Electrolytic Gated Organic Field-effect Transistors for Application in Biosensors—a Review

Electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistors have emerged in the field of biosensors over the last five years, due to their attractive simplicity and high sensitivity to interfacial changes, both on the gate/electrolyte and semiconductor/electrolyte interfaces, where a target-specific bioreceptor can be immobilized. This article reviews the recent literature concerning biosensing with such transistors, gives clues to understanding the basic principles under which electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistors work, and details the transduction mechanisms that were investigated to convert a receptor/target association into a change in drain current.


Introduction
A biosensor, defined by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), is "a device which uses specific biochemical reactions mediated by isolated enzymes, immunosystems, tissues, organelles or whole cells to detect chemical or biological compounds, usually by use of electrical, thermal or optical signals" [1,2].Biosensors are promising analytical tools for healthcare, monitoring food toxins and pathogens, and environmental screening due to their unique characteristics of affordability, portability, disposability, and simple construction [3].From the first biosensor reported (enzyme-coated oxygen electrode [4]), more and more biosensors were reported, mostly for medical applications: blood gases, hemoglobin, glucose, calcium, urea and many other critical analyses.Biosensors are also able to sense basic parameters such as humidity or pH, but also numerous types of non-biological compounds such as heavy metals or small organic pollutant molecules such as bisphenol A. However, until now, biosensors have not invaded the market.This may be due to a still too high production cost, at least for most everyday life applications.With the coming of the Web of Things, i.e., connected objects implementing sensors, along with a growing need for healthcare devices, biosensors may at last fulfill their promises.For this, they must be better interfaced with electronics; transistors as biosensing components may be the way to achieve this objective.
A transistor (a "transfer resistor", because "it is a resistor or semiconductor device which can amplify electrical signals as they are transferred through it from input to output terminals", as defined by the three winners of Nobel Prizes in Physics in 1956) is composed of a semiconductor material with three or four terminals for connection to an external circuit.A voltage or current applied to one pair of the transistor's terminals ("gate" and "body") changes the current through another pair of terminals ("source" and "drain").
Nowadays, the most popular transistor used is the field-effect transistor (FET) [5], even if electrochemical transistors based of PEDOT:PSS, poly(ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate), are widely reported as well [6].In the past few years, field-effect transistors have been intensively investigated for biosensing applications, because of their natural integration into portable electronic devices, but also because the field effect is capacitance-related, and this capacitance is known to be very sensitive to surface changes.For example, the presence of guest molecules over one of the gate/dielectric or dielectric/semiconductor interface would result in a shift of the conductance of the semiconductor.However, the main drawback with conventional silicon-based transistors is the high cost of silicon microlithography operated in clean room, which is prohibitive for disposable sensors.Nevertheless, their sensitivities are high, characterized by subthreshold swings of ca.70 mV/dec for conventional inorganic MOSFETs and significantly lower values for non-conventional FETs such as tunneling FETs (10-20 mV/dec), which are based on band-to band tunneling due to band bending induced by charges immobilized at the interface between a semiconductor nanowire and a solution [7]).Organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs) will probably never compete with inorganic ones in terms of carrier mobility and operating frequency, and their subthreshold swing is often much higher, which makes them intrinsically less sensitive up to now.However, organic semiconductors can be processed at low cost, for example by use of printing techniques, and can be easily chemically modified to adjust their properties, which is decisive for biosensors where the recognition elements have to be attached [8].

General Concepts of Transistors
A field effect transistor (FET) is consists of three metallic conducting electrodes: source (S), drain (D) and Gate (G), a very thin insulating layer (dielectric) and a semiconductor, the latter being the active part of the device where charge carriers flow.Numerous geometries were described, among which the gate could be on top of the semiconductor (top-gate) or at the bottom of the semiconductor (bottom-gate).Similarly, the source and drain can contact the top (top-contact) or the bottom (bottom-contact) of the semiconductor.The working principle of a FET is the following: a voltage applied to the gate modifies the charge carrier density in the semiconductor in between source and drain, which therefore modulates the source-drain current.There are two kinds of charge carriers: electrons (e) and hole (h) for n or p type semiconductors, respectively.Dealing with organic FETs (OFETs), electron donating organic semiconductors involving a high highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) level are good candidates for p-type semiconductors, while electron-accepting ones with low HOMO levels are used as n-type semiconductors.
In OFETs, the gate is separated from the semi-conductor by an insulator.Different dielectrics can be used, e.g., oxides, polymers, self-assembled monolayers.When the gate is, for instance, negatively polarized in a p-channel device, free holes in the semi-conductor are drawn toward the semi-conductor-insulator interface to compensate an equivalent negative charge at the gate-insulator interface (Figure 1a).When a negative voltage is applied between source and drain, holes are injected from the source and current flows inside the channel.The OFET characteristics are greatly affected by the properties of the dielectric-insulator interface or at grain boundaries.The first OFET was made by Tsumura et al., in 1986, who reported a I on /I off ratio (i.e., the ratio between the maximum current flowing at saturation and the minimum current when the transistor is in its blocked state) of 100, and charge carrier mobility of 10 ´5 cm 2 ¨V´1 [9], using a polythiophene semiconductor.
gate-insulator interface (Figure 1a).When a negative voltage is applied between source and drain, holes are injected from the source and current flows inside the channel.The OFET characteristics are greatly affected by the properties of the dielectric-insulator interface or at grain boundaries.The first OFET was made by Tsumura et al., in 1986, who reported a Ion/Ioff ratio (i.e., the ratio between the maximum current flowing at saturation and the minimum current when the transistor is in its blocked state) of 100, and charge carrier mobility of 10 −5 cm 2 •V −1 [9], using a polythiophene semiconductor.

EGOFETs
Electrolyte-gated OFETs are significantly different from classical OFETs; indeed, the organic semiconducting layer is in contact with an electrolyte instead of a classical dielectric.In EGOFETs, the conductivity of the semiconducting channel is modulated by a solid or a liquid electrolyte put in between the semiconductor and the gate.EGOFETs display much a higher gate capacitance (up to ~1000 higher) than other types of OFETs, which use traditional inorganic or organic non-electrolytic dielectrics; as a consequence, biasing voltages used for EGOFETs are typically much smaller than those necessary for OFETs (<1 V, versus >10 V or even higher).These two characteristics (electrolyte-possibly water-and low potential) make EGOFETs ideal candidates for the next generation of biosensors, particularly suitable for the detection and quantification of biological molecules inside aqueous media.The extremely good sensing capabilities of EGOFETs rely on the possibility of properly functionalizing the gate electrode by means of specific molecules or functional groups able to interact with the target molecules present inside the electrolyte.The most common architecture is the top-gate, bottom-contact configuration.The gate electrode is immersed in the electrolyte and source and drain electrodes, isolated from the electrolyte, provide electrical contact to the channel (Figure 1b).Actually, an EGOFET looks like an OECT (organic electrochemical transistor) [10][11][12][13][14][15][16].However, in an OECT, the on/off switch is produced by electron transfer from the electrolyte and the semiconductor (doping/de-doping) [8], whereas only capacitive processes occur for EGOFETs but no charge transfer.
In an EGOFET made with a p-type semiconductor, upon positive polarization of the gate, the anions of the electrolyte accumulate at the electrolyte/semiconductor interface while the cations accumulate at the electrolyte/OSC interface, resulting in the formation of an electrical double layer (EDL) at both interfaces.The EDL is composed of the Helmholtz layer (HL) and the diffuse layer (DL).The HL is a monolayer of ions, whereas the DL is simply more concentrated in ions (either cations or anions) than in the bulk electrolyte.In other words, the excess of ions decreases with the distance from the interface.As shown on Figure 2, when the gate is (for example) negatively polarized, the excess of electrons at the gate surface produces the accumulation of cations at the gate/electrolyte interface; conversely, accumulation of anions at the electrolyte/semiconductor interface produces accumulations of holes in the topmost layer of the semiconductor [17,18], which causes the OSC to become conducting.It has been shown that a significant double layer can form even for very low operating potentials, nevertheless sufficient to generate a locally high electrical field at the electrolyte/semiconductor interface, and therefore a high charge carrier density [8].
The electrolyte used can be polymers [19][20][21][22], ionic liquids [23][24][25] or ionic gels [16,[26][27][28][29]. Aqueous liquid electrolytes were also reported.For example, Kergoat et al. [10] first reported a device gated with water (Figure 3).By replacing the gate dielectric by a simple water droplet, they produced a transistor that entirely operates in the field-effect mode at voltages lower than 1 V.They have shown (unpublished results) that the electrical characteristics do not depend on the pH in a range between 4 and 8, which is well adapted to biomolecules.
distance from the interface.As shown on Figure 2, when the gate is (for example) negatively polarized, the excess of electrons at the gate surface produces the accumulation of cations at the gate/electrolyte interface; conversely, accumulation of anions at the electrolyte/semiconductor interface produces accumulations of holes in the topmost layer of the semiconductor [17,18], which causes the OSC to become conducting.It has been shown that a significant double layer can form even for very low operating potentials, nevertheless sufficient to generate a locally high electrical field at the electrolyte/semiconductor interface, and therefore a high charge carrier density [8].The electrolyte used can be polymers [19][20][21][22], ionic liquids [23][24][25] or ionic gels [16,[26][27][28][29]. Aqueous liquid electrolytes were also reported.For example, Kergoat et al. [10] first reported a device gated with water (Figure 3).By replacing the gate dielectric by a simple water droplet, they produced a transistor that entirely operates in the field-effect mode at voltages lower than 1 V.They have shown (unpublished results) that the electrical characteristics do not depend on the pH in a range between 4 and 8, which is well adapted to biomolecules.This result creates opportunities for sensor applications.Indeed, water is the natural environment for biological receptors [30].In this case, water must act both as the electrolyte and the media responsible for carrying the analytic sample, which is the current challenge to develop EGOFET-based biosensors.However, in such conditions, an electrochemical doping (i.e., insertion into the semiconductor of ions from the electrolyte) may occur, which decreases the capacitance and the field effect and therefore degrades the semiconductor electrical properties.This is the main reason why the performances of EGOFET often decrease dramatically upon use [31,32]; this constitutes an important issue that must be addressed; for example, by developing highly hydrophobic polymeric OSC.However, some small analytes or even ions have no problems to pass a thin hydrophobic barrier.High crystallinity of the organic semiconductor can suppress diffusion of such species.Since most polymer films are semi-crystalline at best, this might be an aspect where crystalline films made from small molecules might be superior in terms of blocking and should be investigated.Another issue that must be addressed is their high subthreshold swing, typically of several hundreds of millivolts, which impede their sensitivity.A strategy may be to switch from   The electrolyte used can be polymers [19][20][21][22], ionic liquids [23][24][25] or ionic gels [16,[26][27][28][29]. Aqueous liquid electrolytes were also reported.For example, Kergoat et al. [10] first reported a device gated with water (Figure 3).By replacing the gate dielectric by a simple water droplet, they produced a transistor that entirely operates in the field-effect mode at voltages lower than 1 V.They have shown (unpublished results) that the electrical characteristics do not depend on the pH in a range between 4 and 8, which is well adapted to biomolecules.This result creates opportunities for sensor applications.Indeed, water is the natural environment for biological receptors [30].In this case, water must act both as the electrolyte and the media responsible for carrying the analytic sample, which is the current challenge to develop EGOFET-based biosensors.However, in such conditions, an electrochemical doping (i.e., insertion into the semiconductor of ions from the electrolyte) may occur, which decreases the capacitance and the field effect and therefore degrades the semiconductor electrical properties.This is the main reason why the performances of EGOFET often decrease dramatically upon use [31,32]; this constitutes an important issue that must be addressed; for example, by developing highly hydrophobic polymeric OSC.However, some small analytes or even ions have no problems to pass a thin hydrophobic barrier.High crystallinity of the organic semiconductor can suppress diffusion of such species.Since most polymer films are semi-crystalline at best, this might be an aspect where crystalline films made from small molecules might be superior in terms of blocking and should be investigated.Another issue that must be addressed is their high subthreshold swing, typically of several hundreds of millivolts, which impede their sensitivity.A strategy may be to switch from This result creates opportunities for sensor applications.Indeed, water is the natural environment for biological receptors [30].In this case, water must act both as the electrolyte and the media responsible for carrying the analytic sample, which is the current challenge to develop EGOFET-based biosensors.However, in such conditions, an electrochemical doping (i.e., insertion into the semiconductor of ions from the electrolyte) may occur, which decreases the capacitance and the field effect and therefore degrades the semiconductor electrical properties.This is the main reason why the performances of EGOFET often decrease dramatically upon use [31,32]; this constitutes an important issue that must be addressed; for example, by developing highly hydrophobic polymeric OSC.However, some small analytes or even ions have no problems to pass a thin hydrophobic barrier.High crystallinity of the organic semiconductor can suppress diffusion of such species.Since most polymer films are semi-crystalline at best, this might be an aspect where crystalline films made from small molecules might be superior in terms of blocking and should be investigated.Another issue that must be addressed is their high subthreshold swing, typically of several hundreds of millivolts, which impede their sensitivity.A strategy may be to switch from classical OSC to graphene-based materials, e.g., graphene or reduced graphene oxide, which has already been reported [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], but this will not be discussed here.Readers who are interested in grapheme-based EGOFETs may report on the review from Yan et al., 2013, which dealt with graphene-based transistors for biological sensors [47].However, graphene has been shown to have low sensitivity due to lack of bandgap.For this reason, other electrolyte-gated inorganic FETs are also promising, for example based on MoS 2 semiconductor [48].In EGOFETs, the gate material also influences the figures of merit of the devices, particularly the threshold potential V T [49,50].However, most of the transistor characteristics come from the semiconducting material itself and from the quality of the contact between the source and drain electrodes and the OSC.This quality noticeably depends on the way the semiconductor is deposited.

Deposition Techniques
Several deposition techniques were described; among them: spin coating, vacuum thermal deposition, printing and spray deposition.Spin-coating and drop-casting remain the most popular in laboratory, whereas inkjet printing and spray deposition are preferentially used in industry; vacuum thermal evaporation is used in both environments.

Vacuum Thermal Evaporation
For vacuum thermal evaporation, both the semiconducting material and the substrate are placed in high vacuum.The OSC is thermally sublimated then is condensed on the cold substrate to form a film, the thickness of which being controlled by the deposition time and the temperature [51,52].

Spin-Coating
Spin-coating consists of spinning the substrate onto which a solution containing the semiconducting material is deposited.Spinning produces a centrifugal force that homogeneously spreads the solution and forms a very thin film over the substrate; its thickness is a balance between the centrifugal force and the solution viscosity.During this operation, the solvent evaporates, leaving a thin film of semiconducting material.An additional annealing step is needed to crystalize the semiconductor molecules, which improve the electrical performances [53,54].Very roughly, the film thickness depends on the concentration of the solution (the more concentrated, the thicker), the rotation speed (the faster, the thinner) and the evaporation rate of the solvent (the faster, the thicker).Compared to vacuum thermal evaporation, the advantage of spin-coating is that it does not need heating, which avoids thermal degradation of semiconductors.The main limitation is that all semiconductors cannot dissolve in volatile solvents.

Inkjet Printing and Spray Deposition
Inkjet printing is a non-contact solution-processed technique which allows non-lithographic patterning, for a lateral resolution as small as 5 µm, however depending on substrate preparation [55,56].Inkjet printing is an additive technology and is therefore much less wasteful than other solution-based methods using subtractive patterning methods; it generally ensures a better electrical contact with the underlying electrode/material than the vacuum thermal evaporation [57] but it has the disadvantages of poor lateral resolution compared to lithography [31,[58][59][60].
Spray deposition is another non-contact solution-based method.In this case, instead of thermal of piezoelectric propulsion of the ink, the liquid is pumped and guided through a gas flow to the substrate.Like for inkjet-printing, the ink arrives at the substrate as micrometric droplets.For this reason, a challenge for both techniques is to achieve uniform films [52,61].

Poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT)
P3HT is the most common OSC used during the last decade [19].Kline et al. analyzed a series of regioregular polythiophenes on an OTFT device.They found that the crystallinity and molecular weight are two important parameters on the hole mobility, resulting from the well-defined molecular architecture of P3HT [78].For example, 3-hexylthiophene units may polymerize through head-to-tail, head-to-head or tail-to-tail couplings; the percentage of head-to-tail coupling represents the degree of regioregularity of P3HT, which is critical to the electronic properties of the material.High-performance OFETs based on highly regioregular P3HT were successfully fabricated by solution process and showed hole mobilities higher than 0.1 cm 2 /Vs and very high on/off ratios (>10 5 ) [79].
If P3HT is deposited by spin-coating, the best solvent is chloroform, due to its rapid evaporation which limits crystallization during the spin-coating process [79,80]; this impose a thermal post-treatment process able to favor crystallization and π−π stacking of the P3HT backbone.It has been shown that this results in a lamellar structure formed by interchain stacking (Figure 5).It has also been shown that the hole mobility varies by two orders of magnitude depending on orientation (parallel or normal to the substrate) of the lamellae [53,54,[81][82][83][84][85][86], the normal one giving the highest mobility.

Poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT)
P3HT is the most common OSC used during the last decade [19].Kline et al. analyzed a series of regioregular polythiophenes on an OTFT device.They found that the crystallinity and molecular weight are two important parameters on the hole mobility, resulting from the well-defined molecular architecture of P3HT [78].For example, 3-hexylthiophene units may polymerize through head-to-tail, head-to-head or tail-to-tail couplings; the percentage of head-to-tail coupling represents the degree of regioregularity of P3HT, which is critical to the electronic properties of the material.High-performance OFETs based on highly regioregular P3HT were successfully fabricated by solution process and showed hole mobilities higher than 0.1 cm 2 /Vs and very high on/off ratios (>10 5 ) [79].
If P3HT is deposited by spin-coating, the best solvent is chloroform, due to its rapid evaporation which limits crystallization during the spin-coating process [79,80]; this impose a thermal post-treatment process able to favor crystallization and π´π stacking of the P3HT backbone.It has been shown that this results in a lamellar structure formed by interchain stacking (Figure 5).It has also been shown that the hole mobility varies by two orders of magnitude depending on orientation (parallel or normal to the substrate) of the lamellae [53,54,[81][82][83][84][85][86], the normal one giving the highest mobility.According to the work of Alberga et al. [53], spin-coated then annealed P3HT displays three different zones: an interfacial zone close to the substrate (thickness of 10 Å), an intermediate zone 30 Å thick atop and an OSC/electrolyte interfacial zone over this distance; the first layers display the highest degree of order [53,[87][88][89].
Some strategies were proposed to improve the performance and/or biocompatibility of P3HT.For example, Liu et al. printed P3HT above another terrylene semiconductor to make a heterojunction of semiconductor [57].Thiemann et al. spray-coated a layer of ion gel based of silane-ionic liquids on P3HT to obtain advantageous properties such as low modulus, solution processability and high specific capacitance [61].Magliulo et al. modified the surface of P3HT by plasma-enhanced vapor chemical deposition (PE-CVD) of a mixture of ethylene, acrylic acid and argon in a 1:3:1 ratio, which increased the -COOH content at the surface, eventually used to covalently graft phospholipids on the OSC, themselves used to bind biological molecules [64,71,90].Kergoat et al. [91], Sinno et al. [59] and Toss et al. [92] used chemical reactions to bind P3HT with another polymer to make new semiconductor polymer blends with improved stability, electronic performances and biocompatibility.Suspène et al. used peptidic coupling to directly graft biotin on P3HT in order to make a proof-of-concept streptavidin or avidin sensor [93].All these approaches impose making compromises between the electrical and immobilization properties.
Even if P3HT is certainly the mostly used semiconductor in OFETs, its instability is well known, which obviously limits its utilization for biosensors [94][95][96].pBTTT has recently attracted attention as another promising solution-processed semiconducting polymer.pBTTT shows better performances than P3HT (hole mobility up to 1.0 cm 2 /Vs for pBTTT versus 0.1 cm 2 /Vs for P3HT [97,98]), less electrochemical doping and much better stability in aqueous environment [53,99].
Liquid-crystalline pBTTT was firstly used as semiconductor layer in liquid-gated structure by Naim et al. [100]; Chao et al. show that pBTTT has a similar lamellar structure than P3HT [101]; however, pBTTT has larger crystalline domains extended over several hundreds of nm [75,96,98] (Figure 6).This probably explains why pBTTT has better performances [102,103].used peptidic coupling to directly graft biotin on P3HT in order to make a proof-of-concept streptavidin or avidin sensor [93].All these approaches impose making compromises between the electrical and immobilization properties.Even if P3HT is certainly the mostly used semiconductor in OFETs, its instability is well known, which obviously limits its utilization for biosensors [94][95][96].pBTTT has recently attracted attention as another promising solution-processed semiconducting polymer.pBTTT shows better performances than P3HT (hole mobility up to 1.0 cm 2 /Vs for pBTTT versus 0.1 cm 2 /Vs for P3HT [97,98]), less electrochemical doping and much better stability in aqueous environment [53,99].
Liquid-crystalline pBTTT was firstly used as semiconductor layer in liquid-gated structure by Naim et al. [100]; Chao et al. show that pBTTT has a similar lamellar structure than P3HT [101]; however, pBTTT has larger crystalline domains extended over several hundreds of nm [75,96,98] (Figure 6).This probably explains why pBTTT has better performances [102,103].According to the work of Alberga et al. [53], spin-coated then annealed P3HT displays three different zones: an interfacial zone close to the substrate (thickness of 10 Å), an intermediate zone 30 Å thick atop and an OSC/electrolyte interfacial zone over this distance; the first layers display the highest degree of order [53,[87][88][89].
Some strategies were proposed to improve the performance and/or biocompatibility of P3HT.For example, Liu et al. printed P3HT above another terrylene semiconductor to make a heterojunction of semiconductor [57].Thiemann et al. spray-coated a layer of ion gel based of silane-ionic liquids on P3HT to obtain advantageous properties such as low modulus, solution processability and high specific capacitance [61].Magliulo et al. modified the surface of P3HT by plasma-enhanced vapor chemical deposition (PE-CVD) of a mixture of ethylene, acrylic acid and argon in a 1:3:1 ratio, which increased the -COOH content at the surface, eventually used to covalently graft phospholipids on the OSC, themselves used to bind biological molecules [64,71,90].Kergoat et al. [91], Sinno et al. [59] and Toss et al. [92] used chemical reactions to bind P3HT with another polymer to make new semiconductor polymer blends with improved stability, electronic performances and biocompatibility.Suspène et al. used peptidic coupling to directly graft biotin on P3HT in order to make a proof-of-concept streptavidin or avidin sensor [93].All these approaches impose making compromises between the electrical and immobilization properties.Even if P3HT is certainly the mostly used semiconductor in OFETs, its instability is well known, which obviously limits its utilization for biosensors [94][95][96].pBTTT has recently attracted attention as another promising solution-processed semiconducting polymer.pBTTT shows better performances than P3HT (hole mobility up to 1.0 cm 2 /Vs for pBTTT versus 0.1 cm 2 /Vs for P3HT [97,98]), less electrochemical doping and much better stability in aqueous environment [53,99].
Liquid-crystalline pBTTT was firstly used as semiconductor layer in liquid-gated structure by Naim et al. [100]; Chao et al. show that pBTTT has a similar lamellar structure than P3HT [101]; however, pBTTT has larger crystalline domains extended over several hundreds of nm [75,96,98] (Figure 6).This probably explains why pBTTT has better performances [102,103].The best solvent for spin-coating pBTTT is chlorobenzene.It was shown that, because the boiling point of chlorobenzene is high, few residual solvent molecules may remain after annealing, and these solvent molecules may behave as plasticizer, increase free space between chains thus facilitate orientation and crystallization [53,98,102].

Biosensors with EGOFETs
Hereafter are reviewed the various EGOFET-based biosensors reported in the literature since 2012.
5.1.α-Sexithiophene (α6T)-Based EGOFET Sensor for Detection of Enzyme Activity Buth et al. described in 2012 [11] an EGOFET which they named solution-gated organic field-effect transistors.The semiconductor (α-sexithiophene) surface was modified by -OH or -NH 2 groups, leading to a pH sensor operating in a pH range relative to the pK a of the added surface functions.The hydroxyl groups were added by oxidation under UV, and the amine groups were added by grafting 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane.The on/off ratio at V DS = ´50 mV was between 10 2 and 10 3 , with a field-effect mobility of 4 ˆ10 ´2 cm 2 ¨V´1 ¨s´1 .The authors found a sensitivity of 14 mV¨pH ´1.As a proof-of-concept, they immobilized the penicillinase enzyme on the semiconductor and sensed penicillin (Figure 7) by the way of an acid-base titration.They found a detection limit of ca. 5 µM.At low penicillin concentration, the sensitivity of the device was ca.80 µV¨µM ´1.
Electronics 2016, 5, 9 8 of 23 The best solvent for spin-coating pBTTT is chlorobenzene.It was shown that, because the boiling point of chlorobenzene is high, few residual solvent molecules may remain after annealing, and these solvent molecules may behave as plasticizer, increase free space between chains thus facilitate orientation and crystallization [53,98,102].

Biosensors with EGOFETs
Hereafter are reviewed the various EGOFET-based biosensors reported in the literature since 2012.

α-Sexithiophene (α6T)-Based EGOFET Sensor for Detection of Enzyme Activity
Buth et al. described in 2012 [11] an EGOFET which they named solution-gated organic field-effect transistors.The semiconductor (α-sexithiophene) surface was modified by -OH or -NH2 groups, leading to a pH sensor operating in a pH range relative to the pKa of the added surface functions.The hydroxyl groups were added by oxidation under UV, and the amine groups were added by grafting 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane.The on/off ratio at VDS = −50 mV was between 10 2 and 10 3 , with a field-effect mobility of 4 × 10 −2 cm 2 •V −1 •s −1 .The authors found a sensitivity of 14 mV•pH −1 .As a proof-of-concept, they immobilized the penicillinase enzyme on the semiconductor and sensed penicillin (Figure 7) by the way of an acid-base titration.They found a detection limit of ca. 5 μM.At low penicillin concentration, the sensitivity of the device was ca.80 μV•μM −1 .

P3HT-Based EGOFET Sensor for DNA Detection
A DNA EGOFET sensor was first reported by Kergoat et al. [70] (Figure 8A), in which the dielectric is constituted by a simple droplet of aqueous phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.2)

P3HT-Based EGOFET Sensor for DNA Detection
A DNA EGOFET sensor was first reported by Kergoat et al. [70] (Figure 8A), in which the dielectric is constituted by a simple droplet of aqueous phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.2) solution.This device allows operating at very low voltages (below 1 V).This renders possible the use of buffer solutions within their electrochemical stability window.A P3HT bearing carboxylic acid moieties was used to perform covalent ODN (oligonucleotide) grafting, providing that they are modified at one end with a -COOH group.Changes in the output characteristics of the device were observed upon DNA immobilization and after DNA hybridization (Table 1), of 40 to 60 mV of gate voltage shift for 100 nM target DNA.This shift towards negative values was attributed to the negative charge of the DNA backbone.The off current was also modified and decreased after DNA immobilization.This behavior was attributed to the steric hindrance of DNA chains that eventually prevents ion penetration into the bulk of the semiconductor (Figure 8B).Other experiments, obtained with various ionic strength, pointed out the importance of the Debye length that can screen negative DNA charges.
Electronics 2016, 5, 9 9 of 23 solution.This device allows operating at very low voltages (below 1 V).This renders possible the use of buffer solutions within their electrochemical stability window.A P3HT bearing carboxylic acid moieties was used to perform covalent ODN (oligonucleotide) grafting, providing that they are modified at one end with a -COOH group.Changes in the output characteristics of the device were observed upon DNA immobilization and after DNA hybridization (Table 1), of 40 to 60 mV of gate voltage shift for 100 nM target DNA.This shift towards negative values was attributed to the negative charge of the DNA backbone.The off current was also modified and decreased after DNA immobilization.This behavior was attributed to the steric hindrance of DNA chains that eventually prevents ion penetration into the bulk of the semiconductor (Figure 8B).Other experiments, obtained with various ionic strength, pointed out the importance of the Debye length that can screen negative DNA charges.
(A) (B)   Schmoltner et al. reported an EGOFET based on P3HT for which they investigated the effect of the gate material (as in ref. [10]) and of the ionic strength of the electrolyte on the device performances [104].Magliulo et al. published in 2013 a work where they demonstrated PE-CVD of an hydrophilic thin layer (plasma deposited ethylene/acrylic acid (pdEthAA)) carrying COOH groups on P3HT (Figure 9) [71].The thickness of the coating was particularly monitored because it should be minimized to avoid adverse effect on the EGOFET performance.A comparison between pristine P3HT and pdEthAA/P3HT bilayer is given on Figure 10.It is also shown on this figure that the gate current (I G , red curves and right Y-scale) stay low, which demonstrates the field-effect mode of operation and excludes the electrochemical mode of operation; this shows that the hydrophobic layer fully plays its role by impeding ion penetration in the OSC.In addition, the authors reported that chemical or biological species could be covalently immobilized on such functional hydrophobic/hydrophilic bilayer, such as DNA probes (even if not described in their article).
Electronics 2016, 5, 9 10 of 23  [10]) and of the ionic strength of the electrolyte on the device performances [104].Magliulo et al. published in 2013 a work where they demonstrated PE-CVD of an hydrophilic thin layer (plasma deposited ethylene/acrylic acid (pdEthAA)) carrying COOH groups on P3HT (Figure 9) [71].The thickness of the coating was particularly monitored because it should be minimized to avoid adverse effect on the EGOFET performance.A comparison between pristine P3HT and pdEthAA/P3HT bilayer is given on Figure 10.It is also shown on this figure that the gate current (IG, red curves and right Y-scale) stay low, which demonstrates the field-effect mode of operation and excludes the electrochemical mode of operation; this shows that the hydrophobic layer fully plays its role by impeding ion penetration in the OSC.In addition, the authors reported that chemical or biological species could be covalently immobilized on such functional hydrophobic/hydrophilic bilayer, such as DNA probes (even if not described in their article).

P3HT-Based EGOFET for Protein (Streptavidin) Detection
Suspene et al. reported in 2013 on the sensing of streptavidin with an EGOFET using a copolymer of P3HT, P3HT-COOH and biotinylated P3HT (Figure 11A) as the active sensing and semiconducting material [93].The biotin-streptavidin couple was chosen as a proof-of-concept, for its extremely low dissociation constant.Non-specific interactions were reduced due to the presence of the COOH function; it was further reduced when the polymer surface was pretreated with 1-octanol, which interacted non-covalently with P3HT with its C8 alkyl chain.In this case, human serum albumin had no effect on the transistor characteristics, whereas streptavidin led to a decrease of the drain current (Figure 11B).

P3HT-Based EGOFET for Protein (Streptavidin) Detection
Suspene et al. reported in 2013 on the sensing of streptavidin with an EGOFET using a copolymer of P3HT, P3HT-COOH and biotinylated P3HT (Figure 11A) as the active sensing and semiconducting material [93].The biotin-streptavidin couple was chosen as a proof-of-concept, for its extremely low dissociation constant.Non-specific interactions were reduced due to the presence of the COOH function; it was further reduced when the polymer surface was pretreated with 1-octanol, which interacted non-covalently with P3HT with its C 8 alkyl chain.In this case, human serum albumin had no effect on the transistor characteristics, whereas streptavidin led to a decrease of the drain current (Figure 11B).

P3HT-Based EGOFET for Protein (Streptavidin) Detection
Suspene et al. reported in 2013 on the sensing of streptavidin with an EGOFET using a copolymer of P3HT, P3HT-COOH and biotinylated P3HT (Figure 11A) as the active sensing and semiconducting material [93].The biotin-streptavidin couple was chosen as a proof-of-concept, for its extremely low dissociation constant.Non-specific interactions were reduced due to the presence of the COOH function; it was further reduced when the polymer surface was pretreated with 1-octanol, which interacted non-covalently with P3HT with its C8 alkyl chain.In this case, human serum albumin had no effect on the transistor characteristics, whereas streptavidin led to a decrease of the drain current (Figure 11B).In order to investigate the transduction mechanisms of such EGOFET devices, Palazzo et al. [30] investigated in 2014 the sensitivity of their EGOFET as a function of the Debye's length, the receptor charge, and the distance at which the binding event takes place.For this, they used biotin/avidin and antigen/antibody interactions (C-reactive protein CRP and anti-CRP, respectively).The sensor was shown to successfully detect binding events occurring at distances that are 30 times the Debye's length value from the transistor electronic channel, and even to deliver higher responses in the presence of high salt concentrations (Figure 12A).The sensitivity was not calculated, but the limit of detection was ca. 10 μg•mL −1 of CRP.Transduction of the molecular recognition was explained by capacitance changes at the electrolyte/OSC interface rather than by electrostatic effects of the charges carried by the target molecules (Figure 12B).In order to investigate the transduction mechanisms of such EGOFET devices, Palazzo et al. [30] investigated in 2014 the sensitivity of their EGOFET as a function of the Debye's length, the receptor charge, and the distance at which the binding event takes place.For this, they used biotin/avidin and antigen/antibody interactions (C-reactive protein CRP and anti-CRP, respectively).The sensor was shown to successfully detect binding events occurring at distances that are 30 times the Debye's length value from the transistor electronic channel, and even to deliver higher responses in the presence of high salt concentrations (Figure 12A).The sensitivity was not calculated, but the limit of detection was ca. 10 µg¨mL ´1 of CRP.Transduction of the molecular recognition was explained by capacitance changes at the electrolyte/OSC interface rather than by electrostatic effects of the charges carried by the target molecules (Figure 12B).In order to investigate the transduction mechanisms of such EGOFET devices, Palazzo et al. [30] investigated in 2014 the sensitivity of their EGOFET as a function of the Debye's length, the receptor charge, and the distance at which the binding event takes place.For this, they used biotin/avidin and antigen/antibody interactions (C-reactive protein CRP and anti-CRP, respectively).The sensor was shown to successfully detect binding events occurring at distances that are 30 times the Debye's length value from the transistor electronic channel, and even to deliver higher responses in the presence of high salt concentrations (Figure 12A).The sensitivity was not calculated, but the limit of detection was ca. 10 μg•mL −1 of CRP.Transduction of the molecular recognition was explained by capacitance changes at the electrolyte/OSC interface rather than by electrostatic effects of the charges carried by the target molecules (Figure 12B).

Non-Covalent Functionalization of the Semiconductor
Still with the objective to functionalize the semiconductor and impede its doping by ions present in the electrolyte, Cotrone et al. described a non-covalent approach using a phospholipid bilayer [93].They compared the electric performances of the EGOFET including a phospholipid film to those with the organic semiconductor directly in contact with the gating solution.Impedance spectroscopy was employed to show that this phospholipid bilayer minimizes the penetration of ions into the OSC thus improves the field-effect mode of operation and discriminates the electrochemical one.No bioprobes were immobilized on or into this bilayer but this work is a significant step toward EGOFETs biocompatibilization.
One year later [64], Magliulo et al. used biotin-labeled phospholipids, in order to form a streptavidin binding layer (Figure 13).They achieved detection with a LoD of 10 nM even in a high ionic strength solution.They attributed the sensing mechanism to the capacitive effect across the phospholipid bilayer, involving the charges carried by streptavidin.Because the biotinylated phospholipid can easily be functionalized with virtually any receptors, this work paved the way for immunosensors, capture antibodies usually being modified by streptavidin for hetergeneous ELISA immunoassay.

Non-Covalent Functionalization of the Semiconductor
Still with the objective to functionalize the semiconductor and impede its doping by ions present in the electrolyte, Cotrone et al. described a non-covalent approach using a phospholipid bilayer [93].They compared the electric performances of the EGOFET including a phospholipid film to those with the organic semiconductor directly in contact with the gating solution.Impedance spectroscopy was employed to show that this phospholipid bilayer minimizes the penetration of ions into the OSC thus improves the field-effect mode of operation and discriminates the electrochemical one.No bioprobes were immobilized on or into this bilayer but this work is a significant step toward EGOFETs biocompatibilization.
One year later [64], Magliulo et al. used biotin-labeled phospholipids, in order to form a streptavidin binding layer (Figure 13).They achieved detection with a LoD of 10 nM even in a high ionic strength solution.They attributed the sensing mechanism to the capacitive effect across the phospholipid bilayer, involving the charges carried by streptavidin.Because the biotinylated phospholipid can easily be functionalized with virtually any receptors, this work paved the way for immunosensors, capture antibodies usually being modified by streptavidin for hetergeneous ELISA immunoassay.

Non-Covalent Functionalization of the Semiconductor
Still with the objective to functionalize the semiconductor and impede its doping by ions present in the electrolyte, Cotrone et al. described a non-covalent approach using a phospholipid bilayer [93].They compared the electric performances of the EGOFET including a phospholipid film to those with the organic semiconductor directly in contact with the gating solution.Impedance spectroscopy was employed to show that this phospholipid bilayer minimizes the penetration of ions into the OSC thus improves the field-effect mode of operation and discriminates the electrochemical one.No bioprobes were immobilized on or into this bilayer but this work is a significant step toward EGOFETs biocompatibilization.
One year later [64], Magliulo et al. used biotin-labeled phospholipids, in order to form a streptavidin binding layer (Figure 13).They achieved detection with a LoD of 10 nM even in a high ionic strength solution.They attributed the sensing mechanism to the capacitive effect across the phospholipid bilayer, involving the charges carried by streptavidin.Because the biotinylated phospholipid can easily be functionalized with virtually any receptors, this work paved the way for immunosensors, capture antibodies usually being modified by streptavidin for hetergeneous ELISA immunoassay.

pBTTT-Based EGOFET for Protein (Streptavidin) Detection
Mulla et al. [76] reported a pBTTT-based EGOFET sensor for streptavidin detection.pBTTT was spin-coated on the device, then a layer of poly(acrylic acid) was spin-coated on the pBTTT layer to have carboxyl functionalities acting as anchoring sites for phospholipid bilayers.The proof-of-concept of the sensor was demonstrated with the streptavidin/biotin couple (Figure 14).

pBTTT-Based EGOFET for Protein (Streptavidin) Detection
Mulla et al. [76] reported a pBTTT-based EGOFET sensor for streptavidin detection.pBTTT was spin-coated on the device, then a layer of poly(acrylic acid) was spin-coated on the pBTTT layer to have carboxyl functionalities acting as anchoring sites for phospholipid bilayers.The proof-of-concept of the sensor was demonstrated with the streptavidin/biotin couple (Figure 14).Reproduced from [76] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Gate Functionalization
Casalini et al. [32] reported in 2013 a P3HT-based EGOFET biosensor for dopamine detection where a gold gate was used as the sensing area instead of the semiconductor.They modified the gate/electrolyte interface with a self-assembled monolayer of cysteamine and 4-formylphenyl boronic acid.This modified gate enabled the selective covalent binding of dopamine that, in turn, modulates both the work function of the gate electrode and the capacitance of the electrode/electrolyte double layer.The strong dependence of the EGOFET transfer curve upon  [76] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Gate Functionalization
Casalini et al. [32] reported in 2013 a P3HT-based EGOFET biosensor for dopamine detection where a gold gate was used as the sensing area instead of the semiconductor.They modified the gate/electrolyte interface with a self-assembled monolayer of cysteamine and 4-formylphenyl boronic acid.This modified gate enabled the selective covalent binding of dopamine that, in turn, modulates both the work function of the gate electrode and the capacitance of the electrode/electrolyte double layer.The strong dependence of the EGOFET transfer curve upon dopamine coupling at the gate electrode is a proof of its sensitivity to small changes in gate capacitance.For dopamine detection, the threshold voltage shift was of ca.50 mV for 0.1 nM dopamine.The selectivity of boronic acid for dopamine was supported by the fact that boronic acid is known to act as a Lewis acid for association with vicinal glycols such as sugars or catechol, via formation of a boronate ester.This reaction also works well on dopamine and is therefore specific, providing that no other vicinal diols are present in the analyzed sample (this reaction has been often reported in the literature dedicated to dopamine sensing since 2013).
Casalini et al. [105] published more recently another work using Au gate as sensing area, instead of the semiconductor, using thiol-modified protein G or a 6-aminohexanethiol (HSC 6 NH 2 ) self-assembled monolayer followed by covalent coupling (protein G was used here for its property to bind IgG antibodies).They found that the most sensitive EGOFET was obtained with the first (affinity) immobilization strategy.They explained this result by the best orientation of the antibodies on the gate surface, which they probed by force spectroscopy (Figure 15).The lowest concentration of antigen (interleukin, IL4) that was detected was ca. 5 nM.These results, and particularly the coupling between sensing experiments and surface characterizations, were very powerful to rationalize the response of an EGOFET using antibodies grafted on the gate.
Electronics 2016, 5, 9 15 of 23 dopamine coupling at the gate electrode is a proof of its sensitivity to small changes in gate capacitance.For dopamine detection, the threshold voltage shift was of ca.50 mV for 0.1 nM dopamine.The selectivity of boronic acid for dopamine was supported by the fact that boronic acid is known to act as a Lewis acid for association with vicinal glycols such as sugars or catechol, via formation of a boronate ester.This reaction also works well on dopamine and is therefore specific, providing that no other vicinal diols are present in the analyzed sample (this reaction has been often reported in the literature dedicated to dopamine sensing since 2013).Casalini et al. [105] published more recently another work using Au gate as sensing area, instead of the semiconductor, using thiol-modified protein G or a 6-aminohexanethiol (HSC6NH2) self-assembled monolayer followed by covalent coupling (protein G was used here for its property to bind IgG antibodies).They found that the most sensitive EGOFET was obtained with the first (affinity) immobilization strategy.They explained this result by the best orientation of the antibodies on the gate surface, which they probed by force spectroscopy (Figure 15).The lowest concentration of antigen (interleukin, IL4) that was detected was ca. 5 nM.These results, and particularly the coupling between sensing experiments and surface characterizations, were very powerful to rationalize the response of an EGOFET using antibodies grafted on the gate.Mulla et al. [77] also described an EGOFET where the gate was the sensing element.They immobilized proteins on the Au gate through a self-assembled monolayer and showed that the transduction capability of the device was governed by the capacitance of the gate/electrolyte interface.The authors applied this architecture to the detection of odorant molecules (Figure 16), by following drain current as a function of the target molecule concentration (carvone).The sensor presented a limit of detection estimated around 10 pM and was enantioselective.
Electronics 2016, 5, 9 16 of 23 Mulla et al. [77] also described an EGOFET where the gate was the sensing element.They immobilized proteins on the Au gate through a self-assembled monolayer and showed that the transduction capability of the device was governed by the capacitance of the gate/electrolyte interface.The authors applied this architecture to the detection of odorant molecules (Figure 16), by following drain current as a function of the target molecule concentration (carvone).The sensor presented a limit of detection estimated around 10 pM and was enantioselective.

Other Type of Electrolyte
More sophisticated electrolytes can be used in EGOFETs in order to maximize the capacitance changes upon a molecular recognition event.Even if their work has not been significantly cited yet, Lee et al. introduced this concept in 2013 [106].They used bovine serum albumin (BSA) as electrolyte, because BSA has good hydration ability, containing a high percentage of acidic and basic amino acid residues.They showed that, in dry state, BSA-gated pentacene OFETs exhibited a threshold voltage of ca.−16 V, whereas the VTH was reduced to −0.7 V under humid conditions.
Very recently, Dumitru et al. [107] used a pH-sensitive alginate hydrogel as electrolyte (Figure 17a,b), which is biocompatible and biodegradable.To demonstrate the efficiency of such hydrogels to host bioreceptor without damaging its bioactivity, glucose oxidase was entrapped into the alginate in order to make a biosensor.The enzyme activity, producing an acidification of the medium through transformation of glucose into gluconic acid, modified the gel swelling (polymer chains conformational switch) that lead to a capacitance modulation and therefore a field effect change (Figure 17e).The sensitivity toward glucose was not given.

Other Type of Electrolyte
More sophisticated electrolytes can be used in EGOFETs in order to maximize the capacitance changes upon a molecular recognition event.Even if their work has not been significantly cited yet, Lee et al. introduced this concept in 2013 [106].They used bovine serum albumin (BSA) as electrolyte, because BSA has good hydration ability, containing a high percentage of acidic and basic amino acid residues.They showed that, in dry state, BSA-gated pentacene OFETs exhibited a threshold voltage of ca.´16 V, whereas the V TH was reduced to ´0.7 V under humid conditions.
Very recently, Dumitru et al. [107] used a pH-sensitive alginate hydrogel as electrolyte (Figure 17a,b), which is biocompatible and biodegradable.To demonstrate the efficiency of such hydrogels to host bioreceptor without damaging its bioactivity, glucose oxidase was entrapped into the alginate in order to make a biosensor.The enzyme activity, producing an acidification of the medium through transformation of glucose into gluconic acid, modified the gel swelling (polymer chains conformational switch) that lead to a capacitance modulation and therefore a field effect change (Figure 17e).The sensitivity toward glucose was not given.

Use of Nanoparticles
The use of nanoparticles (NPs) has not been reported yet in EGOFET devices for biosensing.However, NPs have been extensively reported in other type of biosensors for years, mainly because NPs provide an extremely high surface-to-volume ratio, i.e., a high specific active area, which makes bioprobes more accessible than on a planar surface.In addition, because EGOFETs are sensitive to capacitance changes (a typical surface effect), NPs should be extremely pertinent in EGOFETs.As an example of what could be done, Poghossian et al., not in an organic-based but in a silicon-based device, reported a gating capacitive field-effect sensor [108] for detection of charged molecules using gold NPs to increase the capacitive effect (Figure 18).Bao's group also reported biodetection using a classical bottom-gate OFET decorated with gold nanoparticles, which were used to vary spacing between receptors [109].

Use of Nanoparticles
The use of nanoparticles (NPs) has not been reported yet in EGOFET devices for biosensing.However, NPs have been extensively reported in other type of biosensors for years, mainly because NPs provide an extremely high surface-to-volume ratio, i.e., a high specific active area, which makes bioprobes more accessible than on a planar surface.In addition, because EGOFETs are sensitive to capacitance changes (a typical surface effect), NPs should be extremely pertinent in EGOFETs.As an example of what could be done, Poghossian et al., not in an organic-based but in a silicon-based device, reported a gating capacitive field-effect sensor [108] for detection of charged molecules using gold NPs to increase the capacitive effect (Figure 18).Bao's group also reported biodetection using a classical bottom-gate OFET decorated with gold nanoparticles, which were used to vary spacing between receptors [109].

Conclusions and Outlooks
In this review, we presented recent advances in electrolyte-gated field-effect transistors applied for biosensors.EGOFETs rely on the accumulation of charges at the gate/dielectric and dielectric/semiconductor interfaces.The detection principles in EGOFETs are based on changes of these surface capacitances induced by the biological recognition between probe and target molecules.The electrolyte, which replaces the classical dielectric in EGOFET, fits well with biological processes (which generally take place in water), whereas it is less straightforward to apply regular dielectric-based OFETs for biosensing.There is still a lot of work to do to improve EGOFET-based biosensor's performances.The most challenging is certainly the stability of the semiconductors in water or neutral buffers, the immobilization of the bioprobes whether onto the gate or the semiconductor surface, and a better understanding of the operating principles for the design of more efficient transduction architectures.Concerning OSC, only few were used until now (P3HT, pBTTT, α-sexithiophene, and pentacene) and many others deserve to be investigated.Concerning immobilization, different methods were used to immobilize the biological probes on the sensing parts of EGOFETs, whether by covalent or non-covalent methods.Covalent bindings look to be more efficient on the gate, whereas non-covalent immobilizations are more convenient on the semiconductors because it avoids tedious chemical derivatization, which generally impedes the electrical performances of the OSC.Most biorecognition processes reported in the literature concern DNA hybridization, specific chemical couplings, DNA or peptide aptamers, antibody-antigen recognitions or other protein-protein interactions.Most of these methods involve capture of a free target in electrolyte onto a biological probe immobilized on a surface.However, an opposite way of thinking, inspired from competitive immunoassays, is also a promising approach, worth trying.At last, nanostructuration of gates or semiconductors should be investigated.

Conclusions and Outlooks
In this review, we presented recent advances in electrolyte-gated field-effect transistors applied for biosensors.EGOFETs rely on the accumulation of charges at the gate/dielectric and dielectric/semiconductor interfaces.The detection principles in EGOFETs are based on changes of these surface capacitances induced by the biological recognition between probe and target molecules.The electrolyte, which replaces the classical dielectric in EGOFET, fits well with biological processes (which generally take place in water), whereas it is less straightforward to apply regular dielectric-based OFETs for biosensing.There is still a lot of work to do to improve EGOFET-based biosensor's performances.The most challenging is certainly the stability of the semiconductors in water or neutral buffers, the immobilization of the bioprobes whether onto the gate or the semiconductor surface, and a better understanding of the operating principles for the design of more efficient transduction architectures.Concerning OSC, only few were used until now (P3HT, pBTTT, α-sexithiophene, and pentacene) and many others deserve to be investigated.Concerning immobilization, different methods were used to immobilize the biological probes on the sensing parts of EGOFETs, whether by covalent or non-covalent methods.Covalent bindings look to be more efficient on the gate, whereas non-covalent immobilizations are more convenient on the semiconductors because it avoids tedious chemical derivatization, which generally impedes the electrical performances of the OSC.Most biorecognition processes reported in the literature concern DNA hybridization, specific chemical couplings, DNA or peptide aptamers, antibody-antigen recognitions or other protein-protein interactions.Most of these methods involve capture of a free target in electrolyte onto a biological probe immobilized on a surface.However, an opposite way of thinking, inspired from competitive immunoassays, is also a promising approach, worth trying.At last, nanostructuration of gates or semiconductors should be investigated.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Illustration of the compact and diffuse layers corresponding to OFET and EGOFET, respectively.Adapted from [8] with kind permission from Springer Science+Business Media.© Springer-Verlag, 2011.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Illustration of the compact and diffuse layers corresponding to OFET and EGOFET, respectively.Adapted from [8] with kind permission from Springer Science+Business Media.© Springer-Verlag, 2011.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Illustration of the compact and diffuse layers corresponding to OFET and EGOFET, respectively.Adapted from [8] with kind permission from Springer Science+Business Media.© Springer-Verlag, 2011.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. (a) Schematic drawing of the transistor architecture and the different functionalizations investigated.(b) Transfer curves of untreated, oxidized and APTES-functionalized transistors, measured at pH 5. (c) Threshold voltage shift of untreated, APTES-functionalized and UV-oxidized α6T as a function of pH.(d) ID versus time, during a penicillin titration in PBS buffer.The green line corresponds to the response of a device functionalized with APTES and penicillinase, while the grey line depicts the ID response of an untreated α6T.Adapted from [11].Copyright © 2012, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. (a) Schematic drawing of the transistor architecture and the different functionalizations investigated.(b) Transfer curves of untreated, oxidized and APTES-functionalized transistors, measured at pH 5. (c) Threshold voltage shift of untreated, APTES-functionalized and UV-oxidized α6T as a function of pH.(d) I D versus time, during a penicillin titration in PBS buffer.The green line corresponds to the response of a device functionalized with APTES and penicillinase, while the grey line depicts the I D response of an untreated α6T.Adapted from [11].Copyright © 2012, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. (A) Schematic view of the EGOFET device.(B) Transfer characteristics after (a) immobilization of ODN probes and (b) a blank sample after soaking in a bath similar to (a) but without ODN.Transfer curves for hybridization with (c) a complementary target and (d) a random target.Transfer curves for (e) a complementary target and (f) a random target in water instead of PBS.Adapted from [70] with permission from Elsevier.Copyright © 2011, Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. (A) Schematic view of the EGOFET device.(B) Transfer characteristics after (a) immobilization of ODN probes and (b) a blank sample after soaking in a bath similar to (a) but without ODN.Transfer curves for hybridization with (c) a complementary target and (d) a random target.Transfer curves for (e) a complementary target and (f) a random target in water instead of PBS.Adapted from [70] with permission from Elsevier.Copyright © 2011, Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Figure 14 .
Figure 14.(A) Schematic illustration of the fabrication process of an EGOFET biosensor: (a) after deposition of pBTTT on the substrate; (b) poly(acrylic acid) coating spin-coated and cross-linked; (c) biotinylated phospholipids anchored on the PAA coating; and (d) EGOFET configuration comprising a gold gate electrode and a droplet of PBS as dielectric.(B) (a) IDS-VG transfer curves in PBS, pH 7.4 (line), and streptavidin solutions at concentrations of 0.16 nM (circles) and 1.6 μM (triangles) in PBS; and (b) relative response of the EGOFET as a function of the streptavidin concentration.Reproduced from [76] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 14 .
Figure 14.(A) Schematic illustration of the fabrication process of an EGOFET biosensor: (a) after deposition of pBTTT on the substrate; (b) poly(acrylic acid) coating spin-coated and cross-linked; (c) biotinylated phospholipids anchored on the PAA coating; and (d) EGOFET configuration comprising a gold gate electrode and a droplet of PBS as dielectric.(B) (a) I DS -V G transfer curves in PBS, pH 7.4 (line), and streptavidin solutions at concentrations of 0.16 nM (circles) and 1.6 µM (triangles) in PBS; and (b) relative response of the EGOFET as a function of the streptavidin concentration.Reproduced from [76] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 15 .
Figure 15.(A) Schematic illustration of the gate-modified EGOFET, and of the AFM measurements.(B) I-V transfer characteristics for (a) HSC6NH2-and (b) Protein G-based protocols.Normalized mobility ratio (c) and threshold voltage (d) trends corresponding to the stepwise functionalization.Adapted with permission from [105].Copyright © 2015, American Chemical Society.

Figure 15 .
Figure 15.(A) Schematic illustration of the gate-modified EGOFET, and of the AFM measurements.(B) I-V transfer characteristics for (a) HSC 6 NH 2 -and (b) Protein G-based protocols.Normalized mobility ratio (c) and threshold voltage (d) trends corresponding to the stepwise functionalization.Adapted with permission from [105].Copyright © 2015, American Chemical Society.

Figure 16 .
Figure 16.EGOFET where the gate is modified by a SAM of odorant binding protein (pOBP-SAM).(a) Schematic structure.The OSC is pBTTT-C14.(b) pOBP protein structure and interaction with the odorant molecule.(c) IDS-VG transfer characteristics reported as a function to concentrations of the odorant molecule (carvone).(d) Calibration curves for the (R)-(−)-and (S)-(+)-carvone and for a non-specific molecule.Reproduced from [77] under Creative Commons Attribution license.

Figure 16 .
Figure 16.EGOFET where the gate is modified by a SAM of odorant binding protein (pOBP-SAM).(a) Schematic structure.The OSC is pBTTT-C14.(b) pOBP protein structure and interaction with the odorant molecule.(c) I DS -V G transfer characteristics reported as a function to concentrations of the odorant molecule (carvone).(d) Calibration curves for the (R)-(´)-and (S)-(+)-carvone and for a non-specific molecule.Reproduced from [77] under Creative Commons Attribution license.

Figure 17 .
Figure 17.Schematic illustration (a) and picture (b) of the alginate-gated OFET; output characteristics (c) and transfer curves (d); and (e) IDS changes versus time, for injection of water (blank) and glucose.Reproduced from [107] under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.

Figure 17 .
Figure 17.Schematic illustration (a) and picture (b) of the alginate-gated OFET; output characteristics (c) and transfer curves (d); and (e) I DS changes versus time, for injection of water (blank) and glucose.Reproduced from [107] under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.

Figure 18 .
Figure 18.Schematic of (a) a capacitive Al/p-Si/SiO 2 sensor after silanization; (b) deposition of negatively charged citrate-capped AuNPs (b); and (c) adsorption of positively charged molecules on the AuNPs.(d) Capacitance vs. gate voltage curves.Reproduced from [108] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Table 1 .
[70]uence of probe grafting and target hybridization on device performance with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) as electrolyte, and influence of probe hybridization with water as electrolyte.Adapted from[70]with permission from Elsevier.Copyright © 2011, Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Table 1 .
[70]uence of probe grafting and target hybridization on device performance with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) as electrolyte, and influence of probe hybridization with water as electrolyte.Adapted from[70]with permission from Elsevier.Copyright © 2011, Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Schmoltner et al. reported an EGOFET based on P3HT for which they investigated the effect of the gate material (as in ref.