Next Article in Journal
On the Origin of Sodium Atoms in the Comae and Trails of Comets
Next Article in Special Issue
Geometric Bias and Centrality Dependence of Jet Quenching in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions
Previous Article in Journal
Observational Strategies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Probing Short-Range Nucleon–Nucleon Correlations by Detecting Spectator Neutrons in Collider Experiments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Acceptance Effects on the Extracted Spin Alignment of K*0 Mesons in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions

School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan 467000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Universe 2026, 12(5), 145; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12050145
Submission received: 1 April 2026 / Revised: 8 May 2026 / Accepted: 14 May 2026 / Published: 16 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions: Theory and Observation)

Abstract

The spin alignment of vector mesons, characterized by the spin-density-matrix element ρ 00 , is an important observable for studying spin dynamics in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Experimental measurements have reported deviations of ρ 00 from the isotropic expectation of 1 / 3 , motivating careful evaluation of possible acceptance effects. In this work, we investigate the influence of finite experimental coverage on the extracted ρ 00 of K 0 mesons using a toy model constrained by realistic kinematic distributions from the AMPT model. The reconstructed ρ 00 is examined as a function of pseudorapidity ( η ) and transverse momentum ( p T ) within typical experimental acceptance ranges. We find that limited pseudorapidity coverage can lead to reconstructed ρ 00 values above 1 / 3 , even when the input distribution is isotropic. This behavior originates from the selective removal of decay daughters outside the η window, which modifies the cos θ distribution. A dependence on transverse momentum is also observed, particularly at low p T where daughter particles are more sensitive to longitudinal acceptance constraints. Comparisons with STAR measurements are presented for reference, without attempting to reinterpret the experimental results. Overall, this study provides a systematic examination of acceptance-induced effects and may serve as a useful reference for future measurements of vector-meson spin alignment.

1. Introduction

Understanding the spin degree of freedom of particles produced in relativistic heavy-ion collisions has become a central topic in recent years [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In non-central collisions, the large orbital angular momentum of the system can be partially transferred to the spins of produced particles through spin–orbit coupling, leading to finite spin polarization [7,8]. The connection between the system angular momentum and the global polarization of Λ hyperons was first proposed in theoretical studies and was later supported by experimental measurements from the STAR and ALICE collaborations [9,10,11,12]. The discovery of such polarization phenomena has opened new opportunities for probing the vortical structure, transport properties, and hadronization dynamics of the quark–gluon plasma (QGP) [13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
Vector mesons, particularly the K 0 and ϕ , provide complementary sensitivity to the spin dynamics of the system. Their spin alignment is characterized by the spin-density-matrix element ρ 00 , which represents the population probability of the spin substate with projection m = 0 along a chosen quantization axis. For an unpolarized ensemble, ρ 00 = 1 / 3 is expected, whereas deviations from this value may indicate spin alignment generated during hadronization or modified by hadronic interactions [7,8]. Recent measurements by the STAR and ALICE collaborations have reported small but intriguing deviations of ρ 00 from 1 / 3 for certain vector mesons, together with a pronounced collision-energy dependence [10,12]. These observations have stimulated growing theoretical and experimental interest in clarifying the underlying mechanisms responsible for such effects [20].
Experimentally, the spin-alignment parameter ρ 00 is extracted from the angular distribution of the decay daughters relative to the system angular momentum L in the rest frame of the vector meson. The polar-angle distribution can be expressed as
d N d cos θ ( 1 ρ 00 ) + ( 3 ρ 00 1 ) cos 2 θ ,
where θ denotes the angle between L and the momentum of a daughter particle in the parent-meson rest frame. The vector L is perpendicular to the reaction plane, which is defined by the impact-parameter direction and the beam axis. In practice, ρ 00 is obtained by fitting the measured cos θ distribution with Equation (1).
The spin alignment of spin-1 vector mesons, such as the ϕ and K 0 , provides an important probe of light- and strange-quark polarization. The ϕ meson, predominantly produced at hadronization, receives minimal feed-down contributions compared with Λ and Λ ¯ hyperons. Furthermore, its relatively small hadronic interaction cross section reduces rescattering effects, making it sensitive to early partonic dynamics. In contrast, the K 0 meson undergoes substantial hadronic rescattering due to its short lifetime and strong interaction cross section [21,22,23]. Therefore, measurements of K 0 spin alignment provide access not only to the initial spin alignment but also to the influence of hadronic evolution on the final-state observables [24,25,26,27].
The angular distribution in Equation (1) assumes full phase space coverage and uniform detection efficiency. In realistic experimental conditions, however, detectors have finite pseudorapidity ranges, transverse-momentum thresholds, and species-dependent reconstruction efficiencies. Such limitations can modify the measured angular distribution even when the underlying decays are intrinsically isotropic. Although detailed efficiency and resolution corrections are typically applied in experimental analyses, the impact of kinematic acceptance boundaries themselves is less explicitly quantified. This issue is particularly relevant for K 0 measurements, since its decay daughters, pions and kaons, often populate the low- to intermediate- p T region close to typical detector thresholds. Variations in η and p T selections may preferentially remove daughter particles from specific regions of θ , thereby introducing subtle but non-negligible distortions to the reconstructed distribution. Given that experimentally observed deviations of ρ 00 from 1 / 3 are typically at the percent level, even modest acceptance effects may become comparable in magnitude.
Motivated by these considerations, it is instructive to examine systematically how finite acceptance influences the extraction of ρ 00 within a controlled framework [28]. The purpose of such a study is not to reinterpret existing experimental measurements, but rather to clarify the interplay between kinematic coverage and the reconstruction of spin-alignment observables. A quantitative mapping of how acceptance constraints propagate into the reconstructed ρ 00 can help support high-precision measurements and facilitate more direct comparisons between theoretical expectations and experimental data.
In this work, we employ a simplified toy-model approach to investigate how typical acceptance selections affect the reconstructed K 0 spin-alignment parameter ρ 00 . The model generates K 0 mesons with isotropic decays, ensuring that any deviation of the extracted ρ 00 from 1 / 3 arises solely from acceptance effects. By applying various pseudorapidity and transverse-momentum cuts to the parent mesons and/or daughter particles, we quantify their impact on the reconstructed angular distributions. The resulting trends are compared qualitatively with behaviors reported by the STAR collaboration, highlighting kinematic regions where acceptance-related effects may become relevant. Overall, this study provides a complementary perspective on vector-meson spin alignment and may serve as a reference for future experimental analyses aimed at improving the accuracy and interpretability of ρ 00 measurements in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.
From an experimental perspective, the present study suggests that daughter-particle phase space coverage should be treated as a key ingredient in precision spin-alignment measurements. In particular, narrow pseudorapidity coverage and low- p T tracking requirements can induce sizable distortions in the reconstructed cos θ distribution even when the input decay is isotropic. Future measurements would therefore benefit from systematic checks of the extracted ρ 00 under variations in daughter-track η and p T selections, matched-acceptance comparisons between model calculations and experimental data, and dedicated embedding or detector-response studies to separate acceptance-induced distortions from genuine spin-alignment signals.

2. Spin Density Matrix and the ρ 00 Observable

The spin configuration of a spin-1 vector meson is described by a 3 × 3 Hermitian spin density matrix ρ λ λ , where λ , λ = + 1 , 0 , 1 denote the spin projections along the chosen quantization axis. The diagonal elements represent the population probabilities and satisfy the normalization condition
ρ 11 + ρ 00 + ρ 1 1 = 1 .
For the decay of a vector meson into two pseudoscalar particles, the angular distribution of the decay daughters in the meson rest frame can be expressed within the spin density matrix formalism as [29]
W ( θ , ϕ ) λ , λ ρ λ λ D λ 0 1 ( ϕ , θ , ϕ ) D λ 0 1 ( ϕ , θ , ϕ ) ,
where D λ 0 1 are the Wigner rotation matrix elements for spin-1 vector mesons.
In experimental analyses, the azimuthal angle ϕ is typically integrated over, which eliminates all off-diagonal terms. Using Equation (2), the polar-angle distribution reduces to
W ( cos θ ) = 3 4 ( 1 ρ 00 ) + ( 3 ρ 00 1 ) cos 2 θ ,
which serves as the standard expression for extracting ρ 00 . For an unpolarized ensemble, ρ 00 = 1 / 3 , yielding an isotropic distribution, while deviations from 1 / 3 indicate spin alignment.
Within the spin-density matrix formalism, the parameter ρ 00 represents the population probability of the spin substate with projection m = 0 along the chosen quantization axis, and therefore characterizes the degree of spin alignment of the vector meson. As illustrated in Figure 1, the value ρ 00 = 1 / 3 corresponds to equal population of the three spin substates ( m = 1 , 0 , + 1 ), indicating the absence of any preferred spin orientation. In this limit, the decay angular distribution becomes isotropic in the vector-meson rest frame, leading to a spherical topology in phase space. For ρ 00 > 1 / 3 , the m = 0 spin substate is overpopulated, implying that the vector-meson spin exhibits a preferential alignment along the quantization axis. This results in a quadrupole anisotropy that enhances particle emission at large | cos θ | . The corresponding phase space distribution assumes a prolate ellipsoidal shape, elongated along the quantization axis (beam direction). In contrast, ρ 00 < 1 / 3 reflects an underpopulation of the m = 0 substate and a relative enhancement of the transverse ( m = ± 1 ) spin components. Consequently, the decay distribution develops a quadrupole distortion that suppresses emission along the quantization axis while enhancing it near cos θ 0 . This behavior is associated with an oblate phase space geometry, flattened along the beam direction.

3. The Simulation Method

In heavy-ion collision experiments, phase space coverage is inevitably constrained by the geometric and instrumental limitations of the detector. For instance, the STAR detector at RHIC has a typical charged-particle pseudorapidity acceptance of | η | < 1.5 with the newly installed iTPC, while reconstructed tracks are required to satisfy transverse momentum thresholds of p T > 0.15 GeV/c. Previous studies have shown that such limitations can influence the extraction of spin alignment observables [28]. In particular, the measured ρ 00 of ϕ mesons was found to increase artificially as the η acceptance becomes narrower. This behavior arises because phase space boundaries constrain the accessible θ regions in a nonuniform manner, thereby distorting the reconstructed angular distribution.
The decay kinematics of K 0 mesons differ from those of ϕ mesons. Whereas the ϕ K + K decay is kinematically symmetric, the K 0 K + π (and charge conjugates) decay is intrinsically asymmetric due to the unequal masses of the daughter particles. This asymmetry may further enhance the sensitivity of reconstructed distributions to acceptance selections. To systematically evaluate these effects and to quantify how finite pseudorapidity or transverse momentum cuts may bias extracted ρ 00 of K 0 , we perform a controlled simulation study based on both a multi-phase transport (AMPT) model and a simplified toy model approach.
The primary event generator used in this analysis is the string-melting version of the AMPT model [30]. AMPT provides a realistic dynamical description of relativistic heavy-ion collisions and has been widely applied to these studies of collective flow, particle production, and hadronization at RHIC and LHC energies. The model consists of four main components: (1) fluctuating initial conditions provided by the HIJING model [31], (2) an elastic parton cascade that governs partonic interactions [32], (3) quark coalescence for hadronization, and (4) a hadronic rescattering phase simulated using a relativistic transport (ART) model [33]. The string melting version converts initial strings into partons prior to transport evolution, allowing for a more complete modeling of the early partonic stage and subsequent hadronization dynamics.
To simulate the baseline kinematics of Au+Au collisions, minimum-bias events are generated using the string-melting version of the AMPT model. The impact parameter range is set to (0, 15.6) fm, corresponding to the experimental minimum-bias condition. A hadronic cascade time of 0.6 fm/c is used to suppress late-stage rescattering, so that the K 0 kinematic distributions mainly reflect their early production. In the present analysis, 5.0 × 10 4 minimum-bias Au+Au events at s N N = 54.4 GeV are generated with AMPT. From these events, approximately 3.0 × 10 7 K 0 mesons are obtained and used to construct the parent-meson kinematic probability distributions in p T , η , and ϕ for the toy model. The AMPT sample is used to provide realistic K 0 kinematic distributions in p T , η , and ϕ , while the subsequent decay and acceptance study is performed in the dedicated toy-model framework.
In real experiments, the true reaction plane cannot be directly determined and is usually estimated by the event plane reconstructed from the azimuthal distribution of produced particles. In the present toy-model study, however, the reaction plane is fixed to the x-z plane, and the quantization axis, corresponding to the direction of the system angular momentum, is taken along the y axis. This choice is made only to define a fixed reference axis for a controlled study of acceptance effects. The detector effect considered here is not implemented through a full detector simulation, but through explicit kinematic selections on the generated parent K 0 mesons and/or their decay daughters. Therefore, the extracted ρ 00 in this work should be understood as the value reconstructed from the accepted daughter-particle cos θ distribution after the selected phase space cuts are applied.
We note that the present toy model does not include event-plane reconstruction, finite event-plane resolution, or track momentum resolution. These effects belong to a more complete detector-response treatment and are conceptually different from the phase space acceptance effect isolated here. Accordingly, the present toy model includes only statistical fit uncertainties associated with the reconstructed angular distributions. Event-plane resolution mainly smears the quantization axis used to define θ , while track momentum resolution smears the reconstructed daughter momentum and therefore the calculated cos θ . For the acceptance-driven effect studied in this work, the dominant distortion arises from whether daughter tracks are accepted or rejected by the imposed η and p T boundaries.
Each K 0 meson is decayed into a charged kaon and pion using standard two-body decay kinematics implemented in PYTHIA. In the subsequent toy-model calculation, 1.0 × 10 8 K 0 mesons are independently generated by sampling from the AMPT-derived parent-meson kinematic distributions and are then decayed once using the isotropic decay prescription. To generate the isotropic reference sample corresponding to ρ 00 = 1 / 3 in full phase space, the daughter emission direction is sampled isotropically in the K 0 rest frame with respect to the chosen quantization axis. Before any acceptance selection is applied, this procedure gives a flat cos θ distribution, as expected for ρ 00 = 1 / 3 . The daughter particles are then boosted to the laboratory frame, where the desired η and/or p T selections are applied. For the accepted daughter pairs, θ is reconstructed event by event in the K 0 rest frame, and the resulting cos θ distribution is fitted with Equation (4) to extract the reconstructed ρ 00 .
Owing to the large toy-model sample size, the statistical uncertainties of the extracted ρ 00 values are very small and are typically much smaller than the marker size in the figures. The quoted uncertainties are obtained from fits to the reconstructed cos θ distributions after the daughter-particle acceptance selections are applied. Typical statistical fit uncertainties are of the order of 10 4 in the present toy-model calculation. In the following figures, statistical uncertainties are included where visible; when they are not visible, they are smaller than the plotted symbols. Therefore, the dominant effect discussed in this work is the systematic shift caused by the imposed acceptance selections, rather than a statistical fluctuation of the Monte Carlo sample.

4. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 presents the extracted ρ 00 of K 0 mesons as a function of the upper limit of the pseudorapidity acceptance | η | in Au+Au collisions at s N N = 54.4 GeV, obtained from the toy model calculation. As discussed earlier, the toy model starts from an isotropic decay angular distribution, which corresponds to ρ 00 = 1 / 3 in full phase space before any acceptance selection is applied. Four configurations are examined to quantify the impact of η selections on the reconstructed ρ 00 : (1) applying η cuts simultaneously to the K 0 mesons and their decay daughters; (2) applying η cuts to the decay daughters only; (3) applying η cuts to the parent K 0 mesons only; and (4) applying η cuts to the parent and daughters together with an additional p T > 0.15 GeV/c threshold on the daughters, consistent with the STAR low p T tracking requirement. These four cases correspond to the red, blue, purple, and green symbol and curves, respectively.
The results indicate that applying η cuts solely on the parent K 0 mesons does not modify the extracted ρ 00 , which remains consistent with the isotropic reference value of 1 / 3 across the full acceptance range. In contrast, imposing η cuts on the decay daughters produces a substantial upward deviation from 1 / 3 when the η window is narrow (e.g., | η | < 1.5 ). When an additional daughter track p T threshold is included, the extracted ρ 00 becomes slightly smaller than in the case with daughters η cuts alone, however, it still exceeds 1 / 3 even in the absence of any η restriction, reflecting the intrinsic bias introduced by the low- p T removal. For all cases without p T cuts, the extracted ρ 00 gradually converges to the isotropic reference value of 1 / 3 once the η acceptance becomes sufficiently wide ( | η | 2 ).
In order to illustrate how the pseudorapidity acceptance affects the reconstructed ρ 00 , Figure 3 shows the cos θ distribution obtained under three conditions: (1) applying | η | < 1 to the decay daughters only, (2) applying the same η cut to the parent K 0 mesons only, and (3) applying the cut simultaneously to both the parent and daughters. The open circles represent the yield in each cos θ bin within the range [−1, 1], and the red curves denote fits using Equation (4). When the η restriction is applied to the decay daughters (left and right panels), the measured distributions exhibit a characteristic parabolic shape with a minimum near cos θ 0. This behavior indicates that decays emitted preferentially transverse to the polarization axis are selectively removed by the finite η acceptance. Since cos θ 0 corresponds to configurations where the daughter momentum is perpendicular to the quantization axis, the suppression of these events distorts the angular distribution and artificially enhances the extracted ρ 00 above the isotropic reference value of 1 / 3 . In contrast, as shown in the middle panel, imposing the same | η | < 1 constraint solely on the parent K 0 mesons leaves the cos θ distribution essentially flat, and the resulting ρ 00 remains consistent with the isotropic reference value of 1 / 3 . These results demonstrate that acceptance-induced distortions originate primarily from kinematic selections applied to the decay daughters rather than the parent mesons. The narrower the daughter phase space window, the stronger the artificial depletion near cos θ 0 , leading to an apparent spin-alignment signal even when the underlying distribution is isotropic.
Quantitatively, the extracted values shown in Figure 3 are ρ 00 = 0.4350 ± 0.0001 for the daughter cut only case, ρ 00 = 0.3338 ± 0.0001 for the parent cut only case, and ρ 00 = 0.4180 ± 0.0001 when the same η cut is applied to both the parent and daughter particles. These values demonstrate that the artificial enhancement of the reconstructed ρ 00 is driven mainly by the daughter particle acceptance, while applying the η cut to the parent K 0 meson alone leaves the reconstructed ρ 00 consistent with the the isotropic reference case.
To further elucidate the impact of the η acceptance on the extracted ρ 00 , Figure 4 presents the two-dimensional distribution of cos θ versus the parent- K 0 transverse momentum, p T K 0 , within a narrow pseudorapidity window | η | < 1 . In this figure, the same pseudorapidity selection is applied to both the parent K 0 mesons and their decay daughters, while no daughter-track p T cut is applied. The decay angle θ is calculated from the daughter-particle momentum in the K 0 rest frame, whereas the p T axis denotes the transverse momentum of the parent K 0 meson.
A clear suppression of yield is observed around cos θ 0 , corresponding to daughter momenta oriented predominantly perpendicular to the quantization axis. This suppression is most pronounced for low- p T K 0 parent mesons. For parent K 0 mesons with small transverse momentum, the decay daughters can more easily acquire large longitudinal momentum components relative to their transverse momenta after being boosted to the laboratory frame. As a result, daughter particles associated with decay topologies around cos θ 0 are more likely to fall outside the finite η acceptance. Their selective removal depletes the yield near cos θ 0 , changes the reconstructed angular distribution from a flat shape to a concave shape, and consequently leads to an extracted ρ 00 value larger than the isotropic expectation of 1 / 3 .
Overall, this two-dimensional pattern provides direct evidence for the kinematic origin of the acceptance-induced bias. The finite η window selectively suppresses daughter tracks from low- p T K 0 parent mesons for decay topologies in which the daughter momenta are oriented predominantly perpendicular to the quantization axis. In contrast, phase space selections applied solely to the parent K 0 mesons do not produce such distortions.
Figure 5 presents the dependence of the extracted ρ 00 on the transverse momentum of the parent K 0 mesons under different pseudorapidity acceptance applied to both the parent K 0 mesons and their decay daughters. This is the same p T definition used in the STAR measurements shown for comparison. In all toy model calculations, the decay angular distribution is isotropic in full phase space, corresponding to ρ 00 = 1 / 3 , so that any deviation of the reconstructed ρ 00 from 1 / 3 originates from the imposed kinematic acceptance selections.
The curves with different colors correspond to upper η limits ranging from | η | < 0.2 to | η | < 3.5 . When the daughter acceptance is narrow (e.g., | η | < 1.5 ), a pronounced enhancement of ρ 00 at low p T is observed. This behavior reflects the stronger sensitivity of daughter-track acceptance to decay topology for low- p T parent mesons. In this region, daughter particles associated with cos θ 0 are more likely to fall outside the finite η window, and their selective removal amplifies the apparent spin-alignment signal. As the η acceptance widens, the reconstructed values gradually converge toward ρ 00 1 / 3 over the full p T range. For acceptance windows with upper limits larger than | η | = 0.7 , the reconstructed ρ 00 approaches 1 / 3 at sufficiently high p T , although the characteristic p T scale of this convergence depends on the width of the η window.
Also shown in Figure 5 are the STAR results at the same collision energy. The purpose of this comparison is not to reinterpret the experimental measurement, but to illustrate the possible magnitude of acceptance-induced distortions in the reconstructed ρ 00 . We note that the p T dependence observed in the STAR data is not fully reproduced by the present toy model. This is expected because the current calculation is constructed with an isotropic angular distribution corresponding to ρ 00 = 1 / 3 and includes only finite kinematic acceptance effects. It does not include genuine spin-alignment dynamics, hadronization-stage spin–orbit correlations, hadronic rescattering or regeneration effects, event-plane resolution, detector-response effects, or details of background subtraction and signal extraction. Therefore, the increase in the measured ρ 00 at intermediate p T may originate from additional physics or experimental effects beyond the pure acceptance baseline isolated in this work. Overall, Figure 5 highlights the important role of daughter-track phase space coverage in precision determinations of vector-meson spin alignment.
Although the present work focuses on K 0 mesons, the same acceptance mechanism can in principle affect other vector mesons reconstructed through two-body decays, such as ϕ mesons. The magnitude of the effect, however, is expected to depend on the decay kinematics, daughter-particle masses, lifetime, and the relevant reconstruction selections. For example, the ϕ K + K decay is kinematically more symmetric than the K 0 K π decay, whereas the K 0 has unequal-mass daughters and is therefore more sensitive to asymmetric phase space rejection. Thus, the qualitative conclusion that daughter acceptance can distort the reconstructed ρ 00 is general, but the quantitative size of the bias should be evaluated separately for each vector-meson species and detector acceptance.

5. Summary

In summary, we have employed the AMPT model to obtain realistic kinematic distributions of K 0 mesons and, based on these inputs, constructed a dedicated toy model to investigate how phase space selections influence the extracted spin-alignment parameter ρ 00 . We find that finite pseudorapidity coverage, such as | η | < 1.5 , can lead to reconstructed ρ 00 values above the isotropic expectation of 1 / 3 , even when the input decay distribution is isotropic. This enhancement arises because, with the system angular momentum oriented in the transverse plane, limited daughter-particle η acceptance preferentially rejects tracks associated with specific decay topologies, thereby distorting the reconstructed cos θ distribution and biasing the fitted ρ 00 toward larger values.
The reconstructed ρ 00 also exhibits acceptance-driven p T dependence, particularly in the low- p T region where daughter particles are more sensitive to the imposed η boundaries. Qualitative comparisons between the toy-model calculations and STAR measurements are presented only as a reference and are not intended to reinterpret or revise the experimental results. Since the present toy model is constructed with an isotropic angular distribution corresponding to ρ 00 = 1 / 3 , any deviation in the reconstructed value originates from the imposed kinematic selections. The comparison therefore illustrates that acceptance effects can contribute to apparent deviations of ρ 00 from 1 / 3 , although additional physics and detector-response effects may also be present in experimental measurements.
We emphasize that the present calculation is a controlled acceptance-level baseline study. It does not include a full detector response, finite event-plane resolution, track-momentum resolution, or background subtraction and signal-extraction effects. These effects should be incorporated in future detector-level or embedding studies to achieve a more quantitative comparison with experimental data. Nevertheless, the present work provides a transparent assessment of acceptance-induced biases in K 0 spin-alignment measurements and may serve as a useful baseline for future high-precision analyses of vector-meson spin alignment in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L.; methodology, Q.L.; software, S.L.; validation, S.L., Q.L. and P.J.; formal analysis, S.L.; investigation, S.L.; resources, S.L.; data curation, S.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L.; writing—review and editing, Q.L.; visualization, S.L.; supervision, P.J.; project administration, S.L.; funding acquisition, S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Pingdingshan University (PXY-BSQD-2023016) and the Natural Science Foundation of Henan under contract No. 252300420921.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Wenpei Xu for useful discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Huang, X.G. An introduction to relativistic spin hydrodynamics. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 2025, 36, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Becattini, F.; Lisa, M.A. Polarization and Vorticity in the Quark–Gluon Plasma. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2020, 70, 395–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Weickgenannt, N.; Speranza, E.; Sheng, X.l.; Wang, Q.; Rischke, D.H. Generating Spin Polarization from Vorticity through Nonlocal Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 127, 052301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fu, B.; Liu, S.Y.F.; Pang, L.; Song, H.; Yin, Y. Shear-Induced Spin Polarization in Heavy-Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 127, 142301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Voloshin, S.A. Vorticity and particle polarization in heavy ion collisions (experimental perspective). EPJ Web Conf. 2018, 171, 07002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, J.H.; Liang, Z.T.; Ma, Y.G.; Sheng, X.L.; Wang, Q. Vector meson’s spin alignments in high energy reactions. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 2025, 68, 211001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liang, Z.T.; Wang, X.N. Globally polarized quark-gluon plasma in non-central A+A collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 102301, Erratum in Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 039901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.102301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liang, Z.T.; Wang, X.N. Spin alignment of vector mesons in non-central A+A collisions. Phys. Lett. B 2005, 629, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adamczyk, L. et al. [The STAR Collaboration] Global Λ hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: Evidence for the most vortical fluid. Nature 2017, 548, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abdallah, M.S. et al. [STAR Collaboration] Pattern of global spin alignment of ϕ and K*0 mesons in heavy-ion collisions. Nature 2023, 614, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Acharya, S. et al. [ALICE Collaboration] Global polarization of Λ Λ ¯ hyperons in Pb-Pb collisions at s N N = 2.76 and 5.02 TeV. Phys. Rev. C 2020, 101, 044611, Erratum in Phys. Rev. C 2022, 105, 029902. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.044611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Acharya, S. et al. [The ALICE Collaboration] Evidence of Spin-Orbital Angular Momentum Interactions in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125, 012301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pang, L.G.; Petersen, H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.N. Vortical Fluid and Λ Spin Correlations in High-Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 117, 192301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xia, X.L.; Li, H.; Tang, Z.B.; Wang, Q. Probing vorticity structure in heavy-ion collisions by local Λ polarization. Phys. Rev. C 2018, 98, 024905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Becattini, F.; Karpenko, I. Collective Longitudinal Polarization in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions at Very High Energy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 012302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Banerjee, S.; Bhadury, S.; Florkowski, W.; Jaiswal, A.; Ryblewski, R. Longitudinal spin polarization in a thermal model with dissipative corrections. Phys. Rev. C 2025, 111, 064912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, H.; Xia, X.L.; Huang, X.G.; Huang, H.Z. Dynamic calculations of magnetic field and implications on spin polarization and spin alignment in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 2023, 108, 044902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, K.J.; Liu, D.N.; Zheng, Y.P.; Chen, J.H.; Ko, C.M.; Ma, Y.G. Deciphering Hypertriton and Antihypertriton Spins from Their Global Polarizations in Heavy-Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 134, 022301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Becattini, F.; Buzzegoli, M.; Niida, T.; Pu, S.; Tang, A.H.; Wang, Q. Spin polarization in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 2024, 33, 2430006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sheng, X.L.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Li, S.W.; Becattini, F.; Hou, D. Holographic spin alignment for vector mesons. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 110, 056047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Steinheimer, J.; Aichelin, J.; Bleicher, M.; Stöcker, H. Influence of the hadronic phase on observables in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 2017, 95, 064902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Adams, J. et al. [STAR Collaboration] K(892)* resonance production in Au+Au and p+p collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV at STAR. Phys. Rev. C 2005, 71, 064902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aggarwal, M.M. et al. [STAR Collaboration] K*0 production in Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at s N N = 62.4 GeV and 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. C 2011, 84, 034909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Acharya, S. et al. [ALICE Collaboration] Evidence of rescattering effect in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC through production of K*(892)0 and ϕ(1020) mesons. Phys. Lett. B 2020, 802, 135225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, Z.; Zha, W.; Tang, Z. Rescattering effect on the measurement of K*0 spin alignment in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 2022, 106, 064908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Z.; Li, Z.; Zha, W.; Tang, Z. Energy dependence of rescattering effect on vector mesons spin alignment at RHIC. Phys. Lett. B 2026, 873, 140161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shen, D.; Chen, J.; Lin, Z.W. The effect of hadronic scatterings on the measurement of vector meson spin alignments in heavy-ion collisions. Chin. Phys. C 2021, 45, 054002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lan, S.; Lin, Z.W.; Shi, S.; Sun, X. Effects of finite coverage on global polarization observables in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Lett. B 2018, 780, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schilling, K.; Seyboth, P.; Wolf, G.E. On the Analysis of Vector Meson Production by Polarized Photons. Nucl. Phys. B 1970, 15, 397–412, Erratum in Nucl. Phys. B 1970, 18, 332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(70)90070-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lin, Z.W.; Ko, C.M.; Li, B.A.; Zhang, B.; Pal, S. A Multi-phase transport model for relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 2005, 72, 064901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, X.N.; Gyulassy, M. HIJING: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in p p, p A and A A collisions. Phys. Rev. D 1991, 44, 3501–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, B. ZPC 1.0.1: A Parton cascade for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1998, 109, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, B.A.; Ko, C.M. Formation of superdense hadronic matter in high-energy heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 1995, 52, 2037–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The K 0 meson spin alignment viewed from the global frame.
Figure 1. The K 0 meson spin alignment viewed from the global frame.
Universe 12 00145 g001
Figure 2. The extracted values of ρ 00 as a function of the upper limit of the pseudorapidity acceptance | η | in Au+Au collisions at s N N = 54.4 GeV, obtained from the toy-model calculation using an isotropic decay angular distribution corresponding to ρ 00 = 1 / 3 in full phase space. The dashed line represents the isotropic expectation of 1 / 3 . The different curves correspond to four selection scenarios: (i) η cuts applied to both the K 0 mesons and their decay daughters, (ii) η cuts applied to the K 0 mesons only, (iii) η cuts applied to the decay daughters only, and (iv) η cuts applied to both the K 0 mesons and daughters together with an additional daughter-track p T requirement. The AMPT-derived parent-kinematic input distributions are constructed from 5.0 × 10 4 minimum-bias Au+Au events at s N N = 54.4 GeV, corresponding to approximately 3.0 × 10 7 AMPT-produced K 0 mesons. The toy-model results shown here are obtained from 1.0 × 10 8 independently generated and decayed K 0 mesons. Statistical uncertainties are included in the extraction and are smaller than the marker size for most points.
Figure 2. The extracted values of ρ 00 as a function of the upper limit of the pseudorapidity acceptance | η | in Au+Au collisions at s N N = 54.4 GeV, obtained from the toy-model calculation using an isotropic decay angular distribution corresponding to ρ 00 = 1 / 3 in full phase space. The dashed line represents the isotropic expectation of 1 / 3 . The different curves correspond to four selection scenarios: (i) η cuts applied to both the K 0 mesons and their decay daughters, (ii) η cuts applied to the K 0 mesons only, (iii) η cuts applied to the decay daughters only, and (iv) η cuts applied to both the K 0 mesons and daughters together with an additional daughter-track p T requirement. The AMPT-derived parent-kinematic input distributions are constructed from 5.0 × 10 4 minimum-bias Au+Au events at s N N = 54.4 GeV, corresponding to approximately 3.0 × 10 7 AMPT-produced K 0 mesons. The toy-model results shown here are obtained from 1.0 × 10 8 independently generated and decayed K 0 mesons. Statistical uncertainties are included in the extraction and are smaller than the marker size for most points.
Universe 12 00145 g002
Figure 3. The reconstructed cos θ distributions obtained with a pseudorapidity selection of | η | < 1 applied to three different cases: (i) the decay daughters only, (ii) the parent K 0 mesons only, and (iii) both the parent K 0 mesons and their decay daughters. The red curves represent fits to the distributions using Equation (4). The AMPT-derived parent-kinematic input distributions are constructed from 5.0 × 10 4 minimum-bias Au+Au events at s N N = 54.4 GeV, corresponding to approximately 3.0 × 10 7 AMPT-produced K 0 mesons. The distributions shown here are obtained from the toy-model sample of 1.0 × 10 8 independently generated and decayed K 0 mesons. The quoted uncertainties on the extracted ρ 00 values are statistical uncertainties from the fits.
Figure 3. The reconstructed cos θ distributions obtained with a pseudorapidity selection of | η | < 1 applied to three different cases: (i) the decay daughters only, (ii) the parent K 0 mesons only, and (iii) both the parent K 0 mesons and their decay daughters. The red curves represent fits to the distributions using Equation (4). The AMPT-derived parent-kinematic input distributions are constructed from 5.0 × 10 4 minimum-bias Au+Au events at s N N = 54.4 GeV, corresponding to approximately 3.0 × 10 7 AMPT-produced K 0 mesons. The distributions shown here are obtained from the toy-model sample of 1.0 × 10 8 independently generated and decayed K 0 mesons. The quoted uncertainties on the extracted ρ 00 values are statistical uncertainties from the fits.
Universe 12 00145 g003
Figure 4. The two-dimensional distribution of cos θ versus the parent K 0 transverse momentum, p T K 0 , obtained from the toy-model calculation. The decay angle θ is calculated from the daughter-particle momentum in the K 0 rest frame, while the horizontal axis denotes the transverse momentum of the parent K 0 meson. A pseudorapidity selection of | η | < 1 is applied to both the parent K 0 mesons and their decay daughters, and no daughter-track p T cut is applied in this figure. The AMPT-derived parent-kinematic input distributions are constructed from 5.0 × 10 4 minimum-bias Au+Au events at s N N = 54.4 GeV, corresponding to approximately 3.0 × 10 7 AMPT-produced K 0 mesons. The distribution shown here is obtained from the toy-model sample of 1.0 × 10 8 independently generated and decayed K 0 mesons.
Figure 4. The two-dimensional distribution of cos θ versus the parent K 0 transverse momentum, p T K 0 , obtained from the toy-model calculation. The decay angle θ is calculated from the daughter-particle momentum in the K 0 rest frame, while the horizontal axis denotes the transverse momentum of the parent K 0 meson. A pseudorapidity selection of | η | < 1 is applied to both the parent K 0 mesons and their decay daughters, and no daughter-track p T cut is applied in this figure. The AMPT-derived parent-kinematic input distributions are constructed from 5.0 × 10 4 minimum-bias Au+Au events at s N N = 54.4 GeV, corresponding to approximately 3.0 × 10 7 AMPT-produced K 0 mesons. The distribution shown here is obtained from the toy-model sample of 1.0 × 10 8 independently generated and decayed K 0 mesons.
Universe 12 00145 g004
Figure 5. The solid symbols connected by lines represent the extracted ρ 00 as a function of the parent K 0 transverse momentum, p T K 0 , for different pseudorapidity selections applied to both the parent K 0 mesons and their decay daughters in Au+Au collisions at s N N = 54.4 GeV. The same p T K 0 definition is used for the STAR measurements shown by the red solid stars. The dashed line represents the isotropic expectation of 1 / 3 . The toy-model calculation is performed with an isotropic angular distribution corresponding to ρ 00 = 1 / 3 in full phase space. The AMPT-derived parent-kinematic input distributions are constructed from 5.0 × 10 4 minimum-bias Au+Au events at s N N = 54.4 GeV, corresponding to approximately 3.0 × 10 7 AMPT-produced K 0 mesons. The toy-model results shown here are obtained from 1.0 × 10 8 independently generated and decayed K 0 mesons. The statistical uncertainties of the toy-model points are included in the extraction and are smaller than the marker size for most points.
Figure 5. The solid symbols connected by lines represent the extracted ρ 00 as a function of the parent K 0 transverse momentum, p T K 0 , for different pseudorapidity selections applied to both the parent K 0 mesons and their decay daughters in Au+Au collisions at s N N = 54.4 GeV. The same p T K 0 definition is used for the STAR measurements shown by the red solid stars. The dashed line represents the isotropic expectation of 1 / 3 . The toy-model calculation is performed with an isotropic angular distribution corresponding to ρ 00 = 1 / 3 in full phase space. The AMPT-derived parent-kinematic input distributions are constructed from 5.0 × 10 4 minimum-bias Au+Au events at s N N = 54.4 GeV, corresponding to approximately 3.0 × 10 7 AMPT-produced K 0 mesons. The toy-model results shown here are obtained from 1.0 × 10 8 independently generated and decayed K 0 mesons. The statistical uncertainties of the toy-model points are included in the extraction and are smaller than the marker size for most points.
Universe 12 00145 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lan, S.; Liu, Q.; Ji, P. Acceptance Effects on the Extracted Spin Alignment of K*0 Mesons in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions. Universe 2026, 12, 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12050145

AMA Style

Lan S, Liu Q, Ji P. Acceptance Effects on the Extracted Spin Alignment of K*0 Mesons in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions. Universe. 2026; 12(5):145. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12050145

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lan, Shaowei, Qiuhua Liu, and Pengfei Ji. 2026. "Acceptance Effects on the Extracted Spin Alignment of K*0 Mesons in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions" Universe 12, no. 5: 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12050145

APA Style

Lan, S., Liu, Q., & Ji, P. (2026). Acceptance Effects on the Extracted Spin Alignment of K*0 Mesons in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions. Universe, 12(5), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12050145

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop