Next Article in Journal
Identification of Static Eccentricity and Load Current Unbalance via Space Vector Stray Flux in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generators
Next Article in Special Issue
OptiPerformer as a Platform for Optical Fiber System Simulation in Distance and In-Class Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Zhao et al. A Performing Arts ICH-Driven Interaction Design Framework for Rehabilitation Games. Electronics 2025, 14, 3739
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Study on Exploiting Temporal Patterns in Semester Records for Efficient Student Dropout Prediction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Towards a Unified Digital Ecosystem: The Role of Platform Technology Convergence

1
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea
3
Department of AI and Software, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2025, 14(24), 4787; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14244787
Submission received: 14 October 2025 / Revised: 4 December 2025 / Accepted: 4 December 2025 / Published: 5 December 2025

Abstract

The rapid evolution of platform technologies is transforming industries, interoperability, and innovation. Despite numerous studies on individual technologies, no prior review unifies AI, IoT, blockchain, and 5G with cross-sector standards, governance, and technical enablers to provide a comprehensive view of platform convergence. This narrative review synthesizes conceptual and technical literature from 2015–2025, focusing on how converging platform technologies interact across sectors. The review organizes findings by technological enablers, cross-domain integration mechanisms, sector-specific applications, and emergent trends, highlighting systemic synergies and challenges. The study demonstrates that AI, IoT, blockchain, cloud-edge architectures, and advanced communication networks collectively enable interoperable, secure, and adaptive ecosystems. Key enablers include standardized protocols, edge–cloud orchestration, and cross-platform data sharing, while challenges involve cybersecurity, regulatory compliance, and scalability. Sectoral examples span healthcare, finance, manufacturing, smart cities, and autonomous systems. Platform convergence offers transformative potential for sustainable and intelligent systems. Critical research gaps remain in unified architectures, privacy-preserving AI and blockchain mechanisms, and dynamic orchestration of heterogeneous systems. Emerging technologies such as quantum computing and federated learning are poised to further strengthen collaborative ecosystems. This review provides actionable insights for researchers, policymakers, and industry leaders aiming to harness platform convergence for innovation and sustainable development.

1. Introduction

The rapid emergence of diverse platform technologies is driving transformative changes in digital ecosystems and industrial innovation. Technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), blockchain, cloud computing, and advanced communication networks (5G/6G) are increasingly converging to form integrated, intelligent systems [1]. Rather than functioning in isolation, these technologies interact synergistically, enabling collaborative decision-making, adaptive operations, and sustainable growth across multiple domains. This phenomenon, referred to as platform convergence, is reshaping traditional business models, creating new value chains, and promoting innovation in areas including healthcare, finance, manufacturing, smart cities, and autonomous systems.

1.1. Background and Significance

Digital systems today increasingly rely on the integration of heterogeneous platforms, forming interconnected ecosystems that require interoperability, coordinated intelligence, and resilient architectures. While technologies such as AI, IoT, blockchain, cloud computing, and advanced networking each play critical roles [2], existing literature largely examines them in isolation or within narrow sector-specific contexts. However, no prior review provides a unified treatment of how communication standards, edge–cloud frameworks, data governance models, and trust mechanisms must align to enable true cross-sector platform convergence. Addressing this gap, this work offers a structured synthesis that clarifies integration mechanisms, emerging interactions, and multi-domain implications.
Platform convergence represents more than the coexistence of multiple technologies; it involves dynamic coupling among heterogeneous systems with complementary functions and shared data flows. From a systems perspective, such coupling can produce emergent behaviors where the combined system exhibits capabilities that exceed the sum of individual components. For example, AI-enabled IoT systems support predictive analytics and adaptive control, while blockchain contributes tamper-evident auditability and decentralized coordination. Yet these technologies must be carefully orchestrated: AI models may introduce opacity and bias, and blockchain alone cannot authenticate data origin. Their combination therefore requires principled governance to avoid amplifying systemic risks rather than mitigating them. Similarly, cloud and edge computing architectures enable distributed intelligence, but also create challenges of task allocation, latency management, and conflict resolution in multi-agent environments [3,4]. Understanding these interactions is essential for analyzing functional complementarity, data interdependence, and system-level coupling.
The convergence of platform technologies also underpins Industry 5.0 initiatives, emphasizing human-centric, sustainable, and personalized digital services. By harmonizing formerly siloed technologies, platform convergence enables more intelligent, resilient, and equitable systems that support the global digital economy [5]. Clarifying its mechanisms, challenges, and opportunities is therefore critical for guiding future research, technological deployment, and policy formulation.

1.2. Key Drivers of Collaborative Innovation

The convergence of AI, IoT, blockchain, cloud–edge architectures, and advanced networking is ultimately shaped by deeper economic, societal, and operational forces rather than by technological evolution alone. Economically, organizations increasingly pursue interoperable platforms to reduce integration overheads, enable shared service ecosystems, and support new value-creation models such as data marketplaces, pay-per-use intelligence, and cross-sector platform services. Societal expectations for resilience, sustainability, transparency, and real-time responsiveness further incentivize architectures capable of seamless data exchange, coordinated automation, and trustworthy decision-making across domains such as healthcare, mobility, manufacturing, and public safety. Regulation also plays a growing role, as requirements for traceability, privacy protection, and auditable automation encourage the adoption of unified, governance-aware platforms.
Operational pressures form a third major driver. Modern systems generate heterogeneous, high-volume data that must be processed, secured, and acted upon across distributed environments. This creates demand for platforms that combine sensing, computation, storage, analytics, and trust management within cohesive workflows. As digital infrastructures grow more interdependent, cross-domain orchestration—linking cyber, physical, and human actors—becomes essential for managing uncertainty, preventing subsystem conflicts, and maintaining service continuity.
Together, these economic, societal, and operational drivers—not data growth or computing power alone—explain why platform convergence represents a structural shift toward integrated, adaptive, and collaborative ecosystems. Technologies such as AI, blockchain, and cloud–edge computing serve as the means through which these motivations are realized. Their integration enables applications ranging from personalized healthcare and autonomous mobility to predictive manufacturing and secure multi-stakeholder collaboration, highlighting how broader forces shape the need for unified, cross-domain platform innovation.

1.3. Objectives of the Review

Despite the benefits of convergence, realizing a fully integrated platform ecosystem remains complex due to interoperability challenges, data governance, cybersecurity risks, ethical concerns, and inconsistent regulatory frameworks. Fragmented standards and heterogeneous implementations across industries further complicate adoption.
The primary objective of this narrative review is to provide a systems-level understanding of converging platform technologies, emphasizing collaborative innovations, interaction mechanisms, technical enablers, and emerging trends. Specifically, the paper provides:
  • A timeline of platform convergence illustrating the evolution and integration of core technologies.
  • A standards and frameworks map supporting cross-sector interoperability.
  • A governance lens addressing trust, privacy, and regulatory compliance across domains.
  • A research agenda highlighting emerging directions for AI, blockchain, and edge–cloud orchestration.
  • A synthesis of technical enablers, sector-specific applications, and emerging trends guiding future innovation.
Given the conceptual and cross-disciplinary nature of platform convergence across AI, IoT, cybersecurity, distributed systems, and communication networks, a narrative review methodology is adopted. Unlike systematic reviews that aggregate empirical evidence using predefined protocols, this study synthesizes technological perspectives, identifies cross-domain patterns, and analyzes emergent trends. Figure 1 depicts the structure of this review, and Section 2 details the methodology.
The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: Section 2 describes the literature selection criteria. Section 3 explores fundamental concepts and integration mechanisms of key platform technologies. Section 4 reviews collaborative innovations across industries. Section 5 discusses technical enablers supporting seamless convergence. Section 6 addresses challenges including security, regulation, and scalability. Section 7 presents emerging trends and future research directions. Finally, conclusions are drawn regarding implications for academia, industry, and policy development.

2. Review Methodology

This work employs a narrative review methodology, focusing on synthesizing conceptual and technological developments rather than systematically aggregating empirical evidence. Given the interdisciplinary, dynamic, and multi-layered nature of platform convergence—encompassing AI, IoT, blockchain, edge–cloud computing, networking, and cybersecurity—a narrative approach is more appropriate than a systematic or scoping review. No new experimental data are presented; instead, the emphasis is on conceptual integration, technological interactions, and the identification of emergent system behaviors.

2.1. Literature Search Strategy

Relevant literature was collected from major scholarly databases, including IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, MDPI, and Wiley Online Library. The search utilized Boolean combinations of keywords such as “platform convergence”, “interoperability frameworks”, “cross-platform integration”, “IoT–AI synergy”, “middleware architectures”, “edge–cloud systems”, “blockchain interoperability”, “5G/6G platforms”, “cyber-physical systems”, and “complex systems integration”. The search considered publications from 2015 to 2025, while earlier foundational studies were included to provide historical context and conceptual grounding.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The review includes literature that:
  • Discusses technologies, architectures, or frameworks contributing to platform convergence;
  • Presents models or mechanisms for interoperability, integration, and cross-domain interaction;
  • Explores systemic properties, emergent behaviors, or synergistic effects of convergent technologies;
  • Reports cross-domain use cases, conceptual frameworks, or insights informing future research directions.
Studies were excluded if they:
  • Focused solely on isolated, domain-specific technologies without cross-platform relevance;
  • Addressed only hardware-level implementation details without systemic implications;
  • Presented new experimental datasets, empirical measurements, or prototype evaluations;
  • Were systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or scoping reviews lacking conceptual synthesis.

2.3. Synthesis Approach

A thematic and systems-oriented synthesis was employed to organize the literature. Recurring concepts were identified and grouped into the following thematic areas:
  • Technological enablers and systemic interactions within platform convergence;
  • Architectural and interoperability frameworks supporting cross-domain integration;
  • Mechanisms of technological synergy, including functional complementarity, data interlocking, and process embedding;
  • Use case insights demonstrating emergent properties and practical impacts across industries;
  • Challenges, systemic gaps, and future research opportunities.
This iterative, thematic synthesis enabled identification of conceptual relationships, dependencies, and emergent systemic behaviors, aligning with a systems science perspective.

2.4. Rationale for a Narrative Review

A narrative review was chosen due to the conceptual, interdisciplinary, and rapidly evolving nature of platform convergence. Unlike systematic or scoping reviews, which follow strict protocols optimized for empirical data aggregation, this review focuses on cross-domain synthesis, integration mechanisms, and the identification of emergent systemic effects. This approach enables critical analysis, highlights technological interdependencies, and identifies research gaps across technical, governance, and ecosystem dimensions. By clearly reporting the literature search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the synthesis approach, the review ensures transparency and reproducibility appropriate for a narrative review.

3. Fundamental Concepts of Platform Technologies

The concept of platform convergence is rooted in the integration of multiple digital technologies that collectively enable intelligent, interconnected, and adaptive systems. Artificial Intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), blockchain, cloud computing, and 5G each contribute distinct functionalities—intelligence, sensing, trust, computation, and connectivity—creating synergistic effects that go beyond simple aggregation. Understanding these technologies and their interactions from a systems perspective is essential to comprehending how convergence facilitates innovation, scalability, and resilience across domains.

3.1. Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence (AI) serves as the cognitive layer in convergent platforms, enabling autonomous decision-making, pattern recognition, and predictive analytics. AI interacts with IoT by processing sensor data, with blockchain by validating and analyzing secure transactions, and with cloud-edge systems by optimizing distributed computation. This functional complementarity allows emergent capabilities, such as predictive maintenance across heterogeneous devices and federated learning across organizational boundaries, where multiple AI models collaborate without exposing sensitive data [6]. From a systems theory perspective, AI acts as both a central controller and an adaptive agent, enabling dynamic feedback loops and emergent behaviors across the integrated ecosystem.

3.2. Internet of Things

The Internet of Things (IoT) provides the physical interface for data acquisition, connectivity, and actuation. IoT devices generate continuous streams of heterogeneous data, which are integrated through edge-cloud infrastructures. In convergence ecosystems, IoT enables process embedding: AI models interpret sensor data in real time, blockchain ensures secure logging of events, and cloud services provide high-level coordination. This data interlocking produces systemic effects such as enhanced situational awareness and adaptive system behaviors. For example, in healthcare, IoT-based monitoring combined with AI prediction and blockchain auditing enables both personalized care and regulatory compliance [7].

3.3. Blockchain Technology

Blockchain ensures data integrity, trust, and transparency within multi-stakeholder ecosystems. Beyond storing transactions, it embeds governance and verification mechanisms into operational processes. When combined with AI and IoT, blockchain facilitates decentralized intelligence: distributed consensus ensures reliable decision-making across autonomous agents, and smart contracts coordinate tasks between devices and services. From a complex systems perspective, blockchain introduces nonlinearity and robustness into the ecosystem, creating emergent properties such as trust-enhanced collaborative networks and resilient supply chains.

3.4. Cloud and Edge Computing

Cloud and edge computing together form the backbone for distributed computation, data storage, and orchestration. Edge nodes perform localized processing, enabling low-latency decision-making, while cloud platforms handle large-scale analytics, model training, and cross-system coordination. The interaction between edge and cloud illustrates process embedding: tasks are dynamically allocated based on system load, network conditions, and data sensitivity. This collaboration generates emergent systemic properties, such as self-optimizing workflows and adaptive resource allocation, which would not arise from isolated computing layers [8].

3.5. 5G and Next-Generation Connectivity

5G networks provide ultra-reliable, low-latency communication that interlinks AI, IoT, blockchain, and cloud components into cohesive ecosystems. Network slicing and quality-of-service guarantees allow the creation of virtualized sub-networks tailored to specific industrial requirements, such as real-time manufacturing control or remote healthcare monitoring. The connectivity layer enables multi-agent interactions, supporting complex orchestration and adaptive behaviors across heterogeneous systems [9]. Future 6G networks are expected to further enhance these systemic interactions by supporting higher device densities, immersive XR experiences, and integrated sensing-communication frameworks.

3.6. Interoperability and Cross-Platform Integration

Interoperability enables heterogeneous systems to exchange, interpret, and act upon data seamlessly. Achieving this requires functional complementarity, standardized protocols, semantic frameworks, and middleware orchestration. Beyond standard solutions, advanced approaches such as AI-based adaptive interfaces, decentralized identifiers (DIDs), and ontology-driven data translation are emerging to overcome vendor lock-in and siloed architectures. Effective interoperability transforms fragmented digital ecosystems into intelligent, self-organizing environments where AI, IoT, blockchain, and cloud-edge components collaborate dynamically [10].

3.7. Cross-Industry Insights and Systemic Implications

The convergence of platform technologies manifests differently across industries, shaped by domain-specific performance constraints, governance requirements, and risk conditions. For example:
  • Healthcare: Real-time patient monitoring requires ultra-low latency, strict privacy compliance, and adaptive AI-driven analytics. These demands encourage edge–cloud coordination, federated learning, and blockchain-based auditability to maintain trust and data integrity.
  • Manufacturing: IoT-enabled smart factories depend on high-throughput, deterministic communication and predictive maintenance across heterogeneous machinery. AI-optimized scheduling, digital twins, and closed-loop control systems enable rapid reconfiguration and reduced downtime.
  • Finance: Convergence centers on data security, transaction immutability, explainable AI-driven risk analysis, and compliance automation. Blockchain and AI complement one another by enhancing fraud detection, auditability, and cross-institutional trust.
This cross-industry comparison demonstrates that convergence is not uniform: sectoral differences in privacy, latency tolerance, regulatory frameworks, and resilience requirements shape how technologies integrate and co-evolve. Failure cases—such as IoT deployments hampered by insufficient edge capacity, blockchain systems introducing latency that undermines real-time AI workflows, or interoperability breakdowns arising from incompatible ontologies—highlight the need for domain-sensitive integration strategies and governance-aware design principles.
In summary, platform convergence represents more than the aggregation of discrete technologies; it constitutes an interconnected, adaptive ecosystem exhibiting emergent properties. Functional complementarity, process embedding, and data interlocking remain central mechanisms through which convergence generates systemic benefits, including improved adaptability, resilience, and intelligent coordination. These foundational insights establish the conceptual groundwork for Section 4, which examines collaborative innovations and industry applications.
Converging platform technologies inherently increase system complexity due to multi-layer interactions across sensing, communication, computation, and governance layers. Effective complexity management relies on three coordinated mechanisms. First, architectural decomposition—through microservices, digital twins, and layered reference models—localizes complexity and enables modular evolution. Second, adaptive orchestration supported by AI-driven workload prediction, semantic mediation, and intent-based networking dynamically harmonizes heterogeneous components while minimizing latency propagation. Third, governance-level controls, such as policy abstraction, zero-trust security, and verifiable interoperability standards, ensure predictable behavior even as subsystems evolve autonomously. Together, these mechanisms enable convergent platforms to manage heterogeneity, uncertainty, and feedback loops, ensuring scalability and resilience across industries.

4. Collaborative Innovations and Industry Applications

This section synthesizes the recent literature on converging platform technologies and their applications across sectors. Table 1 summarizes the selected studies.

4.1. Healthcare

Recent studies highlight the convergence of IoT, AI, and cloud technologies in healthcare systems to enable continuous, data-driven patient monitoring [11]. Wearable devices, biosensors, and connected medical platforms generate multimodal data analyzed through deep learning models to detect anomalies and predict disease progression [12,13]. Edge computing reduces latency in emergency response, while blockchain ensures secure and tamper-proof medical record sharing. Integrating interoperable standards like HL7 and FHIR further enhances data portability across healthcare institutions. However, challenges persist in handling privacy-sensitive data, ensuring model interpretability, and achieving real-time cross-platform synchronization. Future research directions focus on federated learning, privacy-preserving AI models, and standardization frameworks for scalable healthcare interoperability.
Despite promising advancements, several healthcare convergence initiatives have encountered failures due to fragmentation and resource constraints. Many IoT-based hospital deployments have collapsed under insufficient edge resources, leading to delayed analytics and unreliable monitoring during peak loads. Similarly, blockchain-enabled medical record systems have failed pilot evaluations when consensus delays created latency incompatible with emergency workflows. Attempts to integrate AI diagnostics with EHR platforms have also been hindered by inconsistent data schemas and poor interoperability across hospital vendors. These failures highlight the need for standardization, robust edge provisioning, and governance frameworks tailored to clinical time-sensitivity and safety-critical decision-making.

4.2. Finance

The financial sector demonstrates strong adoption of converging platform technologies to improve transaction security, risk assessment, and personalized services. Blockchain, AI-driven analytics, and edge-cloud integration form the backbone of digital finance ecosystems. Smart contracts automate operations with minimal human intervention, while machine learning models enhance fraud detection, portfolio optimization, and customer segmentation. Cloud-based APIs and interoperable fintech platforms facilitate real-time collaboration between banks, insurers, and third-party providers. Nevertheless, cross-border regulatory differences, data privacy issues, and explainability of AI models remain pressing concerns. Ongoing research explores decentralized finance (DeFi) architectures, zero-knowledge proof systems, and hybrid blockchain models to enable transparent yet compliant digital finance convergence.
In the financial sector, several cross-platform convergence efforts have failed due to misaligned trust models and regulatory constraints. Early blockchain–AI fraud-detection systems failed when immutable but noisy transaction data amplified model bias, generating persistent false positives. Attempts to integrate IoT-based asset-tracking with banking platforms were abandoned when heterogeneous device identities could not satisfy Know-Your-Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money-Laundering (AML) requirements. Additionally, cloud–edge hybrid trading architectures have experienced instability during volatile markets due to unpredictable edge node behavior. These cases illustrate that financial convergence demands stringent data provenance mechanisms, regulatory alignment, and resilience against systemic risk propagation.

4.3. Manufacturing

Industry 4.0 represents the manufacturing domain’s most prominent convergence of IoT, robotics, and cyber–physical systems (CPS). Smart factories leverage sensor-rich environments, digital twins, and predictive analytics to achieve adaptive production and zero-downtime maintenance. Cloud–edge synergy supports distributed intelligence, allowing localized decision-making while maintaining centralized control and monitoring. Integration with 5G and AI-driven process optimization has accelerated mass customization and flexible automation. Despite these advances, interoperability among legacy systems, high data transmission costs, and cybersecurity risks hinder seamless platform convergence. Current research focuses on open manufacturing data models, blockchain-enabled supply chains, and self-optimizing production networks.
Several smart manufacturing initiatives have reported failures arising from poorly coordinated cyber–physical integration. IoT deployments on factory floors have failed when wireless interference or insufficient edge processing caused sensor dropouts, leading to inaccurate digital twins. Blockchain-based supply chain pilots have been discontinued when verification overhead slowed high-frequency production workflows. AI-driven predictive maintenance systems have also underperformed when heterogeneous machine data lacked common semantics, leading to model drift and unreliable forecasts. These failures demonstrate the need for harmonized data standards, low-latency verification models, and adaptive orchestration across cyber–physical systems.

4.4. Smart Cities

Smart city initiatives epitomize the concept of platform convergence by integrating IoT sensors, AI analytics, and cloud-edge computing to manage energy, transport, and public safety systems [14]. Converged infrastructures enable real-time traffic control, adaptive street lighting, and predictive maintenance of utilities. Data fusion from heterogeneous platforms enhances situational awareness and supports data-driven policy decisions. Furthermore, interoperability standards and open-data platforms foster citizen engagement and third-party innovation. Nonetheless, technical heterogeneity, limited scalability, and privacy regulations challenge large-scale adoption. Emerging research explores digital twins of urban systems, federated sensor networks, and AI-driven urban data governance to achieve sustainable and interoperable smart city ecosystems [15].
Smart city deployments frequently encounter failures due to large-scale heterogeneity and governance misalignment. Several sensor network programs have collapsed after integrating thousands of devices without adequate authentication, enabling cascading security breaches. AI-based traffic management systems have failed when imbalanced or siloed municipal datasets produced unstable or biased routing recommendations. Blockchain-based citizen identity pilots have been discontinued in some municipalities due to public resistance and slow transaction throughput. These cases emphasize that smart city convergence requires robust identity management, multi-stakeholder governance, and data harmonization across public agencies.
Table 1. Summary of key research papers.
Table 1. Summary of key research papers.
Short TitleAim of PaperResearch FindingsConclusion
AI-driven IoT anomaly detection [16]Survey methods for detecting anomalies in IoT streams using AICompared ML and DL models; deep models show higher detection rates but need more dataDeep learning improves detection but requires edge/cloud orchestration and labeled data.
Federated-learning for cross-device privacy [17]Explore federated learning for privacy-preserving model training across devicesDemonstrates reduced data sharing; performance close to centralized training with careful aggregationFederated learning is promising for private collaboration but needs robust aggregation and communication strategies.
Blockchain-enabled supply chain traceability [18]Assess blockchain for tamper-proof supply-chain recordsShows improved traceability and auditability; latency and scalability issues notedBlockchain enhances trust but requires integration with IoT and scalable consensus mechanisms.
Edge-AI for real-time control [19]Evaluate edge deployment of AI for low-latency control tasksEdge inference reduces latency and bandwidth usage; model compression criticalEdge-AI enables real-time control when combined with model optimization and orchestration.
5G network slicing for industrial IoT [20]Investigate network slicing to satisfy diverse QoS in IIoTSlicing supports heterogeneous QoS; orchestration complexity is nontrivialNetwork slicing enables tailored services but requires automated orchestration and standardization.
Digital-twin for predictive maintenance [21]Review digital twin approaches for equipment health monitoringDigital twins improve prediction and simulation fidelity with sensor fusionDigital twins provide effective predictive maintenance when paired with real-time data and model calibration.
Decentralized identity for device authentication [22]Propose decentralized identity schemes for IoT devicesDecentralized identity improves authentication resilience; key management remains a challengeDecentralized identity increases trust but needs scalable key and credential management.
Cross-platform data interoperability frameworks [23]Survey frameworks for semantic interoperability between platformsOntology-based and middleware solutions improve semantic alignment; heterogeneity remainsInteroperability frameworks mitigate data mismatch but require community standards.
Federated analytics for healthcare data [24]Evaluate federated analytics for multi-site health researchEnables collaborative analytics without sharing raw data; heterogeneity affects model performanceFederated analytics supports privacy-preserving research with careful normalization.
Privacy-preserving ML with differential privacy [25]Examine DP methods in collaborative ML pipelinesDP mitigates leakage but reduces model utility depending on epsilonDifferential privacy is effective but requires balancing privacy budget and performance.
AI-augmented blockchain smart contracts [26]Explore integrating AI with smart contracts for adaptive workflowsAI can inform smart contract triggers; trust and verification are issuesAI-smart-contract integration can enable adaptive automation but needs verifiable AI outputs.
Energy-efficient edge orchestration [27]Investigate strategies to reduce energy in edge-cloud systemsTask placement and lightweight models significantly reduce energy footprintEnergy-aware orchestration is essential for sustainable converged platforms.
Adaptive QoS for multi-access networks [28]Study adaptive QoS algorithms across 5G/Wi-Fi coexistenceDynamic QoS allocation improves user experience under variable loadsCross-access QoS adaptation enhances service continuity in heterogeneous networks.
Interoperable middleware for smart cities [29]Review middleware enabling cross-domain city servicesMiddleware eases integration of sensors and services; governance gaps persistMiddleware supports cross-domain applications but requires governance and data policies.
Secure OTA updates for distributed devices [30]Propose secure over-the-air update mechanisms for fleetsSigned updates and rollback mechanisms reduce compromise risk; supply-chain threats remainSecure OTA is necessary for large deployments but must secure the update pipeline end-to-end.
Multi-agent coordination in autonomous systems [31]Survey coordination protocols for multi-agent autonomyDecentralized protocols scale better; communication constraints limit performanceDecentralized coordination is viable with robust local policies and intermittent comms.
Knowledge graphs for cross-domain integration [32]Assess knowledge graphs to link heterogeneous datasetsKnowledge graphs improve semantic linking and querying; maintenance is intensiveKnowledge graphs facilitate interoperability but require curation and schema alignment.
Hybrid cloud-edge architectures for latency-critical apps [33]Evaluate hybrid architectures for delay-sensitive servicesHybrid setups balance training vs. inference load; orchestration complexity notedHybrid cloud-edge is effective for latency-critical tasks with flexible orchestration.
Trust management in decentralized IoT networks [34]Analyze trust frameworks for device collaborationReputation and blockchain-based trust improve decision-making; Sybil attacks remain a concernTrust frameworks help but need Sybil-resistant identity and lightweight metrics.
AI-assisted resource allocation in 5G [35]Study AI methods to optimize 5G resource schedulingReinforcement learning improves allocation under dynamics; training cost is highAI-driven schedulers can outperform heuristics if training and generalization are addressed.
Data governance models for platform ecosystems [36]Survey governance strategies for multi-stakeholder data sharingRole-based and policy-driven models enable control; enforcement remains hardStrong governance combines technical controls with legal and organizational policies.
Robust sensor fusion for autonomous mobility [37]Review sensor fusion techniques for reliable perceptionMulti-sensor fusion increases robustness under occlusion/noiseSensor fusion is critical for autonomy but requires synchronization and calibration.
Explainable AI in collaborative platforms [38]Explore XAI techniques for multi-stakeholder systemsPost-hoc and inherently interpretable models help trust; tradeoffs with accuracy existXAI increases transparency but must be tailored to stakeholder needs and regulatory contexts.
Scalable consensus for IoT-blockchain systems [39]Investigate lightweight consensus mechanisms for constrained devicesLightweight consensus reduces resource cost but may weaken security guaranteesScalable consensus designs are needed for practical blockchain+IoT deployments.
Cross-domain transfer learning for heterogeneous data [40]Evaluate transfer learning across different domains and sensorsTransfer improves performance with limited labels but risk of negative transferCross-domain transfer is beneficial when domain shifts are carefully managed.
Federated optimization under non-iid data [41]Study optimization methods for federated settings with heterogeneous dataPersonalized models and adaptive aggregation mitigate non-iid effectsFederated optimization must address heterogeneity via personalization and robust aggregation.
Resilience engineering for converged cyber-physical systems [42]Review resilience strategies against faults and attacksRedundancy and adaptive reconfiguration improve resilience; cost is a factorResilience requires design-time and run-time mechanisms across layers.
Semantic interoperability for healthcare platforms [43]Assess semantic standards for health-data exchangeStandard vocabularies (e.g., FHIR) aid interoperability; legacy systems impede adoptionSemantic standards speed integration but require adoption incentives and tooling.
Privacy-aware edge analytics architectures [44]Propose architectures that protect privacy in edge analyticsLocal aggregation and encryption reduce exposure; utility depends on designPrivacy-aware edge designs are feasible with hybrid cryptographic and ML techniques.
Quantum-resistant cryptography for platform security [45]Explore post-quantum cryptography for future-proof platformsPQC algorithms offer resistance but carry performance/size overheadsEarly migration planning for PQC is advisable while balancing performance impact.
Multi-modal sensing for smart environments [46]Survey multi-modal sensing fusion for context-aware servicesCombining modalities improves accuracy and context recognitionMulti-modal sensing enables richer services but raises synchronization and privacy concerns.
Quantum Computing Platforms Integration [47]To explore the role of quantum platforms in converging data processing frameworks.Demonstrated how quantum acceleration enhances cross-platform computational efficiency.Future convergence will rely on hybrid quantum-classical architectures.
Secure Blockchain Interoperability Framework [48]To develop a framework ensuring trust and transparency in interoperable systems.Showed that blockchain can ensure verifiable cross-platform data exchange.Emphasized combining blockchain with AI to enhance platform trust.
Cloud-Edge Synergy in Smart Manufacturing [49]To investigate how edge computing complements cloud services in Industry 4.0.Found improved latency, energy efficiency, and scalability in hybrid deployments.Advocated adaptive cloud-edge orchestration for industrial convergence.
6G Converged Communication Architecture [50]To conceptualize a unified 6G architecture integrating IoT, AI, and edge networks.Proposed architecture enabling seamless data flow across digital ecosystems.Highlighted AI-driven orchestration as key for 6G platform convergence.
Interoperable Healthcare IoT Systems [51]To analyze interoperability challenges in multi-platform healthcare IoT.Identified semantic and protocol-level incompatibilities between devices.Suggested standardized APIs and middleware for healthcare data convergence.

4.5. Autonomous Systems

Convergence in autonomous systems spans robotics, drones, and autonomous vehicles, combining AI perception models, edge computing, and high-speed communication networks [52]. These systems rely on real-time sensor fusion from LiDAR, cameras, and radar for situational understanding and safe navigation. Collaborative control frameworks enable multi-agent coordination across platforms, improving efficiency and adaptability in dynamic environments. Integration with 5G and V2X communications further enhances responsiveness and connectivity [53,54]. However, cross-platform synchronization, robustness under uncertain conditions, and ethical decision frameworks remain open challenges. Future directions include lightweight AI inference, edge–cloud co-optimization, and explainable autonomy for safer, transparent, and interoperable autonomous ecosystems.
Autonomous systems face notable convergence failures arising from edge unpredictability and cross-platform coupling. Multi-agent drone fleets using AI–IoT–edge integration have failed during field trials when communication latency spikes caused coordination conflicts and unsafe trajectories. Blockchain-based vehicular trust systems have been tested but often abandoned because consensus latency was incompatible with real-time control loops. Furthermore, AI-based perception models deployed across heterogeneous robotic platforms have exhibited inconsistent behaviour due to mismatched calibration and non-uniform sensor quality. These failures highlight the need for predictable latency bounds, cross-platform calibration protocols, and safety-aware trust architectures.

4.6. Cross-Industry Comparison

A comparative assessment across healthcare, finance, manufacturing, smart cities, and autonomous systems reveals that platform convergence follows recurring principles—functional complementarity, data interlocking, and embedded processes—yet manifests very different requirements and constraints in each domain. These variations highlight why sector-specific designs continue to dominate and why generalized convergence models remain limited.

4.6.1. Privacy and Data Governance

Healthcare and finance impose the strictest privacy and compliance requirements (HIPAA, GDPR, AML/KYC), demanding strong data provenance, access control, and explainability. Manufacturing and autonomous systems operate with lower privacy sensitivity but higher operational security, while smart cities face public acceptability challenges, requiring transparent governance and consent mechanisms.

4.6.2. Real-Time Performance and Latency

Autonomous systems and smart city traffic control require sub-second responsiveness, making heavy blockchain consensus or cloud-only processing infeasible. Manufacturing demands deterministic latency for cyber–physical coordination. Healthcare exhibits mixed latency needs—real-time monitoring versus batch analytics—while finance must ensure millisecond-scale performance for trading and fraud detection.

4.6.3. Trust Mechanisms and Risk Profiles

Financial and healthcare systems prioritize verifiable data provenance and auditable decision trails. Manufacturing and smart cities rely more on operational reliability and infrastructure-level trust. Autonomous systems face the highest systemic risk, as misaligned AI–IoT–edge coordination can result in physical harm. These differences shape how AI and blockchain are combined—or avoided—in each sector.

4.6.4. System Coupling and Interoperability

Manufacturing and smart cities involve tightly coupled cyber–physical infrastructures that amplify instability when components fail. Healthcare and finance operate through loosely coupled but highly regulated data platforms. Autonomous systems exhibit both tight control loops and distributed coordination, making them sensitive to unpredictable edge behavior.

4.6.5. Design Implications

This comparison shows that convergence architectures cannot be uniformly applied; instead, they require sector-specific adaptations in identity management, data standards, latency budgeting, governance, and trust modeling. Understanding these cross-industry differences is essential for guiding future research on unified architectures, semantic interoperability, and adaptive orchestration mechanisms capable of managing uncertainty and heterogeneity across domains.

5. Technical Enablers of Platform Convergence

The convergence of platform technologies is made possible by several core technical enablers that provide intelligence, connectivity, trust, and interoperability across systems. These enablers not only empower collaborative innovation but also address latency, security, and scalability challenges inherent in large-scale distributed ecosystems. Technical enablers are the foundational technologies that facilitate seamless integration, communication, and intelligent operations across convergent platforms. They enable functional complementarity, data interlocking, and process embedding across AI, IoT, blockchain, cloud-edge architectures, and communication infrastructures, producing emergent system properties beyond the mere stacking of technologies.
These enablers range from AI and machine learning, which provide predictive and adaptive capabilities, to IoT and edge-cloud integration, which ensure real-time sensing and distributed processing. Emerging communication infrastructures such as 5G/6G, blockchain for trust and transparency, and immersive technologies like digital twins and XR interfaces further enhance platform convergence by enabling high-performance, interactive, and secure ecosystems [55]. Importantly, the combination of these enablers generates synergistic effects—for instance, AI-driven edge analytics with blockchain-based trust mechanisms can simultaneously optimize decision-making, reduce latency, and enhance security, producing a systemic effect greater than the sum of individual technologies. Understanding these enablers, their interdependencies, and emergent behaviors is critical for designing effective and future-proof convergent platforms.
The technical enablers reviewed illustrate a diverse ecosystem of tools that collectively drive platform convergence. AI and ML support intelligent decision-making, while IoT and edge-cloud architectures provide low-latency processing and scalability. Blockchain ensures trust and transparency, and communication infrastructures like 5G/6G provide the necessary connectivity backbone [56]. Immersive technologies and digital twins offer predictive insights and simulation capabilities. Despite these advantages, challenges such as interoperability, security, computational cost, and standardization gaps persist, highlighting the need for ongoing research and cross-domain collaboration to realize fully integrated platform ecosystems. Table 2 summarizes the key enablers, their roles, advantages, and associated challenges, also illustrating how their interactions produce new systemic capabilities rather than just additive benefits. Table 2 synthesizes widely established concepts in the platform-convergence literature, presenting general technological enablers rather than findings derived from specific individual studies.

6. Architectural Frameworks and Interoperability Models

Architectural frameworks define how multiple platform technologies are structured, orchestrated, and integrated, providing a blueprint for achieving interoperability and cross-platform collaboration. Reference architectures, semantic ontologies, microservices, and hybrid cloud-edge designs provide modular, flexible, and scalable approaches to platform construction. By standardizing interfaces and protocols, these frameworks reduce complexity, promote reuse, and enable cross-domain applicability, thereby fostering more robust and sustainable platform ecosystems. Table 3 highlights the key frameworks, their roles, benefits, and technical challenges. Table 3 synthesizes widely recognized architectural and interoperability concepts that recur across the platform-convergence literature. The frameworks listed represent established design patterns rather than claims based on specific individual studies.

7. Emerging Trends, Research Gaps, Future Directions, and Conclusions

The landscape of converging platform technologies is evolving rapidly, driven by advances in AI, IoT, edge–cloud computing, blockchain, and next-generation communication networks. Emerging trends point toward the integration of quantum computing for high-performance analytics, digital twins and extended reality for immersive simulation and real-time monitoring, and green computing strategies that prioritize energy-efficient and sustainable operations. Ethical, regulatory, and governance considerations are becoming equally critical, especially in sensitive sectors such as healthcare, finance, and smart infrastructure. The accelerated pace of development highlights the need for interdisciplinary collaboration across academia, industry, and policy sectors to ensure safe, responsible, and scalable adoption.
While these innovations are transforming the design, architecture, and operation of convergent platforms, they also expose unresolved gaps and practical challenges. Trends such as quantum acceleration, XR-based interfaces, and sustainable computing redefine technical possibilities but reveal the absence of mature frameworks for system-wide integration. Likewise, cross-domain data exchange and interoperability remain limited due to fragmented standards, inconsistent ontologies, and domain-specific constraints. Identifying and addressing these gaps is essential to guide future research and ensure that platform-level innovations translate into transparent, reliable, and socially responsible systems. Table 4 summarizes major trends, potential impacts, and corresponding opportunities for future investigation. Table 4 synthesizes broadly recognized emerging trends and forward-looking themes discussed across the platform-convergence literature. The elements listed reflect widely acknowledged directions in the field rather than claims tied to specific individual studies.

7.1. Technological Collaboration Mechanisms

As platform technologies converge, collaboration mechanisms play a central role in enabling coordinated, adaptive, and scalable system behavior. Three classes of mechanisms are increasingly prominent. First, functional complementarity integrates technologies with distinct capabilities—such as AI-driven perception with blockchain-based verification—to achieve outcomes unattainable by individual components. Second, process embedding aligns sensing, computing, and decision-making workflows across IoT, edge, and cloud layers, enabling real-time responsiveness and context-aware optimization. Third, data interlocking creates shared, interoperable data ecosystems where semantic alignment, multi-modal fusion, and cross-platform mediation support complex analytics and collective intelligence. Together, these mechanisms form the structural basis for coherent multi-technology ecosystems, supporting interoperability, robustness, and emergent system-wide behavior.
Despite advances in blockchain, federated learning, and decentralized identity systems, current trust mechanisms face several limitations. Blockchain introduces latency and computational overhead that conflict with real-time AI and IoT requirements. Federated learning reduces data exposure but remains vulnerable to poisoning, gradient leakage, and inconsistent client participation. Moreover, decentralized identifiers and verifiable credentials lack cross-domain standardization, limiting their applicability in heterogeneous environments. These limitations reveal the need for hybrid trust models that combine cryptographic assurance, behavioral analytics, and governance-layer verification to maintain reliability across dynamic, multi-stakeholder ecosystems.

7.2. Identified Research Gaps

Despite significant progress, several gaps persist across converging platform technologies. First, full cross-domain interoperability is hindered by the lack of unified reference architectures, standardized data models, and domain-agnostic ontologies. Second, ethical governance mechanisms for integrated AI–IoT–cloud ecosystems remain fragmented, limiting transparency and accountability. Third, sustainability considerations—particularly long-term resource lifecycle assessment and carbon-aware orchestration—are insufficiently embedded in current platform designs. Lastly, interdisciplinary collaboration frameworks remain underdeveloped, constraining the translation of technological advancements into policy and real-world impact.

7.3. Future Research Directions

Future research should combine architectural, ethical, and ecosystem-level perspectives to enable scalable and trustworthy convergent platforms. Key directions include:
  • Developing unified reference architectures, standardized ontologies, and interoperability protocols for seamless cross-platform integration.
  • Embedding emerging technologies such as quantum computing, digital twins, and extended reality within secure, resource-aware platform frameworks.
  • Advancing privacy-preserving AI, decentralized trust mechanisms, and adaptive edge–cloud orchestration for resilience and transparency.
  • Strengthening governance and regulatory frameworks to ensure accountable, equitable, and responsible system behavior.
  • Establishing interdisciplinary collaboration models bridging industry, academia, and government to accelerate adoption and societal impact.

7.4. Conclusions

Converging platform technologies promise transformative impacts across healthcare, finance, manufacturing, transportation, smart cities, and autonomous systems. This review synthesizes core technological enablers, architectural paradigms, and emerging innovations while identifying opportunities and remaining challenges. Achieving truly intelligent, interoperable, and sustainable platforms will require not only technological advances but also robust governance mechanisms, unified standards, and coordinated cross-sector collaboration.
Ultimately, the future of convergent platforms will be defined by their ability to integrate diverse technologies into cohesive ecosystems that are adaptive, explainable, energy-aware, and resilient to systemic uncertainty. By addressing current limitations and fostering interdisciplinary innovation, next-generation platforms can evolve into scalable, trustworthy infrastructures that support societal well-being, economic growth, and sustainable technological progress.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.; methodology, A.M.; validation, M.A.; formal analysis, M.A.; resources, M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, F.M.; writing—review and editing, A.M.; supervision, F.M. The authors declare that Generative AI was utilized only for grammar checking and proofreading. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Therefore, data sharing is not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AIArtificial Intelligence
APIsApplication Programming Interfaces
ARAugmented Reality
CPSCyber-Physical System
DeFiDecentralized Finance
DPDifferential Privacy
IIoTIndustrial Internet of Things
LiDARLight Detection and Ranging
MLMachine Learning
MRMixed Reality
OTAOver-The-Air
PQCPost-Quantum Cryptography
QoSQuality of Service
SDKSoftware Development Kit
V2XVehicle-to-Everything
VRVirtual Reality
XRExtended Reality

References

  1. Haque, E.U.; Abbasi, W.; Almogren, A.; Choi, J.; Altameem, A.; Rehman, A.U.; Hamam, H. Performance enhancement in blockchain based IoT data sharing using lightweight consensus algorithm. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 26561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Saeed, S.; Jhanjhi, N.Z.; Khan, M.A.; Yadav, D.K. Digital transformation and cybersecurity challenges. Front. Comput. Sci. 2025, 7, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Majeed, A.; Hwang, S.O. A Data-Centric AI Paradigm for Socio-Industrial and Global Challenges. Electronics 2024, 13, 2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Majeed, A.; Hwang, S.O. Towards unlocking the hidden potentials of the data-centric AI paradigm in the modern era. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2024, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Imtiaz, H.H.; Khan, W.U.; Bashir, A.K.; Obayya, M.; Negm, N.; Yahya, A.E.; Dutta, A.K. Digital Twin Enabled 6G MEC Networks: Computational Energy Efficiency for Consumer IIoT in Industry 5.0. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2025, 71, 7874–7881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, D.; Woo, H.; Lee, Y. Addressing bias and fairness using fair federated learning: A synthetic review. Electronics 2024, 13, 4664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Majeed, A.; Patni, S.; Hwang, S.O. A Comprehensive Analysis of Privacy-Preserving Solutions Developed for IoT-Based Systems and Applications. Electronics 2025, 14, 2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Park, S.; Bae, S.; Lee, J.; Sung, Y. Real-Time Dynamic Pricing for Edge Computing Services: A Market Perspective. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 134754–134769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, J.; Solat, F.; Kim, T.Y.; Poor, H.V. Federated learning-empowered mobile network management for 5G and beyond networks: From access to core. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2024, 26, 2176–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rehman, Z.; Tariq, N.; Moqurrab, S.A.; Yoo, J.; Srivastava, G. Machine learning and internet of things applications in enterprise architectures: Solutions, challenges, and open issues. Expert Syst. 2024, 41, e13467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mehmood, F.; Mumtaz, N.; Mehmood, A. Next-Generation Tools for Patient Care and Rehabilitation: A Review of Modern Innovations. Actuators 2025, 14, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mehmood, F.; Mehmood, A.; Whangbo, T.K. Alzheimer’s Disease Detection in Various Brain Anatomies Based on Optimized Vision Transformer. Mathematics 2025, 13, 1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mehmood, F.; Mehmood, A. Recent Advancements in Millimeter-Wave Antennas and Arrays: From Compact Wearable Designs to Beam-Steering Technologies. Electronics 2025, 14, 2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Khan, F. Emerging trends and challenges of IoT in smart healthcare systems, smart cities and education. Sensors 2024, 24, 5735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mehmood, F.; Rehman, S.U.; Choi, A. Vision-AQ: Explainable Multi-Modal Deep Learning for Air Pollution Classification in Smart Cities. Mathematics 2025, 13, 3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nwachukwu, C.; Durodola-Tunde, K.; Akwiwu-Uzoma, C. AI-driven anomaly detection in cloud computing environments. Int. J. Sci. Res. Arch. 2024, 13, 692–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Du, W.; Li, M.; Wu, L.; Han, Y.; Zhou, T.; Yang, X. A efficient and robust privacy-preserving framework for cross-device federated learning. Complex Intell. Syst. 2023, 9, 4923–4937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ahmed, W.A.; MacCarthy, B.L. Blockchain-enabled supply chain traceability—How wide? How deep? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2023, 263, 108963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chinta, S. Edge AI for real-time decision making in IoT networks. Int. J. Innov. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 2024, 12, 11293–11309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wijethilaka, S.; Liyanage, M. Survey on network slicing for Internet of Things realization in 5G networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2021, 23, 957–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhong, D.; Xia, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Duan, J. Overview of predictive maintenance based on digital twin technology. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dib, O.; Rababah, B. Decentralized identity systems: Architecture, challenges, solutions and future directions. Ann. Emerg. Technol. Comput. (AETiC) 2020, 4, 19–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chaturvedi, K.; Kolbe, T.H. Towards establishing cross-platform interoperability for sensors in smart cities. Sensors 2019, 19, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abbas, S.R.; Abbas, Z.; Zahir, A.; Lee, S.W. Federated learning in smart healthcare: A comprehensive review on privacy, security, and predictive analytics with IoT integration. Healthcare 2024, 12, 2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Blanco-Justicia, A.; Sánchez, D.; Domingo-Ferrer, J.; Muralidhar, K. A critical review on the use (and misuse) of differential privacy in machine learning. ACM Comput. Surv. 2022, 55, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, L.; Han, M. EcoIntegrity: AI-Augmented Blockchain Framework for Carbon Footprint Tracking and Incentives in IoT. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Grid Inspired Future Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA, 23–24 March 2024; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 159–181. [Google Scholar]
  27. Shalavi, N.; Perin, G.; Zanella, A.; Rossi, M. Energy efficient deployment and orchestration of computing resources at the network edge: A survey on algorithms, trends and open challenges. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2209.14141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, O.T. End-to-end adaptive QoS provisioning over GPRS wireless mobile network. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2003, 8, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Goumopoulos, C. Smart city middleware: A survey and a conceptual framework. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 4015–4047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kovacevic, A.; Gligoric, N. Enhancing security of automotive ota firmware updates via decentralized identifiers and distributed ledger technology. Electronics 2024, 13, 4640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ota, J. Multi-agent robot systems as distributed autonomous systems. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2006, 20, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Teclaw, W.; O’Donnel, J.; Kukkonen, V.; Pauwels, P.; Labonnote, N.; Hjelseth, E. Federating cross-domain BIM-based knowledge graph. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2024, 62, 102770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Irshad, A. Latency Optimization in Edge vs. Cloud Computing: A Comparative Study for Real-Time Applications. Int. J. Bus. Comput. Sci. 2024, 1, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
  34. Putra, G.D.; Dedeoglu, V.; Kanhere, S.S.; Jurdak, R. Trust management in decentralized iot access control system. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC), Toronto, ON, Canada, 2–6 May 2020; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  35. Abdellatif, A.A.; Abo-Eleneen, A.; Mohamed, A.; Erbad, A.; Navkar, N.V.; Guizani, M. Intelligent-slicing: An AI-assisted network slicing framework for 5G-and-beyond networks. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 2023, 20, 1024–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, S.U.; Zhu, L.; Jeffery, R. Data governance for platform ecosystems: Critical factors and the state of practice. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1705.03509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Alatise, M.B.; Hancke, G.P. A review on challenges of autonomous mobile robot and sensor fusion methods. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 39830–39846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Arnold, O.; Golchert, S.; Rennert, M.; Jantke, K.P. Interactive collaborative learning with explainable artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, Vienna, Austria, 27–30 September 2022; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 13–24. [Google Scholar]
  39. Haque, E.U.; Shah, A.; Iqbal, J.; Ullah, S.S.; Alroobaea, R.; Hussain, S. A scalable blockchain based framework for efficient IoT data management using lightweight consensus. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 7841. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, C.; Wang, G.; Wang, S.; Zhan, D.; Yin, M. Cross-domain network attack detection enabled by heterogeneous transfer learning. Comput. Netw. 2023, 227, 109692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lu, Z.; Pan, H.; Dai, Y.; Si, X.; Zhang, Y. Federated learning with non-iid data: A survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 19188–19209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Clark, A.; Zonouz, S. Cyber-physical resilience: Definition and assessment metric. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2017, 10, 1671–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. De Mello, B.H.; Rigo, S.J.; Da Costa, C.A.; da Rosa Righi, R.; Donida, B.; Bez, M.R.; Schunke, L.C. Semantic interoperability in health records standards: A systematic literature review. Health Technol. 2022, 12, 255–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jin, H.; Zhang, P.; Dong, H.; Zhu, Y.; Bouguettaya, A. Privacy-aware forecasting of quality of service in mobile edge computing. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2021, 16, 478–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wu, F.; Zhou, B.; Song, J.; Xie, L. Quantum-resistant blockchain and performance analysis. J. Supercomput. 2025, 81, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Akhtar, E.D.S.; Khan, I.; Jumani, A.; Talpur, M.R.H.; Iqbal, A.; Rafique, A.A. Advancing Multi-Modal Machine Learning in Smart Environments: Integrating Visual, Auditory, and Sensorial Data for Context-Aware Human–AI Interaction. Annu. Methodol. Arch. Res. Rev. 2025, 3, 26–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rallis, K.; Liliopoulos, I.; Varsamis, G.D.; Tsipas, E.; Karafyllidis, I.G.; Sirakoulis, G.C.; Dimitrakis, P. Interfacing Quantum Computing Systems with High-Performance Computing Systems: An Overview. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2509.06205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Alshudukhi, K.S.; Khemakhem, M.A.; Eassa, F.E.; Jambi, K.M. An interoperable blockchain security frameworks based on microservices and smart contract in IoT environment. Electronics 2023, 12, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Guo, L.; He, Y.; Wan, C.; Li, Y.; Luo, L. From cloud manufacturing to cloud–edge collaborative manufacturing. Robot.-Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2024, 90, 102790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, H.; Zhang, W.; Xu, Y.; He, D.; Li, H. Broadcasting and 6G converged network architecture. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 2024, 70, 971–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mavrogiorgou, A.; Kiourtis, A.; Perakis, K.; Pitsios, S.; Kyriazis, D. IoT in healthcare: Achieving interoperability of high-quality data acquired by IoT medical devices. Sensors 2019, 19, 1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mehmood, A.; Muhammad, A.; Mehmood, F.; Song, W.C. Enhancing vehicle location prediction accuracy with road-aware rectification for multi-access edge computing applications. Mathematics 2024, 12, 3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Arif, M.; Kim, W.; Mehmood, A. Performance of UAV-assisted C-V2X communications with 3D antenna beam-width fluctuations. Comput. Commun. 2025, 242, 108267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ullah, I.; Arishi, A.; Singh, S.K.; Alharbi, F.; Ibrahim, A.H.; Islam, M.; Daradkeh, Y.I.; Choi, C. Autonomous network management for 6G communication: A comprehensive survey. Digit. Commun. Netw. 2025; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Anwar, M.S.; Alhalabi, W.; Choi, A.; Ullah, I.; Alhudali, A. Internet of metaverse things (IoMT): Applications, technology challenges and security consideration. In Future Communication Systems Using Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things and Data Science; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024; pp. 133–158. [Google Scholar]
  56. Jeong, J.; Lee, J. A Federated Reinforcement Learning Framework via a Committee Mechanism for Resource Management in 5G Networks. Sensors 2024, 24, 7031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Organization of the review paper.
Figure 1. Organization of the review paper.
Electronics 14 04787 g001
Table 2. Technical Enablers of Platform Convergence.
Table 2. Technical Enablers of Platform Convergence.
Technical EnablersDescription/RoleKey AdvantagesChallenges/Considerations
AI and Machine Learning IntegrationEnables predictive analytics, adaptive decision-making, autonomous operations, and automation across converged platforms.Improved intelligence, anomaly detection, optimized workflows, enhanced personalization.Data quality and labeling, interpretability, model bias, computational cost, integration with legacy systems.
IoT and Edge–Cloud SynergyProvides real-time sensing, communication, and distributed processing across devices, edge nodes, and cloud infrastructure.Low-latency responses, distributed analytics, scalable monitoring, energy efficiency.Heterogeneous device integration, network congestion, latency management, security and privacy challenges.
Blockchain and Distributed Ledger TechnologiesEnsures trust, transparency, and secure data sharing across decentralized platforms.Decentralized trust, tamper-proof transactions, smart contracts, auditability.Scalability, latency, energy consumption, interoperability, key and identity management.
5G/6G Communication InfrastructureSupports high-throughput, low-latency, massive device connectivity, and network slicing for converged platforms.Ultra-reliable connectivity, low-latency applications, enhanced QoS, support for autonomous systems.Deployment cost, interoperability, standardization gaps, spectrum allocation, infrastructure complexity.
Cybersecurity and Trust Management FrameworksProtects systems against attacks and ensures secure, reliable interactions across nodes and platforms.Data integrity, user privacy, resilience to threats, continuous monitoring.Dynamic threat landscape, system complexity, policy enforcement, compliance with regulations.
Middleware and API StandardizationProvides integration layers, standardized communication protocols, and modular interfaces for seamless platform interoperability.Interoperability, modularity, flexible integration, faster deployment.Lack of universal standards, maintenance overhead, versioning conflicts, vendor lock-in.
Digital Twin and Simulation PlatformsEnable virtual replicas of physical systems to optimize operations and predict failures.Predictive maintenance, enhanced decision-making, scenario analysis.Data fidelity, model accuracy, computational requirements, synchronization with real systems.
Extended Reality (AR/VR/MR) InterfacesProvides immersive visualization and interaction across converged platforms.Training, simulation, human-in-the-loop decision-making, intuitive monitoring.High computational cost, content creation complexity, latency issues, device heterogeneity.
Table 3. Architectural Frameworks and Interoperability Models.
Table 3. Architectural Frameworks and Interoperability Models.
FrameworksDescription/RoleKey AdvantagesChallenges/Considerations
Reference ArchitecturesProvide standardized blueprints for integrating multiple converging platforms across domains.Consistency, repeatability, faster deployment, easier collaboration across stakeholders.Domain-specific adaptation, evolving standards, balancing flexibility with rigidity.
Data Interchange Standards and Semantic OntologiesEnable uniform data representation and semantic understanding across heterogeneous systems.Interoperability, enhanced analytics, reduced miscommunication, reusable data models.Maintenance of ontologies, alignment across platforms, handling semantic conflicts.
Cross-Platform Integration Layers (APIs, SDKs, Middleware)Serve as interface layers for seamless communication between diverse platforms and modules.Modularity, flexibility, rapid integration, reduced development complexity.Versioning conflicts, dependency management, security vulnerabilities, documentation overhead.
Microservices and Containerized ArchitecturesDecompose platform functionalities into modular services for flexibility and scalability.Scalability, independent deployment, easier updates, resource efficiency.Orchestration complexity, network overhead, monitoring and debugging challenges.
Event-Driven and Message-Oriented MiddlewareProvides asynchronous communication and event propagation across platform modules.Loose coupling, responsiveness, scalable workflows, real-time event handling.Message loss, ordering issues, monitoring, and debugging complexity.
Case Studies: End-to-End Convergent EcosystemsShowcase practical implementations across multiple domains, highlighting success and limitations.Demonstrates real-world feasibility, lessons learned, validation of design choices.Generalization to other domains, resource constraints, cost and complexity of deployment.
Hybrid Cloud–Edge ArchitecturesCombine cloud computing with edge nodes to balance performance, cost, and latency.Optimized computation, low-latency response, enhanced reliability, adaptive resource allocation.Complexity of orchestration, security across heterogeneous nodes, network management.
Table 4. Emerging Trends, Impacts, and Future Research Opportunities in Platform Convergence.
Table 4. Emerging Trends, Impacts, and Future Research Opportunities in Platform Convergence.
TrendDescription/RolePotential ImpactResearch Opportunities/Challenges
Quantum ComputingQuantum acceleration for complex computational tasks.High-performance analytics, large-scale optimization.Hybrid quantum–classical models, co-design, fault tolerance.
Digital Twins and Extended RealityVirtual replicas and immersive interfaces.Enhanced monitoring, simulation, predictive maintenance.Data fidelity, synchronization, scalability, model standards.
Sustainable and Green ComputingEnergy-efficient architectures for distributed platforms.Reduced environmental impact, higher efficiency.Renewable-powered systems, carbon-aware orchestration.
Ethics, Governance, and RegulationFrameworks for transparency and accountability.Trustworthy intelligent systems and wider societal acceptance.Global standards, ethical AI deployment, real-time compliance.
Interdisciplinary CollaborationMulti-stakeholder coordination across domains.Accelerated innovation, unified standards, harmonized deployment.Shared data platforms, governance models, interoperability protocols.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mehmood, A.; Arif, M.; Mehmood, F. Towards a Unified Digital Ecosystem: The Role of Platform Technology Convergence. Electronics 2025, 14, 4787. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14244787

AMA Style

Mehmood A, Arif M, Mehmood F. Towards a Unified Digital Ecosystem: The Role of Platform Technology Convergence. Electronics. 2025; 14(24):4787. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14244787

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mehmood, Asif, Mohammad Arif, and Faisal Mehmood. 2025. "Towards a Unified Digital Ecosystem: The Role of Platform Technology Convergence" Electronics 14, no. 24: 4787. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14244787

APA Style

Mehmood, A., Arif, M., & Mehmood, F. (2025). Towards a Unified Digital Ecosystem: The Role of Platform Technology Convergence. Electronics, 14(24), 4787. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14244787

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop