Exploring the In Vitro Antioxidant, Anti-Aging, and Cytotoxic Properties of Kaempferia galanga Linn. Rhizome Extracts for Cosmeceutical Formulations

: Kaempferia galanga Linn. (KG), a member of the family Zingiberaceae, is native to India, and commonly found in China, Indonesia, and Thailand. It has been used as a food condiment, folk medicine, and to relieve skin diseases due to its biological activities. However, its anti-aging effect has not yet been investigated. In this study, the rhizome of Kaempferia galanga Linn was extracted with solvents of different polarities (deionized water, absolute ethanol, ethyl acetate, and hexane). Phytochemical screening assay, total flavonoid and total phenolic contents, antioxidant activity (DPPH • , FRAP, ABTS + • assay), anti-aging activity (anti-collagenase, anti-elastase), and cell cytotoxicity on human dermal fibroblasts were investigated. The outcomes revealed that the extraction in highly polar solvents resulted in a high extract yield. Flavonoids, phenolic, and terpenoid compounds were detected in KG extracts using all extraction solvents. However, deionized water as a solvent exhibited the lowest level of flavonoids and phenolics, as compared to the other solvents. The highest total flavonoid and phenolic contents were achieved through extraction with absolute ethanol and ethyl acetate, respectively. Interestingly, the extract obtained with absolute ethanol exhibited the most potent antioxidant activities (the IC 50 value of DPPH • was 0.612 mg/mL, the FRAP value was 62.79 mmol of Fe 2+ /g of extract, and TEAC value was 9.21 mg TE/g of extract in ABTS + • assay) and anti-aging properties (the percentages of collagenase inhibitory and elastase were 71.83%, and 66.35%, respectively). Regarding cell cytotoxicity, both KG extracts obtained with deionized water and absolute ethanol showed lower toxicity on human dermal fibroblasts compared to those obtained with ethyl acetate and hexane. Ethanol-based KG extract demonstrated a good antioxidant, anti-aging capacity and is considered safe for cosmeceutical products focused on anti-aging applications.


Kaempferia galanga Linn. Preparation and Extraction
The rhizome of Kaempferia galanga Linn.(KG) was collected from the north of Thailand and extracted using the maceration method with different solvents (deionized water, absolute ethanol, ethyl acetate, and hexane).The fresh rhizomes of KG were cut into small pieces, washed with clean water, and then dried in a hot-air oven at 50 • C for 3 days.Subsequently, the dried plant material was finely powdered using a hammer mill (Figure 1).Briefly, 100 g of the KG powder was mixed with each solvent (400 mL) and left at room temperature for 48 h in the dark.Afterward, each solvent extract was filtrated using vacuum filtration with Whatman ™ (Maidstone, UK) filter paper No.1.The organic solvent was then removed via a rotary evaporator at 50 • C to obtain crude extracts.The aqueous extract underwent dehydration through lyophilization.Crude extracts were stored at −20 • C for further experiments.The percentage of extraction yield (%) was determined using the following equation: Extraction yield (%) = (Weight of crude extract/Weight of powdered sample) × 100 (1)

Kaempferia galanga Linn. Preparation and Extraction
The rhizome of Kaempferia galanga Linn.(KG) was collected from the north of Thailand and extracted using the maceration method with different solvents (deionized water, absolute ethanol, ethyl acetate, and hexane).The fresh rhizomes of KG were cut into small pieces, washed with clean water, and then dried in a hot-air oven at 50 °C for 3 days.Subsequently, the dried plant material was finely powdered using a hammer mill (Figure 1).Briefly, 100 g of the KG powder was mixed with each solvent (400 mL) and left at room temperature for 48 h in the dark.Afterward, each solvent extract was filtrated using vacuum filtration with Whatman ™ filter paper No.1.The organic solvent was then removed via a rotary evaporator at 50 °C to obtain crude extracts.The aqueous extract underwent dehydration through lyophilization.Crude extracts were stored at −20 °C for further experiments.The percentage of extraction yield (%) was determined using the following equation: Extraction yield (%) = (Weight of crude extract/Weight of powdered sample) × 100 (1)

Preliminary Phytochemical Screening of Kaempferia galanga Linn. Extracts
For preliminary screening of the phytochemical compounds (flavonoids, phenolics, and terpenoids), a small portion of the crude extract obtained from each solvent is subjected to phytochemical tests according to the methods reported by Abioye [12] and Harbourne [13] with some modifications.Color formation changes in the phytochemical tests serve as indicators of the presence of the targeted compounds.

Determination of Flavonoid Compounds
Flavonoids are a class of plant secondary metabolites known for their antioxidant properties and various health benefits.Flavonoid compounds were determined using Shinoda's test.Briefly, 0.2 mg of each crude extract was dissolved in 1 mL of absolute ethanol, and a few fragments of magnesium metal were added.Subsequently, 3 drops of concentrated hydrochloric acid were added to the test solution.The development of orange, red, or magenta coloration indicated the presence of flavonoids (flavone and flavonols).

Determination of Phenolic Compounds
Phenolic compounds are another class of phytochemicals known for their antioxidant properties.The presence of phenolics was determined using ferric chloride (FeCl3) reagent.Briefly, 0.2 mg of each crude extract was dissolved in absolute ethanol 2 mL, and a few drops of 10% w/v ferric chloride solution were added.The formation of violet or deep purple or blue or dark green coloration indicated the presence of phenolics.

Preliminary Phytochemical Screening of Kaempferia galanga Linn. Extracts
For preliminary screening of the phytochemical compounds (flavonoids, phenolics, and terpenoids), a small portion of the crude extract obtained from each solvent is subjected to phytochemical tests according to the methods reported by Abioye [12] and Harbourne [13] with some modifications.Color formation changes in the phytochemical tests serve as indicators of the presence of the targeted compounds.

Determination of Flavonoid Compounds
Flavonoids are a class of plant secondary metabolites known for their antioxidant properties and various health benefits.Flavonoid compounds were determined using Shinoda's test.Briefly, 0.2 mg of each crude extract was dissolved in 1 mL of absolute ethanol, and a few fragments of magnesium metal were added.Subsequently, 3 drops of concentrated hydrochloric acid were added to the test solution.The development of orange, red, or magenta coloration indicated the presence of flavonoids (flavone and flavonols).

Determination of Phenolic Compounds
Phenolic compounds are another class of phytochemicals known for their antioxidant properties.The presence of phenolics was determined using ferric chloride (FeCl 3 ) reagent.Briefly, 0.2 mg of each crude extract was dissolved in absolute ethanol 2 mL, and a few drops of 10% w/v ferric chloride solution were added.The formation of violet or deep purple or blue or dark green coloration indicated the presence of phenolics.

Determination of Terpenoid Compounds
The presence of terpenoid compounds was determined by Salkowski's Test.Briefly, 0.2 mg of each crude extract was dissolved in absolute ethanol (2 mL) and mixed with chloroform (2 mL), followed by slowly adding a few drops of concentrated sulfuric acid to form a layer.The presence of a dish-brown color in the middle layer was indicative of a steroidal ring.The formation of reddish brown indicated the presence of terpenoids.

Determination of Total Phenolic Contents
Total phenolic contents of all KG extracts were determined using a Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method with some modification [14].The 20 µL of each crude extract solution dissolved in ethanol (1 mg/mL) was mixed with 100 µL of Folin-Ciocalteu's phenol reagent (10% v/v) in a 96-well microplate.After incubation for 5 min, 20% sodium carbonate solution (80 µL) was added in the well and the reaction mixtures were incubated in the dark for another 30 min at room temperature.The absorbance of the solution was measured at 760 nm using a microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA).Gallic acid solution at different final concentrations (2-30 µg/mL) was used as a calibration standard (Supplemental Table S1 and Figure S1).The total phenolic content is expressed in terms of milligrams of gallic acid equivalent per gram of the dried crude extracts (mg of GAE/g of dried crude extract).

Determination of Total Flavonoid Contents
Total flavonoid contents of all KG extracts were determined using an aluminum chloride complexation colorimetric method with some modification [14].A total of 50 µL of each crude extract dissolved in ethanol (1 mg/mL) was mixed with 30 µL of 5% sodium nitrite solution in a 96-well microplate.After incubating for 5 min, 10% aluminum chloride solution (30 µL) was added to the well, and the reaction mixtures were incubated in the dark for 6 min at room temperature.Then, 90 µL of sodium hydroxide (1 M) was added to the mixtures and incubated for 15 min at room temperature.The absorbance of the solution was measured at 510 nm using a microplate reader (BioTek Instruments).The amount of total flavonoid content in the samples was quantified from the calibration curve of quercetin solution with different final concentrations (0.75-12.5 µg/mL) (Supplemental Table S2 and Figure S2) and expressed in terms of milligrams of catechin equivalent per gram of the dried crude extracts (mg of QE/g of dried crude extract).

Antioxidant Activities of Kaempferia galanga Linn. Extracts
The in vitro antioxidant activities of four KG extracts (deionized water, absolute ethanol, ethyl acetate, and hexane) were investigated based on DPPH • radical scavenging activity, ABTS +• radical scavenging activity, and ferric reducing antioxidant power, which are the most commonly used methods to determine antioxidant activities of natural products even when present in complex biological mixtures.

DPPH • Radical Scavenging Activity
The DPPH • radical scavenging was developed many years ago and adopted as the standard method to determine antioxidant activity.This assay is based on the transfer of both a hydrogen atom and an electron and the spectrophotometric measurements of the capacity of antioxidants to scavenge DPPH • radicals.The free radical scavenging abilities of all KG extracts were determined using the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH • ) method with some modification [15].Each KG extract solution (70 µL) at various concentrations (final concentration 0.5-5 mg/mL) (Supplemental Table S3) was mixed with 70 µL of DPPH • solution (0.2 mM ethanolic DPPH • solution).The mixture was incubated for 20 min in the dark at room temperature.The absorbance was determined at 517 nm after incubation using a microplate reader.Trolox was used as the positive control (Supplemental Table S3).All measurements were performed in triplicate.The percentage of inhibition of free radical scavenging ability was calculated by the following equation: where Ab is the absorbance of the blank solution and As is the absorbance of the sample solution.The antioxidant activities of all extracts were finally expressed as IC 50 value, defined as the concentration (mg/mL) of the extract showing 50% inhibition.

ABTS +• Radical Scavenging Activity
The ABTS +• radical scavenging is a spectrophotometric technique based on quenching the stability of a colored radical.The antioxidant capacity of the KG extracts was measured using the ABTS +• (2,2 ′ -azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt free radical assay with some modification [15].The ABTS +• solution (7 mM) was prepared by dissolving it in deionized water prior to mixing with 140 mM potassium persulphate (ratio 1:1).The mixture was light-protected and incubated at room temperature for 16 h to allow ABTS +• free radicals to be generated.Afterward, it was diluted with distilled water (1:49 v/v) to achieve the optimized absorbance (0.80 ± 0.20) at 734 nm.
Each KG extract solution (70 µL) at a final concentration of 1 mg/mL was mixed with 140 µL of ABTS +• solution.The mixture was incubated for 6 min in the dark at room temperature.The absorbance was determined at 734 nm after incubation using a microplate reader.The results of the ABTS •+ radical assays are presented as Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) using Trolox (final concentration 0.195-12.5 µg/mL) as the reference standard (Supplemental Table S4 and Figure S3) and expressed in terms of milligrams of Trolox equivalent per gram of the dried crude extracts (mg of TE/g of dried crude extract).All measurements were performed in triplicate.

Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)
The FRAP test is simple, fast, cost-effective, and does not require specialized equipment.The total reducing power of all KG extracts were measured using a ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay, which measures the total capacity of the sample to reduce Fe 3+ into Fe 2+ with some modification [16].Briefly, aliquots of 70 µL from each KG extract solution (final concentration 0.5 mg/mL) were mixed with 140 µL of FRAP reagent (300 mM acetate buffer pH 3.6: 10 mM TPTZ solution in 40 mM HCl: 20 mM FeCl 3 solution in a ratio of 10:1:1).The absorbance at 593 nm of the mixture solutions was measured after 30-min incubation in the dark at room temperature using a microtiter plate reader.Ferrous sulfate solution (FeSO 4 ) at various concentrations (final concentration 0.008-0.125mM) served as a calibration standard (Supplemental Table S5 and Figure S4) and Trolox was used as a positive control.The results were expressed as the ferric reducing antioxidant power equivalent concentration (FRAP value).This index is defined as the concentration of the extract having a ferric reducing ability equivalent to that of 1 mM FeSO 4 .All measurements were conducted in triplicate.

Anti-Aging Activities
Anti-aging activities were investigated by measuring collagenase and elastase inhibitory activities based on spectrophotometric methods.

Collagenase Inhibitory Activity
The collagenase inhibitory activity of KG extracts was investigated according to the previous method with some modifications [17].The assay was performed by dissolving collagenase from Clostridium histolyticum (ChC-EC.3.4.23.3) (0.8 U/mL) in 50 mM Tricine buffer (pH 7.5 with 400 mM NaCl and 10 mM CaCl 2 ).The synthetic substrate N-[3-(2-furyl) acryloyl]-Leu-Gly-Pro-Ala (FALGPA) was dissolved in Tricine buffer to obtain a concentration of 2 mM.Briefly, 30 µL of each KG extract solution (0.5 mg/mL in Tricine buffer) was mixed with 60 µL Tricine buffer and 30 µL collagenase.The mixtures were incubated for 10 min at room temperature before adding 60 µL of FALGPA substrate to start the reaction.After that, absorbance at 335 nm was measured immediately and then continuously for 20 min using a microplate reader.Deionized water and epigallocatechin (EGCG) (50 µg/mL) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively.The percentage of inhibition of collagenase activity was calculated by the following equation:

Elastase Inhibitory Activity
Elastase inhibitory activity of KG extracts were assessed following a modified version of a previously established method [17].The elastase assay was performed in 0.2 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0).Porcine pancreatic elastase (PE-E.C.3.4.21.36) (1 mM) and substrate N-Succinyl-Ala-Ala-Ala-p-nitroanilide (AAAPVN) (2.0 mM) were prepared in the buffer.Briefly, a mixture of 20 µL KG extract (0.5 mg/mL), 90 µL of Tris-HCl buffer, and 10 µL of elastase enzyme was preincubated for 5 min at room temperature.After the preincubation, the reaction was initiated by adding 80 µL of substrate and then incubated for 15 min at room temperature.The absorbance was measured at 410 nm using a microplate reader.Deionized water and epigallocatechin (EGCG) (50 µg/mL) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively.The percentage of inhibition of elastase activity was calculated by the following equation:

Determination of Cell Viability
The effects of KG extracts prepared by different extraction solvents on fibroblast cell viability were investigated using the MTT assay [18,19].Briefly, WS-1 cells were seeded at a density of 5.0 × 10 4 cells/well into 96-well plates and incubated overnight at 37 • C with 5% CO 2 .Then, cells were treated with different concentrations (1-100 µg/mL) of each KG extract and incubated for 24 h under the same conditions.After incubation, 20 µL of MTT reagent (5 mg/mL) was added into each well and incubated with 5% CO 2 , at 37 • C for 4 h.Finally, the whole solution was aspirated, and the formazan crystals formed were dissolved with 150 µL of DMSO, and the absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Enspire, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA).Untreated cells cultured in complete medium with 0.1% DMSO were used as a control.The percentage of cell viability was calculated using the following equation: % Cell viability = (OD treated cells /OD untreated cells ) × 100 (5)

Statistical Analysis
All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) based on independent experiments with triplicate samples (n = 3).Parametric data comparison of more than two groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons.The significance level was established at p < 0.05.SPSS V.24 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis.

Effect of Solvent Polarity on Kaempferia galanga Linn. Extraction Yield
Rhizomes of Kaempferia galanga Linn (KG) were extracted using the maceration method, a conventional and cost-effective technique.Four solvents with different polarities, namely, deionized water, absolute ethanol, ethyl acetate, and hexane, were employed to extract diverse bioactive compounds from the KG rhizome.Indeed, the selection of the extraction solvent plays a crucial role in separating a desired chemical substance from herbal materials.The impact of solvent polarity on extraction yield is illustrated in Figure 2. The highest extraction yield was observed with deionized water (6.43%), followed by absolute ethanol (5.30%), ethyl acetate (4.62%), and hexane (3.68%), respectively.The results indicated that extraction yield increases as solvent polarity increases.Likewise, previous studies reported that the polarity of the extraction solvent significantly affected the extraction yield [20][21][22].
herbal materials.The impact of solvent polarity on extraction yield is illustrated in Figure 2. The highest extraction yield was observed with deionized water (6.43%), followed by absolute ethanol (5.30%), ethyl acetate (4.62%), and hexane (3.68%), respectively.The results indicated that extraction yield increases as solvent polarity increases.Likewise, previous studies reported that the polarity of the extraction solvent significantly affected the extraction yield [20][21][22].

Effect of Solvent Polarity on Phytochemical Screening, Total Phenolic Content, and Total Flavonoids Content
The impact of extraction solvents on phytochemical screening (Table 1) revealed the presence of flavonoid, phenolic, and terpenoid compounds in all extraction solvents.However, deionized water and hexane exhibited a lower intensity of color change compared to other solvents, suggesting that these solvents extract the smallest amounts of flavonoids and phenolic compounds from KG rhizome.The phytochemical composition of the KG rhizome aligned with previous studies, primarily consisting of terpenoids, phenolics, diarylheptanoids, and flavonoids.Notably, flavonoid compounds exhibited a lower presence in aqueous extracts compared to hexane and methanol [23,24].Additionally, the phytochemical analysis of the KG extract obtained with alcohol showed the presence of saponin, tannin, phenols, and steroids, while extraction with ethyl acetate and hexane identified steroids and tannins [23].For the extraction of anthocyanins, terpenoids, polypeptide, strarch, phenols, and saponin compounds, water (polarity index = 9.0) was the most effective solvent, whereas polyphenol, flavonols, flavones, and terpenoid compounds were obtained by alcohol extraction (polarity index = 5.2) [25,26].Furthermore, ethyl acetate (polarity index = 4.4) and hexane (polarity index = 0.0) were used to extract alkaloids, steroids, flavonoids, polyphenols, terpenoids, and anthaquinones [23,25].These findings suggest that the solvent polarity affects the qualitative characterization of plants.However, the effects of cultivation, harvesting at different ages, climate, and geographic

Effect of Solvent Polarity on Phytochemical Screening, Total Phenolic Content, and Total Flavonoids Content
The impact of extraction solvents on phytochemical screening (Table 1) revealed the presence of flavonoid, phenolic, and terpenoid compounds in all extraction solvents.However, deionized water and hexane exhibited a lower intensity of color change compared to other solvents, suggesting that these solvents extract the smallest amounts of flavonoids and phenolic compounds from KG rhizome.The phytochemical composition of the KG rhizome aligned with previous studies, primarily consisting of terpenoids, phenolics, diarylheptanoids, and flavonoids.Notably, flavonoid compounds exhibited a lower presence in aqueous extracts compared to hexane and methanol [23,24].Additionally, the phytochemical analysis of the KG extract obtained with alcohol showed the presence of saponin, tannin, phenols, and steroids, while extraction with ethyl acetate and hexane identified steroids and tannins [23].For the extraction of anthocyanins, terpenoids, polypeptide, strarch, phenols, and saponin compounds, water (polarity index = 9.0) was the most effective solvent, whereas polyphenol, flavonols, flavones, and terpenoid compounds were obtained by alcohol extraction (polarity index = 5.2) [25,26].Furthermore, ethyl acetate (polarity index = 4.4) and hexane (polarity index = 0.0) were used to extract alkaloids, steroids, flavonoids, polyphenols, terpenoids, and anthaquinones [23,25].These findings suggest that the solvent polarity affects the qualitative characterization of plants.However, the effects of cultivation, harvesting at different ages, climate, and geographic location may also play a role in the phytochemical compounds and biological activities of KG extracts [27,28].The results of total phenolic and total flavonoid contents aligned with the outcomes of phytochemical screening, as phenolic and flavonoid compounds were found for all solvents (deionized water, absolute ethanol, ethyl acetate, and hexane), independently of polarity (Table 2).The highest flavonoid content was achieved with absolute ethanol, followed by ethyl acetate, hexane, and deionized water, respectively (p < 0.05).The highest phenolic content was obtained by extraction with ethyl acetate, while the lowest was obtained by extraction with deionized water and hexane (p < 0.05).The results show that ethanol and ethyl acetate are the best solvents for extracting flavonoids and phenolic compounds from KG rhizome.Some natural flavonoids (kaempferol, kaempferide, and luteolon) and phenolic compounds (ethyl p-methoxycinnamate, ethyl cinnamate, diarylheptanoid) have been previously identified, as the main phytochemical in KG rhizome [29,30].These components in KG can be effectively extracted with alcohol and ethyl acetate [31].However, the total flavonoid and phenolic compounds depend on the extraction solvent, their solvent polarities, the solubility of compounds in the extraction solvents, and the extraction method [20,32,33].

Effect of Solvent Polarity on Antioxidant Activities of Kaempferia galanga Linn. Extracts
The antioxidant activities of KG extracts were evaluated through three assays measuring their abilities to scavenge free radicals using the DPPH • assay and ABTS +• assay as well as the ability to reduce iron (III) ion (Fe 3+ ) using the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay.The results in Table 3 show that ethanolic extract exhibited the greatest antioxidant activity on both the DPPH • assay with an IC 50 value of 0.612 mg/mL and the FRAP assay with 62 mmol Fe 2+ /g extract (p-value < 0.05).Meanwhile, the aqueous extract showed the highest activity in the ABTS +• assay with 11.853 mg TE/g extract (p < 0.05).The ethanolic extract, characterized by its higher flavonoid and phenolic contents (Table 2), showed the greatest antioxidant potential compared to other extracts which exhibited lower antioxidant potency.As has been reported recently, the DPPH • method gives a better response for mostly phenolic compounds [34].The major components found in KG rhizome were of the flavonoid group and phenolics, which are well-known for their antioxidant potential [35][36][37].Other authors observed that the KG methanolic leaf extract exhibited strong antioxidant activity with an IC 50 value of 0.611 mg/mL (in the DPPH • assay) [38].Our findings are similar to the ones observed in a study performed with Kaempferia angustifolia rhizome, a different plant of the same familia.Different solvents were used for extraction, and tested with the DPPH • scavenging assay, showing similar pattern activities compared to our study [39].The high polarity of methanol allowed for the extraction of more potential antioxidant components from the plant.On the other hand, the antioxidant activity of the extract was decreased by the lower polarity of the solvent used [40], as evidenced by the KG hexane extract showing the lowest antioxidant activity in all experiments due to the low polarity of hexane.

Effect of Solvent Polarity on Anti-Aging Activities of Kaempferia galanga Linn. Extracts
Skin aging is caused by a natural process involving the alteration of dermal connective tissue and is influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic factors.Both factors can induce skin cells to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), which have negative effects on skin cell functions such as collagen and elastin synthesis [1].Collagenase and elastase inhibitory activities are used for assessing anti-aging ability, as collagenase and elastase are responsible for the breakdown of collagen and elastin in the extracellular matrix.The collagenase and elastase inhibitory activity of KG extracts obtained with various solvents of different polarities at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL were investigated and presented in Figures 3 and 4. The highest collagenase inhibitory effect was observed with absolute ethanol used as a solvent (71.83 ± 4.65%), followed by hexane (67.43 ± 1.40%), ethyl acetate (56.08 ± 5.48%), and deionized water (37.61 ± 2.97%), respectively.The inhibitory effect of the KG extracts obtained with absolute ethanol on elastase activity exhibited higher anti-elastase activity (66.35 ± 7.21%) than KG extracts obtained with ethyl acetate (43.39 ± 6.75%) and hexane (45.07 ± 6.51%), respectively.The KG extract obtained with deionized water showed the lowest elastase inhibitory effect (22.70 ± 1.63%).The KG extract obtained with absolute ethanol showed similar results as the positive control epigallocatechin (EGCG) with an anti-collagenase activity of 62.38 ± 3.98% and an anti-elastase activity of 71.74 ± 1.73%.The highest collagenase and elastase inhibitory activities, observed with KG extract obtained with absolute ethanol, may be possibly due to its high total phenolic and total flavonoids content (Table 2), along with potent antioxidant activities compared to other solvents (Table 3).Phenolic compounds exhibited significant in vitro antioxidant activity that is effective in inhibiting free radicals and preventing collagen and elastin degradation, resulting in anti-skin aging effects.The results revealed a positive relation between the antiaging activity and antioxidant activity of KG extracts.Additionally, the effect of different extraction solvents on collagenase and elastase inhibitory activity could be dependent on the part of plant, different stages of harvest, the phytochemical compound in the extract, the concentration of active biological compounds, and their antioxidant activity [15,41,42].

Effect of Solvent Polarity on the Cytotoxicity of Kaempferia galanga Linn. Extracts
Dermal fibroblast cells are the main target for anti-aging therapy, playing a crucial role in producing collagen and elastin for skin homeostasis and morphofunctional organization, thereby contributing to anti-aging effects on the skin [43].The cytotoxicity of all KG rhizome extracts was evaluated on fibroblast cells (WS-1).The WS-1 cell viability after the treatment with KG extracts obtained with different solvents is represented in Figure 5.No cytotoxic effect was observed in fibroblast cells upon exposure to all KG extracts at concentrations ranging from 1 to 25 µg/mL, except for hexane extracts of KG rhizome.However, concentrations higher than 25 µg/mL induced a significant decrease in WS-1 cell viability in a dose-dependent manner (p < 0.05), except for deionized water extracts of KG rhizome which exhibited no cytotoxic effect.Additionally, the KG hexane extract exhibited a higher cytotoxic effect compared to the other extracts.Typically, bioactive phytochemical compounds can be extracted from herbal plants using various solvents of different polarity, especially organic solvents such as hexane, ether, and ethanol [34,44,45]; it is crucial to choose an extraction solvent that is both effective and safe for human use.Thus, concentrations of deionized water and absolute ethanol extracts of KG rhizome less than 50 µg/mL can be considered as permissible limits for applications, especially ethanolic extract due to its higher concentration of polyphenolic and antioxidant and anti-aging activities.

Effect of Solvent Polarity on the Cytotoxicity of Kaempferia galanga Linn. Extracts
Dermal fibroblast cells are the main target for anti-aging therapy, playing a crucial role in producing collagen and elastin for skin homeostasis and morphofunctional organization, thereby contributing to anti-aging effects on the skin [43].The cytotoxicity of all KG rhizome extracts was evaluated on fibroblast cells (WS-1).The WS-1 cell viability after the treatment with KG extracts obtained with different solvents is represented in Figure

Effect of Solvent Polarity on the Cytotoxicity of Kaempferia galanga Linn. Extracts
Dermal fibroblast cells are the main target for anti-aging therapy, playing a crucial role in producing collagen and elastin for skin homeostasis and morphofunctional organization, thereby contributing to anti-aging effects on the skin [43].The cytotoxicity of all KG rhizome extracts was evaluated on fibroblast cells (WS-1).The WS-1 cell viability after the treatment with KG extracts obtained with different solvents is represented in Figure ferent polarity, especially organic solvents such as hexane, ether, and ethanol [34,44,45]; it is crucial to choose an extraction solvent that is both effective and safe for human use.Thus, concentrations of deionized water and absolute ethanol extracts of KG rhizome less than 50 µg/ mL can be considered as permissible limits for applications, especially ethanolic extract due to its higher concentration of polyphenolic and antioxidant and antiaging activities.

Conclusions
The present study explores the in vitro antioxidant, anti-skin aging, and cytotoxic properties on human fibroblasts of Kaempferia galanga Linn.rhizome (KG).The KG extracted using solvents of different polarity revealed that solvents with higher polarity (water, absolute ethanol) present a higher percentage of extraction yield than low polarity solvents (ethyl acetate, hexane).Interestingly, all extraction solvents effectively dissolve secondary metabolites (flavonoids, phenolics, and terpenoid compounds) from KG. Particularly, absolute ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts exhibited higher phenolic and flavonoid contents.Additionally, the high antioxidant activity and anti-aging properties (anticollagenase and anti-elastase activity) of the KG extract are potentially attributed to the high content of flavonoids and phenolic compounds.However, different compound polarities in each of the extraction solvents display various antioxidant mechanisms (free radical scavenging ability and ferric reducing antioxidant power).Cytotoxicity assessment of KG in human fibroblasts found that all extraction solvents were noticeable at a concentration of more than 25 µg/mL in a dose-dependent manner.All findings considered, the ethanolic extract of KG revealed the most effective antioxidant activity,

Conclusions
The present study explores the in vitro antioxidant, anti-skin aging, and cytotoxic properties on human fibroblasts of Kaempferia galanga Linn.rhizome (KG).The KG extracted using solvents of different polarity revealed that solvents with higher polarity (water, absolute ethanol) present a higher percentage of extraction yield than low polarity solvents (ethyl acetate, hexane).Interestingly, all extraction solvents effectively dissolve secondary metabolites (flavonoids, phenolics, and terpenoid compounds) from KG. Particularly, absolute ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts exhibited higher phenolic and flavonoid contents.Additionally, the high antioxidant activity and anti-aging properties (anti-collagenase and anti-elastase activity) of the KG extract are potentially attributed to the high content of flavonoids and phenolic compounds.However, different compound polarities in each of the extraction solvents display various antioxidant mechanisms (free radical scavenging ability and ferric reducing antioxidant power).Cytotoxicity assessment of KG in human fibroblasts found that all extraction solvents were noticeable at a concentration of more than 25 µg/mL in a dose-dependent manner.All findings considered, the ethanolic extract of KG revealed the most effective antioxidant activity, collagenase, and elastase inhibitory effects, with none to low cytotoxicity.Therefore, ethanolic KG extract is suitable for the development of cosmeceutical products geared towards anti-aging applications.

Supplementary Materials:
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cosmetics11030097/s1,Table S1: Raw data of absorbance vs gallic acid concentration, Table S2: Raw data of absorbance vs quercetin concentration, Table S3: Raw data of % DPPH• radical scavenging activity VS sample test (Trolox and KG extract), Table S4: Raw data of absorbance vs FeSO4 concentration, Table S5: Raw data of absorbance vs Trolox concentration, Figure S1: Linearity relationship between absorbance vs concentration of gallic acid, Figure S2: Linearity relationship between absorbance vs concentration of Quercetin, Figure S3: Linearity relationship between absorbance vs concentration of FeSO4 Figure S4.Linearity relationship between absorbance vs concentration of Trolox.

Cosmetics 2024 , 14 Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Collagenase inhibitory activity of KG extracts obtained with solvents of different polarities.The final concentration of the tested samples was 0.5 mg/mL.The values are expressed as the mean ± SD in triplicate experiments.Different alphabet letters indicate a statistically significant difference between solvents (p < 0.05).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Elastase inhibitory activity of KG extracts obtained with solvents of different polarities.The final concentration of the tested samples was 0.5 mg/mL.The values are expressed as the mean ± SD in triplicate experiments.Different alphabet letters indicate a statistically significant difference between solvents (p < 0.05).

Figure 3 . 14 Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Collagenase inhibitory activity of KG extracts obtained with solvents of different polarities.The final concentration of the tested samples was 0.5 mg/mL.The values are expressed as the mean ± SD in triplicate experiments.Different alphabet letters indicate a statistically significant difference between solvents (p < 0.05).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Elastase inhibitory activity of KG extracts obtained with solvents of different polarities.The final concentration of the tested samples was 0.5 mg/mL.The values are expressed as the mean ± SD in triplicate experiments.Different alphabet letters indicate a statistically significant difference between solvents (p < 0.05).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Elastase inhibitory activity of KG extracts obtained with solvents of different polarities.The final concentration of the tested samples was 0.5 mg/mL.The values are expressed as the mean ± SD in triplicate experiments.Different alphabet letters indicate a statistically significant difference between solvents (p < 0.05).

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The cytotoxicity of KG extracts obtained with solvents of different polarity on human fibroblast cells (WS-1).The values are expressed as the mean ± SD in triplicate experiments.The asterisk mark (*) indicates a statistically significant difference at p < 0.05 compared to the control group.Different alphabet letters indicate a statistically significant difference at p < 0.05 among the different solvents.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The cytotoxicity of KG extracts obtained with solvents of different polarity on human fibroblast cells (WS-1).The values are expressed as the mean ± SD in triplicate experiments.The asterisk mark (*) indicates a statistically significant difference at p < 0.05 compared to the control group.Different alphabet letters indicate a statistically significant difference at p < 0.05 among the different solvents.

Table 1 .
Phytochemical screening of KG extracted with different solvents.

Table 2 .
Total flavonoid and total phenolic contents of KG extracts obtained with solvents of different polarities.
cEach value in the table is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3); different alphabet letters indicate a statistically significant difference between treatment groups at p < 0.05.

Table 3 .
Antioxidant activities of KG extracts prepared with solvents of different polarities.