IgG Fc-Binding Peptide-Conjugated Pan-CoV Fusion Inhibitor Exhibits Extended In Vivo Half-Life and Synergistic Antiviral Effect When Combined with Neutralizing Antibodies

The peptide-based pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor EK1 is in phase III clinical trials, and it has, thus far, shown good clinical application prospects against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants. To further improve its in vivo long-acting property, we herein developed an Fc-binding strategy by conjugating EK1 with human immunoglobulin G Fc-binding peptide (IBP), which can exploit the long half-life advantage of IgG in vivo. The newly engineered peptide IBP-EK1 showed potent and broad-spectrum inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, including various Omicron sublineages and other human coronaviruses (HCoVs) with low cytotoxicity. In mouse models, IBP-EK1 possessed potent prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy against lethal HCoV-OC43 challenge, and it showed good safety profile and low immunogenicity. More importantly, IBP-EK1 exhibited a significantly extended in vivo half-life in rhesus monkeys of up to 37.7 h, which is about 20-fold longer than that reported for EK1. Strikingly, IBP-EK1 displayed strong in vitro or ex vivo synergistic anti-HCoV effect when combined with monoclonal neutralizing antibodies, including REGN10933 or S309, suggesting that IBP-conjugated EK1 can be further developed as a long-acting, broad-spectrum anti-HCoV agent, either alone or in combination with neutralizing antibodies, to combat the current COVID-19 pandemic or future outbreaks caused by emerging and re-emerging highly pathogenic HCoVs.

In the field of anti-HCoV agents, anti-CoV peptide fusion inhibitors can target conserved sites on the CoV S2 subunit to inhibit viral entry into cells, including 229E-HR2P derived from the HCoV-229E HR2 region [23], SARS-CoV fusion-inhibitory peptides derived from its HR2 region [24,25], and MERS-CoV HR2-derived peptide fusion inhibitors [26][27][28].In previous studies, our team developed the first pan-CoV fusion inhibitory peptide, EK1 [29].With origins in the HcoV-OC43 HR2 region (Figure 1a), EK1 targets the highly conserved heptad repeat 1 (HR1) region among HcoVs and thus blocks the formation of a six-helix bundle (6-HB) to effectively forestall virus entry into target cells.However, molecular weights of the abovementioned peptide-based fusion inhibitors are usually small (<10 kDa), leading to their rapid clearance by glomerular filtration in the systemic circulation [30,31].As a result, the in vivo halflives of EK1 and similar peptide fusion inhibitors are short [32], needing frequent administration to maintain their required antiviral concentrations.This calls for the development of universal and long-acting strategies to slow down in vivo elimination and improve the bioavailability of CoV peptide-based fusion inhibitors.
With an inverse relationship between the renal clearance rate of protein-based biologics and their molecular weight [33], most long-acting strategies to reduce renal filtration and prolong half-life were achieved through increasing the (apparent) molecular weight of protein-based biologics.Currently, several marketed peptide drugs have adopted different strategies to optimize half-life, including conjugating polymers (e.g., polyethylene glycol (PEG) [34], fusion with long-circulating segments (hIgG Fc domain or human serum albumin (HSA) [35], or conjugating fatty acid chains (e.g., acylation)).These strategies have their own advantages but also shortcomings, as finally revealed by clinical application and research.Peptide PEGylation has contributed to issues like immunogenicity and safety [36][37][38], leading to adverse events and decreased therapeutic efficacy.Fusion with IgG Fc domain or albumin accounts for high molecular weight and thus increases steric hindrance, affects permeability, and reduces efficacy [39].Accordingly, it is indispensable to develop novel long-acting strategies to improve the pharmacokinetics, especially the half-life, of CoV peptide fusion inhibitors in circulation, while also retaining their activity and safety.
In recent years, ligands in noncovalent combination with plasma proteins, including, for example, HSA and hIgG, have been extensively studied [40,41], and novel long-acting strategies for peptides based on these ligands have also attracted increasing attention.As a member of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily, human immunoglobulin G (hIgG) is quite abundant in the serum, with a long half-life of up to 21 days [42], while conjugating IgG-binding ligands is less studied.DeLano et al. identified a 13-mer short peptide with high binding affinity to IgG Fc domain, termed Fc-III, after several rounds of in vitro screening of a bacteriophage display peptide library [43].This peptide contains two cysteines (Cys), forming an internal disulfide bond, and thus displays as cyclic, specifically binding to the C H 2 and C H 3 interface of Fc domain.Considering the low molecular weight, simple structure, and nonbacterial origin of Fc-III [41], it is expected that conjugation of CoV peptide fusion inhibitors with Fc-III could retain their original advantages, including potent antiviral efficacy, safety profile, and low immunogenicity.Based on the abundance and the long half-life property of IgG in serum, conjugated peptides are expected to bind to IgG in vivo, thereby slowing down the elimination rate and extending the original half-life.Another promising therapeutic avenue is the application of conjugated peptides combined with monoclonal neutralizing antibodies, which are also IgG.Therefore, in this study, we used EK1 as a prototype model based on the IgG-binding peptide Fc-III and developed an Fc-binding strategy through conjugation with human immunoglobulin G Fc-binding peptide (IBP), or IBP-EK1, with the aim of generating a universal, long-acting, and broad-spectrum anti-CoV peptide fusion inhibitor.cysteines (Cys), forming an internal disulfide bond, and thus displays as cyclic, specifically binding to the CH2 and CH3 interface of Fc domain.Considering the low molecular weight, simple structure, and nonbacterial origin of Fc-III [41], it is expected that conjugation of CoV peptide fusion inhibitors with Fc-III could retain their original advantages, including potent antiviral efficacy, safety profile, and low immunogenicity.Based on the abundance and the long half-life property of IgG in serum, conjugated peptides are expected to bind to IgG in vivo, thereby slowing down the elimination rate and extending the original half-life.Another promising therapeutic avenue is the application of conjugated peptides combined with monoclonal neutralizing antibodies, which are also IgG.Therefore, in this study, we used EK1 as a prototype model based on the IgG-binding peptide Fc-III and developed an Fc-binding strategy through conjugation with human immunoglobulin G Fc-binding peptide (IBP), or IBP-EK1, with the aim of generating a universal, long-acting, and broad-spectrum anti-CoV peptide fusion inhibitor.We took several steps to realize this outcome.First, we designed IBP-conjugated peptides and detected their inhibitory activities, finally determining that IBP-EK1 had the best activity.Then, we demonstrated that IBP-EK1 showed stable inhibitory activity against all tested SARS-CoV-2 variants, especially the Omicron sublineages.IBP-EK1 also showed broadly inhibitory activity against other HCoVs in vitro, and it was effective in vivo to prevent and treat newborn mice challenged with HCoV-OC43.These results indicate that the strategy of IBP conjugation retained the original structure and inhibitory mechanism of EK1 but also acquired the feature of IBP's intrinsic binding to IgG, significantly improving the proteolytic tolerance of EK1.After confirming the in vivo safety profile of IBP-EK1, we further evaluated the serum half-life (t 1/2 ) of IBP-EK1 in rhesus monkeys, which was obviously prolonged compared with that of EK1.Meanwhile, we found the in vitro and ex vivo synergistic effects of IBP-EK1 when combined with monoclonal neutralizing antibodies (hIgG) targeting the receptor-binding domain (RBD) to inhibit sarbecovirus PsV, mainly SARS-CoV-2 variants.Collectively, these results suggest that IBP conjugation with CoV fusion inhibitory peptide is a promising long-acting strategy and that IBP-EK1 is a candidate for development as a long-acting and broad-spectrum antiviral agent to prevent and treat infection by SARS-CoV-2 variants, as well as other HCoVs, either alone or in combination with neutralizing antibodies.

Cell Lines, Viruses, Peptides, and Plasmids
Caco-2, Calu-3, RD, and 293T cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA).Huh-7 cells were obtained from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China).All cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS).

Inhibition of HCoV S-Mediated Cell-Cell Fusion
(1) The establishment and detection of cell-cell fusion assays mediated by S proteins of multiple HCoVs were as previously described [29,45].In brief, 293T cells were transfected with the pAAV-S-IRES-EGFP fusion plasmids, as described in Section 2.1, to obtain 293T/S/EGFP cells, respectively, which were adopted as the effector cells.Caco-2 cells, expressing various HCoV receptors on the membrane surface, were used as target cells, as described below.
For SARS-CoV S-, WIV1 S-, OC43 S-, or NL63 S-mediated cell-cell fusion assays, effector cells and target cells were cocultured in DMEM containing trypsin (80 ng/mL) for 4 h, while for SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV S-mediated cell-cell fusion assays, effector cells and target cells were cocultured in DMEM without trypsin for 2 h.After incubation, five fields in each well were randomly selected for counting the fused and unfused cells under an inverted fluorescence microscope (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA).The percentage of cell-cell fusion ((number of fused cells/number of fused and unfused cells) × 100%) was then calculated.
(2) The inhibitory activity of a peptide on HCoV S-mediated cell-cell fusion was determined, as previously described [29,45].Briefly, a total of 2.5 × 10 4 cells/well target cells (Caco-2) were incubated for 12 h.Afterwards, 10 4 cells/well effector cells (293T/S/EGFP) were added in the presence or absence of a peptide at the indicated concentrations at 37 • C for 2-4 h.After counting fused and unfused cells, the percentage of cell-cell fusion was calculated, as described above.The percent inhibition of cell-cell fusion was calculated using the following formula: (1 − E/P) × 100%, where "E" represents the percentage of cell-cell fusion in the peptide group, and "P" represents the percentage of cell-cell fusion in the positive control group, consisting of 293T/S/EGFP effector cells to which only DMEM was added.Samples were tested in triplicate, and all experiments were repeated twice.
(2) To detect the inhibitory activity of a peptide on infection of pseudotyped HCoV, target cells (Caco-2 for all tested CoVs, 0.7 × 10 4 cells/well; Calu-3 for SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, and HCoV-NL63, 1.5 × 10 4 cells/well) were plated at an appropriate density per well in a 96-well plate 24 h prior to infection.Pseudoviruses were mixed with an equal volume of serially diluted peptide solutions (with non-FBS DMEM), and the mixtures were incubated at 37 • C for 40 min, followed by transfer to the 96-well plate with target cells.Supernatants were replaced after 10~12 h and incubated for another 48 h.Luciferase activities were determined by the Luciferase Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and detected by the Multimode Reader (Tecan, Maennedorf, Switzerland) [27].

Inhibition of Live HCoV Replication
(1) The inhibition assay for live SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant was performed in the Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3) Laboratory in Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, as described previously [32].Serially diluted peptide solutions were mixed with an equal volume of live SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant (100 TCID 50 ), incubated at 37 • C for 30 min, and then added to precultured Calu-3 cells.After 2 h of incubation at 37 • C, the supernatant was replaced with DMEM containing 2% FBS.After incubation for an additional 48 h, the supernatants were harvested and collected in freezing tubes containing TRIzol™ LS Reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by storage at −80 • C. The Total RNA Extraction Kit (Tiangen Biochem Ltd., Beijing, China) was used to extract RNA from the supernatant samples.Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay was performed to determine RNA copies by using the N gene probe and One Step PrimeScript TM RT-PCR Kit (Takara, Shiga, Japan).
(2) The inhibitory activity of the tested peptide against HCoV-OC43 replication in RD cells or HCoV-229E replication in Huh-7 cells was evaluated [45].Briefly, 60 µL of HCoVs (100 TCID 50 ) was mixed with an equal volume of serially diluted peptide solutions and incubated at 37 • C for 40 min.Afterwards, the mixtures were added to RD or Huh-7 cells in a 96-well microplate.Supernatants were replaced after 6~8 h and incubated for an additional 48 h.The cytopathic effect caused by HCoV infection was determined by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8; Dojindo, Japan) assay and measured by the Multi-Detection Microplate Reader (Tecan, Maennedorf, Switzerland) at a wavelength of 450 nm (OD 450 ).

In Vivo Protective Study against Live HCoV-OC43 Infection
Newborn mice were bred from pregnant ICR mice (17 days) purchased from Slac Laboratory Animal Ltd. (Shanghai, China).All related experiments were carried out in strict accordance with institutional regulations.Ten suckling mice (3-day-old) were allocated randomly to each group.Mice in the prophylactic and therapeutic groups were intranasally administered with peptide (10 mg/kg in 4 µL of PBS) 1 h before or after intranasal challenge with 100 TCID 50 HCoV-OC43 (in 4 µL PBS).In detail, 1 h before (for testing prophylactic effect) or 1 h after (for testing therapeutic effect) HCoV-OC43 challenge, a single dose of 10 mg/kg IBP-EK1 or EK1 (in 4 µL PBS) was given to newborn mice by alternately dropping into their bilateral nostrils through a metallic syringe with a blunt needle.HCoV-OC43 challenge was carried out in a biosafety cabinet, where 4 µL of HCoV-OC43 diluent (with a viral load of 100 TCID 50 ) was slowly dropped into a unilateral nostril of each mouse through a metallic syringe with a blunt needle.Mice in the viral control group were intranasally administered with 4 µL of PBS 1 h before or after viral challenge.
In each group, five mice were randomly selected for euthanasia on day 5 after challenge, among which four mice were assessed for viral titer in mouse brain, as described below, and one mouse was assessed for brain histopathologic examination [46].The survival and body weights of the remaining mice in each group were monitored for the subsequent 14 days.

Circular Dichroism Spectroscopic Analysis
As previously described [45], individual peptides were dissolved in phosphate buffer to prepare a solution with a final concentration of 10 µM.Peptide mixtures were also dissolved in phosphate buffer to 10 µM, respectively, and incubated at 25 • C for 40 min.Their circular dichroism spectra (scanning wavelength range: 200 to 260 nm) were measured on a J-815 spectrometer (JASCO Inc., Tokyo, Japan).To evaluate the thermostability of peptide complexes, thermal denaturation was monitored from 20 to 98 • C at 222 nm with a thermal gradient of 5 • C/min.The midpoint of melting curve, or Tm value, was acquired by JASCO software (J-815) utilities.

Expression and Purification of IgG/Antibody
(1) To express and purify neutralizing antibody, including S309 and 10933, Expi293 cells were cultured in suspension using SMM 293-TII expression medium (Sino Biological Inc., Beijing, China) at 37 • C in a 5% CO 2 incubator rotating at 120 rpm.With a density of 1 × 10 6 cells/mL, the cultures per 50 mL were cotransfected with 30 µg of heavy chain and 30 µg of light chain-encoding plasmids using 180 µL EZ Trans (Life iLab Biotech, Shanghai, China) and cultured for 6 days.Then, cells and cellular debris were removed by centrifugation at 3000× g rpm, 4 • C for 25 min, followed by filtration through a 0.45 µm filter.Clarified cell supernatant containing antibodies was shaken with and thus bound to the equilibrated rProtein G resin (Smart-Lifesciences Biotechnology Ltd., Changzhou, China) at 4 • C for about 8 h.The resin was extensively washed with PBS and eluted with IgG elution buffer (0.1 M Glycine, pH 2.9) and neutralization buffer (1 M Tris-HCl, pH 9.0).Purified S309 or 10,933 was ultrafiltrated, concentrated in PBS, and stored at −80 • C.
(2) To purify rhesus monkey IgG from sera, 1 mL of rhesus monkey serum was diluted 50-fold with PBS and filtrated with a 0.45 µm filter, and the equilibrated rProtein G resin was added to the serum diluent.After shaking and binding at 4 • C for about 6 h, the resin was extensively washed with PBS, eluted with IgG elution buffer, and neutralized, as described above.Purified rhesus monkey IgG was stored at 4 • C or −80 • C for a long period.

Measurement of Peptide Binding to IgG
(1) The binding abilities of peptides to human immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) or rhesus monkey IgG (purified from sera of rhesus monkeys) were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), as described elsewhere [47].A 5 µg/mL solution of IBP, EK1, and IBP-EK1 was coated on wells of a 96-well ELISA plate at 4 • C overnight.After blockage for 2 h at 37 • C, serially diluted solutions of human (or rhesus monkey) IgG were added to the peptide-coated plate, incubated at 37 • C for 1 h, and washed 3 times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (0.05% PBST).Then, goat antihuman IgG-HRP (1:4000 dilution) was added to each well, incubated at 37 • C for another 1 h, and washed 5 times.Afterwards, the bound IgG-HRP was detected by addition of HRP substrate TMB, and the reaction was terminated by H 2 SO 4 (1 M).Absorbance at 450 nm (OD 450 ) was measured using the Multimode Reader (Tecan, Maennedorf, Switzerland).Each sample was tested in triplicate, and data are presented as means ± SD.
(2) The binding affinities of peptides to human IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or rhesus monkey IgG (purified from sera of rhesus monkeys, as described in 2.7) were determined by biolayer interferometry (BLI).IgG was diluted with 0.02% PBST to a concentration of 10 µg/mL, and 5 µM of peptide was 4-fold serially diluted with 0.02% PBST.AHC biosensors (Forte Biosciences Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) were hydrated in ddH 2 O and equilibrated in 0.02% PBST for 300 s, and IgG (10 µg/mL) was loaded to the biosensors.The sensors were then immersed in graded peptide solutions (0-5 µM) for 300 s prior to dissociation in 0.02% PBST buffer for another 300 s at 30 • C and 1000 rpm with shaking on an Octet RED instrument (Forte Biosciences Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) to measure the association rate constants (Kon) and dissociation rate constants (Koff) for the complex between peptide and IgG.Global curve fitting was performed using a 1:1 binding model and the For-teBio software (Data Analysis 8.1) to obtain the equilibrium dissociation constant (K D ).All experiments were repeated twice, and the result shown was representative of all.

Evaluation of Tolerance to Proteolytic Enzymes
Assays for the stability of peptides to proteolytic enzymes, including proteinase K and trypsin, were performed as previously described [44].For trypsin tests, 10 µM peptide was incubated with 25 µg/mL trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA) at 37 • C, and samples under different incubation times (0, 10, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min) were collected.The sample was immediately added with FBS (10% v/v) to neutralize the proteolytic activity of trypsin, followed by inactivating trypsin at 56 • C for 30 min.Then, supernatants were absorbed and stored at −80 • C before testing.For proteinase K tests, 10 µM peptide was incubated with 100 µg/mL proteinase K (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 • C, and samples under different incubation times (0, 10, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 420 min) were collected and centrifuged (10,000× g rpm, 2 min, 4 • C) immediately.The supernatant was absorbed and stored at −80 • C before testing.The residual antiviral activity of each sample was detected by PsV inhibition assay as described above.

In Vivo Safety Assay
As previously described, female ICR mice (7-week-old) were assigned randomly to three groups (n = 3), respectively, administered with PBS, 50 mg/kg IBP-EK1 intranasally and 50 mg/kg IBP-EK1 intraperitoneally every day for 5 days.Bodyweight changes were monitored over the following 14 days.Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and creatinine (CRE) in the sera of each group were measured using the ALT and creatinine assay kits (NJJCBIO, Nanjing, China) before the first administration and 1, 3, and 5 days after the final administration.The titer of antibodies to IBP-EK1 in the sera of each group was evaluated by ELISA 14 days after the final administration.Twenty-eight days after administration, mice in each group were euthanized to harvest the lungs, livers, and kidneys for hematoxylin and eosin staining.

Pharmacokinetic Studies in Rhesus Monkeys
(1) Rhesus monkeys were raised at Beijing Vafory Biotechnology Co., Ltd., which also performed peptide administration and blood collection.Briefly, rhesus monkeys were administered intravenously with a single dose of 10 mg/kg IBP-EK1 (n = 2) or EK1 (n = 2).Serial blood samples were collected from monkeys that received IBP-EK1 or EK1 before injection and at 2, 4, 6, 24, 72, and 144 h post injection.The samples were then centrifuged at 3000× g rpm, 4 • C for 10 min, and sera were aliquoted and kept frozen until analysis.
(2) As described previously, concentrations of the active peptide in sera can be estimated by detecting the ex vivo antiviral activities of the treated sera [48,49].Briefly, the ex vivo anti-HCoV (SARS-CoV, as an example) activities of IBP-EK1-treated or EK1-treated sera from rhesus monkeys were first detected.Then, dilution folds of sera causing 50% inhibition of SARS-CoV PsV infection (DF-IC 50 s) were calculated.Based on the in vitro IC 50 against SARS-CoV PsV and DF-IC 50 values calculated herein, concentrations of IBP-EK1 or EK1 in the sera were estimated, and their half-lives and other pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using MODFIT software (V6.5), as previously described [50].
(3) High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) can be used to accurately determine the concentrations of IBP-EK1 or EK1 in sera and their half-lives.Briefly, we generated a standard curve of IBP-EK1 or EK1, respectively.To accomplish this, a working solution of 10 µg/mL IBP-EK1 (or EK1) was prepared with methanol, and standard solutions of 2500, 1000, 500, 250, 100, and 50 ng/mL peptide were prepared, respectively, with 50% acetonitrile solution.The standard solutions were then sent into ultraperformance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-TOF-MS; SCIEX Inc., Framingham, MA, USA) for detection with the mobile phase A of liquid chromatography being pure water and mobile phase B being acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid.Afterwards, we measured the IBP-EK1-treated (or EK1-treated) sera from rhesus monkeys.Serum samples were diluted 10-fold and injected into UPLC-Q-TOF-MS for detection.According to its standard curve, IBP-EK1 (or EK1) concentrations in serum samples at different time points after administration were calculated.Then, the serum half-life and other pharmacokinetic parameters of IBP-EK1 (or EK1) were fit by MODFIT software (V6.5), as described above.

Detection of Synergistic Antiviral Effect of IBP-EK1 in Combination with Neutralizing Antibodies
To evaluate the potential synergistic effect, neutralizing antibody and IBP-EK1 were mixed at the indicated molar concentration ratio, whereas neutralizing antibody alone and IBP-EK1 alone were also included as controls.The samples were serially diluted and tested for their inhibitory activities on SARS-CoV-2 PsV infection, as described in Section 2.11.The data were analyzed for synergistic effect by calculating the combination index (CI) with CalcuSyn software (Copyright 2006), kindly provided by Dr. T. C. Chou [51,52].As described previously, CI values of <0.95 and >1.05 indicate synergism and antagonism, respectively.CI values of <0.1, 0.1-0.3,0.3-0.7,0.7-0.85,and 0.85-0.90indicate very strong synergism, strong synergism, synergism, moderate synergism, and slight synergism, re-spectively [51].The fold of dose reduction was calculated according to concentrations of inhibitors tested alone and in combination.

Detection of Ex Vivo Synergistic Effect of IBP-EK1 in Combination with Neutralizing Antibodies
The ex vivo anti-HCoV (SARS-CoV-2, as an example) activities of mice sera treated with the peptide or neutralizing antibody or their combination were detected, as described previously [47,53].Briefly, female BALB/c mice (8-week-old) were intraperitoneally administered with 20 mg/kg S309, 5 mg/kg S309, 15 mg/kg IBP-EK1, S309 (5 mg/kg)/IBP-EK1 (15 mg/kg) in combination, or PBS (as a control), respectively.Sera were collected from these mice at 2 and 8 h post injection and tested for their inhibitory activities against SARS-CoV-2 PsV infection, as described above, and dilution folds of sera causing 50% inhibition (DF-IC 50 ) were calculated to determine the ex vivo synergistic effect of IBP-EK1 in combination with S309.

Design and Identification of IBP-Conjugated Peptides
Several short peptides were reported to specifically bind to human IgG [41].Among them, IBP (Fc-III) showed explicit binding sites and relatively high binding affinity, mainly to the C H 2 and C H 3 interface of the human IgG Fc region (Figure 1a) [43].To take advantage of this IBP-specific property, we designed and synthesized four peptides by conjugating IBP to the N-or C-terminus of EK1 with or without a linker (sequence: GGS) between IBP and EK1, i.e., IBP-EK1, EK1-IBP, IBP-L-EK1, and EK1-L-IBP, respectively (Figure 1b).

IBP-EK1 Showed Potent Inhibitory Activities against SARS-CoV-2 Variants
Inhibitory activities of most neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants, especially the Omicron sublineages, were reported to decrease [22].To investigate whether multiple mutations in the spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2 variants could affect the inhibitory activities of IBP-EK1, we tested its efficacy on a variety of SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped variants.
As shown in Figure 2a-d     We further tested the inhibitory effect of IBP-EK1 on authentic SARS-CoV-2 (represented by Delta variant) proliferation.Through one-step real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay, absolute quantification of viral RNA copies in different samples was carried out according to their Ct values, and, thus, the inhibition of IBP-EK1 at different concentrations against the Delta variant was calculated.As shown in Figure 2e, IBP-EK1 could block the proliferation of live Delta variant in a dose-dependent manner with an IC 50 value of 204 nM.All these results indicate that IBP-EK1 exhibited broadly inhibitory activities against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants.

IBP-EK1 Exhibited Broadly Inhibitory Activities against HCoVs In Vitro
To further investigate the breadth and potency of IBP-EK1 against other HCoVs, we first evaluated the effect of peptides on CoV S protein-mediated cell-cell fusion.Although some CoVs are not identified as HCoVs, they have been proven to be infectious to human cells.Therefore, we chose WIV1-CoV, belonging to SL-CoVs [12,13], to evaluate together with HCoVs.As shown in Figure 3a-f and Table 2, S protein-mediated cell-cell fusion of SARS-CoV, WIV1-CoV, MERS-CoV, and HCoV-OC43, belonging to β-CoVs, could be effectively blocked by IBP-EK1 with IC 50 values ranging from 229 to 829 nM, which is more potent than EK1.For HCoV-NL63 and HCoV-229E, belonging to α-CoVs, IBP-EK1 also exerted strong inhibitory effects on their cell-cell fusion with IC 50 values of 212 and 478 nM, respectively, which is also stronger than EK1.We then evaluated the effect of peptides on PsV infection of the CoVs described above.As shown in Figure 3j-o and Table 2, IBP-EK1 could also effectively inhibit the infection of pseudotyped CoVs on Caco-2 cells with IC 50 values ranging from 522 to 6047 nM.Interestingly, as demonstrated in Figure 3g-i, against the same HCoVs, IBP-EK1 showed significantly stronger inhibitory activities on Calu-3 cells than those on Caco-2 cells with IC 50 values against SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and HCoV-NL63 PsV of 18, 76, and 440 nM, respectively.Further, we tested the in vitro inhibitory activities of IBP-EK1 against live HCoV infection.We amplified HCoVs with obvious CPE effects on target cells, including HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-229E.The inhibitory effects of IBP-EK1 on these two HCoVs were measured by CCK8 assay with IC 50 values of 744 nM and 4139 nM, respectively (Figure 3p,q and Table 2).Hence, consistent with results of cell-cell fusion and PsV infection, IBP-EK1 inhibited the proliferation of live HCoVs efficiently.All IC 50 s of IBP alone exceeded 50 µM, showing no obvious inhibitory activity in any cell-cell fusion, PsV, or live virus infection experiments.
For a variety of CoVs, these results show that IBP-EK1 exhibited broad and potent in vitro inhibitory activities (Table 2).

Intranasal Administration of IBP-EK1 Strongly Protected Mice against HCoV-OC43 Challenge
In order to further investigate the clinical potential of IBP-EK1, we studied the in vivo protective effect of IBP-EK1 against HCoV infection.It has been reported that HCoV-OC43 can infect susceptible mice with viral attack on neurons, causing chronic encephalitis, disability, and even death [55].Therefore, we evaluated the in vivo prophylactic and therapeutic effects of IBP-EK1 through challenging newborn mice with live HCoV-OC43.
First, we studied the prophylactic effect of IBP-EK1 against HCoV-OC43 infection in newborn mice.Suckling mice were administered intranasally with a single dose of 10 mg/kg IBP-EK1 or EK1, followed by challenge with HCoV-OC43 (100 TCID 50 ) one hour later.As demonstrated in Figure 4a,b, mice in the viral control group exhibited twitching limbs, unsteadiness, weight loss, and even death.Mortality reached 100% on the 6th day after challenge.For the IBP-EK1 or EK1 prophylactic group, 100% protection was achieved (Figure 4a).On the 5th day post challenge, the brain tissues of mice were separated to extract RNA, and relative quantification was carried out.Compared with the viral control group, results show that viral loads of the IBP-EK1 or EK1 prophylactic group were very low, with a statistically significant difference (Figure 4c).
We then evaluated the therapeutic effect of IBP-EK1 against HCoV-OC43 infection in newborn mice.One hour after HCoV-OC43 challenge (100 TCID 50 ), suckling mice were given 10 mg/kg IBP-EK1 or EK1 via the intranasal route, and their survival rates and weights were monitored in the following days.Mice in the viral control group showed obvious weight loss 4 days after challenge, and their mortality reached 100% 6 days after challenge.In contrast, mice in IBP-EK1 therapeutic group achieved 80% protection, significantly different from that of the viral control group (Figure 4d,e).Consistently, viral loads of the IBP-EK1 or EK1 therapeutic group were significantly different from those of viral control group, suggesting that HCoV-OC43 infection could be effectively inhibited (Figure 4f).
In addition, the brain tissues of mice were analyzed from prepared sections, and H&E staining was performed.In contrast to brain tissues of the viral control group with such structural abnormalities as degeneration, vacuolation, and inflammatory infiltration, no apparent histopathological changes were observed in either the IBP-EK1 prophylactic or therapeutic group (Figure S2), further suggesting that IBP-EK1 affords potent in vivo efficacy to prevent and treat HCoV infection.
after challenge.For the IBP-EK1 or EK1 prophylactic group, 100% protection was achieved (Figure 4a).On the 5th day post challenge, the brain tissues of mice were separated to extract RNA, and relative quantification was carried out.Compared with the viral control group, results show that viral loads of the IBP-EK1 or EK1 prophylactic group were very low, with a statistically significant difference (Figure 4c).We then evaluated the therapeutic effect of IBP-EK1 against HCoV-OC43 infection in newborn mice.One hour after HCoV-OC43 challenge (100 TCID50), suckling mice were given 10 mg/kg IBP-EK1 or EK1 via the intranasal route, and their survival rates and weights were monitored in the following days.Mice in the viral control group showed obvious weight loss 4 days after challenge, and their mortality reached 100% 6 days after challenge.In contrast, mice in IBP-EK1 therapeutic group achieved 80% protection, significantly different from that of the viral control group (Figure 4d,e).Consistently, viral loads of the IBP-EK1 or EK1 therapeutic group were significantly different from those of viral control group, suggesting that HCoV-OC43 infection could be effectively inhibited (Figure 4f).
In addition, the brain tissues of mice were analyzed from prepared sections, and H&E staining was performed.In contrast to brain tissues of the viral control group with such structural abnormalities as degeneration, vacuolation, and inflammatory infiltration, no apparent histopathological changes were observed in either the IBP-EK1 prophylactic or therapeutic group (Figure S2), further suggesting that IBP-EK1 affords potent in vivo efficacy to prevent and treat HCoV infection.

Influences of IBP Conjugation on the Original Properties of Peptides
We confirmed that IBP-EK1 exhibited inhibitory activities as broad and potent as those of EK1 in vitro and in vivo.Further, by means of circular dichroism (CD) and

Influences of IBP Conjugation on the Original Properties of Peptides
We confirmed that IBP-EK1 exhibited inhibitory activities as broad and potent as those of EK1 in vitro and in vivo.Further, by means of circular dichroism (CD) and biolayer interferometry (BLI), we explored the effects of IBP conjugation on the original properties and functions of peptides.
To explore whether IBP conjugation could affect the structure of EK1, we determined the secondary structure of IBP-EK1 through CD spectra.As shown in Figure 5a, IBP-EK1 displayed double negative peaks at 208 and 222 nm, typical of α-helix in the CD spectrum and similar to that of EK1.As expected, IBP itself had no α-helical feature.This result demonstrates that the two peptides had similar α-helical characteristics, indicating that IBP conjugation to N-terminus of EK1 did not change its original conformation.
Next, we continued to determine whether IBP conjugation would affect the mechanism of action of EK1.For many type I enveloped viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, it is well known that the formation of the 6-HB fusion core is a key step for fusion of viral envelope with the target cell membrane and viral entry.As mentioned above, EK1, which is derived from the HR2 region of HCoV-OC43, interacts with the HR1 region in the fusion process and thus blocks the formation of 6-HB between HR1 and HR2 trimer.With EK1 as the positive control, IBP-EK1 was incubated with an equal molar concentration of HR1P (a peptide derived from the HR1 region; SARS-CoV-2 HR1P, as an example) at 25 • C for 40 min, and CD spectra of EK1/HR1P and IBP-EK1/HR1P mixtures were measured, respectively.As shown in Figure 5b, the EK1/HR1P mixture exhibited significantly deeper double negative peaks at 208 and 222 nm, typical of 6-HB in the CD spectrum, indicating that the interaction between EK1 and HR1P formed a complex with high α-helix content, i.e., heterogeneous 6-HB.Compared with IBP-EK1 alone, the IBP-EK1/HR1P mixture exhibited significantly deeper double negative peaks, similar to those of the EK1/HR1P mixture.These results indicate that like EK1 and other HR2P peptides, IBP-EK1 can also interact with HR1P to form heterogeneous 6-HB, suggesting that IBP-EK1 adopts the same mechanism of action as EK1 by targeting the conserved HR1 region to combat CoV infection.
biolayer interferometry (BLI), we explored the effects of IBP conjugation on the original properties and functions of peptides.
To explore whether IBP conjugation could affect the structure of EK1, we determined the secondary structure of IBP-EK1 through CD spectra.As shown in Figure 5a, IBP-EK1 displayed double negative peaks at 208 and 222 nm, typical of α-helix in the CD spectrum and similar to that of EK1.As expected, IBP itself had no α-helical feature.This result demonstrates that the two peptides had similar α-helical characteristics, indicating that IBP conjugation to N-terminus of EK1 did not change its original conformation.Next, we continued to determine whether IBP conjugation would affect the mechanism of action of EK1.For many type I enveloped viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, it is well known that the formation of the 6-HB fusion core is a key step for fusion of viral envelope with the target cell membrane and viral entry.As mentioned above, EK1, which is derived from the HR2 region of HCoV-OC43, interacts with the HR1 region in the fusion process and thus blocks the formation of 6-HB between HR1 and HR2 trimer.With EK1 as the positive control, IBP-EK1 was incubated with an equal molar concentration of HR1P (a peptide derived from the HR1 region; SARS-CoV-2 HR1P, as an example) at 25 °C for 40 min, and CD spectra of EK1/HR1P and IBP-EK1/HR1P mixtures were measured, respectively.As shown in Figure 5b, the EK1/HR1P mixture exhibited significantly deeper double negative peaks at 208 and 222 nm, typical of 6-HB in the CD spectrum, indicating that the interaction between EK1 and HR1P formed a complex with high α-helix content, i.e., heterogeneous 6-HB.Compared with IBP-EK1 alone, the IBP-EK1/HR1P mixture exhibited significantly deeper double negative peaks, similar to those of the EK1/HR1P To further study thermostability of the complex formed by EK1 or IBP-EK1 with HR1P, we detected the changes in their CD spectra at 222 nm as temperature increased.As shown in Figure 5c, with the temperature increasing gradually, the signal of CD was weakened, indicating that 6-HB structures of the complexes were gradually denatured and dissociated, eventually tending toward a relatively stable value.Then, the midpoint temperatures of melting curves, namely melting temperatures (Tm), were obtained through the analysis software in the instrument.Results show that the 6-HB structure formed between IBP-EK1 and HR1P had higher Tm, indicating better thermostability.These results suggest that IBP-EK1 may inhibit HCoV infection more efficiently than EK1 by forming a more stable heterogeneous 6-HB with the HR1 trimer.
Previous studies have shown that IBP can specifically bind to the Fc domain of human IgG.To investigate whether IBP conjugation with EK1 would affect the binding of IBP to IgG Fc, we detected the binding of IBP-EK1 to human IgG by ELISA.As shown in Figure 5d, the absorbance (OD 450 ) of IBP-EK1 at 450 nm was positively correlated with the concentration of human IgG, showing that IBP-EK1 could indeed bind to human IgG and significantly more strongly than IBP itself.In order to clarify the binding of IBP-EK1 to IgG more directly, BLI was used to determine the binding affinity of IBP-EK1 with human IgG.The Kon and Koff between IBP-EK1 or IBP and human IgG were measured, and their ratio (Koff/Kon) is the equilibrium dissociation constant K D (Table S3).As shown in Figure 5e,f, IBP-EK1 displayed higher binding affinity to hIgG (K D = 2.17 × 10 −7 M) than that of IBP itself (K D = 1.03 × 10 −6 M), being about 3.6-fold more potent.
It has been reported that high homology exists between rhesus monkey and the human IgG Fc domain [56,57].Through sequence alignment, we found that IBP-binding sites (residues 252-254 and 433-435) at C H 2 and C H 3 interface of human IgG Fc were identical to those of rhesus monkey IgG (Figure S3a).Therefore, we also detected the binding of IBP-EK1 to rhesus monkey IgG.As shown in Figure S4 and Table S3, the binding of IBP-EK1 to monkey IgG was also obviously enhanced compared with that of IBP alone.In sum, these collective results show that the conjugation between IBP and EK1 had no obvious negative effects on the original structure and inhibitory mechanism of EK1 but rather improved the intrinsic ability of IBP to bind IgG.

IBP-EK1 Displayed Extended In Vivo Half-Life
As described above, IBP-EK1 can bind specifically to human and rhesus monkey IgG [56,57].We thus adopted rhesus monkey as the model to evaluate its in vivo half-life.Rhesus monkeys were administered a single dose of 10 mg/kg IBP-EK1 or EK1 intravenously.Then, blood samples were collected, and sera were separated at different time points (Figure 6a).High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) has become an important detection technique in the field of drug residue analysis in recent years by integrating efficient separation and multicomponent analysis.Therefore, in order to accurately determine the in vivo half-life of IBP-EK1 or EK1, we quantified their concentrations in sera via HPLC-MS/MS.Serially diluted peptide solutions were first measured to draw their standard curve, respectively, and serum samples were then detected to obtain IBP-EK1 or EK1 concentrations in sera at different time points post injection (Figure 6b and Figure S3b).In addition, as reported through Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis, a high correlation exists between drug concentration and ex vivo anti-HIV-1 activity of sera from lipopeptide-administered rats [48,49].To estimate IBP-EK1 or EK1 concentrations in rhesus monkey sera, we first tested the ex vivo inhibitory activities of sera against SARS-CoV PsV infection at different time points, followed by calculating dilution folds causing 50% inhibition of SARS-CoV PsV infection (DF-IC 50 s) (Figure 6c).According to the results, serum samples from rhesus monkeys treated with IBP-EK1 reached inhibition peak at 2 h post injection (about 1300-fold of its IC 50 ) and maintained high inhibitory activities for 24 h post injection (over 750-fold of its IC 50 ), while those of EK1-treated group decreased quickly (below 450-fold of its IC 50 after 6 h post injection).Based on their in vitro IC 50 values and ex vivo anti-SARS-CoV activities, we estimated the concentrations of active inhibitor in sera of rhesus monkey collected at different time points post injection, respectively (Figure 6c).The serum half-lives of IBP-EK1 or EK1 were also calculated using MODFIT software [50] (Figure 6d).The corresponding half-life of IBP-EK1 was 39.7 h, about 21-fold longer than that of EK1 (t 1/2 = 1.77 h) (Table 3), consistent with the reported value (t 1/2 = 1.8 h) [32].These results suggest the half-lives of IBP-EK1 calculated by these two methods were similar and that conjugation of IBP to N-terminus of EK1 could significantly extend the in vivo half-life of EK1.centrations of active inhibitor in sera of rhesus monkey collected at different time poin post injection, respectively (Figure 6c).The serum half-lives of IBP-EK1 or EK1 were al calculated using MODFIT software [50] (Figure 6d).The corresponding half-life of IB EK1 was 39.7 h, about 21-fold longer than that of EK1 (t1/2 = 1.77 h) (Table 3), consiste with the reported value (t1/2 = 1.8 h) [32].These results suggest the half-lives of IBP-EK calculated by these two methods were similar and that conjugation of IBP to N-termin of EK1 could significantly extend the in vivo half-life of EK1.

IBP-EK1 Showed Good In Vivo Safety
Safety is an important indicator for drug development and clinical application.To evaluate the in vitro safety of IBP-EK1, we tested the cytotoxicity of peptides on different target cells by CCK8 assay.As shown in Figure 7a-d, IBP-EK1 had no detectable adverse effects on cell viability, even at concentrations up to 100 µM; that is, CC 50 was more than 100 µM.The corresponding selectivity index (SI = CC 50 /IC 50 ) of IBP-EK1 was greater than 100.
We further evaluated the in vivo safety of IBP-EK1.Fifty mg/kg IBP-EK1 was given daily to ICR mice for 5 days by intranasal administration or intraperitoneal injection, and weight changes were recorded for the following 2 weeks.As shown in Figure 7e, mice in the two IBP-EK1-treated groups survived normally with weight changes similar to those of the PBS-treated group.Blood samples were collected on the 1st day before administration and the 1st, 3rd, and 5th days after the last administration, respectively, to measure ALT and creatinine levels in mice sera.At all the indicated time points, ALT (Figure 7f) and creatinine (Figure 7g) levels in the mice sera of the IBP-EK1-treated groups were in the normal range, as well as those in the control (PBS) group.Four weeks after the last administration, mouse organs, including lungs, livers, and kidneys, in each group were collected for histopathological assessment.Compared with the PBS-treated group, IBP-EK1-treated mice showed no cytopathic, necrotic, or inflammatory infiltration, i.e., no pathological abnormalities in their organs (Figure 7i), indicating that IBP-EK1 affords a good in vivo safety profile.Additionally, no IBP-EK1-specific antibodies were detected in mice sera 2 weeks after the last intranasal administration or intraperitoneal injection (Figure 7h), indicating that IBP-EK1 possesses low-immunogenicity advantage, portending its successful clinical application in the future.

IBP-EK1 Showed Good In Vivo Safety
Safety is an important indicator for drug development and clinical application.To evaluate the in vitro safety of IBP-EK1, we tested the cytotoxicity of peptides on different target cells by CCK8 assay.As shown in Figure 7a-d, IBP-EK1 had no detectable adverse effects on cell viability, even at concentrations up to 100 µM; that is, CC50 was more than 100 µM.The corresponding selectivity index (SI = CC50/IC50) of IBP-EK1 was greater than 100.

IBP-EK1 Synergized with Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting RBD to Robustly Inhibit CoVs In Vitro and Ex Vivo
Since most developed monoclonal neutralizing antibodies belong to IgG isotype, IBP-EK1 can also bind to these neutralizing antibodies.After confirming the extended half-life of IBP-EK1 in rhesus monkeys, we further investigated synergistic antiviral effects of IBP-EK1 in combination with neutralizing antibodies targeting RBD.Based on the binding epitopes, neutralizing antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 RBD can be divided into four classes [58,59].Here, we selected two representative antibodies from different classes to combine with IBP-EK1 (Table S1): REGN10933, a class 1 antibody targeting the receptorbinding motif (RBM) in RBD, as one component of Regeneron's cocktail therapy [60], and S309, a class 3 antibody targeting RBD (non-RBM), which was developed cooperatively by GSK and Vir technology [61].S309, identified from memory B cells of individuals infected with SARS-CoV, effectively neutralizes a variety of sarbecoviruses, including SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV, by recognizing highly conserved epitopes among the sarbecovirus subgenus [61] (Table S1).
As reported before and described above, neutralizing antibodies targeting the S1 subunit may block viral membrane fusion by inhibiting S protein rearrangement [62], while IBP-EK1 blocks viral membrane fusion by interacting with the HR1 region on the S2 subunit.To investigate the synergistic effects of IBP-EK1 and neutralizing antibody, as represented by S309, we detected the inhibitory activities of S309 alone, IBP-EK1 alone, and S309/IBP-EK1 in combination against SARS-CoV-2 S-mediated cell-cell fusion, respectively, and found potent synergistic effect between S309 and IBP-EK1 with the combination index (CI) causing 50% fusion-inhibition of 0.23, and dose reductions in S309 and IBP-EK1 were 11.3-and 7.1-fold, respectively (Figure 8a and Table S2).
Consistently, on pseudotyped infection models of SARS-CoV, WIV1-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, IBP-EK1 in combination with S309 showed strong synergistic effects with CI values inhibiting 50% PsV infection, ranging from 0.10 to 0.24, which significantly improved the IC 50 value of S309, ranging from 8-to 24-fold (Figure 8 and Table 4).In order to investigate whether IBP-EK1 has universal synergistic effects with antibodies targeting RBD, we then evaluated the synergistic effect of IBP-EK1 and 10,933 against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants.As expected, IBP-EK1/10933 also showed significant synergism (Figure 8 and Table 4), suggesting that IBP-EK1 could broadly synergize with neutralizing antibodies targeting diverse epitopes of RBD.Consistently, on pseudotyped infection models of SARS-CoV, WIV1-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, IBP-EK1 in combination with S309 showed strong synergistic effects with CI values inhibiting 50% PsV infection, ranging from 0.10 to 0.24, which significantly improved the IC50 value of S309, ranging from 8-to 24-fold (Figure 8 and Table 4).In order to investigate whether IBP-EK1 has universal synergistic effects with antibodies targeting RBD, we then evaluated the synergistic effect of IBP-EK1 and 10,933 against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants.As expected, IBP-EK1/10933 also showed significant synergism (Figure 8 and Table 4), suggesting that IBP-EK1 could broadly synergize with neutralizing antibodies targeting diverse epitopes of RBD.To explore the possible in vivo synergistic effect of IBP-EK1 in combination with neutralizing antibodies, we evaluated the ex vivo anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities of mouse sera administered with IBP-EK1 in combination with S309.According to their in vitro IC 50 values against SARS-CoV-2 PsV, as described above, the appropriate molar concentration ratio between IBP-EK1 and S309 is about 3:1.Mice were administered intraperitoneally with 20 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg S309 alone, 15 mg/kg IBP-EK1 alone, and S309 (5 mg/kg)/IBP-EK1 (15 mg/kg), respectively, and mouse sera were collected 2 h and 8 h later.Then, inhibitory activities against SARS-CoV-2 PsV of mouse sera from different groups were tested, and dilution folds causing 50% inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 PsV infection (DF-IC 50 s) were calculated.As demonstrated in Figure 9a, 2 h after administration, sera from the combined S309/IBP-EK1 group (DF-IC 50 = 656) showed significantly higher inhibition when compared with sera from the S309 (5 mg/kg) group (DF-IC 50 = 189) and IBP-EK1 (15 mg/kg) group (DF-IC 50 = 73), as well as sera from the high-dose S309 (20 mg/kg) group (DF-IC 50 = 777).Similarly, 8 h after administration, no significant difference was observed between the inhibitory activities of sera from the S309 (20 mg/kg) group (DF-IC 50 = 690) and the combined S309/IBP-EK1 group (DF-IC 50 = 550), which still showed significantly stronger inhibition compared with sera from the S309 (5 mg/kg) group (DF-IC 50 = 185) and IBP-EK1 (15 mg/kg) group (DF-IC 50 = 44) (Figure 9b).These results show that IBP-EK1 combined with S309 had an effective ex vivo synergistic antiviral effect, which compensated for the decreased activities caused by lower concentrations of S309 or IBP-EK1.The results also imply that the combination of IBP-EK1 with neutralizing antibodies can be expected to synergize during in vivo circulation.

Discussion
The application of anti-HCoV fusion inhibitory peptides is limited by their rapid clearance and short half-life in vivo.Although various long-acting strategies have been widely used, most strategies may interfere with the original functions of peptides [39].To solve this problem, we selected IBP (Fc-III) with low molecular weight, simple structure, and nonbacterial origin to modify fusion inhibitory peptides.In fact, IgG-binding peptides (IgGBPs) are a class of peptides targeting IgG (primarily its Fc domain) [63].In ad-

Discussion
The application of anti-HCoV fusion inhibitory peptides is limited by their rapid clearance and short half-life in vivo.Although various long-acting strategies have been widely used, most strategies may interfere with the original functions of peptides [39].To solve this problem, we selected IBP (Fc-III) with low molecular weight, simple structure, and nonbacterial origin to modify fusion inhibitory peptides.In fact, IgG-binding peptides (IgGBPs) are a class of peptides targeting IgG (primarily its Fc domain) [63].In addition to the IBP (Fc-III) adopted in this study, a number of studies have also screened out short peptides targeting different sites of the IgG Fc domain.These short peptides are characterized by low toxicity, high stability, low cost, and selectable affinity [41], such as linear hexapeptides targeting the Fc C H 3 region (HWRGWV [64], HYFKFD [65], and HFRRHL [66]) or octopeptides targeting the Fc C H 2/C H 3 interface (FYWHCLDE [67], FYCHWALE [68]).Fc-III-derived cyclic peptidomimetic FcBP-2 [69] and bicyclic derivative Fc-III-4C [70] were subsequently reported with improved binding affinity for the IgG Fc domain, thus enabling the development of a variety of long-acting strategies for peptide drugs.Nevertheless, further optimization of IgGBP affinity for Fc C H 2/C H 3 interface, or generation and utilization of ligands with high affinity to other binding sites on IgG Fc, deserves in-depth investigation.
In this study, we developed an IBP-conjugated fusion inhibitor, IBP-EK1, which effectively inhibited in vitro PsV infection of SARS-CoV-2 variants and showed dosedependent inhibition of authentic Delta variant proliferation.IBP-EK1 also showed broadly inhibitory activities against cell-cell fusion and PsV infection mediated by the S protein of divergent HCoVs and replication of live HCoVs.Furthermore, IBP-EK1 exhibited in vivo prophylactic and therapeutic effects against HCoV-OC43 infection in newborn mice.Subsequently, our results indicate that IBP conjugation did not affect the structure or inhibitory mechanism of EK1.Of note, IBP conjugation with EK1 significantly improved the binding and affinity of IBP to human or monkey IgG and substantially prolonged the serum half-life of EK1 in vivo.In addition, IBP-EK1 combination with monoclonal neutralizing antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 RBD exhibited robust synergistic antiviral effects, both in vitro and ex vivo, significantly reducing doses of IBP-EK1 and antibodies.
The application of peptide fusion inhibitors is often limited by their physicochemical properties, such as molecular weight, charge/hydrophobicity, and in vivo stability [33].HCoVs are mostly transmitted through respiratory infections, and viral load in the respiratory tract was found to be associated with the disease severity of COVID-19 patients [71,72].Peptide inhibitors administered intranasally can block the HCoV entry process as the first step of viral invasion, making these inhibitors promising for clinical application.Although intranasal administration can avoid renal filtration and hepatic first-pass effect, diverse enzymes in the nasal mucosa, such as aminopeptidases and proteases, impact the in vivo stability of peptide drugs [73].Studies have shown that cyclic peptides have relatively restricted conformations with reduced protease recognition and higher stability in vivo [74].Since IBP itself appears cyclic, we studied the effect of IBP conjugation on in vivo stability of EK1 and tested the tolerance of EK1 to protease hydrolysis.Results demonstrate that samples of IBP-EK1 treated with trypsin (Figure S5a) or proteinase K (Figure S5b) had significantly better inhibitory activities than those of EK1 against SARS-CoV-2 PsV infection at different incubation time points, indicating that IBP conjugation could improve the original tolerance of EK1 to protease hydrolysis.This result suggests that IBP-EK1 may display better in vivo stability in environments with proteases.
As described above, IBP conformation is somewhat restrictive [74], and conjugation with EK1 increases its original hydrophilicity and stability (Table S3).Hence, IBP-EK1 may fit the C H 2/C H 3 interface of the IgG Fc domain more appropriately.This explains why IBP-EK1 dissociation from IgG is more problematic when compared with IBP, since the Koff value of IBP-EK1 is lower and its affinity is higher when compared with IBP alone (Table S4).For further investigation and confirmation, the crystal structure of IBP-EK1 in complex with IgG will be analyzed in future studies.
Since SARS-CoV-2 presents as a systemic, multitissue, and organ-specific infection in patients [75], neutralizing antibodies administered by intravenous infusion can effectively reduce the in vivo viral titer and avoid excessive immune response, such as cytokine storm, during the period of transition between quiescent and proliferating states of adaptive immune response [76,77].Besides, for some severe patients unable to generate an effective adaptive immune response, neutralizing antibody therapies are also expected to play a therapeutic role [78], especially with extended half-life through Fc-silencing technologies [79].However, the high cost of such therapies limits their use, especially against Omicron subvariants able to effectively evade immunity.
Compared with the expression and purification of monoclonal antibodies, the production of peptides is simpler and faster, with a lower cost.As demonstrated above, IBP-EK1, which is derived from IBP (Fc-III) conjugation, increases its apparent molecular weight by binding to IgG in serum, thereby extending its half-life in vivo.Therefore, IBP-EK1, a long-acting, broad-spectrum HCoV fusion inhibitory peptide, can be administered via intravenous infusion, similar to that of therapeutic neutralizing antibodies.It has been reported that most neutralizing monoclonal antibodies need to be administered in combination to reduce doses and limit the emergence of drug-resistant variants, and their isotype is mainly IgG.Therefore, the combination of IBP-EK1 with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, such as S309, targeting conserved sites on RBD is expected to circulate in vivo and interact with each other to generate a synergistic effect over a prolonged half-life [80], thus reducing doses of antibodies and peptides, as well as therapeutic costs.
Based on the K D values obtained and concentrations adopted in this study, we can theoretically deduce the feasible synergism between IBP-EK1 and S309, whereby their combined effect is greater than the sum of their separate effects in vivo, as follows.According to the results of the BLI assay, the binding affinity of IBP-EK1 to human IgG is about 200 nM, which is sufficient for their in vivo interaction.We liken this interaction to physiological receptor-ligand affinity, such as, for example, that between PD-1 and PD-L1 with 112~526 nM affinity [81].Furthermore, the concentration of IBP-EK1 in rhesus monkey sera 24 h after 10 mg/kg administration was about 24 µg/mL, i.e., 4 µM, which theoretically meets the dose required for combination therapy.Supposing S309 is dosed at 5 mg/kg, an adult needs about 300 to 400 mg of the antibody, consistent with the dosages of currently used neutralizing antibody drugs; and in the case of slow attenuation, its serum concentration may be about 0.4 µM (with human blood volume estimated about 4 L) 24 h after 5 mg/kg administration.Therefore, if S309 (5 mg/kg) and IBP-EK1 (15 mg/kg) are dosed in combination, they may act synergistically to block the CoV entry process during a certain period of time after administration.
Recently, broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) targeting conserved sites on HCoV S2 subunit have been identified, such as 76E1 targeting fusion peptide (FP) and S2P6 targeting stem helix (SH) [82,83].The synergistic effect of combining IBP-EK1 with these bNAbs targeting the HCoV S2 subunit could be further explored to provide a reserve for newly emerging or re-emerging CoV outbreaks in the future.

Conclusions
In conclusion, our study focused on the long-acting strategy of IBP conjugation to extend in vivo half-lives of CoV peptide fusion inhibitors, as represented by EK1.Our results demonstrate that the strategy of IBP conjugation at N-terminus of EK1 could maintain, or even improve, the anti-HCoV activities of EK1, significantly extending its original in vivo half-life and generating effective synergism with neutralizing antibodies.The results also suggest that IBP-EK1 could be administered via the intranasal route or intravenous infusion (in combination with neutralizing antibodies) for development into a long-acting, broad-spectrum CoV peptide fusion inhibitor.In addition to EK1 mentioned here, this long-acting strategy based on IBP conjugation could also be generalized to fusion (entry) inhibitory peptides against other type I enveloped viruses, such as HIV-1 [47].

Figure 1 .Figure 1 .
Figure 1.IBP conjugation as a strategy intended to prolong the half-life of HCoV peptide fusion inhibitors: (a) Schematic diagram of IBP-EK1 in complex with IgG Fc region and the interaction between IBP and Fc CH2/CH3 interface (PDB: 1DN2, presented by PyMOL).Critical residues of Fc CH2/CH3 interface binding to IBP are shown in boxes labeled pink on the interaction diagram and purple for IBP.CH2 and CH3 interact with IBP through M252, I253, and S254 and H433, N434, and H435, respectively.(b) Schematic diagram of HCoV S2 subunit composition (SARS-CoV-2, as an

Figure 3 .Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Broadly inhibitory activities of IBP-EK1 against cell-cell fusion mediated by S protein and PsV infection of different genera of CoVs and live HCoV replication: (a-f) Inhibitory activities of

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Biophysical properties of IBP-EK1: (a) Circular dichroism (CD) spectra for IBP, EK1, and IBP-EK1 in phosphate buffer (pH = 7.2).(b) CD spectra of the secondary structure of SARS-CoV-2 HR1P in complex with IBP, EK1, or IBP-EK1 in phosphate buffer (pH = 7.2).EK1 and IBP were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.CD spectrum displayed typical double minima at 208 and 222 nm for the α-helical feature.(c) Thermostability of SARS-CoV-2 HR1P in complex with EK1 or IBP-EK1 in phosphate buffer (pH = 7.2).(d-f) Binding of IBP, EK1, and IBP-EK1 to human IgG, as detected by ELISA and BLI.NS, p > 0.05; *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001.In the BLI assay, 10 µg/mL human IgG was immobilized at the surface of Fc biosensors, and then diluted peptide solutions were loaded.A representative example of two independent experiments is shown.Data were analyzed and globally fit with Data Analysis (V8.1).Equilibrium dissociation constants (KD) are reported above the plot.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Biophysical properties of IBP-EK1: (a) Circular dichroism (CD) spectra for IBP, EK1, and IBP-EK1 in phosphate buffer (pH = 7.2).(b) CD spectra of the secondary structure of SARS-CoV-2 HR1P in complex with IBP, EK1, or IBP-EK1 in phosphate buffer (pH = 7.2).EK1 and IBP were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.CD spectrum displayed typical double minima at 208 and 222 nm for the α-helical feature.(c) Thermostability of SARS-CoV-2 HR1P in complex with EK1 or IBP-EK1 in phosphate buffer (pH = 7.2).(d-f) Binding of IBP, EK1, and IBP-EK1 to human IgG, as detected by ELISA and BLI.NS, p > 0.05; *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001.In the BLI assay, 10 µg/mL human IgG was immobilized at the surface of Fc biosensors, and then diluted peptide solutions were loaded.A representative example of two independent experiments is shown.Data were analyzed and globally fit with Data Analysis (V8.1).Equilibrium dissociation constants (K D ) are reported above the plot.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Evaluation of in vitro and in vivo toxicity of IBP-EK1: (a-d) Cytotoxicity of EK1, IBP, and IBP-EK1 to Calu-3 (a), Caco-2 (b), Huh-7 (c), and RD (d) cells.(e) Body weight changes in mice treated with 50 mg/kg IBP-EK1 via intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) or intranasal administration.(f,g) Levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (f) and creatinine (g) in the sera of mice from each group at indicated time points.(h) The titer of specific antibodies (IgG) to IBP-EK1 in the sera of mice 2 weeks post injection or administration.(i) H&E staining analysis of lungs, livers, and kidneys from the treated mice 4 weeks post injection or administration.Scale bar, 100 µm.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Evaluation of in vitro and in vivo toxicity of IBP-EK1: (a-d) Cytotoxicity of EK1, IBP, and IBP-EK1 to Calu-3 (a), Caco-2 (b), Huh-7 (c), and RD (d) cells.(e) Body weight changes in mice treated with 50 mg/kg IBP-EK1 via intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) or intranasal administration.(f,g) Levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (f) and creatinine (g) in the sera of mice from each group at indicated time points.(h) The titer of specific antibodies (IgG) to IBP-EK1 in the sera of mice 2 weeks post injection or administration.(i) H&E staining analysis of lungs, livers, and kidneys from the treated mice 4 weeks post injection or administration.Scale bar, 100 µm.

Variants IC 50 (nM) against Pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 Variants on Caco-2 Cells IC 50 (nM) against Pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 Variants on Calu-3 Cells
NA, not applicable.Each experiment was repeated three times.Colors from red to green correspond to IC 50 values from high to low.

Table 3 .
In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Parameters of IBP-EK1 Measured with Two Methods, Respectively, and Calculated by MODFIT Software.

Table 3 .
In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Parameters of IBP-EK1 Measured with Two Methods, Resp tively, and Calculated by MODFIT Software.

Table 4 .
Combination Index (CI) and Dose Reduction Values of Inhibiting 50% PsV Infection by IBP-EK1 Combination with Neutralizing Antibodies.

-EK1 Combination with Antibody against Sarbecoviruses CI Antibody IBP-EK1 IC 50 (nM) Dose Reduction (n-Fold) IC 50 (nM) Dose Reduction (n-Fold) Alone In Mixture Alone In Mixture
Each experiment was repeated twice.Colors from red to green in each line correspond to CI values from high to low and dose reduction values from low to high, respectively.