A Novel Technique for the Deposition of Bismuth Tungstate onto Titania Nanoparticulates for Enhancing the Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity

A novel powder handling technique was used to allow the deposition of bismuth tungstate coatings onto commercial titanium dioxide photocatalytic nanoparticles. The coatings were deposited by reactive pulsed DC magnetron sputtering in an argon/oxygen atmosphere. The use of an oscillating bowl with rotary particle propagation, positioned beneath two closed-field planar magnetrons, provided uniform coverage of the titania particle surfaces. The bismuth/tungsten atomic ratio of the coatings was controlled by varying the power applied to each target. The resulting materials were characterized by X-ray diffraction, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area measurements, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Photocatalytic properties under visible light irradiation were assessed using an acetone degradation test. It was found that deposition of bismuth tungstate onto titania nanoparticles resulted in significant increases in visible light photocatalytic activity, compared to uncoated titania. Of the coatings studied, the highest photocatalytic activity was measured for the sample with a Bi/W atomic ratio of 2/1.


Introduction
In the past few decades, photocatalysis is often reported as a process of choice for the degradation of organic pollutants and surface disinfection.Of the photocatalytic materials known, titanium dioxide, or titania, in anatase form is typically a photocatalyst of choice for various environmental remediation processes due to its low cost, chemical stability, and low toxicity.Titanium dioxide in the form of nanoparticles is much more efficient as a photocatalyst, compared to bulk material, as it provides much higher surface area and therefore higher area of contact with the pollutant.Degussa P25 is reportedly the most widely used photocatalytic material to date.However, despite all the above, TiO 2 possesses some remarkable drawbacks, which limits its potential applications.For example, the relatively high band gap value of TiO 2 (3.2 eV for the anatase phase) means that only the UV part of the spectrum (around 4% of sunlight) can be used for its activation.Moreover, titanium dioxide is characterized with low separation efficiency of the photoexcited charge carriers, which makes its use a rather challenging task for real industrial waste management.Various modifications of titanium dioxide have been proposed to date, with doping with transition metals [1][2][3] and non-metallic [3,4] elements being the most conventional methods.However, the photocatalytic activity of the modified Coatings 2016, 6, 29 2 of 9 materials is often not comparable with that of unmodified TiO 2 due to higher rates of photogenerated charge carrier recombination.
Coupling titanium dioxide with narrow band semiconductors is a method being widely described in publications recently; it typically results in enhancement of the optical adsorption abilities of the material, as well as improved separation of photogenerated charge carriers.Thus, titanium dioxide coupled with such materials, as CdS [5], WO 3 [6], Cu 2 O [7], etc has been reported.Bismuth tungstate (Bi 2 WO 6 ) is gaining increasing popularity as a narrow band gap semiconductor that exhibits good photocatalytic properties under visible light irradiation [8,9].Several successful attempts to couple bismuth tungstate with titanium dioxide have been reported recently [10][11][12].The main preparation methods described are hydrothermal methods [10,[13][14][15], electrospinning [11,16], dip-coating [17], etc.The present study describes the deposition of bismuth tungstate onto titania powders by pulsed DC reactive magnetron sputtering in a single stage process.
Magnetron sputtering is the process of choice for the deposition of a wide range of industrially important functional films [18].Substrates range in size from 6m ˆ3m "jumbo" sheets of architectural glazing to microelectronic components.However, the "line of sight" nature of the process makes it generally unsuited to coating particulates.Sophisticated substrate jigging, planetary rotation, and multiple magnetron systems allow 3D components to be uniformly coated, but the same approach cannot be applied to powders.Rotating drums have been used to tumble small components during the sputter deposition of corrosion resistant coatings to avoid the need for fixturing [19].Abe and co-workers have also published details of a drum-based system for RF sputtering of e.g., Pt coatings onto small charges (2g) of silica particles [20,21], and Poelman, et al. describe a rotating drum for depositing vanadia-based catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane [22].Schmid has published several papers on the use of angled rotating cups positioned under magnetrons, particularly for coating glass microspheres with refractory metals [23,24].Yu, et al. also use an ultrasonic vibration generator in a similar manner to tumble fly-ash cenosphere particles during the deposition of titania [25].The present authors have developed an alternative approach to those described above, which is capable of depositing metallic and ceramic coatings onto larger charges (several 10s of grams, depending on particle density) in a single stage process.

Oscillator Description
The oscillating mechanism used to manipulate the powder came from a vibrating bowl feeder system designed to feed small components from a bowl, around a spiral track at the edge of the bowl and out onto a production line.The original bowl was replaced with a plain flat bottomed bowl of 450 mm in diameter positioned under a pair of co-planar magnetrons which enabled sputtering from two targets (Bi and W in our case) simultaneously.The charge of powder is placed in the bowl and the whole assembly was installed in the vacuum chamber directly underneath the magnetrons, giving a target to substrate separation of 120 mm.This arrangement is shown schematically in Figure 1.The bowl oscillates vertically at 50 Hz, but springs connected between the electromagnet and the base plate are designed to also impart a lateral twisting moment to the oscillation.The resulting motion causes particles in the bowl to roll or hop in a circular path around the bottom of the bowl and, thus, over time all surfaces of the particles are exposed to the coating flux.Coating uniformity and thickness are functions of run time, target power and deposition rate (material arrival rate parameters), particle size and shape, and the charge of powder in the bowl (surface area parameters).This system is distinctly different to those reported elsewhere, since the particles in our system are not only oscillated vertically, but also tumble horizontally around the bowl.

Deposition Conditions
The bismuth tungstate coatings were deposited in a vacuum coating system that included two 300mm × 100mm planar unbalanced type II magnetrons installed through the chamber roof facing the oscillator bowl in a closed field sputter-down configuration.The bismuth target was fitted to one of the magnetrons, and the tungsten target to the other one (both targets were 99.5% pure and bonded to copper backing plates).The targets were sputtered in reactive mode in an argon/oxygen atmosphere, at a partial pressure of 0.4 Pa.The flow of gases was controlled using mass-flow controllers (10 sccm of Ar and 20 sccm of O2).The magnetrons were powered in pulsed DC mode using a dual channel Advanced Energy Pinnacle Plus (Fort Collins, CO, USA) power supply; a pulse frequency of 100 kHz and duty cycle of 50% (synchronous mode) were used for all the deposition runs.The powers applied to the targets were varied to produce a range of Bi/W contents in the films (100-200 W for Bi and 400-450 W for W).A 10 g charge of titania particles was used (PC500 TiO2 from Crystal Global, Grimsby, UK with individual particle sizes of 5-10 nm).Deposition time was 1 hour for all the coatings studied.Substrate temperature during the deposition was estimated as 60-65 °C.

Analytical Techniques
The X-ray diffraction analysis of the samples was carried out using a Panalytical Xpert diffractometer with CuKa1 radiation at 0.154 nm over a scan range from 20° to 70° 2; the accelerating voltage and applied current were 40 kV and 30 mA, respectively.The composition of the powders was determined using EDX (EDAX-Trident on a Zeiss Supra 40 FEGSEM, Edax Co., Mahwah, NJ, USA).The specific surface areas of the materials were determined with Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area measurements using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 system (Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, Norcross, GA, USA), where samples were degassed for 12 h at 300 °C prior to analysis and surface areas were calculated from nitrogen adsorption data in the range of relative pressures between 0.05 and 0.3 using the BET model.Optical properties of the materials were determined from UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectra recorded with an Ocean Optics USB4000 spectrometer equipped with a diffuse reflectance probe (Ocean Optics, Dunedin, FL, USA).Selected samples have also been analysed with a TEM (FEI Tecnai FEGTEM Field Emission gun TEM/STEM fitted with HAADF detector, FEI, Cambridge, UK).

Evaluation of Photocatalytic Activity
The assessment of photocatalytic properties was carried out using an acetone degradation test in a purpose-built reaction cell equipped with a quartz glass window.The fixed amount of photocatalyst (1 g) was evenly spread over a 55 mm glass plate and placed into the reaction cell; 1 mL of liquid acetone was introduced to the cell with a syringe.As carbon dioxide is one of the products of photocatalytic acetone degradation, a CO2 detector (Vaisala CARBOCAP ® carbon dioxide meter, Vaisala, Vantaa, Finland, used with a Vaisala GM70 2000 ppm probe) was incorporated into the

Deposition Conditions
The bismuth tungstate coatings were deposited in a vacuum coating system that included two 300mm ˆ100mm planar unbalanced type II magnetrons installed through the chamber roof facing the oscillator bowl in a closed field sputter-down configuration.The bismuth target was fitted to one of the magnetrons, and the tungsten target to the other one (both targets were 99.5% pure and bonded to copper backing plates).The targets were sputtered in reactive mode in an argon/oxygen atmosphere, at a partial pressure of 0.4 Pa.The flow of gases was controlled using mass-flow controllers (10 sccm of Ar and 20 sccm of O 2 ).The magnetrons were powered in pulsed DC mode using a dual channel Advanced Energy Pinnacle Plus (Fort Collins, CO, USA) power supply; a pulse frequency of 100 kHz and duty cycle of 50% (synchronous mode) were used for all the deposition runs.The powers applied to the targets were varied to produce a range of Bi/W contents in the films (100-200 W for Bi and 400-450 W for W).A 10 g charge of titania particles was used (PC500 TiO 2 from Crystal Global, Grimsby, UK with individual particle sizes of 5-10 nm).Deposition time was 1 hour for all the coatings studied.Substrate temperature during the deposition was estimated as 60-65 ˝C.

Analytical Techniques
The X-ray diffraction analysis of the samples was carried out using a Panalytical Xpert diffractometer with CuKa1 radiation at 0.154 nm over a scan range from 20 ˝to 70 ˝2θ; the accelerating voltage and applied current were 40 kV and 30 mA, respectively.The composition of the powders was determined using EDX (EDAX-Trident on a Zeiss Supra 40 FEGSEM, Edax Co., Mahwah, NJ, USA).The specific surface areas of the materials were determined with Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area measurements using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 system (Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, Norcross, GA, USA), where samples were degassed for 12 h at 300 ˝C prior to analysis and surface areas were calculated from nitrogen adsorption data in the range of relative pressures between 0.05 and 0.3 using the BET model.Optical properties of the materials were determined from UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectra recorded with an Ocean Optics USB4000 spectrometer equipped with a diffuse reflectance probe (Ocean Optics, Dunedin, FL, USA).Selected samples have also been analysed with a TEM (FEI Tecnai FEGTEM Field Emission gun TEM/STEM fitted with HAADF detector, FEI, Cambridge, UK).

Evaluation of Photocatalytic Activity
The assessment of photocatalytic properties was carried out using an acetone degradation test in a purpose-built reaction cell equipped with a quartz glass window.The fixed amount of photocatalyst (1 g) was evenly spread over a 55 mm glass plate and placed into the reaction cell; 1 mL of liquid acetone was introduced to the cell with a syringe.As carbon dioxide is one of the products of photocatalytic acetone degradation, a CO 2 detector (Vaisala CARBOCAP ® carbon dioxide meter, Vaisala, Vantaa, Finland, used with a Vaisala GM70 2000 ppm probe) was incorporated into the reaction cell to measure CO 2 concentration over time.The reaction cell was kept in the dark for 30 min at room temperature to reach the adsorption-desorption equilibrium, then irradiation with the simulated visible light source (Sunlite 8 W white LED, combined with a 395 nm long pass filter from Knight Optical) for a total time of 1 h.The emission spectrum of the irradiation source used for photocatalytic testing was recorded with Ocean Optics USB400 spectrometer and presented in Figure 2. Uncoated PC500 titania was analysed with all the techniques above for comparison purposes.
Coatings 2016, 6, 29 4 of 9 reaction cell to measure CO2 concentration over time.The reaction cell was kept in the dark for 30 min at room temperature to reach the adsorption-desorption equilibrium, then irradiation with the simulated visible light source (Sunlite 8 W white LED, combined with a 395 nm long pass filter from Knight Optical) for a total time of 1 h.The emission spectrum of the irradiation source used for photocatalytic testing was recorded with Ocean Optics USB400 spectrometer and presented in Figure 2. Uncoated PC500 titania was analysed with all the techniques above for comparison purposes.

Samples Overview and Composition
The overview of the samples studied is given in the Table 1.According to the results of EDX mapping (images of the EDX maps are not given here), bismuth and tungsten were evenly distributed on the surface of the titania particles, which confirms the efficiency of the method proposed for coating the nanoparticles.
As can be seen from the data presented in Table 1, variation of the power applied to the bismuth and tungsten targets resulted in variations in coating composition, in a similar manner to the deposition of bismuth complex oxides onto flat substrates reported earlier [26,27].BET surface area measurements of PC500 titania were in good agreement with the manufacturer's information of 350 m 2 /g.BET surface areas of the coated samples showed reductions in the surface area with deposition of bismuth tungstate onto the titania particles, as the ratio of Bi/W decreased, i.e., as the W content increased.This can be explained by the observed increasing agglomeration of the particles as a function of tungsten content.

XRD
The XRD spectra of the coatings are given in Figure 3.It can be seen that only peaks corresponding to the anatase TiO2 appear on the spectra (JCPDS: 21-1272).This is most likely due to the fact that the content of bismuth tungstate is rather low, and it is under the sensitivity threshold of XRD.No significant changes in crystallinity of TiO2 occurred after deposition of bismuth tungstate,

Samples Overview and Composition
The overview of the samples studied is given in the Table 1.According to the results of EDX mapping (images of the EDX maps are not given here), bismuth and tungsten were evenly distributed on the surface of the titania particles, which confirms the efficiency of the method proposed for coating the nanoparticles.
As can be seen from the data presented in Table 1, variation of the power applied to the bismuth and tungsten targets resulted in variations in coating composition, in a similar manner to the deposition of bismuth complex oxides onto flat substrates reported earlier [26,27].BET surface area measurements of PC500 titania were in good agreement with the manufacturer's information of 350 m 2 /g.BET surface areas of the coated samples showed reductions in the surface area with deposition of bismuth tungstate onto the titania particles, as the ratio of Bi/W decreased, i.e., as the W content increased.This can be explained by the observed increasing agglomeration of the particles as a function of tungsten content.

XRD
The XRD spectra of the coatings are given in Figure 3.It can be seen that only peaks corresponding to the anatase TiO 2 appear on the spectra (JCPDS: 21-1272).This is most likely due to the fact that the content of bismuth tungstate is rather low, and it is under the sensitivity threshold of XRD.No significant changes in crystallinity of TiO 2 occurred after deposition of bismuth tungstate, with (101) remaining the predominant crystal plane.Broad diffraction peaks were observed, which is evidence that that crystal grains are in the nanoscale range.Crystallite sizes listed in Table 1 were estimated using the Scherrer equation and varied in the range 7-10 nm (as given in Table 1).Crystallite sizes did not change significantly with bismuth tungstate deposition, however it should be noted that they were calculated based on the anatase (101) titania peak only, therefore these values are given here just for estimation purposes.
with (101) remaining the predominant crystal plane.Broad diffraction peaks were observed, which is evidence that that crystal grains are in the nanoscale range.Crystallite sizes listed in Table 1 were estimated using the Scherrer equation and varied in the range 7-10 nm (as given in Table 1).Crystallite sizes did not change significantly with bismuth tungstate deposition, however it should be noted that they were calculated based on the anatase (101) titania peak only, therefore these values are given here just for estimation purposes.

Band Gap Calculation
The absorbance data of the samples are plotted in Figure 4.The band gaps values were estimated using Tauc plots of [F(R) hυ] 0.5 versus hυ, where F(R) is the Kubelka-Munk function, and hυ is the incident photon energy.The calculated band gaps of the powders are given in the Table 1.As expected, uncoated PC500 titania exhibits absorption in the UV range only (below 395 nm), which is in good agreement with literature data on its band gap (typically reported as 3.2 eV [28]), while for bismuth tungstate-coated particles the absorption is clearly shifted towards the visible range.The highest red shift is observed for the sample BWO3.Therefore, all of the coated samples demonstrated band gap values sufficient to be activated with the light source chosen.

Band Gap Calculation
The absorbance data of the samples are plotted in Figure 4.The band gaps values were estimated using Tauc plots of [F(R) hυ] 0.5 versus hυ, where F(R) is the Kubelka-Munk function, and hυ is the incident photon energy.The calculated band gaps of the powders are given in the Table 1.As expected, uncoated PC500 titania exhibits absorption in the UV range only (below 395 nm), which is in good agreement with literature data on its band gap (typically reported as 3.2 eV [28]), while for bismuth tungstate-coated particles the absorption is clearly shifted towards the visible range.The highest red shift is observed for the sample BWO3.Therefore, all of the coated samples demonstrated band gap values sufficient to be activated with the light source chosen.

TEM Results
The microstructures of plain and coated titania particles were further studied by TEM and high resolution (HR) TEM.Representative examples of TEM and high resolution TEM images of coated and uncoated titania powders are presented in Figure 5. Figures 5a and c show the typical TEM images of uncoated PC500 titania and coated sample BWO2 particles, respectively.It is obvious from the image that titania particles are agglomerated for both coated and uncoated samples; titania agglomerates in Figure 5c are coated uniformly.Lattice fringes can be clearly observed on both of the HRTEM images (Figure 5b,d), and they were used for identification of the crystal planes of the samples.On Figure 5b, the fringe spacing was estimated as 0.35 nm, which corresponds to the (101) plane of anatase titania, and is in good agreement with XRD data presented in Figure 3. Fringe spacing on Figure 5d was ca.0.315 nm, which can be attributed to (131) plane of bismuth tungstate Bi2WO6 (JCPDS: 39256) [10].It is worth noting that the as-deposited bismuth tungstate was in crystalline form, without any further thermal treatment applied to the samples.

TEM Results
The microstructures of plain and coated titania particles were further studied by TEM and high resolution (HR) TEM.Representative examples of TEM and high resolution TEM images of coated and uncoated titania powders are presented in Figure 5. Figure 5a,c show the typical TEM images of uncoated PC500 titania and coated sample BWO2 particles, respectively.It is obvious from the image that titania particles are agglomerated for both coated and uncoated samples; titania agglomerates in Figure 5c are coated uniformly.Lattice fringes can be clearly observed on both of the HRTEM images (Figure 5b,d), and they were used for identification of the crystal planes of the samples.On Figure 5b, the fringe spacing was estimated as 0.35 nm, which corresponds to the (101) plane of anatase titania, and is in good agreement with XRD data presented in Figure 3. Fringe spacing on Figure 5d was ca.0.315 nm, which can be attributed to (131) plane of bismuth tungstate Bi 2 WO 6 (JCPDS: 39256) [10].It is worth noting that the as-deposited bismuth tungstate was in crystalline form, without any further thermal treatment applied to the samples.

TEM Results
The microstructures of plain and coated titania particles were further studied by TEM and high resolution (HR) TEM.Representative examples of TEM and high resolution TEM images of coated and uncoated titania powders are presented in Figure 5. Figures 5a and c show the typical TEM images of uncoated PC500 titania and coated sample BWO2 particles, respectively.It is obvious from the image that titania particles are agglomerated for both coated and uncoated samples; titania agglomerates in Figure 5c are coated uniformly.Lattice fringes can be clearly observed on both of the HRTEM images (Figure 5b,d), and they were used for identification of the crystal planes of the samples.On Figure 5b, the fringe spacing was estimated as 0.35 nm, which corresponds to the (101) plane of anatase titania, and is in good agreement with XRD data presented in Figure 3. Fringe spacing on Figure 5d was ca.0.315 nm, which can be attributed to (131) plane of bismuth tungstate Bi2WO6 (JCPDS: 39256) [10].It is worth noting that the as-deposited bismuth tungstate was in crystalline form, without any further thermal treatment applied to the samples.

Photocatalytic Activity Measurement
The photocatalytic activity of the coated and uncoated titania particles under the visible light source (λ > 395 nm) was evaluated using the acetone degradation test.The photocatalytic decomposition process of acetone can be summarised using the following equation: Therefore, CO 2 concentration was recorded as an indication of photocatalytic activity over a 1-hour period.The first order linear relationship was revealed by plotting ln(C t /C t=0 ) as a function of irradiation time, where C t=0 is the initial concentration of carbon dioxide, and C t is the CO 2 concentration at the irradiation time t.The values of the rate constants calculated per unit of surface area are given in the Table 1, and the CO 2 evolution kinetics are presented in Figure 6.The results of the blank test (no photocatalyst) and TiO 2 PC500 in dark conditions are given for reference purpose.It is clear from Figure 6 that the deposition of bismuth tungstate onto titanium dioxide particles significantly increased photocatalytic activity under visible light.Not surprisingly, the photocatalytic activity of PC500 titania in this case was very low, due to the relatively high value of its band gap.Of the samples studied, the highest level of activity was recorded for the coating BWO2, nevertheless the band gap value of this sample was not the lowest of those tested here.The lower photocatalytic activity of sample BWO3, despite its lower band gap, can possibly be explained by the presence of amorphous tungsten in this tungsten-rich sample, which could inhibit the photoactivity [26].

Photocatalytic Activity Measurement
The photocatalytic activity of the coated and uncoated titania particles under the visible light source (λ > 395 nm) was evaluated using the acetone degradation test.The photocatalytic decomposition process of acetone can be summarised using the following equation: Therefore, CO2 concentration was recorded as an indication of photocatalytic activity over a 1-hour period.The first order linear relationship was revealed by plotting ln(Ct/Ct=0) as a function of irradiation time, where Ct=0 is the initial concentration of carbon dioxide, and Ct is the CO2 concentration at the irradiation time t.The values of the rate constants calculated per unit of surface area are given in the Table 1, and the CO2 evolution kinetics are presented in Figure 6.The results of the blank test (no photocatalyst) and TiO2 PC500 in dark conditions are given for reference purpose.It is clear from Figure 6 that the deposition of bismuth tungstate onto titanium dioxide particles significantly increased photocatalytic activity under visible light.Not surprisingly, the photocatalytic activity of PC500 titania in this case was very low, due to the relatively high value of its band gap.Of the samples studied, the highest level of activity was recorded for the coating BWO2, nevertheless the band gap value of this sample was not the lowest of those tested here.The lower photocatalytic activity of sample BWO3, despite its lower band gap, can possibly be explained by the presence of amorphous tungsten in this tungsten-rich sample, which could inhibit the photoactivity [26].It should be noted that, at this stage of the work, it is not known whether the observed increase of visible light photocatalytic activity is solely due to the red shift of the band gap and more efficient charge carrier separation of the composite material, rather than the intrinsic photocatalytic properties of bismuth tungstate that are often reported.Further studies aimed at obtaining a better understanding of photocatalytic degradation mechanisms and coating optimisation are currently in progress.It should be noted that, at this stage of the work, it is not known whether the observed increase of visible light photocatalytic activity is solely due to the red shift of the band gap and more efficient charge carrier separation of the composite material, rather than the intrinsic photocatalytic properties of bismuth tungstate that are often reported.Further studies aimed at obtaining a better understanding of photocatalytic degradation mechanisms and coating optimisation are currently in progress.

Conclusions
In summary, the present work shows that the new coating technique described here is suitable for functionalizing photocatalytic nanoparticulates by magnetron sputtering.Bismuth tungstate coatings were successfully deposited onto a commercial titania photocatalyst; variation of target powers allowed deposition of crystalline coatings of different compositions.The use of an oscillating bowl as a substrate holder enables uniform distribution of bismuth tungstate coatings on the titania powders.Deposition of bismuth tungstate resulted in significant increases in visible light photocatalytic activity compared to unmodified titania.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Schematic representation of powder coating sputtering rig in dual co-planar configuration.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Schematic representation of powder coating sputtering rig in dual co-planar configuration.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Spectrum of the fluorescent light source used for photocatalytic testing (with UV filter).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Spectrum of the fluorescent light source used for photocatalytic testing (with UV filter).

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. XRD spectra of bismuth tungsten oxide-coated and uncoated titania particles (anatase titania peaks marked as A).

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. XRD spectra of bismuth tungsten oxide-coated and uncoated titania particles (anatase titania peaks marked as A).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. UV-visible absorbance spectra of bismuth tungstate-coated and uncoated titania particles.Insert shows calculation of the band gap with Tauc plot on the example of sample BWO3 (BG = 2.99 eV).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. UV-visible absorbance spectra of bismuth tungstate-coated and uncoated titania particles.Insert shows calculation of the band gap with Tauc plot on the example of sample BWO3 (BG = 2.99 eV).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. UV-visible absorbance spectra of bismuth tungstate-coated and uncoated titania particles.Insert shows calculation of the band gap with Tauc plot on the example of sample BWO3 (BG = 2.99 eV).

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. (a) TEM images of PC500 titania; (b) high resolution TEM image of PC500 titania; (c) TEM image of sample BWO2; (d) high resolution TEM image of sample BWO2.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. (a) TEM images of PC500 titania; (b) high resolution TEM image of PC500 titania; (c) TEM image of sample BWO2; (d) high resolution TEM image of sample BWO2.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.CO2 evolution kinetics in contact with bismuth tungstate-coated and uncoated titania samples under visible light irradiation.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.CO 2 evolution kinetics in contact with bismuth tungstate-coated and uncoated titania samples under visible light irradiation.

Table 1 .
Overview of the properties of bismuth tungstate-coated and uncoated titania powders.

Table 1 .
Overview of the properties of bismuth tungstate-coated and uncoated titania powders.