ecosystem with increasing age [47].

Sediment
Carbon concentration ranged from −28.82 to −31.27‰ in all six compartments ( Figure 7). This range was more than the expected range for wetlands [48]. This range could be more positive with sediment depth. Values of δ13C showed there was less saline stress on vegetation. These values also indicated less decomposition of organic matter in sediments. At Santa Catarina, Brazil [26], δ13C ranged from about −22 to −24.6‰, a value that was higher compared to our study. On the other hand, a study by Lacerda et al. [49] in Sepetiba Bay in Rio do Janeiro supports the outcomes of our study.
The N sediment isotope signatures were positive, ranging from 2.66 to 9.86‰ in all six compartments. This result illustrates that all six sites are categorized by an open nitrogen cycle [50] and denitrification increases the accumulation of 15N. Moreover, it provides evidence as these sites not being deficient in soil N, as is the case in Santa Catarina, Brazil mangrove plantation, but we cannot solely rely on δ15N for N abundance [7].

Sampling Site
The samples were collected from the Matang mangrove forest reserve. It is situated in Peninsular Malaysia at Perak. The total area of the MMFR is approximately 40,466 ha, and it is divided into four portions, which include Sungai Kerang, Kuala Sepetang South, Kuala Trong, and Kuala Sepetang North. These portions are subdivided into compartments (Compt.) for managerial purposes. Most compartments are classified as productive forests planted with Rhizophora apiculata and R. mucronata. However, several compartments are left untouched and are totally protected areas known as Virgin Jungle Reserve (VJR). The compartments which are used for timber extraction and undergo a thinning process by management are called managed compartments. On the other hand, the VJR and untouched compartments for many years are called unmanaged compartments. Six compartments were selected, three from Kuala Sepetang namely Compt. 18

Sample Collection
Transects were made in each compartment from seaward to landward. Three sample plots of 10 m × 10 m were made on this transect with equal gaps of 20 m between them. Based on our observation and inventory record from the Forestry Department, the dominant species in all compartments is Rhizophora apiculata except for Compt. 42 and Compt. 55 in which both R. apiculata and R. mucronata are dominant species. Because of that, five mature trees of R. apiculata were sampled. In order to increase the significance of the analysis, three replicates were made that resulted in a total of 270 samples (Table 4). Tree leaves were collected from those six compartments as explained in the study site above. For roots, samples of approximately 2 cm in diameter were collected at 7 cm depth. About 300 g of sediment samples were taken close to the sampled tree at about 7 cm depth from the sediment surface. All samples were placed in an ice box (4 • C) to avoid contamination and sample degradation after packing in zip-lock plastic bags individually [17,51].

Samples Preparation and Chemical Analysis
All collected samples were taken and processed in the soil laboratory at the Faculty of Forestry Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). Leaves and roots were rinsed with deionized water and all samples including sediment were dried at 60 • C to achieve a constant weight. Dried samples were ground by pestle and mortar and sieved using a 53 µm sieve. The digestion method was used for the homogeneity of ground samples by Zulkifli et al. [52] and Khan et al. [1]. In the digestion method, samples were briefly put in a digestion tube with concentrated nitric acid (HNO 3 ) and were heated on a digestion block for 1 h and followed by cooling at room temperature. Cooled samples were filtered using Whatman filter paper into a plastic container and diluted with distilled water to achieve a fixed volume. Elements Mg, P, Cd, Cu, Fe, K, Mn, Zn, Ca, Na, and Pb were directly analyzed using Shimadzu Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometer [(FAAS), model: AA-700, Japan] in the soil lab. The reference material is GSS-1 for sediments and GSV-2 for leaves. Phosphorus percentage (P %) was analyzed through the blue method [53] for all the samples. For finding the CNS percentage, a Trumac CNS Analyzer was used in the Faculty of Agriculture, UPM.

Stable Isotopes (13C and 15N) Samples Preparation and Analysis
Leaf and root samples were cleaned, washed, and dried at 60 • C to achieve a fixed weight. Dried samples were then ground to make a fine powder. For the removal of inorganic carbonates, the powdered samples were fumed with 12M HCl (analytical reagent (assay ≥ 37%); Sigma-Aldrich; USA) for at least 10 h [54]. For stable isotopes (13C and 15N) analysis, the samples were analyzed at the Malaysian Nuclear Agency, Bangi, Malaysia. A continuous flow isotopic ratio mass spectrometer with an elemental analyzer (CF-IRMS-EA) instrument was used to acquire stable carbon and nitrogen (13C/12C, 15N/14N) ratios. The stable carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios are expressed in delta (δ) notation (13C and δ15N) in units of parts per thousand (‰), as represented by the following equation: where X is 13C and 15N, and R is the corresponding ratio.

Data Analysis
The elemental composition of leaves, roots, and sediment was analyzed with SPSS version 25. Stable isotopes and elemental differences between compartments were analyzed through One-way ANOVA. Age-based compartment comparison of stable isotopes and elemental concentration were also analyzed through One-way ANOVA. To assess homogeneity and non-homogeneity within samples, Tukey Hsd and Dunnett tests were performed to compare the nutrients in all compartments. Tree parts and sediment samples of all the Compartments were differentiated into groups based on significant differences as shown in Tables 1-3.

Conclusions
Based on our study, compartment comparison gives the following average elemental concentration trend: Cd (S) < Pb (S) < Cu (S) < Zn (S) < Mg (S) < Mn (L) < K (L) < Fe (S) < Na (R) < Ca (R) and P% (S) < S% (S) < N% (L) < C% (R) in leaf, root and sediment samples. Leaves, roots, and sediment analysis for six compartments showed similar average elemental concentrations. The difference in elemental concentration is attributed to age or location. The mangrove forest regulates elements better than other forests. Sediments and roots are the main storage spaces for elements in the sampled mangrove area hence depicting that above-ground biomass is not a good sink for elemental storage. Sediment results however displayed an increase in elemental composition over time as compared to roots and leaves. Many elements in the three classes exhibited significant differences within the three age groups. These mangrove ecosystems have a high potential for carbon sequestration in sediments. Concentrations of Cu, Cd, Pb, Zn, Mn, Fe, P, and S were very high, particularly in sediment samples, which could be due to heavy metal pollution. The sources of these heavy metals and other elements such as N, P, and S, among others, can be from industries and agricultural activities in the catchment of the mangrove ecosystem under study. It is suggested to determine the risk assessment status of elemental concentration in sediments of the MMFR. This study provides baseline data for elements of different aged compartments, and it can be used for further research, comparison to different mangrove sites, and devising management policies.
All the elements in mangrove leaves, except for Cu, C, and S, have an impact on compartment variation, and for Rhizophora apiculata species aged 15 from other compartments and ages. Elements Fe, K, Zn, Mg, and Na have an impact on the variations between compartments 18 and 31. For mangrove sediment, compartments 18, 42, 71, and 74 were influenced by Cd, P, N, C, and S based on the three mangrove age groups.