Are Uropathogenic Bacteria Living in Multispecies Biofilm Susceptible to Active Plant Ingredient—Asiatic Acid?

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a serious health problem in the human population due to their chronic and recurrent nature. Bacteria causing UTIs form multispecies biofilms being resistant to the activity of the conventionally used antibiotics. Therefore, compounds of plant origin are currently being searched for, which could constitute an alternative strategy to antibiotic therapy. Our study aimed to determine the activity of asiatic acid (AA) against biofilms formed by uropathogenic Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The influence of AA on the survival, biofilm mass formation by bacteria living in mono-, dual-, and triple-species consortia as well as the metabolic activity and bacterial cell morphology were determined. The spectrophotometric methods were used for biofilm mass synthesis and metabolic activity determination. The survival of bacteria was established using the serial dilution assay. The decrease in survival and a weakening of the ability to create biofilms, both single and multi-species, as well as changes in the morphology of bacterial cells were noticed. As AA works best against young biofilms, the use of AA-containing formulations, especially during the initial stages of infection, seems to be reasonable. However, there is a need for further research concerning AA especially regarding its antibacterial mechanisms of action.


Introduction
It is well known that biofilms formed by both commensal and pathogenic bacteria usually do not constitute a mono-species consortium but form multispecies communities of microorganisms. An example of such a multispecies biofilm is the biofilm formed in the urinary tract during its infections. The main cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs) is uropathogenic Escherichia coli, accompanied by other species, including Enterobacter cloacae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Prevention of the formation of such a mixed-species biofilm or its eradication using standard pharmacotherapy is problematic and often associated with failure. Therefore, compounds of plant origin are currently being searched for, which could constitute an alternative strategy to antibiotic therapy or support it in preventing the formation of bacterial biofilm or facilitate its removal.
Asiatic acid (AA; 2α,23-dihydroxyursolic acid) belongs to the pentacyclic triterpenes group, polycyclic compounds classified as secondary plant metabolites. It is a monocarboxylic acid derived from the hydride of a ursane. In the structural formula, ursane is substituted with a carboxyl group at C-28 and hydroxyl groups at C-2, C-3, and C-23 (stereoisomer 2α, 3β) ( Figure 1). The molecular formula can be presented as C30H48O5, the molecular weight of AA is 488.70 g/mol [1,2]. AA can be found in the bark, cork cambium, resin, epidermis, waxy coating on leaves, and flowers of many plant species, where it protects against insect and microbial attack. In the form of asiaticoside and aglycone, large amounts of AA are found in the herb of Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. (Apiaceae), also known as "gotu kola" and "tiger herb". The total fraction of TPs of C. asiatica contains 30% AA, 40% asiaticoside and 30% madecassic acid. C. asiatica can be found in South Africa, Australia, Oceania, and Southeast Asian countries (mainly India and China, but also Japan, Malaysia, and Indonesia). It is used both in the traditional far eastern and modern western phytotherapy due to the wide range of valuable pro-health properties and supporting the treatment of many diseases, especially those with inflammation [3][4][5][6]. The in vitro and in vivo studies so far have confirmed a number of pharmacological properties of AA, which include anti-cancer, hypotensive, cardioprotective, anti-infarction, anti-stroke, antihyperlipidemic, antidiabetic, hepatoprotective, gastroprotective, nephroprotective, diuretic, immunostimulatory, neuroprotective, nootropic, anti-Parkinson's, anti-Alzheimer's, anti-osteoporosis, antimalarial, antifungal, antiviral, anti-photoaging, supporting the treatment of burns and nonhealing diabetic wounds, as well as a spermicidal effect [1,2,[7][8][9][10]. Nowadays, in view of the fact that this plant shows an overall health-promoting effect, in its countries of origin it is consumed prophylactically both in the form of nutraceutical preparations and as an addition to salads and drinks. Moreover, C. asiatica is an ingredient in ointments, cosmetics, and toothpaste [11,12].
However, few literature reports describe the antimicrobial properties of AA. The experiments carried out in recent years have proved that this acid has a significant antibacterial effect when used alone as well as in combination with antibiotics. These studies focused primarily on bacteria living in suspension, i.e., planktonic forms. They included the determination of the MIC value (minimum inhibitory concentration) of the acid, its effect on bacterial survival, cell morphology and integrity of the bacterial membrane, and the impact on bacterial virulence factors such as hydrophobicity of the cell's surface, ability to move, synthesis of curli fimbriae and P-type fimbriae [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Up to date, few studies have investigated the effect of AA on the ability of bacteria to form biofilms, and these studies have mainly concentrated on single-species consortia [21][22][23][24].
The impact of AA on multispecies biofilms has not been described so far. Therefore, our research aimed to determine the effect of AA on the growth dynamics and the number of uropathogenic bacteria living in biofilms. The amount of biofilm mass formed and its structure, cell morphology, and metabolic activity of bacilli living in mono-(E. coli; E. cloacae; P. aeruginosa), dual-(E. coli + E. cloacae; E. coli + P. aeruginosa), and triple-species biofilms (E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa) at various stages of their development (adhesion, maturation, dispersion, and migration) were also established. In the form of asiaticoside and aglycone, large amounts of AA are found in the herb of Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. (Apiaceae), also known as "gotu kola" and "tiger herb". The total fraction of TPs of C. asiatica contains 30% AA, 40% asiaticoside and 30% madecassic acid. C. asiatica can be found in South Africa, Australia, Oceania, and Southeast Asian countries (mainly India and China, but also Japan, Malaysia, and Indonesia). It is used both in the traditional far eastern and modern western phytotherapy due to the wide range of valuable pro-health properties and supporting the treatment of many diseases, especially those with inflammation [3][4][5][6]. The in vitro and in vivo studies so far have confirmed a number of pharmacological properties of AA, which include anti-cancer, hypotensive, cardioprotective, anti-infarction, anti-stroke, antihyperlipidemic, antidiabetic, hepatoprotective, gastroprotective, nephroprotective, diuretic, immunostimulatory, neuroprotective, nootropic, anti-Parkinson's, anti-Alzheimer's, anti-osteoporosis, antimalarial, antifungal, antiviral, anti-photoaging, supporting the treatment of burns and non-healing diabetic wounds, as well as a spermicidal effect [1,2,[7][8][9][10]. Nowadays, in view of the fact that this plant shows an overall health-promoting effect, in its countries of origin it is consumed prophylactically both in the form of nutraceutical preparations and as an addition to salads and drinks. Moreover, C. asiatica is an ingredient in ointments, cosmetics, and toothpaste [11,12].
However, few literature reports describe the antimicrobial properties of AA. The experiments carried out in recent years have proved that this acid has a significant antibacterial effect when used alone as well as in combination with antibiotics. These studies focused primarily on bacteria living in suspension, i.e., planktonic forms. They included the determination of the MIC value (minimum inhibitory concentration) of the acid, its effect on bacterial survival, cell morphology and integrity of the bacterial membrane, and the impact on bacterial virulence factors such as hydrophobicity of the cell's surface, ability to move, synthesis of curli fimbriae and P-type fimbriae [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Up to date, few studies have investigated the effect of AA on the ability of bacteria to form biofilms, and these studies have mainly concentrated on single-species consortia [21][22][23][24].
The impact of AA on multispecies biofilms has not been described so far. Therefore, our research aimed to determine the effect of AA on the growth dynamics and the number of uropathogenic bacteria living in biofilms. The amount of biofilm mass formed and its structure, cell morphology, and metabolic activity of bacilli living in mono-(E. coli; E. cloacae; P. aeruginosa), dual-(E. coli + E. cloacae; E. coli + P. aeruginosa), and triple-species biofilms (E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa) at various stages of their development (adhesion, maturation, dispersion, and migration) were also established.

Bacterial Strains
Three uropathogenic reference strains from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) were used in the study: Escherichia coli CFT073, Enterobacter cloacae ATCC-BAA 2468, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 25000.

Asiatic Acid
Asiatic acid (AA, purity 97%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Poland). Stock AA with a concentration of 4 mg/mL was prepared each time by dissolving the acid in an aqueous DMSO solution. For further experiments, stock AA was diluted with the appropriate culture medium.

MIC (Minimal Inhibitory Concentration) and MBC (Minimal Bactericidal Concentration) Determination
The MIC and MBC values of AA against examined bacterial strains were established using the 2-fold microdilution method according to CLSI [25]. The MIC was the lowest concentration of AA that prevented the visible growth of bacteria in the microtitre plate. The MBC was the lowest concentration of AA that killed bacteria. The MBC value was determined by subculturing bacterial samples to agar plates.

Preparation of the Bacterial Suspension
Strains cultures were grown overnight on TSB (Tripticasein Soy Broth, Biocorp, Poland) at 37 • C. Then, bacteria were transferred to fresh TSB and incubated at 37 • C for 2 h in the shaking water bath (Julabo SW-22, Poland). Following incubation, while bacterial cells were in the log phase of growth, the bacterial suspensions were centrifuged and suspended in PBS to reach the final density of 0.5 McFarland (10 8 CFU/mL). The suspensions prepared in this way were used in the experiments.

The Bacterial Cell Count in Biofilm Cultures
Bacterial survival in biofilm was established after each time of incubation: 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. Biofilm cultures were gently washed to remove cells unattached to the biofilm matrix. The biofilm deposited on the walls of the microtiter plate wells was scraped by hand with a sterile spatula, transferred to microtubes containing PBS, and vortexed for 3 min to disperse the biofilm uniformly [26]. The CFU/mL values were assessed by plating serial dilutions on chromogenic coliform agar (Graso Biotech, Poland).

Determination of the Biofilm Mass by Spectrophotometric Method
Unbound cells were removed from the 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h biofilm cultures by gentle washing three times with sterile PBS. Then, 1% crystal violet (CV) was added to each well and incubated at 37 • C for 15 min in order to penetrate the CV into the structure of the biofilm. The dye was then removed, and 95% ethanol was added to elute the CV from the biofilm matrix. After 15-min incubation at room temperature, the optical density (OD) was measured at a wavelength of 590 nm on a microplate reader (HiPo MPP-96 ® BIOSAN, Poland). On the basis of the OD value, the bacteria were classified into one of the following groups: OD ≤ ODc-non-biofilm producer; ODc < OD ≤ 2 × ODc-weakbiofilm producer; 2 × ODc < OD ≤ 4 × ODc-moderate-biofilm producer; 4 × ODc < OD-strong-biofilm producer. The ODc value was calculated as the sum of the mean OD values for the blank (TSB) and 3 times the standard deviation of the mean OD value for the TSB [27][28][29]. The ODc value was 0.218.

Determination of the Metabolic Activity of Bacteria in a Biofilm
Using the Spectrophotometric Method 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) (10%) was added to 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h biofilm cultures. The metabolically active bacteria reduced TTC to red triphenyl formazan. After 24 h of incubation at 37 • C, plankton cells were removed by washing the biofilm cultures with sterile PBS. Then, 95% ethanol was added to each culture and after 15 min of incubation at room temperature, the amount of produced triphenyl formazan was measured spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 490 nm (HiPo MPP-96 ® BIOSAN, Poland) [30,31].

Effect of AA on Bacterial Cell Morphology
Bacterial biofilms were incubated at 37 • C for 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h with AA at a concentration of 0.5 × MIC. Washed with PBS samples were then Gram-stained and observed under the microscope (Nikon Eclipse 400). The changes in bacterial cell morphology were recorded.

Statistical Analysis
Each experiment was repeated three times (so-called technical repeat); the grown bacterial colonies were counted from 6-8 plates, and the optical density was read from 6 wells of the microtiter plate, which gives a total of 18-24 so-called biological repeats. The final results are average values. The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a Dunn's multiple comparison test were used to analysis of the obtained results. Statistical calculations were made using Statistica 13.3. (Stat Soft, Kraków, Poland). Values of p ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

MICs and MBCs Determination
The susceptibility of bacterial strains to analyzed plant compounds is specified by determining the MIC and MBC values. The MIC and MBC values of AA against the Gram-negative reference strains used in this study were 1536 and 2048 µg/mL for both E. coli CFT073 and P. aeruginosa ATCC25000, as well as 1024 and 1536 µg/mL for E. cloacae ATCC-BAA2468, respectively (Table 1). In our previous study concerning the antimicrobial activity of AA against clinical E. coli strains, it was found that the MIC values of AA were also high, ranging from 512 to >1024 µg/mL [17,18]. The MIC values of AA against P. aeruginosa PAO1, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and E. coli ATCC2 5922 obtained by Garo et al. [23] and Acebey-Castellon et al. [14] were >128 µg/mL. There were significantly lower MIC and MBC values of AA against E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella typhimurium DT104, and P. aeruginosa and they were 20-40 µg/mL and 32-46 µg/mL, respectively [19]. The differences of MICs of AA for bacteria belonging to the same species may be due to the different origins (sources). Strains used in the current study are classified as uropathogenic. According to the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), E. coli CFT073 has been isolated from blood and urine from a woman with acute pyelonephritis and P. aeruginosa ATCC 2500-from the urine of a catheterized patient. Garo et al. [23] used P. aeruginosa PAO1 from an infected wound; Acebey-Castellon et al. [14] used E. coli ATCC 25922 clinical isolate of unknown origin and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 isolated from blood culture. Liu et al. [19] tested enterohemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7 being a major foodborne pathogen and P. aeruginosa isolated from products of animal origin. Moreover, the differences in MICs of AA obtained by us and those of other researchers may be caused by different methods used to determine them. In our study the microdilution method was used, other researchers used the disc diffusion method.
Several studies have also determined the effect of AA on Gram-positive strains. As a rule, MIC and MBC values of AA against strains that belong to this group are lower compared to Gram-negative strains. Liu et al. [19] determined the susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Bacillus cereus to AA. The MIC and MBC values ranged between 18-44 µg/mL and 28-56 µg/mL, respectively. Even lower MIC values of AA, 10-20 µg/mL, were obtained by Harnvoravongchai et al. [22] against Clostridium difficile strains. However, it should be noted that the MIC values of AA against Gram-positive strains are not always as low as in above-mentioned studies. According to our other previous studies [21], those values against clinical E. faecalis strains were 64-128 µg/mL. Comparable results were obtained by Acebey-Castellon et al. [14] against S. aureus ATCC25923 (MIC > 128 µg/mL) and E. faecalis ATCC29212 (MIC = 128 µg/mL). According to studies conducted on S. aureus strains, the MIC and MBC values of AA ranged between 20-160 µg/mL [32].
When comparing the antibacterial activity of different compounds against Gramnegative and Gram-positive strains, it can be observed that the MIC values are generally higher against the former. This is related to differences in terms of the structure of cell envelopes of these two groups of bacteria. The outer membrane is a significant structure found in Gram-negative bacteria, which has a specific chemical structure that impedes the penetration of antibacterial compounds into the cell. It should be noted that bacteria that belong to the same group (Gram-positive/Gram-negative), or even to the same species, may differ significantly in their susceptibility to the same antibacterial compounds, resulting in different MIC values. The reason for these differences should also be found in various sources of microbes (clinical, environmental, or reference strains) and their individual characteristics.

The E. coli Cell Count in Mono-, Dual-, and Triple-Species Biofilms Untreated with AA
Comparing the number of live E. coli cells in mono-species biofilm and dual-species consortia (E. coli + E. cloacae and E. coli + P. aeruginosa), it was found that the presence of either E. cloacae or P. aeruginosa in the bacterial cultures limited the growth of E. coli rods ( Figure 2).
This may indicate antagonistic interactions between bacteria. However, statistically significant inhibition of E. coli growth (p ≤ 0.05) was noted in the E. coli + E. cloacae biofilm only in 6 and 24 h cultures. When comparing the viable E. coli cells count in the monospecies biofilm and in the dual-species consortium co-created with P. aeruginosa, it was found that the presence of P. aeruginosa significantly limited the growth of E. coli rods at all stages of biofilm formation (p ≤ 0.05) except for the young 6 h culture. The data contained in Figure 2 also show that the simultaneous presence of E. cloacae and P. aeruginosa in the triple-species biofilm (E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa) significantly limited the E. coli growth at all stages of its formation compared to the number of E. coli cells growing in mono-species biofilm as well as dual-species biofilm co-created with E. cloacae (p ≤ 0.05). The reduction in E. coli growth in the triple-species consortium compared to the number of these rods in the dual-species biofilm co-created with P. aeruginosa was noticed only in 24 and 48 h samples (p ≤ 0.05). Biomolecules 2021, 11, x 6 of 26 This may indicate antagonistic interactions between bacteria. However, statistically significant inhibition of E. coli growth (p ≤ 0.05) was noted in the E. coli + E. cloacae biofilm only in 6 and 24 h cultures. When comparing the viable E. coli cells count in the monospecies biofilm and in the dual-species consortium co-created with P. aeruginosa, it was found that the presence of P. aeruginosa significantly limited the growth of E. coli rods at all stages of biofilm formation (p ≤ 0.05) except for the young 6 h culture. The data contained in Figure 2 also show that the simultaneous presence of E. cloacae and P. aeruginosa in the triple-species biofilm (E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa) significantly limited the E. coli growth at all stages of its formation compared to the number of E. coli cells growing in mono-species biofilm as well as dual-species biofilm co-created with E. cloacae (p ≤ 0.05). The reduction in E. coli growth in the triple-species consortium compared to the number of these rods in the dual-species biofilm co-created with P. aeruginosa was noticed only in 24 and 48 h samples (p ≤ 0.05).

The E. cloacae Cell Count in Mono-, Dual-and Triple-Species Biofilms Untreated with AA
Comparing the number of living E. cloacae cells in a single-species biofilm with their number in dual-species (E. coli + E. cloacae) and triple-species (E. cloacae + E. coli + P. aeruginosa) biofilms, a statistically significant reduction in E. cloacae cells count was found in both multispecies biofilms at all stages of their development (p ≤ 0.05). Such a result may be due to the antagonistic interactions between bacteria ( Figure 3). Statistically significant differences in the number of E. cloacae cells were noted in 24 and 48 h dual-species biofilms compared to triple-species biofilms (p ≤ 0.05). Survival ×10 Figure 4, the number of live P. aeruginosa cells in the dual-species biofilm (P. aeruginosa + E. coli) compared to the monoculture was significantly lower in the young 6 and 24 h biofilms and the oldest 96 h culture (p ≤ 0.05). In contrast, the P. aeruginosa cells count in the 48 and 72 h dual-species biofilms significantly increased in comparison with the number of these cells noticed in the monoculture (p ≤ 0.05). Figure 3. The survival of E. cloacae rods in mono-, dual-, and triple-species biofilms. Statistically significant differences were noted with an asterisk (* p ≤ 0.05).

The P. aeruginosa Cell Count in Mono-, Dual-and Triple-Species Biofilms Untreated with AA
As shown in Figure 4, the number of live P. aeruginosa cells in the dual-species biofilm (P. aeruginosa + E. coli) compared to the monoculture was significantly lower in the young 6 and 24 h biofilms and the oldest 96 h culture (p ≤ 0.05). In contrast, the P. aeruginosa cells count in the 48 and 72 h dual-species biofilms significantly increased in comparison with the number of these cells noticed in the monoculture (p ≤ 0.05). A very similar relationship was observed between single-and triple-species biofilms. Interestingly, the presence of the other bacterial species did not disturb the growth of P. aeruginosa, on the contrary, the P. aeruginosa rods grew better in mixed consortia than in the monoculture ( Figure 4).  A very similar relationship was observed between single-and triple-species biofilms. Interestingly, the presence of the other bacterial species did not disturb the growth of P. aeruginosa, on the contrary, the P. aeruginosa rods grew better in mixed consortia than in the monoculture ( Figure 4).
The results obtained concerning bacterial survival indicate that single-species biofilms have higher cell counts for individual bacterial species than dual-and triple-species biofilms. This indicates the presence of mutually antagonistic interactions between microbial strains living in mixed biofilms. The growth of E. coli in dual-species consortia was limited by the presence of E. cloacae and P. aeruginosa; P. aeruginosa showed stronger antagonism to E. coli. It should be noted that E. coli cell counts were lowest when the bacilli grew in a triple-species biofilm. Similarly, the presence of E. coli significantly reduced the growth of E. cloacae. In contrast, P. aeruginosa growth was limited by the presence of E. coli only in young biofilms. The antagonism noted between P. aeruginosa and E. coli is reflected in observations made by other researchers. Machado et al. [33] analyzed 6-day single-and dual-species biofilms composed of P. aeruginosa ATCC10145 and E. coli K12MG1655. In single-species biofilms, the number of cells for each strain was higher compared to the dualspecies consortium. According to Vanysacker et al. [34], biofilms formed on microfiltration membrane surfaces by E. coli LMG 2092T and P. aeruginosa PA14, the number of cells for each strain was higher in single-species consortia compared to the dual-species biofilm. Based on the above-mentioned results, it can be concluded that E. coli and P. aeruginosa interact antagonistically. Cerqueira et al. [35] obtained slightly different results. They observed that E. coli cell counts in single-species biofilms were higher and P. aeruginosa cell counts were lower than when these strains formed a common dual-species consortium. P. aeruginosa, however, outnumbered E. coli only after 48 h of collective growth. Kuznetsova et al. [36] evaluated the survival of the E. coli strain and different strains of P. aeruginosa in monocultures and in mixed dual-species cultures. Three strains of P. aeruginosa were used in that study: reference strain ATCC 27853, clinical strain BALG (strong-biofilm producer), and clinical strain 9-3 (weak-biofilm producer). E. coli cell counts decreased only in 6 h mixed biofilms formed with both clinical strains of P. aeruginosa. However, E. coli cell counts were the same in the presence of the P. aeruginosa reference strain. The survival rate of the ATCC 27853 strain also remained unchanged in the presence of E. coli. In contrast, there was also a decrease in the number of the other two clinical strains of P. aeruginosa in dual-species consortia; as early as 6 h of incubation for the strain that was a weak-biofilm producer and as late as 12 h for the strain that was a strong biofilm producer. Two other research teams observed a lack of antagonistic relationships in dual-species biofilms formed by E. coli and P. aeruginosa. Oliveira et al. [37] noted that in single-species biofilms formed on polystyrene surfaces by E. coli CECT434 and P. aeruginosa PAO1, the number of cells for each strain was lower compared to dual-species biofilms. Solis-Velasquez et al. [38] also showed that E. coli ATCC 11229 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 15442 cell counts in the dual-species biofilm were higher than cell counts for individual strains growing in monocultures.
As is well known, the phenomenon of "quorum sensing" (QS) is one of the main factors that are significant during biofilm formation. QS helps bacteria not only regulate the number of cells within their own species, but also influence the number of bacteria of another species living in the same consortium. Mirani et al. [39] observed that in a common mixed culture of P. aeruginosa and E. coli, the number of cells for each species varied according to the stage of biofilm formation. In a young, 24 h consortium, E. coli was numerically superior to P. aeruginosa. However, the situation was reversed in the case of an older, 48 h biofilm. Only P. aeruginosa strains producing cis-2-decenoic acid (CDA) had antagonistic effects on E. coli. CDA belongs to a group of diffusible molecules that are involved in interspecies signaling and they modulate the behavior of other microbes. Interestingly, CDA molecules also had the ability to disperse the formed E. coli biofilm. Additionally, it was found that P. aeruginosa produced more CDA when cultured in a biofilm mixed with E. coli [40]. Rahmani-Badi et al. [41] observed that pure CDA was also capable of inhibiting the production of single-and dual-species biofilms formed by E. coli ATCC 25922 and K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603. The pure CDA also caused the dispersion of biofilms already formed by these bacterial species. In addition to CDA production, P. aeruginosa secretes significant amounts of extracellular rhamnolipids (RHL) and signaling molecules, including N-acyl-L-homoserine lactone (AHL) involved in QS. P. aeruginosa bacilli living in mixed biofilms use RHL to disperse the biofilm matrix, facilitating their access to iron and oxygen, for which they compete with other microbes. With AHL molecules activating P. aeruginosa bacilli to intense divisions, this species numerically dominates in mixed biofilms [40,42]. Cao et al. [43] found that P. aeruginosa PAO1C growing as colonies secreted signalling molecules of alkyl quinolones (AQ) in response to the presence of E. coli DH5α colonies. Interestingly, the appearance of AQ at the periphery of E. coli colonies occurred well before the physical fusion of colonies of these two bacterial species. It is clear that varied species of bacteria living together interact with each other. As indicated by Bhattacharjee et al. [44], more intense growth of P. aeruginosa in mixed biofilms formed together with E. coli is associated not only with QS but also with the topography of a surface on which the biofilm grows. The prevalence of P. aeruginosa occurs only when the culture is cultivated on a flat surface. During biofilm growth on undulating surfaces, E. coli bacilli are less likely to disperse. This phenomenon is related to the production of indole by E. coli cells, which reduces the dispersive response of these bacilli to signalling compounds secreted by P. aeruginosa. Moreover, indole was found to play a significant role in the survival of E. coli in a mixed biofilm by inhibiting the production of pyocyanin and other AHL-regulated virulence factors of P. aeruginosa [45].
The importance of extracellular metabolites in the interactions between P. aeruginosa and E. coli is supported by Lopes et al.'s study [46]. The authors determined the effect of supernatants containing metabolites of planktonic forms and biofilm forms of P. aeruginosa ATCC 10145 on the growth of both planktonic forms and biofilm forms of E. coli K12MG1655 and vice versa. It was found that the supernatant extracted from planktonic forms of E. coli stimulated biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa bacilli, however, it did not affect their survival. In contrast, the supernatant obtained from the planktonic culture of P. aeruginosa did not affect either biofilm production by E. coli or the survival of these bacilli. Lopes et al. [46] also showed that metabolites found in the aeruginosa bacilli to intense divisions, this species numerically dominates in mixed biofilms [40,42]. Cao et al. [43] found that P. aeruginosa PAO1C growing as colonies secreted signaling molecules of alkyl quinolones (AQ) in response to the presence of E. coli DH5α colonies. Interestingly, the appearance of AQ at the periphery of E. coli colonies occurred well before the physical fusion of colonies of these two bacterial species. It is clear that varied species of bacteria living together interact with each other. As indicated by Bhattacharjee et al. [44], more intense growth of P. aeruginosa in mixed biofilms formed together with E. coli is associated not only with QS but also with the topography of a surface on which the biofilm grows. The prevalence of P. aeruginosa occurs only when the culture is cultivated on a flat surface. During biofilm growth on undulating surfaces, E. coli bacilli are less likely to disperse. This phenomenon is related to the production of indole by E. coli cells, which reduces the dispersive response of these bacilli to signaling compounds secreted by P. aeruginosa. Moreover, indole was found to play a significant role in the survival of E. coli in a mixed biofilm by inhibiting supernatant obtained from P. aeruginosa biofilm culture strongly stimulated the growth of planktonic forms, however, they inhibited the formation of biofilm formed by E. coli. They also significantly reduced the survival rate of E. coli. Metabolites found in the supernatant obtained from E. coli biofilm culture did not affect either the growth of planktonic forms or biofilm mass formation by P. aeruginosa. However, they decreased the survival rate of P. aeruginosa in the biofilm. Castonguay et al. [47] conducted a study focusing on mixed biofilm formation by E. coli PHL565 and Pseudomonas putida MT2. It should be noted that these strains differed in terms of their adhesive capabilities. The former strain was non-adherent and thus incapable of forming a biofilm, while the latter one showed extraordinarily strong adhesive properties and formed a thin biofilm even on glass surfaces. Interestingly, in a mixed culture, E. coli PHL565 bacilli were able to adhere to surfaces and they formed a biofilm together with P. putida.

Formation of Biofilm Mass by Uropathogenic Rods in Mono-, Dual-and Triple-Species Biofilms Untreated with AA
The amount of biofilm mass created by individual species of bacteria allowed to differentiate them into weak, moderate, or strong biofilm producers. Depending on the optical density (OD) value, the strains were classified into one of 4 groups: OD 590 ≤ 0.218-no biofilm, 0.218 < OD 590 ≤ 0.436-weak biofilm, 0.436 < OD 590 ≤ 0.872-moderate biofilm, and OD 590 > 0.872-strong biofilm.
The E. coli strain formed a weak biofilm at all stages of development ( Figure 5). The highest amount of biofilm was recorded in the 6 h culture (OD 590 = 0.406), and the lowest in the 48 h one (OD 590 = 0.261). The E. cloacae strain produced a weak biofilm (0.281 < OD 590 ≤ 0.329) at all stages of its formation except for the 24 h culture in which the mean OD 590 value was 0.574, indicating the average biofilm mass production. The P. aeruginosa strain was the best biofilm producer. It produced a moderate biofilm (0.802 < OD 590 ≤ 0.836) at all stages of biofilm maturation, except for the 6 h culture (OD 590 = 0.370).
As shown in Figure 5, E. coli and E. cloacae grown together in the 24, 48, and 72 h dual-species consortia produced less biofilm mass than when they were grown separately. However, statistical significance was only demonstrated in the 24 h culture (p ≤ 0.05).
An interesting result was obtained for the dual-species biofilm of E. coli + P. aeruginosa in comparison to the mono-species biofilm formed by P. aeruginosa. It is clear that the E. coli rods act antagonistically inhibiting EPS production by P. aeruginosa. The strongest inhibitory effect was observed especially in 24,48, and 72 h cultures where the reduction in biofilm mass was 34%, 51%, and 30%, respectively (p ≤ 0.05) ( Figure 5). Similar results were obtained for the triple-species biofilm of E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa. The greatest reduction in biofilm mass synthesis (52%) was recorded in the 48 h culture in comparison to P. aeruginosa monoculture (p ≤ 0.05) ( Figure 5).

Biofilms Untreated with AA
The amount of biofilm mass created by individual species of bacteria allowed to differentiate them into weak, moderate, or strong biofilm producers. Depending on the optical density (OD) value, the strains were classified into one of 4 groups: OD590 ≤ 0.218no biofilm, 0.218 < OD590 ≤ 0.436-weak biofilm, 0.436 < OD590 ≤ 0.872-moderate biofilm, and OD590 > 0.872-strong biofilm.
The E. coli strain formed a weak biofilm at all stages of development ( Figure 5). The highest amount of biofilm was recorded in the 6 h culture (OD590 = 0.406), and the lowest in the 48 h one (OD590 = 0.261). The E. cloacae strain produced a weak biofilm (0.281 < OD590 ≤ 0.329) at all stages of its formation except for the 24 h culture in which the mean OD590 value was 0.574, indicating the average biofilm mass production. The P. aeruginosa strain was the best biofilm producer. It produced a moderate biofilm (0.802 < OD590 ≤ 0.836) at all stages of biofilm maturation, except for the 6 h culture (OD590 = 0.370). As shown in Figure 5, E. coli and E. cloacae grown together in the 24, 48, and 72 h dualspecies consortia produced less biofilm mass than when they were grown separately. However, statistical significance was only demonstrated in the 24 h culture (p ≤ 0.05).
An interesting result was obtained for the dual-species biofilm of E. coli + P. aeruginosa in comparison to the mono-species biofilm formed by P. aeruginosa. It is clear that the E. coli rods act antagonistically inhibiting EPS production by P. aeruginosa. The strongest inhibitory effect was observed especially in 24,48, and 72 h cultures where the reduction in biofilm mass was 34%, 51%, and 30%, respectively (p ≤ 0.05) ( Figure 5). Similar results were obtained for the triple-species biofilm of E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa. The greatest reduction in biofilm mass synthesis (52%) was recorded in the 48 h culture in comparison to P. aeruginosa monoculture (p ≤ 0.05) ( Figure 5).
According to our study, E. coli and E. cloacae formed weak single-species biofilms, while the P. aeruginosa strain had much stronger biofilm production. Moreover, Wang et al. [48] observed that the clinical strains of P. aeruginosa produced significantly greater biofilm mass than E. coli, E. faecalis, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae, and Klebsiella oxytoca. The present study also found that the amount of produced biofilm mass was usually greater in single-species consortia compared to dual-and triple-species biofilms. biofilm * * * * * * Figure 5. The biofilm mass production by bacteria living in mono-, dual-, and triple-species biofilm consortia. Statistically significant differences were noted with an asterisk (* p ≤ 0.05).
According to our study, E. coli and E. cloacae formed weak single-species biofilms, while the P. aeruginosa strain had much stronger biofilm production. Moreover, Wang et al. [48] observed that the clinical strains of P. aeruginosa produced significantly greater biofilm mass than E. coli, E. faecalis, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae, and Klebsiella oxytoca. The present study also found that the amount of produced biofilm mass was usually greater in single-species consortia compared to dual-and triple-species biofilms. The fact that the amount of biomass produced in mature mixed biofilms was smaller than the amount of biomass produced at the same stage of biofilm formation by each individual species provides evidence of antagonistic interactions between the analyzed bacteria. This was particularly evident in the dual-species biofilm, in which the amount of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) produced by P. aeruginosa was decreased by the presence of E. coli. These findings contradict studies of other research groups [36,[49][50][51]. Qian et al. [49] found that the amount of biofilm mass produced by single-species consortia of E. coli ATCC 25922 and E. cloacae ATCC 13047 was smaller than that in mixed biofilm. Kuznetsova et al. [36] also observed that the amount of biomass in dual-species biofilms composed of E. coli and P. aeruginosa was significantly greater compared to single-species biofilms. Similarly, Liu et al. [50] observed synergism during the formation of dual-species biofilms containing Burkholderia caryophylli and E. coli O157:H7, as well as Ralstonia insidiosa and E. coli O157:H7. Moreover, Culotti et al. [51] observed that the growth and synthesis of biofilm mass produced by E. coli DH5α were more intense when these bacteria grew together with P. aeruginosa PAO1. Interestingly, P. aeruginosa grew only in clusters, whereas E. coli occupied a much larger area, growing as a lawn. On the other hand, Machado et al. [33] found that the amount of biofilm mass formed by P. aeruginosa ATCC 10145 and E. coli K12MG1655 after the 6-day incubation was similar whether the bacteria grew in monocultures or formed a common consortium.

Metabolic Activity of Uropathogenic Rods in Mono-, Dual-and Triple-Species Biofilms Untreated with AA
The results presented in Figure 6 show that the highest metabolic activity was noticed in the 6, 24, and 48 h E. cloacae monocultures as well as in the 96 h monoculture of E. coli. The weaker metabolic activity was exhibited in the single-species P. aeruginosa cultures regardless of the stage of biofilm development. It was also observed that the simultaneous presence of E. coli + E. cloacae and E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa resulted in a reduction in metabolic activity in 24 h cultures compared to the activity of E. cloaceae rods growing in a mono-species consortium (p ≤ 0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that strains are mutually antagonistic. The metabolic activity of bacteria living in the dual-biofilm of E. coli + P. aeruginosa seems to be lower than the activity of E. coli growing in monoculture. In addition, the metabolic activity of bacteria growing in triple-species biofilms in 24, 48, and 96 h cultures was weaker than when these species lived in mono-species consortia, but the results have no statistical significance (p > 0.05).
osa and E. coli O157:H7. Moreover, Culotti et al. [51] observed that the growth and synthesis of biofilm mass produced by E. coli DH5α were more intense when these bacteria grew together with P. aeruginosa PAO1. Interestingly, P. aeruginosa grew only in clusters, whereas E. coli occupied a much larger area, growing as a lawn. On the other hand, Machado et al. [33] found that the amount of biofilm mass formed by P. aeruginosa ATCC 10145 and E. coli K12MG1655 after the 6-day incubation was similar whether the bacteria grew in monocultures or formed a common consortium.

Metabolic Activity of Uropathogenic Rods in Mono-, Dual-and Triple-Species Biofilms Untreated with AA
The results presented in Figure 6 show that the highest metabolic activity was noticed in the 6, 24, and 48 h E. cloacae monocultures as well as in the 96 h monoculture of E. coli. The weaker metabolic activity was exhibited in the single-species P. aeruginosa cultures regardless of the stage of biofilm development. It was also observed that the simultaneous presence of E. coli + E. cloacae and E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa resulted in a reduction in metabolic activity in 24 h cultures compared to the activity of E. cloaceae rods growing in a mono-species consortium (p ≤ 0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that strains are mutually antagonistic. The metabolic activity of bacteria living in the dual-biofilm of E. coli + P. aeruginosa seems to be lower than the activity of E. coli growing in monoculture. In addition, the metabolic activity of bacteria growing in triple-species biofilms in 24, 48, and 96 h cultures was weaker than when these species lived in mono-species consortia, but the results have no statistical significance (p > 0.05).  Figure 6. The metabolic activity of bacteria living in mono-, dual-, and triple-species biofilm consortia. Statistically significant differences were noted with an asterisk (* p ≤ 0.05).
Machado et al. [33] determined the metabolic activity of P. aeruginosa ATCC 10145 and E. coli K12MG1655 strains in 6-day mono-cultured biofilms. In a monoculture, P. aeruginosa had higher metabolic activity than E. coli. This result is contrary to the one obtained in our current study. According to our study, P. aeruginosa had weaker metabolic activity compared to E. coli and E. cloacae. However, this study and Machado et al.'s study [33] found that bacteria growing in mixed consortia had lower metabolic activity than singlespecies consortia.
Interestingly, the present study showed that the amount of formed biofilm mass does not correlate with the metabolic activity of the bacteria. E. cloacae and E. coli strains producing only a weak biofilm had higher metabolic activity than better biofilm-producing P. aeruginosa.
The present study also attempted to determine the effect of AA on survival, biofilm mass production, and metabolic activity of E. coli, E. cloacae, and P. aeruginosa growing in monocultures and in mixed biofilms. The obtained results indicate that AA has an antibacterial effect on bacteria growing in all tested biofilms.

The E. coli Cell Count in Mono-, Dual-, and Triple-Species Biofilms Treated with AA
In mono-species biofilm formed by E. coli ( Figure 7A), regardless of its maturity stage, a statistically significant decrease in the number of viable bacteria under the influence of AA was noted in comparison with the control sample (p ≤ 0.05). The greatest reduction in the number of viable cells (4 log10) occurred after 24 h of incubation. The weakest effect of AA was recorded in the older 72 and 96 h biofilms ( Figure 7A). The data contained in Figure 7B,C show that this acid reduced the number of E. coli also in dual-species biofilms (E. coli + E. cloacae + AA and E. coli + P. aeruginosa + AA) as The data contained in Figure 7B,C show that this acid reduced the number of E. coli also in dual-species biofilms (E. coli + E. cloacae + AA and E. coli + P. aeruginosa + AA) as well as triple-species biofilm (E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa + AA; Figure 7D) compared to the number of E. coli cells grown in the consortia untreated with AA.
Analyzing the effect of AA on the survival of bacteria in a dual-species biofilm (E. coli + P. aeruginosa; Figure 7C), it was noticed that the acid inhibited the growth of E. coli in the 6, 24, and 48 h biofilms and the reduction was 2.6 log10, 2.5 log10, and 0.6 log10, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). No inhibitory effect of AA on the survival of E. coli bacilli was observed only in the mature 72 and 96 h dual-species culture of E. coli + P. aeruginosa + AA.
Comparative analysis of E. coli survival in mono-species biofilm treated with AA with survival of these bacteria in dual-species (E. coli + E. cloacae + AA and E. coli + P. aeruginosa + AA) and triple-species (E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa + AA) biofilms, also in the presence of the AA (Figure 8), showed that the acid was most effective against E. coli living in mono-species biofilm regardless of its stage of development (p ≤ 0.05). On the other hand, E. coli bacilli showed the lowest sensitivity to the action of AA, living in a triple-species consortium (E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa + AA) in 6, 24, and 48 h cultures.
olecules 2021, 11, x 14 o well as triple-species biofilm (E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa + AA; Figure 7D) compar to the number of E. coli cells grown in the consortia untreated with AA Analyzing the effect of AA on the survival of bacteria in a dual-species biofilm coli + P. aeruginosa; Figure 7C), it was noticed that the acid inhibited the growth of E. c in the 6, 24, and 48 h biofilms and the reduction was 2.6 log10, 2.5 log10, and 0.6 log respectively (p ≤ 0.05). No inhibitory effect of AA on the survival of E. coli bacilli was o served only in the mature 72 and 96 h dual-species culture of E. coli + P. aeruginosa + A Comparative analysis of E. coli survival in mono-species biofilm treated with A with survival of these bacteria in dual-species (E. coli + E. cloacae + AA and E. coli + aeruginosa + AA) and triple-species (E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa + AA) biofilms, a in the presence of the AA (Figure 8), showed that the acid was most effective against coli living in mono-species biofilm regardless of its stage of development (p ≤ 0.05). On other hand, E. coli bacilli showed the lowest sensitivity to the action of AA, living in triple-species consortium (E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa + AA) in 6, 24, and 48 h cultur

The E. cloacae Cell Count in Mono-, Dual-, and Triple-Species Biofilms Treated with AA
As shown in Figure 9A, AA significantly reduced the E. cloacae cells count in mon species biofilm at all stages of its development (p ≤ 0.05). The most effective antibacter activity of the acid was recorded in the oldest 96 h biofilm (8.6 log10 reduction). The d in Figure 9 show that AA also significantly reduced the number of E. cloacae cells in bo dual-( Figure 9B) and triple-species biofilm ( Figure 9C) (p ≤ 0.05) at all stages of their d velopment.

The E. cloacae Cell Count in Mono-, Dual-, and Triple-Species Biofilms Treated with AA
As shown in Figure 9A, AA significantly reduced the E. cloacae cells count in monospecies biofilm at all stages of its development (p ≤ 0.05). The most effective antibacterial activity of the acid was recorded in the oldest 96 h biofilm (8.6 log10 reduction). The data in Figure 9 show that AA also significantly reduced the number of E. cloacae cells in both dual-( Figure 9B) and triple-species biofilm ( Figure 9C) (p ≤ 0.05) at all stages of their development. Comparative analysis of the effect of AA on E. cloacae survival in mono-, dual-, and triple-species biofilms ( Figure 10) showed that the acid had the weakest antibacterial effect on the E. cloacae grown a triple-species biofilm. The acid was most effective against E. cloacae living in mono-species biofilm regardless of its stage of development (p ≤ 0.05) with the exception of the young 6 h culture where E. cloacae rods grew much better than in dualas well as triple-species consortia (p ≤ 0.05). Comparative analysis of the effect of AA on E. cloacae survival in mono-, dual-, and triple-species biofilms ( Figure 10) showed that the acid had the weakest antibacterial effect on the E. cloacae grown a triple-species biofilm. The acid was most effective against E. cloacae living in mono-species biofilm regardless of its stage of development (p ≤ 0.05) with the exception of the young 6 h culture where E. cloacae rods grew much better than in dual-as well as triple-species consortia (p ≤ 0.05).

The P. aeruginosa Cell Count in Mono-, Dual-, and Triple-Species Biofilms Treated with AA
The data presented in Figure 11 show that AA significantly reduced the number of viable P. aeruginosa cells in mono-, dual-, and triple-species biofilms compared to the untreated samples at all stages of their development (p ≤ 0.05). The greatest decrease in the P. aeruginosa cells count was recorded in 72 h mono-and triple-species biofilms ( Figure  11C); reduction values were 3.2 log10 and 3.5 log10, respectively. In the dual-species biofilm ( Figure 11B), the AA showed the best bactericidal activity on the P. aeruginosa rods grown in 48 and 72 h cultures with a growth reduction of 3.2 log10. E. cloacae in mono biofilm + AA E.cloacae in dual biofilm with E. coli + AA E.cloacae in triple biofilm with E.coli and P.aeruginosa + AA * * * * * * * Figure 10. Comparison of the E. cloacae rods survival in mono-species biofilm with the survival of E. cloacae rods growing in dual-and triple-species consortia treated with asiatic acid (AA). Statistically significant differences were noted with an asterisk (* p ≤ 0.05).

The P. aeruginosa Cell Count in Mono-, Dual-, and Triple-Species Biofilms Treated with AA
The data presented in Figure 11 show that AA significantly reduced the number of viable P. aeruginosa cells in mono-, dual-, and triple-species biofilms compared to the untreated samples at all stages of their development (p ≤ 0.05). The greatest decrease in the P. aeruginosa cells count was recorded in 72 h mono-and triple-species biofilms ( Figure 11C); reduction values were 3.2 log10 and 3.5 log10, respectively. In the dual-species biofilm ( Figure 11B), the AA showed the best bactericidal activity on the P. aeruginosa rods grown in 48 and 72 h cultures with a growth reduction of 3.2 log10.
Comparing the P. aeruginosa cells count in all AA-treated biofilms (Figure 12), it can be concluded that the acid exhibited the most effective antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa rods growing in the 6, 24, and 96 h triple-biofilm cultures comparing them to mono-species consortia. This situation undoubtedly proves that the presence of additional species in the culture (E. coli and E. cloacae) strongly antagonizes the P. aeruginosa strain. As a result of these interactions, the P. aeruginosa strain becomes more susceptible to AA.
The reduction in the number of viable cells depended on the duration of AA and whether a bacterial strain grew in a single-or multi-species consortium. AA the most reduced bacterial counts in single-species biofilms while slightly less in dual-and triplespecies biofilms (Figures 8 and 10). AA also inhibited EPS synthesis in all tested biofilms. Under the influence of AA, there was also a decrease in the metabolic activity of bacilli living in single-species biofilms at all stages of their formation. Our previous studies determining the effect of AA on both Gram-negative [24], and Gram-positive [21], bacteria, as well as on the formation and eradication of single-species biofilms, showed its antibacterial activity. AA also supported the pharmacological effects of ciprofloxacin when removing mature E. coli biofilm from urinary catheters [24]. Garo et al. [23] investigated the influence of AA on single-species P. aeruginosa biofilm. AA showed antibiofilm activity. Furthermore, it acted synergistically with ciprofloxacin and tobramycin. Bacterial susceptibility to AA may be associated with membrane disintegration. This is confirmed by the results obtained by Liu et al. [19], in which they proved that AA caused membrane damage in both Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli O157:H7, S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa) and Gram-positive ones (L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, E. faecalis, B. cereus). Meanwhile, the results of two other research teams did not prove the antibiofilm effect of AA against Gram-positive bacteria [22,52]. Harnvoravongchai et al. [22] found that AA, even at concentrations several times greater than the MIC value, had no inhibitory effect on biofilm formation by clinical strains of Clostridium difficile. Moreover, Bharitkar et al. [52] observed that AA even at a high concentration of 1250 µg/mL did not inhibit the growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Comparing the P. aeruginosa cells count in all AA-treated biofilms (Figure 12), it can be concluded that the acid exhibited the most effective antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa rods growing in the 6, 24, and 96 h triple-biofilm cultures comparing them to mono-species consortia. This situation undoubtedly proves that the presence of additional species in the culture (E. coli and E. cloacae) strongly antagonizes the P. aeruginosa strain. As a result of these interactions, the P. aeruginosa strain becomes more susceptible to AA. The reduction in the number of viable cells depended on the duration of AA and whether a bacterial strain grew in a single-or multi-species consortium. AA the most reduced bacterial counts in single-species biofilms while slightly less in dual-and triplespecies biofilms (Figures 8 and 10). AA also inhibited EPS synthesis in all tested biofilms. Under the influence of AA, there was also a decrease in the metabolic activity of bacilli living in single-species biofilms at all stages of their formation. Our previous studies determining the effect of AA on both Gram-negative [24], and Gram-positive [21], bacteria, as well as on the formation and eradication of single-species biofilms, showed its antibacterial activity. AA also supported the pharmacological effects of ciprofloxacin when removing mature E. coli biofilm from urinary catheters [24]. Garo et al. [23] investigated the influence of AA on single-species P. aeruginosa biofilm. AA showed antibiofilm activity. Furthermore, it acted synergistically with ciprofloxacin and tobramycin. Bacterial susceptibility to AA may be associated with membrane disintegration. This is confirmed by the results obtained by Liu et al. [19], in which they proved that AA caused membrane damage in both Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli O157:H7, S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa) and Gram-positive ones (L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, E. faecalis, B. cereus). Meanwhile, the results of two other research teams did not prove the antibiofilm effect of AA against Grampositive bacteria [22,52]. Harnvoravongchai et al. [22] found that AA, even at concentrations several times greater than the MIC value, had no inhibitory effect on biofilm formation by clinical strains of Clostridium difficile. Moreover, Bharitkar et al. [52] observed that AA even at a high concentration of 1250 μg/mL did not inhibit the growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus.
The results obtained by other authors indicate that different antibacterial agents show better activity against single-species biofilms than multi-species biofilms. The results of this study, however, are difficult to discuss because they are novel. No research group has investigated the effects of AA on bacteria living in multispecies consortia so far. According to Schwering et al. [53], dual-species biofilms of E. coli and E. cloacae are up to 300 times more resistant to chlorine than single-species biofilms. Furthermore, Qian et al. [49] investigated the effect of luteolin on mixed biofilm formed by E. coli ATCC 25922 and E. cloacae ATCC 13047. Qian et al. [49] found that luteolin had a much weaker effect than The results obtained by other authors indicate that different antibacterial agents show better activity against single-species biofilms than multi-species biofilms. The results of this study, however, are difficult to discuss because they are novel. No research group has investigated the effects of AA on bacteria living in multispecies consortia so far. According to Schwering et al. [53], dual-species biofilms of E. coli and E. cloacae are up to 300 times more resistant to chlorine than single-species biofilms. Furthermore, Qian et al. [49] investigated the effect of luteolin on mixed biofilm formed by E. coli ATCC 25922 and E. cloacae ATCC 13047. Qian et al. [49] found that luteolin had a much weaker effect than when the bacteria were grown in monocultures.

Formation of Biofilm Mass by Uropathogenic Rods in Mono-, Dual-, and Triple-Species Biofilms Treated with AA
The data presented in Figure 13 shows that AA significantly inhibited the synthesis of biofilm formed by the rods growing in mono-species consortia (p ≤ 0.05). The exceptions were the 48 and 72 h E. coli cultures and a 72 h E. cloacae culture (p > 0.05). The most effective anti-biofilm activity of AA was observed in P. aeruginosa cultures. P. aeruginosa strain originally producing moderate biofilm (0.802 < OD 590 ≤ 0.836) became a non-biofilm producer (OD 590 ≤ 0.218).
The results presented in Figure 14 show that AA reduced the amount of biofilm produced by bacteria growing in dual-species E. coli + P. aeruginosa and triple-species E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa biofilms at all stages of their formation (p ≤ 0.05). However, in the dual-species E. coli + E. cloacae consortium, a significant reduction in biofilm mass under the influence of AA was recorded only in 6 and 24 h cultures (p ≤ 0.05). It is worth noting that complete inhibition of biofilm synthesis (OD 590 ≤ 0.218) was noted in all 6 and 24 h dual-and triple-species consortia ( Figure 14).

Biofilms Treated with AA
The data presented in Figure 13 shows that AA significantly inhibited the synthesis of biofilm formed by the rods growing in mono-species consortia (p ≤ 0.05). The exceptions were the 48 and 72 h E. coli cultures and a 72 h E. cloacae culture (p > 0.05). The most effective anti-biofilm activity of AA was observed in P. aeruginosa cultures. P. aeruginosa strain originally producing moderate biofilm (0.802 < OD590 ≤ 0.836) became a non-biofilm producer (OD590 ≤ 0.218). Figure 13. The influence of the asiatic acid (AA) on the biofilm-mass production by bacteria living in mono-species consortia. Statistically significant differences were noted with an asterisk (* p ≤ 0.05).
The results presented in Figure 14 show that AA reduced the amount of biofilm produced by bacteria growing in dual-species E. coli + P. aeruginosa and triple-species E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa biofilms at all stages of their formation (p ≤ 0.05). However, in the dual-species E. coli + E. cloacae consortium, a significant reduction in biofilm mass under the influence of AA was recorded only in 6 and 24 h cultures (p ≤ 0.05). It is worth noting that complete inhibition of biofilm synthesis (OD590 ≤ 0.218) was noted in all 6 and 24 h dual-and triple-species consortia ( Figure 14).

Metabolic Activity of Uropathogenic Rods in Mono-, Dual-, and Triple-Species Biofilms Treated with AA
The results in Figure 15 show that AA reduced the metabolic activity of rods growing in mono-species biofilms. However, statistically significant results were only reported for the 24 and 48 h E. cloacae cultures (p ≤ 0.05). It is worth emphasizing that AA did not reduce the metabolic activity of bacteria living in dual-species or triple-species biofilms (p > 0.05) ( Figure 16). In contrast, the metabolic activity of bacteria growing in the triple-species consortia (24 and 96 h) significantly increased in the presence of AA (p ≤ 0.05).  Figure 14. The influence of the asiatic acid (AA) on the biofilm-mass production by bacteria living in dual-and triple-species consortia. Statistically significant differences were noted with an asterisk (* p ≤ 0.05).

Metabolic Activity of Uropathogenic Rods in Mono-, Dual-, and Triple-Species Biofilms Treated with AA
The results in Figure 15 show that AA reduced the metabolic activity of rods growing in mono-species biofilms. However, statistically significant results were only reported for the 24 and 48 h E. cloacae cultures (p ≤ 0.05). It is worth emphasizing that AA did not reduce the metabolic activity of bacteria living in dual-species or triple-species biofilms (p > 0.05) ( Figure 16). In contrast, the metabolic activity of bacteria growing in the triple-species consortia (24 and 96 h) significantly increased in the presence of AA (p ≤ 0.05).

Treated with AA
The results in Figure 15 show that AA reduced the metabolic activity of rods growing in mono-species biofilms. However, statistically significant results were only reported for the 24 and 48 h E. cloacae cultures (p ≤ 0.05). It is worth emphasizing that AA did not reduce the metabolic activity of bacteria living in dual-species or triple-species biofilms (p > 0.05) ( Figure 16). In contrast, the metabolic activity of bacteria growing in the triple-species consortia (24 and 96 h) significantly increased in the presence of AA (p ≤ 0.05). It is also difficult to discuss the results of our study regarding the effect of AA on the amount of formed biomass and the metabolic activity of bacteria living in biofilm consortia, due to the lack of literature data in this regard. Nostro et al. [54] described changes in the amount of biofilm and metabolic activity of E. coli and S. aureus that form a dual-species consortium under the influence of two plant-derived organic compounds-citronellol and eugenol. Citronellol had a better effect on single-species biofilms. The amount of biofilm mass was smaller and the bacterial metabolic activity was weaker compared to the dual-species consortium. In contrast, eugenol showed better antibiofilm activity on the dual-species consortium.

Effect of AA on Bacterial Morphology
The normal cell length of the investigated strains ranges from 0.8 to 3.0 μm ( Figure  17A). Various morphological changes were noted in AA-treated bacterial cells.  It is also difficult to discuss the results of our study regarding the effect of AA on the amount of formed biomass and the metabolic activity of bacteria living in biofilm consortia, due to the lack of literature data in this regard. Nostro et al. [54] described changes in the amount of biofilm and metabolic activity of E. coli and S. aureus that form a dual-species consortium under the influence of two plant-derived organic compounds-citronellol and eugenol. Citronellol had a better effect on single-species biofilms. The amount of biofilm mass was smaller and the bacterial metabolic activity was weaker compared to the dual-species consortium. In contrast, eugenol showed better antibiofilm activity on the dual-species consortium.

Effect of AA on Bacterial Morphology
The normal cell length of the investigated strains ranges from 0.8 to 3.0 µm ( Figure 17A). Various morphological changes were noted in AA-treated bacterial cells. In young 6 h monocultures of E. coli and E. cloacae short filaments (5-15 µm) were observed. In older biofilms (24-96 h) additionally, long filaments (>15 µm) have been found ( Figure 17B). The so-called "ghost" cells (partially lacking cell wall) were present in single-species mature biofilms of E. coli (48-96 h) and E. cloacae (96 h) ( Figure 17C). No morphological changes were observed in the biofilms formed by P. aeruginosa. Short and long filaments, as well as "ghost" cells, were observed in AA-treated dual-biofilm of E. coli + P. aeruginosa, regardless of its maturation stage ( Figure 17D). In young 6 h dual-biofilms formed by E. coli + E. cloacae and triple-species biofilms (E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa), only short filaments were found, while in older biofilms (24-96 h), additionally long filaments and "ghost" cells were observed ( Figure 17E). Our study showed that in the presence of AA, there were short filaments (5-15 μm) in young 6 h monoculture biofilms formed by E. coli and E. cloacae, and additionally long filaments (>15 μm) in older biofilms (24-96 h). "Ghost" cells were found in single-species mature biofilms of E. coli (48-96 h) and E. cloacae (96 h). On the other hand, no morphological changes were observed in mono-species biofilms formed by P. aeruginosa. In dualspecies biofilms formed by AA-treated E. coli + P. aeruginosa, there were short and long Our study showed that in the presence of AA, there were short filaments (5-15 µm) in young 6 h monoculture biofilms formed by E. coli and E. cloacae, and additionally long filaments (>15 µm) in older biofilms (24-96 h). "Ghost" cells were found in singlespecies mature biofilms of E. coli (48-96 h) and E. cloacae (96 h). On the other hand, no morphological changes were observed in mono-species biofilms formed by P. aeruginosa. In dual-species biofilms formed by AA-treated E. coli + P. aeruginosa, there were short and long filaments and "ghost" cells, regardless of the developmental stage of these biofilms ( Figure 17D). On the other hand, in young 6 h biofilms formed by E. coli + E. cloacae there were only short filaments, while older biofilms (24-96 h) additionally contained long filaments and "ghost" cells. In a triple-species biofilm (E. coli + E. cloacae + P. aeruginosa) the same changes as in the dual-species biofilm formed by E. coli + E. cloacae were observed. In AA-treated biofilm cultures, there were changes in bacterial cellular morphology: short and long filaments and "ghost" cells. Similar changes were observed in microscopic images of E. coli cultures by Wojnicz et al. [17], who additionally found cells that were thickened, and they had intracellular edema. Wojnicz et al. [21] also conducted research concerning the effects of AA on biofilms formed by clinical E. faecalis strains. The cells of these cocci were larger in terms of diameter, and they formed irregular aggregates instead of chains.
It is known that morphological changes of bacterial cells are determined by different mechanisms. Cell filamentation may be caused by impaired synthesis of peptidoglycan that builds the cell wall or impaired formation of division septa. PBP3 (penicillin-binding protein 3) plays an important role in the formation of septa during bacterial cell division. Inhibition of this enzyme's activity causes cell elongation without cell division. Beta-lactam antibiotics, which have an affinity for PBP3, exhibit such division inhibitory activity. They cause filaments formation by E. coli and P. aeruginosa already at low antibiotic concentrations [55,56]. However, this is not the only mechanism that leads to the filamentation of bacterial cells. The filamentation of bacterial cells is also observed due to the inhibition of replication caused by DNA damage or dysfunction of the FtsZ protein, which is a key molecule for bacterial divisions. Delayed septum formation occurs due to inhibition of the FtsZ by the SulA protein. This inhibits the formation of the division ring and causes PBP3 inactivation. Cell filamentation is also observed under the influence of fluoroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin) that contribute to blocking DNA replication by inhibiting gyrase activity [57,58]. It should be noted that both inhibitors of peptidoglycan synthesis and DNA synthesis may result in the creation of "ghost" cells in which partial lysis of the cell wall has occurred [59]. The mechanism of action of AA has yet to be thoroughly understood and described. In our current study, the observed morphological changes in E. coli and E. cloacae cells after exposure to AA confers the assumption that not only does it destroy the cell membrane integrity and cause its dysfunction, but it can also penetrate the bacterial cell and interact with DNA and/or proteins involved in the formation of the division septum. In this way, AA could affect the replication process and interfere with the cell division of the bacterial cell. Therefore, phenotypically altered bacteria may have a loss of ability to adhere to host cells, which consequently reduces their virulence.

Conclusions
The results of this study show significant effects of AA on the survival of bacterial cells, their morphology, ability to form single-, dual-, and triple-species biofilms, and metabolic activity of the cells living in them. However, there is a need for further research concerning AA as a documented bioactive substance, especially regarding its mechanism of action on bacterial cells. It is even more necessary to define principles of validating the antimicrobial activity of AA and principles of relating/converting the potency of its in vitro effect to its in vivo therapeutic effect. AA could then be used as both a complementary agent and adjunctive one for conventional antibiotic therapy applied for chronic UTIs. It could also be a preventive measure for people who are prone to recurrent UTIs. As AA worked best on young biofilms, the use of AA-containing formulations would be reasonable especially during the initial stages of infection.