One-Step Reinforcement and Deacidification of Paper Documents: Application of Lewis Base—Chitosan Nanoparticle Coatings and Analytical Characterization

: To delay acidiﬁcation and deterioration during natural aging, deacidiﬁcation and reinforcement of paper manuscripts have been the most important technologies to prolong the life of objects. Herein, a novel approach for the conservation of paper manuscripts is proposed using chitosan nanoparticles as Lewis base that leads to both deacidiﬁcation and strengthening of paper in one-step. Chitosan nanoparticles were prepared through physical ball grinding method and characterized via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray di ﬀ raction (XRD), laser particle size analyzer (LPSA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and atomic force microscope (AFM). To evaluate the resistance of chitosan nanoparticle coating, the mechanical properties of paper after artiﬁcial aging were evaluated using dry heat and hygrothermal accelerated aging methods. The SEM, EDX, and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) were used to analyze the interaction mechanism between chitosan and Shuxuan paper. The results show that the coated paper had superior durability with respect to pH, tensile strength, and folding endurance. There was a presence of protonated amines in the form of ammonium salts due to ionic bindings with free H + in the acidiﬁed paper, and the remaining –NH 2 could be used as a base reserve. Finally, the resulting coated papers displayed good antibacterial properties.


Introduction
Besides several industrial applications, cellulose-based materials, such as paper and canvas, which are primarily composed of cellulose, provide the most common types of support for works of art. Cellulose in historical manuscripts is subjected to several decay processes that may lead to irreversible degradation and ultimate loss of valuable information [1,2]. Cellulose is a linear polymer consisting of several hundred to over ten thousand d-glucose units linked to each other by a β-(1,4)-glycosidic bond. The degree of polymerization (DP) of native cellulose can vary between 7000 and 15,000 depending on the plant species [3]. The hydrolysis of β-(1,4)-glycosidic bonds of cellulose linear chains is catalyzed by acidity and is the main cause of cellulose-based material degradation, reducing the mechanical properties of cellulose-based materials [4]. The hydrolysis reaction is affected by multiple factors such as pH, temperature, moisture content, and degree of crystallinity, and can be described using a three-step mechanism [5,6], resulting in a self-accelerating reaction [7,8].
The preservation and protection of existing acidic historical paper documents have long been an important issue for libraries, archives, and museums. To delay acidification and deterioration during

Materials
Chitosan (deacetylation 90% and MW 1 × 10 6 Da) was purchased from Zhejiang Golden-shell Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Yuhuan, China), while isopropanol was purchased from J&K Scientific Ltd. (Beijing, China) The Shuxuan paper (density 40 g/m 2 ) of Jingxian Purple Light Paper Industry, Anhui, China, was used as a model specimen. The pH of the deionized water in which the Shuxuan paper is dipped was measured according to GB/T1545-2008 [43] with METTLER-TOLEDO FE28 pH Meter (Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA), and the measured pH value was about 5.0.

Preparation Chitosan Nanoparticles
Chitosan powders were mechanically milled in a QM-3SP2 planetary ball mill (NanDa Instrument Plant, Nanjing, China) at 400 rpm for 120 h using zirconia balls. The chitosan powders were obtained by separating the zirconia balls.

Conservation Procedure and Characterization Methods
The treatments for different specimens are as follows. Different masses of chitosan nanoparticles milled (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 g) were dispersed in 100 mL isopropanol via ultrasonic treatment for 15 min. Then, 30 mL dispersive solution of chitosan with different concentrations was sprayed on a 35 × 35 cm 2 paper. The samples were placed into the BCM-1000 bio-cleaning worktable, and isopropanol was completely volatilized under low wind speed. Before testing, the samples were maintained at (23 ± 1) °C with the relative humidity of (50 ± 2) % for 24 h according to Chinese standard GB/T 10739-2002 [44] (eqv ISO 187:1990) [45] The pH value of the specimens is increased with the amount of chitosan nanoparticles increasing. The pH value is increased from 5.0 to 7.11 when using 1.0 g chitosan nanoparticles, while the pH value almost maintained a constant when 1.2 g chitosan nanoparticles was used. Based on the above experimental results, 1.0 g chitosan nanoparticles dispersed in 100 mL isopropanol was selected, and the characterization procedure for the specimens was organized as follows.
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) analysis of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles was conducted using Thermo Nicolet IS10 Spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) in the range between 4000 and 400 cm −1 with KBr pellet method. X-ray diffraction (XRD) profiles of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles were recorded using DX-2700 X-ray diffractometer (Dandong Haoyuan Instrument Co. Ltd., Dandong, China) with Cu Kα radiation. Chitosan after ball grinding was ultrasonically dispersed in the anhydrous ethanol in the concentration of 0.01% (v/v) for 20 min. The Beckman LS13320 laser particle size analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) was used to measure the particle size of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles. The morphology of nanoparticles and specimens was analyzed with a scanning electron microscope (FEI, Quanta 200, Hillsboro, OR, USA). A silicon wafer was used as the base surface and tested after gold spray treatment. Analyses were performed at low vacuum  at the accelerating voltage of 5 kV and magnification of 40×. SEM images and elemental maps were generated using a HITACHI SU3500 SEM (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) coupled

Materials
Chitosan (deacetylation 90% and MW 1 × 10 6 Da) was purchased from Zhejiang Golden-shell Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Yuhuan, China), while isopropanol was purchased from J&K Scientific Ltd. (Beijing, China) The Shuxuan paper (density 40 g/m 2 ) of Jingxian Purple Light Paper Industry, Anhui, China, was used as a model specimen. The pH of the deionized water in which the Shuxuan paper is dipped was measured according to GB/T1545-2008 [43] with METTLER-TOLEDO FE28 pH Meter (Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA), and the measured pH value was about 5.0.

Preparation Chitosan Nanoparticles
Chitosan powders were mechanically milled in a QM-3SP2 planetary ball mill (NanDa Instrument Plant, Nanjing, China) at 400 rpm for 120 h using zirconia balls. The chitosan powders were obtained by separating the zirconia balls.

Conservation Procedure and Characterization Methods
The treatments for different specimens are as follows. Different masses of chitosan nanoparticles milled (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 g) were dispersed in 100 mL isopropanol via ultrasonic treatment for 15 min. Then, 30 mL dispersive solution of chitosan with different concentrations was sprayed on a 35 × 35 cm 2 paper. The samples were placed into the BCM-1000 bio-cleaning worktable, and isopropanol was completely volatilized under low wind speed. Before testing, the samples were maintained at (23 ± 1) • C with the relative humidity of (50 ± 2) % for 24 h according to Chinese standard GB/T 10739-2002 [44] (eqv ISO 187:1990) [45] The pH value of the specimens is increased with the amount of chitosan nanoparticles increasing. The pH value is increased from 5.0 to 7.11 when using 1.0 g chitosan nanoparticles, while the pH value almost maintained a constant when 1.2 g chitosan nanoparticles was used. Based on the above experimental results, 1.0 g chitosan nanoparticles dispersed in 100 mL isopropanol was selected, and the characterization procedure for the specimens was organized as follows.
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) analysis of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles was conducted using Thermo Nicolet IS10 Spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) in the range between 4000 and 400 cm −1 with KBr pellet method. X-ray diffraction (XRD) profiles of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles were recorded using DX-2700 X-ray diffractometer (Dandong Haoyuan Instrument Co. Ltd., Dandong, China) with Cu Kα radiation. Chitosan after ball grinding was ultrasonically dispersed in the anhydrous ethanol in the concentration of 0.01% (v/v) for 20 min. The Beckman LS13320 laser particle size analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) was used to measure the particle size of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles. The morphology of nanoparticles and specimens was analyzed with a scanning electron microscope (FEI, Quanta 200, Hillsboro, OR, USA). A silicon wafer was used as the base surface and tested after gold spray treatment. Analyses were performed at low vacuum (1-150 Pa) at the accelerating voltage of 5 kV and magnification of 40×. SEM images and elemental maps were generated using a HITACHI SU3500 SEM (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) coupled with an AMETEK EDAX Octane Elite EDX System at the magnification of 150×. An atomic force microscope (AFM) (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) was employed to observe the longitudinal direction of chitosan after ball grinding, i.e., in the direction of the height of particle. The closed-loop noise level in the XY direction was <0.15 nm. Open loop noise level in XY direction was <0.10 nm, while the Z direction closed loop noise level was <0.035 nm. The XY scanning range was 12.5 × 12.5 µm 2 , and the vertical scanning range was 10 nm. The polished silicon wafer was used to prepare the concentrated sulfuric acid in 7:3 ratio and mixture of 30% hydrogen peroxide solution at 90 • C for 1 h. Then, the sample was dropped on the silicon wafer and dried naturally for further tests. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) (Shimadu, Tokyo, Japan) was used to analyze the key elements on the Shuxuan paper surface before and after treatment with chitosan nanoparticles. Al Kα (1486 eV) was used as the X-ray source, wherein, the X-ray gun was 12.5 kV × 20 mA, 250 W, general energy was 100 eV, step length was 0.1 eV/s, vacuum chamber pressure was less than 1 × 10 −6 Pa, and resolution was 0.8 eV (Ag-like Al target). The scanning was performed three times and normalized.
The tensile strength of 270 × 15 mm size specimens was measured with QT-1136PC universal material testing machine (Gaotai Testing Instrument Co., Ltd, Dongguan, China) as per ISO 1924-2:1994 method [46]. The folding endurance of the 150 × 15 mm 2 size specimens was measured with the YT-CTM tester according to ISO 5626:1993 method [47]. The samples were cut according to the machine (MD) and cross directions (CD) of the paper.
Dry heat and hygrothermal accelerated aging methods were evaluated to evaluate the resistance of chitosan nanoparticle coating. The dry heat accelerated aging test was performed in a DHG-9245A aging chamber at 105 • C for 72 h according to ISO 5630-1:1991 [48]. The hygrothermal accelerated aging test was performed in a DHG-9245A aging chamber at 80 • C and 65% relative humidity (RH) for 72 h as per GB/T 22894-2008 [49]. The pH of the deionized water in which the paper is dipped was measured according to GB/T1545-2008 with METTLER-TOLEDO FE28 pH Meter.
Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Chaetomium globosum, Aspergillus fumigatus are the model species of fungi found in the archives or museum. To evaluate the antifungal activity of the coated paper, experiments were performed to test the durability of antifungal effect on the specimens. All the materials and vessels were sterilized in advance by autoclaving, and the tests were performed in an electroheating standing-temperature incubator in favorable conditions for fungal development (high humidity and temperature). The PDA medium (GB/T4789.   [50] and czapek's medium (GB/T4789.   [51] were used for colony breeding. Shuxuan paper samples (ø = 55 mm) per treatment were treated with the chitosan nanoparticles and placed over medium in a petridish, respectively, inoculated with the four fungal species, wherein 0.1 mL inoculum concentration was 1 × 10 8 spores mL −1 , and incubation was performed at 22 • C. The non-inoculated samples were used as the contamination controls. The fungal growth was assessed after two weeks of incubation. This step is commonly employed by the paper conservators when dealing with paper objects affected by fungi [52,53]. Fungal growth was quantified by the measurement of colonized areas and the determination of biomass dry weight [54]. The % of growth inhibition was calculated using Equation (1), where A NT is the average colonized area on the untreated control samples and A T is the average colonized area on the treated samples [55]:

Characterization of Chitosan Nanoparticles
The chitosan nanoparticles were characterized via SEM, XRD, LPSA, and FTIR. Figure 2a,b show the SEM images of the original chitosan particles and chitosan particles after ball milling for 120 h. There is significant difference between the particle sizes. In addition, the particle size distribution of Coatings 2020, 10, 1226 5 of 15 chitosan without ball grinding is non-uniform and its morphology is irregular, and the average particle size is larger than 5 microns. After ball grinding for 120 h, the shape became spherical, with a diameter of less than 100 nm. Figure 3 displays the size distribution of chitosan after ball milling. The size of original chitosan particles is about 200 µm, and the size of milled chitosan particles is about 75 nm, implying that the milling process reduced the chitosan particles size. The results of chitosan particle height after ball grinding are presented in Figure 4. The z-axis height is 10 nm, the nanoparticles had similar thickness, and the dispersion and molecular size distribution are relatively uniform. Combined with Figures 2-4, the results show that the chitosan powder prepared by physical ball grinding was spherical in shape, with a diameter of less than 100 nm.
Coatings 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 15 particle size is larger than 5 microns. After ball grinding for 120 h, the shape became spherical, with a diameter of less than 100 nm. Figure 3 displays the size distribution of chitosan after ball milling. The size of original chitosan particles is about 200 μm, and the size of milled chitosan particles is about 75 nm, implying that the milling process reduced the chitosan particles size. The results of chitosan particle height after ball grinding are presented in Figure 4. The z-axis height is 10 nm, the nanoparticles had similar thickness, and the dispersion and molecular size distribution are relatively uniform. Combined with Figures 2-4, the results show that the chitosan powder prepared by physical ball grinding was spherical in shape, with a diameter of less than 100 nm.    Coatings 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 15 particle size is larger than 5 microns. After ball grinding for 120 h, the shape became spherical, with a diameter of less than 100 nm. Figure 3 displays the size distribution of chitosan after ball milling. The size of original chitosan particles is about 200 μm, and the size of milled chitosan particles is about 75 nm, implying that the milling process reduced the chitosan particles size. The results of chitosan particle height after ball grinding are presented in Figure 4. The z-axis height is 10 nm, the nanoparticles had similar thickness, and the dispersion and molecular size distribution are relatively uniform. Combined with Figures 2-4, the results show that the chitosan powder prepared by physical ball grinding was spherical in shape, with a diameter of less than 100 nm.    Coatings 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 15 particle size is larger than 5 microns. After ball grinding for 120 h, the shape became spherical, with a diameter of less than 100 nm. Figure 3 displays the size distribution of chitosan after ball milling. The size of original chitosan particles is about 200 μm, and the size of milled chitosan particles is about 75 nm, implying that the milling process reduced the chitosan particles size. The results of chitosan particle height after ball grinding are presented in Figure 4. The z-axis height is 10 nm, the nanoparticles had similar thickness, and the dispersion and molecular size distribution are relatively uniform. Combined with Figures 2-4, the results show that the chitosan powder prepared by physical ball grinding was spherical in shape, with a diameter of less than 100 nm.      Figure 5 presents the FTIR spectra of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles. Absorption bands due to stretching vibration of OH associated with pyranose ring overlapped with that of NH 2 associated with primary amines and both occurred at 3425/3448 cm −1 [56,57]. As shown in Figure 5, the absorption peak of symmetric stretching vibration of CH in pyranose ring is found at 2874 cm −1 . The carbonyl stretching vibration (amide-I), N-H stretching vibration (amide-II), and C-N stretching vibration (amide-III) of chitosan are indicated by their absorption at 1635, 1579, and 1424 cm −1 , respectively [58][59][60]. Notably, 1164 cm −1 is the symmetric stretching vibration of C-O-C and 1073 cm −1 is the characteristic absorption peak of ether bond stretching vibration in the pyrenoid ring [49]. Comparing the infrared absorption spectra of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles, the type and location of the characteristic absorption peak basically did not change, while the absorption peak of chitosan nanoparticles demonstrated a moving trend, indicating that the intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen bonds of chitosan decreased. These results suggest that chemical changes of chitosan are not undergone, with respect to structure, upon reduction to nanoparticles.
Coatings 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 15 Figure 5 presents the FTIR spectra of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles. Absorption bands due to stretching vibration of OH associated with pyranose ring overlapped with that of NH2 associated with primary amines and both occurred at 3425/3448 cm −1 [56,57]. As shown in Figure 5, the absorption peak of symmetric stretching vibration of CH in pyranose ring is found at 2874 cm −1 . The carbonyl stretching vibration (amide-I), N-H stretching vibration (amide-II), and C-N stretching vibration (amide-III) of chitosan are indicated by their absorption at 1635, 1579, and 1424 cm −1 , respectively [58][59][60]. Notably, 1164 cm −1 is the symmetric stretching vibration of C-O-C and 1073 cm −1 is the characteristic absorption peak of ether bond stretching vibration in the pyrenoid ring [49]. Comparing the infrared absorption spectra of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles, the type and location of the characteristic absorption peak basically did not change, while the absorption peak of chitosan nanoparticles demonstrated a moving trend, indicating that the intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen bonds of chitosan decreased. These results suggest that chemical changes of chitosan are not undergone, with respect to structure, upon reduction to nanoparticles. XRD patterns of the chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles are obtained, and the corresponding results are presented in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 6, chitosan displayed a strong diffraction peak at around 20.1°, which is associated with the mixture of (001) and (100) planes that belong to the monoclinic system and one weak diffraction peak at 10.6° [61]. XRD of chitosan nanoparticles displayed only one peak at 20.1°. To compare with the XRD spectrum of chitosan powder, the 10° diffraction peak disappeared completely, the 20° diffraction peak relative intensity decreased significantly, and the amorphous area relatively increased. This is because the process of milling disrupts the crystalline regions of chitosan and produces highly amorphous nanoparticles. XRD patterns of the chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles are obtained, and the corresponding results are presented in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 6, chitosan displayed a strong diffraction peak at around 20.1 • , which is associated with the mixture of (001) and (100) planes that belong to the monoclinic system and one weak diffraction peak at 10.6 • [61]. XRD of chitosan nanoparticles displayed only one peak at 20.1 • . To compare with the XRD spectrum of chitosan powder, the 10 • diffraction peak disappeared completely, the 20 • diffraction peak relative intensity decreased significantly, and the amorphous area relatively increased. This is because the process of milling disrupts the crystalline regions of chitosan and produces highly amorphous nanoparticles.

Conservation Applications of Chitosan Nanocomposites
The decrease in mechanical properties and acidity of the paper are prime indicators of paper deterioration [62]. Generally, the tensile strength and folding endurance are used to characterize the degradation related to the extent of oxidation and hydrolysis of cellulosic fibers of paper [63]. The comparison of tensile strength and folding endurance between the uncoated paper and the one coated with chitosan nanoparticles of paper and after accelerated aging tests is shown in Figure 7. Both the tensile strength and folding endurance are increased for the coated paper with chitosan nanoparticles as compared to the uncoated paper. It can be seen that the tensile strength and folding endurance at cross directions (CDs) of treated samples increased by 55.7% and 50.0%, respectively. The folding endurance of untreated samples at cross directions (CDs) decreased by 50.0% and 83.3% after hydrothermal and dry heat ageing, while treated samples decreased by 11.1% and 22.2%, respectively. The tensile strength of untreated samples at cross directions (CDs) decreased by 35.8% and 55.3% after hydrothermal and dry heat ageing, while treated samples decreased by 4.6% and 6.3%, respectively. There is a significant difference between the MD and CD of the paper about tensile strength and folding endurance of the paper, and, in general, MD is greater than CD. Therefore, the Chitosan nanoparticles may play an important role in improving the mechanical properties of the paper. The coated papers have better thermal and wet stability and clearly exhibit a lower loss of paper strength than the uncoated papers. This is because the chitosan nanoparticles go deep inside the fiber, and the formed protective layer can repair the fiber defects and cracks by bridging the loose fibers and fillers. In addition, as per Figure 8, the pH of the coated papers is generally increased by chitosan nanoparticles. The pH of paper coated with chitosan nanoparticles increased from 5.0 to 7.11, due to the presence of acid in the paper. Compared with the uncoated paper, the paper treated with chitosan nanoparticles displayed a superior durability.

Conservation Applications of Chitosan Nanocomposites
The decrease in mechanical properties and acidity of the paper are prime indicators of paper deterioration [62]. Generally, the tensile strength and folding endurance are used to characterize the degradation related to the extent of oxidation and hydrolysis of cellulosic fibers of paper [63]. The comparison of tensile strength and folding endurance between the uncoated paper and the one coated with chitosan nanoparticles of paper and after accelerated aging tests is shown in Figure 7. Both the tensile strength and folding endurance are increased for the coated paper with chitosan nanoparticles as compared to the uncoated paper. It can be seen that the tensile strength and folding endurance at cross directions (CDs) of treated samples increased by 55.7% and 50.0%, respectively. The folding endurance of untreated samples at cross directions (CDs) decreased by 50.0% and 83.3% after hydrothermal and dry heat ageing, while treated samples decreased by 11.1% and 22.2%, respectively. The tensile strength of untreated samples at cross directions (CDs) decreased by 35.8% and 55.3% after hydrothermal and dry heat ageing, while treated samples decreased by 4.6% and 6.3%, respectively. There is a significant difference between the MD and CD of the paper about tensile strength and folding endurance of the paper, and, in general, MD is greater than CD. Therefore, the Chitosan nanoparticles may play an important role in improving the mechanical properties of the paper. The coated papers have better thermal and wet stability and clearly exhibit a lower loss of paper strength than the uncoated papers. This is because the chitosan nanoparticles go deep inside the fiber, and the formed protective layer can repair the fiber defects and cracks by bridging the loose fibers and fillers. In addition, as per Figure 8, the pH of the coated papers is generally increased by chitosan nanoparticles. The pH of paper coated with chitosan nanoparticles increased from 5.0 to 7.11, due to the presence of acid in the paper. Compared with the uncoated paper, the paper treated with chitosan nanoparticles displayed a superior durability.   Figure 9 presents an SEM image of the morphology of paper specimens before and after treatment with chitosan nanoparticles. As shown in Figure 9a, the cellulose fibers of the untreated paper specimens are entwined with wide pores. The chitosan nanoparticles are attached to the surface of the paper fiber and the pores in the internal fiber mesh are filled with these nanoparticles forming a protective layer (Figure 9b). The components of the nanoparticles are characterized by EDX mapping as shown in Figure 9c. Apart from C and O elements, N element is found in the surrounding area (Figure 9b Area 1). After hygrothermal aging, the chitosan nanoparticles demonstrated a membrane phenomenon (Figure 9d) and covered the fiber surface. After dry heat aging, the chitosan nanoparticles remained granular and dispersed on the surface of the paper and in cracks between the    Figure 9 presents an SEM image of the morphology of paper specimens before and after treatment with chitosan nanoparticles. As shown in Figure 9a, the cellulose fibers of the untreated paper specimens are entwined with wide pores. The chitosan nanoparticles are attached to the surface of the paper fiber and the pores in the internal fiber mesh are filled with these nanoparticles forming a protective layer (Figure 9b). The components of the nanoparticles are characterized by EDX mapping as shown in Figure 9c. Apart from C and O elements, N element is found in the surrounding area (Figure 9b Area 1). After hygrothermal aging, the chitosan nanoparticles demonstrated a membrane phenomenon (Figure 9d) and covered the fiber surface. After dry heat aging, the chitosan nanoparticles remained granular and dispersed on the surface of the paper and in cracks between the Figure 8. pH of uncoated and coated paper before and after accelerated aging tests. Figure 9 presents an SEM image of the morphology of paper specimens before and after treatment with chitosan nanoparticles. As shown in Figure 9a, the cellulose fibers of the untreated paper specimens are entwined with wide pores. The chitosan nanoparticles are attached to the surface of the paper fiber and the pores in the internal fiber mesh are filled with these nanoparticles forming a protective layer (Figure 9b). The components of the nanoparticles are characterized by EDX mapping as shown in Figure 9c. Apart from C and O elements, N element is found in the surrounding area (Figure 9b Area 1). After hygrothermal aging, the chitosan nanoparticles demonstrated a membrane phenomenon (Figure 9d) and covered the fiber surface. After dry heat aging, the chitosan nanoparticles remained granular and dispersed on the surface of the paper and in cracks between the paper fibers ( Figure 9e). Combined with Figure 7, the formed protective layer attached to the surface of the paper Coatings 2020, 10, 1226 9 of 15 increased the mechanical strength of the paper in the process of reinforcing the paper. And the wrapped and compact fiber can prevent possible degradation due to temperature and humidity.
Coatings 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 15 paper fibers (Figure 9e). Combined with Figure 7, the formed protective layer attached to the surface of the paper increased the mechanical strength of the paper in the process of reinforcing the paper. And the wrapped and compact fiber can prevent possible degradation due to temperature and humidity. Figure 9. SEM surface images of paper: (a) before treatment with chitosan nanoparticles; (b) after treatment with chitosan nanoparticles; (c) EDX spectrum collected at Area 1; (d) treated paper after hygrothermal aging; (e) treated paper after dry heat aging.
XPS spectra of high-resolution scans of the key elements on Shuxuan paper surface before and after treatment with chitosan nanoparticles are obtained to gain further insights into the adsorption mechanism ( Figure 10). Compared with the treated paper, the paper before treatment has C 1s and O 1s peaks. As the raw material is not processed, the paper cellulose is composed of C, H, and O elements. After the treatment with chitosan nanoparticles, N 1s peak of the chitosan nanoparticle-coated paper appeared, which indicates that the elemental composition of the paper surface is changed after the treatment. This means that N elements are introduced into the acidified paper through chitosan nanoparticles. Combined with Figure 9d, the protonation of the amino group of chitosan nanoparticles led to good solubility in water and excellent film-forming property.  XPS spectra of high-resolution scans of the key elements on Shuxuan paper surface before and after treatment with chitosan nanoparticles are obtained to gain further insights into the adsorption mechanism ( Figure 10). Compared with the treated paper, the paper before treatment has C 1s and O 1s peaks. As the raw material is not processed, the paper cellulose is composed of C, H, and O elements. After the treatment with chitosan nanoparticles, N 1s peak of the chitosan nanoparticle-coated paper appeared, which indicates that the elemental composition of the paper surface is changed after the treatment. This means that N elements are introduced into the acidified paper through chitosan nanoparticles. Combined with Figure 9d, the protonation of the amino group of chitosan nanoparticles led to good solubility in water and excellent film-forming property.
Coatings 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 15 paper fibers (Figure 9e). Combined with Figure 7, the formed protective layer attached to the surface of the paper increased the mechanical strength of the paper in the process of reinforcing the paper. And the wrapped and compact fiber can prevent possible degradation due to temperature and humidity. Figure 9. SEM surface images of paper: (a) before treatment with chitosan nanoparticles; (b) after treatment with chitosan nanoparticles; (c) EDX spectrum collected at Area 1; (d) treated paper after hygrothermal aging; (e) treated paper after dry heat aging.
XPS spectra of high-resolution scans of the key elements on Shuxuan paper surface before and after treatment with chitosan nanoparticles are obtained to gain further insights into the adsorption mechanism ( Figure 10). Compared with the treated paper, the paper before treatment has C 1s and O 1s peaks. As the raw material is not processed, the paper cellulose is composed of C, H, and O elements. After the treatment with chitosan nanoparticles, N 1s peak of the chitosan nanoparticle-coated paper appeared, which indicates that the elemental composition of the paper surface is changed after the treatment. This means that N elements are introduced into the acidified paper through chitosan nanoparticles. Combined with Figure 9d, the protonation of the amino group of chitosan nanoparticles led to good solubility in water and excellent film-forming property.  The curves of N 1s were fitted using the XPS Peak Fit software (V4.1), and the analytical spectra of N 1s are presented in Figure 11a,b. The N 1s of the original chitosan only had one peak after fitting (Figure 11a). The binding energy at 399.7 eV corresponds to -NH 2 , which reflects the original molecular structure of chitosan. There are two peaks in Figure 11b. The peak at 399.7 eV is assigned to NH 2 chemical bonding, while the peak at 401.4 eV is assigned to amino groups in the ammonium form (NH 3 + ) [64]. Considering the pKa of chitosan amine groups (ca. 6.5), both forms, NH 2 and NH 3 + , are likely to be present in the chitosan membranes [65]. The upward shift of the electron binding energy to 401.4 V for the peak assigned to NH 3 + groups suggests the presence of protonated amines in the form of ammonium salts. This is because of the ionic bonding with free H + in the acidified paper. The remaining −NH 2 can be used as a base reserve. As shown in Figure 7, the increase in strength of the paper treated with chitosan nanoparticles is due to the formation of chitosan protective layer when the nanoparticles combined with H + . The possible interaction mechanism is shown in a schematic in Figure 12. The isopropanol suspension of chitosan nanoparticles is sprayed on acidic paper and used as Lewis base to combine with free acids in the paper forming ammonium salt. Under the action of water molecules, the film is formed, and there is molecular interaction between chitosan and cellulose. Finally, the tensile strength of the paper increased by 1.557 times, and the folding resistance increased by 1.5 times compared to the untreated samples.
Coatings 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 15 The curves of N 1s were fitted using the XPS Peak Fit software (V4.1), and the analytical spectra of N 1s are presented in Figure 11a,b. The N 1s of the original chitosan only had one peak after fitting (Figure 11a). The binding energy at 399.7 eV corresponds to -NH2, which reflects the original molecular structure of chitosan. There are two peaks in Figure 11b. The peak at 399.7 eV is assigned to NH2 chemical bonding, while the peak at 401.4 eV is assigned to amino groups in the ammonium form (NH3 + ) [64]. Considering the pKa of chitosan amine groups (ca. 6.5), both forms, NH2 and NH3 + , are likely to be present in the chitosan membranes [65]. The upward shift of the electron binding energy to 401.4 V for the peak assigned to NH3 + groups suggests the presence of protonated amines in the form of ammonium salts. This is because of the ionic bonding with free H + in the acidified paper. The remaining −NH2 can be used as a base reserve. As shown in Figure 7, the increase in strength of the paper treated with chitosan nanoparticles is due to the formation of chitosan protective layer when the nanoparticles combined with H + . The possible interaction mechanism is shown in a schematic in Figure 12. The isopropanol suspension of chitosan nanoparticles is sprayed on acidic paper and used as Lewis base to combine with free acids in the paper forming ammonium salt. Under the action of water molecules, the film is formed, and there is molecular interaction between chitosan and cellulose. Finally, the tensile strength of the paper increased by 1.557 times, and the folding resistance increased by 1.5 times compared to the untreated samples.   The curves of N 1s were fitted using the XPS Peak Fit software (V4.1), and the analytical spectra of N 1s are presented in Figure 11a,b. The N 1s of the original chitosan only had one peak after fitting (Figure 11a). The binding energy at 399.7 eV corresponds to -NH2, which reflects the original molecular structure of chitosan. There are two peaks in Figure 11b. The peak at 399.7 eV is assigned to NH2 chemical bonding, while the peak at 401.4 eV is assigned to amino groups in the ammonium form (NH3 + ) [64]. Considering the pKa of chitosan amine groups (ca. 6.5), both forms, NH2 and NH3 + , are likely to be present in the chitosan membranes [65]. The upward shift of the electron binding energy to 401.4 V for the peak assigned to NH3 + groups suggests the presence of protonated amines in the form of ammonium salts. This is because of the ionic bonding with free H + in the acidified paper. The remaining −NH2 can be used as a base reserve. As shown in Figure 7, the increase in strength of the paper treated with chitosan nanoparticles is due to the formation of chitosan protective layer when the nanoparticles combined with H + . The possible interaction mechanism is shown in a schematic in Figure 12. The isopropanol suspension of chitosan nanoparticles is sprayed on acidic paper and used as Lewis base to combine with free acids in the paper forming ammonium salt. Under the action of water molecules, the film is formed, and there is molecular interaction between chitosan and cellulose. Finally, the tensile strength of the paper increased by 1.557 times, and the folding resistance increased by 1.5 times compared to the untreated samples.    The durability of the antifungal effect was, respectively, evaluated for the different fungal inoculum for treated and untreated paper samples at two weeks. As presented in Figure 13, there was greater fungal growth on the untreated paper samples. Untreated paper vaccinated for aspergillus Niger in a petri dish displayed clear stellate distribution. Aspergillus flavus presented a yellow powder on the surface of the untreated circular paper. Aspergillus fumigatus mycelium was distributed similar to "smoke" on the surface of the untreated circular paper. Due to the fast growth of mycelia, the mold colonies easily spread and expanded, further masking the effective information. In addition, some fungal metabolites can reduce the paper strength and pose a threat to consumer health. The paper samples that were treated with chitosan nanoparticles displayed a significant preventive antifungal effect against the fungal inoculum. Under the same conditions, the mold did not grow on the paper and the culture plate had slightly more prominent. Aspergillus fumigatus and the fungal growth inhibition was about 92% (Table 1). However, the inhibition effect was significantly better compared with the untreated samples. This is because when the chitosan nanoparticles are protonized under acidic conditions, electrostatic interactions between the positive charges from chitosan chains and negatively charged phospholipids affect the cell membranes. In addition, the protonized nanoparticles become more soluble in aqueous solutions, and for this reason a better interaction with all kinds of molecules are expected to be more facilitated [66]. This phenomenon prevents the spread of mold and inhibits the growth and reproduction of mold. The durability of the antifungal effect was, respectively, evaluated for the different fungal inoculum for treated and untreated paper samples at two weeks. As presented in Figure 13, there was greater fungal growth on the untreated paper samples. Untreated paper vaccinated for aspergillus Niger in a petri dish displayed clear stellate distribution. Aspergillus flavus presented a yellow powder on the surface of the untreated circular paper. Aspergillus fumigatus mycelium was distributed similar to "smoke" on the surface of the untreated circular paper. Due to the fast growth of mycelia, the mold colonies easily spread and expanded, further masking the effective information. In addition, some fungal metabolites can reduce the paper strength and pose a threat to consumer health. The paper samples that were treated with chitosan nanoparticles displayed a significant preventive antifungal effect against the fungal inoculum. Under the same conditions, the mold did not grow on the paper and the culture plate had slightly more prominent. Aspergillus fumigatus and the fungal growth inhibition was about 92% (Table 1). However, the inhibition effect was significantly better compared with the untreated samples. This is because when the chitosan nanoparticles are protonized under acidic conditions, electrostatic interactions between the positive charges from chitosan chains and negatively charged phospholipids affect the cell membranes. In addition, the protonized nanoparticles become more soluble in aqueous solutions, and for this reason a better interaction with all kinds of molecules are expected to be more facilitated [66]. This phenomenon prevents the spread of mold and inhibits the growth and reproduction of mold. Coated paper samples 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 92 ± 0 100 ± 0 Figure 13. Images of paper samples at two weeks of incubation after preventive treatment.

Conclusions
Chitosan nanoparticles are employed for the one-step reinforcement and deacidification of paper documents. Chitosan nanoparticles are prepared via the physical ball grinding method and characterized by SEM, XRD, LPSA, and FTIR. The results show that the chitosan powder prepared by physical ball grinding is spherical in shape, with a diameter of less than 100 nm, and the chemical Figure 13. Images of paper samples at two weeks of incubation after preventive treatment.

Conclusions
Chitosan nanoparticles are employed for the one-step reinforcement and deacidification of paper documents. Chitosan nanoparticles are prepared via the physical ball grinding method and characterized by SEM, XRD, LPSA, and FTIR. The results show that the chitosan powder prepared by physical ball grinding is spherical in shape, with a diameter of less than 100 nm, and the chemical changes of chitosan are not undergone, with respect to structure, upon reduction to nanoparticles. The SEM, EDX, and XPS are used to analyze the interaction mechanism between the chitosan nanoparticles and Shuxuan paper. The increase in the strength of the paper treated with chitosan nanoparticles is due to the formation of chitosan protective layer when the nanoparticles combined with H 2 O and H + . The pH of coated papers is generally increased from 5.0 to 7.11 and tensile strength and folding endurance are both increased for the paper coated with chitosan nanoparticles compared to the uncoated paper. To evaluate the resistance of chitosan nanoparticle coating, the degradation of mechanical properties of paper after artificial aging is evaluated by the tensile strength and folding endurance tests using dry heat and hygrothermal accelerated aging methods. The paper treated with chitosan nanoparticles displayed superior durability. The SEM, EDX, and XPS are used to analyze the interaction mechanism between the chitosan and Shuxuan paper. There is a presence of protonated amines in the form of ammonium salts due to ionic bonding with free H + in the acidified paper, and the remaining −NH 2 can be used as a base reserve. The antimicrobial activity of the chitosan-nanoparticle-coated paper is also assessed with four common fungi that are found in archives and museums, and the results show that the chitosan nanoparticles have strong antibacterial properties. The as-proposed technique can provide technical support to improve the mechanical properties of acidified fragile paper. In the future, it is possible to effectively save on manpower and material resources and prevent damage to paper in the repair process.