Preparation of Ti – Zr-Based Conversion Coating on 5052 Aluminum Alloy , and Its Corrosion Resistance and Antifouling Performance

Hehong Zhang 1,2, Xiaofeng Zhang 1, Xuhui Zhao 1,*, Yuming Tang 1,* and Yu Zuo 1 1 Beijing Key Laboratory of Electrochemical Process and Technology for Materials, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China; zhanghhmq@163.com (H.Z.); zhangxf@mail.buct.edu.cn (Xi.Z.); zuoy@mail.buct.edu.cn (Y.Z.) 2 China Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute, Beijing 100029, China * Correspondence: xhzhao@mail.buct.edu.cn (Xu.Z.); tangym@mail.buct.edu.cn (Y.T.); Tel.: +86-10-6443-4908 (Xu.Z.); +86-10-6443-4908 (Y.T.)


Introduction
Aluminum alloys are widely used in various fields such as aerospace, automotive, transportation, petrochemical, construction and electronics industries due to their high strength, good thermal and electrical conductivity, good plasticity and lack of magnetism [1,2].However, aluminum alloys have a poor corrosion resistance due to their active chemical property.Additionally, aluminum alloys are vulnerable to pollution by organics, so it is necessary to treat the surface of aluminum alloys before application.Common approaches to improve the corrosion resistance of aluminum alloys include anodic oxidation, electroplating, microarc oxidation, chemical conversion coating and other techniques.Conventional chromate conversion coatings exhibit excellent corrosion resistance and "self-healing" function, but are extremely toxic carcinogens and cause serious environmental pollution [3].The research for chromate conversion coating substitutes has more than 20 years of history, but in the last few years it has become more intense, due to the fact that in 2007 the chromate coatings were banned from European industry except from aeronautics applications that still have a permission to use these treatments.As the ROHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances), ELV (End-of-Life Vehicle) and WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment) regulations launched, hexavalent chromium was strictly limited [4].The research of non-chromate conversion coatings has become a central issue.Numerous non-chromate conversion coatings were investigated, such as a Mo-based conversion coating [4], Ce-based conversion coatings [2,5,6], Ti-based conversion coating [7], Zr-based conversion coating [8], Mn-based conversion coating [9], phosphate conversion coating [10], V-based conversion coating [11], and Ti-Zr-based conversion coating [12].Because of their incomparable advantage of being environmentally friendly, these non-chromate conversion coatings could be used as suitable alternatives.
The Ti-Zr-based conversion coating has a high corrosion resistance and is already applied in industry.Many researchers have pointed out that Ti-Zr-based conversion coatings are optimal to achieve the same performance as the chromate conversion coatings [12][13][14][15][16][17][18].Liu et al. studied on adhesion strength and corrosion resistance of a Ti-Zr aminotrimethylene phosphonic acid composite conversion coating on 7A52 aluminum alloy [12].Nordlienet et al. fabricated Ti/Zr oxide film on AA6060 aluminum alloys and studied the mechanism of film formation [13].Lunder et al. also fabricated a Ti/Zr-based conversion coating on AA6060 aluminum alloys-the results showed that the conversion coating slightly restrained the cathodic activity, but was expected to improve the corrosion resistance of aluminum significantly [14].Guan et al. developed a novel Ti-Zr-based conversion coating on electrogalvanized steel-the corrosion current density of the substrate decreased by two orders of magnitude due to the formation of the coating, which improved the corrosion resistance significantly [15].Yi et al. fabricated a golden Ti-Zr-based conversion coating on AA6063 aluminum alloys; the mechanism of film formation was also discussed.Their results found a reduced corrosion current density and a significantly improved corrosion resistance [16].Coloma et al. developed several Cr-free conversion coatings based on inorganic salts (Zr/Ti/Mn/Mo), which can significantly improve the corrosion resistance of aluminum alloys, although these coatings do not still meet the stringent requirements of the aircraft industry [17].Zhu et al. developed a Ti/Zr/V conversion coating on the surface of aluminum alloy 6063 (AA6063), and reported that its anticorrosion performance and adhesion properties were superior to that of chromate conversion coating [18].However, the traditional Ti-Zr-based conversion treatment is mainly aimed at improving the anticorrosion performance and seldom enhances the antifouling performance.In this work, we developed a Ti-Zr-based conversion coating on 5052 aluminum alloys, using fluorosilane (FAS-17) modification as a post-treatment.The results indicate that both the anticorrosion performance and the antifouling performance of aluminum alloys are improved.
The conversion treatment solution was composed of KMnO 4 : 2-4 g L −1 , NaF: 0.1 g L −1 , K 2 ZrF 6 : 0.25-0.75g L −1 , K 2 TiF 6 : 1-1.5 g L −1 .The pH was about 2, the treatment temperature was in the range of 70-80 • C and the treatment time was about 5 min.The sealing treatment solution was composed of NiSO 4 •6H 2 O: 1.2 g L −1 , NaF: 0.6 g L −1 , the treatment time was about 30 min and treatment temperature was room temperature.After the conversion treatment, the samples were treated in boiling water for about 30 min, then immersed in fluorosilane (FAS-17: 2 g, isopropanol: 180 g, H 2 O: 18 g) at room temperature for about 24 h.The samples were then dried in oven at 120 • C for about 30 min.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S-4700, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used to investigate the surface morphology and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS, Isis 300, Oxford Instrument, Oxfordshire, UK) was used to analyze the chemical composition of the coating.The operating potential Coatings 2018, 8, 397 3 of 11 of the field emission source was 20 kV.The samples were coated with gold to preclude the charging effect during measurement.
A Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR, Tensor27, Bruker Co., Hamburg, Germany) was used to analyze the atomic groups in the coating, and infrared spectra were recorded in absorbance units in the 400-4000 cm −1 range.The spectra of powder samples were tested with KBr pellet method.The scan number was 30 and the spectral resolution was 16 cm −1 .
The surface composition of the coating was then measured via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) with a monochromated Al Kα source (1486.6 eV).The operating pressure was less than 8-10 Pa.The measured binding energy (BE) range for the wide scan spectrum was from 0 to 1350 eV in 1 eV steps without sputtering.The binding energy values were calibrated by the C1s peak at 285 eV.The data were fitted by XPSPEAK v4.1 software.
The corrosive behavior was studied with a weight loss test and polarization measurement.The tests were both carried out in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution.The weight loss test was carried out at 45 • C for 504 h.Specimens for the polarization test were mounted in phenolic resin leaving an exposed area of 1 cm 2 .Polarization measurement was performed using a CS350 electrochemical workstation.The potential scanning range was −0.3-1.5 V relative to the open circuit potential (OCP) and the scanning rate was 10 mV s −1 .The reference electrode was a saturated calomel electrode (SCE), the counter electrode was a Pt electrode and the specimen was a working electrode.
The water contact angles were measured by Dataphysics OCA 20 with a distilled water droplet volume of 4 µL.A simulated pollutant test was carried out to analyze the antifouling performance.The pollutant was a mixture of tallow, liquid paraffin, carbon black, and fluorescent substance.The fluorescent substance in residue was observed by a fluorescence microscope (BX53) after the pollutant was removed from the coating.All the reagents used were of analytic grade.The cleaning rate was calculated through Equation (1).Three trials were performed in order to ensure the accuracy of the test.Average cleaning rate was obtained.
where m 1 : mass of samples before pollutant coated; m 2 : mass of samples after pollutant coated; m 3 : mass of samples after pollutant removed.

Characterizations of the Coating
A compact yellow conversion coating was prepared on the 5052 aluminum alloys after the conversion treatment.Figure 1 shows the surface morphologies of the coating.A continuous, compact and well-covered coating can be seen by comparing Figure 1a,b.The obtained coatings are smooth; however, they became coarse after FAS-17 modification treatment as seen in Figure 1c,d.Some micro-protrudes were generated on the coating surface [19].These micro-protrudes may increase the roughness of the surface and decrease the surface energy, which improves the hydrophobic properties of the coating.All of these characteristics may be related to the antifouling performance of the coating.
Figure 2 shows the EDS spectra of the coating.The conversion coating contains Al, O, F, Mg, Zr, Ti and Mn as shown in Figure 2a.The concentration of Al, Ti and Mn is relatively high, and they may exist in oxide or fluoride states.The concentration of Zr is relatively low, and it is usually covered by other elements [20,21].After the FAS-17 post treatment, C and Si elements emerged (Figure 2b).As is well known, the FAS-17 contains C-F and Si-O atom groups, and the spectrum indicated that a fluorosilane film was produced on the surface of the conversion coating after FAS-17 modification.FT-IR was utilized to analyze the compositions of the coating.Figure 3 shows the FT-IR spectra of the conversion before and after FAS-17 modification.As shown in Figure 3a, the absorption around 3433 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of a hydroxyl group.The characteristic peaks at the range of 2839-2978 cm −1 are assigned to the absorptions of C-H [16,22].The characteristic peak at around 1631 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of Al-O.The characteristic peak at 1409 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of Mn-O.The characteristic peak at 1043 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of S=O in surfactant.The characteristic peak at 859 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of Ti-O and the characteristic peak at 587 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of Al-F [23].A thin fluorosilane film was FT-IR was utilized to analyze the compositions of the coating.Figure 3 shows the FT-IR spectra of the conversion before and after FAS-17 modification.As shown in Figure 3a, the absorption around 3433 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of a hydroxyl group.The characteristic peaks at the range of 2839-2978 cm −1 are assigned to the absorptions of C-H [16,22].The characteristic peak at around 1631 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of Al-O.The characteristic peak at 1409 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of Mn-O.The characteristic peak at 1043 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of S=O in surfactant.The characteristic peak at 859 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of Ti-O and the characteristic peak at 587 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of Al-F [23].A thin fluorosilane film was FT-IR was utilized to analyze the compositions of the coating.Figure 3 shows the FT-IR spectra of the conversion before and after FAS-17 modification.As shown in Figure 3a, the absorption around 3433 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of a hydroxyl group.The characteristic peaks at the range of 2839-2978 cm −1 are assigned to the absorptions of C-H [16,22].The characteristic peak at around 1631 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of Al-O.The characteristic peak at 1409 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of Mn-O.The characteristic peak at 1043 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of S=O in surfactant.The characteristic peak at 859 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of Ti-O and the characteristic peak at 587 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of Al-F [23].A thin fluorosilane film was adhered to the conversion coating by FAS-17 modification.The spectrum shows some new characteristic peaks located in the range of 1050-1205 cm −1 and 1383-1454 cm −1 .The characteristic peaks at the range of 1050-1205 cm −1 are assigned to the absorptions of C-F in CF 3 and CF 2 [24].The characteristic bands at the range of 1383-1454 cm −1 are assigned to the absorptions of CF 3 [23,25,26].The characteristic peak at 1204 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of CF 2 [25].The characteristic peaks at 1050 and 880 cm −1 are assigned to the absorptions of Si-O-C and Si-O, respectively [23,24].
Coatings 2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 11 adhered to the conversion coating by FAS-17 modification.The spectrum shows some new characteristic peaks located in the range of 1050-1205 cm −1 and 1383-1454 cm −1 .The characteristic peaks at the range of 1050-1205 cm −1 are assigned to the absorptions of C-F in CF3 and CF2 [24].The characteristic bands at the range of 1383-1454 cm −1 are assigned to the absorptions of CF3 [23,25,26].
The characteristic peak at 1204 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of CF2 [25].The characteristic peaks at 1050 and 880 cm −1 are assigned to the absorptions of Si-O-C and Si-O, respectively [23,24].
after FAS-17 modification asorbances/a.u.XPS was utilized to characterize the detailed variations of element information on the conversion coating surface.Figure 4a shows the overview XPS spectra of the conversion coating.As illustrated in Figure 4a, the conversion coating is mainly composed of Al, Mn, Ti, F, O and C. The peak of C1s may be attributed to the impurities and surfactant, but considering its low concentration, we omitted to perform a detailed analysis.Figure 4b-f shows the detailed peaks of Al2p, F1s Mn2p, Ti2p, and O1s spectra, respectively.The Al2p core-level spectrum (Figure 4b) can be curve-fitted into three peak components with binding energies at about 76.9, 75.7 and 74.3 eV, which are assigned to AlF3•3H2O, AlOx/Al and Al2O3 [12].The F1s spectrum (Figure 4c) shows only one peak at 686.3eV, corresponding to the AlF3•3H2O [12].The Mn2p peaks (Figure 4d) are composed of three peak structures with binding energies at about 653.5, 642.2 and 641.3 eV; we assign these to the MnO2 [17][18][19].The Ti2p spectrum (Figure 4e) shows two fitted peaks at 464.0 and 458.2 eV corresponding to the TiO2 [16,27].The details of O1s peaks (Figure 4f) reveal three peak structures with binding energies at about 532.4,531.6 and 530.1 eV, which are assigned to the oxides of Ti, Al and Mn, respectively [16].XPS was utilized to characterize the detailed variations of element information on the conversion coating surface.Figure 4a shows the overview XPS spectra of the conversion coating.As illustrated in Figure 4a, the conversion coating is mainly composed of Al, Mn, Ti, F, O and C. The peak of C1s may be attributed to the impurities and surfactant, but considering its low concentration, we omitted to perform a detailed analysis.Figure 4b-f shows the detailed peaks of Al2p, F1s Mn2p, Ti2p, and O1s spectra, respectively.The Al2p core-level spectrum (Figure 4b) can be curve-fitted into three peak components with binding energies at about 76.9, 75.7 and 74.3 eV, which are assigned to AlF 3 •3H 2 O, AlO x /Al and Al 2 O 3 [12].The F1s spectrum (Figure 4c) shows only one peak at 686.3eV, corresponding to the AlF 3 •3H 2 O [12].The Mn2p peaks (Figure 4d) are composed of three peak structures with binding energies at about 653.5, 642.2 and 641.3 eV; we assign these to the MnO 2 [17][18][19].The Ti2p spectrum (Figure 4e) shows two fitted peaks at 464.0 and 458.2 eV corresponding to the TiO 2 [16,27].The details of O1s peaks (Figure 4f) reveal three peak structures with binding energies at about 532.4,531.6 and 530.1 eV, which are assigned to the oxides of Ti, Al and Mn, respectively [16].
Coatings 2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 11 adhered to the conversion coating by FAS-17 modification.The spectrum shows some new characteristic peaks located in the range of 1050-1205 cm −1 and 1383-1454 cm −1 .The characteristic peaks at the range of 1050-1205 cm −1 are assigned to the absorptions of C-F in CF3 and CF2 [24].The characteristic bands at the range of 1383-1454 cm −1 are assigned to the absorptions of CF3 [23,25,26].
The characteristic peak at 1204 cm −1 is assigned to the absorptions of CF2 [25].The characteristic peaks at 1050 and 880 cm −1 are assigned to the absorptions of Si-O-C and Si-O, respectively [23,24].
after FAS-17 modification asorbances/a.u.XPS was utilized to characterize the detailed variations of element information on the conversion coating surface.Figure 4a shows the overview XPS spectra of the conversion coating.As illustrated in Figure 4a, the conversion coating is mainly composed of Al, Mn, Ti, F, O and C. The peak of C1s may be attributed to the impurities and surfactant, but considering its low concentration, we omitted to perform a detailed analysis.Figure 4b-f shows the detailed peaks of Al2p, F1s Mn2p, Ti2p, and O1s spectra, respectively.The Al2p core-level spectrum (Figure 4b) can be curve-fitted into three peak components with binding energies at about 76.9, 75.7 and 74.3 eV, which are assigned to AlF3•3H2O, AlOx/Al and Al2O3 [12].The F1s spectrum (Figure 4c) shows only one peak at 686.3eV, corresponding to the AlF3•3H2O [12].The Mn2p peaks (Figure 4d) are composed of three peak structures with binding energies at about 653.5, 642.2 and 641.3 eV; we assign these to the MnO2 [17][18][19].The Ti2p spectrum (Figure 4e) shows two fitted peaks at 464.0 and 458.2 eV corresponding to the TiO2 [16,27].The details of O1s peaks (Figure 4f) reveal three peak structures with binding energies at about 532.4,531.6 and 530.1 eV, which are assigned to the oxides of Ti, Al and Mn, respectively [16].As described previously, thin fluorosilane films were produced onto the surface of the conversion coating after the FAS-17 modification.The elements on the surface may also change after this step.Figure 5 shows the XPS spectra of the conversion coating after FAS-17 modification.As illustrated in Figure 5a, the intensity of the F1s peak increased and the Si2s and Si2p spectra emerged.The C1s spectrum is composed of six fitted peaks with the binding energies at 294.1, 291.8, 286.14, 285.8, 285.2 and 284.8 eV, which are assigned to the CF3, CF2, C-O, CH3, C-C and CH2 groups, respectively [19,28,29].As described previously, thin fluorosilane films were produced onto the surface of the conversion coating after the FAS-17 modification.The elements on the surface may also change after this step.Figure 5 shows the XPS spectra of the conversion coating after FAS-17 modification.As illustrated in Figure 5a, the intensity of the F1s peak increased and the Si2s and Si2p spectra emerged.The C1s spectrum is composed of six fitted peaks with the binding energies at 294.As described previously, thin fluorosilane films were produced onto the surface of the conversion coating after the FAS-17 modification.The elements on the surface may also change after this step.Figure 5 shows the XPS spectra of the conversion coating after FAS-17 modification.As illustrated in Figure 5a, the intensity of the F1s peak increased and the Si2s and Si2p spectra emerged.The C1s spectrum is composed of six fitted peaks with the binding energies at 294.1, 291.8, 286.14, 285.8, 285.2 and 284.8 eV, which are assigned to the CF3, CF2, C-O, CH3, C-C and CH2 groups, respectively [19,28,29].The results of EDS, FT-IR and XPS show that the main components are AlF 3 •3H 2 O, Al 2 O 3 , MnO 2 and TiO 2 .A thin fluorosilane film formed on the surface of the conversion coating after FAS-17 modification.

Corrosion Resistance of Coating Samples
Figure 6 shows the polarization curves of the substrate before and after conversion treatment.The fitting results are shown in Table 1.It is known that the corrosion current density (I corr ) is one of the most important parameters to evaluate the corrosion resistance of metal substrate [16].A smaller I corr value corresponds to better corrosion resistance.As shown in Figure 6 and Table 1, the I corr decreased to 0.48 µA cm −2 from 1.10 µA cm −2 after conversion treatment, it decreased to 0.04 µA cm −2 after sealing treatment, and it dropped to 0.005 µA cm −2 by FAS-17 modification.The corrosion potential (E corr ) positively shifted from −1196 to −590 mV by conversion treatment and FAS-17 modification.It can be concluded that the corrosion resistance of Al samples was improved significantly by conversion treatment and FAS-17 modification.
Coatings 2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 11 The results of EDS, FT-IR and XPS show that the main components are AlF3•3H2O, Al2O3, MnO2 and TiO2.A thin fluorosilane film formed on the surface of the conversion coating after FAS-17 modification.

Corrosion Resistance of Coating Samples
Figure 6 shows the polarization curves of the substrate before and after conversion treatment.The fitting results are shown in Table 1.It is known that the corrosion current density (Icorr) is one of the most important parameters to evaluate the corrosion resistance of metal substrate [16].A smaller Icorr value corresponds to better corrosion resistance.As shown in Figure 6 and Table 1, the Icorr decreased to 0.48 μA cm −2 from 1.10 μA cm −2 after conversion treatment, it decreased to 0.04 μA cm −2 after sealing treatment, and it dropped to 0.005 μA cm −2 by FAS-17 modification.The corrosion potential (Ecorr) positively shifted from −1196 to −590 mV by conversion treatment and FAS-17 modification.It can be concluded that the corrosion resistance of Al samples was improved significantly by conversion treatment and FAS-17 modification.
A salt water immersion test was utilized to further analyze corrosion resistance of the conversion coating.The results indicated that the corrosion resistance of aluminum alloy substrate was significantly improved by conversion treatment.The corrosion rate of aluminum alloy substrate in 3.5% NaCl solution dropped from 0.240 g•m −2 •h −1 to 0.046 g•m −2 •h −1 , and it further dropped to 0.0118 g m −2 •h −1 after FAS-17 modification.

Antifouling Performance Analysis
It has been reported that the surface is usually hydrophobic after FAS-17 modification [29][30][31][32].Figure 7 shows the contact angle of conversion coating vs water after FAS-17 modification.It can be seen that the contact angle of conversion coating increased from 84.6° to 136.8°; this implies hydrophilicity.A salt water immersion test was utilized to further analyze corrosion resistance of the conversion coating.The results indicated that the corrosion resistance of aluminum alloy substrate was significantly improved by conversion treatment.The corrosion rate of aluminum alloy substrate in 3.5% NaCl solution dropped from 0.240 g•m −2 •h −1 to 0.046 g•m −2 •h −1 , and it further dropped to 0.0118 g•m −2 •h −1 after FAS-17 modification.

Antifouling Performance Analysis
It has been reported that the surface is usually hydrophobic after FAS-17 modification [29][30][31][32].Figure 7 shows the contact angle of conversion coating vs water after FAS-17 modification.It can be seen that the contact angle of conversion coating increased from 84.6 • to 136.8 • ; this implies hydrophilicity.The simulated pollutant test was carried out on the FAS-17-modified coating in order to analyze the antifouling performance.Figure 8 shows the cleaning rate of aluminum alloy samples through different treatments.As shown in Figure 7, the cleaning rate of samples without any treatment, with pretreatment, and with conversion treatment are 91%, 81% and 83%, respectively.Samples have a higher cleaning rate after FAS-17 modification.Taking the corrosion resistance and antifouling performance into account, the latter exhibits better antifouling performance.As is proved previously, a thin fluorosilane film formed on the surface of the conversion coating.Micro-protrudes were generated on the surface and some atom groups such as CF3 and CF2, which can lower the surface energy, were seen; these groups eventually resulted in a hydrophobic surface.The hydrophobic surface improved the antifouling performance of the conversion coating.In order to analyze the antifouling performance intuitively, fluorescence microscopy was used to observe the surface of the conversion coating.Figure 9 shows the fluorescence images of conversion coating.Figure 9a,b are the fluorescence images of aluminum alloy samples after conversion treatment and after FAS-17 modification, respectively.It can be seen from the images that no green fluorescence substance can be detected [33], indicating that the fluorescence substance comes from coated pollutant, not the FAS-17.Figure 9c,d are the fluorescence images of coating after pollutant was removed.By comparing the Figure 9c,d, we observe that the samples after FAS-17 modification have less green fluorescence substance and the brightness is relatively small.These results indicate that there is less pollutant left on the surface of the coating after FAS-17 treatment, corresponding to a better antifouling performance.The simulated pollutant test was carried out on the FAS-17-modified coating in order to analyze the antifouling performance.Figure 8 shows the cleaning rate of aluminum alloy samples through different treatments.As shown in Figure 7, the cleaning rate of samples without any treatment, with pretreatment, and with conversion treatment are 91%, 81% and 83%, respectively.Samples have a higher cleaning rate after FAS-17 modification.Taking the corrosion resistance and antifouling performance into account, the latter exhibits better antifouling performance.As is proved previously, a thin fluorosilane film formed on the surface of the conversion coating.Micro-protrudes were generated on the surface and some atom groups such as CF 3 and CF 2 , which can lower the surface energy, were seen; these groups eventually resulted in a hydrophobic surface.The hydrophobic surface improved the antifouling performance of the conversion coating.The simulated pollutant test was carried out on the FAS-17-modified coating in order to analyze the antifouling performance.Figure 8 shows the cleaning rate of aluminum alloy samples through different treatments.As shown in Figure 7, the cleaning rate of samples without any treatment, with pretreatment, and with conversion treatment are 91%, 81% and 83%, respectively.Samples have a higher cleaning rate after FAS-17 modification.Taking the corrosion resistance and antifouling performance into account, the latter exhibits better antifouling performance.As is proved previously, a thin fluorosilane film formed on the surface of the conversion coating.Micro-protrudes were generated on the surface and some atom groups such as CF3 and CF2, which can lower the surface energy, were seen; these groups eventually resulted in a hydrophobic surface.The hydrophobic surface improved the antifouling performance of the conversion coating.In order to analyze the antifouling performance intuitively, fluorescence microscopy was used to observe the surface of the conversion coating.Figure 9 shows the fluorescence images of conversion coating.Figure 9a,b are the fluorescence images of aluminum alloy samples after conversion treatment and after FAS-17 modification, respectively.It can be seen from the images that no green fluorescence substance can be detected [33], indicating that the fluorescence substance comes from coated pollutant, not the FAS-17.Figure 9c,d are the fluorescence images of coating after pollutant was removed.By comparing the Figure 9c,d, we observe that the samples after FAS-17 modification have less green fluorescence substance and the brightness is relatively small.These results indicate that there is less pollutant left on the surface of the coating after FAS-17 treatment, corresponding to a better antifouling performance.In order to analyze the antifouling performance intuitively, fluorescence microscopy was used to observe the surface of the conversion coating.Figure 9 shows the fluorescence images of conversion coating.Figure 9a,b are the fluorescence images of aluminum alloy samples after conversion treatment and after FAS-17 modification, respectively.It can be seen from the images that no green fluorescence substance can be detected [33], indicating that the fluorescence substance comes from coated pollutant, not the FAS-17.Figure 9c,d are the fluorescence images of coating after pollutant was removed.By comparing the Figure 9c,d, we observe that the samples after FAS-17 modification have less green fluorescence substance and the brightness is relatively small.These results indicate that there is less pollutant left on the surface of the coating after FAS-17 treatment, corresponding to a better antifouling performance.

Conclusions
Conversion coating was prepared on the surface of 5052 aluminum alloys by using K 2 ZrF 6 and K 2 TiF 6 as the main salts, KMnO4 as the oxidant and NaF as the accelerant.The coating was mainly composed of AlF 3 •3H 2 O, Al 2 O 3 , MnO 2 and TiO 2 .
The E corr of aluminum alloy samples after conversion treatment and FAS-17 modification positively shifted about 600 mV.The I corr decreased by about three orders of magnitude, and the corrosion resistance significantly improved.
A thin fluorosilane film formed on the surface of the conversion coating after FAS-17 modification.The surface was hydrophobic and the contact angle reached 136.8 • .The antifouling performance of the conversion coating improved after the FAS-17 modification, corresponding to a cleaning rate of 94%.

2 )Figure 6 .
Figure 6.The polarization curves of 5052 aluminum alloy samples after different treatments.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.The polarization curves of 5052 aluminum alloy samples after different treatments.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.The cleaning rate of 5052 aluminum alloy samples under different treatments.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.The cleaning rate of 5052 aluminum alloy samples under different treatments.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.The cleaning rate of 5052 aluminum alloy samples under different treatments.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Fluorescence microscope images of the coating before and after the pollutant was removed: before pollutant coated (a) after conversion, (b) after FAS-17 modification; after pollutant removed (c) before FAS-17 modification, (d) after FAS-17 modification.

Table 1 .
Fitting results of the polarization curves for 5052 aluminum alloy after different treatments.

Table 1 .
Fitting results of the polarization curves for 5052 aluminum alloy after different treatments.