Self-Standing Soft Carbon-Coated MoS 2 Nanoﬁber Film Anode for Superior Potassium Storage

: The poor electronic conductivity and large volume expansion effect of MoS 2 limit its application in potassium-ion batteries (PIBs). In addition to exploring effective modiﬁcation methods, it is also necessary to build a new self-standing electrode system to improve its energy density. In this work, based on the potassium storage advantages and disadvantages of MoS 2 and carbon nanoﬁbers, we have successfully prepared a self-standing soft carbon-coated MoS 2 nanoﬁber ﬁlm electrode without any additives or metal collectors. As for the application in PIBs, it exhibits excellent rate performances (about 93 mA h g − 1 at the current density of 10 A g − 1 ), and superior long-term cycling stability performances (a high-capacity retention of ~75% after 1800 cycles at the current density of 1 A g − 1 ). The enhanced potassium storage performance can be attributed to the unique self-standing nanoﬁber ﬁlm architectures.


Introduction
With the widespread use of electronic products, and the growing popularity of new energy vehicles, the demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has been unprecedented.However, the global lithium resources are scarce and unevenly distributed.Moreover, the current immature battery recycling mechanism inevitably affects its cost and supply and demand [1].To solve this problem, developing batteries with abundant resources and at a low cost is both urgent and effective.Among them, the potassium-ion batteries (PIBs), which have a similar energy storage mechanism to the LIBs, have received special attention [2][3][4].Potassium is much more abundant on the earth than lithium.As compared with sodium-ion batteries (SIBs), PIBs have some unique energy storage advantages.The standard electrode potential of potassium is −2.93 V (vs.SHE), which is close to lithium (−3.04 V vs. SHE) and higher than sodium (−2.71V vs. SHE), meaning PIBs have a higher potential energy density than SIBs [5].In addition, potassium can form stable intercalation compounds with graphite, while sodium is difficult to insert into graphite.[6,7] As far as the anode electrode of PIBs is concerned, its research is still in the initial stage [8].The excellent potassium storage anodes have characteristics similar to those of LIBs and SIBs.However, as the size of a K-ion (0.138 nm) is larger than that of a Na-ion (0.102 nm) and a Li-ion (0.076 nm), the larger potassium ion radius will result in slow ion diffusion kinetics [7,9].According to the different potassium storage mechanisms, the anodes can be classified into three categories: alloy-type, conversion-type, and intercalationtype [10][11][12][13].Among them, the conversion-type MoS 2 shows great structural advantages in potassium storage applications [14][15][16].MoS 2 combines 2D monolayers formed by bonded Mo and S atoms, with a weak van der Waals force.Anisotropic structure provides MoS 2 with a large number of reaction sites and 2D channels to boost ion insertion/extraction and rapid electron transfer [17].However, its poor electronic conductivity and large volume expansion effect still limit its application in PIBs.Exploring excellent modification strategies is still a hot topic [18][19][20].Additionally, in order to prepare an anode with excellent potassium storage performances, in addition to selecting a high-performance anode system, it is also necessary to build a new electrode system that is self-standing and free of adhesives, conductive additives, and metal collectors [21].For the anode electrode, if taking the weight of the binder, the conductive agent, and the metal collector into account, its actual specific capacity will be very low [22], which will seriously restrict the energy density of the whole battery.In view of the significant advantages of MoS 2 in potassium storage, it is a challenging research topic to explore the construction method of high-performance self-standing electrodes.
In this work, we are committed to designing a self-standing MoS 2 -based anode without any additives or metal collectors for the applications in PIBs.This work will explore self-standing framework and effective carbon modification strategies by combining electrospinning and hydrothermal methods.

Materials and Methods
Synthesis of CNFs: Firstly, we can prepare the electrospinning solution by mixing the 0.6 g of PAN (polyacrylonitrile) and 8 mL of DMF (N, N-Dimethylformamide).Then, the precursor carbon nanofibers (CNFs) can be obtained using the electrospinning method.The final CNFs are obtained by heating it in air at 250 • C for 3 h, then at 700 • C for 5 h under an argon atmosphere.
Synthesis of MoS 2 @CNFs and pure MoS 2 NS: Typically, an aqueous solution (30 mL) for the reaction was prepared by mixing 0.08 g of ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate, 0.09 g of thiourea, and 0.15 g of PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidone).Then, the appropriate amount of the as-prepared CNFs film was added into the above aqueous solution.The hydrothermal reaction conditions were set at 200 • C for 24 h.Then, the generated sample was washed and dried, and finally annealed at 700 • C for 5 h under an argon atmosphere.The pure MoS 2 nanospheres (NS) can be prepared in the absence of CNFs.
Synthesis of MoS 2 @CNFs@C: Typically, the appropriate amount of the as-prepared MoS 2 @CNFs film was immersed in the glucose (20 mg) aqueous solution (30 mL), and then hydrothermally reacted at 180 • C for 12 h.Then, the generated sample was washed and dried.The final MoS 2 @CNFs@C can be obtained by heating it at 700 • C for 5 h under an argon atmosphere.Note that polyacrylonitrile and the other reagents were purchased from commercial sources of Aldrich and Aladdin, respectively, which are directly used without any further purification.
Characterization methods: The phase structure of samples was checked using X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku, Japan).The surface morphologies of the as-prepared samples were studied using a scanning electron microscopy (SEM, SU8010, Hitachi, Japan).
Electrochemical tests: Except for the pure MoS 2 NS, the other samples were directly utilized as the working electrode in the absence of additives and metal current collectors.The pure MoS 2 NS electrode was prepared through a traditional coating process.A mixed slurry (8:1:1 by weight) of active material, carbon black, and polyvinylidene fluoride was coated on a Cu foil, and then dried at 100 • C under vacuum condition.The potassium metal disk was utilized as to counter and reference electrodes.The glass fiber membrane and the 0.8 M KPF 6 solution in a 1:1 (by volume) mixture of EC and DEC were used as the separator and the electrolytes, respectively.A two-electrode coin cell was fabricated in a glove box under an argon atmosphere with 0.1 ppm moisture and oxygen content.The galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) data were investigated by battery testing instruments in the current density range of 0.1-10 A g −1 .

Results and Discussion
Figure 1 schematically shows the typical preparation procedures of the MoS 2 @CNFs@C sample.Firstly, the CNFs can be obtained by optimizing the electrospinning conditions.As we know, owing to the wide layer spacing and large degree of disorder, hard carbon is conducive to the intercalation of potassium ions [23][24][25].The carbon nanofibers derived from electrospinning can be used as the framework for preparing self-standing electrode.By using the hydrothermal technique and PVP, MoS 2 nanospheres (NS) can uniformly anchor to the surface of CNFs.Finally, with the aid of hydrothermal and annealing treatments, the surface of MoS 2 @CNFs will be coated with soft carbon layers derived from the glucose.Such a structural design will not only effectively improve the electronic conductivity of the material but will also obtain a potassium storage electrode without any additives or metal collectors, which can be used directly to assemble a two-electrode coin-cell.
Coatings 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 7 electrospinning conditions.As we know, owing to the wide layer spacing and large degree of disorder, hard carbon is conducive to the intercalation of potassium ions [23][24][25].
The carbon nanofibers derived from electrospinning can be used as the framework for preparing self-standing electrode.By using the hydrothermal technique and PVP, MoS2 nanospheres (NS) can uniformly anchor to the surface of CNFs.Finally, with the aid of hydrothermal and annealing treatments, the surface of MoS2@CNFs will be coated with soft carbon layers derived from the glucose.Such a structural design will not only effectively improve the electronic conductivity of the material but will also obtain a potassium storage electrode without any additives or metal collectors, which can be used directly to assemble a two-electrode coin-cell.As shown in Figure 2, the phase structures of the samples are checked by XRD.It can be seen that the pure MoS2 NS sample shows the characteristic (100) and (110) diffraction peaks.The MoS2@CNFs exhibits the characteristic XRD peaks of MoS2 without any impure phase, indicating the successful combination of MoS2 and CNFs.After carbon coating, as compared with MoS2@CNFs, no obvious differences in the XRD patterns are observed for MoS2@CNFs@C, suggesting the effective carbon modification strategy.As shown in Figure 2, the phase structures of the samples are checked by XRD.It can be seen that the pure MoS 2 NS sample shows the characteristic (100) and (110) diffraction peaks.The MoS 2 @CNFs exhibits the characteristic XRD peaks of MoS 2 without any impure phase, indicating the successful combination of MoS 2 and CNFs.After carbon coating, as compared with MoS 2 @CNFs, no obvious differences in the XRD patterns are observed for MoS 2 @CNFs@C, suggesting the effective carbon modification strategy.
electrospinning conditions.As we know, owing to the wide layer spacing and large de gree of disorder, hard carbon is conducive to the intercalation of potassium ions [23][24][25] The carbon nanofibers derived from electrospinning can be used as the framework fo preparing self-standing electrode.By using the hydrothermal technique and PVP, MoS nanospheres (NS) can uniformly anchor to the surface of CNFs.Finally, with the aid o hydrothermal and annealing treatments, the surface of MoS2@CNFs will be coated with soft carbon layers derived from the glucose.Such a structural design will not only effec tively improve the electronic conductivity of the material but will also obtain a potassium storage electrode without any additives or metal collectors, which can be used directly to assemble a two-electrode coin-cell.As shown in Figure 2, the phase structures of the samples are checked by XRD.It can be seen that the pure MoS2 NS sample shows the characteristic (100) and (110) diffraction peaks.The MoS2@CNFs exhibits the characteristic XRD peaks of MoS2 without any impure phase, indicating the successful combination of MoS2 and CNFs.After carbon coating, a compared with MoS2@CNFs, no obvious differences in the XRD patterns are observed fo MoS2@CNFs@C, suggesting the effective carbon modification strategy.3 shows the SEM images of samples.For CNFs, it can be seen that a network structure is formed by lots of nanofibers (shown in Figure 3a).After hydrothermal and annealing treatment, the MoS 2 NS are uniformly loaded onto the surface of CNFs (shown in Figure 3b).After carbon modification, MoS 2 @CNFs@C can maintain the morphology structure similar to MoS 2 @CNFs (shown in Figure 3c).In addition, Figure 3d shows the typical nanosheet stacking structure of a pure MoS 2 NS, which presents a nanosphere morphology.Such an assembly structure can be expected to exhibit enhanced potassium storage performances.
Coatings 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 7 Figure 3 shows the SEM images of samples.For CNFs, it can be seen that a network structure is formed by lots of nanofibers (shown in Figure 3a).After hydrothermal and annealing treatment, the MoS2 NS are uniformly loaded onto the surface of CNFs (shown in Figure 3b).After carbon modification, MoS2@CNFs@C can maintain the morphology structure similar to MoS2@CNFs (shown in Figure 3c).In addition, Figure 3d shows the typical nanosheet stacking structure of a pure MoS2 NS, which presents a nanosphere morphology.Such an assembly structure can be expected to exhibit enhanced potassium storage performances.As shown in Figure 4, this work studied the potassium storage performances of a pure MoS2 NS electrode.It can be seen that both the rate and cycling stability performances are poor.As shown in Figure 4a, with increasing the discharge current density, the specific capacity of the electrode gradually decreases.When the current density increases to 5 A g −1 , the specific capacity is close to 0. It can basically return to the previous state as the current density returns to 0.2 A g −1 .In addition, as shown in Figure 4b, during the first 100 cycles, the specific capacity decreases rapidly.The reason for the poor rate and cycle stability performances of a pure MoS2 NS electrode can be attributed to the poor electronic conductivity and the inevitable agglomeration phenomenon [26].As shown in Figure 4, this work studied the potassium storage performances of a pure MoS 2 NS electrode.It can be seen that both the rate and cycling stability performances are poor.As shown in Figure 4a, with increasing the discharge current density, the specific capacity of the electrode gradually decreases.When the current density increases to 5 A g −1 , the specific capacity is close to 0. It can basically return to the previous state as the current density returns to 0.2 A g −1 .In addition, as shown in Figure 4b, during the first 100 cycles, the specific capacity decreases rapidly.The reason for the poor rate and cycle stability performances of a pure MoS 2 NS electrode can be attributed to the poor electronic conductivity and the inevitable agglomeration phenomenon [26].
Coatings 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 7 Figure 3 shows the SEM images of samples.For CNFs, it can be seen that a network structure is formed by lots of nanofibers (shown in Figure 3a).After hydrothermal and annealing treatment, the MoS2 NS are uniformly loaded onto the surface of CNFs (shown in Figure 3b).After carbon modification, MoS2@CNFs@C can maintain the morphology structure similar to MoS2@CNFs (shown in Figure 3c).In addition, Figure 3d shows the typical nanosheet stacking structure of a pure MoS2 NS, which presents a nanosphere morphology.Such an assembly structure can be expected to exhibit enhanced potassium storage performances.As shown in Figure 4, this work studied the potassium storage performances of a pure MoS2 NS electrode.It can be seen that both the rate and cycling stability performances are poor.As shown in Figure 4a, with increasing the discharge current density, the specific capacity of the electrode gradually decreases.When the current density increases to 5 A g −1 , the specific capacity is close to 0. It can basically return to the previous state as the current density returns to 0.2 A g −1 .In addition, as shown in Figure 4b, during the first 100 cycles, the specific capacity decreases rapidly.The reason for the poor rate and cycle stability performances of a pure MoS2 NS electrode can be attributed to the poor electronic conductivity and the inevitable agglomeration phenomenon [26].Aiming at this problem, this work proposes structural and carbon modification strategies.Figure 5a shows the rate performance of the MoS 2 @CNFs and MoS 2 @CNFs@C electrodes in the range of 0.5-10 A g −1 .As we can see, the MoS 2 @CNFs@C electrode displays a better rate performance compared with the MoS 2 @CNFs electrode.Owing the existence of the carbon layer, when the discharge current density increases to more than 5 A g −1 , the rate advantage of the MoS 2 @CNFs@C electrode begins to appear.Its specific capacity is obviously higher than that of the MoS 2 @CNFs electrode under the same current density.Specifically, the MoS 2 @CNFs@C electrode shows a specific capacity of about 208, 185, 156, 131, and 93 mA h g −1 at 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10 A g −1 , respectively.In addition, the advantages of free-standing and the carbon layer structure result in an increasingly excellent cycling stability performance.As shown in Figure 5c, when increasing the number of cycles, their specific capacities show a downward trend.It is obvious that the MoS 2 @CNFs electrode without carbon modification decreases quickly.After 1000 cycles, the capacity retention of the MoS 2 @CNFs and the MoS 2 @CNFs@C electrode is ~54% and ~79%, respectively.The MoS 2 @CNFs@C electrode shows significantly better cycling stability with the slowly decreasing GCD curves (shown in Figure 5d).Even after 1800 cycles, it still has a high-capacity retention of about 75%.
Coatings 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 7 Aiming at this problem, this work proposes structural and carbon modification strategies.Figure 5a shows the rate performance of the MoS2@CNFs and MoS2@CNFs@C electrodes in the range of 0.5-10 A g −1 .As we can see, the MoS2@CNFs@C electrode displays a better rate performance compared with the MoS2@CNFs electrode.Owing to the existence of the carbon layer, when the discharge current density increases to more than 5 A g −1 , the rate advantage of the MoS2@CNFs@C electrode begins to appear.Its specific capacity is obviously higher than that of the MoS2@CNFs electrode under the same current density.Specifically, the MoS2@CNFs@C electrode shows a specific capacity of about 208, 185, 156, 131, and 93 mA h g −1 at 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10 A g −1 , respectively.In addition, the advantages of free-standing and the carbon layer structure result in an increasingly excellent cycling stability performance.As shown in Figure 5c, when increasing the number of cycles, their specific capacities show a downward trend.It is obvious that the MoS2@CNFs electrode without carbon modification decreases quickly.After 1000 cycles, the capacity retention of the MoS2@CNFs and the MoS2@CNFs@C electrode is ~54% and ~79%, respectively.The MoS2@CNFs@C electrode shows significantly better cycling stability with the slowly decreasing GCD curves (shown in Figure 5d).Even after 1800 cycles, it still has a high-capacity retention of about 75%.(a) Rate performance of MoS2@CNFs and MoS2@CNFs@C at different current densities, (b) with the corresponding GCD curves of MoS2@CNFs@C.(c) Cycling stability performance of MoS2@CNFs and MoS2@CNFs@C at 1 A g −1 , (d) with the corresponding GCD curves of MoS2@CNFs and MoS2@CNFs@C at the 500th and 1000th cycle.
The enhanced potassium storage performances can be attributed to the unique selfstanding carbon-coated MoS2@CNFs film architectures.Such a structure can effectively prevent the agglomeration behavior of the MoS2 NS loaded on the CNFs, relax the volume expansion, and increase the contact area between active material and an electrolyte.The coated carbon layers can improve the electronic conductivity of the whole electrode.It can also inhibit structural damage of electrode materials during the charging-discharging process in PIBs.As a result, the self-standing MoS2@CNFs@C film electrode exhibits the excellent potassium storage performances.@CNFs and MoS 2 @CNFs@C at different current densities, (b) with the corresponding GCD curves of MoS 2 @CNFs@C.(c) Cycling stability performance of MoS 2 @CNFs and MoS 2 @CNFs@C at 1 A g −1 , (d) with the corresponding GCD curves of MoS 2 @CNFs and MoS 2 @CNFs@C at the 500th and 1000th cycle.
The enhanced potassium storage performances can be attributed to the unique selfstanding carbon-coated MoS 2 @CNFs film architectures.Such a structure can effectively prevent the agglomeration behavior of the MoS 2 NS loaded on the CNFs, relax the volume expansion, and increase the contact area between active material and an electrolyte.The coated carbon layers can improve the electronic conductivity of the whole electrode.It can also inhibit structural damage of electrode materials during the charging-discharging process in PIBs.As a result, the self-standing MoS 2 @CNFs@C film electrode exhibits the excellent potassium storage performances.

Conclusions
In summary, based on the potassium storage structure advantages of MoS 2 , we ingeniously designed and synthesized a novel self-standing electrode system of MoS 2 @CNFs@C, without any additives or metal collectors.The carbon nanofibers derived from electrospinning were used as the self-standing skeleton for the uniform loading place of MoS 2 NS.The soft carbon layer derived from glucose can effectively improve the electronic conductivity of the whole electrode, and acts as protective layer for electrodes.Such a structure exhibits an excellent rate performance (about 208, 185, 156, 131, and 93 mA h g −1 at the current density of 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10 A g −1 , respectively,) and cycle stability performance (a high-capacity retention of ~75% after 1800 cycles at the current density of 1 A g −1 ) as for the application in PIBs.It is believed that other types of energy-storage electrodes can benefit from the similar structure and modification strategies.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Schematic illustration of the fabrication of MoS2@CNFs@C film electrode.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. The XRD patterns of pure MoS2 NS, MoS2@CNFs, and MoS2@CNFs@C.The inset is the simulated crystal structures of MoS2.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Schematic illustration of the fabrication of MoS 2 @CNFs@C film electrode.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Schematic illustration of the fabrication of MoS2@CNFs@C film electrode.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. The XRD patterns of pure MoS 2 NS, MoS 2 @CNFs, and MoS 2 @CNFs@C.The inset is the simulated crystal structures of MoS 2 .

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. (a) The rate performance data of pure MoS2 NS in range of 0.1-5 A g −1 .(b) The cycling stability data of pure MoS2 NS at 0.5 A g −1 .

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. (a) The rate performance data of pure MoS2 NS in range of 0.1-5 A g −1 .(b) The cycling stability data of pure MoS2 NS at 0.5 A g −1 .Figure 4. (a) The rate performance data of pure MoS 2 NS in range of 0.1-5 A g −1 .(b) The cycling stability data of pure MoS 2 NS at 0.5 A g −1 .

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. (a) The rate performance data of pure MoS2 NS in range of 0.1-5 A g −1 .(b) The cycling stability data of pure MoS2 NS at 0.5 A g −1 .Figure 4. (a) The rate performance data of pure MoS 2 NS in range of 0.1-5 A g −1 .(b) The cycling stability data of pure MoS 2 NS at 0.5 A g −1 .

Figure 5 .
Figure5.(a) Rate performance of MoS2@CNFs and MoS2@CNFs@C at different current densities, (b) with the corresponding GCD curves of MoS2@CNFs@C.(c) Cycling stability performance of MoS2@CNFs and MoS2@CNFs@C at 1 A g −1 , (d) with the corresponding GCD curves of MoS2@CNFs and MoS2@CNFs@C at the 500th and 1000th cycle.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. (a) Rate performance of MoS2 @CNFs and MoS 2 @CNFs@C at different current densities, (b) with the corresponding GCD curves of MoS 2 @CNFs@C.(c) Cycling stability performance of MoS 2 @CNFs and MoS 2 @CNFs@C at 1 A g −1 , (d) with the corresponding GCD curves of MoS 2 @CNFs and MoS 2 @CNFs@C at the 500th and 1000th cycle. 2