Preparation and Application of Polyurethane Coating Material Based on Epoxycyclohexane-Epoxychloropropane Protective for Paper

: Paper historic relics are of great value to research and preserve. However, with the change of environment, paper cultural relics are constantly aging and damaged. Therefore, the reinforcement and conservation of the paper is an important topic in the ﬁeld of cultural relics protection; thus, it is a crucial and arduous task to discover high-performance protective materials. The coating reinforcement method is a kind of commonsense method to strengthen the paper. Additionally, it is key to select appropriate reinforcing resins. Polyurethane has inﬂuence on the improvement of paper strength, stability, and appearance. The epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol was prepared with epoxycyclohexane and epoxychloropropane as materials, glycerol as the initiator, boron triﬂuoride diethyl etherate as the catalyst, and dichloromethane as the solvent. Infrared (IR) spectroscopy as well as proton nuclear magnetic resonance ( 1 HNMR) spectroscopy were adopted to characterize the structure of the synthetic copolyether. Then, polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane was prepared by the synthetic copolyether reacting with hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) trimer. The effect of the mass concentration of polyurethane on the tensile strength, elongation, folding endurance, and the tearing strength of paper samples were tested. When 10% polyurethane solution was applied to paper, not only were the mechanical properties greatly improved, but the gloss and brightness also changed slightly, which conformed to the principle of “repair as old”. The above results indicate that the synthetic polyurethane combines the advantages of epoxycyclohexane-poxychloropropane polyether polyol along with polyurethane, presenting excellent properties in paper reinforcement or conservation.


Preparation of Epoxycyclohexane-Epoxychloropropane Polyether Polyol
In the presence of the catalyst boron trifluoride diethyl etherate, the copolyether was obtained by ring-opening polymerization through the epoxy structure, with epoxycyclohexane and epoxychloropropane as the starting materials, glycerol as the initiator, and dichloromethane as the solvent [6,23]. A total of 0.69g glycerol (the molar ratio between glycerol and the starting materials is 0.03:1), 1.22g boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (the molar ratio between the catalyst and the starting materials is 0.035:1), and 20 mL dichloromethane were added into a 250 mL three-neck flask, then epoxycyclohexane and epoxychloropropane (as the starting materials in the molar ratio of 3:4) were added slowly in drops. Boron trifluoride diethyl etherate reacted with glycerol in dichloromethane solvent to form a reactive group. With the catalysis of the reactive group, the ring-opening polymerization of epoxycyclohexane and epoxychloropropane proceeded at 5 • C for 3-6 h, then the copolyether was obtained [20,23]. After the reaction, the pH of the product was adjusted to be weakly alkaline, and the ultimate copolyether was obtained by distilled water washing and vacuum distillation [6], which was then transparent and colorless.

Preparation of Polyurethane Based on Epoxycyclohexane-Epoxychloropropane Polyether Polyol
The obtained 5 g of epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol was mixed with 40 g of HDI trimer, followed by 30 g of ethyl acetate added later; dibutyltin dilaurate was used as the catalyst. The reaction proceeded at 70 • C. The content of the isocyanate group (-NCO) was measured at hourly interval, and the reaction was terminated until the content of -NCO was 15%.

Paper Coating
Firstly, Xuan paper, being analogous to the paper applied in historic relics [24], was cropped into the standard size of 210 mm × 297 mm. Secondly, both sides of the paper in the experimental and control group were dipped in different concentrations of polyurethane liquids(ethyl acetate as the solvent) and ethyl acetate separately for 2-5 min, then dried at room temperature. The coating procedures are shown in Figure 1.

Preparation of Epoxycyclohexane-Epoxychloropropane Polyether Polyol
In the presence of the catalyst boron trifluoride diethyl etherate, the copolyether was obtained by ring-opening polymerization through the epoxy structure, with epoxycyclohexane and epoxychloropropane as the starting materials, glycerol as the initiator, and dichloromethane as the solvent [6,23]. A total of 0.69g glycerol (the molar ratio between glycerol and the starting materials is 0.03:1), 1.22g boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (the molar ratio between the catalyst and the starting materials is 0.035:1), and 20 mL dichloromethane were added into a 250 mL three-neck flask, then epoxycyclohexane and epoxychloropropane (as the starting materials in the molar ratio of 3:4) were added slowly in drops. Boron trifluoride diethyl etherate reacted with glycerol in dichloromethane solvent to form a reactive group. With the catalysis of the reactive group, the ring-opening polymerization of epoxycyclohexane and epoxychloropropane proceeded at 5 °C for 3 -6 h, then the copolyether was obtained [20,23]. After the reaction, the pH of the product was adjusted to be weakly alkaline, and the ultimate copolyether was obtained by distilled water washing and vacuum distillation [6], which was then transparent and colorless.

Preparation of Polyurethane Based on Epoxycyclohexane-Epoxychloropropane Polyether Polyol
The obtained 5 g of epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol was mixed with 40 g of HDI trimer, followed by 30 g of ethyl acetate added later; dibutyltin dilaurate was used as the catalyst. The reaction proceeded at 70 °C. The content of the isocyanate group (-NCO) was measured at hourly interval, and the reaction was terminated until the content of -NCO was 15%.

Paper Coating
Firstly, Xuan paper, being analogous to the paper applied in historic relics [24], was cropped into the standard size of 210 mm × 297 mm. Secondly, both sides of the paper in the experimental and control group were dipped in different concentrations of polyurethane liquids(ethyl acetate as the solvent) and ethyl acetate separately for 2-5 min, then dried at room temperature. The coating procedures are shown in Figure 1.

Analysis and Testing Methods
By reference to Chinese standard GB/T12914-2008 (ISO 12914-2:1994, MOD) [25], the determination of the tensile strength of the paper was proceeded by a PN-TT300 (Hangzhou Pin Heng Technology Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, China) at 20 mm/min, and the

Analysis and Testing Methods
By reference to Chinese standard GB/T12914-2008 (ISO 12914-2:1994, MOD) [25], the determination of the tensile strength of the paper was proceeded by a PN-TT300 (Hangzhou Pin Heng Technology Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, China) at 20 mm/min, and the paper was cropped to a 24.0 cm × 1.5 cm size. By reference to the Chinese standard GB/T457-2008 (ISO5626:1993, MOD) [26], determination of the folding endurance of the paper was proceeded by a double-fold instrument PN-NZ135 (Hangzhou Pin Heng Technology Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, China) at a force of 4.9N, and the paper samples were cropped to a 15.0 cm × 1.5 cm size. By reference to the Chinese standard GB/ T455-2002T455- (equiv. ISO 1974T455- :1990 [27], determination of the tearing strength of the paper was proceeded by the PN-TT1000 (Hangzhou Pin Heng Technology Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, China); the paper was also cropped to a 6.5 cm × 5.0 cm size. By reference to the Chinese standard GB/T 8941-2013 (ISO 8254-1-2009, MOD) [28], determination of the gloss of the paper was proceeded by a glossmeter of PN-GM (Hangzhou Pin Heng Technology Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, China) in modes of G20, G60, and G75. By reference to the Chinese standard GB/T 7974-2013 (ISO 2470:1999, MOD) [29], determination of the brightness of the paper was proceeded by a PN-48B brightness tester (Hangzhou Pin Heng Technology Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, China). Modes of blue and green light diffuse reflectance spectra (R457 and Ry) were chosen [6,23]. IR was tested by Fourier transform infrared spectrometer TENSOR 27 (Bruker Optics, Karlsruhe, Germany) with a resolution of 4 cm −1 and a spectral range of 350~4000 cm −1 . 1 HNMR was tested by a 400 MHz WB solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Karlsruhe, Germany). Gel permeation chromatography was tested by gel permeation chromatography IR300 (Thermo Nicolet Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) with a flow velocity of 1.0 mL/min and a column temperature of 30 • C. The scanning electron microscope was tested by scanning electron microscope NovaNano SEM450 (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

The Reaction Mechanism of Epoxycyclohexane-Epoxychloropropane Polyether Polyol
In the presence of the catalyst boron trifluoride diethyl etherate, the copolyether was obtained by cationic ring-opening polymerization through the epoxy structure, with epoxycyclohexane and epoxychloropropane as the starting materials, glycerol as the initiator, and dichloromethane as the solvent [6,23,30]. Glycerol reacts with boron trifluoride diethyl etherate, then the resulting intermediate product and epoxycyclohexane react to form an oxonium ion with a positive charge in the active center. This undergoes a nucleophilic reaction with the active oxygen-containing groups of epoxycyclohexane and epoxychloropropane. The process of ring-opening polymerization is divided into chain initiation stage, chain growth stage and chain termination stage [21]. The reaction mechanism can be seen in Scheme 1.
paper was cropped to a 24.0 cm × 1.5 cm size. By reference to the Chinese standard GB/T457-2008 (ISO5626:1993,MOD) [26], determination of the folding endurance of the paper was proceeded by a double-fold instrument PN-NZ135 (Hangzhou Pin Heng Technology Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, China) at a force of 4.9N, and the paper samples were cropped to a 15.0 cm × 1.5 cm size. By reference to the Chinese standard GB/ T455-2002T455- (equiv. ISO 1974T455- :1990 [27], determination of the tearing strength of the paper was proceeded by the PN-TT1000 (Hangzhou Pin Heng Technology Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, China); the paper was also cropped to a 6.5 cm × 5.0 cm size. By reference to the Chinese standard GB/T 8941-2013 (ISO 8254-1-2009, MOD) [28], determination of the gloss of the paper was proceeded by a glossmeter of PN-GM (Hangzhou Pin Heng Technology Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, China) in modes of G20, G60, and G75. By reference to the Chinese standard GB/T 7974-2013 (ISO 2470:1999, MOD) [29], determination of the brightness of the paper was proceeded by a PN-48B brightness tester (Hangzhou Pin Heng Technology Co. Ltd., Hangzhou,China). Modes of blue and green light diffuse reflectance spectra (R457 and Ry) were chosen [6,23]. IR was tested by Fourier transform infrared spectrometer TENSOR 27 (Bruker Optics, Karlsruhe, Germany) with a resolution of 4 cm −1 and a spectral range of 350~4000 cm −1 HNMR was tested by a 400 MHz WB solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Karlsruhe, Germany). Gel permeation chromatography was tested by gel permeation chromatography IR300 (Thermo Nicolet Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) with a flow velocity of 1.0 mL/min and a column temperature of 30 °C. The scanning electron microscope was tested by scanning electron microscope NovaNano SEM450 (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

The Reaction Mechanism of Epoxycyclohexane-Epoxychloropropane Polyether Polyol
In the presence of the catalyst boron trifluoride diethyl etherate, the copolyether was obtained by cationic ring-opening polymerization through the epoxy structure, with epoxycyclohexane and epoxychloropropane as the starting materials, glycerol as the initiator, and dichloromethane as the solvent [6,23,30]. Glycerol reacts with boron trifluoride diethyl etherate, then the resulting intermediate product and epoxycyclohexane react to form an oxonium ion with a positive charge in the active center. This undergoes a nucleophilic reaction with the active oxygen-containing groups of epoxycyclohexane and epoxychloropropane. The process of ring-opening polymerization is divided into chain initiation stage, chain growth stage and chain termination stage [21]. The reaction mechanism can be seen in Scheme 1.

The first step:
The second step: The third step: The total reaction is as follows: The synthesis process of epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol can be seen in Figure 2. The IR spectrum of the copolyether is shown in Figure 3. According to the IR spectrum, the characteristic absorption peak of hydroxyl group is at 3347 cm −1 . The strong absorption peaks at 2930 cm −1 and 2857 cm −1 are methylene and methine groups, respectively. The absorption peak of the aliphatic ether bond is at 1083 cm −1 , and the peak was chosen as an iconic functional group of copolyether. The absorption peak of carbon-chlorine bond is at 780 cm −1 .  The synthesis process of epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol can be seen in Figure 2. The third step: The total reaction is as follows: The synthesis process of epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol can be seen in Figure 2. The IR spectrum of the copolyether is shown in Figure 3. According to the IR spectrum, the characteristic absorption peak of hydroxyl group is at 3347 cm −1 . The strong absorption peaks at 2930 cm −1 and 2857 cm −1 are methylene and methine groups, respectively. The absorption peak of the aliphatic ether bond is at 1083 cm −1 , and the peak was chosen as an iconic functional group of copolyether. The absorption peak of carbon-chlorine bond is at 780 cm −1 .   The IR spectrum of the copolyether is shown in Figure 3. According to the IR spectrum, the characteristic absorption peak of hydroxyl group is at 3347 cm −1 . The strong absorption peaks at 2930 cm −1 and 2857 cm −1 are methylene and methine groups, respectively. The absorption peak of the aliphatic ether bond is at 1083 cm −1 , and the peak was chosen as an iconic functional group of copolyether. The absorption peak of carbon-chlorine bond is at 780 cm −1 .
Coatings 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 14 The third step: The total reaction is as follows: The synthesis process of epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol can be seen in Figure 2. The IR spectrum of the copolyether is shown in Figure 3. According to the IR spectrum, the characteristic absorption peak of hydroxyl group is at 3347 cm −1 . The strong absorption peaks at 2930 cm −1 and 2857 cm −1 are methylene and methine groups, respectively. The absorption peak of the aliphatic ether bond is at 1083 cm −1 , and the peak was chosen as an iconic functional group of copolyether. The absorption peak of carbon-chlorine bond is at 780 cm −1 .

Characteristic Functional Groups
Chemical Shift δ, ppm The representative H of a, b, c, d, e and f are showed in Figure 4, and the 1 HNMR spectroscopy of the copolyether is shown in Figure 5.
Coatings 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 14 1 HNMR analysis of the copolyether is shown in Table 1.

Characteristic Functional Groups
The representative H of a, b, c, d, e and f are showed in Figure 4, and the 1 HNMR spectroscopy of the copolyether is shown in Figure 5. As illustrated in Figure 5, the proton peaks of methylene in the residual monomers of epoxycyclohexane are between δ 1.0 and 2.0. In addition, methine in the residual monomers of epoxycyclohexane, and all H atoms in the residual monomers of epoxychloropropane are between δ 3.0 and 4.0. Combined with the IR spectrum, it is suggested that the copolyether was obtained by ring-opening polymerization through the epoxy structure, with epoxycyclohexane and epoxychloropropane as the starting materials.

Characteristic Functional Groups
Chemical Shift δ, ppm The representative H of a, b, c, d, e and f are showed in Figure 4, and the 1 HNMR spectroscopy of the copolyether is shown in Figure 5. As illustrated in Figure 5, the proton peaks of methylene in the residual monomers of epoxycyclohexane are between δ 1.0 and 2.0. In addition, methine in the residual monomers of epoxycyclohexane, and all H atoms in the residual monomers of epoxychloropropane are between δ 3.0 and 4.0. Combined with the IR spectrum, it is suggested that the copolyether was obtained by ring-opening polymerization through the epoxy structure, with epoxycyclohexane and epoxychloropropane as the starting materials.  As illustrated in Figure 5, the proton peaks of methylene in the residual monomers of epoxycyclohexane are between δ 1.0 and 2.0. In addition, methine in the residual monomers of epoxycyclohexane, and all H atoms in the residual monomers of epoxychloropropane are between δ 3.0 and 4.0. Combined with the IR spectrum, it is suggested that the copolyether was obtained by ring-opening polymerization through the epoxy structure, with epoxycyclohexane and epoxychloropropane as the starting materials.
The obtained copolyether was dissolved with N,N-Dimethylformamide, treated and analyzed by gel permeation chromatography; the results were as follows: Mw = 2547.29, Mn = 2473, D = Mw/Mn = 1.03. Mw: the average molecular weight; Mn: number-average molar weight; D: molecular weight dispersion. The gel permeation chromatogram of the synthetic copolyether is shown in Figure 6. The obtained copolyether was dissolved with N,N-Dimethylformamide, treated and analyzed by gel permeation chromatography; the results were as follows: Mw =2547.29, Mn =2473, D= Mw / Mn =1.03. Mw : the average molecular weight; Mn : numberaverage molar weight; D: molecular weight dispersion. The gel permeation chromatogram of the synthetic copolyether is shown in Figure 6.

Properties of Polyurethane Based on Epoxycyclohexane-Epoxychloropropane Polyether Polyol
The polyurethane material was synthesized using epoxycyclohexaneepoxychloropropane polyether polyol and HDI trimer. The reaction mechanism is shown in Scheme 2. With dibutyltin dilaurate as the catalyst, the isocyanate groups of the HDI trimer are highly reactive with hydroxyl groups of epoxycyclohexaneepoxychloropropane polyether polyol. Scheme 2. The reaction mechanism of polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol. 1 HNMR analysis of the synthetic polyurethane is shown in Table 2.

Properties of Polyurethane Based on Epoxycyclohexane-Epoxychloropropane Polyether Polyol
The polyurethane material was synthesized using epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol and HDI trimer. The reaction mechanism is shown in Scheme 2. With dibutyltin dilaurate as the catalyst, the isocyanate groups of the HDI trimer are highly reactive with hydroxyl groups of epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol. The obtained copolyether was dissolved with N,N-Dimethylformamide, treated and analyzed by gel permeation chromatography; the results were as follows: Mw =2547.29, Mn =2473, D= Mw / Mn =1.03. Mw : the average molecular weight; Mn : numberaverage molar weight; D: molecular weight dispersion. The gel permeation chromatogram of the synthetic copolyether is shown in Figure 6.

Properties of Polyurethane Based on Epoxycyclohexane-Epoxychloropropane Polyether Polyol
The polyurethane material was synthesized using epoxycyclohexaneepoxychloropropane polyether polyol and HDI trimer. The reaction mechanism is shown in Scheme 2. With dibutyltin dilaurate as the catalyst, the isocyanate groups of the HDI trimer are highly reactive with hydroxyl groups of epoxycyclohexaneepoxychloropropane polyether polyol. Scheme 2. The reaction mechanism of polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol. 1 HNMR analysis of the synthetic polyurethane is shown in Table 2. The reaction mechanism of polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol. 1 HNMR analysis of the synthetic polyurethane is shown in Table 2. The representative H of a, b, c, d, e, f and g are showed in Figure 7, and the 1 HNMR spectroscopy of the epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane-based polyurethane is shown in Figure 8. The representative H of a, b, c, d, e, f and g are showed in Figure 7, and the 1 HNMR spectroscopy of the epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane-based polyurethane is shown in Figure 8. As illustrated in Figure 8, the proton peaks of methylene in the residual monomers of epoxycyclohexane are between δ 1.0 and 2.0. In addition, methine in the residual monomers of epoxycyclohexane, and all H atoms in the residual monomers of epoxychloropropane are between δ 3.0 and 4.0. The chemical shift of the amide proton changes less. It is known that the synthetic product contains carbamate groups, proving that the product is polyurethane.    As illustrated in Figure 8, the proton peaks of methylene in the residual monomers of epoxycyclohexane are between δ 1.0 and 2.0. In addition, methine in the residual monomers of epoxycyclohexane, and all H atoms in the residual monomers of epoxychloropropane are between δ 3.0 and 4.0. The chemical shift of the amide proton changes less. It is known that the synthetic product contains carbamate groups, proving that the product is polyurethane.   As illustrated in Figure 8, the proton peaks of methylene in the residual monomers of epoxycyclohexane are between δ 1.0 and 2.0. In addition, methine in the residual monomers of epoxycyclohexane, and all H atoms in the residual monomers of epoxychloropropane are between δ 3.0 and 4.0. The chemical shift of the amide proton changes less. It is known that the synthetic product contains carbamate groups, proving that the product is polyurethane.

Application of Polyurethane Based on Epoxycyclohexane-Epoxychloropropane Polyether Polyol in Paper
The effect of polyurethane mass concentration on tensile strength, elongation, folding endurance, and tearing strength of paper were tested [6,18,19]. As illustrated in Figure 9a, the tensile strength of the paper increased with an increase in the mass concentration of epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane-based polyurethane. When the mass concentration of the polyurethane was 25%, the tensile strength increased from 1105 N/m to 3739.4 N/m, with an increase of 238%. This indicates that polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexaneepoxychloropropane polyether polyol and the paper may form a network, which can strengthen the fibers of the paper; the tensile strength of the coated paper was also effectively improved. Paper elongation is another important indicator of the tensile strength of paper. As shown in Figure 9b, the elongation of the paper in the control group was 0.9%. When the mass concentration of the polyurethane was less than 15%, the elongation increased with an increase in mass concentration. Furthermore, the elongation reached 3.49% at a mass concentration of 15%, which was 287% higher than that in the control group. When the mass concentration of the polyurethane was more than 15%, the elongation decreased as the mass concentration rose. In paper fibers, as carbamate bonds replace the hydrogen bonds, the bonding force is enhanced. On the other hand, when there is sustained growth in mass concentration, the paper may become brittle. Consequently, as mass concentration increases, the elongation displays an increase, then a decrease. As Figure 9c illustrates, the folding endurance of the paper showed a trend of rising and then declining as the mass concentration of polyurethane grew; the trend was the same as elongation. When the mass concentration was 10%, the growth in folding endurance was 8905%, from 20 times to 1801 times. Epoxy cyclohexane has a rigid six-membered ring, so the synthetic epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane-based polyurethane reinforcing solution improves the resistant external forces of paper while coating on the paper. Furthermore, there are more capabilities in the coated paper fibers to hold the original flexibility in the folding process, resulting in a significant increase in both tensile strength and folding endurance. However, when the mass concentration continued to increase, it caused the paper to thicken, leading to significant fracture and embrittlement of the polyurethane coating, and the flexibility of the paper reduced correspondingly. As shown in Figure 9d, with the increase of the mass concentration, the tearing strength tended to first increase and then decrease. When the mass concentration of the polyurethane was 15%, the tearing strength was 188.2 mN, which was 53% higher than that in the control group. It shows the broken fibers were in interaction due to the synthetic polyurethane [21]. With sustained growth in mass concentration, owing to the increasing steric hindrance of the polyurethane molecules, the bonding force among fibers decreased, causing the peeling of the paper.

Application of Polyurethane Based on Epoxycyclohexane-Epoxychloropropane Polyether Polyol in Paper
The effect of polyurethane mass concentration on tensile strength, elongation, folding endurance, and tearing strength of paper were tested [6,18,19]. As illustrated in Figure 9a, the tensile strength of the paper increased with an increase in the mass concentration of epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane-based polyurethane. When the mass concentration of the polyurethane was 25%, the tensile strength increased from 1105 N/m to 3739.4 N/m, with an increase of 238%. This indicates that polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol and the paper may form a network, which can strengthen the fibers of the paper; the tensile strength of the coated paper was also effectively improved. Paper elongation is another important indicator of the tensile strength of paper. As shown in Figure 9b, the elongation of the paper in the control group was 0.9%. When the mass concentration of the polyurethane was less than 15%, the elongation increased with an increase in mass concentration. Furthermore, the elongation reached 3.49% at a mass concentration of 15%, which was 287% higher than that in the control group. When the mass concentration of the polyurethane was more than 15%, the elongation decreased as the mass concentration rose. In paper fibers, as carbamate bonds replace the hydrogen bonds, the bonding force is enhanced. On the other hand, when there is sustained growth in mass concentration, the paper may become brittle. Consequently, as mass concentration increases, the elongation displays an increase, then a decrease. As Figure 9c illustrates, the folding endurance of the paper showed a trend of rising and then declining as the mass concentration of polyurethane grew; the trend was the same as elongation. When the mass concentration was 10%, the growth in folding endurance was 8905%, from 20 times to 1801 times. Epoxy cyclohexane has a rigid six-membered ring, so the synthetic epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropanebased polyurethane reinforcing solution improves the resistant external forces of paper while coating on the paper. Furthermore, there are more capabilities in the coated paper fibers to hold the original flexibility in the folding process, resulting in a significant increase in both tensile strength and folding endurance. However, when the mass concentration continued to increase, it caused the paper to thicken, leading to significant fracture and embrittlement of the polyurethane coating, and the flexibility of the paper reduced correspondingly. As shown in Figure 9d, with the increase of the mass concentration, the tearing strength tended to first increase and then decrease. When the mass concentration of the polyurethane was 15%, the tearing strength was 188.2 mN, which was 53% higher than that in the control group. It shows the broken fibers were in interaction due to the synthetic polyurethane [21]. With sustained growth in mass concentration, owing to the increasing steric hindrance of the polyurethane molecules, the bonding force among fibers decreased, causing the peeling of the paper. The effect of mass concentration of the synthetic polyurethane on gloss of the paper is shown in Figure 10. As illustrated in Figure 10, when the mass concentration was less than 15%, the gloss of the paper gradually decreased with the increasing concentration, but the change is not significant. When the mass concentration was 15%, the gloss of G20 decreased by 8% from 2.5 to 2.3, the gloss of G60 decreased by 7% from 4.1 to 3.8, and the gloss of G70 decreased by 2% from 4.9 to 4.8. When the mass concentration was greater than 15%, and increased in concentration, the gloss of the paper began to decline significantly.
The effect of the mass concentration of the synthetic polyurethane on the brightness of the paper is shown in Figure 11. The effect of mass concentration of the synthetic polyurethane on gloss of the paper is shown in Figure 10. The effect of mass concentration of the synthetic polyurethane on gloss of the paper is shown in Figure 10. As illustrated in Figure 10, when the mass concentration was less than 15%, the gloss of the paper gradually decreased with the increasing concentration, but the change is not significant. When the mass concentration was 15%, the gloss of G20 decreased by 8% from 2.5 to 2.3, the gloss of G60 decreased by 7% from 4.1 to 3.8, and the gloss of G70 decreased by 2% from 4.9 to 4.8. When the mass concentration was greater than 15%, and increased in concentration, the gloss of the paper began to decline significantly.
The effect of the mass concentration of the synthetic polyurethane on the brightness of the paper is shown in Figure 11. As illustrated in Figure 10, when the mass concentration was less than 15%, the gloss of the paper gradually decreased with the increasing concentration, but the change is not significant. When the mass concentration was 15%, the gloss of G20 decreased by 8% from 2.5 to 2.3, the gloss of G60 decreased by 7% from 4.1 to 3.8, and the gloss of G70 decreased by 2% from 4.9 to 4.8. When the mass concentration was greater than 15%, and increased in concentration, the gloss of the paper began to decline significantly.
The effect of the mass concentration of the synthetic polyurethane on the brightness of the paper is shown in Figure 11. Coatings 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 14 Figure 11. Brightness of the paper treated with different mass concentrations of polyurethane (chosen modes of blue and green light diffuse reflectance spectra, R457 and Ry). ■, R457; •, Ry.
As shown in Figure 11, with the increase in mass concentration, the brightness of the paper gradually decreased. When the mass concentration was 15%, the R457 whiteness was 78%, with a decrease of 3.7%, and Ry brightness was 82%, with a decrease of 2.3%. Consequently, the synthetic polyurethane has little influence on the brightness of the paper.
Accordingly, after a comprehensive evaluation of the tensile strength, elongation, folding endurance, tearing strength, brightness, and gloss, the optimal mass concentration of polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol is 10%.
Analysis indicated that the synthetic polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexaneepoxychloropropane polyether polyol was dried to form the coating of the treated paper, filling the gaps in the paper fibers, enhancing the binding force between fibers, actually improving paper performance. By ring-opening polymerization of epoxycyclohexane, the synthetic polyurethane has the solidity of the six-membered ring, improving the paper anti-reciprocating folding ability at a certain tension, benefitting the resistant external forces of paper. In addition, there is more capability in the coated paper fibers to hold the original flexibility in the folding process. In general, the tensile strength, folding endurance, elongation as well as tearing strength have been improved. Coupled with its large steric hindrance, the obtained polyurethane molecular chain is disordered, transparent, not easy to crystallize, and possesses good gloss and brightness. Meanwhile, for the linear structure of epoxychloropropane, the hardness of the copolyether decreases and the fluidity increases [17][18][19].
An analysis and comparison of applications of previously synthetic polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexane homopolyetheryl and polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane copolyether in paper reinforcement were studied. This indicated that both the tensile strength of the coated paper improved effectively. As the mass concentration increased, the tensile strength of the paper treated with homopolyetheryl-based polyurethane liquid increased until the mass concentration reached 20%, then the tensile strength declined. With the polyurethane mass concentration growth to 20%, the tensile strength increased from 1105 to 3039 N/m. However, the tensile strength of the paper increased with the growth of the mass concentration of copolyether-based polyurethane. When the mass concentration of the polyurethane was 25%, the tensile strength increased from 1105 N/m to 3739.4 N/m. In As shown in Figure 11, with the increase in mass concentration, the brightness of the paper gradually decreased. When the mass concentration was 15%, the R457 whiteness was 78%, with a decrease of 3.7%, and Ry brightness was 82%, with a decrease of 2.3%. Consequently, the synthetic polyurethane has little influence on the brightness of the paper.
Accordingly, after a comprehensive evaluation of the tensile strength, elongation, folding endurance, tearing strength, brightness, and gloss, the optimal mass concentration of polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol is 10%.
Analysis indicated that the synthetic polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol was dried to form the coating of the treated paper, filling the gaps in the paper fibers, enhancing the binding force between fibers, actually improving paper performance. By ring-opening polymerization of epoxycyclohexane, the synthetic polyurethane has the solidity of the six-membered ring, improving the paper anti-reciprocating folding ability at a certain tension, benefitting the resistant external forces of paper. In addition, there is more capability in the coated paper fibers to hold the original flexibility in the folding process. In general, the tensile strength, folding endurance, elongation as well as tearing strength have been improved. Coupled with its large steric hindrance, the obtained polyurethane molecular chain is disordered, transparent, not easy to crystallize, and possesses good gloss and brightness. Meanwhile, for the linear structure of epoxychloropropane, the hardness of the copolyether decreases and the fluidity increases [17][18][19].
An analysis and comparison of applications of previously synthetic polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexane homopolyetheryl and polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexaneepoxychloropropane copolyether in paper reinforcement were studied. This indicated that both the tensile strength of the coated paper improved effectively. As the mass concentration increased, the tensile strength of the paper treated with homopolyetheryl-based polyurethane liquid increased until the mass concentration reached 20%, then the tensile strength declined. With the polyurethane mass concentration growth to 20%, the tensile strength increased from 1105 to 3039 N/m. However, the tensile strength of the paper increased with the growth of the mass concentration of copolyether-based polyurethane. When the mass concentration of the polyurethane was 25%, the tensile strength increased from 1105 N/m to 3739.4 N/m. In addition, the tensile strength of paper treated by copolyether-based polyurethane was higher than that treated by homopolyetheryl-based polyurethane at each mass concentration. In comparison to elongation, both display similar responses. In contrast to folding endurance, both display rising, and then decrease as the mass concentration rises. When the mass concentration of homopolyetheryl-based polyurethane increased to 10%, the folding endurance increased from 20 to 504 times, about 24.2 times higher than that of the blank paper. When the mass concentration of copolyether-based polyurethane was 10%, the folding endurance increased by 8905% from 20 to 1801 times. In particular, copolyether-based polyurethane gave better results. With the increase of the mass concentration, the tearing strength of both tended to increase first and then decrease. Copolyether-based polyurethane was higher than that treated by homopolyetheryl-based polyurethane at each mass concentration. In conclusion, copolyether-based polyurethane has a better influence on improvement of tensile strength, elongation, folding endurance, and tearing strength of paper [19].
The scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the paper samples can be seen in Figure 12.
addition, the tensile strength of paper treated by copolyether-based polyurethane was higher than that treated by homopolyetheryl-based polyurethane at each mass concentration. In comparison to elongation, both display similar responses. In contrast to folding endurance, both display rising, and then decrease as the mass concentration rises. When the mass concentration of homopolyetheryl-based polyurethane increased to 10%, the folding endurance increased from 20 to 504 times, about 24.2 times higher than that of the blank paper. When the mass concentration of copolyether-based polyurethane was 10%, the folding endurance increased by 8905% from 20 to 1801 times. In particular, copolyether-based polyurethane gave better results. With the increase of the mass concentration, the tearing strength of both tended to increase first and then decrease. Copolyether-based polyurethane was higher than that treated by homopolyetheryl-based polyurethane at each mass concentration. In conclusion, copolyether-based polyurethane has a better influence on improvement of tensile strength, elongation, folding endurance, and tearing strength of paper [19].
The scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the paper samples can be seen in Figure 12. From Figure 12, it can be seen that the fiber distribution of paper in the control group were messy and uneven in thickness, and there were more inter-fiber gaps. The paper fibers in the experimental group that were treated by polyurethane became coarser and evenly dispersed, and the broken fibers of the paper samples were also interacting. Moreover, the inter-fiber gaps were filled by the reinforcement solution, and the paper surface was smoother.
The appearance of the calligraphy work treated before and after with 10% polyurethane liquid are shown in Figure 13. Evidently, the polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol was highly transparent, and there was no ink diffusion or changes in the appearance. From Figure 12, it can be seen that the fiber distribution of paper in the control group were messy and uneven in thickness, and there were more inter-fiber gaps. The paper fibers in the experimental group that were treated by polyurethane became coarser and evenly dispersed, and the broken fibers of the paper samples were also interacting. Moreover, the inter-fiber gaps were filled by the reinforcement solution, and the paper surface was smoother.
The appearance of the calligraphy work treated before and after with 10% polyurethane liquid are shown in Figure 13. Evidently, the polyurethane based on epoxycyclohexaneepoxychloropropane polyether polyol was highly transparent, and there was no ink diffusion or changes in the appearance. Coatings 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 14 Figure 13. The appearance of the calligraphy work treated before(a) and after(b) with synthetic polyurethane.

Conclusions
Epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol was obtained by cationic ring-opening polymerization, which was characterized by IR spectra and 1 HNMR spectroscopy. Polyurethane was then prepared by the synthetic copolyether and HDI trimer. Furthermore, the results of the tests conducted on paper samples coated with 10% polyurethane liquid indicated that the coated paper presented excellent properties in tensile strength, elongation, folding endurance, and tearing strength. Additionally, the coated paper presented good gloss and brightness. The determination of the appearance of a calligraphy work coating with 10% polyurethane liquid showed that there was no ink diffusion and no changes in the appearance. Compared to homopolyetheryl-based polyurethane, copolyether-based polyurethane has a better influence on the improvement of mechanical properties of paper. In conclusion, the synthetic polyurethane combines the advantages of epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol and polyurethane, demonstrating excellent properties in paper reinforcement or conservation.

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Sample Availability: Samples of the compound epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol are available from the authors.

Conclusions
Epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol was obtained by cationic ringopening polymerization, which was characterized by IR spectra and 1 HNMR spectroscopy. Polyurethane was then prepared by the synthetic copolyether and HDI trimer. Furthermore, the results of the tests conducted on paper samples coated with 10% polyurethane liquid indicated that the coated paper presented excellent properties in tensile strength, elongation, folding endurance, and tearing strength. Additionally, the coated paper presented good gloss and brightness. The determination of the appearance of a calligraphy work coating with 10% polyurethane liquid showed that there was no ink diffusion and no changes in the appearance. Compared to homopolyetheryl-based polyurethane, copolyether-based polyurethane has a better influence on the improvement of mechanical properties of paper. In conclusion, the synthetic polyurethane combines the advantages of epoxycyclohexaneepoxychloropropane polyether polyol and polyurethane, demonstrating excellent properties in paper reinforcement or conservation.

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Sample Availability: Samples of the compound epoxycyclohexane-epoxychloropropane polyether polyol are available from the authors.