Oil-Based Polymer Coatings on CAN Fertilizer in Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.) Nutrition

Fertilizer coating can increase the efficiency of N fertilizers and reduce their negative impact on the environment. This may be achieved by the utilization of biodegradable natural coating materials instead of polyurethane-based polymers. The aim of this study was to detect the effect of calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) fertilizer coated with modified conventional polyurethane enhanced with vegetable oils on the yield and quality of Brassica napus L. compared to CAN fertilizer with a vegetable oil-based polymer and to assess the risks of nitrogen loss. Three types of treatments were tested for both coated fertilizers: divided application (CAN, coated CAN), a single application of coated CAN, and a single application of CAN with coated CAN (1:2). A single application of coated CAN with both types of coating in the growth stage of the 9th true leaf significantly increased the yield, the thousand seed weight, and oil production compared to the uncoated CAN. The potential of using coated CAN may be seen in a slow nitrogen release ensuring the nitrogen demand for rapeseed plants throughout vegetation and eliminating the risk of its loss. The increased potential of NH4+ volatilization and NO3− leaching were determined using the uncoated CAN fertilizer compared to the coated variants. Oil-based polymer coatings on CAN fertilizer can be considered as an adequate replacement for partially modified conventional polyurethane.


Introduction
With the world's exponential population growth and diminishing of arable lands, the agriculture industry has faced a great challenge of crop and food resources for the past decades [1,2]. Predictions are that the earth's population could approach 9.5 billion by 2050, which may result in an almost double increase in food demand and crop production. In one specific example, cereal production is expected to increase from 940 million tons to 3 billion tons a year [3,4]. Satisfying increasing grain yield demands has been achieved by enhancing the use of mineral fertilizers to cropland soil. However, the excessive application of fertilizers presents one of the main sources of polluting soil (heavy metals), water (nitrates leaching into groundwater), and air environments (emission of greenhouse gases), which could be a threat to human health [5,6].
Nitrogen occupies a unique position among essential plant nutrients. Nitrogen and water availability are considered the two major limiting factors in plant growth and development of metabolic processes-nutrient distribution, photosynthesis, biomass, and ultimately yield building [7][8][9]. The deficiency of nitrogen strongly decreases chlorophyll content, enzymatic activity, photosynthesis, respiration rate, and yield of crops [10]. Nitrogen can be directly absorbed by plant roots in inorganic forms (mineral nitrogen) as ammonium (NH 4 + ) and nitrate (NO 3 − ). These forms are the key components of nitrogen fertilizers such as ammonium nitrate (AN) and urea included in the two most widespread nitrogen fertilizers [11].

Results and Discussion
The evaluation of the effect of coated fertilizers was created by comparing the data within the groups using the treatments with the same fertilizer application system (divided, single, and blends). Each method of fertilization was assigned with a control treatment (the treatments D and S). D served as the control variant for the group with a divided application, and S served as a control for the group with a single application and blends.

Yield and Oiliness of Rapeseed and N Content in Plant Biomass
The appropriate type of fertilizer and method of fertilization is important for the high yield production of rapeseed. Several studies describe the increase in yield and qualitative parameters of crops after using coated fertilizer application [38][39][40][41]. Our study showed that the use of coated CAN fertilizers has no negative effect on the yield and qualitative parameters of winter rapeseed. Statistical evaluation of the data shown in Figure 1 revealed no significant differences between the treatments in the groups with divided application (D, D-opu, D-o) and blends (S, Bl-opu, Bl-o). A significant positive effect was recorded in the group of treatments with a single application of coated CAN fertilizers (opu-CAN-oil-based polyurethane-coated CAN; o-CAN-oil-based polymer-coated CAN) in seed yields and oil contents. Seed yields of this group showed a trend of opu-CAN > o-CAN > CAN with opu-CAN up to 18% higher in comparison to the uncoated CAN. Similar results were recorded in the study by Tang et al. [42], in which a single basal application of coated nitrogen fertilizers contributed to the increase of the yield and rice quality in comparison to the divided application. A different trend was recorded in the case of the oil content that reached up to 5.5% higher after a single application of oil-coated CAN fertilizer compared to the use of the uncoated CAN fertilizer. The presumption was that the total nitrogen applied in the single application of coated fertilizers was released over a longer period of time and thus was present in the phase of the seed formation confirmed by Tian et al. [38]. In this study, the increase was recorded by an average of 17.3% after the application of coated fertilizers in rapeseed yield rates compared to the control. This study also proved that lower doses of the total N applied in coated fertilizers contributed to a yield increase of 14.2%, which confirmed their environmental potential in terms of nitrogen release. The study by Lu et al. [43] showed the positive effects of CRFs application on rapeseed yield manifested in the increase of rapeseed pods from 27 to 32% in comparison to non-coated urea. In comparison to the treatments with coated CAN fertilizers, a single application of the uncoated CAN (treatment S) proved the decline in the parameters of oil production and thousand seed weight (TSW) shown in Table 1. Similar positive effects of coated CAN fertilizers were proved on yield and qualitative parameters of rapeseed. It can be concluded that o-CAN may be a proper alternative instead of opu-CAN.

Figure 1.
Rates of yield and oiliness of rapeseed. The groups of the treatments D-divided application; S-single application; Bl-blend. The columns represent the mean (n = 4), error bars present the mean standard deviation (SD). The same letters at the bottom of the columns describe no statistically significant differences between the treatments (Fisher's LSD test, p ≤ 0.05). Each group of the treatment (D, S, Bl) was evaluated separately. Groups of treatments D-divided application, S-single application; Bl-blend; opu-oil-based polyurethane polymer, o-oil-based polymer, TSW-thousand seed weight. The same letters next to the numbers depict no statistically significant differences between the treatments (Fisher's LSD test, p ≤ 0.05). Each group of the treatment (divided, single, blend) was evaluated separately. The values represent the mean (n = 4) ± standard deviation (SD).
The data from Figure 2 indicate a connection between the yield rates and the nitrogen concentration in aboveground plant biomass. In general, plants can only consume a part of nutrients (in our case nitrogen) from conventional fertilizers, and the rest may be subject to losses to the environment [44]. This trend is mainly visible in the treatment with the application of conventional uncoated CAN fertilizer in a single dose (S), resulting in a significantly lower concentration of nitrogen in plant biomass in the growth stage of flower bud emergence (t2) compared to the growth stage of stem elongation (t1). This decrease indicates that the overdose of quickly released nitrogen in uncoated CAN fertilizer led to N-loss available for direct plant consumption and ultimately caused the lowest yield and oil content. The declining trend in the supply of the available form of N, released from conventional uncoated CAN, during the period and the increased supply of mineral N released from coated CAN is also evident from the assessment of N content in aboveground biomass ( Table 2). The nitrogen content in the plant shows a gradual release of Bl-blend. The columns represent the mean (n = 4), error bars present the mean standard deviation (SD). The same letters at the top of the columns describe no statistically significant differences between the treatments (Fisher's LSD test, p ≤ 0.05). Each group of the treatment (D, S, Bl) was evaluated separately.
The data from Figure 2 indicate a connection between the yield rates and the nitrogen concentration in aboveground plant biomass. In general, plants can only consume a part of nutrients (in our case nitrogen) from conventional fertilizers, and the rest may be subject to losses to the environment [44]. This trend is mainly visible in the treatment with the application of conventional uncoated CAN fertilizer in a single dose (S), resulting in a significantly lower concentration of nitrogen in plant biomass in the growth stage of flower bud emergence (t2) compared to the growth stage of stem elongation (t1). This decrease indicates that the overdose of quickly released nitrogen in uncoated CAN fertilizer led to N-loss available for direct plant consumption and ultimately caused the lowest yield and oil content. The declining trend in the supply of the available form of N, released from conventional uncoated CAN, during the period and the increased supply of mineral N released from coated CAN is also evident from the assessment of N content in aboveground biomass ( Table 2). The nitrogen content in the plant shows a gradual release of the available forms of this nutrient from the coated CAN that is particularly evident in the group of singly applied fertilizers (S). While the nitrogen content detected in the aboveground mass of rapeseed fertilized with uncoated CAN (S) was detected almost 4 and 2 times higher in the term t1 compared to the treatments with coated CAN (S-opu, S-o) in the term t2, the nitrogen content of the treatments fertilized with coated fertilizers was increased. These values show that the oil-coated CAN is able to release nitrogen more rapidly than the oil-based, polyurethane-coated CAN and thus may supply the plant's demand for this nutrient. Nitrogen contents in plants, treated with coated fertilizers applied in blends with conventional CAN (Bl-opu, Bl-o), can confirm this trend.
The relationship between the optimal nitrogen supply and its impact on the yield and oil content of rapeseed is described in many studies [45,46]. A similar trend was recorded in the treatments with coated CAN fertilizers applied in blends with the uncoated CAN fertilizer (Bl-opu, Bl-o). Nitrogen content in plant biomass in the growth stage of stem elongation decreased about 1.3% and 0.9% compared to the uncoated CAN fertilizer applied in a single dose. The N content in plant rapeseed showed the most even N pumping during vegetation in the variant with divided application and a single application of coated CAN fertilizers. oil content of rapeseed is described in many studies [45,46]. A similar trend was recorded in the treatments with coated CAN fertilizers applied in blends with the uncoated CAN fertilizer (Bl-opu, Bl-o). Nitrogen content in plant biomass in the growth stage of stem elongation decreased about 1.3% and 0.9% compared to the uncoated CAN fertilizer applied in a single dose. The N content in plant rapeseed showed the most even N pumping during vegetation in the variant with divided application and a single application of coated CAN fertilizers.
.    Groups of treatments D-divided application, S-single application; Bl-blend; opu-oil-based polyurethane polymer, o-oil-based polymer. The same letters next to the numbers depict no statistically significant differences between the treatments (Fisher's LSD test, p ≤ 0.05). Each group of the treatment (divided, single, blend) was evaluated separately. The values represent the mean (n = 4) ± standard deviation (SD).

Mineral Nitrogen Content in the Soil
The release of nitrogen from coated CAN fertilizers significantly affected the dynamic change of the soil mineral N (N min ) content in the growth process of rapeseed. Contents of N min and its ionic forms (NO 3 − , NH 4 + ) were determined in the soil in three experimental phases (t1-t3,). Although, enough of the available nitrogen can be essential for direct plant consumption. The excessive content may inevitably increase its loss in soil [47]. Average contents of N min in soil (without differencing into layers), shown in Table 3, serve as an overview of nitrogen release development in the treatments during the rapeseed vegetation. Groups of treatments D-divided application, S-single application; Bl-blend; opu-oil-based polyurethane polymer, o-oil-based polymer. The same letters next to the numbers describe no statistically significant differences between the treatments (Fisher's LSD test, p ≤ 0.05). Each group of the treatment (divided, single, blend) was evaluated separately. The values represent the mean (n = 4) ± standard deviation (SD).
One of the important aspects of coated fertilizers is the longevity of nutrient release in sufficient levels for plant uptake. The use of coated CAN fertilizers in each form of the application (D, S, and Bl) has shown a positive effect on N min release pattern, as can be seen from Figure 3. The effect was visible, especially in the period between the first (t1) and the second term (t2) of soil samples collection that was significantly milder compared to conventional uncoated CAN.  The relatively accelerated release of nitrogen was observed in high Nmin concentration after the application of fertilizers (t1 single application, t2 divided application) in the treatments with conventional uncoated CAN shown in Table 3. Rapid release Nmin was visible mainly in the single application in which Nmin concentration decreased rapidly up to 65.4% between t1 and t2 (up to 22 days). Our assumption was that although the part of the soil Nmin was obtained from the soil through plant roots, the great contrast in Nmin concentration was due to N loss (NH4 + volatilization and NO3 − leaching) between t1 and t2. On the contrary, the data of the soil samples, collected in the harvest time The relatively accelerated release of nitrogen was observed in high N min concentration after the application of fertilizers (t1 single application, t2 divided application) in the treatments with conventional uncoated CAN shown in Table 3. Rapid release N min was visible mainly in the single application in which N min concentration decreased rapidly up to 65.4% between t1 and t2 (up to 22 days). Our assumption was that although the part of the soil N min was obtained from the soil through plant roots, the great contrast in N min concentration was due to N loss (NH 4 + volatilization and NO 3 − leaching) between t1 and t2. On the contrary, the data of the soil samples, collected in the harvest time (t3), showed relatively high levels of N min in the treatments with divided (especially D-o) and single (S-opu, S-o) application of fertilizers in comparison with conventional CAN treatments. Dynamic of gradual N min release was most visible after a single application of both coated CAN (S-opu, S-o) with no definite decrease in N min content in t3. A single application of oil-based polyurethane-coated CAN fertilizer (S-opu) caused an increase by 14.2% in t3 in mineral nitrogen content compared to t2 in soil. These findings corresponded to the data of yield and qualitative parameters (Figure 1), in which a single application of coated CAN fertilizer (S-opu) proved to be the most effective. The assumption was that the amount of released nitrogen reached sufficient levels for the plant demand in the time of the experiment duration from these treatments, thus leading to the increased nitrogen use efficiency and subsequently to a more positive environmental impact (lower risk of N loss). Our data are consistent with the findings of Xiao et al. [48], who described that the total N min content continued gradually to an increase in the top layer of soil on the ninetieth day after the application of coated fertilizers, while high levels were maintained in the middle and bottom layer of soil.
The positive effect of coated CAN fertilizers on N min content was also visible in the nitrogen distribution between soil layers during the experiment ( Figure 3). The application of conventional uncoated CAN fertilizer (D and S treatment) showed high N min concentrations mainly in the top and middle layers of the soil right after fertilization. The treatments with coated CAN fertilizers showed that N min content was, in general, focused mainly on the top layer of the soil during t1 and t2. N min content was evenly distributed between each layer of the soil in the harvest time (t3). This indicates that both coated CAN fertilizers (opu-CAN and o-CAN) proved a high ability of gradual nitrogen release leading to more efficient nitrogen use by the plant and a reduction in the environmental risk. A gradual N min release by coated fertilizers was also described in the study by Zheng et al. [49], who found that the application of coated fertilizers resulted in enhanced N min concentration in soil, especially during later crop stages.
Considering the placement of the fertilizers (the placement on the soil surface without incorporation to the soil), the highest potential for the NH 4 + volatilization is most likely to be closest to the soil surface [50]. Ammonium nitrate (used CAN in our experiment), depending on N dose and irrigation, belongs to the conventional nitrogen fertilizers with a high potential of NH 4 + volatilization [51]. This assumption was confirmed by the data obtained from the top layer of the soil samples ( Figure 4). The data showed the greatest potential for NH 4 + volatilization in the treatments with conventional uncoated CAN (D and S treatments) expressed in significantly high NH 4 + concentrations in t1 and t2. Analogous to N min , the uncoated CAN potential of volatilization was visible between t1 and t2, in which the NH 4 + concentration decreased up to 39.8% in soil. Higher NH 4 + concentrations were accountable to the use of conventional uncoated CAN (1/3 of the total N dose) after the application of blend fertilizers (Bl-opu, Bl-o). Similarly, the S variant (a single application of uncoated CAN) was resolved in its rapid release. NH 4 + contents in Bl-opu and Bl-o were detected almost over half lower in t1 than in the S treatment; therefore, major risks of NH 4 + losses were not found. In addition to the volatilization, a rapid NH 4 + release also presents the risk of the increased concentration of nitrates as an initial component of nitrification in soil and thus increased the risk of NO 3 − leaching [52]. The positive effect of coated fertilizers was expressed by significantly lower NH 4 + concentrations during t1-t3 in comparison to conventional uncoated CAN. The data were indirectly consistent with the findings of Xiao et al. [48], who mentioned that the application of coated fertilizers resulted in lower NH 4 + rates in soil samples in comparison to conventional uncoated nitrogen fertilizer. A gradual NH 4 + release was also expressed by the increase of showed significantly higher NH 4 + contents in t3 treatments compared to the treatments with conventional uncoated CAN. On the contrary, NH 4 + contents showed no significant difference in the S treatment in Bl-opu and Bl-o. This led to an assumption that all nitrogen contained in coated fertilizers and applied in blends was released during the rapeseed vegetation, predetermining the blend application as the most suitable alternative.  Contents of NO3 − were monitored as the main potential source of N loss in the soil samples due to their high leaching ability. One of the first studies by Liegel and Walsh from 1976 [53] proved that the application of controlled-release N fertilizers was the most effective technique in sandy irrigated soils with a high risk of nitrate leaching. Preventing the leaching of nitrates presents one of the greatest environmental challenges in terms of nitrogen fertilizer use. The estimation of the potential for N losses due to the NO3 − leaching from the experimental treatments were provided by the isolation of the data from the bottom and middle layers of soil. The data obtained from the middle layer (ML) of the soil ( Figure 5) served for the evaluation of potential NO3 − migration to the lower layers of the soil, which might consequently lead to its leaching into the groundwater. The data obtained from the bottom layer (BL) of the soil ( Figure 6) served to evaluate the potential of nitrates leaching to the groundwater during the rapeseed vegetation and directly after its harvest. Contents of NO 3 − were monitored as the main potential source of N loss in the soil samples due to their high leaching ability. One of the first studies by Liegel and Walsh from 1976 [53] proved that the application of controlled-release N fertilizers was the most effective technique in sandy irrigated soils with a high risk of nitrate leaching. Preventing the leaching of nitrates presents one of the greatest environmental challenges in terms of nitrogen fertilizer use. The estimation of the potential for N losses due to the NO 3 − leaching from the experimental treatments were provided by the isolation of the data from the bottom and middle layers of soil. The data obtained from the middle layer (ML) of the soil ( Figure 5) served for the evaluation of potential NO 3 − migration to the lower layers of the soil, which might consequently lead to its leaching into the groundwater. The data obtained from the bottom layer (BL) of the soil ( Figure 6) served to evaluate the potential of nitrates leaching to the groundwater during the rapeseed vegetation and directly after its harvest.
As predicted, significantly, the highest potential for NO 3 − leaching was due to rapid nitrogen release from conventional uncoated CAN fertilizers recorded in single or divided CAN application. The potential for NO 3 − leaching after uncoated CAN application was possible to confirm from the data of NO 3 − concentrations in t1 and t2 shown in Figures 5 and 6. The NO 3 − content of ML and BL was detected over three times higher (>3.3) in the treatment fertilized with a single application of uncoated CAN in t1 compared to the treatments with coated CAN fertilizers. The data showed that the NO 3 − decrease was found up to 73.9% in ML and up to 75.5% in BL in the S treatment between t1 and t2. Considering the amount and duration (up to 14 days), it is most likely that nitrates of the uncoated CAN fertilizer were lost due to the nitrate leaching. These findings corresponded with the data by Zhang et al. [54], who discovered that the rates of the leached nitrates  As predicted, significantly, the highest potential for NO3 − leaching was due to rapid nitrogen release from conventional uncoated CAN fertilizers recorded in single or divided CAN application. The potential for NO3 − leaching after uncoated CAN application was possible to confirm from the data of NO3 − concentrations in t1 and t2 shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. The NO3 − content of ML and BL was detected over three times higher (>3.  As predicted, significantly, the highest potential for NO3 − leaching was due to rapid nitrogen release from conventional uncoated CAN fertilizers recorded in single or divided CAN application. The potential for NO3 − leaching after uncoated CAN application was possible to confirm from the data of NO3 − concentrations in t1 and t2 shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. The NO3 − content of ML and BL was detected over three times higher (>3. Identical to N min and NH 4 + , the positive effect of coated CAN fertilizers was recorded in the form of gradual NO 3 − release over the course of the whole experiment. Gradual release of nitrates was discovered to be the most visible between t2 and t3 in coated fertilizers. The increased NO 3 − contents were observed up to 64.7% in ML and up to 119.9% in BL. While the NO 3 − amount was decreased in ML and BL in the treatments fertilized with uncoated CAN, the coated CAN fertilizers were able to supply the plants with nitrogen even in the later stages of the development. Compared to the low levels of NO 3 − content in the treatments with conventional CAN fertilizers (due to rapid nitrogen release and subsequent N loss). This increase correlated with the data of seed yield and qualitative parameters (Figure 1) and can be used as a potential supply of available nitrogen for the next crops. The data correlated with the findings of Xiao et al. [48]. Similar N min release (especially NO 3 − ) was proved using oil-based polymer-coated CAN, which can be a proper alternative for oil-based polyurethane-coated CAN. This fact is not suitable for future use due to polyurethane's lower biodegradability. The positive effect of coated fertilizers on nitrates leaching was recorded in several studies [55][56][57][58].

Materials and Methods
The pot experiment was performed under controlled conditions in the vegetation hall of Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic (49 • 12 36.94" N and 16 • 36 49.95" E).

Plant Material and Growth Conditions
Rapeseed (Brassica napus subs. napus) cv. DK Exception (Bayer s.r.o, Prague, Czech Republic) was used in this study. Mitscherlich pots (STOMA GmbH, Siegburg, Germany) were filled with 6 kg of air-dried and <2 cm sieved soil and placed in the vegetation hall. The properties of the used soil for the pot experiment are shown in Table 4. Ten seeds of rapeseed were sown in 2 cm depth in each pot. Three weeks after sowing, the number of rapeseed plants was adjusted to three plants per pot.

Experimental Design
In the experiment, coated CAN fertilizers were compared with a conventional uncoated CAN. The same total dose of nitrogen was applied in all treatments using different N sources such as calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN, up to 13% N-NH 4 + and 13% N-NO 3 − , Lovochemie a.s., Lovosice, the Czech Republic), oil-based polyurethane-coated CAN (opu-CAN) and oil-based polymer-coated CAN (o-CAN). Coated fertilizers were prepared by spreading the coating on conventional fertilizer CAN using the LDP-3 fluidized bed granulating machine (Changzhou Jiafa Granulating Drying Equipment Co., Ltd., Changzhou, China). The coating consisted of oil-based polyurethane polymer (opu-CAN-coating up to 7.6 wt.%, up to 13% N-NH 4 + and 13% N-NO 3 − , VUCHT a.s., Bratislava, Slovakia) and oil-based polymer (o-CAN-coating up to 6.1 wt.%-triglycerides of fatty acids, up to 75 wt.% of which unsaturated were up to 45 wt.%, polylactic acid up to 10 wt.%, up to 13% N-NH 4 + and 13% N-NO 3 − , VUCHT a.s., Bratislava, Slovakia). The composition of the polyurethane-based coating (opu-CAN) differed from the conventional polyurethanes prepared by the reaction of the diisocyanates with the polymeric diols. The polymeric diols were replaced with the vegetable oil having hydroxy groups in its structure. The prepolymer, obtained by this way, was finally applied in the crosslinking. These modifications led to a substantial increase in the biodegradable fraction of the coating. The prepolymer was completely replaced with a more biodegradable component in the oil-based coating (o-CAN). The biodegradable fraction of the coating material is further increased in this way.
The individual treatments and fertilizer addition are detailed in Table 5. The fertilizers were applied to the soil surface. Each treatment was replicated 8 times in a complete randomized block design in the vegetation hall (Figure 7). N sources such as calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN, up to 13% N-NH4 + and 13% N-NO3 − , Lovochemie a.s., Lovosice, the Czech Republic), oil-based polyurethane-coated CAN (opu-CAN) and oil-based polymer- coated CAN (o-CAN). Coated fertilizers were prepared by spreading the coating on conventional fertilizer CAN using the LDP-3 fluidized bed granulating machine (Changzhou Jiafa Granulating Drying Equipment Co., Ltd., Changzhou, China). The coating consisted of oil-based polyurethane polymer (opu-CAN-coating up to 7.6 wt.%, up to 13% N-NH4 + and 13% N-NO3 − , VUCHT a.s., Bratislava, Slovakia) and oil-based polymer (o-CAN-coating up to 6.1 wt.%-triglycerides of fatty acids, up to 75 wt.% of which unsaturated were up to 45 wt.%, polylactic acid up to 10 wt.%, up to 13% N-NH4 + and 13% N-NO3 − , VUCHT a.s., Bratislava, Slovakia). The composition of the polyurethane-based coating (opu-CAN) differed from the conventional polyurethanes prepared by the reaction of the diisocyanates with the polymeric diols. The polymeric diols were replaced with the vegetable oil having hydroxy groups in its structure. The prepolymer, obtained by this way, was finally applied in the crosslinking. These modifications led to a substantial increase in the biodegradable fraction of the coating. The prepolymer was completely replaced with a more biodegradable component in the oilbased coating (o-CAN). The biodegradable fraction of the coating material is further increased in this way.
The individual treatments and fertilizer addition are detailed in Table 5. The fertilizers were applied to the soil surface. Each treatment was replicated 8 times in a complete randomized block design in the vegetation hall (Figure 7). The treatments of fertilizer were divided into 3 groups according to the term of application and the type of fertilizer chosen. The first group was the divided application of fertilizers (the designation of the treatments with D). The total nitrogen dose was divided into two parts; the first was applied by the conventional uncoated CAN in the 1st term (1st Fertilization), the second dose was applied by uncoated CAN (treatment D) and coated CAN (treatments D-opu and D-o) in 2nd term (2nd Fertilization). The second and third groups consisted of treatments with a single application of total nitrogen dose in one term (1st Fertilization), where fertilizers of one type (the designation of the treatments with S) and fertilizers of a mixture (the designation of the treatments with Bl) were applied. The fertilizer mixtures (Bl) were created by mixing conventional CAN and coated CAN in a 1:2 ratio (converted to N rate). The treatments of fertilizer were divided into 3 groups according to the term of application and the type of fertilizer chosen. The first group was the divided application of fertilizers (the designation of the treatments with D). The total nitrogen dose was divided into two parts; the first was applied by the conventional uncoated CAN in the 1st term (1st Fertilization), the second dose was applied by uncoated CAN (treatment D) and coated CAN (treatments D-opu and D-o) in 2nd term (2nd Fertilization). The second and third groups consisted of treatments with a single application of total nitrogen dose in one term (1st Fertilization), where fertilizers of one type (the designation of the treatments with S) and fertilizers of a mixture (the designation of the treatments with Bl) were applied. The fertilizer mixtures (Bl) were created by mixing conventional CAN and coated CAN in a 1:2 ratio (converted to N rate).
The pot experiment was carried out under semi-natural conditions (under a rain shelter) in the vegetative hall. Figure 8 shows the average daily temperature and the average daily relative humidity during the experiment. A controlled watering regime, used identical for all treatments (pots), was in the experiment. Plants were watered to 70% of maximum water holding capacity throughout the growing season. The pots were hand-watered with demineralized water on the soil surface.
Rapeseed plants were harvested manually by cutting above the soil surface from each pot. The rapeseed was threshed using a laboratory thresher (HALDRUP LT-20, Haldrup GmbH, Ilshofen, Germany).
The rape seeds were purified from coarse impurities by repetitive sifting. Rapeseed yield was measured in three plants within each pot, and the value was adjusted to 9% of moisture. Seed yield was determined by weighing (laboratory scale PCB Kern, KERN & Sohn GmbH, Balingen, Germany) and exceeded as gram per pot (g/pot). Seeds were then counted and hand-ground in mortar for further analysis of the oil content.  Groups of treatments D-divided application, S-single application; Bl-blend; opu-oil-based polyurethane polymer, o-oil-based polymer.
The pot experiment was carried out under semi-natural conditions (under a rain shelter) in the vegetative hall. Figure 8 shows the average daily temperature and the average daily relative humidity during the experiment. A controlled watering regime, used identical for all treatments (pots), was in the experiment. Plants were watered to 70% of maximum water holding capacity throughout the growing season. The pots were hand-watered with demineralized water on the soil surface. Rapeseed plants were harvested manually by cutting above the soil surface from each pot. The rapeseed was threshed using a laboratory thresher (HALDRUP LT-20, Haldrup GmbH, Ilshofen, Germany).
The rape seeds were purified from coarse impurities by repetitive sifting. Rapeseed yield was measured in three plants within each pot, and the value was adjusted to 9% of moisture. Seed yield was determined by weighing (laboratory scale PCB Kern, KERN & Sohn GmbH, Balingen, Germany) and exceeded as gram per pot (g/pot). Seeds were then counted and hand-ground in mortar for further analysis of the oil content.

Plants and Soil Sampling
The evaluation of soil mineral nitrogen content (NO 3 − , NH 4 + ) and nutritional plant properties was provided in the soil samples and plant biomass collected in the specific experimental phases shown in Table 6. The collection of the soil samples was carried out by a probe with the aligned tip. After the collection, the soil profile was divided in three zones for the observation of mineral nitrogen movement in soil and subsequently frozen for further analysis (Figure 9).

Plants and Soil Sampling
The evaluation of soil mineral nitrogen content (NO3 − , NH4 + ) and nutritional plant properties was provided in the soil samples and plant biomass collected in the specific experimental phases shown in Table 6. The collection of the soil samples was carried out by a probe with the aligned tip. After the collection, the soil profile was divided in three zones for the observation of mineral nitrogen movement in soil and subsequently frozen for further analysis (Figure 9). The plant biomass was dried at 50 °C and homogenized to determine the nitrogen content in the dry matter. The plant biomass was dried at 50 • C and homogenized to determine the nitrogen content in the dry matter.

Analytical Methods
The N min determination was provided according to the methodology by Zbíral et al. [62], who described that nitrate and ammonium nitrogen was extracted from the soils with a solution of neutral salt (1% of K 2 SO 4 ). The NH 4 + determination was carried out spectrophotometrically (λ 660 nm ). The NO 3 − contents were determined by ISE (Ion Selective Electrode) [63].
The nitrogen determination was provided in aboveground plant biomass according to the methodology by Zbíral et al. [64]. Nitrogen contents were determined by the Kjeldahl method using the Kjeltec 2300 device (Foss, Hillerød, Denmark).
The thousand seed weight (TSW) determination was performed using a laboratory counter MK (MEZOS spol. s r.o., Hradec Králové, the Czech Republic). The determination was carried out by weighing the number of 2 × 500 seeds to prevent possible measurement errors.
The determination of seed oil content was provided according to the methodology of the Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture [65]. The oil content was determined gravimetrically after the extraction of the samples with diethyl ether using the Soxhlet method based on the NMR extraction of rapeseeds in a continuous flow extractor Minispec mq series TD-NMR (Bruker Corporation, Ettlinger, Germany).

Statistical Analysis
The effect of the treatment on the evaluated parameters was statistically analyzed in the STATISTICA 12 program (TIBCO Software, San Jose, CA, USA) [66]. The effect of the treatment on the seed yield, oiliness, oil production, thousand seed weight, nitrogen concentration and content in aboveground plant biomass and the content of mineral nitrogen (ammonium and nitrate) in soil were analyzed separately for each group of the treatment (divided, single and blend application of fertilizers). The normality and homogeneity of variances were verified, respectively, by Shapiro-Wilk and Levene values at p ≤ 0.05. The influence of the monitored factors was analyzed via analysis of variance (level of significance p ≤ 0.05). The effect of the treatment on the mentioned parameters was analyzed using two-way analyses of variance with the treatment such as fixed effect and the pot used as the random effect to take into account the grouping of individuals in the same pot. The differences between the means were evaluated by the Fisher's (LSD) test.

Conclusions
The use of coated CAN fertilizer proves the potential to gradually release acceptable nitrogen during the growing season in winter rape nutrition and thus continuously meet the needs of plants. Compared to the effect of conventional CAN, the use of coated CAN fertilizers has been shown to increase the efficiency of nitrogen fertilization and reduce its losses. A suitable method seems to be the application of a mixture of conventional CAN and coated CAN in a ratio of 1:2 during spring fertilization, ensuring a sufficient amount of rapidly releasing N during the regeneration of rapeseed and its slower release during further developmental stages. The CAN fertilizer coated with a biodegradable oil-based polymer proves the ability to release the optimum amount of nitrogen for canola nutrition.